UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
Investment Company Act file number | 811-4257 |
DWS Variable Series I
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154-0004
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190
Paul Schubert
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154-0004
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
Date of reporting period: | 12/31/08 |
ITEM 1. REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS
December 31, 2008
ANNUAL REPORT
DWS VARIABLE SERIES I
DWS Bond VIP DWS Growth & Income VIP DWS Capital Growth VIP DWS Global Opportunities VIP DWS International VIP DWS Health Care VIP |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cce4b/cce4b8bfcc7e2876799007a4a737ccc0060589fb" alt="dvs1_coverlogo0"
Contents
Performance Summary, Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, Management Summary, Portfolio Summary, Investment Portfolio, Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for:
3 DWS Bond VIP 23 DWS Growth & Income VIP 38 DWS Capital Growth VIP 51 DWS Global Opportunities VIP 65 DWS International VIP 77 DWS Health Care VIP 88 Notes to Financial Statements 97 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 98 Tax Information 99 Proxy Voting 100 Investment Management Agreement Approval 114 Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant 117 Summary of Administrative Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant 118 Board Members and Officers |
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. To obtain an additional prospectus, call (800) 778-1482 or your financial representative. We advise you to consider the product's objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment product. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.
NOT FDIC/NCUA INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE NOT A DEPOSIT
NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
Investments in variable portfolios involve risk. Some portfolios have more risk than others. These include portfolios that allow exposure to or otherwise concentrate investments in certain sectors, geographic regions, security types, market capitalization or foreign securities (e.g., political or economic instability, which can be accentuated in Emerging Market countries). Please read the prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
DWS Investments is part of Deutsche Bank's Asset Management division and, within the US, represents the retail asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. and DWS Trust Company.
Performance Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Bond VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratio, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2008 is 0.57% for Class A shares. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2008.
Portfolio returns during 3-year, 5-year and 10-year periods shown reflect a fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
Investments by the Portfolio in lower-rated bonds present greater risk to principal and income than investments in higher-quality securities. This Portfolio invests in individual bonds whose yields and market values fluctuate so that your investment may be worth more or less than its original cost. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk such that when interest rates rise, the prices of the bonds, and thus the value of the investment, can decline and the investor can lose principal value. Additionally, investing in foreign securities presents certain risks, such as currency fluctuation and changes in political/economic conditions and market risks. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. In the current market environment, mortgage-backed securities are experiencing increased volatility. Please see this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Bond VIP — Class A [] Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index | The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index (name changed from Lehman Brothers US Aggregate Index, effective November 3, 2008) is an unmanaged, market value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues and mortgage securities. Index returns, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddf11/ddf11139434b3a8999ea12c56b3a82060835c382" alt="dvs1_g10k660" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Bond VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $8,323 | $9,080 | $9,817 | $12,858 |
Average annual total return
| -16.77% | -3.17% | -.37% | 2.55% |
Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,524 | $11,745 | $12,552 | $17,297 |
Average annual total return
| 5.24% | 5.51% | 4.65% | 5.63% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Bond VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
• Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
• Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2008 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 846.20 |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.78 |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 1,022.12 |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 3.05 |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 366.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Bond VIP
| .60% |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Bond VIP
Entering the year, banks were pulling back financing from the markets as they were forced to come to terms with losses related to the subprime mortgage crisis that had emerged in the summer of 2007. As 2008 progressed, ongoing fallout from the collapse in housing and mortgages led to the failure, forced merger or government bailout of a number of leading global financial institutions in both the US and Europe. The result was a further tightening of credit that caused global economic growth to pull back sharply during the fourth quarter. Given this backdrop, investors' risk tolerance approached zero and liquidity all but evaporated. What ensued was a frantic "flight to quality" into the safe haven of US Treasuries and underperformance for all other segments of the bond market. Emerging-market and high-yield corporate bonds underperformed the broader bond market by a wide margin for the year. As investor risk aversion peaked in October and November, even AAA-rated mortgage-backed issues experienced a collapse in demand.1
During the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008, the Portfolio provided a total return of -16.77% (Class A shares, unadjusted for contract charges) compared with the 5.24% return of its benchmark, the Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index.
The Portfolio's focus on fixed-income sectors that trade at a yield spread to Treasuries detracted from performance for the period, driven by the unprecedented flight to quality that boosted Treasuries.2 The Portfolio's high-yield corporate and emerging-market holdings fell significantly, although its relatively defensive positioning helped to limit the downside impact to some degree. Within the domestic portion of the Portfolio, commercial mortgage-backed securities and non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities suffered historically poor performance, especially late in the year. Late in the period, the Portfolio's exposure to high-yield corporate bonds was trimmed as we upgraded the Portfolio's quality profile.
Effective December 1, 2008, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (the "Advisor") assumed all advisory responsibilities for the portfolio that were previously delegated to the Portfolio's subadvisor and sub-subadvisor. The following portfolio managers handle the day-to-day management of the fund's investment portfolio. |
Kenneth R. Bowling, CFA Jamie Guenther, CFA | John Brennan Bruce Harley, CFA, CEBS | J. Richard Robben, CFA David Vignolo, CFA | J. Kevin Horsley, CFA, CPA Stephen Willer, CFA |
The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index (name changed from Lehman Brothers US Aggregate Index, effective November 3, 2008) is an unmanaged, market-value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues and mortgage securities.
Index returns, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
1 Credit quality (credit rating) is a measure of a bond issuer's ability to repay interest and principal in a timely manner. Rating agencies assign letter designations such as AAA, AA and so forth. The lower the rating, the higher the probability of default.2 The yield spread is the difference between the yield of a security and the yield of a comparable-duration Treasury. A large spread indicates that investors require yields substantially above those of Treasuries in order to invest in lower-quality bonds. This is generally indicative of a higher-risk environment. A smaller spread generally indicates a more positive environment, since investors are less concerned about risk and therefore willing to accept lower yields. A drop in the yield spread is a positive.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2008, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Bond VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Corporate Bonds | 24% | 19% |
Commercial and Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | 22% | 35% |
Mortgage-Backed Securities Pass-Throughs | 20% | 15% |
Government & Agency Obligations | 12% | 17% |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | 8% | 4% |
Cash Equivalents | 6% | 2% |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | 5% | 2% |
Preferred Securities | 2% | 5% |
Asset Backed | 1% | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Quality (Excludes Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
US Government & Treasury Obligations | 29% | 36% |
AAA* | 26% | 35% |
AA | 8% | 3% |
A | 8% | 7% |
BBB | 15% | 13% |
BB or Below | 3% | 6% |
Not Rated | 11% | — |
| 100% | 100% |
Effective Maturity (Excludes Cash Equivalents and Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Under 1 year | 10% | 3% |
1-4.99 years | 47% | 45% |
5-9.99 years | 27% | 41% |
10-14.99 years | 7% | 1% |
15+ years | 9% | 10% |
| 100% | 100% |
* Category includes cash equivalentsWeighted average effective maturity: 7.43 and 6.99 years, respectively.
Asset allocation, quality and effective maturity are subject to change.
The quality ratings represent the lower of Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") or Standard & Poor's Corporation ("S&P") credit ratings. The ratings of Moody's and S&P represent their opinions as to the quality of the securities they rate. Ratings are relative and subjective and are not absolute standards of quality. The Portfolio's credit quality does not remove market risk.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 9. A complete list of portfolio holdings of the Portfolio is posted as of the month end on www.dws-investments.com on or about the 15th day of the following month. More frequent posting of portfolio holdings information may be made from time to time on www.dws-investments.com.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2008
DWS Bond VIP
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Corporate Bonds 24.1% |
Consumer Discretionary 3.0% |
British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC, 144A, 9.5%, 11/15/2018 | 590,000 | 602,333 |
Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc., 9.455%, 11/15/2022 (b) | 235,000 | 263,284 |
Comcast Cable Holdings LLC, 10.125%, 4/15/2022 | 168,000 | 202,724 |
Comcast Corp., 6.4%, 5/15/2038 | 55,000 | 54,871 |
D.R. Horton, Inc., 5.375%, 6/15/2012 | 76,000 | 56,050 |
Grupo Televisa SA, 6.0%, 5/15/2018 | 500,000 | 420,450 |
Omnicom Group, Inc., Zero Coupon, 7/31/2032 | 405,000 | 386,269 |
TCI Communications, Inc., 8.75%, 8/1/2015 | 511,000 | 543,938 |
Time Warner Cable, Inc.: | | |
6.75%, 7/1/2018 | 445,000 | 428,448 |
7.3%, 7/1/2038 | 40,000 | 41,555 |
Time Warner, Inc.: | | |
7.625%, 4/15/2031 | 350,000 | 343,984 |
7.7%, 5/1/2032 | 305,000 | 305,376 |
Viacom, Inc.: | | |
5.75%, 4/30/2011 | 458,000 | 415,950 |
6.25%, 4/30/2016 | 775,000 | 642,392 |
| 4,707,624 |
Consumer Staples 1.4% |
CVS Caremark Corp.: | | |
6.25%, 6/1/2027 | 332,000 | 308,694 |
6.302%, 6/1/2037 | 1,050,000 | 535,500 |
Delhaize America, Inc., 9.0%, 4/15/2031 | 400,000 | 404,528 |
Kroger Co., 6.8%, 4/1/2011 | 505,000 | 521,418 |
Miller Brewing Co., 144A, 5.5%, 8/15/2013 | 425,000 | 396,264 |
| 2,166,404 |
Energy 2.6% |
Baker Hughes, Inc., 7.5%, 11/15/2018 | 420,000 | 465,636 |
Enbridge Energy Partners LP, 8.05%, 10/1/2037 | 61,000 | 29,697 |
Enterprise Products Operating LP: | | |
Series B, 5.6%, 10/15/2014 | 680,000 | 576,937 |
8.375%, 8/1/2066 | 82,000 | 45,100 |
EOG Co. of Canada, 144A, 7.0%, 12/1/2011 | 850,000 | 873,475 |
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 6.95%, 1/15/2038 | 510,000 | 412,461 |
Petro-Canada, 6.8%, 5/15/2038 | 545,000 | 411,276 |
Southern Union Co., 7.2%, 11/1/2066 | 190,000 | 65,550 |
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd.: | | |
5.85%, 3/15/2036 | 185,000 | 157,351 |
6.5%, 8/15/2018 | 420,000 | 412,046 |
Transocean Ltd., Series C, 1.5%, 12/15/2037 | 415,000 | 319,550 |
Transocean, Inc., 6.8%, 3/15/2038 | 280,000 | 249,745 |
| 4,018,824 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Financials 9.3% |
AES El Salvador Trust, 144A, 6.75%, 2/1/2016 | 475,000 | 338,581 |
American Express Credit Corp., Series C, 7.3%, 8/20/2013 (b) | 155,000 | 158,657 |
American International Group, Inc., 144A, 8.175%, 5/15/2058 | 170,000 | 66,134 |
ANZ National International Ltd., 144A, 6.2%, 7/19/2013 | 400,000 | 387,024 |
Banco Mercantil del Norte SA, 144A, 6.862%, 10/13/2021 | 362,000 | 217,200 |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp., Series G, 4.95%, 11/1/2012 (b) | 654,000 | 663,985 |
Berkshire Hathaway Finance Corp., 4.6%, 5/15/2013 | 515,000 | 514,990 |
BP Capital Markets PLC, 5.25%, 11/7/2013 | 735,000 | 767,293 |
Discover Financial Services, 2.629%*, 6/11/2010 | 515,000 | 440,972 |
Erac USA Finance Co.: | | |
144A, 5.8%, 10/15/2012 | 340,000 | 284,420 |
144A, 8.0%, 1/15/2011 | 330,000 | 309,569 |
ESI Tractebel Acquisition Corp., Series B, 7.99%, 12/30/2011 | 99,000 | 91,610 |
Farmers Exchange Capital, 144A, 7.2%, 7/15/2048 | 385,000 | 213,391 |
FPL Group Capital, Inc.: | | |
6.65%, 6/15/2067 | 360,000 | 187,200 |
Series D, 7.3%, 9/1/2067 | 20,000 | 11,200 |
Glen Meadow Pass-Through Trust, 144A, 6.505%, 2/12/2067 | 330,000 | 147,541 |
HBOS PLC, 144A, 6.75%, 5/21/2018 | 175,000 | 154,017 |
John Deere Capital Corp., Series D, 2.875%, 6/19/2012 (b) | 3,000,000 | 3,085,473 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 5.125%, 9/15/2014 | 435,000 | 421,549 |
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.: | | |
6.875%, 4/25/2018 | 245,000 | 256,276 |
7.75%, 5/14/2038 | 455,000 | 501,265 |
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I, 144A, 5.125%, 4/10/2013 | 565,000 | 526,444 |
Morgan Stanley, Series F, 6.0%, 4/28/2015 | 955,000 | 823,907 |
National Australia Bank Ltd., 144A, 5.35%, 6/12/2013 | 435,000 | 419,257 |
National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance Corp., 10.375%, 11/1/2018 | 630,000 | 737,357 |
NLV Financial Corp., 144A, 6.5%, 3/15/2035 | 734,000 | 465,665 |
NYSE Euronext, 4.8%, 6/28/2013 | 455,000 | 441,329 |
Red Arrow International Leasing, "A", 8.375%, 6/30/2012 RUB | 2,685,435 | 32,540 |
SPI Electricity & Gas Australia Holdings Property Ltd., 144A, 6.15%, 11/15/2013 | 425,000 | 425,895 |
Standard Chartered Bank, 144A, 6.4%, 9/26/2017 | 345,000 | 286,940 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
UDR, Inc., Series E, (REIT), 3.9%, 3/15/2010 | 245,000 | 212,453 |
US Bancorp., 0.704%*, 12/11/2035 | 255,000 | 232,688 |
Wells Fargo & Co., 5.25%, 10/23/2012 | 210,000 | 213,892 |
Xstrata Finance Canada Ltd., 144A, 6.9%, 11/15/2037 | 585,000 | 350,024 |
| 14,386,738 |
Health Care 0.9% |
Advanced Medical Optics, Inc., 7.5%, 5/1/2017 | 21,000 | 10,710 |
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.: | | |
6.125%, 3/15/2013 | 725,000 | 676,065 |
7.125%, 3/15/2018 | 715,000 | 660,727 |
| 1,347,502 |
Industrials 0.6% |
Allied Waste North America, Inc., 7.875%, 4/15/2013 | 193,000 | 183,350 |
America West Airlines, Inc., Series 99-1, 7.93%, 1/2/2019 | 196,587 | 157,761 |
Northwest Pipelines Corp., 5.95%, 4/15/2017 (b) | 450,000 | 394,875 |
Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc., 7.5%, 2/15/2024 | 58,000 | 38,570 |
Toll Corp., 8.25%, 12/1/2011 (b) | 83,000 | 75,530 |
| 850,086 |
Information Technology 0.9% |
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 6.125%, 6/1/2017 | 114,000 | 82,771 |
International Business Machines Corp., 6.5%, 10/15/2013 | 200,000 | 219,247 |
Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.0%, 10/1/2012 | 695,000 | 626,962 |
Xerox Corp.: | | |
6.35%, 5/15/2018 | 415,000 | 324,569 |
7.2%, 4/1/2016 (b) | 175,000 | 130,660 |
| 1,384,209 |
Materials 0.1% |
Pliant Corp., 11.85%, 6/15/2009 (PIK) | 7 | 4 |
Sappi Papier Holding AG, 144A, 6.75%, 6/15/2012 | 85,000 | 63,456 |
The Mosaic Co., 144A, 7.375%, 12/1/2014 | 157,000 | 128,740 |
| 192,200 |
Telecommunication Services 1.8% |
AT&T, Inc., 6.7%, 11/15/2013 (b) | 790,000 | 836,864 |
Cellco Partnership: | | |
144A, 7.375%, 11/15/2013 | 295,000 | 311,249 |
144A, 8.5%, 11/15/2018 | 370,000 | 433,520 |
Telecom Italia Capital: | | |
6.2%, 7/18/2011 | 175,000 | 155,313 |
7.721%, 6/4/2038 (b) | 310,000 | 254,587 |
Verizon Communications, Inc.: | | |
5.25%, 4/15/2013 (b) | 105,000 | 105,402 |
8.75%, 11/1/2018 | 595,000 | 698,067 |
| 2,795,002 |
Utilities 3.5% |
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., 6.35%, 10/1/2036 | 260,000 | 213,975 |
CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., 7.75%, 2/15/2011 (b) | 500,000 | 478,575 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
CMS Energy Corp., 8.5%, 4/15/2011 | 17,000 | 16,742 |
Commonwealth Edison Co.: | | |
Series 98, 6.15%, 3/15/2012 | 550,000 | 536,046 |
6.95%, 7/15/2018 | 310,000 | 293,500 |
Dominion Resources, Inc.: | | |
Series 06-B, 6.3%, 9/30/2066 | 330,000 | 148,500 |
7.5%, 6/30/2066 | 935,000 | 467,500 |
Energy Future Competitive Holdings Corp., 7.48%, 1/1/2017 | 339,527 | 199,611 |
Integrys Energy Group, Inc., 6.11%, 12/1/2066 | 580,000 | 278,400 |
Intergen NV, 144A, 9.0%, 6/30/2017 | 75,000 | 61,500 |
Majapahit Holding BV, REG S, 7.75%, 10/17/2016 | 100,000 | 55,030 |
New York State Electric & Gas Corp., 144A, 6.15%, 12/15/2017 | 1,055,000 | 960,151 |
Orion Power Holdings, Inc., 12.0%, 5/1/2010 | 120,000 | 120,000 |
PNM Resources, Inc., 9.25%, 5/15/2015 | 99,000 | 78,705 |
PPL Capital Funding, Inc., Series A, 6.7%, 3/30/2067 | 830,000 | 365,200 |
Regency Energy Partners LP, 8.375%, 12/15/2013 | 176,000 | 120,560 |
Union Electric Co., 6.7%, 2/1/2019 | 645,000 | 587,712 |
Wisconsin Energy Corp., Series A, 6.25%, 5/15/2067 | 955,000 | 472,725 |
| 5,454,432 |
Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $42,540,818) | 37,303,021 |
|
Asset-Backed 0.9% |
Automobile Receivables 0.3% |
Household Automotive Trust, "A4", Series 2006-1, 5.52%, 3/18/2013 | 500,000 | 436,736 |
Credit Card Receivables 0.5% |
Household Credit Card Master Note Trust I, "A", Series 2007-1, 1.245%*, 4/15/2013 | 1,214,000 | 763,094 |
Home Equity Loans 0.1% |
First Franklin Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, "A2A", Series 2007-FFC, 0.621%*, 6/25/2027 | 724,280 | 247,171 |
Total Asset-Backed (Cost $2,044,101) | 1,447,001 |
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities Pass-Throughs 19.9% |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | |
5.305%*, 6/1/2035 | 819,092 | 829,021 |
5.5%, with various maturities from 10/1/2023 until 8/1/2024 | 696,646 | 715,422 |
5.518%*, 2/1/2038 | 962,067 | 972,746 |
6.5%, 3/1/2026 | 1,261,082 | 1,329,313 |
7.0%, 1/1/2038 | 400,870 | 417,390 |
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | |
4.5%, 6/1/2034 | 942,222 | 957,496 |
5.0%, with various maturities from 2/1/2021 until 5/1/2034 | 2,696,107 | 2,766,544 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
5.166%*, 9/1/2038 | 881,106 | 893,001 |
5.458%*, 1/1/2038 | 1,080,059 | 1,103,891 |
5.5%, with various maturities from 1/1/2025 until 7/1/2037 | 14,265,130 | 14,608,005 |
6.0%, with various maturities from 4/1/2024 until 3/1/2025 | 1,287,328 | 1,335,000 |
6.5%, with various maturities from 3/1/2017 until 1/1/2038 | 4,692,261 | 4,883,148 |
8.0%, 9/1/2015 | 27,461 | 29,161 |
Total Mortgage-Backed Securities Pass-Throughs (Cost $29,878,224) | 30,840,138 |
|
Commercial and Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities 21.7% |
Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust, "3A31", Series 2005-10, 5.414%*, 1/25/2036 | 820,000 | 397,062 |
American Home Mortgage Investment Trust, "5A3", Series 2005-2, 5.077%, 9/25/2035 | 990,124 | 821,632 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., "A4", Series 2007-3, 5.658%*, 6/10/2049 | 1,085,000 | 793,540 |
Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., "1A20", Series 2005-3, 5.5%, 4/25/2035 | 1,095,000 | 913,932 |
Bear Stearns Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust: | | |
"A1", Series 2006-1, 4.625%*, 2/25/2036 | 1,681,536 | 1,066,877 |
"3A1", Series 2007-5, 5.98%*, 8/25/2047 | 1,514,696 | 877,432 |
Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities, "AAB", Series 2007-PW16, 5.712%*, 6/11/2040 | 1,200,000 | 860,543 |
Chase Mortgage Finance Corp., "3A1", Series 2007-A3, 5.98%*, 12/25/2037 | 844,049 | 547,737 |
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc., "2A1A", Series 2007-AR8, 5.912%*, 7/25/2037 | 648,531 | 382,525 |
Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, "A4", Series 2007-CD4, 5.322%, 12/11/2049 | 1,460,000 | 1,019,221 |
Countrywide Alternative Loan Trust: | | |
"1A1", Series 2004-2CB, 4.25%, 3/25/2034 | 251,106 | 219,831 |
"A1", Series 2004-1T1, 5.0%, 2/25/2034 | 278,089 | 234,253 |
"A2", Series 2002-18, 5.25%, 2/25/2033 | 577,033 | 503,326 |
"A2", Series 2003-21T1, 5.25%, 12/25/2033 | 481,789 | 420,871 |
"A2", Series 2004-1T1, 5.5%, 2/25/2034 | 184,689 | 157,015 |
Countrywide Home Loans: | | |
"A1", Series 2005-29, 5.75%, 12/25/2035 | 1,139,228 | 830,925 |
"A2", Series 2006-1, 6.0%, 3/25/2036 | 824,918 | 552,180 |
Credit Suisse Mortgage Capital Certificates, Inc.: | | |
"3A1", Series 2006-9, 6.0%, 11/25/2036 | 1,250,046 | 661,743 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
"3A19", Series 2007-5, 6.0%, 8/25/2037 | 1,044,058 | 845,035 |
CS First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., "10A3", Series 2005-10, 6.0%, 11/25/2035 | 209,125 | 161,067 |
GMAC Mortgage Corp. Loan Trust, "A1", Series 2006-J1, 5.75%, 4/25/2036 | 1,005,635 | 710,288 |
Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp.: | | |
"AM", Series 2007-GG9, 5.475%, 3/10/2039 | 1,025,000 | 519,432 |
"AJ", Series 2007-GG9, 5.505%, 3/10/2039 | 108,000 | 28,114 |
"A4", Series 2007-GG11, 5.736%, 12/10/2049 | 700,000 | 522,610 |
GS Mortgage Securities Corp. II: | | |
"AAB", Series 2007-GG10, 5.799%*, 8/10/2045 | 1,620,000 | 1,131,789 |
"J", Series 2007-GG10, 144A, 5.799%*, 8/10/2045 | 1,096,000 | 80,398 |
"K", Series 2007-GG10, 144A, 5.799%*, 8/10/2045 | 767,000 | 47,660 |
"AM", Series 2007-GG10, 5.799%*, 8/10/2045 | 225,000 | 103,040 |
"A4", Series 2007-GG10, 5.799%*, 8/10/2045 | 1,235,000 | 896,186 |
GSR Mortgage Loan Trust, "1A1", Series 2007-AR2, 5.775%*, 5/25/2047 | 1,118,821 | 575,185 |
Indymac Inda Mortgage Loan Trust, "1A2", Series 2007-AR1, 5.703%*, 3/25/2037 | 995,778 | 667,417 |
Indymac Index Mortgage Loan Trust, "3A1", Series 2006-AR33, 5.766%*, 1/25/2037 | 717,807 | 467,589 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.: | | |
"ASB", Series 2007-CB19, 5.73%*, 2/12/2049 | 880,000 | 638,654 |
"A4", Series 2007-LD11, 5.819%*, 6/15/2049 | 805,000 | 568,512 |
"F", Series 2007-LD11, 5.819%*, 6/15/2049 | 650,000 | 94,346 |
"G", Series 2007-LD11, 144A, 5.819%*, 6/15/2049 | 760,000 | 105,148 |
"H", Series 2007-LD11, 144A, 5.819%*, 6/15/2049 | 460,000 | 45,124 |
"E", Series 2007-LD11, 5.819%*, 6/15/2049 | 590,000 | 88,913 |
"ASB", Series 2007-LD12, 5.833%*, 2/15/2051 | 1,175,000 | 855,398 |
"A4", Series 2007-LD12, 5.882%*, 2/15/2051 | 575,000 | 408,911 |
"AM", Series 2007-LD12, 6.062%*, 2/15/2051 | 800,000 | 375,675 |
JPMorgan Mortgage Trust, "2A4", Series 2006-A2, 5.754%*, 4/25/2036 | 1,420,000 | 611,691 |
LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust, "A4", Series 2007-C6, 5.858%, 7/15/2040 | 690,000 | 490,950 |
Master Alternative Loans Trust: | | |
"5A1", Series 2005-2, 6.5%, 12/25/2034 | 103,844 | 61,105 |
"8A1", Series 2004-3, 7.0%, 4/25/2034 | 18,972 | 14,128 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, "A2", Series 2005-A5, 4.566%, 6/25/2035 | 105,000 | 60,288 |
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, "ASB", Series 2007-C1, 5.829%*, 6/12/2050 | 590,000 | 420,302 |
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, "ASB", Series 2007-5, 5.362%, 8/12/2048 | 1,000,000 | 705,684 |
Morgan Stanley Capital I: | | |
"AM", Series 2007-HQ12, 5.632%*, 4/12/2049 | 600,000 | 275,268 |
"AAB", Series 2007-IQ14, 5.654%, 4/15/2049 | 1,105,000 | 786,085 |
New York Mortgage Trust, "2A3", Series 2006-1, 5.652%*, 5/25/2036 | 1,100,000 | 546,424 |
Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., "CB", Series 2004-QS2, 5.75%, 2/25/2034 | 489,789 | 308,261 |
Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust: | | |
"1A4", Series 2005-22, 5.25%, 12/25/2035 | 1,160,000 | 429,604 |
"6A3", Series 2005-21, 5.4%, 11/25/2035 | 740,000 | 307,107 |
"7A4", Series 2006-1, 5.62%, 2/25/2036 | 930,000 | 361,805 |
Structured Asset Securities Corp., "2A1", Series 2003-1, 6.0%, 2/25/2018 | 3,722 | 3,564 |
SunTrust Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, "3A1", Series 2007-4, 5.993%*, 10/25/2037 | 1,517,528 | 989,329 |
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust: | | |
"APB", Series 2007-C30, 5.294%, 12/15/2043 | 610,000 | 429,741 |
"H", Series 2007-C32, 144A, 5.741%*, 6/15/2049 | 770,000 | 74,447 |
"ABP", Series 2007-C32, 5.741%*, 6/15/2049 | 720,000 | 516,576 |
Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Trust: | | |
"1A3", Series 2005-AR16, 5.102%*, 12/25/2035 | 825,000 | 440,113 |
"1A1", Series 2006-AR18, 5.339%*, 1/25/2037 | 1,105,673 | 622,858 |
"4A1", Series 2007-HY3, 5.347%*, 3/25/2037 | 1,492,793 | 854,087 |
"2A3", Series 2006-AR6, 5.948%*, 8/25/2036 | 1,055,000 | 484,944 |
Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities Trust: | | |
"B1", Series 2005-AR12, 4.362%*, 7/25/2035 | 755,886 | 242,760 |
"2A5", Series 2006-AR2, 5.093%*, 3/25/2036 | 2,388,990 | 1,480,531 |
"A4", Series 2005-AR14, 5.387%*, 8/25/2035 | 945,000 | 483,934 |
"2A5", Series 2006-AR1, 5.548%*, 3/25/2036 | 935,000 | 374,861 |
Total Commercial and Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost $55,383,179) | 33,573,583 |
|
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations 7.5% |
Fannie Mae Whole Loan, "1A1", Series 2004-W15, 6.0%, 8/25/2044 | 271,150 | 281,813 |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | |
"WJ", Series 2557, 5.0%, 7/15/2014 | 213,535 | 214,985 |
"TA", Series 2750, 5.0%, 2/15/2032 | 1,010,000 | 1,031,985 |
"PD", Series 2774, 5.0%, 8/15/2032 | 1,010,000 | 1,032,001 |
"ME", Series 2775, 5.0%, 12/15/2032 | 460,000 | 469,978 |
"EG", Series 2836, 5.0%, 12/15/2032 | 1,580,000 | 1,612,718 |
"PD", Series 2893, 5.0%, 2/15/2033 | 800,000 | 816,021 |
"OG", Series 2889, 5.0%, 5/15/2033 | 685,000 | 698,229 |
"PE", Series 2898, 5.0%, 5/15/2033 | 335,000 | 341,515 |
"PD", Series 2939, 5.0%, 7/15/2033 | 535,000 | 543,582 |
"KG", Series 2987, 5.0%, 12/15/2034 | 1,470,000 | 1,488,632 |
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | |
"EG", Series 2005-22, 5.0%, 11/25/2033 | 750,000 | 761,479 |
"WD", Series 2005-86, 5.0%, 3/25/2034 | 1,525,000 | 1,550,845 |
"PG", Series 2002-3, 5.5%, 2/25/2017 | 424,841 | 434,090 |
"TC", Series 2007-77, 5.5%, 9/25/2034 | 370,000 | 380,162 |
"ZQ", Series G92-9, 7.0%, 12/25/2021 | 19,200 | 19,211 |
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (Cost $11,256,691) | 11,677,246 |
|
Government & Agency Obligations 12.0% |
Sovereign Bonds 2.0% |
Dominican Republic, REG S, 8.625%, 4/20/2027 | 200,000 | 102,000 |
Government of Indonesia: | | |
REG S, 8.5%, 10/12/2035 | 100,000 | 83,912 |
Series FR-49, 9.0%, 9/15/2013 IDR | 700,000,000 | 56,344 |
Series FR-23, 11.0%, 12/15/2012 IDR | 1,600,000,000 | 141,885 |
Series FR-18, 13.175%, 7/15/2012 IDR | 270,000,000 | 25,462 |
Series FR-16, 13.45%, 8/15/2011 IDR | 480,000,000 | 45,188 |
Government of Ukraine, REG S, 6.75%, 11/14/2017 | 390,000 | 142,754 |
Mexican Bonds: | | |
Series A, 6.05%, 1/11/2040 | 90,000 | 87,300 |
Series M-10, 7.25%, 12/15/2016 MXN | 800,000 | 55,359 |
Series M-20, 10.0%, 12/5/2024 MXN | 700,000 | 58,063 |
Series M-30, 10.0%, 11/20/2036 MXN | 1,700,000 | 144,755 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Nota do Tesouro Nacional, 10.0%, 1/1/2017 BRL | 810,000 | 303,096 |
Republic of Argentina: | | |
GDP Linked Note, 12/15/2035 | 410,000 | 9,835 |
3.0%*, 4/30/2013 | 43,750 | 23,577 |
Series X, 7.0%, 4/17/2017 | 260,000 | 90,249 |
Republic of Egypt, 9.1%, 9/20/2012 EGP | 230,000 | 38,818 |
Republic of El Salvador: | | |
REG S, 7.65%, 6/15/2035 | 90,000 | 57,600 |
REG S, 8.25%, 4/10/2032 | 40,000 | 26,000 |
Republic of Georgia, 7.5%, 4/15/2013 | 170,000 | 98,812 |
Republic of Panama: | | |
6.7%, 1/26/2036 | 170,000 | 153,000 |
7.125%, 1/29/2026 | 220,000 | 207,350 |
7.25%, 3/15/2015 | 80,000 | 81,600 |
Republic of Philippines: | | |
7.75%, 1/14/2031 | 100,000 | 101,000 |
8.25%, 1/15/2014 | 70,000 | 72,800 |
9.0%, 2/15/2013 | 120,000 | 127,200 |
9.5%, 2/2/2030 | 60,000 | 67,200 |
Republic of Serbia, REG S, Step-up Coupon, 3.75% to 11/1/2009, 6.75% to 11/1/2024 | 90,000 | 54,000 |
Republic of Turkey: | | |
Series CPI, 10.0%, 2/15/2012 TRY | 190,045 | 112,045 |
16.0%, 3/7/2012 TRY | 220,000 | 139,683 |
Republic of Uruguay: | | |
7.625%, 3/21/2036 | 10,000 | 8,400 |
7.875%, 1/15/2033 (PIK) | 160,000 | 137,600 |
8.0%, 11/18/2022 | 70,000 | 64,750 |
State of Qatar, REG S, 9.75%, 6/15/2030 | 140,000 | 172,200 |
| 3,089,837 |
US Government Sponsored Agencies 0.9% |
Federal National Mortgage Association, 6.625%, 11/15/2030 (b) | 950,000 | 1,371,612 |
US Treasury Obligations 9.1% |
US Treasury Bill, 0.13%**, 6/18/2009 | 327,000 | 326,759 |
US Treasury Bonds: | | |
4.75%, 2/15/2037 | 460,000 | 640,981 |
8.125%, 8/15/2019 (b) | 5,590,000 | 8,261,847 |
US Treasury Notes: | | |
1.75%, 11/15/2011 (b) | 3,750,000 | 3,835,537 |
3.5%, 2/15/2018 | 560,000 | 619,850 |
4.5%, 4/30/2012 | 400,000 | 443,000 |
| 14,127,974 |
Total Government & Agency Obligations (Cost $18,990,198) | 18,589,423 |
|
Municipal Bonds and Notes 5.1% |
Alameda, CA, Corridor Transportation Authority Revenue, Series C, 6.6%, 10/1/2029 (c) | 525,000 | 483,903 |
Chicago, IL, Transit Authority, Transfer Tax Receipts Revenue, Series B, 6.3%, 12/1/2021 | 1,200,000 | 1,181,412 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Florida, State Board of Education, Capital Outlay 2006, Series E, 5.0%, 6/1/2035 | 465,000 | 442,099 |
Gwinnett County, GA, Development Authority Revenue, Gwinnett Stadium Project, 6.4%, 1/1/2028 | 655,000 | 647,487 |
Jicarilla, NM, Sales & Special Tax Revenue, Apache Nation Revenue, 144A, 5.2%, 12/1/2013 | 670,000 | 684,499 |
Los Angeles, CA, Community Development Agency Tax Allocation Revenue, Adelante Eastside Project, Series C, 6.49%, 9/1/2037 (c) | 325,000 | 245,788 |
McLennan County, TX, Junior College, 5.0%, 8/15/2032 (c) | 340,000 | 320,651 |
New Jersey, Economic Development Authority Revenue, Series B, 6.5%, 11/1/2013 (c) | 860,000 | 900,067 |
Port Authority New York & New Jersey, One Hundred Fiftieth Series, 4.75%, 9/15/2016 | 930,000 | 849,034 |
Rhode Island, Convention Center Authority Revenue, Civic Center, Series A, 6.06%, 5/15/2035 (c) | 515,000 | 492,664 |
Virgin Islands, Port Authority Marine Revenue, Series B, 5.08%, 9/1/2013 (c) | 1,420,000 | 1,428,222 |
Washington, Central Puget Sound, Regional Transit Authority, Sales & Use Tax Revenue, Series A, 5.0%, 11/1/2036 | 285,000 | 267,102 |
Total Municipal Bonds and Notes (Cost $8,179,659) | 7,942,928 |
|
Loan Participations and Assignments 0.1% |
Sovereign Loans |
Gazprombank, 7.25%, 2/22/2010 RUB | 2,000,000 | 48,148 |
Russian Agricultural Bank, REG S, 7.75%, 5/29/2018 | 100,000 | 63,732 |
Total Loan Participations and Assignments (Cost $177,519) | 111,880 |
|
Preferred Securities 2.0% |
Financials |
Bank of America Corp.: | | |
Series K, 8.0%, 1/30/2018 (d) | 390,000 | 280,522 |
Series M, 8.125%, 5/15/2018 (d) | 705,000 | 527,340 |
Citigroup Capital XXI, 8.3%, 12/21/2057 | 490,000 | 377,906 |
Citigroup, Inc., Series E, 8.4%, 4/30/2018 (d) | 628,000 | 414,662 |
ComEd Financing III, 6.35%, 3/15/2033 | 238,000 | 149,150 |
PNC Preferred Funding Trust I, 144A, 8.7%, 3/15/2013 (d) | 700,000 | 517,433 |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC: | | |
144A, 6.99%, 10/5/2017(d) | 800,000 | 374,029 |
Series U, 7.64%, 9/29/2017 (d) | 1,000,000 | 398,284 |
Total Preferred Securities (Cost $4,236,666) | 3,039,326 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Preferred Stocks 0.2% |
Financials |
XL Capital Ltd., Series C, 6.102% | 21,600 | 220,679 |
Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 7.375% | 1,180 | 12,744 |
Total Preferred Stocks (Cost $552,242) | 233,423 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 8.0% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 1.69% (e) (f) (Cost $12,381,645) | 12,381,645 | 12,381,645 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Cash Equivalents 5.8% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 1.42% (e) (Cost $8,910,588) | 8,910,588 | 8,910,588 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $194,531,530)+ | 107.3 | 166,050,202 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (7.3) | (11,226,690) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 154,823,512 |
* Floating rate notes are securities whose yields vary with a designated market index or market rate, such as the coupon-equivalent of the US Treasury bill rate. These securities are shown at their current rate as of December 31, 2008.** Annualized yield at time of purchase; not a coupon rate.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $194,554,381. At December 31, 2008, net unrealized depreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $28,504,179. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $3,482,477 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $31,986,656.(a) Principal amount stated in US dollars unless otherwise noted.(b) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2008 amounted to $11,972,348, which is 7.7% of net assets.(c) Bond is insured by one of these companies:Insurance Coverage | As a % of Total Investment Portfolio |
Assured Guaranty Corp.
| 0.5 |
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.
| 1.4 |
MBIA Corp.
| 0.3 |
Radian
| 0.1 |
(d) Date shown is call date; not a maturity date for the perpetual preferred securities.(e) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(f) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.144A: Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.
PIK: Denotes that all or a portion of the income is paid in kind.
REG S: Securities sold under Regulation S may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, US persons, except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933.
REIT: Real Estate Investment Trust
As of December 31, 2008, the Portfolio had the following open forward foreign currency exchange contracts:
Contracts to Deliver | | In Exchange For | | Settlement Date | | Unrealized Appreciation ($) |
JPY
| 623,043 |
| AUD
| 11,000 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| 324 |
AUD
| 38,551 |
| JPY
| 2,553,509 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| 1,937 |
RUB
| 2,607,000 |
| USD
| 89,297 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| 7,271 |
NZD
| 351,000 |
| USD
| 213,837 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| 9,494 |
USD
| 398,069 |
| NZD
| 729,000 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| 26,336 |
TRY
| 278,000 |
| USD
| 195,651 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| 17,203 |
MXN
| 1,622,000 |
| USD
| 134,803 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| 18,657 |
USD
| 233,775 |
| EUR
| 184,000 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| 21,721 |
Total unrealized appreciation | 102,943 |
Contracts to Deliver | | In Exchange For | | Settlement Date | | Unrealized Depreciation ($) |
USD
| 275,234 |
| NOK
| 1,689,000 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (34,459) |
USD
| 80,185 |
| UAH
| 416,000 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (26,810) |
AUD
| 349,000 |
| USD
| 226,569 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (16,106) |
BRL
| 338,000 |
| USD
| 134,324 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (9,256) |
EUR
| 184,000 |
| USD
| 251,473 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (4,022) |
USD
| 214,682 |
| AUD
| 305,000 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (2,603) |
IDR
| 845,167,000 |
| USD
| 74,333 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (2,130) |
JPY
| 2,163,509 |
| USD
| 22,690 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (1,188) |
USD
| 23,182 |
| AUD
| 33,000 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (866) |
NZD
| 378,000 |
| USD
| 219,494 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (568) |
JPY
| 390,000 |
| USD
| 3,852 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (453) |
NOK
| 1,689,000 |
| USD
| 240,489 |
| 1/23/2009 |
| (286) |
Total unrealized depreciation | (98,747) |
Currency Abbreviations |
AUD Australian Dollar BRL Brazilian Real EGP Egyptian Pound EUR Euro IDR Indonesian Rupiah JPY Japanese Yen MXN Mexican Peso NOK Norwegian Krone NZD New Zealand Dollar RUB Russian Ruble TRY Turkish Lira UAH Ukraine Hryvna USD United States Dollar
|
Included in the portfolio are investments in mortgage or asset-backed securities which are interests in separate pools of mortgages or assets. Effective maturities of these investments may be shorter than stated maturities due to prepayments. Some separate investments in the Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. issues have similar coupon rates and have been aggregated for presentation purposes in the investment portfolio.
Fair Value Measurements
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the Portfolio's investments. For information on the Portfolio's policy regarding the valuation of investments and of the valuation inputs, and the aggregate levels used in the tables below, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | Investments in Securities | Other Financial Instruments++ |
Level 1
| $ 12,394,389 | $ — |
Level 2
| 153,306,176 | 4,196 |
Level 3
| 349,637 | — |
Total | $ 166,050,202 | $ 4,196 |
++ Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in the Investment Portfolio, such as forward foreign currency exchange contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument.The following is a reconciliation of the Portfolio's Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used in determining value at December 31, 2008:
| Investments in Securities |
Balance as of January 1, 2008 | $ 1,298,669 |
Total realized gain (loss)
| (131,401) |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (481,826) |
Amortization Premium/Discount
| (930) |
Net purchases (sales)
| (334,875) |
Net transfers in (out) of Level 3
| — |
Balance as of December 31, 2008 | $ 349,637 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2008
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $173,239,297), including $11,972,348 of securities loaned | $ 144,757,969 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $12,381,645)* | 12,381,645 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $8,910,588) | 8,910,588 |
Total investments, at value (cost $194,531,530)
| 166,050,202 |
Cash
| 9,960 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $49,360)
| 49,043 |
Receivable for investments sold
| 329,776 |
Dividends receivable
| 563 |
Interest receivable
| 1,515,002 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 5,909 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 6,132 |
Net receivable on closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts
| 13,927 |
Unrealized appreciation on open forward foreign currency exchange contracts
| 102,943 |
Other assets
| 5,559 |
Total assets
| 168,089,016 |
Liabilities |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 626,892 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 12,381,645 |
Unrealized depreciation on open forward foreign currency exchange contracts
| 98,747 |
Accrued management fee
| 47,703 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 110,517 |
Total liabilities
| 13,265,504 |
Net assets, at value | $ 154,823,512 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 11,846,280 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | (28,481,328) |
Foreign currency | 2,245 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| (21,419,194) |
Paid-in capital
| 192,875,509 |
Net assets, at value | $ 154,823,512 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($154,823,512 ÷ 28,147,936 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 5.50 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
Investment Income |
Dividends
| $ 40,393 |
Interest (net of foreign taxes withheld of $2,141)
| 12,376,086 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 132,373 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 191,513 |
Total Income
| 12,740,365 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 782,296 |
Administration fee
| 200,589 |
Custodian fee
| 41,210 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 506 |
Services to shareholders
| 1,629 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 202 |
Professional fees
| 85,778 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 6,830 |
Reports to shareholders
| 41,760 |
Other
| 33,183 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 1,193,983 |
Expense reductions
| (1,769) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 1,192,214 |
Net investment income | 11,548,151 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments (net of foreign taxes of $1,058)
| (20,123,676) |
Futures
| 226,776 |
Foreign currency
| 331,617 |
Payments by affiliates (see Note H)
| 221 |
| (19,565,062) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (26,247,691) |
Foreign currency
| (35,300) |
| (26,282,991) |
Net gain (loss) | (45,848,053) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ (34,299,902) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
| Years Ended December 31, |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2008 | 2007 |
Operations: Net investment income
| $ 11,548,151 | $ 11,251,529 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| (19,565,062) | (121,794) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (26,282,991) | (1,978,095) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| (34,299,902) | 9,151,640 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (10,882,399) | (10,313,794) |
Class B | (31,809) | (83,297) |
Total distributions
| (10,914,208) | (10,397,091) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 21,447,131 | 38,092,545 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 10,882,399 | 10,313,794 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (61,233,965) | (36,534,184) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (28,904,435) | 11,872,155 |
Class B* Proceeds from shares sold
| 292,257 | 1,299,403 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 31,809 | 83,297 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (890,260) | (2,108,764) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (566,194) | (726,064) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (74,684,739) | 9,900,640 |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 229,508,251 | 219,607,611 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $11,846,280 and $10,802,062, respectively)
| $ 154,823,512 | $ 229,508,251 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 32,791,859 | 31,026,023 |
Shares sold
| 3,262,319 | 5,515,644 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 1,674,215 | 1,510,072 |
Shares redeemed
| (9,580,457) | (5,259,880) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (4,643,923) | 1,765,836 |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 28,147,936 | 32,791,859 |
Class B* Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 87,887 | 198,161 |
Shares sold
| 42,354 | 183,436 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 4,894 | 12,196 |
Shares redeemed
| (135,135) | (305,906) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (87,887) | (110,274) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| — | 87,887 |
* On May 22, 2008 Class B shares were liquidated.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 6.98 | $ 7.03 | $ 6.99 | $ 7.13 | $ 7.04 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment incomea | .37 | .35 | .33 | .29 | .29 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (1.48) | (.06) | (.01) | (.10) | .08 |
Total from investment operations | (1.11) | .29 | .32 | .19 | .37 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.37) | (.34) | (.27) | (.26) | (.28) |
Net realized gains | — | — | (.01) | (.07) | — |
Total distributions | (.37) | (.34) | (.28) | (.33) | (.28) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 5.50 | $ 6.98 | $ 7.03 | $ 6.99 | $ 7.13 |
Total Return (%)
| (16.77) | 4.18 | 4.72b | 2.60 | 5.38 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 155 | 229 | 218 | 209 | 177 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .59 | .61 | .66 | .68 | .60 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .59 | .61 | .62 | .68 | .60 |
Ratio of net investment income (%)
| 5.76 | 5.03 | 4.82 | 4.11 | 4.18 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 196 | 185 | 186 | 197 | 245 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Growth & Income VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2008 are 0.54% and 0.79% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2008.
Portfolio returns during all periods shown reflect a fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
The Portfolio is subject to stock market risk, meaning stocks in the Portfolio may decline in value for extended periods of time due to the activities and financial prospects of individual companies, or due to general market and economic conditions. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific information regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Growth & Income VIP — Class A [] Russell 1000 ® Index | The Russell 1000® Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e96a/8e96ae60542a4e8187ecb0666fa3237fa25d2cbd" alt="dvs1_g10k650" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Growth & Income VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $6,169 | $7,105 | $8,301 | $7,431 |
Average annual total return
| -38.31% | -10.77% | -3.65% | -2.93% |
Russell 1000 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $6,240 | $7,621 | $9,022 | $8,963 |
Average annual total return
| -37.60% | -8.66% | -2.04% | -1.09% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $6,171 | $7,060 | $8,195 | $7,238 |
Average annual total return
| -38.29% | -10.95% | -3.90% | -3.18% |
Russell 1000 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $6,240 | $7,621 | $9,022 | $8,963 |
Average annual total return
| -37.60% | -8.66% | -2.04% | -1.09% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Growth & Income VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, the Portfolio limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
• Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
• Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2008 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 691.90 | | $ 693.80 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.30 | | $ 2.90 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 1,022.42 | | $ 1,021.72 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.75 | | $ 3.46 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 366.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Growth & Income VIP
| .54% | | .68% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Growth & Income VIP
The year just ended was the worst in many decades for the US equity markets. Essentially all equity indices posted negative returns for this period, as markets reflected economic problems including a housing slump, rising unemployment, a crisis of confidence and an extreme credit crunch. The Russell 3000® Index, which is generally regarded as a good indicator of the broad stock market, had a negative return of -37.31% for the 12 months ended December 31, 2008. With a return of -38.31% during the period ended December 31, 2008 (Class A shares, unadjusted for contract charges), the Portfolio's return was in line with that of the Russell 1000® Index, which posted a return of -37.60%.
Contributors to the Portfolio's relative performance were underweights and stock selection in the financials and consumer discretionary sectors.1 In the financials sector, the Portfolio's performance benefited from not owning many of the worst-performing stocks. In the consumer discretionary sector, performance benefited from overweight positions in The DIRECTV Group, Inc., AutoZone, Inc. and McDonald's Corp.
A detractor from the Portfolio's relative performance was stock selection in the energy and materials sectors. In the energy sector, performance was hurt by an underweight position in ExxonMobil Corp., which was down less than the sector, and by overweights in coal producers Walter Industries, Inc. and Massey Energy Co. In the materials sector, overweight positions in Terra Industries Inc. and CF Industries Holdings Inc., both of which produce fertilizer and other agricultural products, detracted from performance.
Robert Wang James B. Francis, CFA
Julie Abbett
Portfolio Managers
The Russell 3000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 3,000 largest US companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable US equity market.
The Russell 1000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
1 "Overweight" means the portfolio holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. "Underweight" means the portfolio holds a lower weighting.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2008, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Growth & Income VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio Excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 97% | 97% |
Cash Equivalents | 2% | 3% |
Government & Agency Obligation | 1% | — |
| 100% | 100% |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Common Stocks) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Health Care | 16% | 14% |
Information Technology | 16% | 15% |
Industrials | 14% | 13% |
Consumer Staples | 13% | 9% |
Energy | 12% | 14% |
Financials | 11% | 15% |
Consumer Discretionary | 10% | 11% |
Telecommunication Services | 4% | 4% |
Materials | 2% | 3% |
Utilities | 2% | 2% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation and sector diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 28. A complete list of portfolio holdings of the Portfolio is posted as of the month end on www.dws-investments.com on or about the 15th day of the following month. More frequent posting of portfolio holdings information may be made from time to time on www.dws-investments.com.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2008
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 97.0% |
Consumer Discretionary 9.6% |
Auto Components 0.1% |
Autoliv, Inc. | 2,700 | 57,942 |
Lear Corp.* | 20,300 | 28,623 |
| 86,565 |
Hotels Restaurants & Leisure 1.7% |
McDonald's Corp. | 19,800 | 1,231,362 |
Yum! Brands, Inc. | 13,500 | 425,250 |
| 1,656,612 |
Household Durables 0.2% |
Leggett & Platt, Inc. | 15,800 | 240,002 |
Internet & Catalog Retail 0.3% |
Amazon.com, Inc.* | 5,800 | 297,424 |
Leisure Equipment & Products 0.2% |
Hasbro, Inc. | 7,000 | 204,190 |
Media 3.6% |
Comcast Corp. "A" | 91,900 | 1,551,272 |
Comcast Corp., Special "A" | 24,500 | 395,675 |
DISH Network Corp. "A"* | 17,700 | 196,293 |
Liberty Media Corp. Entertainment "A"* | 7,100 | 124,108 |
The DIRECTV Group, Inc.* | 51,100 | 1,170,701 |
| 3,438,049 |
Specialty Retail 3.4% |
AutoZone, Inc.* | 6,100 | 850,767 |
Best Buy Co., Inc. (a) | 27,500 | 773,025 |
Children's Place Retail Stores, Inc.* | 2,800 | 60,704 |
RadioShack Corp. | 27,000 | 322,380 |
Rent-A-Center, Inc.* | 6,000 | 105,900 |
The Gap, Inc. | 30,000 | 401,700 |
TJX Companies, Inc. | 35,200 | 724,064 |
| 3,238,540 |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods 0.1% |
Quiksilver, Inc.* | 16,100 | 29,624 |
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. | 2,900 | 61,016 |
| 90,640 |
Consumer Staples 12.7% |
Beverages 1.5% |
Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. | 9,100 | 204,841 |
PepsiCo, Inc. | 21,900 | 1,199,463 |
| 1,404,304 |
Food & Staples Retailing 3.9% |
Kroger Co. | 49,300 | 1,302,013 |
Pantry, Inc.* | 1,400 | 30,030 |
Sysco Corp. | 12,500 | 286,750 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 39,000 | 2,186,340 |
| 3,805,133 |
Food Products 1.6% |
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. | 6,800 | 196,044 |
Bunge Ltd. | 4,900 | 253,673 |
Chiquita Brands International, Inc.* | 13,300 | 196,574 |
Darling International, Inc.* | 9,200 | 50,508 |
Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.* | 9,900 | 221,958 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
General Mills, Inc. | 10,700 | 650,025 |
| 1,568,782 |
Household Products 3.6% |
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | 1,700 | 95,404 |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 27,400 | 1,877,996 |
Procter & Gamble Co. | 23,500 | 1,452,770 |
| 3,426,170 |
Personal Products 0.2% |
Herbalife Ltd. (a) | 7,800 | 169,104 |
Tobacco 1.9% |
Altria Group, Inc. | 50,520 | 760,831 |
Philip Morris International, Inc. | 24,700 | 1,074,697 |
| 1,835,528 |
Energy 11.1% |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.* | 10,700 | 173,233 |
Apache Corp. | 23,400 | 1,744,002 |
Arch Coal, Inc. | 18,200 | 296,478 |
Chevron Corp. | 9,700 | 717,509 |
Cimarex Energy Co. | 16,600 | 444,548 |
ConocoPhillips | 4,700 | 243,460 |
Encore Acquisition Co.* | 21,200 | 541,024 |
ExxonMobil Corp. | 7,739 | 617,804 |
Frontline Ltd. (a) | 27,300 | 808,353 |
Hess Corp. | 27,600 | 1,480,464 |
Mariner Energy, Inc.* | 22,400 | 228,480 |
Massey Energy Co. | 24,400 | 336,476 |
McMoRan Exploration Co.* (a) | 27,500 | 269,500 |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 31,400 | 1,883,686 |
W&T Offshore, Inc. | 17,800 | 254,896 |
Walter Industries, Inc. | 39,800 | 696,898 |
| 10,736,811 |
Financials 11.1% |
Capital Markets 2.3% |
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. | 56,000 | 1,586,480 |
State Street Corp. | 16,100 | 633,213 |
| 2,219,693 |
Commercial Banks 2.1% |
Banco Itau Holding Financeira SA (ADR) (Preferred) | 24,100 | 279,560 |
Unibanco — Uniao de Bancos Brasileiros SA (ADR) | 6,100 | 394,182 |
Wells Fargo & Co. | 44,800 | 1,320,704 |
| 1,994,446 |
Consumer Finance 0.1% |
Cash America International, Inc. | 2,300 | 62,905 |
Diversified Financial Services 2.2% |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 68,800 | 2,169,264 |
Insurance 4.0% |
ACE Ltd. | 32,100 | 1,698,732 |
Aflac, Inc. | 5,600 | 256,704 |
Allied World Assurance Co. Holdings Ltd. | 2,200 | 89,320 |
Aon Corp. | 7,200 | 328,896 |
Arch Capital Group Ltd.* | 1,100 | 77,110 |
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 2,600 | 67,366 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Assurant, Inc. | 3,700 | 111,000 |
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. "B"* | 200 | 642,800 |
The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 6,700 | 302,840 |
Unum Group | 4,500 | 83,700 |
XL Capital Ltd. "A" (a) | 51,100 | 189,070 |
| 3,847,538 |
Real Estate Investment Trusts 0.4% |
Boston Properties, Inc. (REIT) | 1,600 | 88,000 |
Essex Property Trust, Inc. (REIT) | 1,800 | 138,150 |
Rayonier, Inc. (REIT) (a) | 3,700 | 115,995 |
Simon Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 1,600 | 85,008 |
| 427,153 |
Health Care 16.1% |
Biotechnology 2.7% |
Amgen, Inc.* | 2,200 | 127,050 |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.* | 35,700 | 1,825,698 |
OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 15,700 | 613,085 |
| 2,565,833 |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies 2.8% |
Baxter International, Inc. | 26,200 | 1,404,058 |
Becton, Dickinson & Co. | 14,200 | 971,138 |
Covidien Ltd. | 6,000 | 217,440 |
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.* | 2,600 | 49,868 |
Varian Medical Systems, Inc.* | 1,300 | 45,552 |
| 2,688,056 |
Health Care Providers & Services 4.5% |
Aetna, Inc. | 53,400 | 1,521,900 |
Express Scripts, Inc.* | 24,500 | 1,347,010 |
Humana, Inc.* | 13,400 | 499,552 |
Kindred Healthcare, Inc.* | 5,400 | 70,308 |
Magellan Health Services, Inc.* | 700 | 27,412 |
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.* | 20,500 | 859,155 |
Universal Health Services, Inc. "B" | 1,600 | 60,112 |
| 4,385,449 |
Pharmaceuticals 6.1% |
Abbott Laboratories | 13,200 | 704,484 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 43,000 | 1,731,610 |
Johnson & Johnson | 11,700 | 700,011 |
Merck & Co., Inc. | 25,000 | 760,000 |
Perrigo Co. | 1,100 | 35,541 |
Pfizer, Inc. | 28,700 | 508,277 |
Schering-Plough Corp. | 72,500 | 1,234,675 |
Sepracor, Inc.* | 6,900 | 75,762 |
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (ADR) | 3,500 | 148,995 |
| 5,899,355 |
Industrials 13.3% |
Aerospace & Defense 3.4% |
General Dynamics Corp. | 9,900 | 570,141 |
Goodrich Corp. | 9,900 | 366,498 |
Honeywell International, Inc. | 41,520 | 1,363,102 |
L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. | 6,500 | 479,570 |
Lockheed Martin Corp. | 2,600 | 218,608 |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | 5,200 | 234,208 |
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. "A"* | 3,700 | 37,629 |
| 3,269,756 |
Commercial Services & Supplies 0.3% |
The Brink's Co. | 10,400 | 279,552 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Construction & Engineering 1.5% |
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV (NY Registered Shares) | 3,000 | 30,150 |
EMCOR Group, Inc.* | 16,400 | 367,852 |
Fluor Corp. | 11,400 | 511,518 |
Foster Wheeler Ltd.* | 15,300 | 357,714 |
Perini Corp.* | 9,500 | 222,110 |
| 1,489,344 |
Electrical Equipment 1.1% |
Acuity Brands, Inc. | 1,400 | 48,874 |
Energy Conversion Devices, Inc.* | 11,800 | 297,478 |
GrafTech International Ltd.* | 77,100 | 641,472 |
Woodward Governor Co. | 2,100 | 48,342 |
| 1,036,166 |
Industrial Conglomerates 0.1% |
General Electric Co. | 5,450 | 88,290 |
Machinery 4.2% |
AGCO Corp.* (a) | 23,400 | 552,006 |
Caterpillar, Inc. | 24,600 | 1,098,882 |
CNH Global NV | 3,600 | 56,160 |
Cummins, Inc. | 21,200 | 566,676 |
Dover Corp. | 2,200 | 72,424 |
Flowserve Corp. | 6,500 | 334,750 |
Gardner Denver, Inc.* | 1,500 | 35,010 |
Joy Global, Inc. | 9,700 | 222,033 |
Parker Hannifin Corp. | 24,400 | 1,037,976 |
Trinity Industries, Inc. | 5,500 | 86,680 |
| 4,062,597 |
Road & Rail 2.7% |
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. | 12,900 | 976,659 |
Norfolk Southern Corp. | 15,000 | 705,750 |
Ryder System, Inc. | 22,600 | 876,428 |
| 2,558,837 |
Information Technology 15.1% |
Communications Equipment 0.3% |
Cisco Systems, Inc.* | 18,500 | 301,550 |
Computers & Peripherals 6.5% |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 54,900 | 1,992,321 |
International Business Machines Corp. | 24,500 | 2,061,920 |
Lexmark International, Inc. "A"* | 29,000 | 780,100 |
QLogic Corp.* | 38,200 | 513,408 |
Western Digital Corp.* | 82,600 | 945,770 |
| 6,293,519 |
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components 0.4% |
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. "A"* (a) | 3,200 | 104,832 |
Jabil Circuit, Inc. | 38,200 | 257,850 |
| 362,682 |
Internet Software & Services 1.4% |
eBay, Inc.* | 16,470 | 229,921 |
Google, Inc. "A"* | 3,520 | 1,082,928 |
Yahoo!, Inc.* | 4,200 | 51,240 |
| 1,364,089 |
IT Services 3.5% |
Accenture Ltd. "A" | 28,600 | 937,794 |
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 23,800 | 936,292 |
Computer Sciences Corp.* | 19,000 | 667,660 |
Visa, Inc. "A" | 16,000 | 839,200 |
| 3,380,946 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Software 3.0% |
Microsoft Corp. | 139,375 | 2,709,450 |
Symantec Corp.* | 12,230 | 165,350 |
| 2,874,800 |
Materials 2.3% |
Chemicals |
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 19,700 | 968,452 |
Terra Industries, Inc. | 72,700 | 1,211,909 |
The Mosaic Co. | 2,500 | 86,500 |
| 2,266,861 |
Telecommunication Services 3.9% |
Diversified Telecommunication Services |
AT&T, Inc. | 41,380 | 1,179,330 |
Embarq Corp. | 21,300 | 765,948 |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | 52,700 | 1,786,530 |
| 3,731,808 |
Utilities 1.8% |
Electric Utilities 0.6% |
Duke Energy Corp. | 2,700 | 40,527 |
Edison International | 8,200 | 263,384 |
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. | 1,100 | 24,354 |
Pepco Holdings, Inc. | 5,000 | 88,800 |
Portland General Electric Co. | 1,500 | 29,205 |
Southern Co. | 3,800 | 140,600 |
| 586,870 |
Gas Utilities 0.3% |
Atmos Energy Corp. | 1,600 | 37,920 |
ONEOK, Inc. | 6,500 | 189,280 |
UGI Corp. | 1,400 | 34,188 |
| 261,388 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders 0.4% |
AES Corp.* | 45,600 | 375,744 |
Multi-Utilities 0.5% |
Dominion Resources, Inc. | 7,500 | 268,800 |
Integrys Energy Group, Inc. | 1,300 | 55,874 |
Sempra Energy | 2,700 | 115,101 |
TECO Energy, Inc. | 2,100 | 25,935 |
| 465,710 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $123,483,787) | 93,508,055 |
| Principal Amount ($) | Value ($) |
| |
Government & Agency Obligation 0.7% |
US Treasury Obligation |
US Treasury Bill, 0.17%**, 1/15/2009 (b) (Cost $685,955) | 686,000 | 685,997 |
|
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Securities Lending Collateral 1.9% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 1.69% (c) (d) (Cost $1,836,942) | 1,836,942 | 1,836,942 |
|
Cash Equivalents 2.1% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 1.42% (c) (Cost $1,992,006) | 1,992,006 | 1,992,006 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $127,998,690) + | 101.7 | 98,023,000 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (1.7) | (1,667,905) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 96,355,095 |
* Non-income producing security.** Annualized yield at time of purchase; not a coupon rate.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $130,913,694. At December 31, 2008, net unrealized depreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $32,890,694. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $2,992,031 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $35,882,725.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2008 amounted to $1,842,633, which is 1.9% of net assets.(b) At December 31, 2008, this security has been pledged, in whole or in part, to cover initial margin requirements for open futures contracts.(c) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(d) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.ADR: American Depositary Receipt
REIT: Real Estate Investment Trust
At December 31, 2008, open futures contracts purchased were as follows:
Futures | Expiration Date | Contracts | Aggregated Face Value ($) | Value ($) | Unrealized Appreciation ($) |
S&P 500 Index
| 3/20/2009 | 57 | 2,523,416 | 2,565,285 | 41,869 |
Fair Value Measurements
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the Portfolio's investments. For information on the Portfolio's policy regarding the valuation of investments and of the valuation inputs, and the aggregate levels used in the table below, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | Investments in Securities | Other Financial Instruments++ |
Level 1
| $ 95,344,997 | $ 41,869 |
Level 2
| 2,678,003 | — |
Level 3
| — | — |
Total | $ 98,023,000 | $ 41,869 |
++ Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not reflected in the Investment Portfolio, such as futures contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2008
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $124,169,742), including $1,842,633 of securities loaned | $ 94,194,052 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $1,836,942)* | 1,836,942 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $1,992,006) | 1,992,006 |
Total investments, at value (cost $127,998,690)
| 98,023,000 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $1,794)
| 1,487 |
Dividends receivable
| 146,070 |
Interest receivable
| 7,510 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 98,945 |
Receivable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts
| 34,653 |
Other assets
| 3,793 |
Total assets
| 98,315,458 |
Liabilities |
Cash overdraft
| 2,349 |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 20,565 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 1,836,942 |
Accrued management fee
| 36,895 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 380 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 63,232 |
Total liabilities
| 1,960,363 |
Net assets, at value | $ 96,355,095 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 1,938,429 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | (29,975,690) |
Futures | 41,869 |
Foreign currency | (307) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| (41,101,142) |
Paid-in capital
| 165,451,936 |
Net assets, at value | $ 96,355,095 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($94,487,711 ÷ 18,437,278 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 5.12 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($1,867,384 ÷ 364,787 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 5.12 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $6,028)
| $ 2,702,211 |
Interest
| 11,151 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 109,069 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 39,191 |
Total Income
| 2,861,622 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 592,051 |
Administration fee
| 151,808 |
Custodian fee
| 25,213 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 15,010 |
Services to shareholders
| 969 |
Professional fees
| 73,438 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 7,575 |
Reports to shareholders
| 41,438 |
Other
| 11,113 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 918,615 |
Expense reductions
| (84,926) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 833,689 |
Net investment income (loss) | 2,027,933 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| (27,301,950) |
Futures
| (1,897,725) |
Foreign currency
| (89) |
| (29,199,764) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (40,861,638) |
Futures
| 61,425 |
Foreign currency
| (319) |
| (40,800,532) |
Net gain (loss) | (70,000,296) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ (67,972,363) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
| Years Ended December 31, |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2008 | 2007 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 2,027,933 | $ 3,281,163 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| (29,199,764) | 38,689,859 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (40,800,532) | (35,739,490) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| (67,972,363) | 6,231,532 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (3,050,163) | (3,254,218) |
Class B | (190,157) | (431,057) |
Net realized gains:
Class A | (35,948,939) | (3,589,531) |
Class B | (2,803,004) | (675,883) |
Total distributions
| (41,992,263) | (7,950,689) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 5,212,323 | 7,943,494 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 38,999,102 | 6,843,749 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (40,183,360) | (96,721,167) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| 4,028,065 | (81,933,924) |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 295,876 | 1,756,094 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 2,993,161 | 1,106,940 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (11,145,692) | (40,893,714) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (7,856,655) | (38,030,680) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (113,793,216) | (121,683,761) |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 210,148,311 | 331,832,072 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $1,938,429 and $3,269,183, respectively)
| $ 96,355,095 | $ 210,148,311 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 18,082,818 | 25,561,711 |
Shares sold
| 749,218 | 724,126 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 5,038,643 | 621,594 |
Shares redeemed
| (5,433,401) | (8,824,613) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| 354,460 | (7,478,893) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 18,437,278 | 18,082,818 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 1,355,326 | 4,788,468 |
Shares sold
| 42,150 | 161,143 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 387,214 | 100,722 |
Shares redeemed
| (1,419,903) | (3,695,007) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (990,539) | (3,433,142) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 364,787 | 1,355,326 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 10.81 | $ 10.94 | $ 9.72 | $ 9.29 | $ 8.50 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .10 | .13 | .13c | .10 | .12 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (3.45) | .02 | 1.19 | .45 | .74 |
Total from investment operations | (3.35) | .15 | 1.32 | .55 | .86 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.18) | (.13) | (.10) | (.12) | (.07) |
Net realized gains | (2.16) | (.15) | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (2.34) | (.28) | (.10) | (.12) | (.07) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 5.12 | $ 10.81 | $ 10.94 | $ 9.72 | $ 9.29 |
Total Return (%)
| (38.31)b | 1.36b | 13.63b,c | 6.07b | 10.16 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 94 | 196 | 280 | 294 | 172 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .60 | .57 | .56 | .57 | .56 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .54 | .56 | .54 | .54 | .56 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 1.34 | 1.18 | 1.24c | 1.10 | 1.37 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 130 | 310 | 105 | 115 | 33 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.007 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.07%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.06% lower.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 10.77 | $ 10.90 | $ 9.68 | $ 9.25 | $ 8.47 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .08 | .09 | .09c | .07 | .09 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (3.42) | .02 | 1.19 | .45 | .73 |
Total from investment operations | (3.34) | .11 | 1.28 | .52 | .82 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.15) | (.09) | (.06) | (.09) | (.04) |
Net realized gains | (2.16) | (.15) | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (2.31) | (.24) | (.06) | (.09) | (.04) |
Net asset value, end of period | 5.12 | $ 10.77 | $ 10.90 | $ 9.68 | $ 9.25 |
Total Return (%)
| (38.29)b | 1.00b | 13.28b,c | 5.73b | 9.78 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 2 | 15 | 52 | 47 | 33 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .82 | .95 | .94 | .95 | .89 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .77 | .92 | .89 | .89 | .89 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 1.12 | .82 | .89c | .75 | 1.04 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 130 | 310 | 105 | 115 | 33 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.007 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.07%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.06% lower.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Capital Growth VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2008 are 0.50% and 0.88% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2008.
Portfolio returns during all periods shown reflect a fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
The Portfolio is subject to stock market risk, meaning stocks in the Portfolio may decline in value for extended periods of time due to the activities and financial prospects of individual companies, or due to general market and economic conditions. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific information regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Capital Growth VIP — Class A [] Russell 1000® Growth Index [] S&P 500® Index | The Russell 1000® Growth Index is an unmanaged, capitalization- weighted index containing those securities in the Russell 1000 Index with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Standard & Poor's 500® (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f0d/a0f0dacfb529f240792aeb02ba1425aef5890d69" alt="dvs1_g10k640" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Capital Growth VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $6,702 | $8,189 | $9,635 | $8,507 |
Average annual total return
| -32.98% | -6.44% | -.74% | -1.60% |
Russell 1000 Growth Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $6,156 | $7,508 | $8,401 | $6,462 |
Average annual total return
| -38.44% | -9.11% | -3.42% | -4.27% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $6,300 | $7,696 | $8,953 | $8,700 |
Average annual total return
| -37.00% | -8.36% | -2.19% | -1.38% |
DWS Capital Growth VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $6,680 | $8,105 | $9,460 | $8,234 |
Average annual total return
| -33.20% | -6.76% | -1.11% | -1.92% |
Russell 1000 Growth Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $6,156 | $7,508 | $8,401 | $6,462 |
Average annual total return
| -38.44% | -9.11% | -3.42% | -4.27% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $6,300 | $7,696 | $8,953 | $8,700 |
Average annual total return
| -37.00% | -8.36% | -2.19% | -1.38% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Capital Growth VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, the Portfolio limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
• Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
• Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2008 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 712.40 | | $ 711.10 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.11 | | $ 3.53 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 1,022.67 | | $ 1,021.01 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.49 | | $ 4.17 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 366.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Capital Growth VIP
| .49% | | .82% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Capital Growth VIP
The year just ended was the worst in many decades for the US equity markets. Essentially all equity indices posted negative returns for this period, as markets reflected economic problems including a housing slump, rising unemployment, a crisis of confidence and an extreme credit crunch. The Russell 3000® Index, which is generally regarded as a good indicator of the broad stock market, had a negative return of -37.31% for the 12 months ended December 31, 2008. Value stocks, as measured by the Russell 1000® Value Index, performed somewhat better than growth stocks, as measured by the Russell 1000® Growth Index over the same period. With a return of -32.98% during the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008 (Class A shares, unadjusted for contract charges), the Portfolio performed better than its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index, which had a negative return of -38.44%.
The greatest contributor to performance was an overweight and stock selection in the health care sector.1 Holdings that performed especially well were biopharmaceutical companies Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Genentech, Inc., which soared on news that Roche Holding Ltd. had offered to acquire the 44% of Genentech it does not already own. Also, Johnson & Johnson performed much better than the market, although the stock was down modestly.
The major detractor from performance was stock selection in the consumer discretionary sector. Positions in this sector that hurt performance were GameStop Corp., Harley-Davidson, Inc.* and Dick's Sporting Goods.* However, an overweight position in McDonald's Corp., also in the consumer discretionary sector, was one of the top contributors to performance.
Owen Fitzpatrick, CFA (as of February 15, 2009) and Richard Shepley
Co-Lead Portfolio Managers
Brendan O'Neill, CFA
Portfolio Manager
The Russell 3000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 3,000 largest US companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable US equity market.
The Russell 1000 Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000 Growth Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index containing those securities in the Russell 1000 Index with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
1 "Overweight" means the portfolio holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. "Underweight" means the portfolio holds a lower weighting.* Not held in the Portfolio as of December 31, 2008.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2008, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Capital Growth VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 97% | 98% |
Cash Equivalents | 3% | 2% |
| 100% | 100% |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Common Stocks) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Health Care | 22% | 18% |
Information Technology | 22% | 24% |
Consumer Staples | 15% | 11% |
Energy | 10% | 14% |
Industrials | 10% | 11% |
Consumer Discretionary | 8% | 10% |
Materials | 8% | 4% |
Financials | 3% | 5% |
Telecommunication Services | 1% | 2% |
Utilities | 1% | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation and sector diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 43. A complete list of portfolio holdings of the Portfolio is posted as of the month end on www.dws-investments.com on or about the 15th day of the following month. More frequent posting of portfolio holdings information may be made from time to time on www.dws-investments.com.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2008
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 97.3% |
Consumer Discretionary 7.9% |
Hotels Restaurants & Leisure 2.7% |
McDonald's Corp. (a) | 265,700 | 16,523,883 |
Media 0.5% |
Walt Disney Co. (a) | 133,200 | 3,022,308 |
Multiline Retail 1.4% |
Kohl's Corp.* (a) | 238,200 | 8,622,840 |
Specialty Retail 2.5% |
GameStop Corp. "A"* | 210,100 | 4,550,766 |
Staples, Inc. | 413,565 | 7,411,085 |
Tiffany & Co. | 136,700 | 3,230,221 |
| 15,192,072 |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods 0.8% |
NIKE, Inc. "B" | 88,400 | 4,508,400 |
Consumer Staples 14.2% |
Beverages 4.3% |
Diageo PLC | 506,526 | 6,998,559 |
PepsiCo, Inc. | 349,325 | 19,132,530 |
| 26,131,089 |
Food & Staples Retailing 4.3% |
Shoppers Drug Mart Corp. | 105,100 | 4,090,770 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (a) | 294,400 | 16,504,064 |
Walgreen Co. | 216,800 | 5,348,456 |
| 25,943,290 |
Food Products 3.3% |
Dean Foods Co.* | 181,618 | 3,263,676 |
General Mills, Inc. | 49,400 | 3,001,050 |
Groupe DANONE | 110,035 | 6,604,556 |
Kellogg Co. | 162,200 | 7,112,470 |
| 19,981,752 |
Household Products 2.3% |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 139,240 | 9,543,510 |
Procter & Gamble Co. | 72,770 | 4,498,641 |
| 14,042,151 |
Energy 10.2% |
Energy Equipment & Services 2.6% |
Halliburton Co. | 242,200 | 4,403,196 |
Noble Corp. | 152,700 | 3,373,143 |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 126,400 | 5,350,512 |
Transocean Ltd.* (a) | 56,927 | 2,689,801 |
| 15,816,652 |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 7.6% |
ConocoPhillips | 104,660 | 5,421,388 |
Devon Energy Corp. | 165,700 | 10,888,147 |
EOG Resources, Inc. (a) | 119,725 | 7,971,290 |
ExxonMobil Corp. | 143,000 | 11,415,690 |
XTO Energy, Inc. (a) | 281,982 | 9,945,505 |
| 45,642,020 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Financials 3.3% |
Capital Markets 1.2% |
Charles Schwab Corp. | 239,000 | 3,864,630 |
State Street Corp. (a) | 84,470 | 3,322,205 |
| 7,186,835 |
Diversified Financial Services 0.7% |
CME Group, Inc. (a) | 19,937 | 4,149,089 |
Insurance 1.4% |
Aflac, Inc. | 187,724 | 8,605,268 |
Health Care 21.9% |
Biotechnology 6.5% |
Celgene Corp.* | 146,900 | 8,120,632 |
Genentech, Inc.* (a) | 110,350 | 9,149,118 |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.* (a) | 429,620 | 21,970,767 |
| 39,240,517 |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies 6.2% |
Baxter International, Inc. | 287,800 | 15,423,202 |
C.R. Bard, Inc. | 96,500 | 8,131,090 |
Hologic, Inc.* (a) | 181,500 | 2,372,205 |
Medtronic, Inc. | 194,300 | 6,104,906 |
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.* | 135,840 | 5,490,653 |
| 37,522,056 |
Health Care Providers & Services 1.3% |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* (a) | 105,300 | 6,782,373 |
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 34,685 | 922,621 |
| 7,704,994 |
Life Sciences Tools & Services 1.1% |
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.* (a) | 193,400 | 6,589,138 |
Pharmaceuticals 6.8% |
Abbott Laboratories | 292,200 | 15,594,714 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 92,400 | 3,720,948 |
Johnson & Johnson (a) | 365,466 | 21,865,831 |
| 41,181,493 |
Industrials 9.8% |
Aerospace & Defense 4.4% |
Goodrich Corp. (a) | 208,300 | 7,711,266 |
Honeywell International, Inc. (a) | 244,700 | 8,033,501 |
United Technologies Corp. | 200,200 | 10,730,720 |
| 26,475,487 |
Electrical Equipment 1.8% |
Emerson Electric Co. (a) | 301,900 | 11,052,559 |
Machinery 1.3% |
Caterpillar, Inc. | 32,200 | 1,438,374 |
Parker Hannifin Corp. (a) | 149,200 | 6,346,968 |
| 7,785,342 |
Road & Rail 2.3% |
Canadian National Railway Co. (a) | 254,900 | 9,370,124 |
Norfolk Southern Corp. | 102,800 | 4,836,740 |
| 14,206,864 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Information Technology 21.1% |
Communications Equipment 3.2% |
Cisco Systems, Inc.* | 558,720 | 9,107,136 |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 275,700 | 9,878,331 |
| 18,985,467 |
Computers & Peripherals 6.7% |
Apple, Inc.* | 142,835 | 12,190,967 |
EMC Corp.* | 378,615 | 3,964,099 |
Hewlett-Packard Co. (a) | 365,000 | 13,245,850 |
International Business Machines Corp. (a) | 134,700 | 11,336,352 |
| 40,737,268 |
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components 1.1% |
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.* (a) | 97,300 | 6,558,020 |
Internet Software & Services 0.9% |
Google, Inc. "A"* | 17,825 | 5,483,861 |
IT Services 3.7% |
Accenture Ltd. "A" | 324,300 | 10,633,797 |
Fiserv, Inc.* (a) | 137,400 | 4,997,238 |
Visa, Inc. "A" | 129,000 | 6,766,050 |
| 22,397,085 |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment 2.3% |
Broadcom Corp. "A"* (a) | 156,200 | 2,650,714 |
Intel Corp. (a) | 763,090 | 11,186,900 |
| 13,837,614 |
Software 3.2% |
Adobe Systems, Inc.* (a) | 268,475 | 5,715,833 |
Electronic Arts, Inc.* | 147,700 | 2,369,108 |
Microsoft Corp. (a) | 585,380 | 11,379,787 |
| 19,464,728 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Materials 7.4% |
Chemicals 5.1% |
Ecolab, Inc. | 294,100 | 10,337,615 |
Monsanto Co. | 154,700 | 10,883,145 |
Praxair, Inc. (a) | 161,300 | 9,574,768 |
| 30,795,528 |
Metals & Mining 2.3% |
Barrick Gold Corp. (a) | 316,500 | 11,637,705 |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 85,800 | 2,096,952 |
| 13,734,657 |
Telecommunication Services 1.0% |
Diversified Telecommunication Services |
AT&T, Inc. | 219,000 | 6,241,500 |
Utilities 0.5% |
Electric Utilities |
Allegheny Energy, Inc. | 80,100 | 2,712,186 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $574,082,567) | 588,074,013 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 22.8% |
Daiy Assets Fund Institutional, 1.69% (b) (c) (Cost $137,751,495) | 137,751,495 | 137,751,495 |
|
Cash Equivalents 2.7% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 1.42% (b) (Cost $16,636,327) | 16,636,327 | 16,636,327 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $728,470,389)+ | 122.8 | 742,461,835 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (22.8) | (138,040,166) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 604,421,669 |
* Non-income producing security.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $731,887,395. At December 31, 2008, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $10,574,440. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $110,906,577 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $100,332,137.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2008 amounted to $135,983,737, which is 22.5% of net assets.(b) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(c) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.Fair Value Measurements
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the Portfolio's investments. For information on the Portfolio's policy regarding the valuation of investments and of the valuation inputs, and the aggregate levels used in the table below, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | Investments in Securities |
Level 1
| $ 712,222,393 |
Level 2
| 30,239,442 |
Level 3
| — |
Total | $ 742,461,835 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2008
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $574,082,567), including $135,983,737 of securities loaned | $ 588,074,013 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $137,751,495)* | 137,751,495 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $16,636,327) | 16,636,327 |
Total investments, at value (cost $728,470,389)
| 742,461,835 |
Receivable for investments sold
| 82,215 |
Dividends receivable
| 714,396 |
Interest receivable
| 104,795 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 16,799 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 64,757 |
Other assets
| 28,207 |
Total assets
| 743,473,004 |
Liabilities |
Cash overdraft
| 78,290 |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 909,371 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 137,751,495 |
Accrued management fee
| 142,926 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 1,481 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 167,772 |
Total liabilities
| 139,051,335 |
Net assets, at value | $ 604,421,669 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 7,945,917 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | 13,991,446 |
Foreign currency | 5,875 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| (239,522,654) |
Paid-in capital
| 822,001,085 |
Net assets, at value | $ 604,421,669 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($593,927,716 ÷ 43,844,542 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 13.55 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($10,493,953 ÷ 777,803 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 13.49 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $92,798)
| $ 11,275,199 |
Interest
| 626 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 424,008 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 486,686 |
Total Income
| 12,186,519 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 3,273,016 |
Administration fee
| 879,862 |
Custodian fee
| 66,128 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 37,000 |
Services to shareholders
| 874 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 14,172 |
Professional fees
| 95,226 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 45,567 |
Reports to shareholders
| 49,388 |
Other
| 30,997 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 4,492,230 |
Expense reductions
| (119,918) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 4,372,312 |
Net investment income (loss) | 7,814,207 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| 23,279,165 |
Foreign currency
| (106,168) |
| 23,172,997 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (355,391,930) |
Foreign currency
| 2,427 |
| (355,389,503) |
Net gain (loss) | (332,216,506) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ (324,402,299) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
| Years Ended December 31, |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2008 | 2007 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 7,814,207 | $ 9,712,813 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| 23,172,997 | 108,270,953 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (355,389,503) | 19,841,624 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| (324,402,299) | 137,825,390 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (9,355,147) | (6,887,657) |
Class B | (96,190) | (258,683) |
Total distributions
| (9,451,337) | (7,146,340) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 23,952,264 | 22,292,590 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 9,355,147 | 6,887,657 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (169,314,485) | (225,450,131) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (136,007,074) | (196,269,884) |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 1,473,846 | 1,548,433 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 96,190 | 258,683 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (4,263,172) | (97,598,529) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (2,693,136) | (95,791,413) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (472,553,846) | (161,382,247) |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 1,076,975,515 | 1,238,357,762 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $7,945,917 and $9,689,216, respectively)
| $ 604,421,669 | $ 1,076,975,515 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 51,857,448 | 62,005,444 |
Shares sold
| 1,366,508 | 1,165,102 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 468,930 | 362,508 |
Shares redeemed
| (9,848,344) | (11,675,606) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (8,012,906) | (10,147,996) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 43,844,542 | 51,857,448 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 920,834 | 5,921,673 |
Shares sold
| 89,671 | 80,681 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 4,831 | 13,644 |
Shares redeemed
| (237,533) | (5,095,164) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (143,031) | (5,000,839) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 777,803 | 920,834 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 20.41 | $18.24 | $ 16.90 | $ 15.67 | $ 14.59 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .16 | .17d | .13c | .10 | .14 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (6.83) | 2.12 | 1.31 | 1.29 | 1.02 |
Total from investment operations | (6.67) | 2.29 | 1.44 | 1.39 | 1.16 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.19) | (.12) | (.10) | (.16) | (.08) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 13.55 | $ 20.41 | $ 18.24 | $ 16.90 | $ 15.67 |
Total Return (%)
| (32.98)b | 12.59b | 8.53b,c | 8.96b | 7.99 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 594 | 1,058 | 1,131 | 1,031 | 698 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .50 | .53 | .52 | .50 | .50 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .49 | .52 | .49 | .49 | .50 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .89 | .86d | .73c | .61 | .98 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 21 | 30 | 16 | 17 | 15 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.007 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.04%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.03% lower. d Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.03 per share and 0.17% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 20.31 | $ 18.15 | $ 16.81 | $ 15.59 | $ 14.52 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .10 | .09d | .06c | .04 | .09 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (6.81) | 2.12 | 1.31 | 1.28 | 1.01 |
Total from investment operations | (6.71) | 2.21 | 1.37 | 1.32 | 1.10 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.11) | (.05) | (.03) | (.10) | (.03) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 13.49 | $ 20.31 | $ 18.15 | $ 16.81 | $ 15.59 |
Total Return (%)
| (33.20)b | 12.18b | 8.17b,c | 8.51b | 7.56 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 10 | 19 | 107 | 73 | 23 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .85 | .94 | .91 | .89 | .88 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .82 | .90 | .86 | .86 | .88 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .56 | .48d | .36c | .24 | .60 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 21 | 30 | 16 | 17 | 15 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.007 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.04%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.03% lower. d Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.03 per share and 0.17% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2008 are 1.10% and 1.46% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2008.
Portfolio returns during all periods shown reflect a fee waiver and/or reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. Investing in foreign securities presents certain risks, such as currency fluctuations, political and economic changes and market risks. Additionally, stocks of small-sized companies involve greater risk as they often have limited product lines, markets, or financial resources and may be sensitive to erratic and abrupt market movements more so than securities of larger, more-established companies. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Global Opportunities VIP — Class A [] S&P® Developed SmallCap Index | The S&P® Developed SmallCap Index (formerly the S&P/Citigroup Extended Market Index-World), is an unmanaged index of small-capitalization stocks within 26 countries around the globe. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends net of withholding tax and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbb64/bbb640f3e04b2d46c0623d1687d86a8d10c6982b" alt="dvs1_g10k630" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $5,004 | $6,678 | $9,735 | $13,776 |
Average annual total return
| -49.96% | -12.59% | -.54% | 3.26% |
S&P Developed SmallCap Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $5,625 | $7,301 | $10,410 | $14,967 |
Average annual total return
| -43.75% | -9.96% | .81% | 4.12% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $4,984 | $6,616 | $9,617 | $13,444 |
Average annual total return
| -50.16% | -12.86% | -.78% | 3.00% |
S&P Developed SmallCap Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $5,625 | $7,301 | $10,410 | $14,967 |
Average annual total return
| -43.75% | -9.96% | .81% | 4.12% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, the Portfolio limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
• Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
• Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2008 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 563.30 | | $ 561.70 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 3.85 | | $ 5.10 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 1,020.21 | | $ 1,018.60 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 4.98 | | $ 6.60 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 366.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| .98% | | 1.30% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
Amid the extremely negative investment environment of the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008, DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class A shares (unadjusted for contract charges) declined -49.96% and lagged the - -43.75% return of the S&P® Developed SmallCap Index (formerly the S&P/Citigroup Extended Market Index-World).
We are disappointed to report that stock selection was the primary cause of the Portfolio's underperformance. Our emphasis on using fundamental research to find high-quality growth companies was not rewarded during the past year, reflecting the fact that investor fear caused higher-quality companies to decline in tandem with other, less attractive companies. In these unusual market conditions, our focus on fundamentals did not translate into outperformance.
Stock selections in the financial, information technology and consumer staples sectors were notable sources of underperformance in 2008. On the plus side, we generated the best relative performance in the health care and consumer discretionary sectors. The top individual contributors were Thoratec Corp. and Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co., while the leading detractors were SunOpta, Inc., Piraeus Bank S.A.* and Anglo Irish Bank Corp. PLC.
While the past year has been a difficult time to be invested in small-cap stocks, the extreme market volatility has provided an opportunity to establish long-term positions in fast-growing companies at very attractive valuation levels. Overall, we believe the portfolio is defensively positioned due to our preference for the highest-quality fundamentally sound growth companies. We believe this is the most effective way to approach a market characterized by both high risks and increasingly compelling opportunities.
Joseph Axtell, CFA Jeffrey Saeger, CFA
Portfolio Managers
The S&P Developed SmallCap Index (formerly the S&P/Citigroup Extended Market Index-World), is an unmanaged index of small-capitalization stocks within 26 countries around the globe.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends net of withholding tax and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
* Not held in the Portfolio as of December 31, 2008.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2008, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 99% | 98% |
Cash Equivalents | 1% | 2% |
| 100% | 100% |
Geographical Diversification (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Cash Equivalents and Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
United States | 41% | 31% |
Continental Europe | 35% | 38% |
United Kingdom | 8% | 9% |
Japan | 7% | 6% |
Pacific Basin | 5% | 10% |
Canada | 1% | 2% |
Australia | 1% | 2% |
Latin America | 1% | 1% |
Other | 1% | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Common Stocks) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Health Care | 21% | 16% |
Industrials | 20% | 16% |
Information Technology | 18% | 18% |
Financials | 12% | 21% |
Consumer Discretionary | 10% | 10% |
Energy | 9% | 10% |
Consumer Staples | 5% | 3% |
Utilities | 4% | 4% |
Materials | 1% | 1% |
Telecommunication Services | — | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation, geographical diversification and sector diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 57. A complete list of portfolio holdings of the Portfolio is posted as of the month end on www.dws-investments.com on or about the 15th day of the following month. More frequent posting of portfolio holdings information may be made from time to time on www.dws-investments.com.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2008
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 98.0% |
Australia 0.6% |
Austal Ltd. (Cost $1,028,811) | 538,533 | 735,763 |
Bahrain 0.4% |
Gulf Finance House EC (GDR) 144A (Cost $1,138,485) | 50,082 | 425,697 |
Belgium 0.4% |
Hansen Transmissions International NV* (Cost $1,014,963) | 286,190 | 482,621 |
Brazil 0.5% |
Diagnosticos da America SA (Cost $1,502,673) | 66,100 | 643,535 |
Canada 1.4% |
CAE, Inc. | 153,300 | 1,005,857 |
OPTI Canada, Inc.* | 155,100 | 226,295 |
SunOpta, Inc.* | 336,500 | 528,305 |
(Cost $5,479,171) | 1,760,457 |
China 1.2% |
Minth Group Ltd. | 1,782,200 | 718,935 |
Soho China Ltd. | 732,500 | 317,160 |
VanceInfo Technologies, Inc. (ADR)* | 97,800 | 464,550 |
(Cost $1,838,606) | 1,500,645 |
Cyprus 0.8% |
Prosafe Production Public Ltd.*(a) | 247,423 | 396,307 |
ProSafe SE (b) | 152,963 | 583,175 |
(Cost $2,275,949) | 979,482 |
France 2.4% |
Financiere Marc de Lacharriere SA (a) | 21,810 | 680,290 |
Flamel Technologies SA (ADR)* (a) | 200,700 | 786,744 |
JC Decaux SA | 82,396 | 1,418,659 |
(Cost $6,219,557) | 2,885,693 |
Germany 15.4% |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA | 129,507 | 6,072,988 |
Grenkeleasing AG | 22,417 | 562,511 |
M.A.X. Automation AG | 284,739 | 896,684 |
QSC AG* | 219,612 | 388,028 |
Rational AG (a) | 10,184 | 1,208,254 |
SGL Carbon AG* (a) | 42,100 | 1,438,445 |
Software AG | 29,904 | 1,688,234 |
Stada Arzneimittel AG | 81,334 | 2,378,854 |
Tognum AG | 45,157 | 576,811 |
United Internet AG (Registered) (a) | 237,543 | 2,126,030 |
Wincor Nixdorf AG | 31,634 | 1,508,246 |
(Cost $15,472,529) | 18,845,085 |
Greece 1.7% |
Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Co. SA | 101,300 | 1,477,724 |
Hellenic Exchanges SA | 81,800 | 644,018 |
(Cost $2,173,850) | 2,121,742 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Hong Kong 3.4% |
K Wah International Holdings Ltd. | 2,598,000 | 424,581 |
Kingboard Chemical Holdings Ltd. | 799,640 | 1,446,996 |
Midland Holdings Ltd. | 1,550,357 | 557,281 |
Wing Hang Bank Ltd. | 196,700 | 1,139,534 |
Xinyi Glass Holdings Co., Ltd. (c) | 2,160,000 | 584,028 |
(Cost $4,353,189) | 4,152,420 |
Ireland 4.9% |
Anglo Irish Bank Corp. PLC | 236,421 | 56,779 |
C&C Group PLC | 465,849 | 943,174 |
FBD Holdings PLC | 26,000 | 265,415 |
ICON PLC (ADR)* | 76,400 | 1,504,316 |
Kingspan Group PLC | 91,146 | 397,368 |
Norkom Group PLC* | 297,432 | 206,723 |
Paddy Power PLC | 67,729 | 1,267,822 |
Ryanair Holdings PLC* | 319,528 | 1,326,859 |
(Cost $8,277,547) | 5,968,456 |
Italy 1.3% |
Prysmian SpA (Cost $2,222,420) | 100,453 | 1,577,725 |
Japan 7.0% |
AEON Credit Service Co., Ltd. | 77,200 | 816,783 |
AEON Mall Co., Ltd. | 121,000 | 2,336,004 |
JAFCO Co., Ltd. | 19,100 | 488,272 |
Mitsubishi UFJ Lease & Finance Co., Ltd. | 34,660 | 880,587 |
Nidec Corp. | 19,000 | 738,866 |
Shinko Plantech Co., Ltd. | 181,300 | 1,534,634 |
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd. | 86,000 | 1,281,320 |
Wacom Co., Ltd. (a) | 541 | 478,598 |
(Cost $9,046,289) | 8,555,064 |
Netherlands 5.7% |
Arcadis NV (a) | 60,716 | 800,443 |
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV (NY Registered Shares) | 60,700 | 610,035 |
Koninklijke Vopak NV | 27,573 | 1,046,212 |
QIAGEN NV* (a) | 156,000 | 2,726,175 |
SBM Offshore NV | 133,045 | 1,743,441 |
(Cost $7,507,816) | 6,926,306 |
Spain 0.5% |
Tecnicas Reunidas SA (Cost $1,500,429) | 24,688 | 645,132 |
Sweden 0.0% |
Micronic Laser Systems AB* (a) (Cost $607,066) | 63,300 | 48,029 |
Switzerland 1.2% |
Advanced Digital Broadcast Holdings SA (ADB Group) (Registered)* | 15,290 | 418,211 |
Partners Group Holding AG | 15,400 | 1,094,891 |
(Cost $1,592,201) | 1,513,102 |
Taiwan 0.7% |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co. (Cost $636,347) | 1,010,743 | 883,338 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
United Arab Emirates 0.5% |
Lamprell PLC (Cost $1,204,470) | 368,174 | 624,665 |
United Kingdom 8.1% |
Aegis Group PLC | 406,459 | 438,205 |
ARM Holdings PLC | 805,246 | 1,007,643 |
Ashmore Group PLC | 491,229 | 946,681 |
Babcock International Group PLC | 166,156 | 1,142,990 |
Carphone Warehouse Group PLC | 307,703 | 399,505 |
John Wood Group PLC | 170,975 | 466,384 |
Kofax PLC | 289,575 | 580,053 |
Michael Page International PLC | 288,739 | 898,656 |
Serco Group PLC | 410,345 | 2,670,727 |
Xchanging PLC (a) | 405,910 | 1,379,823 |
(Cost $15,272,784) | 9,930,667 |
United States 39.9% |
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. | 38,850 | 1,307,302 |
Aecom Technology Corp.* | 77,368 | 2,377,519 |
Aeropostale, Inc.* | 36,900 | 594,090 |
Allegheny Energy, Inc. | 149,500 | 5,062,070 |
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 74,200 | 694,512 |
AMERIGROUP Corp.* | 69,100 | 2,039,832 |
ANSYS, Inc.* | 11,700 | 326,313 |
BE Aerospace, Inc.* | 64,100 | 492,929 |
Cameron International Corp.* | 13,700 | 280,850 |
Carter's, Inc.* | 65,200 | 1,255,752 |
Chattem, Inc.* | 13,100 | 937,043 |
Cogent, Inc.* | 89,400 | 1,213,158 |
Deckers Outdoor Corp.* | 10,000 | 798,700 |
Diamond Foods, Inc. | 58,300 | 1,174,745 |
Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.* | 79,100 | 1,364,475 |
EMS Technologies, Inc.* | 46,600 | 1,205,542 |
Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. | 44,100 | 618,282 |
FTI Consulting, Inc.* (a) | 52,950 | 2,365,806 |
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc.* (a) | 32,400 | 1,253,880 |
Itron, Inc.* (a) | 52,100 | 3,320,854 |
Jefferies Group, Inc. | 46,500 | 653,790 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Joy Global, Inc. | 66,475 | 1,521,613 |
Lam Research Corp.* | 25,300 | 538,384 |
Life Technologies Corp.* | 45,400 | 1,058,274 |
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (a) | 6,800 | 660,144 |
Metabolix, Inc.* (a) | 42,500 | 540,600 |
Mueller Water Products, Inc. "A" | 62,100 | 521,640 |
Mylan, Inc.* (a) | 134,900 | 1,334,161 |
NeuStar, Inc. "A"* | 58,900 | 1,126,757 |
NxStage Medical, Inc.* | 175,600 | 468,852 |
Owens & Minor, Inc. | 48,300 | 1,818,495 |
Perficient, Inc.* | 49,500 | 236,610 |
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. | 28,800 | 579,744 |
Schawk, Inc. | 78,400 | 898,464 |
Somanetics Corp.* | 75,900 | 1,253,109 |
Thoratec Corp.* | 93,200 | 3,028,068 |
THQ, Inc.* | 121,200 | 507,828 |
Ultra Petroleum Corp.* | 77,800 | 2,684,878 |
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. "A" | 48,500 | 749,810 |
(Cost $47,468,907) | 48,864,875 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $137,834,059) | 120,070,499 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 13.9% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 1.69% (d) (e) (Cost $17,084,496) | 17,084,496 | 17,084,496 |
|
Cash Equivalents 1.3% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 1.42% (d) (Cost $1,583,652) | 1,583,652 | 1,583,652 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $156,502,207)+ | 113.2 | 138,738,647 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (13.2) | (16,194,822) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 122,543,825 |
* Non-income producing security.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $158,829,287. At December 31, 2008, net unrealized depreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $20,090,640. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $24,728,164 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $44,818,804.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2008 amounted to $16,526,028, which is 13.5% of net assets.(b) Security is listed in country of domicile. Significant business activities of the company are in Norway.(c) Security is listed in country of domicile. Significant business activities of the company are in China.(d) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(e) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.144A: Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.ADR: American Depositary ReceiptGDR: Global Depositary ReceiptFair Value Measurements
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the Portfolio's investments. For information on the Portfolio's policy regarding the valuation of investments and of the valuation inputs, and the aggregate levels used in the table below, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | Investments in Securities |
Level 1
| $ 71,719,009 |
Level 2
| 67,019,638 |
Level 3
| — |
Total | $ 138,738,647 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2008
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $137,834,059), including $16,526,028 of securities loaned | $ 120,070,499 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $17,084,496)* | 17,084,496 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $1,583,652) | 1,583,652 |
Total investments, at value (cost $156,502,207)
| 138,738,647 |
Cash
| 418 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $27,783)
| 28,197 |
Receivable for investments sold
| 847,640 |
Dividends receivable
| 39,412 |
Interest receivable
| 31,710 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 82,512 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 24,745 |
Other assets
| 38,829 |
Total assets
| 139,832,110 |
Liabilities |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 15,150 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 17,084,496 |
Accrued management fee
| 60,395 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 1,040 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 127,204 |
Total liabilities
| 17,288,285 |
Net assets, at value | $ 122,543,825 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 298,854 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | (17,763,560) |
Foreign currency | (915) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| (14,322,470) |
Paid-in capital
| 154,331,916 |
Net assets, at value | $ 122,543,825 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($117,421,297 ÷ 15,069,861 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 7.79 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($5,122,528 ÷ 669,567 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 7.65 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $323,075)
| $ 5,015,732 |
Interest
| 4,084 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 117,270 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 623,481 |
Total Income
| 5,760,567 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 2,040,460 |
Administration fee
| 229,265 |
Custodian fee
| 152,041 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 22,275 |
Services to shareholders
| 1,037 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 5,578 |
Professional fees
| 79,387 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 11,624 |
Reports to shareholders
| 9,453 |
Other
| 19,828 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 2,570,948 |
Expense reductions
| (283,039) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 2,287,909 |
Net investment income (loss) | 3,472,658 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| (11,343,628) |
Foreign currency
| (70,789) |
| (11,414,417) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (135,414,718) |
Foreign currency
| (18,560) |
| (135,433,278) |
Net gain (loss) | (146,847,695) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ (143,375,037) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
| Years Ended December 31, |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2008 | 2007 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 3,472,658 | $ 1,523,675 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| (11,414,417) | 41,714,536 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (135,433,278) | (9,538,525) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| (143,375,037) | 33,699,686 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (606,759) | (4,162,201) |
Class B | — | (385,143) |
Net realized gains:
Class A | (38,799,742) | (23,747,876) |
Class B | (1,584,503) | (2,659,501) |
Total distributions
| (40,991,004) | (30,954,721) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 9,798,954 | 25,551,412 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 39,406,501 | 27,910,077 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (64,901,647) | (76,124,259) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (15,696,192) | (22,662,770) |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 887,328 | 2,661,166 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 1,584,503 | 3,044,644 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (2,362,537) | (30,666,540) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| 109,294 | (24,960,730) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (199,952,939) | (44,878,535) |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 322,496,764 | 367,375,299 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income and accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $298,854 and $4,870,687, respectively)
| $ 122,543,825 | $ 322,496,764 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 16,980,253 | 18,234,839 |
Shares sold
| 754,392 | 1,377,801 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 2,730,873 | 1,512,741 |
Shares redeemed
| (5,395,657) | (4,145,128) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (1,910,392) | (1,254,586) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 15,069,861 | 16,980,253 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 673,793 | 2,034,192 |
Shares sold
| 67,771 | 144,813 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 111,428 | 167,013 |
Shares redeemed
| (183,425) | (1,672,225) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (4,226) | (1,360,399) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 669,567 | 673,793 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 18.28 | $ 18.15 | $ 15.00 | $ 12.77 | $ 10.38 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .20e | .08d | .03c | .04 | .01 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (8.18) | 1.61 | 3.28 | 2.27 | 2.41 |
Total from investment operations | (7.98) | 1.69 | 3.31 | 2.31 | 2.42 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.04) | (.23) | (.16) | (.08) | (.03) |
Net realized gains | (2.47) | (1.33) | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (2.51) | (1.56) | (.16) | (.08) | (.03) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 7.79 | $ 18.28 | $ 18.15 | $ 15.00 | $ 12.77 |
Total Return (%)
| (49.96)b | 9.33b | 22.08c | 18.19 | 23.35 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 117 | 310 | 331 | 285 | 232 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| 1.11 | 1.14 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.18 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .99 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.18 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 1.53e | .45d | .16c | .32 | .09 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 21 | 19 | 28 | 30 | 24 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.002 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.01%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.01% lower. d Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.02 per share and 0.09% of average daily net assets, respectively. e Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.05 per share and 0.37% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 18.03 | $ 17.93 | $ 14.84 | $ 12.62 | $ 10.25 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .16f | .01e | (.00)b,d | .03 | (.01) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (8.07) | 1.61 | 3.24 | 2.24 | 2.38 |
Total from investment operations | (7.91) | 1.62 | 3.24 | 2.27 | 2.37 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | — | (.19) | (.15) | (.05) | — |
Net realized gains | (2.47) | (1.33) | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (2.47) | (1.52) | (.15) | (.05) | — |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 7.65 | $ 18.03 | $ 17.93 | $ 14.84 | $ 12.62 |
Total Return (%)
| (50.16)c | 8.92c | 21.88c,d | 18.06c | 23.12c |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 5 | 12 | 37 | 33 | 24 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| 1.42 | 1.53 | 1.51 | 1.54 | 1.52 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| 1.30 | 1.50 | 1.31 | 1.24 | 1.39 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 1.21f | .07e | (.03)d | .25 | (.12) |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 21 | 19 | 28 | 30 | 24 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Amount is less than $.005. c Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. d Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.002 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.01%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.01% lower. e Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.02 per share and 0.09% of average daily net assets, respectively. f Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.05 per share and 0.37% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2008
DWS International VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2008 are 0.94% and 1.19% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2008.
Portfolio returns during all periods shown reflect a fee waiver and/or reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. Investing in foreign securities presents certain risks, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes and market risks. This may result in greater share price volatility. Derivatives may be more volatile and less liquid than traditional securities, and the Portfolio could suffer losses on an underlying Portfolio's derivative position. Investing in securities of emerging markets presents certain risks, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes and market risks. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS International VIP — Class A [] MSCI EAFE® Index | The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Europe, Australasia and Far East (EAFE®) Index is an unmanaged index that tracks international stock performance in the 21 developed markets in Europe, Australasia and the Far East. The index is calculated using closing local market prices and translates into US dollars using the London close foreign exchange rates. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends net of withholding tax and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad424/ad4249f087744b03f15fd1065947059e411c22d6" alt="dvs1_g10k620" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS International VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $5,179 | $7,472 | $10,115 | $8,824 |
Average annual total return
| -48.21% | -9.26% | .23% | -1.24% |
MSCI EAFE® Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $5,662 | $7,953 | $10,857 | $10,828 |
Average annual total return
| -43.38% | -7.35% | 1.66% | .80% |
DWS International VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $5,175 | $7,417 | $9,976 | $8,623 |
Average annual total return
| -48.25% | -9.48% | -.05% | -1.47% |
MSCI EAFE® Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $5,662 | $7,953 | $10,857 | $10,828 |
Average annual total return
| -43.38% | -7.35% | 1.66% | .80% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS International VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, the Portfolio limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
• Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
• Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2008 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 556.30 | | $ 557.20 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 3.79 | | $ 4.78 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 1,020.26 | | $ 1,019.00 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 4.93 | | $ 6.19 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 366.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS International VIP
| .97% | | 1.22% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2008
DWS International VIP
The MSCI EAFE® Index (the Portfolio's benchmark) returned -43.38% during the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008, a year that was characterized by the rapid expansion of the global financial crisis, slowing economic growth and sharply elevated investor risk aversion. During the same period, Class A shares of the Portfolio returned -48.21% (unadjusted for contract charges), underperforming the index. The primary reason for underperformance was the Portfolio's level of risk exposure coming into the autumn downturn. Starting in mid-August, we sought to reduce risk by decreasing the Portfolio's weightings in higher-risk areas such as mid- and small-caps, emerging-market stocks and cyclicals. Unfortunately, we did not make these changes quickly enough to prevent underperformance.
For the full year, the Portfolio's return was helped by an underweight in financials and favorable stock selection in the information technology and health care sectors, but this was offset by weaker stock selection in the consumer staples and consumer discretionary sectors.1 The leading contributors to performance included iShares MSCI Japan Index Fund, BASF SE and China Mobile Ltd. The most significant detractors were the Russian gas company Gazprom and the brewer Carlsberg AS.
Believing that recovery in the global economy will likely occur slowly, we are maintaining a defensive positioning in the Portfolio. We believe sectors with high cash flows, stable earnings and a low sensitivity to economic trends, such as health care and telecommunications are well positioned in this market. At the same time, the Portfolio is underweight in areas that are more dependent on economic growth, such as industrials, financials and the consumer discretionary sector. Although defensive for now, we are also keeping a close eye on stock-specific opportunities given that dividend yields are attractive and price-to-book values are at their lowest level of the past 10-15 years.
Joseph Axtell, CFA
Portfolio Manager
The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Europe, Australasia and Far East (EAFE®) Index is an unmanaged index that tracks international stock performance in the 21 developed markets in Europe, Australasia and the Far East. The index is calculated using closing local market prices and translates into US dollars using the London close foreign exchange rates.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends net of withholding tax and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
1 "Overweight" means the portfolio holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. "Underweight" means the portfolio holds a lower weighting.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2008, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Portfolio Summary
DWS International VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 93% | 98% |
Exchange Traded Funds | 5% | — |
Cash Equivalents | 2% | — |
Preferred Stocks | — | 2% |
| 100% | 100% |
Geographical Diversification (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Cash Equivalents and Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Continental Europe | 62% | 53% |
Japan | 22% | 14% |
United Kingdom | 8% | 15% |
Pacific Basin | 5% | 7% |
Latin America | 2% | 3% |
Australia | — | 3% |
Middle East | — | 3% |
Other | 1% | 2% |
| 100% | 100% |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Common and Preferred Stocks) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Health Care | 22% | 6% |
Financials | 20% | 22% |
Telecommunication Services | 12% | 9% |
Energy | 11% | 5% |
Consumer Staples | 10% | 7% |
Utilities | 4% | 5% |
Industrials | 8% | 17% |
Materials | 8% | 10% |
Information Technology | 5% | 5% |
Consumer Discretionary | — | 14% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation, geographical diversification and sector diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 70. A complete list of portfolio holdings of the Portfolio is posted as of the month end on www.dws-investments.com on or about the 15th day of the following month. More frequent posting of portfolio holdings information may be made from time to time on www.dws-investments.com.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2008
DWS International VIP
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 93.1% |
Austria 2.1% |
Intercell AG* (a) (Cost $5,900,688) | 203,044 | 6,225,455 |
Brazil 1.1% |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA (ADR) (Cost $6,908,534) | 132,700 | 3,249,823 |
Canada 0.8% |
Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc. (Cost $4,038,322) | 31,221 | 2,264,543 |
China 2.1% |
China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. "H" (Cost $7,675,110) | 2,054,200 | 6,330,186 |
Denmark 3.5% |
Carlsberg AS "B" | 122,625 | 4,025,899 |
Novo Nordisk AS "B" | 127,500 | 6,488,396 |
(Cost $20,683,392) | 10,514,295 |
Finland 2.9% |
Fortum Oyj | 253,300 | 5,440,729 |
Nokia Oyj | 201,000 | 3,116,089 |
(Cost $15,817,151) | 8,556,818 |
France 8.7% |
Alstom SA | 50,830 | 3,001,655 |
AXA SA | 225,021 | 5,016,775 |
BNP Paribas | 91,224 | 3,852,060 |
Societe Generale | 100,059 | 5,067,741 |
Total SA | 166,273 | 9,064,817 |
(Cost $29,786,169) | 26,003,048 |
Germany 18.4% |
Allianz SE (Registered) | 57,948 | 6,215,391 |
BASF SE | 133,400 | 5,271,239 |
Bayer AG | 117,992 | 6,931,411 |
Deutsche Boerse AG | 83,700 | 6,096,062 |
Deutsche Telekom AG (Registered) | 441,000 | 6,700,361 |
E.ON AG | 128,504 | 5,196,337 |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA | 99,682 | 4,674,401 |
Gerresheimer AG | 128,308 | 3,517,674 |
Linde AG | 46,200 | 3,909,605 |
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG (Registered) | 39,700 | 6,238,736 |
(Cost $53,732,769) | 54,751,217 |
Hong Kong 2.2% |
China Mobile Ltd. (Cost $7,033,629) | 637,500 | 6,463,488 |
Ireland 1.0% |
CRH PLC (Cost $2,997,259) | 114,700 | 2,894,760 |
Italy 2.7% |
Intesa Sanpaolo | 1,337,500 | 4,817,583 |
Saipem SpA | 197,500 | 3,316,293 |
(Cost $16,369,994) | 8,133,876 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Japan 16.4% |
Astellas Pharma, Inc. | 124,100 | 5,049,802 |
Canon, Inc. | 189,150 | 5,937,710 |
East Japan Railway Co. | 85,500 | 6,657,465 |
Japan Tobacco, Inc. | 1,869 | 6,189,013 |
Mitsubishi Corp. | 250,500 | 3,516,630 |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 660,100 | 4,095,870 |
Nintendo Co., Ltd. | 11,600 | 4,456,661 |
Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp. | 81,000 | 4,334,502 |
Seven & I Holdings Co., Ltd. | 128,000 | 4,385,245 |
Terumo Corp. | 90,300 | 4,228,840 |
(Cost $52,715,201) | 48,851,738 |
Luxembourg 0.9% |
ArcelorMittal (Cost $4,915,693) | 114,170 | 2,751,863 |
Mexico 0.6% |
America Movil SAB de CV "L" (ADR) (Cost $3,372,337) | 59,600 | 1,847,004 |
Norway 2.4% |
DnB NOR ASA | 448,100 | 1,789,984 |
StatoilHydro ASA | 325,400 | 5,359,426 |
(Cost $14,620,371) | 7,149,410 |
Russia 1.1% |
Gazprom (ADR) (Cost $8,840,547) | 219,400 | 3,139,524 |
Singapore 1.2% |
United Overseas Bank Ltd. (Cost $5,690,961) | 397,000 | 3,583,743 |
Spain 3.1% |
Telefonica SA (Cost $7,881,341) | 411,463 | 9,223,134 |
Switzerland 13.9% |
ABB Ltd. (Registered)* | 329,231 | 4,962,898 |
Lonza Group AG (Registered) | 53,091 | 4,907,996 |
Nestle SA (Registered) | 239,973 | 9,457,954 |
Novartis AG (Registered) | 183,869 | 9,212,662 |
Roche Holding AG (Genusschein) | 61,048 | 9,397,344 |
Xstrata PLC | 366,059 | 3,412,633 |
(Cost $44,490,633) | 41,351,487 |
United Kingdom 8.0% |
AMEC PLC | 296,311 | 2,114,926 |
Babcock International Group PLC | 178,511 | 1,227,980 |
BAE Systems PLC | 427,314 | 2,328,969 |
BG Group PLC | 310,040 | 4,304,523 |
HSBC Holdings PLC | 254,314 | 2,434,097 |
Imperial Tobacco Group PLC | 179,325 | 4,790,332 |
Vodafone Group PLC | 3,363,709 | 6,771,529 |
(Cost $33,019,533) | 23,972,356 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $346,489,634) | 277,257,768 |
|
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Exchange Traded Fund 4.8% |
Japan |
iShares MSCI Japan Index Fund (a) (Cost $17,641,521) | 1,477,990 | 14,188,704 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 1.2% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 1.69% (b) (c) (Cost $3,581,750) | 3,581,750 | 3,581,750 |
|
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Cash Equivalents 1.6% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 1.42% (b) (Cost $4,912,228) | 4,912,228 | 4,912,228 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $372,625,133)+ | 100.7 | 299,940,450 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (0.7) | (2,180,816) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 297,759,634 |
* Non-income producing security.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $375,669,028. At December 31, 2008, net unrealized depreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $75,728,578. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $21,641,676 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $97,370,254.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2008 amounted to $3,462,631, which is 1.2% of net assets.(b) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(c) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.ADR: American Depositary Receipt
MSCI: Morgan Stanley Capital International
Fair Value Measurements
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the Portfolio's investments. For information on the Portfolio's policy regarding the valuation of investments and of the valuation inputs, and the aggregate levels used in the table below, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | Investments in Securities |
Level 1
| $ 28,271,348 |
Level 2
| 271,669,102 |
Level 3
| — |
Total | $ 299,940,450 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2008
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $364,131,155), including $3,462,631 of securities loaned | $ 291,446,472 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $3,581,750)* | 3,581,750 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $4,912,228) | 4,912,228 |
Total investments, at value (cost $372,625,133)
| 299,940,450 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $1,144,364)
| 1,139,056 |
Dividends receivable
| 528,481 |
Interest receivable
| 12,638 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 294,967 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 174,253 |
Other assets
| 13,892 |
Total assets
| 302,103,737 |
Liabilities |
Cash overdraft
| 3,198 |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 422,617 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 3,581,750 |
Accrued management fee
| 72,431 |
Accrued distriubtion service fee (Class B)
| 81 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 264,026 |
Total liabilities
| 4,344,103 |
Net assets, at value | $ 297,759,634 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 13,320,593 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | (72,684,683) |
Foreign currency | (22,154) |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| (120,039,058) |
Paid-in capital
| 477,184,936 |
Net assets, at value | $ 297,759,634 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($297,365,049 ÷ 45,605,566 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 6.52 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($394,585 ÷ 60,497 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 6.52 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $1,421,293)
| $ 18,201,162 |
Interest
| 49,110 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 203,706 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 759,041 |
Other income
| 6,749 |
Total Income
| 19,219,768 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 3,994,718 |
Administration fee
| 519,230 |
Custodian fee
| 473,256 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 9,785 |
Services to shareholders
| 2,789 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 3,228 |
Professional fees
| 94,496 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 27,641 |
Reports to shareholders
| 50,009 |
Other
| 67,427 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 5,242,579 |
Expense reductions
| (216,496) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 5,026,083 |
Net investment income (loss) | 14,193,685 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments (net of foreign taxes of $13,109)
| (117,379,961) |
Foreign currency
| (708,199) |
Payments by affiliates (See Note H)
| 304,364 |
| (117,783,796) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments (net of deferred foreign tax credit of $152,816)
| (202,765,850) |
Foreign currency
| (45,588) |
| (202,811,438) |
Net gain (loss) | (320,595,234) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ (306,401,549) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
| Years Ended December 31, |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2008 | 2007 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 14,193,685 | $ 11,097,935 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| (117,783,796) | 163,447,235 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (202,811,438) | (70,490,293) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| (306,401,549) | 104,054,877 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (7,239,383) | (17,645,331) |
Class B | (82,273) | (1,050,909) |
Net realized gains:
Class A | (94,147,000) | — |
Class B | (1,663,249) | — |
Total distributions
| (103,131,905) | (18,696,240) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 22,286,975 | 64,649,737 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 101,386,383 | 17,645,331 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (121,263,622) | (163,705,768) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| 2,409,736 | (81,410,700) |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 338,048 | 1,213,337 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 1,745,522 | 1,050,909 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (11,371,669) | (45,235,722) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (9,288,099) | (42,971,476) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (416,411,817) | (39,023,539) |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 714,171,451 | 753,194,990 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $13,320,593 and $7,187,701, respectively)
| $ 297,759,634 | $ 714,171,451 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 46,761,118 | 52,299,023 |
Shares sold
| 2,117,696 | 4,471,485 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 8,413,808 | 1,243,505 |
Shares redeemed
| (11,687,056) | (11,252,895) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (1,155,552) | (5,537,905) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 45,605,566 | 46,761,118 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 818,856 | 3,829,429 |
Shares sold
| 26,121 | 84,891 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 144,736 | 74,060 |
Shares redeemed
| (929,216) | (3,169,524) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (758,359) | (3,010,573) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 60,497 | 818,856 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 15.01 | $ 13.42 | $ 10.85 | $ 9.50 | $ 8.26 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .29e | .21d | .28c | .15 | .09 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (6.46) | 1.73 | 2.51 | 1.36 | 1.26 |
Total from investment operations | (6.17) | 1.94 | 2.79 | 1.51 | 1.35 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.17) | (.35) | (.22) | (.16) | (.11) |
Net realized gains | (2.15) | — | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (2.32) | (.35) | (.22) | (.16) | (.11) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 6.52 | $ 15.01 | $ 13.42 | $ 10.85 | $ 9.50 |
Total Return (%)
| (48.21)b,f | 14.59 | 25.91 | 16.17 | 16.53 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 297 | 702 | 702 | 558 | 533 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| 1.01 | .98 | .98 | 1.02 | 1.04 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .97 | .98 | .98 | 1.02 | 1.04 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 2.74e | 1.48d | 2.32c | 1.59 | 1.05 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 123 | 108 | 105 | 59 | 73 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.11 per share and 0.92% of average daily net assets, respectively. d Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.05 per share and 0.33% of average daily net assets, respectively. e Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.09 per share and 0.82% of average daily net assets, respectively. f Includes a reimbursement from the Advisor to reimburse the effect of losses incurred as the result of certain operation errors during the period. Excluding this reimbursement, total return would have been 0.06% lower.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 14.98 | $ 13.38 | $ 10.82 | $ 9.48 | $ 8.24 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .23e | .16d | .24c | .12 | .06 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (6.43) | 1.73 | 2.50 | 1.35 | 1.27 |
Total from investment operations | (6.20) | 1.89 | 2.74 | 1.47 | 1.33 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.11) | (.29) | (.18) | (.13) | (.09) |
Net realized gains | (2.15) | — | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (2.26) | (.29) | (.18) | (.13) | (.09) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 6.52 | $ 14.98 | $ 13.38 | $ 10.82 | $ 9.48 |
Total Return (%)
| (48.25)b,f | 14.25b | 25.44b | 15.71b | 16.24b |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| .40 | 12 | 51 | 40 | 35 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| 1.33 | 1.41 | 1.37 | 1.41 | 1.38 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| 1.28 | 1.39 | 1.36 | 1.37 | 1.35 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 2.42e | 1.07d | 1.94c | 1.24 | .74 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 123 | 108 | 105 | 59 | 73 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.11 per share and 0.92% of average daily net assets, respectively. d Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.05 per share and 0.33% of average daily net assets, respectively. e Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.09 per share and 0.82% of average daily net assets, respectively. f Includes a reimbursement from the Advisor to reimburse the effect of losses incurred as the result of certain operation errors during the period. Excluding this reimbursement, total return would have been 0.06% lower.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Health Care VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less then their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2008 are 0.90% and 1.28% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2008.
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. The Portfolio may focus its investments on certain industry sectors, thereby increasing its vulnerability to any single industry or regulatory development. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Health Care VIP — Class A [] S&P 500® Index [] S&P® GSSI Health Care Sector Index | The Standard & Poor's® 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The S&P® GSSI Health Care Sector Index is an unmanaged, market capitalization-weighted index of 133 stocks designed to measure the performance of companies in the health care sector. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45024/450246a23e94854234d3dd5a9abec2c3c2fc6ffb" alt="dvs1_g10k610" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Health Care VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | Life of Portfolio* |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $7,680 | $9,230 | $10,975 | $12,017 |
Average annual total return
| -23.20% | -2.64% | 1.88% | 2.42% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $6,300 | $7,696 | $8,953 | $8,325 |
Average annual total return
| -37.00% | -8.36% | -2.19% | -2.36% |
S&P GSSI Health Care Sector Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $7,641 | $8,721 | $10,390 | $10,354 |
Average annual total return
| -23.59% | -4.46% | .77% | .45% |
DWS Health Care VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | Life of Class** |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $7,650 | $9,134 | $10,775 | $14,531 |
Average annual total return
| -23.50% | -2.97% | 1.50% | 5.92% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $6,300 | $7,696 | $8,953 | $10,335 |
Average annual total return
| -37.00% | -8.36% | -2.19% | .51% |
S&P GSSI Health Care Sector Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $7,641 | $8,721 | $10,390 | $12,396 |
Average annual total return
| -23.59% | -4.46% | .77% | 3.35% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
* The Portfolio commenced operations on May 1, 2001. Index returns began on April 30, 2001.** The Portfolio commenced offering Class B shares on July 1, 2002. Index returns began on June 30, 2002.Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Health Care VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
• Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
• Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2008 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 824.60 | | $ 822.60 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 4.17 | | $ 5.77 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/08
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/08
| $ 1,020.56 | | $ 1,018.80 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 4.62 | | $ 6.39 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 366.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Health Care VIP
| .91% | | 1.26% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Management Summary December 31, 2008
DWS Health Care VIP
During a period of economic weakness and instability in the financial system, which led investors to favor more defensive sectors such as health care, DWS Health Care VIP posted a negative return but strongly outperformed the general market with a -23.20% total return for its most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (Class A shares, unadjusted for contract charges). In comparison, the Standard & Poor's® 500 (S&P 500) Index returned - -37.00% and the S&P GSSI Healthcare Sector Index returned -23.59% over the same period.
The portfolio's underweight positions in Medtronic, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. and UnitedHealth Group, Inc., relative to the benchmark, helped performance during the annual period.1 Medtronic shares declined due to deteriorating trends in four of its five major businesses, while Merck shares were negatively impacted by concerns over its cholesterol drug franchise following disappointing data from clinical studies. In addition, sales trends for the company's key drugs were weaker than expected. UnitedHealth shares also declined significantly, as the company lowered its earnings forecast to reflect pressure on profit margins from higher medical costs and weaker than expected enrollment trends. The largest detractors from the Portfolio's relative performance came from underweight positions in Pfizer, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. These companies' shares, representing meaningful weightings within the portfolio's benchmarks, held up better than industry averages during the period as investors favored more defensive, large-cap issues during the financial and economic crisis.
We believe that health care stocks should continue to outperform the general market as worries about the global economy and the credit crisis overshadow concerns over the potential impact of health care reform on sector financials. Despite the potential for declines in health care consumption due to higher drug co-payments, rising unemployment and the deferral of medical procedures, we think this sector is well positioned in the current environment. We expect health care reform to eventually lower overall health care spending. However, we are not convinced that major changes to the industry will be enacted and implemented before 2010.
The following person is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Portfolio.
Leefin Lai, CFA, CPA
Portfolio Manager
The following person serves as a consultant to the Advisor of the Portfolio.
Thomas E. Bucher, CFA
Consultant
The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
The S&P GSSI Health Care Sector Index is an unmanaged, market-capitalization-weighted index of 133 stocks designed to measure the performance of companies in the health care sector.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
1 "Overweight" means the portfolio holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. "Underweight" means the portfolio holds a lower weighting.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2008, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current and future portfolio holdings are subject to risk.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Health Care VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 98% | 99% |
Cash Equivalents | 2% | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Industry Diversification (As a % of Common Stocks) | 12/31/08 | 12/31/07 |
| | |
Pharmaceuticals | 31% | 31% |
Biotechnology | 26% | 21% |
Medical Supply & Specialty | 20% | 21% |
Health Care Services | 17% | 22% |
Life Sciences Equipment | 6% | 5% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation and industry diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 82. A complete list of portfolio holdings of the Portfolio is posted as of the month end on www.dws-investments.com on or about the 15th day of the following month. More frequent posting of portfolio holdings information may be made from time to time on www.dws-investments.com.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2008
DWS Health Care VIP
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 98.3% |
Health Care 98.3% |
Biotechnology 25.6% |
Acorda Therapeutics, Inc.* | 9,100 | 186,641 |
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* (a) | 23,500 | 850,465 |
Allos Therapeutics, Inc.* | 35,300 | 216,036 |
Amgen, Inc.* | 36,450 | 2,104,987 |
Biogen Idec, Inc.* | 25,720 | 1,225,044 |
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.* (a) | 37,100 | 660,380 |
Celera Corp.* | 33,800 | 376,194 |
Celgene Corp.* | 32,460 | 1,794,389 |
Cepheid, Inc.* | 17,400 | 180,612 |
Gen-Probe, Inc.* | 11,000 | 471,240 |
Genentech, Inc.* | 21,500 | 1,782,565 |
Genmab A/S* | 4,500 | 173,620 |
Genzyme Corp.* | 32,800 | 2,176,936 |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.* | 50,800 | 2,597,912 |
Human Genome Sciences, Inc.* | 48,200 | 102,184 |
Incyte Corp.* | 52,200 | 197,838 |
OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 5,200 | 203,060 |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 18,100 | 332,316 |
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 11,300 | 90,400 |
United Therapeutics Corp.* | 5,400 | 337,770 |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* (a) | 7,200 | 218,736 |
| 16,279,325 |
Health Care Services 16.1% |
Aetna, Inc. | 24,700 | 703,950 |
Allscripts-Misys Healthcare Solutions, Inc. (a) | 43,500 | 431,520 |
Covance, Inc.* | 8,900 | 409,667 |
CVS Caremark Corp. | 32,931 | 946,437 |
Express Scripts, Inc.* | 14,400 | 791,712 |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA | 24,097 | 1,129,984 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | 16,400 | 1,056,324 |
McKesson Corp. | 22,200 | 859,806 |
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.* | 22,268 | 933,252 |
Quality Systems, Inc. (a) | 9,500 | 414,390 |
Quest Diagnostics, Inc. | 24,300 | 1,261,413 |
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 21,900 | 582,540 |
WellPoint, Inc.* | 18,200 | 766,766 |
| 10,287,761 |
Life Sciences Tools & Services 5.8% |
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.* | 10,900 | 285,580 |
Illumina, Inc.* | 10,600 | 276,130 |
Life Technologies Corp.* | 17,028 | 396,932 |
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.* | 8,800 | 593,120 |
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. | 14,700 | 426,447 |
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.* | 50,000 | 1,703,500 |
| 3,681,709 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Medical Supply & Specialty 20.0% |
Alcon, Inc. | 8,400 | 749,196 |
Baxter International, Inc. | 49,600 | 2,658,064 |
Beckman Coulter, Inc. | 6,900 | 303,186 |
Becton, Dickinson & Co. | 27,600 | 1,887,564 |
C.R. Bard, Inc. | 15,800 | 1,331,308 |
Covidien Ltd. | 43,100 | 1,561,944 |
Hologic, Inc.* | 26,400 | 345,048 |
Masimo Corp.* | 11,600 | 346,028 |
Medtronic, Inc. | 34,900 | 1,096,558 |
ResMed, Inc.* | 10,200 | 382,296 |
Stryker Corp. (a) | 26,400 | 1,054,680 |
Wright Medical Group, Inc.* | 13,400 | 273,762 |
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.* | 18,900 | 763,938 |
| 12,753,572 |
Pharmaceuticals 30.8% |
Abbott Laboratories | 31,600 | 1,686,492 |
Allergan, Inc. | 18,600 | 749,952 |
Astellas Pharma, Inc. | 21,800 | 887,072 |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 61,500 | 1,429,875 |
Cardiome Pharma Corp.* | 22,000 | 100,100 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 32,100 | 1,292,667 |
Johnson & Johnson | 31,600 | 1,890,628 |
Merck & Co., Inc. | 52,400 | 1,592,960 |
Merck KGaA | 9,462 | 860,262 |
Mylan, Inc.* (a) | 92,100 | 910,869 |
Novartis AG (Registered) | 17,897 | 896,720 |
Pfizer, Inc. | 63,940 | 1,132,377 |
Roche Holding AG (Genusschein) | 14,711 | 2,264,519 |
Sanofi-Aventis | 7,538 | 478,768 |
Schering-Plough Corp. | 61,500 | 1,047,345 |
Shire PLC (ADR) | 17,400 | 779,172 |
Wyeth | 37,400 | 1,402,874 |
XenoPort, Inc.* | 9,500 | 238,261 |
| 19,640,913 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $56,129,449) | 62,643,280 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 6.1% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 1.69% (b) (c) (Cost $3,866,250) | 3,866,250 | 3,866,250 |
|
Cash Equivalents 1.8% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 1.42% (b) (Cost $1,166,346) | 1,166,346 | 1,166,346 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $61,162,045)+ | 106.2 | 67,675,876 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (6.2) | (3,944,170) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 63,731,706 |
* Non-income producing security.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $61,733,891. At December 31, 2008, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $5,941,985. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $14,546,491 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $8,604,506.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2008 amounted to $3,875,282, which is 6.1% of net assets.(b) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(c) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.ADR: American Depositary Receipt
Fair Value Measurements
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the Portfolio's investments. For information on the Portfolio's policy regarding the valuation of investments and of the valuation inputs, and the aggregate levels used in the table below, please refer to the Security Valuation section of Note A in the accompanying Notes to the Financial Statements.
Valuation Inputs | Investments in Securities |
Level 1
| $ 59,818,585 |
Level 2
| 7,857,291 |
Level 3
| — |
Total | $ 67,675,876 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2008
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $56,129,449), including $3,875,282 of securities loaned | $ 62,643,280 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $3,866,250)* | 3,866,250 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $1,166,346) | 1,166,346 |
Total investments, at value (cost $61,162,045)
| 67,675,876 |
Cash
| 7,698 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $78,358)
| 79,948 |
Receivable for investments sold
| 225,791 |
Dividends receivable
| 85,037 |
Interest receivable
| 5,956 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 61 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 19,992 |
Other assets
| 2,845 |
Total assets
| 68,103,204 |
Liabilities |
Payable for investments purchased
| 223,490 |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 152,105 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 3,866,250 |
Accrued management fee
| 34,689 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 707 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 94,257 |
Total liabilities
| 4,371,498 |
Net assets, at value | $ 63,731,706 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 724,957 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | 6,513,831 |
Foreign currency | 934 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| (589,149) |
Paid-in capital
| 57,081,133 |
Net assets, at value | $ 63,731,706 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($60,232,294 ÷ 6,373,629 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 9.45 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($3,499,412 ÷ 379,018 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 9.23 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $35,437)
| $ 1,356,362 |
Interest
| 1,294 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 46,802 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 131,903 |
Total Income
| 1,536,361 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 600,311 |
Administration fee
| 90,272 |
Custodian fee
| 14,355 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 11,468 |
Services to shareholders
| 419 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 4,587 |
Professional fees
| 59,999 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 4,905 |
Reports to shareholders
| 36,465 |
Other
| 21,239 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 844,020 |
Expense reductions
| (606) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 843,414 |
Net investment income (loss) | 692,947 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| (152,841) |
Foreign currency
| 61,295 |
| (91,546) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (24,348,732) |
Foreign currency
| (17,254) |
| (24,365,986) |
Net gain (loss) | (24,457,532) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ (23,764,585) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
| Years Ended December 31, |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 2008 | 2007 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 692,947 | $ 173,147 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| (91,546) | 15,451,366 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (24,365,986) | (1,128,994) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| (23,764,585) | 14,495,519 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (269,428) | — |
Net realized gains:
Class A | (14,518,785) | (6,096,998) |
Class B | (789,529) | (1,254,197) |
Total distributions
| (15,577,742) | (7,351,195) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 15,385,334 | 9,495,145 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 14,788,213 | 6,096,998 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (31,046,167) | (24,413,031) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (872,620) | (8,820,888) |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 674,757 | 827,879 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 789,529 | 1,254,197 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (1,414,568) | (18,374,489) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| 49,718 | (16,292,413) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (40,165,229) | (17,968,977) |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 103,896,935 | 121,865,912 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $724,957 and $254,916, respectively)
| $ 63,731,706 | $ 103,896,935 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 6,708,658 | 7,330,897 |
Shares sold
| 1,209,692 | 663,065 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 1,271,557 | 431,188 |
Shares redeemed
| (2,816,278) | (1,716,492) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (335,029) | (622,239) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 6,373,629 | 6,708,658 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 376,902 | 1,544,881 |
Shares sold
| 56,147 | 59,012 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 69,318 | 90,295 |
Shares redeemed
| (123,349) | (1,317,286) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| 2,116 | (1,167,979) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 379,018 | 376,902 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 14.68 | $ 13.77 | $ 13.02 | $ 12.00 | $ 10.95 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .09d | .03c | (.01)b | (.02) | (.03) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (3.08) | 1.75 | .81 | 1.04 | 1.08 |
Total from investment operations | (2.99) | 1.78 | .80 | 1.02 | 1.05 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.04) | — | — | — | — |
Net realized gains | (2.20) | (.87) | (.05) | — | — |
Total distributions | (2.24) | (.87) | (.05) | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 9.45 | $ 14.68 | $ 13.77 | $ 13.02 | $ 12.00 |
Total Return (%)
| (23.20) | 13.20 | 6.17b | 8.50 | 9.59 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 60 | 98 | 101 | 109 | 109 |
Ratio of expenses (%)
| .92 | .93 | .89 | .88 | .88 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .79d | .19c | (.03)b | (.18) | (.29) |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 24 | 37 | 47 | 43 | 77 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.003 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.02%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.02% lower. c Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.02 per share and 0.13% of average daily net assets, respectively. d Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.03 per share and 0.28% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 14.40 | $ 13.55 | $ 12.87 | $ 11.91 | $ 10.91 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .05d | (.03)c | (.06)b | (.07) | (.08) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (3.02) | 1.75 | .79 | 1.03 | 1.08 |
Total from investment operations | (2.97) | 1.72 | .73 | .96 | 1.00 |
Less distributions from: Net realized gains | (2.20) | (.87) | (.05) | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 9.23 | $ 14.40 | $ 13.55 | $ 12.87 | $ 11.91 |
Total Return (%)
| (23.50) | 12.88 | 5.77b | 8.06 | 9.17 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 3 | 5 | 21 | 23 | 20 |
Ratio of expenses (%)
| 1.27 | 1.34 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 1.27 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .43d | (.22)c | (.42)b | (.57) | (.68) |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 24 | 37 | 47 | 43 | 77 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.003 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.02%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.02% lower. c Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.02 per share and 0.13% of average daily net assets, respectively. d Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.03 per share and 0.28% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Notes to Financial Statements
A. Significant Accounting Policies
DWS Variable Series I (the "Series") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as an open-end, registered management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. The Series consists of six diversified portfolios: DWS Bond VIP, DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Capital Growth VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP, DWS International VIP and DWS Health Care VIP (individually or collectively hereinafter referred to as a "Portfolio" or the "Portfolios"). The Series is intended to be the underlying investment vehicle for variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies to be offered by the separate accounts of certain life insurance companies ("Participating Insurance Companies").
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest. DWS Bond VIP offers only one class of shares (Class A shares). DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Capital Growth VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP, DWS International VIP and DWS Health Care VIP each offer two classes of shares (Class A shares and Class B shares). Class B shares are subject to Rule 12b-1 distribution fees under the 1940 Act and record keeping fees equal to an annual rate of 0.25% and up to 0.15%, respectively, of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares of the applicable Portfolio. Class A shares are not subject to such fees. On May 22, 2008, Class B shares of DWS Bond VIP were liquidated.
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain portfolio-level expenses and expense reductions, if any, are borne pro rata on the basis of relative net assets by the holders of all classes of shares, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class (including the applicable 12b-1 distribution fees and record keeping fees). Differences in class-level expenses may result in payment of different per share dividends by class. All shares have equal rights with respect to voting subject to class-specific arrangements.
The Series' financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of management estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The policies described below are followed consistently by the Series in the preparation of the financial statements for its Portfolios.
Security Valuation. Investments are stated at value determined as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading. Equity securities are valued at the most recent sale price or official closing price reported on the exchange (US or foreign) or over-the-counter market on which the security is traded most extensively. Securities for which no sales are reported are valued at the calculated mean between the most recent bid and asked quotations on the relevant market or, if a mean cannot be determined, at the most recent bid quotation.
Debt securities are valued by independent pricing services approved by the Trustees of the Series. If the pricing services are unable to provide valuations, securities are valued at the most recent bid quotation or evaluated price, as applicable, obtained from one or more broker-dealers. Such services may use various pricing techniques which take into account appropriate factors such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other data, as well as broker quotes.
Money market instruments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of sixty days or less, maturing at par, are valued at amortized cost. Investments in open-end investment companies and Cash Management QP Trust are valued at their net asset value each business day.
Securities and other assets for which market quotations are not readily available or for which the above valuation procedures are deemed not to reflect fair value are valued in a manner that is intended to reflect their fair value as determined in accordance with procedures approved by the Trustees. The Series may use a fair valuation model to value international equity securities in order to adjust for events which may occur between the close of the foreign exchanges and the close of the New York Stock Exchange.
The Portfolio adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("FAS 157"), effective at the beginning of the Portfolio's fiscal year. FAS 157 establishes a three-tier hierarchy to maximize the use of observable market data and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and requires additional disclosure about the classification of fair value measurements.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Portfolio's investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 includes other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds and credit risk). Level 3 includes significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments). The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The aggregate value by input level, as of December 31, 2008, for the Portfolio's investments, as well as a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used in determining value, is included at the end of the Portfolio's Investment Portfolio.
New Accounting Pronouncement. In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 ("FAS 161"), "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosure about an entity's derivative and hedging activities including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. FAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Management is currently reviewing the enhanced disclosure requirements for the adoption of FAS 161.
Securities Lending. The Portfolio may lend securities to financial institutions. The Portfolio retains beneficial ownership of the securities it has loaned and continues to receive interest and dividends paid by the issuer of securities and to participate in any changes in their market value. The Portfolio requires the borrowers of the securities to maintain collateral with the Portfolio consisting of liquid, unencumbered assets having a value at least equal to the value of the securities loaned. When the collateral falls below specified amounts, the lending agents will use their best efforts to obtain additional collateral on the next business day to meet required amounts under the security lending agreement. The Portfolio may invest the cash collateral into a joint trading account in an affiliated money market fund pursuant to Exemptive Orders issued by the SEC. The Portfolio receives compensation for lending its securities either in the form of fees or by earning interest on invested cash collateral net of borrower rebates and fees paid to a lending agent. Either the Portfolio or the borrower may terminate the loan. There may be risks of delay and costs in recovery of securities or even loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower of the securities fail financially. The Portfolio is also subject to all investment risks associated with the reinvestment of any cash collateral received, including, but not limited to, interest rate, credit and liquidity risk associated with such investments.
Futures Contracts. A futures contract is an agreement between a buyer or seller and an established futures exchange or its clearinghouse in which the buyer or seller agrees to take or make a delivery of a specific amount of a financial instrument at a specified price on a specific date (settlement date). Each Portfolio may use futures in circumstances where portfolio management believes they offer an economic means of gaining exposure to a particular asset class or to keep cash on hand to meet shareholder redemptions or other needs while maintaining exposure to the market. In addition, the DWS Bond VIP, DWS Capital Growth VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP and DWS Health Care VIP Portfolios may use futures for hedging and for risk management or for non-hedging purposes to seek to enhance potential gains.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit with a financial intermediary an amount ("initial margin") equal to a certain percentage of the face value indicated in the futures contract. Subsequent payments ("variation margin") are made or received by the Portfolio dependent upon the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security and are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the Portfolio. When entering into a closing transaction, the Portfolio will realize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contract to sell and the futures contract to buy. Futures contracts are valued at the most recent settlement price.
Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts, including the risk that an illiquid secondary market will limit the Portfolio's ability to close out a futures contract prior to the settlement date and that a change in the value of a futures contract may not correlate exactly with the changes in the value of the securities or currencies hedged. When utilizing futures contracts to hedge, the Portfolio gives up the opportunity to profit from favorable price movements in the hedged positions during the term of the contract. Risk of loss may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Foreign Currency Translations. The books and records of the Portfolios are maintained in US dollars. Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into US dollars at the prevailing exchange rates at period end. Purchases and sales of investment securities, income and expenses are translated into US dollars at the prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of the transactions.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions represent net gains and losses between trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, the disposition of forward foreign currency exchange contracts and foreign currencies, and the difference between the amount of net investment income accrued and the US dollar amount actually received. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed but is included with net realized and unrealized gain/appreciation and loss/depreciation on investments.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts. A forward foreign currency exchange contract ("forward currency contract") is a commitment to purchase or sell a foreign currency at the settlement date at a negotiated rate. The Portfolios may enter into forward currency contracts in order to hedge their exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on their foreign currency denominated portfolio holdings and to facilitate transactions in foreign currency denominated securities. The Portfolio may also engage in forward currency contracts for non-hedging purposes.
Forward currency contracts are valued at the prevailing forward exchange rate of the underlying currencies and unrealized gain (loss) is recorded daily. Sales and purchases of forward currency contracts having the same settlement date and broker are offset and any gain (loss) is realized on the date of offset; otherwise, gain (loss) is realized on settlement date. Realized and unrealized gains and losses which represent the difference between the value of a forward currency contract to buy and a forward currency contract to sell are included in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from foreign currency related transactions.
Certain risks may arise upon entering into forward currency contracts from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Additionally, when utilizing forward currency contracts to hedge, the Portfolio gives up the opportunity to profit from favorable exchange rate movements during the term of the contract.
Mortgage Dollar Rolls. DWS Bond VIP may enter into mortgage dollar rolls in which the Portfolio sells to a bank or broker/dealer (the "counterparty") mortgage-backed securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously contracts to repurchase similar, but not identical, securities on a fixed date. The counterparty receives all principal and interest payments, including prepayments, made on the security while it is the holder. The Portfolio receives compensation as consideration for entering into the commitment to repurchase. The compensation is paid in the form of a lower price for the security upon its repurchase, or alternatively, a fee. Mortgage dollar rolls may be renewed with a new sale and repurchase price and a cash settlement made at each renewal without physical delivery of the securities subject to the contract.
Certain risks may arise upon entering into mortgage dollar rolls from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their commitments. Additionally, the value of such securities may change adversely before the Portfolio is able to repurchase them. There can be no assurance that the Portfolio's use of the cash that it receives from a mortgage dollar roll will provide a return that exceeds its costs.
Senior Loans. DWS Bond VIP may invest in Senior Loans. Senior Loans are portions of loans originated by banks and sold in pieces to investors. These US dollar-denominated fixed and floating rate loans ("Loans") in which the Portfolio invests, are arranged between the borrower and one or more financial institutions ("Lenders"). These loans are corporate obligations often issued in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, leveraged buy-outs and refinancings. The Portfolio invests in such Loans in the form of participations in Loans ("Participations") or assignments of all or a portion of Loans from third parties ("Assignments"). Participations typically result in the Portfolio having a contractual relationship only with the Lender, not with the borrower. The Portfolio has the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled from the Lender selling the Participation and only upon receipt by the Lender of the payments from the borrower. In connection with purchasing Participations, the Portfolio generally has no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the Loan, or any rights of set-off against the borrower, and the Portfolio will not benefit directly from any collateral supporting the Loan in which it has purchased the Participation. As a result, the Portfolio assumes the credit risk of both the borrower and the Lender that is selling the Participation. Assignments typically result in the Portfolio having a direct contractual relationship with the borrower, and the Portfolio may enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement. All Senior Loans involve interest rate risk, liquidity risk and credit risk, including the potential default or insolvency of the borrower.
Taxes. Each Portfolio is treated as a separate taxpayer as provided for in the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. It is each Portfolio's policy to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which are applicable to regulated investment companies, and to distribute all of its taxable income to the separate accounts of the Participating Insurance Companies which hold its shares.
Additionally, based on the Series' understanding of the tax rules and rates related to income, gains and transactions for the foreign jurisdictions in which each Portfolio invests, the Series will provide for foreign taxes, and where appropriate, deferred foreign taxes.
At December 31, 2008, the following Portfolios had an approximate net tax basis capital loss carryforward which may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until the following expiration dates, whichever occurs first:
Portfolio | Capital Loss Carryforwards ($) | Expiration Date | Capital Loss Carryforwards Utilized ($) | Capital Loss Carryforwards Expired ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 4,957,000 | 12/31/2014-12/31/2016 | — | — |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 27,889,000 | 12/31/2010-12/31/2016 | — | — |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 227,747,000 | 12/31/2009-12/31/2012 | 29,828,000 | 19,244,000 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 3,019,000 | 12/31/2016 | — | — |
DWS International VIP
| 77,707,000 | 12/31/2016 | — | — |
In addition, from November 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008, DWS Bond VIP, DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Capital Growth VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP, DWS International VIP and DWS Health Care VIP incurred approximately $16,439,000, $10,255,000, 8,359,000, 10,758,000, 39,288,000 and $736,000, respectively, of net realized capital losses. As permitted by tax regulations, the Portfolios intend to elect to defer these losses and treat them as arising in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
At December 31, 2008, DWS Capital Growth VIP had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $227,747,000, of which a portion was inherited from its mergers with the SVS Eagle Focused Large Cap Growth Portfolio, Scudder Growth Portfolio, DWS Oak Strategic Equity VIP and DWS Janus Growth Opportunities VIP, and which is included in the table above and may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until the expiration dates, range from December 31, 2009, to December 31, 2012, whichever occurs first, and which may be subject to certain limitations under Section 382-384 of the Internal Revenue Code. DWS Capital Growth VIP utilized approximately $8,084,000 of non-merger related losses. In addition, the Portfolio utilized approximately $21,744,000 of the inherited amounts, which is included in the table above. Due to certain limitations under Sections 382-384 of the Internal Revenue Code, approximately $19,244,000 of the losses from SVS Eagle Focused Large Cap Growth Portfolio and Scudder Growth Portfolio expired and approximately $332,000 of the losses from DWS Janus Growth Opportunities VIP cannot be used. These losses are excluded from the capital loss carryforward amount of $227,747,000 disclosed above.
Each Portfolio has reviewed the tax positions for the open tax years as of December 31, 2008 and has determined that no provision for income tax is required in each Portfolio's financial statements. Each of the Portfolio's federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
Distribution of Income and Gains. Each Portfolio will declare and distribute dividends from their net investment income, if any, annually, although additional distributions may be made if necessary. Net realized gains from investment transactions, in excess of available capital loss carryforwards, would be taxable to each Portfolio if not distributed, and, therefore, will be distributed to shareholders at least annually.
The timing and characterization of certain income and capital gains distributions are determined annually in accordance with federal tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences primarily relate to investments in foreign denominated investments, investments in forward foreign currency exchange contracts, passive foreign investment companies, post October loss deferrals and certain securities sold at a loss. As a result, net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions for a reporting period may differ significantly from distributions during such period. Accordingly, each Portfolio may periodically make reclassifications among certain of its capital accounts without impacting the net asset value of the Portfolio.
At December 31, 2008, the Portfolios' components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax-basis are as follows:
Portfolio | Undistributed Ordinary Income ($)* | Undistributed Net Long-Term Capital Gains ($) | Capital Loss Carryforwards ($) | Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 11,876,139 | — | (4,957,000) | (28,504,179) |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 1,938,429 | — | (27,889,000) | (32,890,694) |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 7,945,917 | — | (227,747,000) | 10,574,440 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 2,083,686 | — | (3,019,000) | (20,090,640) |
DWS International VIP
| 13,320,593 | — | (77,707,000) | (75,728,578) |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 724,957 | 718,209 | — | 5,941,985 |
In addition, the tax character of distributions paid to shareholders by the Portfolios is summarized as follows:
| Distributions from Ordinary Income ($)* Years Ended December 31, | Distributions from Long-Term Capital Gains ($) Years Ended December 31, |
Portfolio | 2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 |
DWS Bond VIP
| 10,914,208 | 10,397,091 | — | — |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 15,760,111 | 3,685,275 | 26,232,152 | 4,265,414 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 9,451,337 | 7,146,340 | — | — |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 979,171 | 5,220,901 | 40,011,833 | 25,733,820 |
DWS International VIP
| 7,386,477 | 18,696,240 | 95,745,428 | — |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 3,006,032 | — | 12,571,710 | 7,351,195 |
* For tax purposes short-term capital gains distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.Expenses. Expenses of the Series arising in connection with a specific Portfolio are allocated to that Portfolio. Other Series expenses which cannot be directly attributed to a Portfolio are apportioned among the Portfolios in the Series.
Contingencies. In the normal course of business, each Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. Each Portfolio's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Portfolio that have not yet been made. However, based on experience, each Portfolio expects the risk of loss to be remote.
Other. For each Portfolio, investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date plus one basis for daily net asset value calculations. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are reported on trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis net of foreign withholding taxes. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date net of foreign withholding taxes. Certain dividends from foreign securities may be recorded subsequent to the ex-dividend date as soon as the Portfolio is informed of such dividends. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis. All discounts and premiums are accreted/amortized for both tax and financial reporting purposes.
B. Purchases and Sales of Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2008, purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) were as follows:
Portfolio | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
excluding US Treasury Obligations | 116,593,956 | 126,836,594 |
US Treasury Obligations | 264,754,396 | 288,981,537 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 192,386,286 | 234,069,964 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 182,722,249 | 315,927,818 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 47,740,750 | 96,017,563 |
DWS International VIP
| 630,020,593 | 730,062,614 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 20,839,055 | 35,904,837 |
C. Related Parties
Under the Investment Management Agreement with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA" or the "Advisor"), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, the Advisor directs the investments of the Portfolios in accordance with their investment objectives, policies and restrictions. The Advisor determines the securities, instruments and other contracts relating to investments to be purchased, sold or entered into by the Portfolios.
Under the Investment Management Agreement with the Advisor, the Portfolios pay a monthly management fee, based on the average daily net assets of each Portfolio, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly, at the annual rates shown below:
Portfolio | Annual Management Fee Rate |
DWS Bond VIP
first $250 million of average daily net assets | .390% |
next $750 million of average daily net assets | .365% |
over $1 billion of average daily net assets | .340% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
first $250 million of average daily net assets | .390% |
next $750 million of average daily net assets | .365% |
over $1 billion of average daily net assets | .340% |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
first $250 million of average daily net assets | .390% |
next $750 million of average daily net assets | .365% |
over $1 billion of average daily net assets | .340% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
first $500 million of average daily net assets | .890% |
next $500 million of average daily net assets | .875% |
next $1 billion of average daily net assets | .860% |
over $2 billion of average daily net assets | .845% |
DWS International VIP
first $500 million of average daily net assets | .790% |
over $500 million of average daily net assets | .640% |
DWS Health Care VIP
first $250 million of average daily net assets | .665% |
next $750 million of average daily net assets | .640% |
next $1.5 billion of average daily net assets | .615% |
next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets | .595% |
next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets | .565% |
next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets | .555% |
next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets | .545% |
over $12.5 billion of average daily net assets | .535% |
Prior to December 1, 2008, Aberdeen Asset Management, Inc. ("AAMI") and Aberdeen Asset Management Investment Services Limited ("AAMISL") served as DWS Bond VIP's subadvisor and sub-subadvisor, respectively. AAMI was responsible for the day to day operation of the high-yield and core bond, active fixed-income and high-yield portions of DWS Bond VIP. AAMISL was responsible for the day-to-day management of the foreign securities, foreign currencies and related investments for DWS Bond VIP. The Portfolio's board has approved the termination of AAMI and AAMISL as the Portfolio's subadvisor and sub-subadvisor, respectively. Effective December 1, 2008, the Advisor assumed all day-to-day advisory responsibilities that were previously delegated to AAMI and AAMISL.
For the period from January 1, 2008 through April 30, 2008, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Bond VIP Class B
| 1.03% |
In addition, for the period from January 1, 2008 through September 30, 2008, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Bond VIP Class A
| .63% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class A
| .99% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class B
| 1.39% |
In addition, for the period from October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class A
| .95% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class B
| 1.35% |
DWS Health Care VIP Class B
| 1.49% |
In addition, for the period from January 1, 2008 through April 30, 2010, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class A
| .49% |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class B
| .82% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP Class A
| .54% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP Class B
| .87% |
DWS International VIP Class A
| .96% |
DWS International VIP Class B
| 1.29% |
In addition, for the period from January 1, 2008 through April 27, 2010, the Advisor has contractually agreed to waive 0.01% of the management fee for DWS Growth & Income VIP.
Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2008, the total management fee, management fee waived, and effective management fee rate are as follows:
Portfolio | Total Aggregated ($) | Waived ($) | Annual Effective Rate |
DWS Bond VIP
| 782,296 | — | .39% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 592,051 | 83,657 | .33% |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 3,273,016 | 111,183 | .36% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 2,040,460 | 281,092 | .77% |
DWS International VIP
| 3,994,718 | 211,855 | .73% |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 600,311 | — | .67% |
In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor waived record keeping expenses of Class B shares of each Portfolio as follows:
Portfolio | Waived ($) |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 2,532 |
DWS International VIP
| 585 |
Administration Fee. Pursuant to an Administrative Services Agreement, DIMA provides most administrative services to the Series. For all services provided under the Administrative Services Agreement, each Portfolio pays the Advisor an annual fee ("Administration Fee") of 0.10% of each Portfolio's average daily net assets, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor received an Administration Fee as follows:
Portfolio | Total Aggregated ($) | Unpaid at December 31, 2008 ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 200,589 | 13,039 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 151,808 | 7,812 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 879,862 | 50,075 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 229,265 | 10,114 |
DWS International VIP
| 519,230 | 24,304 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 90,272 | 5,275 |
Service Provider Fees. DWS Investments Service Company ("DISC"), an affiliate of the Advisor, is the transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent for the Series. Pursuant to a sub-transfer agency agreement between DISC and DST Systems, Inc. ("DST"), DISC has delegated certain transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent functions to DST. DISC compensates DST out of the shareholder servicing fee it receives from each Portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the amounts charged to the Portfolios by DISC were as follows:
Portfolio | Total Aggregated ($) | Waived ($) | Unpaid at December 31, 2008 ($) |
DWS Bond VIP Class A
| 741 | — | 189 |
DWS Bond VIP Class B
| 19 | — | — |
DWS Growth & Income VIP Class A
| 622 | 241 | 381 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP Class B
| 121 | — | 23 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class A
| 886 | 886 | — |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class B
| 94 | 94 | — |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class A
| 501 | 501 | — |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class B
| 159 | — | 63 |
DWS International VIP Class A
| 805 | 805 | — |
DWS International VIP Class B
| 45 | — | — |
DWS Health Care VIP Class A
| 254 | — | 57 |
DWS Health Care VIP Class B
| 99 | — | 33 |
DWS Investments Distributors, Inc. ("DIDI"), also an affiliate of the Advisor, is the Series' Distributor. In accordance with the Master Distribution Plan, DIDI receives 12b-1 fees of 0.25% of average daily net assets of Class B shares. Pursuant to the Master Distribution Plan, DIDI remits these fees to the Participating Insurance Companies for various costs incurred or paid by these companies in connection with marketing and distribution of Class B shares. These fees are detailed in each Portfolio's Statement of Operations.
Typesetting and Filing Service Fees. Under an agreement with DIMA, DIMA is compensated for providing typesetting and certain regulatory filing services to the Portfolios. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the amount charged to the Portfolios by DIMA included in the Statement of Operations under "reports to shareholders" was as follows:
Portfolio | Total Aggregated ($) | Unpaid at December 31, 2008 ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 4,623 | 2,567 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 8,322 | 2,495 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 7,133 | 2,193 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 9,453 | 2,367 |
DWS International VIP
| 9,460 | 3,345 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 8,427 | 3,447 |
Trustees' Fees and Expenses. Each Portfolio paid each Trustee not affiliated with the Advisor retainer fees plus specified amounts for various committee services and for the Board Chairperson and Vice Chairperson.
In connection with the board consolidation on April 1, 2008, of the two DWS Funds Boards of Trustees, certain Independent Board Members retired prior to their normal retirement date, and received a one-time retirement benefit. DIMA has agreed to reimburse the Portfolios for the cost of this benefit. During the period ended December 31, 2008, each Portfolio paid its allocated portion, as follows, of the retirement benefit to the non-continuing Independent Board Members, and each Portfolio was reimbursed by DIMA for this payment:
Portfolio | Amount ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 1,213 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 988 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 5,091 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 1,446 |
DWS International VIP
| 3,251 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 535 |
Cash Management QP Trust. Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Series may invest in the Cash Management QP Trust (the ``QP Trust''), and other affiliated funds managed by the Advisor. The QP Trust seeks to provide as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity. The QP Trust does not pay the Advisor a management fee for the affiliated funds' investments in the QP Trust.
D. Investing in Emerging Markets
The DWS Bond VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP and DWS International VIP may invest in emerging markets. Investing in emerging markets may involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in the United States of America. These risks include revaluation of currencies, high rates of inflation, repatriation restrictions on income and capital, and future adverse political, social and economic developments. Moreover, securities issued in these markets may be less liquid, subject to government ownership controls or delayed settlements and may have prices more volatile than those of comparable securities of issuers in the United States of America.
E. Fee Reductions
DWS Bond VIP, DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Capital Growth VIP and DWS Health Care VIP have entered into an arrangement with their custodian whereby credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances are used to reduce a portion of the custodian expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the custodian fees were reduced as follows:
Portfolio | Custody Credits ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 556 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 40 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 132 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 71 |
F. Ownership of the Portfolios
At the end of the period, the beneficial ownership in the Portfolios was as follows:
DWS Bond VIP: One participating insurance company was an owner of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, owning 63%.
DWS Growth & Income VIP: Three participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 32%, 28% and 15%. One participating insurance company was an owner of record, owning 89% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS Capital Growth VIP: Four participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 40%, 23%, 11% and 10%. One participating insurance company was an owner of record, owning 92% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS Global Opportunities VIP: Three participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 53%, 18% and 11%. Two participating insurance companies were owners of record, each owning 63% and 35% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS International VIP: Two participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 37% and 16%. Three participating insurance companies were owners of record, each owning 65%, 20% and 15% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS Health Care VIP: Two participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 70% and 20%. One participating insurance company was an owner of record, owning 100% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
G. Line of Credit
The Series and other affiliated funds (the "Participants") share in a $490 million revolving credit facility provided by a syndication of banks. The Portfolio may borrow for temporary or emergency purposes, including the meeting of redemption requests that otherwise might require the untimely disposition of securities. The Participants are charged an annual commitment fee which is allocated based on net assets, among each of the Participants. Interest is calculated at the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.35 percent. Each Portfolio may borrow up to a maximum of 33 percent of its net assets under the agreement.
H. Payments Made by Affiliates
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor fully reimbursed DWS Bond VIP $221 for losses incurred on trades executed incorrectly. The amount of the losses was less than 0.01% of the Portfolio's average net asset, thus having no impact on the Portfolio's total return.
In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor fully reimbursed DWS International VIP $304,364 for losses incurred on trades executed incorrectly.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Trustees and Shareholders of DWS Variable Series I:
In our opinion, the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the investment portfolios, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the six Portfolios (identified in Note A) of DWS Variable Series I (the "Series") at December 31, 2008 and the results of each of their operations, the changes in each of their net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Series' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2008 by correspondence with the custodians and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Boston, Massachusetts PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February 13, 2009
Tax Information (Unaudited)
DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP, DWS International VIP and DWS Health Care VIP paid distributions of $1.46, $2.45, $2.15 and $1.81 per share, respectively, from net long-term capital gains during their year ended December 31, 2008, of which 100% represents 15% rate gains.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, DWS Health Care VIP designates approximately $804,000 as capital gain dividends for its year ended December 31, 2008, of which 100% represents 15% rate gains.
For corporate shareholders of DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Capital Growth VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP and DWS Health Care VIP, 74%, 100%, 42% and 100%, respectively, of their respective income dividends paid during the Portfolios' fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 qualified for the dividends received deduction.
DWS Global Opportunities VIP and DWS International VIP paid foreign taxes of $236,000 and $1,140,104, respectively, and earned $1,947,000 and $14,248,491, respectively, of foreign source income during the year ended December 31, 2008. Pursuant to Section 853 of the Internal Revenue Code, DWS Global Opportunities VIP and DWS International VIP designate $0.01 and $0.02 per share, respectively, as foreign taxes paid and $0.06 and $0.31 per share, respectively, as income earned from foreign sources for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Please consult a tax advisor if you have questions about federal or state income tax laws, or on how to prepare your tax returns. If you have specific questions about your account, please call (800) 728-3337.
Proxy Voting
The Series' policies and procedures for voting proxies for portfolio securities and information about how the Series voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30 are available on our Web site — www.dws-investments.com (click on "proxy voting"at the bottom of the page) — or on the SEC's Web site — www.sec.gov. To obtain a written copy of the Series' policies and procedures without charge, upon request, call us toll free at (800) 621-1048.
Investment Management Agreement Approval
DWS Bond VIP
The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of your Fund's investment management agreement (the "Agreement") with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA"), the sub-advisory agreement (the "Sub-Advisory Agreement") between DIMA and Aberdeen Asset Management, Inc. ("AAMI"), and the sub-sub-advisory agreement (the "Sub-Sub-Advisory Agreement," and together with the Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, the "Agreements") between AAMI and Aberdeen Asset Management Investment Services Limited ("Aberdeen IS") in September 2008. As noted below, in the case of AAMI and Aberdeen IS, the Board also determined to terminate the Sub-Advisory Agreement and Sub-Sub-Advisory Agreement as of December 1, 2008.
In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreements, shareholders should know that:
• At the present time, all but one of your Fund's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
• The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board's Contract Committee, in coordination with the Board's Fixed Income and Quant Oversight Committee, reviewed comprehensive materials received from DIMA, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund's performance, fees and expenses, and profitability compiled by the Fund's independent fee consultant. The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund.
• The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel (and, as needed, other advisors) to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by the Fund's independent fee consultant in the course of their review of the Fund's contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations (the "IFC Report").
• In connection with reviewing the Agreements, the Board also reviewed the terms of the administrative services agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
• Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Independent Trustees as a group. The Independent Trustees reviewed the Contract Committee's findings and recommendations and presented their recommendations to the full Board.
In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DIMA and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DIMA managed the Fund, and that the Agreement was approved by the Fund's shareholders at a special meeting held in 2006. DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Board believes that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund's Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's, AAMI's and Aberdeen IS's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreements, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreements. The Board noted that, under the Agreements, DIMA, AAMI and Aberdeen IS provide portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DIMA provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel, the resources made available to such personnel, the ability of DIMA, AAMI and Aberdeen IS to attract and retain high-quality personnel, and the organizational depth and stability of DIMA, AAMI and Aberdeen IS. The Board reviewed the Fund's performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market indices and a peer universe compiled by the independent fee consultant using information supplied by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper"). The Board also noted that it has put a process into place of identifying "Focus Funds" (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to their benchmark or a peer group compiled by Lipper), and receives more frequent reporting and information from DIMA regarding such funds, along with DIMA's remedial plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007, the Fund's performance (Class A shares) was in the 3rd quartile, 3rd quartile and 2nd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has underperformed its benchmark in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board recognized that there have been significant changes in the Fund's management structure, including the termination of AAMI and Aberdeen IS as the Fund's sub-advisor and sub-sub-advisor, respectively, and the introduction of a new portfolio management team effective December 1, 2008.
On the basis of this evaluation and the ongoing review of investment results by the Board, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA, AAMI and Aberdeen IS historically have been and continue to be satisfactory.
Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's investment management fee schedule, sub-advisory and sub-sub-advisory fee schedules, operating expenses, and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Lipper and the independent fee consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund, which include the 0.10% fee paid to DIMA under the Fund's administrative services agreement, were equal to the median (2nd quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007). With respect to the sub-advisory and sub-sub-advisory fees paid to AAMI and Aberdeen IS, the Board noted that the fees are paid by DIMA and AAMI, respectively, out of their fees and not directly by the Fund. The Board noted that the Fund's Class A shares' total (net) operating expenses were expected to be higher than the median (3rd quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007). The Board considered the Fund's management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DIMA and certain of its affiliates for comparable mutual funds and considered differences in fund and fee structures between the DWS Funds. The Board also considered how the Fund's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size).
On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA, AAMI and Aberdeen IS.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DIMA under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs and pre-tax profits realized by DIMA from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of the DWS Investments organization with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board reviewed DIMA's methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by DIMA in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Investments fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund's management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Other Benefits to DIMA and Its Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DIMA and its affiliates, including any fees received by DIMA for administrative services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DIMA for distribution services. The Board also considered benefits to DIMA related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities, along with the incidental public relations benefits to DIMA related to DWS Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS Investments products and services. The Board concluded that management fees were reasonable in light of these fallout benefits.
Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board (including a majority of the Independent Trustees) determined that the continuation of the Agreements is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreements.
DWS Growth & Income VIP
The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of your Fund's investment management agreement (the "Agreement") with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA") in September 2008.
In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreement, shareholders should know that:
• At the present time, all but one of your Fund's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
• The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board's Contract Committee, in coordination with the Board's Fixed Income and Quant Oversight Committee, reviewed comprehensive materials received from DIMA, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund's performance, fees and expenses, and profitability compiled by the Fund's independent fee consultant. The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund.
• The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel (and, as needed, other advisors) to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by the Fund's independent fee consultant in the course of their review of the Fund's contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations (the "IFC Report").
• In connection with reviewing the Agreement, the Board also reviewed the terms of the Fund's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administrative services agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
• Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Independent Trustees as a group. The Independent Trustees reviewed the Contract Committee's findings and recommendations and presented their recommendations to the full Board.
In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DIMA and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DIMA managed the Fund, and that the Agreement was approved by the Fund's shareholders at a special meeting held in 2006. DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Board believes that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund's Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreement, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, DIMA provides portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DIMA provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel, the resources made available to such personnel, the ability of DIMA to attract and retain high-quality personnel, and the organizational depth and stability of DIMA. The Board reviewed the Fund's performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market indices and a peer universe compiled by the independent fee consultant using information supplied by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper"). The Board also noted that it has put a process into place of identifying "Focus Funds" (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to their benchmark or a peer group compiled by Lipper), and receives more frequent reporting and information from DIMA regarding such funds, along with DIMA's remedial plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007, the Fund's performance (Class A shares) was in the 4th quartile, 4th quartile and 3rd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has underperformed its benchmark in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board noted the disappointing investment performance of the Fund in recent periods and continued to discuss with senior management of DIMA the factors contributing to such underperformance and actions being taken to improve performance. The Board also observed that the Fund had experienced improved relative performance during the first six months of 2008. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
On the basis of this evaluation and the ongoing review of investment results by the Board, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA historically have been and continue to be satisfactory.
Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's investment management fee schedule, operating expenses, and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Lipper and the independent fee consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund, which include the 0.10% fee paid to DIMA under the Fund's administrative services agreement, were lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007). The Board noted that the Fund's Class A shares' total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees) were expected to be lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007, and analyzing Lipper expense universe Class A expenses less any applicable 12b-1 fees) ("Lipper Universe Expenses"). The Board also reviewed each other share class's total (net) operating expenses relative to the Lipper Universe Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DIMA and certain of its affiliates for comparable mutual funds and considered differences in fund and fee structures between the DWS Funds. The Board also considered how the Fund's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Fund's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DIMA under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs and pre-tax profits realized by DIMA from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of the DWS Investments organization with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board reviewed DIMA's methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by DIMA in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Investments fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund's management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Other Benefits to DIMA and Its Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DIMA and its affiliates, including any fees received by DIMA for administrative services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DIMA for distribution services. The Board also considered benefits to DIMA related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities, along with the incidental public relations benefits to DIMA related to DWS Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS Investments products and services. The Board concluded that management fees were reasonable in light of these fallout benefits.
Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board (including a majority of the Independent Trustees) determined that the continuation of the Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreement.
DWS Capital Growth VIP
The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of your Fund's investment management agreement (the "Agreement") with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA") in September 2008.
In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreement, shareholders should know that:
• At the present time, all but one of your Fund's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
• The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board's Contract Committee, in coordination with the Board's Equity Oversight Committee, reviewed comprehensive materials received from DIMA, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund's performance, fees and expenses, and profitability compiled by the Fund's independent fee consultant. The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund.
• The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel (and, as needed, other advisors) to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by the Fund's independent fee consultant in the course of their review of the Fund's contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations (the "IFC Report").
• In connection with reviewing the Agreement, the Board also reviewed the terms of the Fund's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administrative services agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
• Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Independent Trustees as a group. The Independent Trustees reviewed the Contract Committee's findings and recommendations and presented their recommendations to the full Board.
In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DIMA and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DIMA managed the Fund, and that the Agreement was approved by the Fund's shareholders at a special meeting held in 2006. DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Board believes that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund's Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreements, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, DIMA provides portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DIMA provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel, the resources made available to such personnel, the ability of DIMA to attract and retain high-quality personnel, and the organizational depth and stability of DIMA. The Board reviewed the Fund's performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market indices and a peer universe compiled by the independent fee consultant using information supplied by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper"). The Board also noted that it has put a process into place of identifying "Focus Funds" (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to their benchmark or a peer group compiled by Lipper), and receives more frequent reporting and information from DIMA regarding such funds, along with DIMA's remedial plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007, the Fund's performance (Class A shares) was in the 3rd quartile, 2nd quartile and 2nd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has outperformed its benchmark in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
On the basis of this evaluation and the ongoing review of investment results by the Board, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA historically have been and continue to be satisfactory.
Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's investment management fee schedule, operating expenses, and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Lipper and the independent fee consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund, which include the 0.10% fee paid to DIMA under the Fund's administrative services agreement, were lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007). The Board noted that the Fund's Class A shares' total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees) were expected to be lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007, and analyzing Lipper expense universe Class A expenses less any applicable 12b-1 fees) ("Lipper Universe Expenses"). The Board also reviewed each other share class's total (net) operating expenses relative to the Lipper Universe Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DIMA and certain of its affiliates for comparable mutual funds and considered differences in fund and fee structures between the DWS Funds. The Board also considered how the Fund's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Fund's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DIMA under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs and pre-tax profits realized by DIMA from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of the DWS Investments organization with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board reviewed DIMA's methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by DIMA in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Investments fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund's management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Other Benefits to DIMA and Its Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DIMA and its affiliates, including any fees received by DIMA for administrative services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DIMA for distribution services. The Board also considered benefits to DIMA related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities, along with the incidental public relations benefits to DIMA related to DWS Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS Investments products and services. The Board concluded that management fees were reasonable in light of these fallout benefits.
Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board (including a majority of the Independent Trustees) determined that the continuation of the Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreement.
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of your Fund's investment management agreement (the "Agreement") with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA") in September 2008.
In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreement, shareholders should know that:
• At the present time, all but one of your Fund's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
• The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board's Contract Committee, in coordination with the Board's Equity Oversight Committee, reviewed comprehensive materials received from DIMA, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund's performance, fees and expenses, and profitability compiled by the Fund's independent fee consultant. The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund.
• The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel (and, as needed, other advisors) to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by the Fund's independent fee consultant in the course of their review of the Fund's contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations (the "IFC Report").
• In connection with reviewing the Agreement, the Board also reviewed the terms of the Fund's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administrative services agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
• Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Independent Trustees as a group. The Independent Trustees reviewed the Contract Committee's findings and recommendations and presented their recommendations to the full Board.
In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DIMA and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DIMA managed the Fund, and that the Agreement was approved by the Fund's shareholders at a special meeting held in 2006. DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Board believes that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund's Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreement, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, DIMA provides portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DIMA provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel, the resources made available to such personnel, the ability of DIMA to attract and retain high-quality personnel, and the organizational depth and stability of DIMA. The Board reviewed the Fund's performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market indices and a peer universe compiled by the independent fee consultant using information supplied by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper"). The Board also noted that it has put a process into place of identifying "Focus Funds" (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to their benchmark or a peer group compiled by Lipper), and receives more frequent reporting and information from DIMA regarding such funds, along with DIMA's remedial plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007, the Fund's performance (Class A shares) was in the 3rd quartile, 1st quartile and 1st quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has outperformed its benchmark in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
On the basis of this evaluation and the ongoing review of investment results by the Board, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA historically have been and continue to be satisfactory.
Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's investment management fee schedule, operating expenses, and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Lipper and the independent fee consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund, which include the 0.10% fee paid to DIMA under the Fund's administrative services agreement, were higher than the median (4th quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007). The Board noted that the Fund's Class A shares' total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees) were expected to be higher than the median (3rd quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007, and analyzing Lipper expense universe Class A expenses less any applicable 12b-1 fees) ("Lipper Universe Expenses"). The Board also reviewed each other share class's total (net) operating expenses relative to the Lipper Universe Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DIMA and certain of its affiliates for comparable mutual funds and considered differences in fund and fee structures between the DWS Funds. The Board also considered how the Fund's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Fund's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DIMA under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs and pre-tax profits realized by DIMA from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of the DWS Investments organization with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board reviewed DIMA's methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by DIMA in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Investments fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund's management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Other Benefits to DIMA and Its Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DIMA and its affiliates, including any fees received by DIMA for administrative services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DIMA for distribution services. The Board also considered benefits to DIMA related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities, along with the incidental public relations benefits to DIMA related to DWS Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS Investments products and services. The Board concluded that management fees were reasonable in light of these fallout benefits.
Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board (including a majority of the Independent Trustees) determined that the continuation of the Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreement.
DWS International VIP
The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of your Fund's investment management agreement (the "Agreement") with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA") in September 2008.
In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreement, shareholders should know that:
• At the present time, all but one of your Fund's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
• The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board's Contract Committee, in coordination with the Board's Equity Oversight Committee, reviewed comprehensive materials received from DIMA, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund's performance, fees and expenses, and profitability compiled by the Fund's independent fee consultant. The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund.
• The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel (and, as needed, other advisors) to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by the Fund's independent fee consultant in the course of their review of the Fund's contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations (the "IFC Report").
• In connection with reviewing the Agreement, the Board also reviewed the terms of the Fund's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administrative services agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
• Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Independent Trustees as a group. The Independent Trustees reviewed the Contract Committee's findings and recommendations and presented their recommendations to the full Board.
In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DIMA and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DIMA managed the Fund, and that the Agreement was approved by the Fund's shareholders at a special meeting held in 2006. DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Board believes that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund's Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreement, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, DIMA provides portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DIMA provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel, the resources made available to such personnel, the ability of DIMA to attract and retain high-quality personnel, and the organizational depth and stability of DIMA. The Board reviewed the Fund's performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market indices and a peer universe compiled by the independent fee consultant using information supplied by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper"). The Board also noted that it has put a process into place of identifying "Focus Funds" (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to their benchmark or a peer group compiled by Lipper), and receives more frequent reporting and information from DIMA regarding such funds, along with DIMA's remedial plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007, the Fund's performance (Class A shares) was in the 2nd quartile, 1st quartile and 3rd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has outperformed its benchmark in the one- and three-year periods ended December 31, 2007 and has underperformed its benchmark in the five-year period ended December 31, 2007. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
On the basis of this evaluation and the ongoing review of investment results by the Board, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA historically have been and continue to be satisfactory.
Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's investment management fee schedule, operating expenses, and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Lipper and the independent fee consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund, which include the 0.10% fee paid to DIMA under the Fund's administrative services agreement, were higher than the median (4th quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007). The Board noted that the Fund's Class A shares' total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees) were expected to be higher than the median (3rd quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007, and analyzing Lipper expense universe Class A expenses less any applicable 12b-1 fees) ("Lipper Universe Expenses"). The Board also reviewed each other share class's total (net) operating expenses relative to the Lipper Universe Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DIMA and certain of its affiliates for comparable mutual funds and considered differences in fund and fee structures between the DWS Funds. The Board also considered how the Fund's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Fund's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DIMA under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs and pre-tax profits realized by DIMA from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of the DWS Investments organization with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board reviewed DIMA's methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by DIMA in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Investments fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund's management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Other Benefits to DIMA and Its Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DIMA and its affiliates, including any fees received by DIMA for administrative services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DIMA for distribution services. The Board also considered benefits to DIMA related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities, along with the incidental public relations benefits to DIMA related to DWS Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS Investments products and services. The Board concluded that management fees were reasonable in light of these fallout benefits.
Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board (including a majority of the Independent Trustees) determined that the continuation of the Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreement.
DWS Health Care VIP
The Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of your Fund's investment management agreement (the "Agreement") with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA") in September 2008.
In terms of the process that the Board followed prior to approving the Agreement, shareholders should know that:
• At the present time, all but one of your Fund's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
• The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. Over the course of several months, the Board's Contract Committee, in coordination with the Board's Equity, reviewed comprehensive materials received from DIMA, independent third parties and independent counsel. These materials included an analysis of the Fund's performance, fees and expenses, and profitability compiled by the Fund's independent fee consultant. The Board also received extensive information throughout the year regarding performance of the Fund.
• The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel (and, as needed, other advisors) to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by the Fund's independent fee consultant in the course of their review of the Fund's contractual arrangements and considered a comprehensive report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations (the "IFC Report").
• In connection with reviewing the Agreement, the Board also reviewed the terms of the Fund's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administrative services agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
• Based on its evaluation of the information provided, the Contract Committee presented its findings and recommendations to the Independent Trustees as a group. The Independent Trustees reviewed the Contract Committee's findings and recommendations and presented their recommendations to the full Board.
In connection with the contract review process, the Contract Committee and the Board considered the factors discussed below, among others. The Board also considered that DIMA and its predecessors have managed the Fund since its inception, and the Board believes that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interests of the Fund. The Board considered, generally, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in the Fund knowing that DIMA managed the Fund, and that the Agreement was approved by the Fund's shareholders at a special meeting held in 2006. DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Board believes that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
While shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, the Fund's Board considers these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
Nature, Quality and Extent of Services. The Board considered the terms of the Agreement, including the scope of advisory services provided under the Agreement. The Board noted that, under the Agreement, DIMA provides portfolio management services to the Fund and that, pursuant to a separate administrative services agreement, DIMA provides administrative services to the Fund. The Board considered the experience and skills of senior management and investment personnel, the resources made available to such personnel, the ability of DIMA to attract and retain high-quality personnel, and the organizational depth and stability of DIMA. The Board reviewed the Fund's performance over short-term and long-term periods and compared those returns to various agreed-upon performance measures, including market indices and a peer universe compiled by the independent fee consultant using information supplied by Lipper Inc. ("Lipper"). The Board also noted that it has put a process into place of identifying "Focus Funds" (e.g., funds performing poorly relative to their benchmark or a peer group compiled by Lipper), and receives more frequent reporting and information from DIMA regarding such funds, along with DIMA's remedial plans to address underperformance. The Board believes this process is an effective manner of identifying and addressing underperforming funds. Based on the information provided, the Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007, the Fund's performance (Class A shares) was in the 2nd quartile, 3rd quartile and 3rd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe (the 1st quartile being the best performers and the 4th quartile being the worst performers). The Board also observed that the Fund has outperformed its benchmark in the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
On the basis of this evaluation and the ongoing review of investment results by the Board, the Board concluded that the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA historically have been and continue to be satisfactory.
Fees and Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's investment management fee schedule, operating expenses, and total expense ratios, and comparative information provided by Lipper and the independent fee consultant regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds (1st quartile being the most favorable and 4th quartile being the least favorable). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Board noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Fund, which include the 0.10% fee paid to DIMA under the Fund's administrative services agreement, were lower than the median (2nd quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007). The Board noted that the Fund's Class A shares' total (net) operating expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees) were expected to be lower than the median (2nd quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2007, and analyzing Lipper expense universe Class A expenses less any applicable 12b-1 fees) ("Lipper Universe Expenses"). The Board also reviewed each other share class's total (net) operating expenses relative to the Lipper Universe Expenses. The Board considered the Fund's management fee rate as compared to fees charged by DIMA and certain of its affiliates for comparable mutual funds and considered differences in fund and fee structures between the DWS Funds. The Board also considered how the Fund's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitation agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Fund's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
On the basis of the information provided, the Board concluded that management fees were reasonable and appropriate in light of the nature, quality and extent of services provided by DIMA.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by DIMA under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs and pre-tax profits realized by DIMA from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of the DWS Investments organization with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board reviewed DIMA's methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by DIMA in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Investments fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund's management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Other Benefits to DIMA and Its Affiliates. The Board also considered the character and amount of other incidental benefits received by DIMA and its affiliates, including any fees received by DIMA for administrative services provided to the Fund and any fees received by an affiliate of DIMA for distribution services. The Board also considered benefits to DIMA related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, including allocating brokerage to pay for research generated by parties other than the executing broker dealers, which pertain primarily to funds investing in equity securities, along with the incidental public relations benefits to DIMA related to DWS Funds advertising and cross-selling opportunities among DWS Investments products and services. The Board concluded that management fees were reasonable in light of these fallout benefits.
Compliance. The Board considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Based on all of the information considered and the conclusions reached, the Board (including a majority of the Independent Trustees) determined that the continuation of the Agreement is in the best interests of the Fund. In making this determination the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, certain of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the Agreement.
Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant
October 24, 2008
Pursuant to an Order entered into by Deutsche Investment Management Americas and affiliates (collectively, "DeAM") with the Attorney General of New York, I, Thomas H. Mack, have been appointed the Independent Fee Consultant for the DWS Funds (formerly the DWS Scudder Funds). My duties include preparing an annual written evaluation of the management fees DeAM charges the Funds, considering among other factors the management fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services, management fees DeAM charges other clients for like services, DeAM's costs of supplying services under the management agreements and related profit margins, possible economies of scale if a Fund grows larger, and the nature and quality of DeAM's services, including fund performance. This report summarizes my evaluation for 2008, including my qualifications, the evaluation process for each of the DWS Funds, consideration of certain complex-level factors, and my conclusions. I served in substantially the same capacity in 2007.
Qualifications
For more than 35 years I have served in various professional capacities within the investment management business. I have held investment analysis and advisory positions, including securities analyst, portfolio strategist and director of investment policy with a large investment firm. I have also performed business management functions, including business development, financial management and marketing research and analysis.
Since 1991, I have been an independent consultant within the asset management industry. I have provided services to over 125 client organizations, including investment managers, mutual fund boards, product distributors and related organizations. Over the past ten years I have completed a number of assignments for mutual fund boards, specifically including assisting boards with management contract renewal.
I hold a Master of Business Administration degree, with highest honors, from Harvard University and Master of Science and Bachelor of Science (highest honors) degrees from the University of California at Berkeley. I am an independent director and audit committee financial expert for two closed-end mutual funds, serve on the board of directors of a private market research company, and have served in various leadership and financial oversight capacities with non-profit organizations.
Evaluation of Fees for each DWS Fund
My work focused primarily on evaluating, fund-by-fund, the fees charged to each of the 129 Fund portfolios in the DWS Fund family. For each Fund, I considered each of the key factors mentioned above, as well as any other relevant information. In doing so I worked closely with the Funds' Independent Directors in their annual contract renewal process, as well as in their approval of contracts for several new funds (documented separately).
In evaluating each Fund's fees, I reviewed comprehensive materials provided by or on behalf of DeAM, including expense information prepared by Lipper Analytical, comparative performance information, profitability data, manager histories, and other materials. I also accessed certain additional information from the Lipper, Strategic Insight, and Morningstar databases and drew on my industry knowledge and experience.
To facilitate evaluating this considerable body of information, I prepared for each Fund a document summarizing the key data elements in each area as well as additional analytics discussed below. This made it possible to consider each key data element in the context of the others.
In the course of contract renewal, DeAM agreed to implement a number of fee and expense adjustments requested by the Independent Directors which will favorably impact future fees and expenses, and my evaluation includes the effects of these changes.
Fees and Expenses Compared with Other Funds
The competitive fee and expense evaluation for each fund focused on two primary comparisons:
The Fund's contractual management fee (the advisory fee plus the administration fee where applicable) compared with those of a group of typically 12-15 funds in the same Lipper investment category (e.g. Large Capitalization Growth) having similar distribution arrangements and being of similar size.
The Fund's total expenses compared with a broader universe of funds from the same Lipper investment category and having similar distribution arrangements.
These two comparisons provide a view of not only the level of the fee compared with funds of similar scale but also the total expense the Fund bears for all the services it receives, in comparison with the investment choices available in the Fund's investment category and distribution channel. The principal figure-of-merit used in these comparisons was the subject Fund's percentile ranking against peers.
DeAM's Fees for Similar Services to Others
DeAM provided management fee schedules for all of its US domiciled fund and non-fund investment management accounts in any of the investment categories where there is a DWS Fund. These similar products included the other DWS Funds, non-fund pooled accounts, institutional accounts and sub-advisory accounts. Using this information, I calculated for each Fund the fee that would be charged to each similar product, at the subject Fund's asset level.
Evaluating information regarding non-fund products is difficult because there are varying levels of services required for different types of accounts, with mutual funds generally requiring considerably more regulatory and administrative types of service as well as having more frequent cash flows than other types of accounts. Also, while mutual fund fees for similar fund products can be expected to be similar, there will be some differences due to different pricing conditions in different distribution channels (e.g. retail funds versus those used in variable insurance products), differences in underlying investment processes and other factors.
Costs and Profit Margins
DeAM provided a detailed profitability analysis for each Fund. After making some adjustments so that the presentation would be more comparable to the available industry figures, I reviewed profit margins from investment management alone, from investment management plus other fund services (excluding distribution) provided to the Funds by DeAM (principally shareholder services), and DeAM profits from all sources, including distribution. A later section comments on overall profitability.
Economies of Scale
Economies of scale — an expected decline in management cost per dollar of fund assets as fund assets grow — are very rarely quantified and documented because of inherent difficulties in collecting and analyzing relevant data. However, in virtually every investment category that I reviewed, larger funds tend to have lower fees and lower total expenses than smaller funds. To see how each DWS Fund compares with this industry observation, I reviewed:
The trend in Fund assets over the last five years and the accompanying trend in total expenses. This shows if the Fund has grown and, if so, whether total expense (management fees as well as other expenses) have declined as a percent of assets.
Whether the Fund has break-points in its management fee schedule, the extent of the fee reduction built into the schedule and the asset levels where the breaks take effect, and in the case of a sub-advised Fund how the Fund's break-points compare with those of the sub-advisory fee schedule.
How the Fund's contractual fee schedule compares with trends in the industry data. To accomplish this, I constructed a chart showing how actual latest-fiscal-year contractual fees of the Fund and of other similar funds relate to average fund assets, with the subject Fund's contractual fee schedule superimposed.
Quality of Service — Performance
The quality-of-service evaluation focused on investment performance, which is the principal result of the investment management service. Each Fund's performance was reviewed over the past 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, as applicable, and compared with that of other funds in the same investment category and with a suitable market index.
In addition, I calculated and reviewed risk-adjusted returns relative to an index of similar mutual funds' returns and a suitable market index. The risk-adjusted returns analysis provides a way of determining the extent to which the Fund's return comparisons are mainly the product of investment value-added (or lack thereof) or alternatively taking considerably more or less risk than is typical in its investment category.
I also received and considered the history of portfolio manager changes for each Fund, as this provided an important context for evaluating the performance results.
Complex-Level Considerations
While this evaluation was conducted mainly at the individual fund level, there are some issues relating to the reasonableness of fees that can alternatively be considered across the whole fund complex:
I reviewed DeAM's profitability analysis for all DWS Funds, with a view toward determining if the allocation procedures used were reasonable and how profit levels compared with public data for other investment managers.
I considered whether DeAM and affiliates receive any significant ancillary or "fall-out" benefits that should be considered in interpreting the direct profitability results. These would be situations where serving as the investment manager of the Funds is beneficial to another part of the Deutsche Bank organization.
I considered how aggregated DWS Fund expenses had varied over the years, by asset class and in the context of trends in asset levels.
I reviewed the structure of the DeAM organization, trends in staffing levels, and information on compensation of investment management and other professionals compared with industry data.
Findings
Based on the process and analysis discussed above, which included reviewing a wide range of information from management and external data sources and considering among other factors the fees DeAM charges other clients, the fees charged by other fund managers, DeAM's costs and profits associated with managing the Funds, economies of scale, possible fall-out benefits, and the nature and quality of services provided, in my opinion the management fees charged the DWS Funds are reasonable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e28d/8e28de038ed5c7c0dc08b91a03370e6fa958ed2e" alt="dvs1_sigmack1"
Thomas H. Mack
Summary of Administrative Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant
September 29, 2008
Pursuant to an Order entered into by Deutsche Asset Management (DeAM) with the Attorney General of New York, I, Thomas H. Mack, have been appointed the Independent Fee Consultant for the DWS Funds and have as part of my duties evaluated the reasonableness of the proposed management fees to be charged by DeAM to the DWS Funds, taking onto account a proposal to pass through to the funds certain fund accounting-related charges in connection with new regulatory requirements. My evaluation considered the following:
• While the proposal would alter the services to be provided under the Administration Agreement, which I consider to be part of fund management under the Order, it is my opinion that the change in services is slight and that the scope of prospective services under the combination of the Advisory and Administration Agreements continues to be comparable with those typically provided to competitive funds under their management agreements.
• While the proposal would increase fund expenses, according to a pro forma analysis performed by management, the prospective effect is less than .01% for all but seven of the DeAM Funds' 438 active share classes, and in all cases the effect is less than .03% and overall expenses would remain reasonable in my opinion.
Based on the foregoing considerations, in my opinion the fees and expenses for all of the DWS Funds will remain reasonable if the Directors adopt this proposal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32bb7/32bb76a65cfc271a3364da5be996387fd389daad" alt="dvs1_sigmack0"
Thomas H. Mack
Board Members and Officers
The following table presents certain information regarding the Board Members and Officers of the Trust as of December 31, 2008. Each Board Member's year of birth is set forth in parentheses after his or her name. Unless otherwise noted, (i) each Board Member has engaged in the principal occupation(s) noted in the table for at least the most recent five years, although not necessarily in the same capacity; and (ii) the address of each Independent Board Member is c/o Dawn-Marie Driscoll, PO Box 100176, Cape Coral, FL 33904. Except as otherwise noted below, the term of office for each Board Member is until the election and qualification of a successor, or until such Board Member sooner dies, resigns, is removed or as otherwise provided in the governing documents of the fund. Because the fund does not hold an annual meeting of shareholders, each Board Member will hold office for an indeterminate period. The Board Members may also serve in similar capacities with other funds in the fund complex. The Length of Time Served represents the year in which the Board Member joined the board of one or more DWS funds now overseen by the Board.
Independent Board Members |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served1 | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years | Number of Funds in DWS Fund Complex Overseen |
Paul K. Freeman (1950) Chairperson since 20092 Board Member since 1993
| Consultant, World Bank/Inter-American Development Bank; Governing Council of the Independent Directors Council (governance, executive committees); formerly, Project Leader, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (1998-2001); Chief Executive Officer, The Eric Group, Inc. (environmental insurance) (1986-1998)
| 134 |
Dawn-Marie Driscoll (1946) Board Member since 1987
| President, Driscoll Associates (consulting firm); Executive Fellow, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University; formerly, Partner, Palmer & Dodge (1988-1990); Vice President of Corporate Affairs and General Counsel, Filene's (1978-1988). Directorships: Trustee of 20 open-end mutual funds managed by Sun Capital Advisers, Inc. (since 2007); Director of ICI Mutual Insurance Company (since 2007); Advisory Board, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley University; Trustee, Southwest Florida Community Foundation (charitable organization). Former Directorships: Investment Company Institute (audit, executive, nominating committees) and Independent Directors Council (governance, executive committees)
| 134 |
John W. Ballantine (1946) Board Member since 1999
| Retired; formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Management Officer, First Chicago NBD Corporation/The First National Bank of Chicago (1996-1998); Executive Vice President and Head of International Banking (1995-1996). Directorships: Healthways, Inc. (provider of disease and care management services); Portland General Electric (utility company); Stockwell Capital Investments PLC (private equity). Former Directorships: First Oak Brook Bancshares, Inc. and Oak Brook Bank
| 134 |
Henry P. Becton, Jr. (1943) Board Member since 1990
| Vice Chair, WGBH Educational Foundation. Directorships: Association of Public Television Stations; Becton Dickinson and Company3 (medical technology company); Belo Corporation3 (media company); Boston Museum of Science; Public Radio International; PRX, The Public Radio Exchange; The PBS Foundation. Former Directorships: American Public Television; Concord Academy; New England Aquarium; Mass. Corporation for Educational Telecommunications; Committee for Economic Development; Public Broadcasting Service
| 134 |
Keith R. Fox (1954) Board Member since 1996
| Managing General Partner, Exeter Capital Partners (a series of private investment funds). Directorships: Progressive Holding Corporation (kitchen goods importer and distributor); Box Top Media Inc. (advertising); The Kennel Shop (retailer)
| 134 |
Kenneth C. Froewiss (1945) Board Member since 2001
| Clinical Professor of Finance, NYU Stern School of Business (1997-present); Member, Finance Committee, Association for Asian Studies (2002-present); Director, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group (US) (2004-present); prior thereto, Managing Director, J.P. Morgan (investment banking firm) (until 1996)
| 134 |
Richard J. Herring (1946) Board Member since 1990
| Jacob Safra Professor of International Banking and Professor, Finance Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (since July 1972); Co-Director, Wharton Financial Institutions Center (since July 2000); Director, Japan Equity Fund, Inc. (since September 2007), Thai Capital Fund, Inc. (since September 2007), Singapore Fund, Inc. (since September 2007). Formerly, Vice Dean and Director, Wharton Undergraduate Division (July 1995-June 2000); Director, Lauder Institute of International Management Studies (July 2000-June 2006)
| 134 |
William McClayton (1944) Board Member since 2004
| Managing Director, Diamond Management & Technology Consultants, Inc. (global management consulting firm) (2001-present); Directorship: Board of Managers, YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago; formerly: Senior Partner, Arthur Andersen LLP (accounting) (1966-2001); Trustee, Ravinia Festival
| 134 |
Rebecca W. Rimel (1951) Board Member since 1995
| President and Chief Executive Officer, The Pew Charitable Trusts (charitable organization) (1994 to present); Trustee, Thomas Jefferson Foundation (charitable organization) (1994 to present); Trustee, Executive Committee, Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce (2001-2007); Trustee, Pro Publica (2007-present) (charitable organization). Formerly, Executive Vice President, The Glenmede Trust Company (investment trust and wealth management) (1983-2004); Board Member, Investor Education (charitable organization) (2004-2005); Director, Viasys Health Care3 (January 2007-June 2007)
| 134 |
William N. Searcy, Jr. (1946) Board Member since 1993
| Private investor since October 2003; Trustee of 20 open-end mutual funds managed by Sun Capital Advisers, Inc. (since October 1998). Formerly, Pension & Savings Trust Officer, Sprint Corporation3 (telecommunications) (November 1989-September 2003)
| 134 |
Jean Gleason Stromberg (1943) Board Member since 1997
| Retired. Formerly, Consultant (1997-2001); Director, US Government Accountability Office (1996-1997); Partner, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. (law firm) (1978-1996). Directorships: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Business Leadership Council, Wellesley College. Former Directorships: Service Source, Inc., Mutual Fund Directors Forum (2002-2004), American Bar Retirement Association (funding vehicle for retirement plans) (1987-1990 and 1994-1996)
| 134 |
Robert H. Wadsworth (1940) Board Member since 1999
| President, Robert H. Wadsworth & Associates, Inc. (consulting firm) (1983 to present); Director, The Phoenix Boys Choir Association
| 137 |
Interested Board Member |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served1 | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen |
Axel Schwarzer4 (1958) Board Member since 2006
| Managing Director5, Deutsche Asset Management; Head of Deutsche Asset Management Americas; CEO of DWS Investments; formerly, board member of DWS Investments, Germany (1999-2005); formerly, Head of Sales and Product Management for the Retail and Private Banking Division of Deutsche Bank in Germany (1997-1999); formerly, various strategic and operational positions for Deutsche Bank Germany Retail and Private Banking Division in the field of investment funds, tax driven instruments and asset management for corporates (1989-1996)
| 134 |
Officers6 |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served7 | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years and Other Directorships Held |
Michael G. Clark8 (1965) President, 2006-present
| Managing Director5, Deutsche Asset Management (2006-present); President of DWS family of funds; Director, ICI Mutual Insurance Company (since October 2007); formerly, Director of Fund Board Relations (2004-2006) and Director of Product Development (2000-2004), Merrill Lynch Investment Managers; Senior Vice President Operations, Merrill Lynch Asset Management (1999-2000)
|
John Millette9 (1962) Vice President and Secretary, 1999-present
| Director5, Deutsche Asset Management
|
Paul H. Schubert8 (1963) Chief Financial Officer, 2004-present Treasurer, 2005-present
| Managing Director5, Deutsche Asset Management (since July 2004); formerly, Executive Director, Head of Mutual Fund Services and Treasurer for UBS Family of Funds (1998-2004); Vice President and Director of Mutual Fund Finance at UBS Global Asset Management (1994-1998)
|
Caroline Pearson9 (1962) Assistant Secretary, 1997-present
| Managing Director5, Deutsche Asset Management
|
Rita Rubin10 (1970) Assistant Secretary, 2009-present
| Vice President and Counsel, Deutsche Asset Management (since October 2007); formerly, Vice President, Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2004-2007); Attorney, Shearman & Sterling LLP (2004); Vice President and Associate General Counsel, UBS Global Asset Management (2001-2004)
|
Paul Antosca9 (1957) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present
| Director5, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2006); Vice President, The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) (1990-2006)
|
Jack Clark9 (1967) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present
| Director5, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2007); formerly, Vice President, State Street Corporation (2002-2007)
|
Diane Kenneally9 (1966) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present
| Director5, Deutsche Asset Management
|
Jason Vazquez10 (1972) Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, 2007-present
| Vice President, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2006); formerly, AML Operations Manager for Bear Stearns (2004-2006), Supervising Compliance Principal and Operations Manager for AXA Financial (1999-2004)
|
Robert Kloby10 (1962) Chief Compliance Officer, 2006-present
| Managing Director5, Deutsche Asset Management (2004-present); formerly, Chief Compliance Officer/Chief Risk Officer, Robeco USA (2000-2004); Vice President, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (1988-2000); E.F. Hutton and Company (1984-1988)
|
J. Christopher Jackson10 (1951) Chief Legal Officer, 2006-present
| Director5, Deutsche Asset Management (2006-present); formerly, Director, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, Hansberger Global Investors, Inc. (1996-2006); Director, National Society of Compliance Professionals (2002-2005) (2006-2009)
|
1 The length of time served represents the year in which the Board Member joined the board of one or more DWS funds currently overseen by the Board.2 Mr. Freeman assumed the Chairperson role as of January 1, 2009. Prior to that Ms. Driscoll served as Chairperson of certain DWS funds since 2004.3 A publicly held company with securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.4 The mailing address of Axel Schwarzer is c/o Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc., 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154. Mr. Schwarzer is an interested Board Member by virtue of his positions with Deutsche Asset Management. As an interested person, Mr. Schwarzer receives no compensation from the fund.5 Executive title, not a board directorship.6 As a result of their respective positions held with the Advisor, these individuals are considered "interested persons" of the Advisor within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Interested persons receive no compensation from the fund.7 The length of time served represents the year in which the officer was first elected in such capacity for one or more DWS funds.8 Address: 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154.9 Address: One Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108.10 Address: 280 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10017.The fund's Statement of Additional Information ("SAI") includes additional information about the Board Members. The SAI is available, without charge, upon request. If you would like to request a copy of the SAI, you may do so by calling the following toll-free number: (800) 621-1048.
Notes
DWS Investments is part of Deutsche Bank's Asset Management division and, within the US, represents the retail asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. and DWS Trust Company.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. The managers' views are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation.
This information must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
Portfolio changes should not be considered recommendations for action by individual investors.
DWS Investments Distributors, Inc.
222 South Riverside Plaza
Chicago, IL 60606
(800) 778-1482
VS1-2 (R-9041-1 2/09)
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS |
| |
| As of the end of the period, December 31, 2008, DWS Variable Series I has a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. There have been no amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the code of ethics during the period covered by this report that would require disclosure under Item 2. A copy of the code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. |
| |
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT |
| |
| The Funds’ audit committee is comprised solely of trustees who are “independent” (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the “Regulations”)). The Funds’ Board of Trustees has determined that there are several “audit committee financial experts” (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) serving on the Funds’ audit committee including Mr. William McClayton, the chair of the Funds’ audit committee. The SEC has stated that an audit committee financial expert is not an “expert” for any purpose, including for purposes of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 of Form N-CSR does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification. |
| |
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
| |
DWS VARIABLE SERIES I
FORM N-CSR DISCLOSURE RE: AUDIT FEES
The following table shows the amount of fees that PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (“PWC”), the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm, billed to the Fund during the Fund’s last two fiscal years. The Audit Committee approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that PWC provided to the Fund.
The Audit Committee has delegated certain pre-approval responsibilities to its Chairman (or, in his absence, any other member of the Audit Committee).
Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Fund
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | Audit Fees Billed to Fund | Audit-Related Fees Billed to Fund | Tax Fees Billed to Fund | All Other Fees Billed to Fund |
2008 | $195,675 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
2007 | $190,775 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers
The following table shows the amount of fees billed by PWC to Deutsche Investment Management Americas, Inc. (“DeIM” or the “Adviser”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with DeIM (“Control Affiliate”) that provides ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Fund Service Provider”), for engagements directly related to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting, during the Fund’s last two fiscal years.
Fiscal Year December 31, | Audit-Related Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers | Tax Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers | All Other Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers |
2008 | $0 | $19,000 | $0 |
2007 | $58,500 | $25,000 | $0 |
The “Audit-Related Fees” were billed for services in connection with the agreed-upon procedures related to fund mergers and the above “Tax Fees” were billed in connection with tax consultation and agreed-upon procedures.
Non-Audit Services
The following table shows the amount of fees that PWC billed during the Fund’s last two fiscal years for non-audit services. The Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services that PWC provided to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider that related directly to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting. The Audit Committee requested and received information from PWC about any non-audit services that PWC rendered during the Fund’s last fiscal year to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider. The Committee considered this information in evaluating PWC’s independence.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | Total Non-Audit Fees Billed to Fund (A) | Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (engagements related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund) (B) | Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (all other engagements) (C) | Total of (A), (B)
and (C) |
2008 | $0 | $19,000 | $0 | $19,000 |
2007 | $0 | $25,000 | $600,000 | $625,000 |
All other engagement fees were billed for services provided by PWC for services related to consulting on an IT project.
***
PwC advised the Fund's Audit Committee that PwC has identified two matters that it determined to be inconsistent with the SEC's auditor independence rules. In the first instance, an employee of PwC had power of attorney over an account which included DWS funds. The employee did not perform any audit services for the DWS Funds, but did work on a non audit project for Deutsche Bank AG. In the second instance, an employee of PwC served as a nominee shareholder (effectively equivalent to a Trustee) of various companies/trusts since 2001. Some of these companies held shares of Aberdeen, a sub advisor to certain DWS Funds, and of certain funds sponsored by subsidiaries of Deutsche Bank AG. The trustee relationship has ceased. PwC informed the Audit Committee that these matters could have constituted an investment in an affiliate of an audit client in violation of the Rule 2-01(c)(1) of Regulation S-X. PwC advised the Audit Committee that PwC believes its independence had not been impacted as it related to the audits of the Fund. In reaching this conclusion, PwC noted that during the time of its audit, the engagement team was not aware of the investment and that PwC does not believe these situations affected PwC's ability to act objectively and impartially and to issue a report on financial statements as the funds' independent auditor.
| |
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS |
| |
| Not Applicable |
| |
ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
| |
| Not Applicable |
| |
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
| |
| Not applicable. |
| |
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
| |
| Not applicable. |
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS |
| |
| Not Applicable. |
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
| |
| The primary function of the Nominating and Governance Committee is to identify and recommend individuals for membership on the Board and oversee the administration of the Board Governance Guidelines. Shareholders may recommend candidates for Board positions by forwarding their correspondence by U.S. mail or courier service to Chairman of the Board, P.O. Box 100176, Cape Coral, FL 33910. |
| |
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
| |
| (a) The Chief Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on the evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report. |
| |
| (b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. |
| |
ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS |
| |
| (a)(1) Code of Ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CODE ETH. |
| |
| (a)(2) Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) is filed and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT. |
| |
| (b) Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) is furnished and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT. |
Form N-CSR Item F
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant: | DWS Variable Series I |
President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Registrant: | DWS Variable Series I |
President
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Date: February 20, 2009