UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
-------- |
FORM N-CSR |
-------- |
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT FILE NUMBER 811-4325 |
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
40 Wall Street |
New York, NY 10005 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
Joseph I. Benedek |
First Investors Management Company, Inc. |
Raritan Plaza I |
Edison, NJ 08837-3620 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: |
1-212-858-8000 |
DATE OF FISCAL YEAR END: DECEMBER 31 |
DATE OF REPORTING PERIOD: DECEMBER 31, 2014 |
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders | |
The annual report to stockholders follows |
FOREWORD |
This report is for the information of the shareholders of the Funds. It is the policy of each Fund described in this report to mail only one copy of a Fund’s prospectus, annual report, semi-annual report and proxy statements to all shareholders who share the same mailing address and share the same last name and have invested in a Fund covered by the same document. You are deemed to consent to this policy unless you specifically revoke this policy and request that separate copies of such documents be mailed to you. In such case, you will begin to receive your own copies within 30 days after our receipt of the revocation. You may request that separate copies of these disclosure documents be mailed to you by writing to us at: Administrative Data Management Corp., Raritan Plaza I, Edison, NJ 08837-3620 or calling us at 1-800-423-4026.
The views expressed in the portfolio manager letters reflect those views of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period covered. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and we disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice.
You may obtain a free prospectus for any of the Funds by contacting your representative, calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at the following address: First Investors Corporation, 40 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005, or by visiting our website at www.firstinvestors.com. You should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a Fund carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund, and should be read carefully before investing.
An investment in a Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency. Although the Cash Management Fund seeks to preserve a net asset value at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in it, just as it is possible to lose money by investing in any of the other Funds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
A Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) for any of the Funds may also be obtained, without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at our address or by visiting our website listed above. The SAI contains more detailed information about the Funds, including information about their Trustees.
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Life Cash Management Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 0.0%. The Fund maintained a $1.00 net asset value per share throughout the year.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy grew at approximately 2.5% during 2014, with growth accelerating in the second half of the year. Of note, the unemployment rate fell from 6.7% to 5.6%, its lowest level since 2008, as the economy created the most jobs in fifteen years. This good news was tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate (i.e., the percentage of the population participating in the labor force) and anemic wage growth. Inflation was subdued with consumer prices increasing only 0.8%, compared to 1.5% in 2013, in part due to the decline in energy prices during the fourth quarter.
The improvement in the economy and labor market allowed the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) to conclude its bond buying program — part of its effort to stimulate growth by lowering interest rates — in October. As well, the Fed remained on course to begin raising the federal funds rate in the second half of 2015, although low inflation (below the Fed’s 2% target) and international developments could delay rate hikes.
Long-term U.S. interest rates moved sharply lower throughout the review period, despite a strong consensus at the beginning of the year that rates would continue to rise. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors: slower than expected global growth (especially in Europe), very low foreign interest rates, geopolitical events (e.g., Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS, Ebola) that supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, investors’ belief that the upcoming Fed tightening cycle would be more limited than in the past, and deflationary fears which were exacerbated by the collapse in oil prices. For the year, the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield fell from 3.03%, a two-and-a-half year high, to 2.17%.
The broad U.S. bond market returned 6.3% during the review period, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. In particular, long-term bonds had very strong returns as interest rates fell and bond prices rose (interest rates, or yields, and bond prices have an inverse relationship; bond prices rise as interest rates fall). Notably, Treasury securities with maturities longer than ten years gained over 24%.
Returns varied by sector. Investment-grade corporate bonds gained 7.5% as the benefit of lower interest rates offset the negative impact of wider spreads. Mortgage-backed securities and the broad Treasury market returned 6.1% and 6%, respectively. High yield bonds lagged the broad bond market, gaining 2.5% as spreads widened. Non-U.S. government bonds also underperformed the broad market, returning 1.1%, as the substantial appreciation of the U.S. Dollar offset gains from lower interest rates. Money market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very easy monetary policy.
1 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
Review of Money Markets
Yields on money market funds and the instruments that they invest in have remained at record lows, essentially where they have been for the last few years. The Federal Reserve has had an extremely accommodative interest rate policy since late 2008 and has illustrated a willingness to maintain extraordinarily low short-term interest rates until economic conditions improve. While market expectations have varied on when this may occur, the consensus is that the current policy will remain through at least the middle of 2015. Despite the very low returns that money market funds currently offer, they remain an important part of many investment strategies, as evidenced by the approximately $2.5 trillion dollars invested in the category industrywide.
On July 23, 2014, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted amendments to certain rules under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that govern money market funds. There is a transition period extending until October 2016 for the most significant changes, with shorter transition periods for other changes. These changes will impact all SEC-registered money market funds, including the Fund, although they will impact different types of funds in different ways. First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Fund’s investment adviser, is analyzing the impact of these changes and we will communicate to shareholders as the Fund transitions into compliance with the new laws.
FIMCO expects the yield to shareholders will remain near zero for the foreseeable future based on the outlook for short-term interest rates. To avoid a negative yield to its shareholders, FIMCO has absorbed expenses to the Fund and has waived its management fee during the period.
There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to maintain a stable net-asset value of $1.00 per share. Money market mutual funds are neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
2 |
Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
As a mutual fund shareholder, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, and (2) ongoing costs, including advisory fees and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 in each Fund at the beginning of the period, July 1, 2014, and held for the entire six-month period ended December 31, 2014. The calculations assume that no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
Actual Expense Example:
These amounts help you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the Fund’s actual return, and the “Expenses Paid During Period” shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid during the period.
To estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period simply divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number given for your Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period”.
Hypothetical Expense Example:
These amounts provide information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs. Therefore, the hypothetical expense example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
3 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $0.40 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,024.81 | $0.41 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .08%, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the period | |
are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
4 |
Portfolio of Investments
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—81.7% | |||||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
$400M | 1/12/2015 | 0.06 | % | $ 399,993 | |||
345M | 1/14/2015 | 0.11 | 344,987 | ||||
500M | 1/20/2015 | 0.06 | 499,985 | ||||
520M | 3/16/2015 | 0.11 | 519,882 | ||||
500M | 4/22/2015 | 0.11 | 499,830 | ||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
400M | 1/20/2015 | 0.07 | 399,985 | ||||
370M | 1/29/2015 | 0.09 | 369,974 | ||||
400M | 2/9/2015 | 0.07 | 399,970 | ||||
300M | 2/20/2015 | 0.07 | 299,971 | ||||
400M | 2/20/2015 | 0.08 | 399,956 | ||||
400M | 3/13/2015 | 0.10 | 399,921 | ||||
400M | 3/13/2015 | 0.14 | 399,890 | ||||
Freddie Mac: | |||||||
600M | 2/2/2015 | 0.09 | 599,952 | ||||
400M | 2/3/2015 | 0.06 | 399,978 | ||||
467M | 2/9/2015 | 0.09 | 466,957 | ||||
400M | 2/11/2015 | 0.11 | 399,950 | ||||
300M | 2/13/2015 | 0.11 | 299,961 | ||||
350M | 3/17/2015 | 0.07 | 349,953 | ||||
700M | 4/21/2015 | 0.12 | 699,743 | ||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $8,150,838) | 8,150,838 | ||||||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES—18.0% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
500M | 2/3/2015 | 0.10 | 500,007 | ||||
400M | 4/16/2015 | 0.12 | 400,018 | ||||
400M | Mississippi Business Finance Corp. | ||||||
(Chevron USA, Inc.), 12/1/2030 | 0.03 | 400,000 | |||||
Valdez, Alaska Marine Terminal Rev.: | |||||||
300M | Exxon Pipeline Co. Project B 12/1/2033 | 0.02 | 300,000 | ||||
200M | Exxon Pipeline Co. Project C 12/1/2033 | 0.02 | 200,000 | ||||
Total Value of Variable and Floating Rate Notes (cost $1,800,025) | 1,800,025 |
5 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
CORPORATE NOTES—10.0% | |||||||
$500M | Coca-Cola Co., 3/11/2015 (a) | 0.15 | % | $ 499,856 | |||
500M | Procter & Gamble Co., 3/17/2015 (a) | 0.12 | 499,875 | ||||
Total Value of Corporate Notes (cost $999,731) | 999,731 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—4.0% | |||||||
400M | U.S. Treasury Bills, 2/26/2015 (cost $399,987) | 0.02 | 399,987 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $11,350,581)** | 113.7 | % | 11,350,581 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (13.7 | ) | (1,373,047) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 9,977,534 |
* | The interest rates shown are the effective rates at the time of purchase by the Fund. The interest |
rates shown on variable and floating rate notes are adjusted periodically; the rates shown are the | |
rates in effect at December 31, 2014. | |
** | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is the same. |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 5). |
6 |
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | $ | — | $ | 8,150,838 | $ | — | $ | 8,150,838 | ||||
Variable and Floating Rate Notes: | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 900,025 | — | 900,025 | ||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 900,000 | — | 900,000 | ||||||||
Corporate Notes | — | 999,731 | — | 999,731 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 399,987 | — | 399,987 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 11,350,581 | $ | — | $ | 11,350,581 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 7 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Life Equity Income Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 8.26%, including dividends of 35.6 cents per share and capital gains of 86.7 cents per share.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
The Fund primarily invests in dividend-paying stocks. With interest rates moving lower over the year, the Fund’s high yielding stocks performed very well, as investors sought the relatively attractive income opportunities of dividend-paying equities. On a relative basis, the Fund outperformed the high dividend-yielding components in the Fund’s benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The fund underperformed the S&P 500, which gained 13.69% during the period, due to strong returns in non-dividend-paying large-cap stocks. This occurred primarily within the technology sector, which had a very strong year. The Fund was also disadvantaged in its small-cap weighting relative to the benchmark; the S&P 500 has virtually no small-cap allocations, whereas the Fund has a healthy allocation to small-caps, which underperformed both large and mid-cap stocks this year.
The Fund’s absolute performance is attributable to positive stock selection in the healthcare and technology sectors. Fund holding Actavis has been on an acquisition spree over the past year, and the acquired earnings and cash flow have led to healthy stock returns. The Fund acquired the stock when a previous holding, Warner Chilcott, was bought by Actavis in an all-stock deal. In February, Actavis acquired Forest Laboratories in a highly accretive deal that should add to earnings growth with new products and higher cost savings. AbbVie, a global pharmaceutical company, performed extremely well, with their new drug for the treatment of Hepatitis-C just recently launched and its established Humira drug expected to hit sales of $15 billion in the next few years. Another fund holding in the sector, Covidien, was recently acquired by Medtronic at a very nice premium. It is expected that Medtronic will integrate Covidien’s medical supply and device business into their own, which should in turn produce very good earnings for Medtronic, now a holding of the fund.
In technology, Avago Technologies also had a great year, as they have increased their content on the new iPhone as well as made several acquisitions to complement their core organic growth. Intel surprised many investors this year with its strong performance. With the growth of tablets and iPads, many thought the PC was a thing of the past, but a corporate upgrade cycle has brought PC demand above expectations, benefitting semiconductor makers such as Intel. Growth in servers that power cloud-based technologies has also far exceeded market expectations, contributing to the company’s performance.
On a relative basis, the fund outperformed the benchmark in the consumer discretionary and utilities sectors, and underperformed the benchmark in the technology and industrials sectors.
8 |
While Apple performed well on an absolute basis, it was an area of underperformance on a relative basis compared to the S&P 500. The current weighting for Apple in the S&P 500 is over 3% and, therefore, caused a significant relative underperformance for the Fund.
The Fund also underperformed in the technology sector because of its investment strategy of investing primarily in dividend-paying stocks, which meant it did not participate in the strong stock performance of Google and/or Facebook, which were strong contributors to the benchmark’s performance but do not pay a dividend.
In industrials, Equity Income’s small- and mid-cap names did not perform to expectations. ADT, the home security provider, suffered from higher-than-expected turnover of customers, sales disruptions and some higher costs, as installation of new products had a longer learning curve for their installation crews. With the higher margins offered by the new products and the sales disruptions likely behind them, we feel the business is stabilizing and should offer healthy returns with a nice dividend yield going forward.
In the consumer discretionary sector, the Fund had a strong year and great returns from Hanesbrands. The apparel maker recently closed on two acquisitions that provide them with significant runway for future earnings growth and good free cash flow. They acquired Maidenform, which had strong brands but a poor cost structure, and DB Apparel, which gave them a much-needed gateway into Europe. Both companies offer Hanesbrands significant synergies, as they should be able to improve margins using Hanesbrands’ best in class manufacturing, distribution and technology. Hanesbrands also raised the dividend by 50% this year, and we expect more dividend growth as the cash flow from these acquisitions continues to grow.
As we look forward, dividend-paying stocks should be a focus for any investor. Dividend-paying stocks tend to outperform non-dividend-paying stocks when interest rates are either rising or falling. If we look at stock returns since the 1970’s, dividend-paying stocks have outperformed the S&P 500 Index. The Fund is focused on identifying stocks that should provide not only yield and stability, but dividend growth and appreciation too.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
9 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,017.68 | $4.07 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,021.18 | $4.08 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .80%, multiplied by the average |
account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
10 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Equity Income Fund and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Equity Income Fund beginning 12/31/04 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
11 |
Portfolio of Investments
EQUITY INCOME FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—92.6% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—10.6% | ||||
5,680 | BorgWarner, Inc. | $ 312,116 | ||
4,887 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 270,447 | ||
26,150 | Comcast Corporation – Special Shares “A” | 1,505,325 | ||
15,100 | CST Brands, Inc. | 658,511 | ||
9,500 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 690,840 | ||
18,950 | Ford Motor Company | 293,725 | ||
9,500 | Hanesbrands, Inc. | 1,060,390 | ||
7,650 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 816,331 | ||
8,050 | Home Depot, Inc. | 845,008 | ||
8,550 | Lear Corporation | 838,584 | ||
6,900 | McDonald’s Corporation | 646,530 | ||
15,600 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 594,204 | ||
41,500 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 886,440 | ||
12,716 | Time Warner, Inc. | 1,086,201 | ||
5,800 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 365,400 | ||
5,000 | Walt Disney Company | 470,950 | ||
1,500 | Whirlpool Corporation | 290,610 | ||
11,631,612 | ||||
Consumer Staples—9.5% | ||||
37,800 | Altria Group, Inc. | 1,862,406 | ||
12,200 | Coca-Cola Company | 515,084 | ||
14,600 | CVS Health Corporation | 1,406,126 | ||
3,700 | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. | 265,216 | ||
4,500 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 519,930 | ||
15,766 | Kraft Foods Group, Inc. | 987,898 | ||
12,700 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 554,990 | ||
12,000 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 1,134,720 | ||
16,500 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 1,343,925 | ||
13,700 | Procter & Gamble Company | 1,247,933 | ||
6,500 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 558,220 | ||
10,396,448 | ||||
Energy—8.2% | ||||
15,100 | Chevron Corporation | 1,693,918 | ||
19,250 | ConocoPhillips | 1,329,405 | ||
9,100 | Devon Energy Corporation | 557,011 | ||
16,200 | Enable Midstream Partners, LP | 314,118 | ||
6,200 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 185,690 | ||
9,000 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 832,050 |
12 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
13,200 | Halliburton Company | $ 519,156 | ||
22,600 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 639,354 | ||
6,200 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 559,612 | ||
12,200 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 983,442 | ||
12,500 | Royal Dutch Shell, PLC – Class “A” (ADR) | 836,875 | ||
16,300 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 518,014 | ||
8,968,645 | ||||
Financials—18.2% | ||||
10,000 | ACE, Ltd. | 1,148,800 | ||
8,550 | American Express Company | 795,492 | ||
3,150 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 416,587 | ||
23,250 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 619,845 | ||
37,300 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 926,532 | ||
6,372 | Chubb Corporation | 659,311 | ||
12,350 | Discover Financial Services | 808,801 | ||
52,070 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 1,287,691 | ||
10,500 | Invesco, Ltd. | 414,960 | ||
13,300 | iShares S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index Fund (ETF) | 524,552 | ||
31,800 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 1,990,044 | ||
28,500 | MetLife, Inc. | 1,541,565 | ||
16,700 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 257,180 | ||
24,410 | Outfront Media, Inc. | 655,164 | ||
10,000 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 912,300 | ||
10,400 | Protective Life Corporation | 724,360 | ||
10,800 | Select Income REIT (REIT) | 263,628 | ||
3,100 | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (ETF) | 637,050 | ||
47,300 | Sterling Bancorp | 680,174 | ||
5,400 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 571,590 | ||
19,500 | U.S. Bancorp | 876,525 | ||
26,300 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 575,444 | ||
48,700 | Washington Prime Group, Inc. (REIT) | 838,614 | ||
32,800 | Wells Fargo & Company | 1,798,096 | ||
19,924,305 | ||||
Health Care—13.8% | ||||
8,200 | Abbott Laboratories | 369,164 | ||
21,000 | AbbVie, Inc. | 1,374,240 | ||
3,370 | * | Actavis, PLC | 867,472 | |
13,300 | Baxter International, Inc. | 974,757 | ||
9,950 | Covidien, PLC | 1,017,686 |
13 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Health Care (continued) | ||||
8,150 | GlaxoSmithKline, PLC (ADR) | $ 348,331 | ||
18,250 | Johnson & Johnson | 1,908,402 | ||
4,210 | McKesson Corporation | 873,912 | ||
36,920 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 2,096,687 | ||
12,300 | Omnicare, Inc. | 897,039 | ||
3,050 | Perrigo Company, PLC | 509,838 | ||
76,285 | Pfizer, Inc. | 2,376,278 | ||
5,600 | * | Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. | 194,432 | |
4,950 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 620,186 | ||
15,690 | Zoetis, Inc. | 675,141 | ||
15,103,565 | ||||
Industrials—10.5% | ||||
5,400 | 3M Company | 887,328 | ||
9,900 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 558,459 | ||
19,261 | ADT Corporation | 697,826 | ||
9,100 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 258,349 | ||
5,800 | Eaton Corporation, PLC | 394,168 | ||
3,800 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 269,230 | ||
5,750 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 268,870 | |
3,400 | General Dynamics Corporation | 467,908 | ||
74,130 | General Electric Company | 1,873,265 | ||
9,600 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 515,808 | ||
11,800 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 1,179,056 | ||
17,250 | ITT Corporation | 697,935 | ||
9,200 | Kforce, Inc. | 221,996 | ||
2,500 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 481,425 | ||
3,850 | Snap-On, Inc. | 526,449 | ||
12,125 | Tyco International, PLC | 531,803 | ||
6,100 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | 678,137 | ||
9,000 | United Technologies Corporation | 1,035,000 | ||
11,543,012 | ||||
Information Technology—10.3% | ||||
13,290 | Apple, Inc. | 1,466,950 | ||
4,150 | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 345,986 | ||
6,600 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 663,894 | ||
55,300 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1,538,169 | ||
17,300 | EMC Corporation | 514,502 | ||
50,000 | Intel Corporation | 1,814,500 | ||
13,550 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 196,068 |
14 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||
11,600 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | $ 258,912 | ||
27,200 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 596,224 | ||
14,600 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 533,046 | ||
7,600 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 342,836 | ||
41,550 | Microsoft Corporation | 1,929,997 | ||
8,100 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 602,073 | ||
7,350 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 464,888 | ||
11,268,045 | ||||
Materials—3.8% | ||||
5,200 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 240,084 | ||
18,350 | Dow Chemical Company | 836,943 | ||
12,790 | DuPont (E.I.) de Nemours & Company | 945,693 | ||
16,350 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 381,936 | ||
16,300 | International Paper Company | 873,354 | ||
8,300 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 658,937 | ||
3,700 | Westlake Chemical Corporation | 226,033 | ||
4,162,980 | ||||
Telecommunication Services—2.8% | ||||
35,610 | AT&T, Inc. | 1,196,140 | ||
41,100 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 1,922,658 | ||
3,118,798 | ||||
Utilities—4.9% | ||||
12,250 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 743,820 | ||
7,550 | Dominion Resources, Inc. | 580,595 | ||
6,600 | Duke Energy Corporation | 551,364 | ||
5,700 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 605,853 | ||
18,150 | NiSource, Inc. | 769,923 | ||
13,100 | Portland General Electric Company | 495,573 | ||
25,600 | PPL Corporation | 930,048 | ||
14,400 | Vectren Corporation | 665,712 | ||
5,342,888 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $71,254,494) | 101,460,298 |
15 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
PREFERRED STOCKS—.7% | |||||||
Financials | |||||||
11,400 | Digital Realty Trust, Inc., Series G, 5.875%, 2049 (REIT) | $ 262,428 | |||||
9,000 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc., Series F, 7.125%, 2049 (REIT) | 234,000 | |||||
11,000 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc., Series G, 6.75%, 2049 (REIT) | 285,065 | |||||
Total Value of Preferred Stocks (cost $782,929) | 781,493 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—5.5% | |||||||
$ 1,000M | Fannie Mae, 0.02%, 1/20/2015 | 999,989 | |||||
5,000M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.05%, 1/13/2015 | 4,999,917 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $5,999,906) | 5,999,906 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $78,037,329) | 98.8 | % | 108,241,697 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.2 | 1,299,843 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $109,541,540 |
* | Non-income producing | |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
16 |
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 101,460,298 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 101,460,298 | ||||
Preferred Stocks | 781,493 | — | — | 781,493 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 5,999,906 | — | 5,999,906 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 102,241,791 | $ | 5,999,906 | $ | — | $ | 108,241,697 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks |
and preferred stocks. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 17 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
FUND FOR INCOME
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Life Fund For Income annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 0.79%, including dividends of 36.9 cents per share.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
2014 was a challenging year in the high yield corporate credit market. The second half of the year proved particularly difficult for active managers as volatility increased and investors favored higher quality credit. Within high yield, investors often worry that flagging credit quality could be a source of market stress. For the most part, however, 2014’s high yield market volatility did not result from widespread credit weakness, but rather from two larger macroeconomic trends. First, in U.S. fixed income, investors strongly favored U.S. Treasuries during the review period. As global investors rushed into U.S. Treasuries, pushing interest rates down and prices up, interest rate-sensitive paper — including longer-duration, higher-rated corporate credit — performed strongly. This trend was exacerbated as the U.S. Dollar strengthened, increasing the U.S. Treasury market’s status as a safe haven, and forcing 10-year Treasury rates to drop. High yield paper, which is more credit-sensitive than interest rate-sensitive, did not benefit as much from this trend. Second, the 50% decline in the price of oil over the second half of the year, and especially the dramatic drop in the fourth quarter, negatively impacted the U.S. high yield market, which is significantly exposed to energy companies. While the high yield market finished the year with a modest positive return, overall performance was constrained as energy credits faced heavy selling by investors, often without careful discrimination among energy company balance sheets or business models.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
In this difficult environment, the Fund underperformed its benchmark, the Bank of America Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, which returned 3.48%. During the first half of the year, the fund underperformed most notably as a result of its relatively shorter duration and resulting underexposure to interest rate risk. As described above, investors rewarded interest rate risk in 2014, a trend that we believe is unlikely to repeat in 2015 should interest rates begin to rise. Indeed, we believe that getting credit analysis right is the most important factor in generating attractive risk-adjusted returns in high yield over the long-term. We typically prefer, therefore, credit risk to interest rate risk in the portfolio and continue to position the Fund accordingly.
As we shifted to the final quarter, the Fund underperformed the benchmark primarily through its significant exposure to the energy sector. Prices for the Fund’s energy
18 |
sector holdings traded off in the market indiscriminately, as the sector was broadly hit by investor fear and uncertainty. It is worthwhile to note that the portfolio did not experience any credit defaults or permanent credit impairments in its holdings in 2014. Secondarily, the Fund underperformed at the year’s close due to its positions in the metals and mining sector. Slowing global growth outside the U.S. pressured not only oil prices, but commodity prices more broadly. Our overweighting to this weak-performing sector, therefore, hurt returns, even though we outperformed the market on a credit selection basis.
As of year-end, the U.S. high yield market delivered an attractive yield over U.S. Treasury investments and featured relatively appealing yields of 5.9%. Default rates in 2014 were relatively low compared with long-term averages. This was especially so when removing the market’s largest default, TXU, which was widely anticipated and priced into the market for some time, from the calculation. The Fund had no holdings in TXU during the period.
So, what does this mean for the year ahead? Firstly, the spread over interest rates should continue to provide a background that is favorable for corporate credit. Secondly, the corporate credit markets, in our view, remain in good shape. Although some higher-cost energy producers could struggle, meaningful energy-related defaults would likely only occur if low commodity prices persisted for some time. We think US default rates in 2015 will likely remain very low, probably below 2%. Taking these together, spreads are above long-term averages and defaults are likely to be below long-term averages. Corporate balance sheets continue to be strong and there is a general lack of refinancing need for several years. These technical dynamics and fundamental characteristics should help produce attractive returns. A gradually improving US economy should be favorable for corporate cash flows and could help offset the expected modest increase in interest rates in the latter half of the year.
With all that said, it is necessary to caveat our calls for 2015 by noting that the market consensus about interest rates, oil prices, and other economic factors were incorrect in 2014. We believe that 2015 will continue to be influenced by macro factors such as central bank policy, the direction of oil prices, and other macroeconomic factors that may be difficult to predict. We believe investors in high yield are well-served over the long-term by focusing on investing in carefully-selected companies that can repay what they have borrowed under a wide range of market conditions and macroeconomic scenarios. Disciplined selection is not likely to lead to outperformance in the market’s most speculative phases, nor does it make a portfolio immune to the pain of shorter-term price jostling as we experienced in 2014, but it should lead to attractive returns throughout a market cycle. We think that 2015 is likely to offer some of the volatility that emerged at the end of 2014. This means that there could be times when investors swing between risk-on and risk-off postures, potentially
19 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
sending high yield prices up and down for largely technical reasons, rather than for reasons of fundamental valuation. While such technically induced corrections can be uncomfortable for short-term investors, we believe they present long-term investors with opportunities to invest in the debt of creditworthy companies at attractive yields and prices. Short-term market swings will ultimately matter much less to investors than being paid interest and principal.
Within the energy sector, we see discomfort likely extending through the first half of the year, as it will take some time to bring supply and demand back into a more profitable balance for oil and gas producers. That said, low energy prices can benefit a number of high yield companies in other industries. Those opportunities should neither be overlooked, nor expected to last long, requiring careful active management.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
20 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $965.98 | $4.16 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,020.98 | $4.28 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .84%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
21 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Fund For Income and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Fund For Income beginning 12/31/04 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index (the “Index”). The Index contains all securities in the BofA Merrill Lynch US Cash Pay High Yield Index rated BB1 through B3, based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, but caps issuer exposure at 2%. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. The issuers of the high yield bonds in which the Fund primarily invests pay higher interest rates because they have a greater likelihood of financial difficulty, which could result in their inability to repay the bonds fully when due. Prices of high yield bonds are also subject to greater fluctuations. Index figures from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
22 |
Portfolio of Investments
FUND FOR INCOME
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
CORPORATE BONDS—89.1% | ||||
Aerospace/Defense—.6% | ||||
$100M | Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 5%, 12/15/2021 (a) | $ 101,875 | ||
475M | Meccanica Holdings USA, Inc., 6.25%, 7/15/2019 (a) | 520,125 | ||
622,000 | ||||
Automotive—3.0% | ||||
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.: | ||||
400M | 6.25%, 3/15/2021 | 422,000 | ||
250M | 6.625%, 10/15/2022 | 266,250 | ||
175M | Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., 6%, 12/15/2024 (a) | 178,500 | ||
General Motors Co.: | ||||
200M | 6.25%, 10/2/2043 | 239,920 | ||
100M | 5.2%, 4/1/2045 | 105,750 | ||
650M | Gestamp Funding Luxembourg SA, 5.625%, 5/31/2020 (a) | 659,750 | ||
Hertz Corp.: | ||||
300M | 5.875%, 10/15/2020 | 303,750 | ||
25M | 6.25%, 10/15/2022 | 25,375 | ||
Oshkosh Corp.: | ||||
375M | 8.5%, 3/1/2020 | 394,688 | ||
75M | 5.375%, 3/1/2022 | 76,875 | ||
325M | Schaeffler Finance BV, 4.75%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 326,625 | ||
2,999,483 | ||||
Building Materials—1.5% | ||||
Building Materials Corp.: | ||||
100M | 6.75%, 5/1/2021 (a) | 106,000 | ||
275M | 5.375%, 11/15/2024 (a) | 275,687 | ||
200M | Cemex Finance, LLC, 9.375%, 10/12/2022 (a) | 224,000 | ||
200M | Cemex SAB de CV, 9.5%, 6/15/2018 (a) | 219,000 | ||
425M | Griffon Corp., 5.25%, 3/1/2022 | 399,500 | ||
232M | USG Corp., 5.875%, 11/1/2021 (a) | 235,480 | ||
1,459,667 | ||||
Chemicals—1.0% | ||||
250M | Rayonier AM Products, Inc., 5.5%, 6/1/2024 (a) | 206,563 | ||
575M | TPC Group, Inc., 8.75%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 562,063 | ||
W.R. Grace & Co.: | ||||
175M | 5.125%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 179,812 | ||
75M | 5.625%, 10/1/2024 (a) | 78,469 | ||
1,026,907 |
23 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Consumer Non-Durables—2.5% | ||||
Levi Strauss & Co.: | ||||
$350M | 7.625%, 5/15/2020 | $ 369,250 | ||
375M | 6.875%, 5/1/2022 | 405,000 | ||
Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc.: | ||||
400M | 7.125%, 4/15/2019 | 414,500 | ||
775M | 5.75%, 10/15/2020 | 798,250 | ||
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp.: | ||||
300M | 6.375%, 11/15/2020 | 314,250 | ||
175M | 6.625%, 11/15/2022 | 185,938 | ||
2,487,188 | ||||
Energy—13.6% | ||||
AmeriGas Finance, LLC: | ||||
50M | 6.75%, 5/20/2020 | 51,750 | ||
175M | 7%, 5/20/2022 | 182,000 | ||
Antero Resources Finance Corp.: | ||||
100M | 6%, 12/1/2020 | 100,250 | ||
125M | 5.375%, 11/1/2021 | 121,406 | ||
Atlas Pipeline Partners, LP: | ||||
450M | 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 429,750 | ||
550M | 5.875%, 8/1/2023 | 547,250 | ||
250M | Basic Energy Services, Inc., 7.75%, 10/15/2022 | 192,500 | ||
Berry Petroleum Co.: | ||||
90M | 6.75%, 11/1/2020 | 72,450 | ||
300M | 6.375%, 9/15/2022 | 229,500 | ||
75M | Blue Racer Midstream, LLC, 6.125%, 11/15/2022 (a) | 72,562 | ||
150M | California Resources Corp., 5.5%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 129,000 | ||
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, LP: | ||||
325M | 9.625%, 8/1/2020 | 339,625 | ||
150M | 6.5%, 4/15/2021 (a) | 134,625 | ||
75M | 7.625%, 1/15/2022 | 69,750 | ||
Chesapeake Energy Corp.: | ||||
275M | 7.25%, 12/15/2018 | 302,500 | ||
125M | 6.625%, 8/15/2020 | 133,437 | ||
250M | 6.875%, 11/15/2020 | 270,000 | ||
200M | 5.75%, 3/15/2023 | 207,000 | ||
CONSOL Energy, Inc.: | ||||
625M | 8.25%, 4/1/2020 | 650,781 | ||
175M | 5.875%, 4/15/2022 (a) | 163,625 | ||
350M | Crestwood Midstream Partners, LP, 6%, 12/15/2020 | 336,875 | ||
375M | El Paso Corp., 6.5%, 9/15/2020 | 424,819 |
24 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
$575M | Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc., 7.5%, 12/15/2021 | $ 313,375 | ||
200M | Enquest, PLC, 7%, 4/15/2022 (a) | 126,000 | ||
225M | Exterran Partners, LP, 6%, 10/1/2022 (a) | 193,500 | ||
175M | Forum Energy Technologies, Inc., 6.25%, 10/1/2021 | 165,375 | ||
300M | Gibson Energy, Inc., 6.75%, 7/15/2021 (a) | 300,750 | ||
Kinder Morgan, Inc.: | ||||
100M | 5%, 2/15/2021 (a) | 104,170 | ||
225M | 5.625%, 11/15/2023 (a) | 241,259 | ||
250M | Laredo Petroleum, Inc., 5.625%, 1/15/2022 | 220,000 | ||
Legacy Reserves, LP: | ||||
400M | 8%, 12/1/2020 | 334,000 | ||
225M | 6.625%, 12/1/2021 | 185,625 | ||
175M | 6.625%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 144,375 | ||
Linn Energy, LLC: | ||||
75M | 6.5%, 5/15/2019 | 64,500 | ||
225M | 6.25%, 11/1/2019 | 192,375 | ||
175M | 8.625%, 4/15/2020 | 153,125 | ||
475M | 7.75%, 2/1/2021 | 402,563 | ||
250M | McDermott Finance, LLC, 8%, 5/1/2021 (a) | 177,500 | ||
375M | Memorial Production Partners, LP, 7.625%, 5/1/2021 | 301,875 | ||
285M | Northern Blizzard Resources, Inc., 7.25%, 2/1/2022 (a) | 232,275 | ||
NuStar Logistics, LP: | ||||
50M | 4.8%, 9/1/2020 | 47,500 | ||
200M | 6.75%, 2/1/2021 | 212,027 | ||
Offshore Group Investment, Ltd.: | ||||
525M | 7.5%, 11/1/2019 | 393,750 | ||
100M | 7.125%, 4/1/2023 | 72,000 | ||
225M | Pacific Drilling SA, 5.375%, 6/1/2020 (a) | 185,625 | ||
175M | Pioneer Energy Services Corp., 6.125%, 3/15/2022 | 134,750 | ||
600M | Rain CII Carbon, LLC, 8.25%, 1/15/2021 (a) | 616,500 | ||
Rex Energy Corp.: | ||||
150M | 8.875%, 12/1/2020 | 135,000 | ||
300M | 6.25%, 8/1/2022 (a) | 224,625 | ||
400M | RKI Exploration and Production, LLC, 8.5%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 325,000 | ||
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC: | ||||
500M | 6.25%, 3/15/2022 | 509,375 | ||
225M | 5.625%, 4/15/2023 | 221,063 | ||
325M | 5.75%, 5/15/2024 | 320,531 | ||
325M | Samson Investment Co., 9.75%, 2/15/2020 | 136,297 | ||
275M | SandRidge Energy, Inc., 7.5%, 2/15/2023 | 177,375 | ||
150M | SM Energy Co., 6.5%, 11/15/2021 | 146,250 |
25 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
$ 57M | Suburban Propane Partners, LP, 7.375%, 8/1/2021 | $ 59,993 | ||
100M | Tesoro Logistics, LP, 6.25%, 10/15/2022 (a) | 100,250 | ||
425M | Unit Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/2021 | 382,500 | ||
13,414,508 | ||||
Financials—4.7% | ||||
Ally Financial, Inc.: | ||||
450M | 6.25%, 12/1/2017 | 487,125 | ||
175M | 4.75%, 9/10/2018 | 181,562 | ||
563M | 8%, 3/15/2020 | 665,747 | ||
175M | 8%, 11/1/2031 | 223,562 | ||
674M | Consolidated Energy Finance SA, 6.75%, 10/15/2019 (a) | 662,205 | ||
General Motors Financial Co., Inc.: | ||||
75M | 3.25%, 5/15/2018 | 75,281 | ||
200M | 6.75%, 6/1/2018 | 227,000 | ||
150M | 4.375%, 9/25/2021 | 156,750 | ||
300M | 4.25%, 5/15/2023 | 306,717 | ||
International Lease Finance Corp.: | ||||
650M | 8.75%, 3/15/2017 | 721,500 | ||
625M | 8.25%, 12/15/2020 | 754,687 | ||
200M | Nielsen Co., (Luxembourg) Sarl, 5.5%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 205,000 | ||
4,667,136 | ||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—2.0% | ||||
325M | Barry Callebaut Services SA, 5.5%, 6/15/2023 (a) | 348,368 | ||
98M | Chiquita Brands International, Inc., 7.875%, 2/1/2021 | 105,717 | ||
125M | Constellation Brands, Inc., 4.75%, 11/15/2024 | 126,875 | ||
125M | Darling Ingredients, Inc., 5.375%, 1/15/2022 | 123,594 | ||
400M | JBS Investments GmbH, 7.25%, 4/3/2024 (a) | 394,000 | ||
JBS USA, LLC: | ||||
225M | 7.25%, 6/1/2021 (a) | 232,875 | ||
250M | 5.875%, 7/15/2024 (a) | 246,250 | ||
200M | Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 204,500 | ||
175M | Treehouse Foods, Inc., 4.875%, 3/15/2022 | 177,625 | ||
1,959,804 | ||||
Food/Drug—.2% | ||||
200M | BI-LO, LLC, 8.625%, 9/15/2018 (a) | 151,000 | ||
75M | Supervalu, Inc., 7.75%, 11/15/2022 | 73,875 | ||
224,875 |
26 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Forest Products/Containers—3.8% | ||||
$225M | Ardagh Packaging Finance, PLC, 6%, 6/30/2021 (a) | $ 215,437 | ||
300M | CROWN Americas, LLC, 4.5%, 1/15/2023 | 292,500 | ||
150M | Graphic Packaging International, Inc., 4.875%, 11/15/2022 | 151,125 | ||
600M | Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 8/1/2019 | 681,000 | ||
Mercer International, Inc.: | ||||
50M | 7%, 12/1/2019 (a) | 50,625 | ||
200M | 7.75%, 12/1/2022 (a) | 203,000 | ||
Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.: | ||||
75M | 5%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 76,594 | ||
175M | 5.375%, 1/15/2025 (a) | 176,969 | ||
Sealed Air Corp.: | ||||
625M | 6.5%, 12/1/2020 (a) | 687,500 | ||
165M | 8.375%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 185,213 | ||
75M | 4.875%, 12/1/2022 (a) | 74,625 | ||
75M | 5.125%, 12/1/2024 (a) | 75,938 | ||
500M | Silgan Holdings, Inc., 5%, 4/1/2020 | 510,000 | ||
374M | Tekni-Plex, Inc., 9.75%, 6/1/2019 (a) | 407,660 | ||
3,788,186 | ||||
Gaming/Leisure—2.4% | ||||
375M | 24 Hour Holdings III, LLC, 8%, 6/1/2022 (a) | 301,875 | ||
250M | GLP Capital, LP, 4.875%, 11/1/2020 | 254,375 | ||
175M | Hilton Worldwide Finance, LLC, 5.625%, 10/15/2021 | 183,750 | ||
450M | National CineMedia, LLC, 7.875%, 7/15/2021 | 475,875 | ||
250M | NCL Corp., Ltd., 5.25%, 11/15/2019 (a) | 253,125 | ||
225M | Regal Entertainment Group, 5.75%, 3/15/2022 | 216,000 | ||
450M | Scientific Games International, Inc., 6.625%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 315,563 | ||
375M | Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/2021 (a) | 376,875 | ||
2,377,438 | ||||
Health Care—8.2% | ||||
Aviv Healthcare Properties, LP: | ||||
115M | 7.75%, 2/15/2019 | 120,261 | ||
100M | 6%, 10/15/2021 | 104,375 | ||
710M | Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 8/1/2020 | 761,475 | ||
Community Health Systems, Inc.: | ||||
250M | 5.125%, 8/15/2018 | 259,375 | ||
300M | 8%, 11/15/2019 | 321,000 | ||
325M | 7.125%, 7/15/2020 | 346,937 | ||
700M | Endo Finance Co., 5.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 701,750 |
27 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Health Care (continued) | ||||
Fresenius Medical Care US Finance II, Inc.: | ||||
$150M | 5.625%, 7/31/2019 (a) | $ 160,875 | ||
75M | 4.125%, 10/15/2020 (a) | 75,750 | ||
100M | 4.75%, 10/15/2024 (a) | 101,500 | ||
HCA, Inc.: | ||||
75M | 8%, 10/1/2018 | 86,062 | ||
425M | 6.5%, 2/15/2020 | 477,275 | ||
250M | 6.25%, 2/15/2021 | 266,875 | ||
275M | 7.75%, 5/15/2021 | 293,562 | ||
375M | 7.5%, 2/15/2022 | 429,375 | ||
HealthSouth Corp.: | ||||
125M | 8.125%, 2/15/2020 | 131,250 | ||
87M | 7.75%, 9/15/2022 | 92,655 | ||
350M | Kindred Escrow Corp. II, 8.75%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 378,438 | ||
100M | NBTY, Inc., 9%, 10/1/2018 | 101,500 | ||
Omnicare, Inc.: | ||||
75M | 4.75%, 12/1/2022 | 76,313 | ||
50M | 5%, 12/1/2024 | 51,500 | ||
225M | Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., 6%, 1/15/2021 (a) | 230,063 | ||
Tenet Healthcare Corp.: | ||||
450M | 6.75%, 2/1/2020 | 475,313 | ||
425M | 6%, 10/1/2020 | 457,440 | ||
314M | Universal Hospital Services, Inc., 7.625%, 8/15/2020 | 271,610 | ||
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.: | ||||
106M | 6.875%, 12/1/2018 (a) | 109,737 | ||
600M | 6.375%, 10/15/2020 (a) | 629,250 | ||
150M | 5.625%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 151,500 | ||
425M | WellCare Health Plans, Inc., 5.75%, 11/15/2020 | 440,938 | ||
8,103,954 | ||||
Information Technology—4.1% | ||||
Activision Blizzard, Inc.: | ||||
125M | 5.625%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 131,562 | ||
50M | 6.125%, 9/15/2023 (a) | 54,000 | ||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.: | ||||
50M | 6.75%, 3/1/2019 | 47,250 | ||
425M | 7.5%, 8/15/2022 | 384,625 | ||
100M | 7%, 7/1/2024 | 85,250 | ||
100M | Anixter, Inc., 5.125%, 10/1/2021 | 100,500 | ||
Audatex North America, Inc.: | ||||
725M | 6%, 6/15/2021 (a) | 750,375 | ||
225M | 6.125%, 11/1/2023 (a) | 233,437 |
28 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||
$200M | Belden, Inc., 5.5%, 9/1/2022 (a) | $ 199,500 | ||
250M | CommScope, Inc., 5%, 6/15/2021 (a) | 247,500 | ||
500M | Denali Borrower, LLC, 5.625%, 10/15/2020 (a) | 521,500 | ||
Equinix, Inc.: | ||||
125M | 5.375%, 1/1/2022 | 126,800 | ||
75M | 5.75%, 1/1/2025 | 76,031 | ||
350M | IAC/InterActiveCorp, 4.875%, 11/30/2018 | 357,875 | ||
Micron Technology, Inc.: | ||||
150M | 5.875%, 2/15/2022 (a) | 157,875 | ||
525M | 5.5%, 2/1/2025 (a) | 531,563 | ||
4,005,643 | ||||
Manufacturing—3.6% | ||||
100M | Amkor Technology, Inc., 6.375%, 10/1/2022 | 97,000 | ||
Bombardier, Inc.: | ||||
150M | 7.5%, 3/15/2018 (a) | 164,250 | ||
325M | 7.75%, 3/15/2020 (a) | 354,250 | ||
425M | Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc., 8.5%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 384,625 | ||
515M | Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 12/1/2017 | 569,075 | ||
325M | Dematic SA, 7.75%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 342,062 | ||
300M | EDP Finance BV, 6%, 2/2/2018 (a) | 325,428 | ||
225M | EnPro Industries, Inc., 5.875%, 9/15/2022 (a) | 228,094 | ||
400M | H&E Equipment Services, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2022 | 413,500 | ||
675M | Rexel SA, 6.125%, 12/15/2019 (a) | 698,625 | ||
3,576,909 | ||||
Media-Broadcasting—2.7% | ||||
Belo Corp.: | ||||
100M | 7.75%, 6/1/2027 | 110,500 | ||
25M | 7.25%, 9/15/2027 | 26,750 | ||
200M | Block Communications, Inc., 7.25%, 2/1/2020 (a) | 205,000 | ||
300M | LIN Television Corp., 8.375%, 4/15/2018 | 313,313 | ||
100M | Media General Financial Sub, 5.875%, 11/15/2022 (a) | 99,250 | ||
425M | Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/2020 | 443,063 | ||
Sinclair Television Group, Inc.: | ||||
475M | 5.375%, 4/1/2021 | 473,813 | ||
225M | 6.375%, 11/1/2021 | 232,875 |
29 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Media-Broadcasting (continued) | ||||
Sirius XM Radio, Inc.: | ||||
$375M | 5.75%, 8/1/2021 (a) | $ 385,313 | ||
100M | 4.625%, 5/15/2023 (a) | 94,000 | ||
250M | 6%, 7/15/2024 (a) | 256,875 | ||
2,640,752 | ||||
Media-Cable TV—7.3% | ||||
200M | Altice SA, 7.75%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 200,875 | ||
Cablevision Systems Corp.: | ||||
350M | 8.625%, 9/15/2017 | 390,250 | ||
375M | 7.75%, 4/15/2018 | 413,906 | ||
CCO Holdings, LLC: | ||||
250M | 7%, 1/15/2019 | 260,000 | ||
175M | 7.375%, 6/1/2020 | 185,937 | ||
75M | 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 75,844 | ||
100M | 5.125%, 2/15/2023 | 98,125 | ||
725M | Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, 6.375%, 9/15/2020 (a) | 754,000 | ||
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc.: | ||||
25M | 7.625%, 3/15/2020 Series “A” | 26,062 | ||
625M | 7.625%, 3/15/2020 Series “B” | 660,937 | ||
150M | 6.5%, 11/15/2022 Series “A” | 153,375 | ||
325M | 6.5%, 11/15/2022 Series “B” | 336,375 | ||
DISH DBS Corp.: | ||||
775M | 7.875%, 9/1/2019 | 881,562 | ||
125M | 5%, 3/15/2023 | 121,250 | ||
200M | 5.875%, 11/15/2024 (a) | 201,500 | ||
400M | Gray Television, Inc., 7.5%, 10/1/2020 | 414,000 | ||
775M | Harron Communications, LP, 9.125%, 4/1/2020 (a) | 848,625 | ||
300M | Midcontinent Communications Corp., 6.25%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 304,500 | ||
Numericable Group SA: | ||||
425M | 6%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 427,869 | ||
200M | 6.25%, 5/15/2024 (a) | 201,750 | ||
200M | VTR Finance BV, 6.875%, 1/15/2024 (a) | 204,500 | ||
7,161,242 | ||||
Media-Diversified—.7% | ||||
Gannett Co., Inc.: | ||||
225M | 5.125%, 7/15/2020 | 230,625 | ||
225M | 6.375%, 10/15/2023 | 239,625 | ||
175M | Lamar Media Corp., 5.375%, 1/15/2024 | 181,125 | ||
651,375 |
30 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Metals/Mining—6.7% | ||||
Alcoa, Inc.: | ||||
$650M | 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | $ 731,708 | ||
100M | 5.125%, 10/1/2024 | 106,177 | ||
Aleris International, Inc.: | ||||
100M | 7.625%, 2/15/2018 | 101,125 | ||
550M | 7.875%, 11/1/2020 | 550,000 | ||
ArcelorMittal: | ||||
275M | 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | 293,906 | ||
625M | 10.35%, 6/1/2019 | 757,031 | ||
75M | 6%, 3/1/2021 | 78,281 | ||
250M | 6.75%, 2/25/2022 | 268,125 | ||
Arch Coal, Inc.: | ||||
50M | 7%, 6/15/2019 | 15,250 | ||
325M | 7.25%, 10/1/2020 | 107,250 | ||
325M | 7.25%, 6/15/2021 | 96,281 | ||
Constellium NV: | ||||
250M | 8%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 249,375 | ||
250M | 5.75%, 5/15/2024 (a) | 218,750 | ||
600M | JMC Steel Group, 8.25%, 3/15/2018 (a) | 572,250 | ||
150M | Kaiser Aluminum Corp., 8.25%, 6/1/2020 | 163,500 | ||
Novelis, Inc.: | ||||
725M | 8.375%, 12/15/2017 | 753,094 | ||
175M | 8.75%, 12/15/2020 | 186,375 | ||
Peabody Energy Corp.: | ||||
275M | 6%, 11/15/2018 | 250,938 | ||
550M | 6.5%, 9/15/2020 | 479,875 | ||
100M | 7.875%, 11/1/2026 | 85,750 | ||
Steel Dynamics, Inc.: | ||||
75M | 5.125%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 76,406 | ||
100M | 6.375%, 8/15/2022 | 106,500 | ||
125M | 5.5%, 10/1/2024 (a) | 128,438 | ||
250M | Wise Metals Group, LLC, 8.75%, 12/15/2018 (a) | 263,750 | ||
6,640,135 | ||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—.3% | ||||
277M | Taylor Morrison Communities, Inc., 7.75%, 4/15/2020 (a) | 295,005 |
31 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.7% | ||||
$325M | Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 5%, 6/1/2022 (a) | $ 319,312 | ||
500M | Jo-Ann Stores, Inc., 8.125%, 3/15/2019 (a) | 467,500 | ||
450M | Limited Brands, Inc., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 535,500 | ||
300M | Party City Holdings, Inc., 8.875%, 8/1/2020 | 321,750 | ||
1,644,062 | ||||
Services—6.3% | ||||
ADT Corp.: | ||||
175M | 5.25%, 3/15/2020 | 178,062 | ||
575M | 3.5%, 7/15/2022 | 491,625 | ||
75M | 4.125%, 6/15/2023 | 68,062 | ||
Aecom Technology Corp.: | ||||
125M | 5.75%, 10/15/2022 (a) | 128,125 | ||
225M | 5.875%, 10/15/2024 (a) | 230,625 | ||
175M | APX Group, Inc., 6.375%, 12/1/2019 | 168,437 | ||
400M | Ashtead Capital, Inc., 6.5%, 7/15/2022 (a) | 427,000 | ||
225M | CoreLogic, Inc., 7.25%, 6/1/2021 | 237,375 | ||
Covanta Holding Corp.: | ||||
125M | 7.25%, 12/1/2020 | 133,437 | ||
300M | 6.375%, 10/1/2022 | 319,500 | ||
Geo Group, Inc.: | ||||
175M | 5.875%, 1/15/2022 | 180,250 | ||
175M | 5.875%, 10/15/2024 | 178,062 | ||
75M | IHS, Inc., 5% 11/1/2022 (a) | 74,625 | ||
Iron Mountain, Inc.: | ||||
225M | 7.75%, 10/1/2019 | 241,875 | ||
650M | 5.75%, 8/15/2024 | 657,313 | ||
650M | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2020 (a) | 689,000 | ||
500M | LKQ Corp., 4.75%, 5/15/2023 | 482,500 | ||
175M | Monitronics International, Inc., 9.125%, 4/1/2020 | 166,141 | ||
PHH Corp.: | ||||
275M | 7.375%, 9/1/2019 | 277,063 | ||
175M | 6.375%, 8/15/2021 | 161,219 | ||
375M | Reliance Intermediate Holdings, LP, 9.5%, 12/15/2019 (a) | 393,750 | ||
300M | Safway Group Holding, LLC, 7%, 5/15/2018 (a) | 286,500 | ||
6,170,546 | ||||
Telecommunications—5.5% | ||||
CenturyLink, Inc.: | ||||
100M | 5.625%, 4/1/2020 | 104,125 | ||
525M | 5.8%, 3/15/2022 | 547,312 | ||
175M | 6.75%, 12/1/2023 | 192,281 |
32 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Telecommunications (continued) | ||||
Citizens Communications Co.: | ||||
$575M | 7.125%, 3/15/2019 | $ 632,500 | ||
200M | 9%, 8/15/2031 | 212,000 | ||
175M | Frontier Communications Corp., 8.5%, 4/15/2020 | 196,000 | ||
450M | GCI, Inc., 8.625%, 11/15/2019 | 473,625 | ||
250M | Inmarsat Finance, PLC, 4.875%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 248,125 | ||
Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA: | ||||
450M | 7.25%, 4/1/2019 | 471,375 | ||
250M | 7.25%, 10/15/2020 | 264,687 | ||
Sprint Capital Corp.: | ||||
175M | 6.9%, 5/1/2019 | 179,375 | ||
375M | 6.875%, 11/15/2028 | 331,875 | ||
Wind Acquisition Finance SA: | ||||
275M | 4.75%, 7/15/2020 (a) | 257,813 | ||
675M | 7.375%, 4/23/2021 (a) | 638,753 | ||
Windstream Corp.: | ||||
200M | 7.875%, 11/1/2017 | 217,250 | ||
325M | 7.75%, 10/15/2020 | 336,375 | ||
100M | 6.375%, 8/1/2023 | 93,875 | ||
5,397,346 | ||||
Transportation—1.5% | ||||
Aircastle, Ltd.: | ||||
75M | 4.625%, 12/15/2018 | 75,562 | ||
775M | 6.25%, 12/1/2019 | 821,500 | ||
125M | American Airlines Group, Inc., 5.5%, 10/1/2019 (a) | 127,656 | ||
Fly Leasing, Ltd.: | ||||
200M | 6.75%, 12/15/2020 | 202,500 | ||
275M | 6.375%, 10/15/2021 | 271,562 | ||
1,498,780 | ||||
Utilities—2.1% | ||||
AES Corp.: | ||||
75M | 8%, 6/1/2020 | 86,062 | ||
275M | 7.375%, 7/1/2021 | 312,125 | ||
200M | 5.5%, 3/15/2024 | 203,960 | ||
325M | Dynergy Finance I/II, Inc., 7.375%, 11/1/2022 (a) | 331,094 | ||
112M | Indiantown Cogeneration Utilities, LP, 9.77%, 12/15/2020 | 126,880 |
33 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Utilities (continued) | ||||
$400M | InterGen NV, 7%, 6/30/2023 (a) | $ 382,000 | ||
200M | NRG Energy, Inc., 6.25%, 5/1/2024 (a) | 204,500 | ||
382M | NSG Holdings, LLC, 7.75%, 12/15/2025 (a) | 408,709 | ||
2,055,330 | ||||
Waste Management—.3% | ||||
275M | ADS Waste Holdings, Inc., 8.25%, 10/1/2020 | 276,375 | ||
Wireless Communications—2.8% | ||||
450M | MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 6.625%, 11/15/2020 | 459,563 | ||
100M | SBA Communications Corp., 4.875%, 7/15/2022 (a) | 96,500 | ||
Sprint Nextel Corp.: | ||||
100M | 9.125%, 3/1/2017 | 110,245 | ||
175M | 8.375%, 8/15/2017 | 189,438 | ||
525M | 7%, 8/15/2020 | 527,625 | ||
275M | 6%, 11/15/2022 | 254,031 | ||
250M | Telemar Norte Leste SA, 5.5%, 10/23/2020 (a) | 233,750 | ||
T-Mobile USA, Inc.: | ||||
450M | 6.25%, 4/1/2021 | 462,263 | ||
450M | 6.625%, 4/1/2023 | 463,050 | ||
2,796,465 | ||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $89,526,128) | 87,941,111 | |||
LOAN PARTICIPATIONS†—5.2% | ||||
Automotive—.2% | ||||
224M | CS Intermediate Holdco 2, LLC, 4%, 4/4/2021 | 220,657 | ||
Chemicals—.4% | ||||
353M | Axalta Coating Systems Dutch Holdings BBV, 3.75%, 2/1/2020 | 344,465 | ||
Energy—.6% | ||||
369M | Drillships Financing Holdings, Inc., 6%, 3/31/2021 | 293,157 | ||
300M | Jonah Energy, LLC, 7.5%, 5/12/2021 | 259,500 | ||
552,657 | ||||
Financial Services—.4% | ||||
398M | Ocwen Loan Servicing Corp., 5%, 2/15/2018 | 377,520 |
34 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Food/Drug—1.0% | ||||
$270M | Albertson’s, Inc., 4.75%, 3/21/2019 | $ 269,003 | ||
430M | Rite Aid Corp., 4.875%, 6/21/2021 | 429,283 | ||
334M | Supervalu, Inc., 4.5%, 3/21/2019 | 329,826 | ||
1,028,112 | ||||
Gaming/Leisure—.2% | ||||
222M | Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment, Inc., 3.5%, 5/14/2020 | 213,037 | ||
Information Technology—.7% | ||||
234M | ARRIS Enterprises, Inc., 3.25%, 4/17/2020 | 231,177 | ||
498M | Avago Technologies Cayman, Ltd., 3.75%, 5/6/2021 | 496,567 | ||
727,744 | ||||
Manufacturing—.4% | ||||
459M | Gardner Denver, Inc., 4.25%, 7/30/2020 | 431,062 | ||
Media-Diversified—.6% | ||||
622M | Tribune Co., 4%, 12/27/2020 | 613,090 | ||
Metals/Mining—.5% | ||||
366M | Arch Coal, Inc., 6.25%, 5/16/2018 | 303,783 | ||
170M | Oxbow Carbon, LLC, 8%, 1/17/2020 | 149,600 | ||
453,383 | ||||
Services—.2% | ||||
110M | Allied Security Holdings, LLC, 4.25%, 2/12/2021 | 108,103 | ||
84M | Brickman Group, Ltd., LLC, 4%, 12/18/2020 | 81,837 | ||
189,940 | ||||
Total Value of Loan Participations (cost $5,405,544) | 5,151,667 |
35 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
December 31, 2014
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES—.8% | |||||||
Transportation | |||||||
$751M | American Airlines 13-2 B PTT, 5.6%, 7/15/2020 (cost $767,735) (a) | $ 765,642 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $95,699,407) | 95.1 | % | 93,858,420 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 4.9 | 4,791,277 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $98,649,697 |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 5). |
† | The interest rates shown on variable and floating rate notes are adjusted periodically; the rates |
shown are the rates in effect at December 31, 2014. |
36 |
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 87,941,111 | $ | — | $ | 87,941,111 | ||||
Loan Participations | — | 5,151,667 | — | 5,151,667 | ||||||||
Pass Through Certificates | — | 765,642 | — | 765,642 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 93,858,420 | $ | — | $ | 93,858,420 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for corporate bonds, |
loan participations and pass through certificates. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
The following is a reconciliation of Fund investments valued using Level 3 inputs for the year:
Investments | Investments | |||||||||||
in Corporate | in Common | |||||||||||
Bonds | Stocks | Total | ||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2013 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Purchases | — | — | — | |||||||||
Sales | — | — | — | |||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation | 613,500 | 97,360 | 710,860 | |||||||||
Realized loss | (613,500) | (97,360) | (710,860) | |||||||||
Transfer into Level 3 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Transfer out of Level 3 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
See notes to financial statements | 37 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
GOVERNMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
We’re pleased to send you the First Investors Life Government Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 3.14%, including dividends of 25.6 cents per share.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy grew at approximately 2.5% during 2014, with growth accelerating in the second half of the year. Of note, the unemployment rate fell from 6.7% to 5.6%, its lowest level since 2008, as the economy created the most jobs in fifteen years. This good news was tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate (i.e., the percentage of the population participating in the labor force) and anemic wage growth. Inflation was subdued, with consumer prices increasing only 0.8%, compared to 1.5% in 2013, in part due to the decline in energy prices during the fourth quarter.
The improvement in the economy and labor market allowed the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) to conclude its bond buying program — part of its effort to stimulate growth by lowering interest rates — in October. As well, the Fed remained on course to begin raising the federal funds rate in the second half of 2015, although low inflation (below the Fed’s 2% target) and international developments could delay rate hikes.
Long-term U.S. interest rates moved sharply lower throughout the review period, despite a strong consensus at the beginning of the year that rates would continue to rise. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors: slower than expected global growth (especially in Europe), very low foreign interest rates, geopolitical events (e.g., Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS, Ebola) that supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, investors’ belief that the upcoming Fed tightening cycle would be more limited than in the past, and deflationary fears, which were exacerbated by the collapse in oil prices. For the year, the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield fell from 3.03%, a two-and-a-half year high, to 2.17%.
The broad U.S. bond market returned 6.3% during the review period, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. In particular, long-term bonds had very strong returns as interest rates fell and bond prices rose (interest rates, or yields, and bond prices have an inverse relationship; bond prices rise as interest rates fall). Notably, Treasury securities with maturities longer than ten years gained over 24%.
Returns varied by sector. Investment-grade corporate bonds gained 7.5% as the benefit of lower interest rates offset the negative impact of wider spreads.
38 |
Mortgage-backed securities and the broad Treasury market returned 6.1% and 6%, respectively. High yield bonds lagged the broad bond market, gaining 2.5% as spreads widened. Non-U.S. government bonds also underperformed the broad market, returning 1.1%, as the substantial appreciation of the U.S. Dollar offset gains from lower interest rates. Money market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very easy monetary policy.
Mortgage-Backed Market
During the period under review, the Fund had an average allocation to agency mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) of 54.9%, U.S. agency debt securities of 30.7%, Treasury securities of 6.1%, agency collateralized mortgage obligations of 2%, agency commercial MBS of 3.4%, and 2.9% in cash. Despite the decline in interest rates, agency MBS returns were in-line with comparably dated Treasury securities as investor demand for agency MBS far outweighed issuance. During the review period, the Fed began tapering its MBS purchases by $5 billion per month up until the end of October, bringing its aggressive bond purchase program to an end. The Fed remained the largest buyer of agency MBS, however, as it continued to reinvest principal pay-downs back into the MBS market. Mortgage lenders maintained tight credit, preferring borrowers with pristine credit. In addition to enjoying favorable supply/demand dynamics, the MBS sector offered investors a yield advantage over similar maturity Treasuries as the prepayment environment remained relatively muted for much of the period under review.
Within the MBS market, 30-year Ginnie Mae (“GNMA”) MBS returned 5.99% and 30-year Fannie Mae (“FNMA”) MBS returned 6.79%. This outperformance of FNMA MBS over their GNMA counterparts was due to declining relative issuance. Consequently, investors preferred FNMA securities due to their more favorable supply/ demand dynamics. Lower coupon agency MBS outperformed higher coupon agency MBS. Investors favored lower coupon agency MBS because they offered higher yields and were less sensitive to prepayments in the falling interest rate environment.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
The Fund underperformed its benchmark, the Citigroup Government and Mortgage Index, during the period under review. Broadly, the Fund’s shorter duration (duration is a measure of interest rate risk) had a negative impact on performance as longer-term interest rates decreased during the fiscal year. In particular, the Fund’s underperformance was driven by an underweight in lower coupon agency MBS and minimal exposure to Treasury securities with maturities 10 years and longer.
39 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
40 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,010.15 | $3.65 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,021.58 | $3.67 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .72%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid | |
during the period are net of expenses waived. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
41 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Government Fund and the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Government Fund beginning 12/31/04 with a theoretical investment in the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged index that is a combination of the Citigroup U.S. Government Index and the Citigroup Mortgage Index. The Citigroup U.S. Government Index tracks the performance of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored indices within the Citigroup U.S. Broad Investment Grade Bond Index. The Citigroup Mortgage Index tracks the performance of the mortgage component of the Citigroup U.S. Broad Investment Grade Bond Index, which is comprised of 30- and 15-year GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pass-throughs and FNMA and FHLMC balloon mortgages. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Average Annual Total Returns for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 2.98%, 2.38% and 3.51%, respectively.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
42 |
Portfolio of Investments
GOVERNMENT FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | ||||
SECURITIES—54.8% | ||||
Fannie Mae—31.1% | ||||
$1,163M | 2.5%, 9/1/2023 – 11/1/2023 | $ 1,196,956 | ||
1,301M | 3%, 7/1/2021 – 10/1/2027 | 1,355,880 | ||
2,780M | 3.5%, 11/1/2028 – 1/14/2045 (a) | 2,910,841 | ||
2,364M | 4%, 3/1/2029 – 8/1/2044 | 2,536,115 | ||
456M | 4.5%, 11/1/2040 – 8/1/2041 | 496,109 | ||
214M | 5%, 4/1/2040 | 237,410 | ||
545M | 5.5%, 7/1/2034 – 10/1/2039 | 615,512 | ||
172M | 9%, 11/1/2026 | 200,502 | ||
12M | 11%, 10/1/2015 | 12,445 | ||
9,561,770 | ||||
Freddie Mac—8.8% | ||||
744M | 3.5%, 11/1/2042 – 10/1/2044 | 775,865 | ||
1,477M | 4%, 11/1/2040 – 8/1/2044 | 1,582,333 | ||
317M | 4.5%, 5/1/2044 | 344,028 | ||
2,702,226 | ||||
Government National Mortgage Association I | ||||
Program—14.9% | ||||
776M | 4%, 11/15/2025 – 8/15/2041 | 832,312 | ||
1,508M | 4.5%, 12/15/2039 – 6/15/2040 | 1,663,615 | ||
1,432M | 5%, 6/15/2033 – 4/15/2040 | 1,595,901 | ||
237M | 5.5%, 2/15/2033 – 1/15/2036 | 267,145 | ||
182M | 6%, 11/15/2032 – 4/15/2036 | 209,682 | ||
4,568,655 | ||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $16,449,584) | 16,832,651 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | ||||
OBLIGATIONS—28.4% | ||||
Fannie Mae: | ||||
1,200M | 0.875%, 8/28/2017 | 1,196,278 | ||
500M | 0.875%, 5/21/2018 | 491,849 | ||
2,450M | 1.625%, 11/27/2018 | 2,462,725 | ||
125M | 1.75%, 11/26/2019 | 125,163 | ||
260M | 2.625%, 9/6/2024 | 263,644 | ||
1,000M | Federal Farm Credit Bank, 4.875%, 1/17/2017 | 1,082,421 |
43 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY OBLIGATIONS (continued) | |||||||
$1,250M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 5.375%, 5/18/2016 | $ 1,333,632 | |||||
Freddie Mac: | |||||||
800M | 0.875%, 3/7/2018 | 790,609 | |||||
1,000M | 1.25%, 8/1/2019 | 981,970 | |||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $8,954,072) | 8,728,291 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—6.9% | |||||||
228M | FDA Queens LP, 6.99%, 6/15/2017 (b) | 243,087 | |||||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | |||||||
555M | 2.25%, 7/31/2021 | 566,057 | |||||
1,280M | 2.375%, 8/15/2024 | 1,303,800 | |||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $2,101,742) | 2,112,944 | ||||||
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||||||
SECURITIES—3.4% | |||||||
Fannie Mae—1.7% | |||||||
500M | 3.84%, 5/1/2018 | 533,249 | |||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation—1.7% | |||||||
500M | Multi-Family Structured Pass Through, 2.13%, 1/25/2019 | 506,087 | |||||
Total Value of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $1,060,078) | 1,039,336 | ||||||
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—2.0% | |||||||
579M | Fannie Mae, 4%, 2/25/2025 (cost $623,760) | 627,658 | |||||
CORPORATE BONDS—1.3% | |||||||
426M | Excalibur One 77B, LLC, 1.492%, 1/1/2025 (cost $424,415) | 405,600 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $29,613,651) | 96.8 | % | 29,746,480 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 3.2 | 964,331 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $30,710,811 |
(a) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis |
(see Note 1G). | |
(b) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 5). |
44 |
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | $ | — | $ | 16,832,651 | $ | — | $ | 16,832,651 | ||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 8,728,291 | — | 8,728,291 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 2,112,944 | — | 2,112,944 | ||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 1,039,336 | — | 1,039,336 | ||||||||
Collateralized Mortgage | ||||||||||||
Obligations | 627,658 | — | 627,658 | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 405,600 | — | 405,600 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 29,746,480 | $ | — | $ | 29,746,480 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 45 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Life Growth & Income Fund for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 7.65%, including dividends of 53.1 cents per share and capital gains of 29.5 cents per share.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
During the year under review, equity performance was buoyed by solid data signaling a strengthening U.S. economy, healthy corporate earnings and a lack of attractive opportunities elsewhere in the globe. Domestic stocks continuously plumbed new highs to finish 2014 in solidly positive territory, largely in-line with consensus expectations of a more moderate performance than 2013’s meteoric market rise. Due to a number of factors, including oil and currency market turmoil, economic weakness in parts of the globe, and worries about Federal Reserve actions, volatility increased throughout the final months of the year, bringing a choppy, uneven cadence to the market’s trajectory. This uneven cadence represented the overall narrowing of the market rally’s breadth as the year progressed. The rally in the markets appeared more concentrated than before, as shares included in popular indexed strategies that are tracked by index funds and ETFs outperformed those that are not tied to market indicators. As such, many “secondary” stocks and smaller-cap names underperformed for the year.
This year’s market results were positive overall though, with all market sectors, styles and sizes participating. Companies with strong profitability, earnings growth, solid balance sheets and strong, free cash flows led results. Mergers and acquisitions also continued to drive strong performance. Small- and mid-cap stocks lagged their larger counterparts, as investors reacted to market uncertainty.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
These conditions were challenging for the Fund, leading it to underperform its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, which gained 13.7% over the review period. The Fund continued to invest across all market capitalization segments, allocating 73% of holdings to large-cap, 14% to mid-cap and 13% to small-cap stocks1 as of period end. The Fund sought to be fully invested throughout the year, maintaining minimal cash positions. The large-cap segment of the Fund had results that slightly exceeded the benchmark. While the mid-cap segments performed in-line, the smaller-cap part of the portfolio significantly underperformed on a relative and absolute basis. Relative results were impacted by the Fund’s stock selection within consumer staples and industrials, and from overall sector allocation decisions within utilities and financials relative to benchmark weightings.
Among portfolio highlights, in information technology, good stock selection and an overweighting of the sector added to strong relative performance for the year. Semiconductor manufacturer Avago Technologies had a very strong year, gaining
46 |
90% in 2014. The company benefited from strong quarterly results, completion of the accretive acquisition of competitor LSI, and from the company’s increased content on the very successful iPhone 6. Apple (a top 10 position) also had a strong year for the Fund as the stock was up over 37% in 2014. Solid earnings, a $30 billion increase in the share buyback, a 7 for 1 stock split, and a better-than-expected launch of the company’s new products drove the stock higher. Longtime holding Microsoft also produced positive returns for the Fund, as its shares were up 24% in 2014. The company hired a new CEO, announced a large cost-cutting plan, agreed to purchase an up-and-coming game developer, Mojang, and delivered strong results, as PC demand came in at higher than expected levels. Intel had a strong year in 2014, up almost 40% as the company benefited from the PC refresh cycle, delivered good results, and announced that it was going to split the company in two as a way to increase shareholder value.
In health care, the Fund benefitted from strong pharmaceutical and biotech performance. Actavis (a top 10 position) had a very strong year and was up 53% in 2014. The company reported strong results, announced and completed the acquisition of competitor Forest Laboratories in a highly accretive transaction, was approached by Pfizer as a potential M&A target, and announced the $69 billion acquisition of competitor Allergan. Gilead Sciences, the biopharmaceutical company, was up 25% in 2014, as the company delivered strong business results. The company also received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and strong initial orders for its blockbuster next-generation hepatitis C drug called Sovaldi, and follow-on Harvoni, in addition to numerous other drugs in the R&D pipeline that presented successful clinical trials.
The consumer discretionary sector also had a solid year. Top names were from the automotive components industry, as well as specialty retail. Shares of Harman International and Delphi Automotive rallied, as new technologies were being implemented in car electronics and center stack control modules, driving increased take rates and sales. Harman was up 30% and Delphi rallied 21%. Shares of auto component maker TRW Automotive rose 38% on receipt of a takeover offer from German company ZF Friedrichshafen.
Among negative contributors, the key disappointments for the year were within the consumer staples sector. Shares of health and beauty direct seller Nu Skin Enterprises fell 68% in the review period, driving the majority of the sector’s and the Fund’s underperformance. After seeing robust sales and profit growth in 2013, and being the Fund’s top performer, the company voluntarily halted recruitment of new distributors in China following a government regulator’s decision to look into Nu Skin’s recruiting and sales practices, after some negative articles appeared in the Chinese press. While the company was cleared to resume sales recruitment in China shortly thereafter, Nu Skin’s business results came in much lower than expected throughout the year, as the restart of sales recruiting took longer than expected. The company, in turn, issued a more conservative 2015 earnings outlook than Wall Street’s expectations. While there are significant new product introductions planned, they are not expected to contribute
47 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
until the second half of 2015. Herbalife, another direct seller, was also weak in 2014, down 52%. During the year, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission confirmed an investigation into the company’s business practices following short seller allegations that the company was operating an illegal pyramid scheme. Additionally, the company’s subsequent poor profits reports and disappointing earnings guidance pressured shares. The stock was sold out of the Fund’s portfolio during the year.
In industrials, the primary source of underperformance came from shares of NeuStar, an IT services company that provides local number portability services in the U.S., which was down 44% in 2014. Concerns about the company’s largest contract were confirmed as an advisory committee to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recommended that the contract be awarded to NeuStar’s competitor. This caused investors to fear that the company would lose the Local Number Portability Administration (LNPA) contract that makes up a material portion of the company’s sales and profits. Engineering and construction firm Chicago Bridge & Iron was also weak, as falling energy prices impacted the cadence of new contracts and slowed workflow from the energy and process industries business. Both companies’ shares were sold out of the Fund’s portfolio.
The utilities and financials sectors each had a strong year in an absolute sense in 2014. The Fund remained significantly underweight both sectors throughout the year, however, which led to relative underperformance. Utilities remain a challenging sector for the Fund to hold, as earnings growth is typically anemic and unaligned with the Fund’s objectives in seeking growth and income for investors. Shares in the sector tend to move on interest rate fluctuations, and benefitted from rates dropping in the fourth quarter. Financials also remain challenging, as increased regulatory scrutiny limit their abilities to grow or return capital to shareholders.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
1 Capitalization ranges defined by Lipper.
48 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,022.21 | $3.87 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,021.38 | $3.87 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .76%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
49 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Growth & Income Fund and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Growth & Income Fund beginning 12/31/04 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
50 |
Portfolio of Investments
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—99.7% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—15.0% | ||||
71,300 | BorgWarner, Inc. | $ 3,917,935 | ||
114,400 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 6,330,896 | ||
81,600 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 5,933,952 | ||
57,500 | Foot Locker, Inc. | 3,230,350 | ||
135,300 | Ford Motor Company | 2,097,150 | ||
36,400 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,709,344 | ||
40,700 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 4,343,097 | ||
48,200 | Home Depot, Inc. | 5,059,554 | ||
108,800 | * | Jarden Corporation | 5,209,344 | |
53,800 | L Brands, Inc. | 4,656,390 | ||
52,400 | Lear Corporation | 5,139,392 | ||
40,100 | Magna International, Inc. | 4,358,469 | ||
87,400 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 3,329,066 | ||
40,900 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 2,006,963 | ||
30,100 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 3,095,785 | |
52,800 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 3,326,400 | ||
43,500 | Walt Disney Company | 4,097,265 | ||
14,900 | Whirlpool Corporation | 2,886,726 | ||
37,700 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 3,233,152 | ||
73,961,230 | ||||
Consumer Staples—7.8% | ||||
120,300 | Altria Group, Inc. | 5,927,181 | ||
67,500 | Avon Products, Inc. | 633,825 | ||
97,078 | Coca-Cola Company | 4,098,633 | ||
73,000 | CVS Health Corporation | 7,030,630 | ||
94,900 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 4,147,130 | ||
44,400 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 4,198,464 | ||
74,300 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 6,051,735 | ||
28,400 | Procter & Gamble Company | 2,586,956 | ||
43,050 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 3,697,134 | ||
38,371,688 |
51 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy—8.6% | ||||
36,900 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | $ 3,044,250 | ||
38,700 | Chevron Corporation | 4,341,366 | ||
61,500 | ConocoPhillips | 4,247,190 | ||
65,700 | Devon Energy Corporation | 4,021,497 | ||
33,300 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 997,335 | ||
53,500 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 4,946,075 | ||
26,700 | Hess Corporation | 1,970,994 | ||
80,222 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 2,269,480 | ||
53,511 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 4,829,903 | ||
42,750 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 2,801,408 | ||
24,800 | Noble Corporation, PLC | 410,936 | ||
26,700 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 2,152,287 | ||
31,050 | Phillips 66 | 2,226,285 | ||
13,100 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 1,118,871 | ||
93,607 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 2,974,830 | ||
42,352,707 | ||||
Financials—11.1% | ||||
61,906 | American Express Company | 5,759,734 | ||
37,700 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 4,985,825 | ||
142,600 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 3,542,184 | ||
18,600 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 462,396 | ||
53,643 | Discover Financial Services | 3,513,080 | ||
27,100 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 670,183 | ||
50,600 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 362,296 | |
16,000 | iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (ETF) | 2,316,800 | ||
46,100 | iShares Russell 2000 ETF (ETF) | 5,516,787 | ||
106,088 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 6,638,987 | ||
15,200 | Morgan Stanley | 589,760 | ||
40,500 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 3,694,815 | ||
15,700 | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (ETF) | 3,226,350 | ||
27,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 1,098,900 | ||
145,379 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 2,400,207 | ||
96,100 | U.S. Bancorp | 4,319,695 | ||
104,800 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 2,293,024 | ||
63,967 | Wells Fargo & Company | 3,506,671 | ||
54,897,694 |
52 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Health Care—18.3% | ||||
107,800 | Abbott Laboratories | $ 4,853,156 | ||
90,300 | AbbVie, Inc. | 5,909,232 | ||
39,300 | * | Actavis, PLC | 10,116,213 | |
47,530 | Baxter International, Inc. | 3,483,474 | ||
42,900 | Covidien, PLC | 4,387,812 | ||
53,822 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 4,557,109 | |
140,400 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 13,234,104 | |
73,075 | Johnson & Johnson | 7,641,453 | ||
2,612 | * | Mallinckrodt, PLC | 258,666 | |
19,300 | McKesson Corporation | 4,006,294 | ||
87,443 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 4,965,888 | ||
88,700 | * | Mylan, Inc. | 5,000,019 | |
49,600 | Omnicare, Inc. | 3,617,328 | ||
222,993 | Pfizer, Inc. | 6,946,232 | ||
45,900 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 1,448,145 | ||
69,543 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 8,713,042 | ||
28,072 | Zoetis, Inc. | 1,207,938 | ||
90,346,105 | ||||
Industrials—12.3% | ||||
43,194 | 3M Company | 7,097,638 | ||
121,600 | ADT Corporation | 4,405,568 | ||
68,800 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 1,953,232 | ||
24,400 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 1,247,328 | |
20,700 | Caterpillar, Inc. | 1,894,671 | ||
17,600 | Dover Corporation | 1,262,272 | ||
69,000 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 3,226,440 | |
104,196 | General Electric Company | 2,633,033 | ||
63,200 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 3,395,736 | ||
56,900 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 5,685,448 | ||
61,300 | ITT Corporation | 2,480,198 | ||
5,600 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 1,078,392 | ||
47,100 | Ryder System, Inc. | 4,373,235 | ||
24,300 | Snap-On, Inc. | 3,322,782 | ||
33,500 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 1,459,595 | |
29,800 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 1,022,736 | ||
95,800 | Textron, Inc. | 4,034,138 | ||
74,000 | Tyco International, PLC | 3,245,640 | ||
21,400 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 2,183,014 | |
41,600 | United Technologies Corporation | 4,784,000 | ||
60,785,096 |
53 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | |
Information Technology—20.2% | |||
93,600 | Apple, Inc. | $ 10,331,568 | |
86,900 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 2,623,511 |
59,100 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 5,944,869 | |
37,200 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 1,443,360 |
89,825 | CDW Corporation | 3,159,145 | |
233,900 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 6,505,930 | |
26,900 | * | eBay, Inc. | 1,509,628 |
228,100 | EMC Corporation | 6,783,694 | |
127,000 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 5,096,510 | |
156,100 | Intel Corporation | 5,664,869 | |
41,000 | International Business Machines Corporation | 6,578,040 | |
134,600 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 3,004,272 | |
167,100 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 3,662,832 | |
112,200 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 4,096,422 | |
167,100 | Microsoft Corporation | 7,761,795 | |
62,900 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 4,805,560 |
94,100 | Oracle Corporation | 4,231,677 | |
48,300 | * | PTC, Inc. | 1,770,195 |
67,288 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 5,001,517 | |
121,760 | Symantec Corporation | 3,123,753 | |
34,600 | * | Synaptics, Inc. | 2,381,864 |
46,800 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 2,960,100 | |
20,000 | * | Yahoo!, Inc. | 1,010,200 |
99,451,311 | |||
Materials—3.6% | |||
53,800 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 2,483,946 | |
118,940 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 2,778,438 | |
33,100 | H.B. Fuller Company | 1,473,943 | |
54,800 | International Paper Company | 2,936,184 | |
42,900 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 3,405,831 | |
10,900 | Praxair, Inc. | 1,412,204 | |
36,350 | RPM International, Inc. | 1,843,309 | |
80,200 | * | Trinseo SA | 1,399,490 |
17,733,345 | |||
Telecommunication Services—2.0% | |||
127,000 | AT&T, Inc. | 4,265,930 | |
113,700 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 5,318,886 | |
9,584,816 |
54 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Utilities—.8% | |||||||
64,500 | * | Dynegy, Inc. | $ 1,957,575 | ||||
40,400 | NiSource, Inc. | 1,713,768 | |||||
3,671,343 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $284,923,223) | 99.7 | % | 491,155,335 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .3 | 1,441,270 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $492,596,605 |
* | Non-income producing | |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
55 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
December 31, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks* | $ | 491,155,335 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 491,155,335 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
56 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Life International Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 2.39%, including dividends of 23.2 cents per share.
Market Summary
In 2014, the U.S. equity market posted solid returns, while Europe and emerging markets declined. While the U.S. stock market fell sharply in October and again in December, its quick rebound in both months signified its underlying economic strength as it enters 2015 with strong momentum. The U.S. Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) is likely to raise rates in 2015 as the economy moves into a more mature stage of recovery. In Europe, however, weak growth and the continued threat of deflation suggest that monetary policy is headed in the opposite direction. Europe continued to struggle throughout the review period as disappointing economic data was released and the European Central Bank lowered its growth forecasts for the Eurozone economy. Falling commodity prices and a strengthening U.S. Dollar drove emerging markets to negative territory over the year. Low energy prices and economic contraction continue to fuel concerns about the potential for a full-blown financial crisis in Russia, despite somewhat improved stability in the ruble and local markets at the end of the review period. In Brazil, equities declined sharply in 2014 as investors faced a number of developments, including the re-election of President Dilma Rousseff, soft commodity prices, elevated inflation pressures, a weak currency, and the escalating Petrobras scandal.
Volatility is likely to increase across both developed and emerging markets in 2015. As the investment environment becomes more challenging, careful stock selection is critical. We focus on identifying companies with characteristics that can provide resilience to macro shocks, such as robust cash flow, a consumer focus and a strong competitive position. As bottom-up, fundamental investors, we look to benefit from the long-term compounding of earnings growth of our investment companies.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
We are pleased to report that the Fund significantly outperformed its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index, which fell 4.90% against the Fund’s 2.39% gain, over the review period.
On a sector basis, the Financials and Consumer Staples sectors were the largest contributors to relative performance, primarily supported by stock selection. The Industrials sector detracted from relative returns, mainly driven by stock selection. The portfolio’s underweight to Utilities also detracted from returns. The following
57 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
discussion highlights specific stocks — those that provided the largest contribution to absolute performance and those that were the largest detractors for the fiscal year. As bottom-up stock pickers, we hope that you find this useful and gain a greater understanding of how we invest.
Stocks that Helped Absolute Performance
Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC) is a diversified financial services company in India with a leading mortgage finance franchise. It reported solid results for the second quarter fiscal year 2015; earnings were in-line with estimates and loan growth was encouraging. HDFC is well-placed for long-term growth, as it is the leader in mortgage lending in India, with margins supported by industry-leading low costs. The company also provides home loans, deposit products and lease finance facilities to the corporate sector. The company has been around since 1977 and is usually considered a “gold standard” in terms of corporate governance and risk management.
HDFC Bank reported solid results for the second quarter fiscal year 2015; earnings were solid and retail loan growth was encouraging. HDFC Bank is a high-quality Indian private sector bank, which has been a cornerstone investment in the portfolio for many years. It is the largest privately owned retail bank in India, with a network of over 3,400 branches nationwide. The bank has delivered solid growth while maintaining high credit and underwriting standards. HDFC Bank has a strong deposit franchise and powerful technology backbone that has allowed it to significantly grow earnings over the past 10 years.
Stocks that Hurt Absolute Performance
Core Laboratories’ price declined over the review period due to the sharp fall in the price of oil, which has weighed on all companies in the sector. There is a real risk that investment gets delayed. The reason we continue to hold Core Laboratories in this environment is that it is unique in the oil services field. The company focuses on niches within oil services where it can be a leader and where returns are extremely high. The company focuses on helping customers extract the most amount of oil from their fields. In doing so, Core Laboratories provides its customers returns on investment so attractive that, even in downturns, there should still be demand for the company’s products, albeit at a lower level. The company has best-in-class return on invested capital, as its capex is client led, meaning the company invests only in response to customer needs. We believe Core Laboratories can continue to post industry-leading returns and will reward shareholders over time despite the current environment for oil.
Sands China, as well as other Macau-exposed gaming stocks, underperformed this year due to weak monthly gross gaming revenue (GGR) numbers in the market. This
58 |
slowdown was not unexpected. In hindsight, however, the magnitude of the market contraction has admittedly been more severe than anticipated. While the ongoing corruption crackdown in China has weighed heavily on the VIP segment of the Macau gaming pie, it should be a positive for Macau longer-term as it should be beneficial for operators that we believe are above board in their operations and well-positioned for the real prize, the growth in mass and premium mass gamblers.
In addition, the gaming market in Macau has continued to suffer from a constraint on supply, as there have been no material capacity additions to the market in nearly two years now. The middle of 2015, with the opening of Galaxy Entertainment’s Phase 2 expansion and Melco-Crown’s new City of Dreams property, should serve as a catalyst to begin to calm the fears around the Macau stocks.
In the meantime the VIP segment, as well as mass gambling results, will continue to be soft. Consensus expectations for 2015 and 2016 across the board for the stocks have been materially cut over the last six months, with one of the biggest and last remaining bulls on the street cutting their numbers materially in December. We still remain bullish, however, on the long-term investment prospects for these businesses, despite the immediate headwinds to next year’s results. While we have not added materially to our exposure given the reality of a continuing soft trading environment, we have a sharp eye towards, at minimum, maintaining our investment size on weakness, with the potential to increase the position further should market sentiment continue to deviate materially from the medium- and long-term investment prospects for Las Vegas Sands. We also continue to closely follow some of the other Macau operators’ stocks.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
59 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $950.40 | $4.47 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,020.62 | $4.63 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .91%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
60 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series International Fund, the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Gross) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Net).
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series International Fund beginning 12/31/04 with theoretical investments in the MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) and the MSCI EAFE Index (Net) (the “Indices”). The Indices are free float-adjusted market capitalization indices that measure developed foreign market equity performance, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) is calculated on a total-return basis with the maximum possible dividend reinvestment (before taxes). The MSCI EAFE Index (Net) is calculated on a total-return basis with net dividends reinvested after deduction of foreign withholding taxes. The Indices are unmanaged and it is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Indices figures are from Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
61 |
Portfolio of Investments
INTERNATIONAL FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—98.9% | ||||
United Kingdom—18.0% | ||||
147,922 | British American Tobacco, PLC | $ 8,016,049 | ||
114,871 | Diageo, PLC | 3,290,725 | ||
139,159 | Domino’s Pizza Group, PLC | 1,519,394 | ||
78,491 | * | Persimmon, PLC | 1,917,060 | |
61,904 | Reckitt Benckiser Group, PLC | 5,013,857 | ||
75,791 | SABMiller, PLC | 3,951,081 | ||
23,708,166 | ||||
Switzerland—15.4% | ||||
411 | Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG | 2,032,177 | ||
29,637 | Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA | 2,627,576 | ||
17,637 | DKSH Holding, Ltd. | 1,342,690 | ||
76,139 | Nestle SA – Registered | 5,550,610 | ||
21,856 | Roche Holding AG – Genusscheine | 5,921,713 | ||
1,373 | SGS SA – Registered | 2,803,625 | ||
20,278,391 | ||||
India—12.4% | ||||
347,035 | HDFC Bank, Ltd. | 5,212,016 | ||
84,058 | Hindustan Unilever, Ltd. | 1,010,175 | ||
360,138 | Housing Development Finance Corporation | 6,458,123 | ||
618,690 | ITC, Ltd. | 3,604,097 | ||
16,284,411 | ||||
France—8.5% | ||||
14,605 | Air Liquide SA | 1,807,223 | ||
102,237 | Bureau Veritas SA | 2,265,164 | ||
20,866 | Essilor International SA | 2,326,968 | ||
4,622 | Hermes International | 1,645,818 | ||
11,069 | L’Oreal SA | 1,852,644 | ||
11,137 | Pernod Ricard SA | 1,237,743 | ||
11,135,560 |
62 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
United States—7.0% | ||||
77,793 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | $ 6,336,240 | ||
2,561 | * | Priceline.com, Inc. | 2,920,078 | |
9,256,318 | ||||
Canada—6.8% | ||||
48,185 | Alimentation Couche-Tard – Class “B” | 2,018,146 | ||
42,500 | Bank of Nova Scotia | 2,426,429 | ||
60,994 | Enbridge, Inc. | 3,136,849 | ||
26,672 | Shaw Communications, Inc. – Class “B” | 719,946 | ||
28,851 | Silver Wheaton Corporation | 586,804 | ||
8,888,174 | ||||
Netherlands—5.2% | ||||
11,793 | Core Laboratories NV | 1,419,170 | ||
138,351 | Unilever NV-CVA | 5,411,992 | ||
6,831,162 | ||||
China—4.3% | ||||
14,719 | * | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd. (ADR) | 1,529,893 | |
11,400 | * | Baidu, Inc. (ADR) | 2,598,858 | |
107,165 | Tencent Holdings, Ltd. | 1,550,563 | ||
5,679,314 | ||||
Hong Kong—4.3% | ||||
100,251 | Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings, Ltd. | 737,222 | ||
198,326 | Galaxy Entertainment Group, Ltd. | 1,102,041 | ||
297,986 | Link REIT (REIT) | 1,865,619 | ||
388,991 | Sands China, Ltd. | 1,893,665 | ||
5,598,547 | ||||
Australia—4.1% | ||||
41,571 | CSL, Ltd. | 2,920,185 | ||
52,014 | Ramsay Health Care, Ltd. | 2,411,275 | ||
5,331,460 | ||||
Denmark—3.5% | ||||
9,639 | Coloplast A/S – Series “B” | 806,635 | ||
88,496 | Novo Nordisk A/S – Series “B” | 3,743,362 | ||
4,549,997 |
63 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Brazil—3.0% | |||||||
99,340 | Cielo SA | $ 1,557,256 | |||||
180,614 | Itau Unibanco Holding SA (ADR) | 2,349,788 | |||||
3,907,044 | |||||||
Spain—1.5% | |||||||
48,300 | Grifols SA | 1,927,346 | |||||
South Africa—1.4% | |||||||
14,126 | Naspers, Ltd. | 1,827,272 | |||||
Japan—1.3% | |||||||
14,900 | Daito Trust Construction Company, Ltd. | 1,690,224 | |||||
Ireland—1.2% | |||||||
18,453 | Paddy Power, PLC | 1,538,699 | |||||
Germany—1.0% | |||||||
9,578 | Bayer AG | 1,305,566 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $95,445,397) | 129,737,651 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—.7% | |||||||
United States | |||||||
$1,000M | Fannie Mae, 0.02%, 1/20/2015 (cost $999,989) | 999,989 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $96,445,386) | 99.6 | % | 130,737,640 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .4 | 536,066 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $131,273,706 |
* | Non-income producing | |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
64 |
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | $ | — | $ | 23,708,166 | $ | — | $ | 23,708,166 | ||||
Switzerland | — | 20,278,391 | — | 20,278,391 | ||||||||
India | — | 16,284,411 | — | 16,284,411 | ||||||||
France | — | 11,135,560 | — | 11,135,560 | ||||||||
United States | 9,256,318 | — | — | 9,256,318 | ||||||||
Canada | 8,888,174 | — | — | 8,888,174 | ||||||||
Netherlands | 1,419,170 | 5,411,992 | — | 6,831,162 | ||||||||
China | 4,128,751 | 1,550,563 | — | 5,679,314 | ||||||||
Hong Kong | — | 5,598,547 | — | 5,598,547 | ||||||||
Australia | — | 5,331,460 | — | 5,331,460 | ||||||||
Denmark | — | 4,549,997 | — | 4,549,997 | ||||||||
Brazil | 2,349,788 | 1,557,256 | — | 3,907,044 | ||||||||
Spain | — | 1,927,346 | — | 1,927,346 | ||||||||
South Africa | — | 1,827,272 | — | 1,827,272 | ||||||||
Japan | — | 1,690,224 | — | 1,690,224 | ||||||||
Ireland | — | 1,538,699 | — | 1,538,699 | ||||||||
Germany | — | 1,305,566 | — | 1,305,566 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 999,989 | — | 999,989 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 26,042,201 | $ | 104,695,439 | * | $ | — | $ | 130,737,640 |
* | Includes certain foreign securities that were fair valued due to fluctuation in U.S. securities markets |
exceeding a predetermined level or a foreign market being closed; therefore, $103,695,450 of investment | |
securities were classified as Level 2 instead of Level 1. |
65 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
December 31, 2014
Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 securities as of December 31, 2014 resulted from securities priced previously with an official close price (Level 1 securities) or on days where there is not an official close price the mean price used (Level 2 securities). Transfers from Level 1 to Level 2 as of December 31, 2014 were $68,026,917. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
The following is a reconciliation of Fund investments valued using Level 3 inputs for the year:
Investments | ||||||||||||
in Common | ||||||||||||
Stocks | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2013 | $ | 18,264 | ||||||||||
Purchases | — | |||||||||||
Sales | (18,133) | |||||||||||
Change in unrealized | ||||||||||||
depreciation | (18,264) | |||||||||||
Realized gain | 18,133 | |||||||||||
Transfer into Level 3 | — | |||||||||||
Transfer out of Level 3 | — | |||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2014 | $ | — |
66 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Dear Investor:
We’re pleased to send you the First Investors Life Investment Grade Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.86%, including dividends of 46.0 cents per share.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy grew at approximately 2.5% during 2014, with growth accelerating in the second half of the year. Of note, the unemployment rate fell from 6.7% to 5.6%, its lowest level since 2008, as the economy created the most jobs in fifteen years. This good news was tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate (i.e., the percent of the population participating in the labor force) and anemic wage growth. Inflation was subdued with consumer prices increasing only 0.8%, compared to 1.5% in 2013, in part due to the decline in energy prices during the fourth quarter.
The improvement in the economy and labor market allowed the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) to conclude its bond buying program — part of its effort to stimulate growth by lowering interest rates — in October. As well, the Fed remained on course to begin raising the federal funds rate in the second half of 2015, although low inflation (below the Fed’s 2% target) and international developments could delay rate hikes.
Long-term U.S. interest rates moved sharply lower throughout the review period, despite a strong consensus at the beginning of the year that rates would continue to rise. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors: slower than expected global growth (especially in Europe), very low foreign interest rates, geopolitical events (e.g., Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS, Ebola) that supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, investors’ belief that the upcoming Fed tightening cycle would be more limited than in the past, and deflationary fears which were exacerbated by the collapse in oil prices. For the year, the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield fell from 3.03%, a two-and-a-half year high, to 2.17%.
The broad U.S. bond market returned 6.3% during the review period, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. In particular, long-term bonds had very strong returns as interest rates fell and bond prices rose (interest rates, or yields, and bond prices have an inverse relationship; bond prices rise as interest rates fall). Notably, Treasury securities with maturities longer than ten years gained over 24%.
Returns varied by sector. Investment-grade corporate bonds gained 7.5% as the benefit of lower interest rates offset the negative impact of wider spreads. Mortgage-backed securities and the broad Treasury market returned 6.1% and 6%, respectively. High yield bonds lagged the broad bond market, gaining 2.5% returns as spreads widened. Non-U.S. government bonds also underperformed the broad market, returning 1.1%, as the substantial appreciation of the U.S. Dollar offset gains from lower interest rates. Money market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very easy monetary policy.
67 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Corporate Bond Market
The corporate bond market began the review period on a firm note with corporate spreads tightening as Treasury yields began to fall. Very strong technicals helped support the market as a wave of new issue supply met an upsurge in demand for investment-grade corporate debt. In the second half of 2014, however, corporate spreads began to widen as volatility increased in the market. In particular, with the 50% drop in the price of oil, many non-financial sectors began to experience pronounced weakness. Less volatile sectors became safe havens for corporate bond investors as riskier assets traded with greater volatility. The market was also pressured later in the year by record new issue supply as corporations took advantage of very low interest rates to issue debt.
The corporate bond market returned 7.5%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. The positive returns of the corporate bond market during the review period were predominantly a result of duration (a measurement of interest rate risk) and Treasury yield curve movement. Of note, corporate bonds with maturities greater than 10 years returned 16.5%, reflecting the substantial move lower in long-term bond yields.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
The Fund invests in investment-grade fixed income securities. The majority of the Fund’s assets were invested in investment-grade corporate bonds.
The Fund underperformed its benchmark, the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Index, during the review period. The relative performance was predominantly a function of the Fund’s positioning for higher interest rates. Specifically, the Fund was negatively impacted by its underweight in corporate bonds with maturities greater than 10 years, which significantly outperformed shorter-dated corporate bonds.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
68 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,011.74 | $3.40 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,021.83 | $3.41 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .67%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid | |
during the period are net of expenses waived. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
69 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Investment Grade Fund and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Investment Grade Fund beginning 12/31/04 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index (the “Index”). The Index includes publicly-issued, fixed-rate, non-convertible investment grade dollar-denominated, S.E.C.-registered corporate debt having at least one year to maturity and an outstanding par value of at least $250 million. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Average Annual Total Returns for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 5.70%, 6.12% and 4.73%, respectively.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
70 |
Portfolio of Investments
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
CORPORATE BONDS—96.8% | ||||
Agriculture—.7% | ||||
$ 400M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 11/27/2017 (a) | $ 447,292 | ||
Automotive—1.2% | ||||
200M | Daimler Finance NA, LLC, 2.95%, 1/11/2017 (a) | 206,393 | ||
500M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 549,365 | ||
755,758 | ||||
Chemicals—2.5% | ||||
450M | CF Industries, Inc., 3.45%, 6/1/2023 | 440,690 | ||
500M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 535,957 | ||
500M | LyondellBasell Industries NV, 6%, 11/15/2021 | 576,302 | ||
1,552,949 | ||||
Consumer Durables—.5% | ||||
265M | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 8/15/2020 | 285,398 | ||
Energy—9.2% | ||||
575M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 5/15/2019 (a) | 622,601 | ||
500M | Continental Resources, Inc., 5%, 9/15/2022 | 484,375 | ||
400M | DCP Midstream Operating, LP, 2.5%, 12/1/2017 | 399,818 | ||
400M | DCP Midstream, LLC, 9.75%, 3/15/2019 (a) | 500,768 | ||
500M | Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, 4.2%, 9/15/2021 | 523,013 | ||
500M | Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP, 3.45%, 2/15/2023 | 479,465 | ||
500M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 6.15%, 2/15/2018 | 521,151 | ||
400M | ONEOK Partners, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2022 | 370,884 | ||
500M | Petrobras International Finance Co., 5.375%, 1/27/2021 | 465,785 | ||
400M | Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, 6.2%, 4/15/2018 | 444,796 | ||
466M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 3/15/2019 | 581,684 | ||
400M | Weatherford International, Inc., 6.35%, 6/15/2017 | 427,842 | ||
5,822,182 | ||||
Financial Services—16.9% | ||||
250M | Aflac, Inc., 8.5%, 5/15/2019 | 312,724 | ||
American Express Co.: | ||||
400M | 7%, 3/19/2018 | 463,119 | ||
200M | 4.05%, 12/3/2042 | 202,660 | ||
American International Group, Inc.: | ||||
300M | 5.85%, 1/16/2018 | 335,666 | ||
300M | 6.4%, 12/15/2020 | 358,193 | ||
500M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 566,450 |
71 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Financial Services (continued) | ||||
$ 600M | Assured Guaranty US Holding, Inc., 5%, 7/1/2024 | $ 633,683 | ||
400M | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 3.4%, 1/31/2022 | 417,143 | ||
200M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 12/10/2019 | 226,366 | ||
400M | CoBank ACB, 7.875%, 4/16/2018 (a) | 470,142 | ||
300M | Compass Bank, 6.4%, 10/1/2017 | 328,062 | ||
ERAC USA Finance, LLC: | ||||
500M | 4.5%, 8/16/2021 (a) | 535,397 | ||
500M | 7%, 10/15/2037 (a) | 675,989 | ||
600M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 8.125%, 1/15/2020 | 743,987 | ||
General Electric Capital Corp.: | ||||
1,000M | 5.3%, 2/11/2021 | 1,142,892 | ||
900M | 6.75%, 3/15/2032 | 1,232,756 | ||
300M | Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc., 2.4%, 9/15/2019 (a) | 300,311 | ||
200M | Harley-Davidson Funding Corp., 6.8%, 6/15/2018 (a) | 232,078 | ||
400M | Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 433,416 | ||
600M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 10/15/2019 | 722,782 | ||
300M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 360,995 | ||
10,694,811 | ||||
Financials—20.8% | ||||
Bank of America Corp.: | ||||
350M | 5.65%, 5/1/2018 | 389,138 | ||
625M | 5%, 5/13/2021 | 698,366 | ||
475M | 5.875%, 2/7/2042 | 596,622 | ||
Barclays Bank, PLC: | ||||
400M | 5.125%, 1/8/2020 | 448,993 | ||
600M | 3.75%, 5/15/2024 | 619,669 | ||
Citigroup, Inc.: | ||||
1,250M | 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 1,394,784 | ||
200M | 4.5%, 1/14/2022 | 218,883 | ||
400M | Deutsche Bank AG London, 3.7%, 5/30/2024 | 406,709 | ||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | ||||
200M | 5.375%, 3/15/2020 | 224,293 | ||
600M | 5.75%, 1/24/2022 | 694,687 | ||
300M | 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 304,314 | ||
500M | 6.125%, 2/15/2033 | 614,643 | ||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | ||||
900M | 6%, 1/15/2018 | 1,007,377 | ||
400M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | 437,364 |
72 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Financials (continued) | ||||
Morgan Stanley: | ||||
$ 500M | 5.95%, 12/28/2017 | $ 555,959 | ||
600M | 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 683,926 | ||
850M | 5.5%, 7/28/2021 | 965,994 | ||
600M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 665,542 | ||
400M | UBS AG, 4.875%, 8/4/2020 | 445,414 | ||
500M | U.S. Bancorp., 3.6%, 9/11/2024 | 508,784 | ||
Wells Fargo & Co.: | ||||
300M | 4.6%, 4/1/2021 | 334,254 | ||
900M | 3.45%, 2/13/2023 | 913,108 | ||
13,128,823 | ||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—7.2% | ||||
500M | Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 11/10/2018 | 635,433 | ||
500M | Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, 4.625%, 2/1/2044 | 546,082 | ||
200M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/2019 | 240,967 | ||
550M | Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 675,331 | ||
700M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/2018 | 808,275 | ||
300M | Ingredion, Inc., 4.625%, 11/1/2020 | 323,589 | ||
400M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 5.65%, 5/16/2018 | 451,000 | ||
SABMiller Holdings, Inc.: | ||||
400M | 3.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 418,128 | ||
400M | 4.95%, 1/15/2042 (a) | 452,359 | ||
4,551,164 | ||||
Forest Products/Container—.8% | ||||
500M | Rock-Tenn Co., 4.9%, 3/1/2022 | 537,908 | ||
Health Care—4.3% | ||||
400M | Biogen IDEC, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2018 | 461,306 | ||
Express Scripts Holding Co.: | ||||
450M | 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 497,331 | ||
200M | 3.5%, 6/15/2024 | 199,696 | ||
400M | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, 3.75%, 8/23/2022 | 409,890 | ||
400M | Mylan, Inc., 3.125%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 387,431 | ||
400M | Novartis Capital Corp., 4.4%, 5/6/2044 | 450,185 | ||
200M | Novartis Securities Investments, Ltd., 5.125%, 2/10/2019 | 224,776 | ||
58M | Roche Holdings, Inc., 6%, 3/1/2019 (a) | 67,052 | ||
2,697,667 |
73 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology—1.7% | ||||
$ 400M | Harris Corp., 4.4%, 12/15/2020 | $ 427,674 | ||
200M | Pitney Bowes, Inc., 5.75%, 9/15/2017 | 219,008 | ||
400M | Symantec Corp., 3.95%, 6/15/2022 | 403,153 | ||
1,049,835 | ||||
Manufacturing—3.0% | ||||
750M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | 898,307 | ||
400M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 464,724 | ||
500M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 563,173 | ||
1,926,204 | ||||
Media-Broadcasting—4.0% | ||||
200M | ABC, Inc., 8.75%, 8/15/2021 | 268,266 | ||
400M | British Sky Broadcasting Group, PLC, 9.5%, 11/15/2018 (a) | 502,910 | ||
350M | CBS Corp., 3.375%, 3/1/2022 | 352,063 | ||
500M | Comcast Corp., 4.25%, 1/15/2033 | 531,148 | ||
400M | DirecTV Holdings, LLC, 3.8%, 3/15/2022 | 407,585 | ||
400M | Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5%, 2/1/2020 | 441,291 | ||
2,503,263 | ||||
Media-Diversified—1.4% | ||||
McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc.: | ||||
620M | 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | 674,148 | ||
200M | 6.55%, 11/15/2037 | 217,759 | ||
891,907 | ||||
Metals/Mining—4.7% | ||||
500M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 562,852 | ||
400M | ArcelorMittal, 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | 427,500 | ||
400M | Glencore Finance Canada, Ltd., 4.95%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 422,605 | ||
500M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 536,386 | ||
500M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/2021 | 514,660 | ||
500M | Vale Overseas, Ltd., 5.625%, 9/15/2019 | 534,510 | ||
2,998,513 | ||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—4.5% | ||||
400M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | 458,654 | ||
450M | Digital Realty Trust, LP, 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 493,504 | ||
400M | HCP, Inc., 5.375%, 2/1/2021 | 447,246 |
74 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Real Estate Investment Trusts (continued) | ||||
ProLogis, LP: | ||||
$ 300M | 4.5%, 8/15/2017 | $ 319,882 | ||
200M | 3.35%, 2/1/2021 | 202,952 | ||
500M | Simon Property Group, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2024 | 509,612 | ||
400M | Ventas Realty, LP, 4.75%, 6/1/2021 | 435,341 | ||
2,867,191 | ||||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.5% | ||||
600M | GAP, Inc., 5.95%, 4/12/2021 | 683,710 | ||
200M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 262,087 | ||
945,797 | ||||
Telecommunications—1.5% | ||||
400M | AT&T, Inc., 6.5%, 9/1/2037 | 495,778 | ||
400M | Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.15%, 9/15/2023 | 442,006 | ||
937,784 | ||||
Transportation—2.7% | ||||
400M | Burlington North Santa Fe, LLC, 5.15%, 9/1/2043 | 463,066 | ||
400M | Con-way, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/2018 | 454,882 | ||
440M | GATX Corp., 4.75%, 6/15/2022 | 484,609 | ||
300M | Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, 4.875%, 7/11/2022 (a) | 323,676 | ||
1,726,233 | ||||
Utilities—7.7% | ||||
300M | Duke Energy Progress, Inc., 4.15%, 12/1/2044 | 320,296 | ||
300M | E.ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 4/30/2018 (a) | 334,840 | ||
200M | Electricite de France SA, 6.5%, 1/26/2019 (a) | 234,305 | ||
300M | Entergy Arkansas, Inc., 4.95%, 12/15/2044 | 314,427 | ||
400M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 5.2%, 10/1/2019 | 442,476 | ||
Great River Energy Co.: | ||||
66M | 5.829%, 7/1/2017 (a) | 70,480 | ||
280M | 4.478%, 7/1/2030 (a) | 303,179 | ||
600M | National Fuel Gas Co., 8.75%, 5/1/2019 | 742,044 | ||
450M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 521,299 |
75 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Utilities (continued) | |||||||
$ 450M | Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 4%, 12/15/2044 | $ 457,853 | |||||
400M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 514,092 | |||||
500M | South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., 5.45%, 2/1/2041 | 618,503 | |||||
4,873,794 | |||||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $58,393,539) | 96.8 | % | 61,194,473 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 3.2 | 2,008,243 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $63,202,716 |
(a) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 5). |
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds* | $ | — | $ | 61,194,473 | $ | — | $ | 61,194,473 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for corporate bonds. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
76 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
Dear Investor:
We’re pleased to send you the First Investors Life Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 20141. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –2.60% and did not make any distributions.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy grew at approximately 2.5% during 2014, with growth accelerating in the second half of the year. Of note, the unemployment rate fell from 6.7% to 5.6%, its lowest level since 2008, as the economy created the most jobs in fifteen years. This good news was tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate (i.e., the percentage of the population participating in the labor force) and anemic wage growth. Inflation was subdued with consumer prices increasing only 0.8%, compared to 1.5% in 2013, in part due to the decline in energy prices during the fourth quarter.
The improvement in the economy and labor market allowed the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) to conclude its bond buying program — part of its effort to stimulate growth by lowering interest rates — in October. As well, the Fed remained on course to begin raising the federal funds rate in the second half of 2015, although low inflation (below the Fed’s 2% target) and international developments could delay rate hikes.
Long-term U.S. interest rates moved sharply lower throughout the review period, despite a strong consensus at the beginning of the year that rates would continue to rise. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors: slower than expected global growth (especially in Europe), very low foreign interest rates, geopolitical events (e.g. Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS, Ebola) that supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, investors’ belief that the upcoming Fed tightening cycle would be more limited than in the past, and deflationary fears which were exacerbated by the collapse in oil prices. For the year, the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield fell from 3.03%, a two-and-a-half year high, to 2.17%.
The broad U.S. bond market returned 6.3% during the review period, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. In particular, long-term bonds had very strong returns as interest rates fell and bond prices rose (interest rates, or yields, and bond prices have an inverse relationship; bond prices rise as interest rates fall). Notably, Treasury securities with maturities longer than ten years gained over 24%.
Returns varied by sector. Investment-grade corporate bonds gained 7.5% as the benefit of lower interest rates offset the negative impact of wider spreads. Mortgage-backed securities and the broad Treasury market returned 6.1% and 6%, respectively. High yield bonds lagged the broad bond market, gaining 2.5% as spreads widened. Non-U.S. government bonds also underperformed the broad market, returning 1.1%, as the substantial appreciation of the U.S. Dollar offset gains from lower interest rates. Money
77 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very easy monetary policy.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
The Fund invests in investment-grade fixed income securities. The majority of the Fund’s assets were invested in investment-grade corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and U.S. Government securities. The Fund seeks to maintain an average duration of between two and six years.
Since the Fund was incepted on July 1, 2014, it does not have a full year of performance to compare with its benchmark, the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 1–5 Year Broad Market Index, for the review period. The Fund underperformed the Index when compared over the period since the Fund’s inception. Relative performance was predominantly a function of asset allocation and Treasury yield curve movements. Specifically, the Fund’s overweight in shorter duration corporate bonds negatively impacted performance. This was partially offset by the Fund’s overweight in mortgage-backed securities, which had the highest returns relative to other fixed income sectors the Fund invested in during the review period.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
1 The Fund’s performance and the performance of its benchmark are since July 1, 2014, the date the Fund commenced operations.
78 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14)* | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)** | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $974.00 | $28.96 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $995.87 | $29.28 |
* | Commencement of operations. |
** | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 5.82%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid | |
during the period are net of expenses waived. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
79 |
Portfolio of Investments
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares or | ||||
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS—41.7% | ||||
Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund | ||||
13,420 | Vanguard S/T Corporation Bond ETF (ETF) (cost $1,074,965) | $ 1,068,635 | ||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—17.6% | ||||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | ||||
$125M | 0.5%, 6/15/2016 | 125,107 | ||
150M | 0.625%, 12/31/2016 | 149,812 | ||
150M | 0.875%, 5/15/2017 | 150,094 | ||
25M | 0.875%, 11/15/2017 | 24,883 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $450,162) | 449,896 | |||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | ||||
SECURITIES—17.5% | ||||
Fannie Mae | ||||
92M | 2.5%, 1/1/2023 – 6/1/2023 | 95,177 | ||
227M | 3%, 11/1/2021 – 5/1/2023 | 236,816 | ||
25M | 3.5%, 12/1/2023 | 26,206 | ||
85M | 4%, 1/1/2021 – 9/1/2024 (a) | 91,130 | ||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $448,931) | 449,329 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | ||||
OBLIGATIONS—10.6% | ||||
71M | Federal Farm Credit Bank 5.125% 8/25/2016 | 76,274 | ||
100M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.875%, 5/24/2017 | 99,851 | ||
95M | Freddie Mac, 1.75%, 5/30/2019 | 95,587 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $271,778) | 271,712 | |||
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES—7.4% | ||||
Fixed Autos—5.9% | ||||
35M | Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust, 1%, 9/15/2017 | 35,097 | ||
45M | Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, 1.46%, 10/15/2020 | 44,915 | ||
70M | Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust, 1%, 7/16/2018 | 70,223 | ||
150,235 |
80 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Fixed Financials—1.5% | |||||||
$ 40M | Chase Issuance Trust, 1.3%, 2/18/2020 | $ 39,668 | |||||
Total Value of Asset Backed Securities (cost $190,047) | 189,903 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $2,435,883) | 94.8 | % | 2,429,475 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 5.2 | 131,784 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $2,561,259 |
(a) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis | |
(see Note 1G). | ||
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
81 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
December 31, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Exchange Traded Funds | $ | 1,068,635 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,068,635 | ||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 449,896 | — | 449,896 | ||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 449,329 | — | 449,329 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 271,712 | — | 271,712 | ||||||||
Asset Backed Securities | — | 189,903 | — | 189,903 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 1,068,635 | $ | 1,360,840 | $ | — | $ | 2,429,475 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for exchange traded |
funds and asset-backed securities. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
82 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Dear Investor:
We’re pleased to send you the First Investors Life Opportunity Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.73%, including capital gains of 0.7 cents per share.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
The Fund’s performance in 2014 was positive on an absolute basis. Due to stock selection, however, it did not keep up with the broader market. The Fund’s absolute performance was mainly attributable to investments in the health care and information technology sectors. Among the Fund’s health care stocks, Actavis, which makes generic and specialty pharmaceuticals, ended months of speculation in November when it agreed to acquire Allergan Inc. in an accretive $65 billion transaction. Actavis has a strong record of cutting costs from acquired companies to create strong earnings growth. Among our information technology stocks, Avago Technologies, which makes optoelectric components and subsystems used in wireless communications, beat and raised earnings expectations three times during the year. Earnings growth accelerated due to cost-cutting from a recent acquisition. The company also benefitted from its greater-than-expected iPhone 6 content.
On a relative basis, the Fund underperformed its benchmark, the S&P MidCap 400, which gained 9.77% over the review period, primarily due to stock selection in the consumer staples sector. In particular, Nu Skin Enterprises, a direct seller of personal care products and nutritional supplements, stock price fell when it suspended recruitment of distributors in China after the Chinese government decided to examine Nu Skin’s business practices. Later, in August and again in November, Nu Skin Enterprises cautioned that earnings would fall below expectations.
Among positives to relative performance, the Fund’s stock selection in the health care and industrial sectors helped. In health care, Actavis — discussed above — was the primary driver of outperformance. Among the Fund’s industrial stocks, Ryder System, a truck lease and commercial rental company, benefitted from increased industry regulatory burdens and an improved macro environment, which caused private fleet operators to favor outsourcing.
83 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
84 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,008.82 | $4.86 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,020.37 | $4.89 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .96%, multiplied by the average account value |
over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
85 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Opportunity Fund and the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Opportunity Fund beginning 12/17/12 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 400 stocks designed to measure performance of the mid-range sector of the U.S. stock market. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
86 |
Portfolio of Investments
OPPORTUNITY FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—97.0% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—20.3% | ||||
5,300 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | $ 65,561 | |
4,875 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 267,881 | ||
7,350 | CST Brands, Inc. | 320,533 | ||
7,200 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 523,584 | ||
50 | * | El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. | 998 | |
3,000 | Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. | 92,910 | ||
4,000 | Foot Locker, Inc. | 224,720 | ||
1,775 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 83,354 | ||
3,100 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 330,801 | ||
7,800 | * | Jarden Corporation | 373,464 | |
2,750 | L Brands, Inc. | 238,013 | ||
3,550 | Lear Corporation | 348,184 | ||
3,000 | * | Metaldyne Performance Group, Inc. | 52,080 | |
5,650 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 215,209 | ||
1,525 | Nordstrom, Inc. | 121,070 | ||
4,600 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 225,722 | ||
200 | * | Performance Sports Group, Ltd. | 3,598 | |
800 | Ralph Lauren Corporation | 148,128 | ||
12,500 | Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. | 187,500 | ||
8,600 | * | ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. | 230,222 | |
4,125 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 424,256 | |
4,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 252,000 | ||
1,300 | Whirlpool Corporation | 251,862 | ||
10,700 | * | William Lyon Homes – Class “A” | 216,889 | |
10,250 | Winnebago Industries, Inc. | 223,040 | ||
1,875 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 160,800 | ||
5,582,379 | ||||
Consumer Staples—2.5% | ||||
100 | * | Amira Nature Foods, Ltd. | 1,435 | |
4,575 | Avon Products, Inc. | 42,959 | ||
600 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 44,580 | ||
6,700 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 292,790 | ||
6,700 | Pinnacle Foods, Inc. | 236,510 | ||
2,200 | Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 67,430 | ||
685,704 |
87 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy—5.5% | ||||
925 | * | Dril-Quip, Inc. | $ 70,975 | |
2,475 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 74,126 | ||
2,400 | EOG Resources, Inc. | 220,968 | ||
2,750 | EQT Corporation | 208,175 | ||
7,200 | * | Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. | 156,240 | |
2,600 | Hess Corporation | 191,932 | ||
4,200 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 275,226 | ||
1,275 | Noble Corporation, PLC | 21,127 | ||
4,700 | RPC, Inc. | 61,288 | ||
9,000 | * | RSP Permian, Inc. | 226,260 | |
1,506,317 | ||||
Financials—14.7% | ||||
1,775 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 234,744 | ||
6,750 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 179,955 | ||
9,450 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 234,738 | ||
1,500 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 37,290 | ||
3,200 | City National Corporation | 258,592 | ||
5,800 | Discover Financial Services | 379,842 | ||
4,575 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 129,930 | ||
1,325 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 176,834 | ||
2,800 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 69,244 | ||
3,000 | First Republic Bank | 156,360 | ||
5,300 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 37,948 | |
2,000 | iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (ETF) | 289,600 | ||
3,550 | iShares Russell 2000 ETF (ETF) | 424,829 | ||
3,595 | NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. | 172,416 | ||
3,000 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 46,200 | ||
7,700 | Protective Life Corporation | 536,305 | ||
4,600 | * | Realogy Holdings Corporation | 204,654 | |
2,800 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 113,960 | ||
6,400 | Sterling Bancorp | 92,032 | ||
5,350 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 266,537 | ||
4,042,010 | ||||
Health Care—16.8% | ||||
4,150 | * | Actavis, PLC | 1,068,252 | |
1,475 | * | Centene Corporation | 153,179 | |
2,250 | DENTSPLY International, Inc. | 119,857 | ||
400 | * | Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc. | 10,948 |
88 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Health Care (continued) | ||||
5,600 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | $ 527,856 | |
6,750 | * | Lannett Company, Inc. | 289,440 | |
2,375 | McKesson Corporation | 493,003 | ||
4,125 | Omnicare, Inc. | 300,836 | ||
2,250 | Perrigo Company, PLC | 376,110 | ||
5,700 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 179,835 | ||
13,000 | * | Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. | 451,360 | |
3,825 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 479,234 | ||
6,100 | * | VWR Corporation | 157,807 | |
4,607,717 | ||||
Industrials—15.6% | ||||
4,900 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 276,409 | ||
8,550 | ADT Corporation | 309,766 | ||
8,500 | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | 195,330 | ||
6,450 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 183,115 | ||
2,000 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 102,240 | |
1,500 | Dover Corporation | 107,580 | ||
1,425 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 100,961 | ||
5,350 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 250,166 | |
5,000 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 268,650 | ||
1,775 | IDEX Corporation | 138,166 | ||
6,575 | ITT Corporation | 266,025 | ||
2,475 | J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | 208,519 | ||
2,750 | Regal-Beloit Corporation | 206,800 | ||
1,200 | Roper Industries, Inc. | 187,620 | ||
4,155 | Ryder System, Inc. | 385,792 | ||
2,300 | Snap-On, Inc. | 314,502 | ||
1,275 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 55,552 | |
1,775 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 60,918 | ||
4,600 | Textron, Inc. | 193,706 | ||
4,750 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 484,548 | |
4,296,365 | ||||
Information Technology—12.8% | ||||
7,350 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 221,897 | |
4,600 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 462,714 | ||
6,300 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 244,440 | |
7,625 | CDW Corporation | 268,171 | ||
2,750 | * | Fiserv, Inc. | 195,167 | |
4,525 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 65,477 |
89 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Information Technology (continued) | |||||||
9,200 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | $ 205,344 | |||||
12,200 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 267,424 | |||||
9,600 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 350,496 | |||||
8,400 | Symantec Corporation | 215,502 | |||||
3,850 | * | Synaptics, Inc. | 265,034 | ||||
2,300 | SYNNEX Corporation | 179,768 | |||||
3,600 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 227,700 | |||||
8,400 | Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 347,340 | |||||
3,516,474 | |||||||
Materials—4.3% | |||||||
3,700 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 170,829 | |||||
8,150 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 190,384 | |||||
2,200 | H.B. Fuller Company | 97,966 | |||||
3,600 | International Paper Company | 192,888 | |||||
1,200 | Praxair, Inc. | 155,472 | |||||
1,675 | Sigma-Aldrich Corporation | 229,927 | |||||
9,100 | * | Trinseo SA | 158,795 | ||||
1,196,261 | |||||||
Utilities—4.5% | |||||||
3,400 | AGL Resources, Inc. | 185,334 | |||||
4,900 | * | Dynegy, Inc. | 148,715 | ||||
3,625 | NiSource, Inc. | 153,773 | |||||
4,425 | Portland General Electric Company | 167,398 | |||||
4,125 | SCANA Corporation | 249,150 | |||||
6,100 | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | 321,714 | |||||
1,226,084 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $23,394,833) | 97.0 | % | 26,659,311 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 3.0 | 820,538 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $27,479,849 |
* | Non-income producing | |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
90 |
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks* | $ | 26,659,311 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 26,659,311 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 91 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Life Select Growth Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 13.53%, including dividends of 4.6 cents per share and capital gains of 1.5 cents per share.
The Fund’s solid performance for the period was helped by attention to reasonable valuation levels, as stocks with deep value characteristics such as low price-to-earnings and low price-to-book ratios were the leaders in the overall market. In addition, the Fund’s focus on companies exhibiting good earnings quality characteristics was somewhat beneficial, as was the Fund’s exposure to the larger companies in the market. Several growth characteristics did not help during the year, however, as the strong market did not differentiate much between fast and slow growth.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The market started the year with a January pullback and a February rally that resulted in modest positive performance for the first quarter, followed by solid returns in the second quarter. The second half of the review period saw the same pattern, with a quarter of moderate returns followed by solid returns in the year’s final quarter. Unquestionably, the volatility we experienced in the market, particularly in the second half of the year, is not uncommon for a midterm election year. While this year did not see a pullback with a magnitude typical of such a year, the uncertainty of the election is now in the past and we believe conditions are in place that could drive continued positive returns ahead. The U.S. economy is on a slow but improving trend, with earnings growth expected in the high single-digits range. With a favorable environment for corporate earnings coupled with valuation levels that are still fair relative to historical averages, we believe the companies owned in the Fund should continue to deliver solid results going forward.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
The Fund’s strong performance for the year was helped by stock selections in the Consumer Staples and Industrials sectors. In Consumer Staples, the strong performance was due to grocer Kroger. The company is consolidating the business and also seeing strength in private brand and higher margin natural foods, helping shares gain 65% for the year. In the Industrials sector, Alaska Air Group continued to deliver solid earnings, which, combined with lower anticipated fuel prices, pushed the stock up 65% during the review period. Also, shares of railroad Union Pacific gained 36% over 2014, as demand for transportation remained strong.
92 |
On the negative side, the Financials sector proved challenging for the Fund during the year. Comerica declined over 4%, as weaker oil prices prompted concerns about negative impacts to the Texas economy, while American Express only gained 4% during the year, shy of the benchmark’s 11% return in the sector, as less non-interest revenue worried investors.
We are pleased to have generated a strong return, both in absolute terms and relative to the benchmark, the Russell 3000 Growth Index during 2014. Looking forward to 2015, we believe that equities are likely able to generate solid returns, as expectations for continued slow and steady economic growth should provide a solid foundation for strong business performance from the companies in the Fund. We continue to believe our focus on high quality companies, where earnings will likely exceed market expectations, is the key to generating excess returns over the long-term.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
93 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,070.15 | $4.28 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,021.08 | $4.18 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .82%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
94 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Select Growth Fund and the Russell 3000 Growth Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Select Growth Fund beginning 12/31/04 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 3000 Growth Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values (the Russell 3000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
95 |
Portfolio of Investments
SELECT GROWTH FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—97.1% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—13.5% | ||||
18,300 | Garmin, Ltd. | $ 966,789 | ||
32,330 | Gentex Corporation | 1,168,083 | ||
14,525 | Home Depot, Inc. | 1,524,689 | ||
13,820 | Starbucks Corporation | 1,133,931 | ||
13,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 1,114,880 | ||
5,908,372 | ||||
Consumer Staples—8.5% | ||||
7,400 | Costco Wholesale Corporation | 1,048,950 | ||
7,640 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 882,726 | ||
27,500 | Kroger Company | 1,765,775 | ||
3,697,451 | ||||
Energy—5.3% | ||||
4,660 | Chevron Corporation | 522,759 | ||
5,080 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 469,646 | ||
7,720 | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 520,482 | ||
15,990 | Valero Energy Corporation | 791,505 | ||
2,304,392 | ||||
Financials—8.2% | ||||
16,150 | American Express Company | 1,502,596 | ||
12,300 | Comerica, Inc. | 576,132 | ||
13,590 | Discover Financial Services | 890,009 | ||
5,900 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 624,515 | ||
3,593,252 | ||||
Health Care—18.0% | ||||
7,120 | * | Actavis, PLC | 1,832,759 | |
16,200 | * | Align Technology, Inc. | 905,742 | |
4,900 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 816,438 | ||
11,100 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 1,046,286 | |
6,090 | Johnson & Johnson | 636,831 | ||
7,420 | McKesson Corporation | 1,540,244 | ||
18,000 | * | Quintiles Transnational Holdings, Inc. | 1,059,660 | |
7,837,960 |
96 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Industrials—17.4% | |||||||
22,860 | Alaska Air Group, Inc. | $ 1,366,114 | |||||
21,430 | AMETEK, Inc. | 1,127,861 | |||||
9,540 | Boeing Company | 1,240,009 | |||||
10,020 | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 1,114,224 | |||||
10,300 | Union Pacific Corporation | 1,227,039 | |||||
17,390 | Wabtec Corporation | 1,511,017 | |||||
7,586,264 | |||||||
Information Technology—26.2% | |||||||
5,830 | * | Alliance Data Systems Corporation | 1,667,671 | ||||
15,500 | Amdocs, Ltd. | 723,153 | |||||
9,200 | * | ANSYS, Inc. | 754,400 | ||||
20,850 | Apple, Inc. | 2,301,423 | |||||
26,300 | * | Aspen Technology, Inc. | 921,026 | ||||
39,100 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1,087,566 | |||||
10,200 | DST Systems, Inc. | 960,330 | |||||
8,300 | * | F5 Networks, Inc. | 1,082,860 | ||||
11,400 | * | Facebook, Inc. – Class “A” | 889,428 | ||||
25,610 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 1,027,729 | |||||
11,415,586 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $29,803,270) | 97.1 | % | 42,343,277 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 2.9 | 1,243,486 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $43,586,763 |
* | Non-income producing |
97 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
December 31, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks* | $ | 42,343,277 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 42,343,277 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
98 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Life Special Situations Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net-asset value basis was 6.30%, including dividends of 18.5 cents per share and capital gains of $6.61 per share.
Fund Review and Performance Attribution
The Fund performed well, posting strong results while also exceeding its benchmark index by a comfortable margin. The Fund’s absolute performance was mainly attributable to investments in health care, information technology, and financial stocks. Among health care stocks, Centene, a Medicaid managed care provider, benefitted from news that fees attributable to the Affordable Care Act would be borne by the states, rather than managed care operators. Furthermore, costs associated with exposure to Sovaldi, the company’s new high cost drug for hepatitis C, were lower than anticipated. Among information technology stocks, TriQuint Semiconductor, which makes components for the consumer smartphone market, benefitted from the following factors: 1) its announcement that it would merge with RF Micro Devices, and subsequently realize significant expense synergies; 2) the strong demand for its radio frequency component used in 4G LTE networks; and 3) its position as a component supplier for Apple’s iPhone. Among financial stocks held by the Fund, Protective Life Corporation, an insurance company, agreed to be acquired by Dai-Ichi Life Insurance Company for a hefty premium.
On a relative basis, the Fund outperformed its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index, which gained 4.89% over the review period, primarily due to stock selection in the industrials, information technology and materials sectors. Among industrials, Ryder Systems, a truck lease and commercial rental company, has been a primary beneficiary of increased industry regulatory burdens and an improved macro environment, which has caused private fleet operators to favor outsourcing instead. In information technology, TriQuint Semiconductor — discussed above — was the primary driver of outperformance. In materials, Westlake Chemicals, a maker of vinyls, ethylene and other polymers, transferred assets to a limited partnership that benefited from favorable tax treatment. It also acquired a German chlor-vinyls producer in a highly accretive transaction.
99 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
100 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $993.03 | $3.97 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,021.23 | $4.02 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .79%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
101 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Special Situations Fund and the Russell 2000 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Special Situations Fund beginning 12/31/04 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged Index that measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Index consists of the smallest 2,000 companies in the Russell 3000 Index (which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, it is assumed that all dividend and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
102 |
Portfolio of Investments
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—98.7% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—16.8% | ||||
74,650 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | $ 923,421 | |
93,625 | CST Brands, Inc. | 4,082,986 | ||
25,000 | Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc. | 774,250 | ||
112,550 | * | Fox Factory Holding Corporation | 1,826,686 | |
17,925 | Hanesbrands, Inc. | 2,000,788 | ||
17,500 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 1,867,425 | ||
64,875 | * | Jarden Corporation | 3,106,215 | |
55,325 | * | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. | 1,444,536 | |
30,250 | * | Metaldyne Performance Group, Inc. | 525,140 | |
39,875 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 1,956,666 | ||
28,200 | * | Performance Sports Group, Ltd. | 507,318 | |
89,100 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 1,903,176 | ||
118,225 | Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. | 1,773,375 | ||
85,000 | * | ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. | 2,275,450 | |
42,275 | * | Starz – Class “A” | 1,255,568 | |
28,650 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 1,804,950 | ||
35,800 | * | Visteon Corporation | 3,825,588 | |
74,000 | * | William Lyon Homes – Class “A” | 1,499,980 | |
81,900 | Winnebago Industries, Inc. | 1,782,144 | ||
35,135,662 | ||||
Consumer Staples—1.9% | ||||
155,000 | Inventure Foods, Inc. | 1,974,700 | ||
6,975 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 304,808 | ||
45,550 | Pinnacle Foods, Inc. | 1,607,915 | ||
2,000 | * | Smart & Final Stores, Inc. | 31,460 | |
3,918,883 | ||||
Energy—6.2% | ||||
14,750 | * | Dril-Quip, Inc. | 1,131,767 | |
79,725 | * | Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. | 1,730,032 | |
93,212 | * | Matrix Service Company | 2,080,492 | |
69,125 | * | RSP Permian, Inc. | 1,737,803 | |
84,775 | * | Stone Energy Corporation | 1,431,002 | |
86,375 | Western Refining, Inc. | 3,263,248 | ||
46,382 | * | Whiting Petroleum Corporation | 1,530,606 | |
12,904,950 |
103 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Financials—21.2% | ||||
60,275 | American Financial Group, Inc. | $ 3,659,898 | ||
36,925 | Aspen Insurance Holdings, Ltd. | 1,616,207 | ||
71,675 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 1,910,855 | ||
84,700 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 2,103,948 | ||
44,200 | Brown & Brown, Inc. | 1,454,622 | ||
26,575 | City National Corporation | 2,147,526 | ||
67,050 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 1,904,220 | ||
17,625 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 2,352,232 | ||
45,675 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 1,129,543 | ||
1,011 | FNF Group, Inc. | 34,829 | ||
65,000 | * | Green Bancorp, Inc. | 782,600 | |
23,250 | iShares Russell 2000 ETF (ETF) | 2,782,327 | ||
75,500 | Montpelier Re Holdings, Ltd. | 2,704,410 | ||
67,350 | OceanFirst Financial Corporation | 1,154,379 | ||
58,325 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 898,205 | ||
21,900 | Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. | 1,212,384 | ||
63,700 | Protective Life Corporation | 4,436,705 | ||
43,800 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 1,782,660 | ||
173,175 | Sterling Bancorp | 2,490,257 | ||
121,400 | * | Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (REIT) | 1,606,122 | |
80,400 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 1,327,404 | ||
101,875 | TCF Financial Corporation | 1,618,794 | ||
34,600 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 757,048 | ||
24,400 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,215,608 | ||
76,000 | Washington Prime Group, Inc. (REIT) | 1,308,720 | ||
44,391,503 | ||||
Health Care—11.1% | ||||
56,025 | * | ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3,159,250 | |
42,875 | * | Centene Corporation | 4,452,569 | |
3,200 | * | Diplomat Pharmacy, Inc. | 87,584 | |
63,275 | * | Exactech, Inc. | 1,491,392 | |
123,000 | * | Horizon Pharma, PLC | 1,585,470 | |
24,000 | * | ICON, PLC | 1,223,760 | |
58,100 | * | Lannett Company, Inc. | 2,491,328 | |
43,975 | Omnicare, Inc. | 3,207,097 | ||
37,100 | PerkinElmer, Inc. | 1,622,383 | ||
60,600 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 1,911,930 | ||
700 | * | Surgical Care Affiliates, Inc. | 23,555 | |
72,200 | * | VWR Corporation | 1,867,814 | |
23,124,132 |
104 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Industrials—18.7% | ||||
42,800 | A.O. Smith Corporation | $ 2,414,348 | ||
72,200 | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | 1,659,156 | ||
49,150 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 1,395,368 | ||
19,350 | Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. | 882,166 | ||
17,975 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,273,529 | ||
44,300 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 2,071,468 | |
34,500 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 1,853,685 | ||
61,000 | Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 3,450,770 | ||
62,750 | ITT Corporation | 2,538,865 | ||
73,425 | Kforce, Inc. | 1,771,745 | ||
140,975 | * | NCI Building Systems, Inc. | 2,610,857 | |
41,000 | Orbital Sciences Corporation | 1,102,490 | ||
22,000 | Patrick Industries, Inc. | 967,560 | ||
4,525 | Precision Castparts Corporation | 1,089,982 | ||
18,000 | Regal-Beloit Corporation | 1,353,600 | ||
53,275 | Ryder System, Inc. | 4,946,584 | ||
20,050 | Snap-On, Inc. | 2,741,637 | ||
14,250 | Standex International Corporation | 1,100,955 | ||
37,900 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 3,866,179 | |
39,090,944 | ||||
Information Technology—16.2% | ||||
68,625 | * | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | 1,626,412 | |
62,000 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 1,871,780 | |
59,925 | Avnet, Inc. | 2,577,973 | ||
63,950 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 2,481,260 | |
106,100 | CDW Corporation | 3,731,537 | ||
61,625 | * | CommScope Holding Company, Inc. | 1,406,899 | |
113,225 | * | Entegris, Inc. | 1,495,702 | |
12,025 | IAC/InterActiveCorp | 731,000 | ||
66,200 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 957,914 | ||
65,000 | * | JDS Uniphase Corporation | 891,800 | |
102,225 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 2,240,772 | ||
95,475 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 3,485,792 | ||
53,025 | * | Microsemi Corporation | 1,504,850 | |
25,000 | Newport Corporation | 477,750 | ||
98,275 | * | Orbotech, Ltd. | 1,454,470 | |
30,500 | * | OSI Systems, Inc. | 2,158,485 |
105 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Information Technology (continued) | |||||||
23,100 | * | Synaptics, Inc. | $ 1,590,204 | ||||
20,200 | SYNNEX Corporation | 1,578,832 | |||||
26,575 | * | Verint Systems, Inc. | 1,548,791 | ||||
33,812,223 | |||||||
Materials—3.2% | |||||||
39,700 | AptarGroup, Inc. | 2,653,548 | |||||
64,200 | * | Ferro Corporation | 832,032 | ||||
20,200 | Sensient Technologies Corporation | 1,218,868 | |||||
67,600 | * | Trinseo SA | 1,179,620 | ||||
13,700 | Westlake Chemical Corporation | 836,933 | |||||
6,721,001 | |||||||
Utilities—3.4% | |||||||
25,000 | AGL Resources, Inc. | 1,362,750 | |||||
42,000 | * | Dynegy, Inc. | 1,274,700 | ||||
40,100 | Portland General Electric Company | 1,516,983 | |||||
25,000 | SCANA Corporation | 1,510,000 | |||||
29,000 | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | 1,529,460 | |||||
7,193,893 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $163,951,763) | 206,293,191 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—.7% | |||||||
$1,500M | Fannie Mae, 0.02%, 1/20/2015 (cost $1,499,984) | 1,499,984 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $165,451,747) | 99.4 | % | 207,793,175 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .6 | 1,152,334 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $208,945,509 |
* | Non-income producing | |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
106 |
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 206,293,191 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 206,293,191 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 1,499,984 | — | 1,499,984 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 206,293,191 | $ | 1,499,984 | $ | — | $ | 207,793,175 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 107 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
TARGET MATURITY 2015 FUND
Dear Investor:
We’re pleased to send you the First Investors Life Target Maturity 2015 Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 0.03%, including dividends of 71.1 cents per share and capital gains of 28.4 cents per share.
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek a predictable compounded return consistent with preservation of capital for the investors who hold the Fund’s shares until maturity. To meet this objective, the Fund is fully invested in high quality zero coupon bonds that are due to mature on or around the Fund’s maturity date.
With the Federal Reserve committed to end its zero interest rate policy sometime around mid-2015, shorter-term yields edged higher in anticipation. Two-year Treasury note yields increased by 29 basis points (0.29%), from 0.38% to 0.67%. Nonetheless, almost all of the Fund’s return was due to the accretion of its zero coupon holdings as they moved closer to maturity in 2015.
The Fund underperformed its benchmark, the Citigroup U.S. Treasury/Government Sponsored Index. The Fund’s duration, a measurement of interest rate risk, was less than that of the Index because the Fund is nearing its target maturity date. As a result, the Fund did not benefit from the decrease in longer-term interest rates that occurred in 2014, which propelled the benchmark’s return.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
108 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
TARGET MATURITY 2015 FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $997.81 | $3.52 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,021.68 | $3.57 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .70%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid | |
during the period are net of expenses waived. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
109 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
TARGET MATURITY 2015 FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Target Maturity 2015 Fund and the Citigroup U.S. Treasury/Government Sponsored Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Target Maturity 2015 Fund beginning 12/31/04 with a theoretical investment in the Citigroup U.S. Treasury/Government Sponsored Index (the “Index”). The Index is a market capitalization-weighted index that consists of debt issued by the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government sponsored agencies. Every issue included in the Index is trader-priced, and the Index follows consistent and realistic availability limits, including only those securities with sufficient amounts outstanding. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Average Annual Total Returns for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (0.12%), 3.05% and 4.19%, respectively.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
110 |
Portfolio of Investments
TARGET MATURITY 2015 FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | Effective | ||||||
Amount | Security | Yield | † | Value | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY ZERO COUPON | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—78.5% | |||||||
Agency For International Development – Israel: | |||||||
$ 698M | 9/15/2015 | 0.44 | % | $ 695,837 | |||
2,134M | 11/15/2015 | 0.50 | 2,124,725 | ||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
243M | 8/12/2015 | 0.25 | 242,633 | ||||
600M | 9/23/2015 | 0.25 | 598,918 | ||||
2,208M | 11/15/2015 | 0.56 | 2,197,256 | ||||
650M | Federal Judiciary Office Building, 2/15/2015 | 0.91 | 649,265 | ||||
Freddie Mac: | |||||||
550M | 3/15/2015 | 0.15 | 549,829 | ||||
930M | 9/15/2015 | 0.26 | 928,304 | ||||
830M | 9/15/2015 | 0.26 | 828,478 | ||||
210M | Government Trust Certificate – Turkey Trust, 5/15/2015 | 0.93 | 209,268 | ||||
200M | International Bank for Reconstruction & | ||||||
Development, 2/15/2015 | 0.52 | 199,871 | |||||
2,727M | Resolution Funding Corporation, 10/15/2015 | 0.30 | 2,720,564 | ||||
2,000M | Tennessee Valley Authority, 11/1/2015 | 0.56 | 1,990,598 | ||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Zero | |||||||
Coupon Obligations (cost $13,426,544) | 13,935,546 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT ZERO COUPON | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—21.6% | |||||||
3,840M | U.S. Treasury Strips, 11/15/2015 (cost $3,639,151) | 0.22 | 3,832,585 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $17,065,695) | 100.1 | % | 17,768,131 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.1 | ) | (14,203) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $17,753,928 |
† | The effective yields shown for the zero coupon obligations are the effective yields at |
December 31, 2014. |
111 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TARGET MATURITY 2015 FUND
December 31, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
U.S. Government Agency Zero | ||||||||||||
Coupon Obligations | $ | — | $ | 13,935,546 | $ | — | $ | 13,935,546 | ||||
U.S. Government Zero Coupon | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 3,832,585 | — | 3,832,585 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 17,768,131 | $ | — | $ | 17,768,131 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
112 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Dear Investor:
We’re pleased to send you the First Investors Life Total Return Fund annual report for the year ended December 31, 2014. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.97%, including dividends of 1.2 cents per share.
The Fund’s performance this year was driven in substantial part by its policy of allocating its assets among equities, fixed income investments and cash. On average, the Fund maintained allocations of 58% in equities, 34% in fixed income, and 8% in cash.
Economic Overview
The U.S. economy grew at approximately 2.5% during 2014, with growth accelerating in the second half of the year. Of note, the unemployment rate fell from 6.7% to 5.6%, its lowest level since 2008, as the economy created the most jobs in fifteen years. This good news was tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate (i.e., the percentage of the population participating in the labor force) and anemic wage growth. Inflation was subdued with consumer prices increasing only 0.8%, compared to 1.5% in 2013, in part due to the decline in energy prices during the fourth quarter.
The improvement in the economy and labor market allowed the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) to conclude its bond buying program — part of its effort to stimulate growth by lowering interest rates — in October. As well, the Fed remained on course to begin raising the federal funds rate in the second half of 2015, although low inflation (below the Fed’s 2% target) and international developments could delay rate hikes.
Fixed Income Review and Performance Attribution
Long-term U.S. interest rates moved sharply lower throughout the review period, despite a strong consensus at the beginning of the year that rates would continue to rise. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors: slower than expected global growth (especially in Europe), very low foreign interest rates, geopolitical events (e.g., Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS, Ebola) that supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, investors’ belief that the upcoming Fed tightening cycle would be more limited than in the past, and deflationary fears which were exacerbated by the collapse in oil prices. For the year, the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield fell from 3.03%, a two-and-a-half year high, to 2.17%.
The broad U.S. bond market returned 6.3% during the review period, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. In particular, long-term bonds had very strong returns as interest rates fell and bond prices rose (interest rates, or yields, and bond
113 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
prices have an inverse relationship; bond prices rise as interest rates fall). Notably, Treasury securities with maturities longer than ten years gained over 24%.
Returns varied by sector. Investment-grade corporate bonds gained 7.5% as the benefit of lower interest rates offset the negative impact of wider spreads. Mortgage-backed securities and the broad Treasury market returned 6.1% and 6%, respectively. High yield bonds lagged the broad bond market, gaining 2.5% as spreads widened. Non-U.S. government bonds also underperformed the broad market, returning 1.1%, as the substantial appreciation of the U.S. Dollar offset gains from lower interest rates. Money market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very accommodative monetary policy.
The Fund’s average bond and cash allocations during the review period were 34% and 8%, respectively. Sector allocations as a percent of Fund assets were 25.2% corporate bonds, 3.1% U.S. Treasuries, 2.3% mortgage-backed securities, 1.8% US agency securities, and 1.1% municipal bonds. The Fund’s bond allocation returned 4.97% versus 6.3% for the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index. The majority of the underperformance was due to an underweight in 10+ year maturities based on our expectation for higher interest rates. Security selection in the U.S. Government sector also detracted from performance.
Equities Review and Performance Attribution
During the year under review, equity performance was buoyed by solid data signaling a strengthening U.S. economy, healthy corporate earnings and a lack of attractive opportunities elsewhere in the globe. Domestic stocks continuously plumbed new highs to finish 2014 in solidly positive territory, largely in-line with consensus expectations of a more moderate performance than 2013’s meteoric market rise. Due to a number of factors, including oil and currency market turmoil, economic weakness in parts of the globe, and worries about Fed actions, volatility increased throughout the final months of the year, bringing a choppy, uneven cadence to the market’s trajectory. This uneven cadence represented the overall narrowing of the market rally’s breadth as the year progressed. The rally in the markets appeared more concentrated than before, as shares included in popular indexed strategies that are tracked by index funds and ETFs outperformed those that are not tied to market indicators. As such, many “secondary” stocks and smaller-cap names underperformed for the year.
This year’s market results were positive overall though, with all market sectors, styles and sizes participating. Companies with strong profitability, earnings growth, solid balance sheets and strong, free cash flows lead results. Mergers and acquisitions also continued to drive strong performance. Small- and mid-cap stocks lagged their larger counterparts, as investors reacted to market uncertainty.
114 |
These conditions were challenging for the Fund’s equity allocation, leading it to underperform its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, which gained 13.7% over the review period. The Fund continued to invest across all market capitalization segments, allocating 73% of holdings to large-cap, 14% to mid-cap and 13% to small-cap stocks1 as of period end. The Fund sought to be fully invested throughout the year, maintaining minimal cash positions. The large-cap segment of the Fund had results that slightly exceeded the benchmark. While the mid-cap segments performed in-line, the smaller-cap portion of the portfolio significantly underperformed on a relative and absolute basis. Relative results were impacted by the Fund’s stock selection within consumer staples and industrials, and from overall sector allocation decisions within utilities and financials relative to benchmark weightings.
Among portfolio highlights, in information technology, good stock selection and an overweighting of the sector added to strong relative performance for the year. Semiconductor manufacturer Avago Technologies had a very strong year, gaining 90% in 2014. The company benefited from strong quarterly results, completion of the accretive acquisition of competitor LSI, and from the company’s increased content on the very successful iPhone 6. Apple (a top 10 position) also had a strong year for the Fund as the stock was up over 37% in 2014. Solid earnings, a $30 billion increase in the share buyback, a 7 for 1 stock split, and a better-than-expected launch of the company’s new products drove the stock higher. Longtime holding Microsoft also produced positive returns for the Fund, as its shares were up 24% in 2014. The company hired a new CEO, announced a large cost-cutting plan, agreed to purchase an up-and-coming game developer, Mojang, and delivered strong results, as PC demand came in higher-than-expected. Intel had a strong year in 2014, up almost 40% as the company benefited from the PC refresh cycle, delivered good results, and announced that it was going to split the company in two as a way to increase shareholder value.
In health care, the Fund benefitted from strong pharmaceutical and biotech performance. Actavis (a top 10 position) had a very strong year and was up 53% in 2014. The company reported strong results, announced and completed the acquisition of competitor Forest Laboratories in a highly accretive transaction, was approached by Pfizer as a potential M&A target, and announced the $69 billion acquisition of competitor Allergan. Gilead Sciences, the biopharmaceutical company, was up 25% in 2014, as the company delivered strong business results. The company also received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and strong initial orders for its blockbuster next-generation hepatitis C drug called Sovaldi, and follow-on Harvoni, in addition to numerous other drugs in the R&D pipeline that presented successful clinical trials.
1 Capitalization ranges defined by Lipper.
115 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
The consumer discretionary sector also had a solid year. Top names were from the automotive components industry, as well as specialty retail. Shares of Harman International and Delphi Automotive rallied, as new technologies were being implemented in car electronics and center stack control modules, driving increased take rates and sales. Harman was up 30% and Delphi rallied 21%. Shares of auto component maker TRW Automotive rose 38% on receipt of a takeover offer from German company ZF Friedrichshafen.
Among negative contributors, the key disappointments for the year were within the consumer staples sector. Shares of health and beauty direct seller Nu Skin Enterprises fell 68% in the review period, driving the majority of the sector’s and the Fund’s underperformance. After seeing robust sales and profit growth in 2013, and being the Fund’s top performer, the company voluntarily halted recruitment of new distributors in China following a government regulator’s decision to look into Nu Skin’s recruiting and sales practices, after some negative articles appeared in the Chinese press. While the company was cleared to resume sales recruitment in China shortly thereafter Nu Skin’s business results came in much lower than expected throughout the year, as the restart of sales recruiting took longer than expected. The company, in turn, issued a more conservative 2015 earnings outlook than Wall Street’s expectations. While there are significant new product introductions planned, they are not expected to contribute until the second half of 2015. Herbalife, another direct seller, was also weak in 2014, down 52%. During the year, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission confirmed an investigation into the company’s business practices following short seller allegations that the company was operating an illegal pyramid scheme. Additionally, the company’s subsequent poor profits reports and disappointing earnings guidance pressured shares. The stock was sold out of the Fund’s portfolio during the year.
In industrials, the primary source of underperformance came from shares of NeuStar, an IT services company that provides local number portability services in the U.S., which was down 44% in 2014. Concerns about the company’s largest contract were confirmed as an advisory committee to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recommended that the contract be awarded to NeuStar’s competitor. This caused investors to fear that the company would lose the Local Number Portability Administration (LNPA) contract that makes up a material portion of the company’s sales and profits. Engineering and construction firm Chicago Bridge & Iron was also weak, as falling energy prices impacted the cadence of new contracts and slowed workflow from the energy and process industries business. Both companies’ shares were sold out of the Fund’s portfolio.
116 |
The utilities and financials sectors both had strong years in an absolute sense in 2014. The Fund remained significantly underweight both sectors throughout the year, however, which led to relative underperformance. Utilities remain a challenging sector for the Fund to hold, as earnings growth is typically anemic and unaligned with the Fund’s objectives in seeking growth and income for investors. Shares in the sector tend to move on interest rate fluctuations, and benefitted from rates dropping in the fourth quarter. Financials also remain challenging, as increased regulatory scrutiny limit their abilities to grow or return capital to shareholders.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
117 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(7/1/14) | (12/31/14) | (7/1/14–12/31/14)* | |
Expense Examples | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,016.53 | $4.83 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,020.42 | $4.84 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .95%, multiplied by the average account |
value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of December 31, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
118 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Total Return Fund, the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Life Series Total Return Fund beginning 12/17/12 (commencement of operations) with theoretical investments in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Indices”). The BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar denominated investment grade debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market, including U.S. Treasuries, quasi-government, corporate and residential mortgage pass-through securities. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
* The Average Annual Total Return figures are for the periods ended 12/31/14.
The returns shown do not reflect any sales charges, since the Fund sells its shares solely to variable annuity and/or variable life insurance subaccounts at net asset value. The returns do not reflect the fees and charges that an individual would pay in connection with an investment in a variable annuity or life contract or policy. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that an investor would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management
119 |
Portfolio of Investments
TOTAL RETURN FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—58.1% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—8.7% | ||||
2,400 | BorgWarner, Inc. | $ 131,880 | ||
3,900 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 215,826 | ||
2,700 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 196,344 | ||
2,000 | Foot Locker, Inc. | 112,360 | ||
4,550 | Ford Motor Company | 70,525 | ||
1,250 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 58,700 | ||
1,400 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 149,394 | ||
1,600 | Home Depot, Inc. | 167,952 | ||
3,675 | * | Jarden Corporation | 175,959 | |
1,800 | L Brands, Inc. | 155,790 | ||
1,800 | Lear Corporation | 176,544 | ||
1,300 | Magna International, Inc. | 141,297 | ||
2,900 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 110,461 | ||
1,400 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 68,698 | ||
1,000 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 102,850 | |
1,750 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 110,250 | ||
1,500 | Walt Disney Company | 141,285 | ||
500 | Whirlpool Corporation | 96,870 | ||
1,250 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 107,200 | ||
2,490,185 | ||||
Consumer Staples—4.5% | ||||
4,100 | Altria Group, Inc. | 202,007 | ||
2,300 | Avon Products, Inc. | 21,597 | ||
3,200 | Coca-Cola Company | 135,104 | ||
2,450 | CVS Health Corporation | 235,959 | ||
3,200 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 139,840 | ||
1,500 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 141,840 | ||
2,500 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 203,625 | ||
950 | Procter & Gamble Company | 86,535 | ||
1,400 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 120,232 | ||
1,286,739 | ||||
Energy—4.7% | ||||
1,150 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | 94,875 | ||
1,200 | Chevron Corporation | 134,616 | ||
2,000 | ConocoPhillips | 138,120 | ||
2,100 | Devon Energy Corporation | 128,541 | ||
1,000 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 29,950 | ||
1,700 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 157,165 |
120 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
900 | Hess Corporation | $ 66,438 | ||
2,600 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 73,554 | ||
1,700 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 153,442 | ||
1,400 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 91,742 | ||
700 | Noble Corporation, PLC | 11,599 | ||
850 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 68,518 | ||
1,000 | Phillips 66 | 71,700 | ||
400 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 34,164 | ||
3,100 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 98,518 | ||
1,352,942 | ||||
Financials—6.8% | ||||
2,100 | American Express Company | 195,384 | ||
1,300 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 171,925 | ||
4,850 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 120,474 | ||
600 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 14,916 | ||
1,800 | Discover Financial Services | 117,882 | ||
900 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 22,257 | ||
1,750 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 12,530 | |
600 | iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (ETF) | 86,880 | ||
1,500 | iShares Russell 2000 ETF (ETF) | 179,505 | ||
3,600 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 225,288 | ||
500 | Morgan Stanley | 19,400 | ||
1,350 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 123,160 | ||
900 | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (ETF) | 184,950 | ||
900 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 36,630 | ||
5,000 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 82,550 | ||
3,200 | U.S. Bancorp | 143,840 | ||
3,450 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 75,486 | ||
2,150 | Wells Fargo & Company | 117,863 | ||
1,930,920 | ||||
Health Care—10.7% | ||||
3,550 | Abbott Laboratories | 159,821 | ||
3,100 | AbbVie, Inc. | 202,864 | ||
1,300 | * | Actavis, PLC | 334,633 | |
1,600 | Baxter International, Inc. | 117,264 | ||
1,550 | Covidien, PLC | 158,534 | ||
1,800 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 152,406 | |
4,750 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 447,735 |
121 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
December 31, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Health Care (continued) | ||||
2,550 | Johnson & Johnson | $ 266,653 | ||
118 | * | Mallinckrodt, PLC | 11,686 | |
600 | McKesson Corporation | 124,548 | ||
2,900 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 164,691 | ||
2,950 | * | Mylan, Inc. | 166,291 | |
1,700 | Omnicare, Inc. | 123,981 | ||
7,600 | Pfizer, Inc. | 236,740 | ||
1,600 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 50,480 | ||
2,400 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 300,696 | ||
900 | Zoetis, Inc. | 38,727 | ||
3,057,750 | ||||
Industrials—7.2% | ||||
1,600 | 3M Company | 262,912 | ||
4,100 | ADT Corporation | 148,543 | ||
2,300 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 65,297 | ||
800 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 40,896 | |
750 | Caterpillar, Inc. | 68,647 | ||
600 | Dover Corporation | 43,032 | ||
2,350 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 109,886 | |
3,450 | General Electric Company | 87,181 | ||
2,100 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 112,833 | ||
1,900 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 189,848 | ||
2,150 | ITT Corporation | 86,989 | ||
150 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 28,885 | ||
1,650 | Ryder System, Inc. | 153,203 | ||
800 | Snap-On, Inc. | 109,392 | ||
700 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 30,499 | |
1,000 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 34,320 | ||
3,200 | Textron, Inc. | 134,752 | ||
2,400 | Tyco International, Ltd. | 105,264 | ||
700 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 71,407 | |
1,450 | United Technologies Corporation | 166,750 | ||
2,050,536 | ||||
Information Technology—11.8% | ||||
3,200 | Apple, Inc. | 353,216 | ||
2,900 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 87,551 | |
2,000 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 201,180 | ||
1,200 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 46,560 | |
3,100 | CDW Corporation | 109,027 | ||
8,000 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 222,520 |
122 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||
900 | * | eBay, Inc. | $ 50,508 | |
7,800 | EMC Corporation | 231,972 | ||
4,200 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 168,546 | ||
5,300 | Intel Corporation | 192,337 | ||
1,400 | International Business Machines Corporation | 224,616 | ||
4,600 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 102,672 | ||
5,700 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 124,944 | ||
3,850 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 140,563 | ||
5,750 | Microsoft Corporation | 267,087 | ||
2,100 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 160,440 | |
3,200 | Oracle Corporation | 143,904 | ||
1,600 | * | PTC, Inc. | 58,640 | |
2,300 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 170,959 | ||
4,200 | Symantec Corporation | 107,751 | ||
1,200 | * | Synaptics, Inc. | 82,608 | |
1,600 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 101,200 | ||
700 | * | Yahoo!, Inc. | 35,357 | |
3,384,158 | ||||
Materials—2.2% | ||||
2,000 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 92,340 | ||
4,000 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 93,440 | ||
1,100 | H.B. Fuller Company | 48,983 | ||
2,000 | International Paper Company | 107,160 | ||
1,450 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 115,115 | ||
400 | Praxair, Inc. | 51,824 | ||
1,200 | RPM International, Inc. | 60,852 | ||
2,800 | * | Trinseo SA | 48,860 | |
618,574 | ||||
Telecommunication Services—1.1% | ||||
4,300 | AT&T, Inc. | 144,437 | ||
3,800 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 177,764 | ||
322,201 | ||||
Utilities—.4% | ||||
2,150 | * | Dynegy, Inc. | 65,252 | |
1,350 | NiSource, Inc. | 57,267 | ||
122,519 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $14,715,904) | 16,616,524 |
123 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
CORPORATE BONDS—21.1% | ||||
Agriculture—.4% | ||||
$100M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 11/27/2017 (a) | $ 111,823 | ||
Automotive—.4% | ||||
100M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 109,873 | ||
Chemicals—.3% | ||||
100M | CF Industries, Inc., 3.45%, 6/1/2023 | 97,931 | ||
Energy—2.6% | ||||
100M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 5/15/2019 (a) | 108,278 | ||
100M | Continental Resources, Inc., 5%, 9/15/2022 | 96,875 | ||
100M | DCP Midstream Operating, LP, 2.5%, 12/1/2017 | 99,955 | ||
100M | Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, 4.2%, 9/15/2021 | 104,603 | ||
100M | Suncor Energy, Inc., 6.1%, 6/1/2018 | 112,258 | ||
100M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 3/15/2019 | 124,825 | ||
100M | Weatherford International, Inc., 6.35%, 6/15/2017 | 106,961 | ||
753,755 | ||||
Financial Services—3.6% | ||||
100M | Aflac, Inc., 8.5%, 5/15/2019 | 125,090 | ||
100M | American Express Co., 7%, 3/19/2018 | 115,780 | ||
100M | American International Group, Inc., 6.4%, 12/15/2020 | 119,398 | ||
100M | Assured Guaranty US Holding, Inc., 5%, 7/1/2024 | 105,614 | ||
100M | ERAC USA Finance, Inc., 3.3%, 10/15/2022 (a) | 99,326 | ||
100M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 8.125%, 1/15/2020 | 123,998 | ||
100M | General Electric Capital Corp., 5.625%, 9/15/2017 | 111,048 | ||
100M | Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 108,354 | ||
100M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 120,332 | ||
1,028,940 | ||||
Financials—3.8% | ||||
100M | Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 5/1/2018 | 111,182 | ||
100M | Barclays Bank, PLC, 5.125%, 1/8/2020 | 112,248 | ||
100M | Citigroup, Inc., 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 111,583 | ||
100M | Deutsche Bank AG London, 3.7%, 5/30/2024 | 101,677 | ||
100M | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 101,438 | ||
100M | JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6%, 1/15/2018 | 111,931 | ||
100M | Morgan Stanley, 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 113,988 |
124 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Financials (continued) | ||||
$100M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | $ 110,924 | ||
100M | U.S. Bancorp., 3.6%, 9/11/2024 | 101,757 | ||
100M | Wells Fargo & Co., 4.6%, 4/1/2021 | 111,418 | ||
1,088,146 | ||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—1.3% | ||||
100M | Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 11/10/2018 | 127,087 | ||
100M | Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, 4.625%, 2/1/2044 | 109,216 | ||
100M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/2019 | 120,484 | ||
356,787 | ||||
Forest Products/Container—.4% | ||||
100M | Rock-Tenn Co., 4.9%, 3/1/2022 | 107,582 | ||
Health Care—.8% | ||||
100M | Biogen IDEC, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2018 | 115,327 | ||
100M | Express Scripts Holding Co., 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 110,518 | ||
225,845 | ||||
Manufacturing—.4% | ||||
100M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 112,635 | ||
Media-Broadcasting—.4% | ||||
100M | Comcast Corp., 5.15%, 3/1/2020 | 113,382 | ||
Metals/Mining—.7% | ||||
100M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 107,277 | ||
100M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/2021 | 102,932 | ||
210,209 | ||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—1.1% | ||||
100M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | 114,663 | ||
100M | HCP, Inc., 5.375%, 2/1/2021 | 111,812 | ||
100M | Simon Property Group, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2024 | 101,922 | ||
328,397 | ||||
Retail-General Merchandise—.9% | ||||
100M | GAP, Inc., 5.95%, 4/12/2021 | 113,952 | ||
100M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 131,044 | ||
244,996 |
125 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
December 31, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Telecommunications—.8% | ||||
$100M | AT&T, Inc., 6.5%, 9/1/2037 | $ 123,944 | ||
100M | Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.15%, 9/15/2023 | 110,501 | ||
234,445 | ||||
Transportation—1.2% | ||||
100M | Burlington North Santa Fe, LLC, 5.15%, 9/1/2043 | 115,767 | ||
100M | GATX Corp., 5.2%, 3/15/2044 | 109,490 | ||
100M | Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, 4.875%, 7/11/2022 (a) | 107,892 | ||
333,149 | ||||
Utilities—2.0% | ||||
100M | Duke Energy Progress, Inc., 4.15%, 12/1/2044 | 106,765 | ||
100M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 115,844 | ||
100M | Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 4%, 12/15/2044 | 101,745 | ||
100M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 128,523 | ||
100M | South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., 5.45%, 2/1/2041 | 123,701 | ||
576,578 | ||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $6,002,196) | 6,034,473 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—5.7% | ||||
100M | U.S. Treasury Bond, 3.125%, 8/15/2044 | 107,680 | ||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | ||||
500M | 0.085004%, 1/31/2016 † | 499,891 | ||
500M | 1.375%, 12/31/2018 | 498,086 | ||
500M | 0.625%, 1/15/2024 (TIPS) | 511,771 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $1,630,224) | 1,617,428 | |||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | ||||
SECURITIES—3.3% | ||||
Fannie Mae—2.8% | ||||
486M | 3.5%, 8/1/2043 – 11/1/2028 | 515,140 | ||
87M | 4%, 7/1/2041 | 93,108 | ||
184M | 4.5%, 8/1/2041 (b) | 199,890 | ||
808,138 | ||||
Freddie Mac—.5% | ||||
142M | 3.5%, 11/1/2042 – 7/1/2044 | 148,239 | ||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $948,538) | 956,377 |
126 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS—2.7% | |||||||
$100M | Gainesville & Hall Cnty. GA Hosp. Auth. Rev., 4%, 8/15/2046 | $ 100,299 | |||||
100M | Missouri St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth. Hlth. Facs. Rev., | ||||||
4%, 11/15/2045 | 98,685 | ||||||
100M | New Jersey St. Trans. Auth., 4.25%, 6/15/2044 | 100,037 | |||||
25M | Port Authority of NY & NJ, 5%, 10/15/2044 | 27,919 | |||||
100M | Shreveport LA Wtr. & Swr. Rev., 4%, 12/1/2038 | 101,018 | |||||
100M | Virginia St. Hsg. Dev. Auth., 4.666%, 11/1/2044 | 101,862 | |||||
250M | Yale University, Connecticut, 2.086%, 4/15/2019 | 251,477 | |||||
Total Value of Municipal Bonds (cost $767,454) | 781,297 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.1% | |||||||
300M | Fannie Mae, 1.75%, 11/26/2019 (cost $298,802) | 300,391 | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—6.1% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
500M | 0.07%, 1/23/2015 | 499,978 | |||||
750M | 0.045%, 1/27/2015 | 749,976 | |||||
500M | 0.06%, 2/9/2015 | 499,968 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $1,749,922) | 1,749,922 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $26,113,040) | 98.1 | % | 28,056,412 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.9 | 540,061 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $28,596,473 |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 5). | |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis | |
(see Note 1G). | ||
† | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect | |
at December 31, 2014. | ||
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust | |
TIPS | Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities |
127 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
December 31, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of December 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 16,616,524 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 16,616,524 | ||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 6,034,473 | — | 6,034,473 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 1,617,428 | — | 1,617,428 | ||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 956,377 | — | 956,377 | ||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 781,297 | — | 781,297 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 300,391 | — | 300,391 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 1,749,922 | — | 1,749,922 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 16,616,524 | $ | 11,439,888 | $ | — | $ | 28,056,412 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks |
and corporate bonds. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended December 31, | |
2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
128 | See notes to financial statements |
This page left intentionally blank. |
129 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
CASH | EQUITY | FUND FOR | GROWTH & | INVESTMENT | |||||||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | INCOME | INCOME | GOVERNMENT | INCOME | INTERNATIONAL | GRADE | |||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||||||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 11,350,581 | $ | 78,037,329 | $ | 95,699,407 | $ | 29,613,651 | $ | 284,923,223 | $ | 96,445,386 | $ | 58,393,539 | |||||||
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 11,350,581 | $ | 108,241,697 | $ | 93,858,420 | $ | 29,746,480 | $ | 491,155,335 | $ | 130,737,640 | $ | 61,194,473 | |||||||
Cash | 285,338 | 1,369,231 | 3,127,320 | 1,421,161 | 748,069 | 989,147 | 1,167,984 | ||||||||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 247,593 | 122,432 | — | 622,716 | 132,931 | — | ||||||||||||||
Interest and dividends | 80 | 182,456 | 1,408,493 | 122,280 | 618,578 | 209,945 | 821,807 | ||||||||||||||
Trust shares sold | 98 | 273,475 | 225,037 | 63,835 | 195,285 | 176,184 | 78,918 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets | 551 | 4,461 | 4,286 | 1,395 | 20,191 | 5,737 | 2,632 | ||||||||||||||
Total Assets | 11,636,648 | 110,318,913 | 98,745,988 | 31,355,151 | 493,360,174 | 132,251,584 | 63,265,814 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 668,812 | — | 603,572 | 261,449 | 831,124 | — | ||||||||||||||
Trust shares redeemed | 1,645,028 | 18,298 | 6,723 | 7,992 | 145,539 | 14,950 | 12,592 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | — | 73,685 | 66,515 | 16,625 | 326,544 | 89,961 | 34,077 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 14,086 | 16,578 | 23,053 | 16,151 | 30,037 | 41,843 | 16,429 | ||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 1,659,114 | 777,373 | 96,291 | 644,340 | 763,569 | 977,878 | 63,098 | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 9,977,534 | $ | 109,541,540 | $ | 98,649,697 | $ | 30,710,811 | $ | 492,596,605 | $ | 131,273,706 | $ | 63,202,716 | |||||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 9,977,534 | $ | 73,740,755 | $ | 115,466,698 | $ | 30,473,571 | $ | 256,507,358 | $ | 107,291,418 | $ | 60,765,733 | |||||||
Undistributed net investment income | — | 1,821,748 | 4,654,859 | 691,883 | 5,622,557 | 1,462,187 | 1,541,764 | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | |||||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | — | 3,774,669 | (19,630,873 | ) | (587,472 | ) | 24,234,578 | (11,764,982 | ) | (1,905,715 | ) | ||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value | |||||||||||||||||||||
of investments and foreign currency transactions | — | 30,204,368 | (1,840,987 | ) | 132,829 | 206,232,112 | 34,285,083 | 2,800,934 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 9,977,534 | $ | 109,541,540 | $ | 98,649,697 | $ | 30,710,811 | $ | 492,596,605 | $ | 131,273,706 | $ | 63,202,716 | |||||||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding (Note 2) | 9,977,534 | 5,145,368 | 15,104,016 | 3,087,853 | 10,384,781 | 6,288,031 | 5,643,120 | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value, offering and redemption price per share — | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Net assets divided by shares outstanding) | $ | 1.00 | $ | 21.29 | $ | 6.53 | $ | 9.95 | $ | 47.43 | $ | 20.88 | $ | 11.20 |
130 | See notes to financial statements | 131 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
LIMITED | ||||||||||||||||||
DURATION | ||||||||||||||||||
HIGH QUALITY | SELECT | SPECIAL | TARGET | TOTAL | ||||||||||||||
BOND | OPPORTUNITY | GROWTH | SITUATIONS | MATURITY 2015 | RETURN | |||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | ||||||||||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 2,435,883 | $ | 23,394,833 | $ | 29,803,270 | $ | 165,451,747 | $ | 17,065,695 | $ | 26,113,040 | ||||||
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 2,429,475 | $ | 26,659,311 | $ | 42,343,277 | $ | 207,793,175 | $ | 17,768,131 | $ | 28,056,412 | ||||||
Cash | 28,007 | 1,216,609 | 1,124,507 | 1,166,638 | 9,028 | 357,337 | ||||||||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 90,865 | — | — | — | 55,438 | ||||||||||||
Interest and dividends | 2,903 | 13,698 | 22,185 | 163,249 | — | 104,954 | ||||||||||||
Trust shares sold | 160,226 | 206,423 | 186,419 | 99,814 | 1,908 | 531,101 | ||||||||||||
Other assets | 56 | 883 | 1,568 | 8,388 | 914 | 963 | ||||||||||||
Total Assets | 2,620,667 | 28,187,789 | 43,677,956 | 209,231,264 | 17,779,981 | 29,106,205 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||
Payables: | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | 43,059 | 672,347 | — | — | — | 466,140 | ||||||||||||
Trust shares redeemed | — | 757 | 48,476 | 124,334 | 2,593 | 10,235 | ||||||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 1,199 | 17,884 | 29,373 | 139,871 | 9,707 | 18,688 | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 15,150 | 16,952 | 13,344 | 21,550 | 13,753 | 14,669 | ||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 59,408 | 707,940 | 91,193 | 285,755 | 26,053 | 509,732 | ||||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 2,561,259 | $ | 27,479,849 | $ | 43,586,763 | $ | 208,945,509 | $ | 17,753,928 | $ | 28,596,473 | ||||||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 2,569,313 | $ | 24,490,676 | $ | 28,486,460 | $ | 156,252,994 | $ | 15,959,357 | $ | 26,508,026 | ||||||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | (1,646 | ) | 60,296 | 167,049 | 1,331,339 | 884,671 | 204,014 | |||||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | — | (335,601 | ) | 2,393,247 | 9,019,748 | 207,464 | (58,939 | ) | ||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value | ||||||||||||||||||
of investments | (6,408 | ) | 3,264,478 | 12,540,007 | 42,341,428 | 702,436 | 1,943,372 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,561,259 | $ | 27,479,849 | $ | 43,586,763 | $ | 208,945,509 | $ | 17,753,928 | $ | 28,596,473 | ||||||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding (Note 2) | 263,029 | 1,847,033 | 3,039,432 | 6,105,075 | 1,298,892 | 2,325,796 | ||||||||||||
Net asset value, offering and redemption price per share — | ||||||||||||||||||
(Net assets divided by shares outstanding) | $ | 9.74 | $ | 14.88 | $ | 14.34 | $ | 34.22 | $ | 13.67 | $ | 12.30 |
132 | See notes to financial statements | 133 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
Year Ended December 31, 2014
CASH | EQUITY | FUND FOR | GROWTH & | INVESTMENT | |||||||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | INCOME | INCOME | GOVERNMENT | INCOME | INTERNATIONAL | GRADE | |||||||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 8,141 | $ | 2,455 | $ | 5,657,478 | $ | 785,130 | $ | 402 | $ | 926 | $ | 2,124,587 | |||||||
Dividends | — | 2,655,436 | (a) | — | — | 9,333,959 | (b) | 2,684,590 | (c) | — | |||||||||||
Total income | 8,141 | 2,657,891 | 5,657,478 | 785,130 | 9,334,361 | 2,685,516 | 2,124,587 | ||||||||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 4): | |||||||||||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 74,787 | 775,053 | 740,536 | 229,757 | 3,519,369 | 997,772 | 459,370 | ||||||||||||||
Professional fees | 11,665 | 21,749 | 19,315 | 12,813 | 51,443 | 41,380 | 19,117 | ||||||||||||||
Custodian fees and expenses | 6,582 | 7,253 | 18,690 | 9,853 | 20,748 | 128,116 | 10,726 | ||||||||||||||
Reports and notices to shareholders | 2,095 | 12,738 | 13,790 | 4,643 | 52,259 | 15,249 | 8,209 | ||||||||||||||
Registration fees | 432 | 457 | 450 | 452 | 451 | 449 | 448 | ||||||||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 565 | 5,575 | 5,380 | 1,676 | 25,967 | 7,228 | 3,328 | ||||||||||||||
Other expenses | 3,343 | 14,070 | 45,771 | 14,390 | 45,105 | 31,714 | 14,026 | ||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 99,469 | 836,895 | 843,932 | 273,584 | 3,715,342 | 1,221,908 | 515,224 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Expenses waived and/or assumed | (91,060 | ) | — | — | (45,951 | ) | — | — | (91,874 | ) | |||||||||||
Expenses paid indirectly | (268 | ) | (752 | ) | (761 | ) | (364 | ) | (3,537 | ) | — | (405 | ) | ||||||||
Net expenses | 8,141 | 836,143 | 843,171 | 227,269 | 3,711,805 | 1,221,908 | 422,945 | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income | — | 1,821,748 | 4,814,307 | 557,861 | 5,622,556 | 1,463,608 | 1,701,642 | ||||||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | |||||||||||||||||||||
and Foreign Currency Transactions (Note 3): | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investments | — | 3,841,139 | 389,912 | 155,039 | 25,731,545 | 3,004,849 | 1,216,895 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | — | — | (31,421 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and | |||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | — | 3,841,139 | 389,912 | 155,039 | 25,731,545 | 2,973,428 | 1,216,895 | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | — | 2,582,413 | (4,402,351 | ) | 210,134 | 4,161,730 | (1,381,288 | ) | 538,790 | ||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments and | |||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | — | 6,423,552 | (4,012,439 | ) | 365,173 | 29,893,275 | 1,592,140 | 1,755,685 | |||||||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||
from Operations | $ | — | $ | 8,245,300 | $ | 801,868 | $ | 923,034 | $ | 35,515,831 | $ | 3,055,748 | $ | 3,457,327 |
(a) Net of $9,304 foreign taxes withheld
(b) Net of $18,939 foreign taxes withheld
(c) Net of $303,780 foreign taxes withheld
134 | See notes to financial statements | 135 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
Year Ended December 31, 2014
LIMITED | ||||||||||||||||||
DURATION | ||||||||||||||||||
HIGH QUALITY | SELECT | SPECIAL | TARGET | TOTAL | ||||||||||||||
BOND* | OPPORTUNITY | GROWTH | SITUATIONS | MATURITY 2015 | RETURN | |||||||||||||
Investment Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Income: | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 3,915 | $ | 13 | $ | — | $ | 1,573 | $ | 1,026,003 | $ | 155,610 | ||||||
Dividends | 8,168 | 258,426 | (d) | 485,690 | 2,961,564 | — | 243,272 | (e) | ||||||||||
Total income | 12,083 | 258,439 | 485,690 | 2,963,137 | 1,026,003 | 398,882 | ||||||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 4): | ||||||||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 5,744 | 147,753 | 288,054 | 1,523,351 | 144,240 | 155,372 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees | 32,014 | 14,323 | 13,426 | 41,811 | 12,119 | 20,701 | ||||||||||||
Custodian fees and expenses | 1,041 | 24,596 | 2,418 | 12,471 | 4,667 | 9,667 | ||||||||||||
Reports and notices to shareholders | 2,500 | 3,661 | 5,372 | 20,446 | 2,169 | 4,338 | ||||||||||||
Registration fees | 2,000 | 579 | 297 | 432 | 407 | 578 | ||||||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 32 | 997 | 2,048 | 11,024 | 1,068 | 1,048 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses | 2,408 | 6,353 | 7,026 | 23,768 | 5,740 | 8,085 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses | 45,739 | 198,262 | 318,641 | 1,633,303 | 170,410 | 199,789 | ||||||||||||
Less: Expenses waived | (1,149 | ) | — | — | — | (28,848 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Expenses paid indirectly | (6 | ) | (119 | ) | — | (1,504 | ) | (230 | ) | (125 | ) | |||||||
Net expenses | 44,584 | 198,143 | 318,641 | 1,631,799 | 141,332 | 199,664 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | (32,501 | ) | 60,296 | 167,049 | 1,331,338 | 884,671 | 199,218 | |||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||
on Investments (Note 3): | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 233 | (326,693 | ) | 2,393,581 | 9,214,245 | 212,133 | (39,546 | ) | ||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments. | (6,408 | ) | 1,563,896 | 2,427,906 | 1,898,988 | (1,096,401 | ) | 1,077,249 | ||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments | (6,175 | ) | 1,237,203 | 4,821,487 | 11,113,233 | (884,268 | ) | 1,037,703 | ||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting | ||||||||||||||||||
from Operations | $ | (38,676 | ) | $ | 1,297,499 | $ | 4,988,536 | $ | 12,444,571 | $ | 403 | $ | 1,236,921 |
* From July 1, 2014 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2014. |
(d) Net of $518 foreign taxes withheld |
(e) Net of $737 foreign taxes withheld |
136 | See notes to financial statements | 137 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
CASH MANAGEMENT | EQUITY INCOME | FUND FOR INCOME | GOVERNMENT | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,821,748 | $ | 1,693,452 | $ | 4,814,307 | $ | 4,745,407 | $ | 557,861 | $ | 546,194 | ||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and | — | — | 3,841,139 | 5,331,448 | 389,912 | 1,988,045 | 155,039 | (271,900 | ) | |||||||||||||||
futures contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
of investments | — | — | 2,582,413 | 15,610,770 | (4,402,351 | ) | (932,205 | ) | 210,134 | (1,050,919 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | — | — | 8,245,300 | 22,635,670 | 801,868 | 5,801,247 | 923,034 | (776,625 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | — | — | (1,692,596 | ) | (1,722,352 | ) | (5,169,204 | ) | (5,167,402 | ) | (784,013 | ) | (821,479 | ) | ||||||||||
Net realized gains | — | — | (4,129,108 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total distributions | — | — | (5,821,704 | ) | (1,722,352 | ) | (5,169,204 | ) | (5,167,402 | ) | (784,013 | ) | (821,479 | ) | ||||||||||
Trust Share Transactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 42,552,656 | 43,924,902 | 8,118,552 | 7,240,009 | 8,401,510 | 10,029,473 | 2,155,159 | 3,026,404 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 5,821,704 | 1,722,352 | 5,169,204 | 5,167,402 | 784,013 | 821,479 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (43,527,282 | ) | (44,497,316 | ) | (5,450,729 | ) | (5,607,732 | ) | (5,742,002 | ) | (5,036,414 | ) | (2,850,062 | ) | (3,912,565 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from trust share transactions | (974,626 | ) | (572,414 | ) | 8,489,527 | 3,354,629 | 7,828,712 | 10,160,461 | 89,110 | (64,682 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | (974,626 | ) | (572,414 | ) | 10,913,123 | 24,267,947 | 3,461,376 | 10,794,306 | 228,131 | (1,662,786 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 10,952,160 | 11,524,574 | 98,628,417 | 74,360,470 | 95,188,321 | 84,394,015 | 30,482,680 | 32,145,466 | ||||||||||||||||
End of year † | $ | 9,977,534 | $ | 10,952,160 | $ | 109,541,540 | $ | 98,628,417 | $ | 98,649,697 | $ | 95,188,321 | $ | 30,710,811 | $ | 30,482,680 | ||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,821,748 | $ | 1,692,587 | $ | 4,654,859 | $ | 4,675,623 | $ | 691,883 | $ | 784,013 | ||||||||
Trust Shares Issued and Redeemed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 42,552,656 | 43,924,902 | 393,394 | 378,153 | 1,253,054 | 1,500,127 | 218,414 | 301,498 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | — | 296,119 | 100,605 | 780,847 | 793,764 | 80,247 | 81,094 | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (43,527,282 | ) | (44,497,316 | ) | (264,808 | ) | (304,550 | ) | (855,036 | ) | (753,826 | ) | (288,676 | ) | (389,217 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in trust shares outstanding | (974,626 | ) | (572,414 | ) | 424,705 | 174,208 | 1,178,865 | 1,540,065 | 9,985 | (6,625 | ) |
138 | See notes to financial statements | 139 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
LIMITED DURATION | |||||||||||||||||||||
GROWTH & INCOME | INTERNATIONAL | INVESTMENT GRADE | HIGH QUALITY BOND | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | * | |||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 5,622,556 | $ | 5,578,291 | $ | 1,463,608 | $ | 1,519,549 | $ | 1,701,642 | $ | 1,985,511 | $ | (32,501 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gain on investments and | |||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 25,731,545 | 21,689,011 | 2,973,428 | 6,064,283 | 1,216,895 | 752,575 | 233 | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | |||||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 4,161,730 | 105,622,192 | (1,381,288 | ) | 623,668 | 538,790 | (3,197,695 | ) | (6,408 | ) | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 35,515,831 | 132,889,494 | 3,055,748 | 8,207,500 | 3,457,327 | (459,609 | ) | (38,676 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | (5,573,499 | ) | (6,511,151 | ) | (1,447,791 | ) | (1,658,517 | ) | (2,449,388 | ) | (2,247,136 | ) | — | ||||||||
Net realized gains | (3,093,486 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Total distributions | (8,666,985 | ) | (6,511,151 | ) | (1,447,791 | ) | (1,658,517 | ) | (2,449,388 | ) | (2,247,136 | ) | — | ||||||||
Trust Share Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 9,943,269 | 10,668,396 | 5,628,877 | 5,452,191 | 5,433,008 | 6,934,948 | 2,619,930 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 8,666,985 | 6,511,151 | 1,447,791 | 1,658,517 | 2,449,388 | 2,247,136 | — | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (27,285,089 | ) | (26,371,797 | ) | (5,892,325 | ) | (6,963,696 | ) | (4,251,021 | ) | (5,376,721 | ) | (19,995 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) from trust share transactions | (8,674,835 | ) | (9,192,250 | ) | 1,184,343 | 147,012 | 3,631,375 | 3,805,363 | 2,599,935 | ||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 18,174,011 | 117,186,093 | 2,792,300 | 6,695,995 | 4,639,314 | 1,098,618 | 2,561,259 | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 474,422,594 | 357,236,501 | 128,481,406 | 121,785,411 | 58,563,402 | 57,464,784 | — | ||||||||||||||
End of year † | $ | 492,596,605 | $ | 474,422,594 | $ | 131,273,706 | $ | 128,481,406 | $ | 63,202,716 | $ | 58,563,402 | $ | 2,561,259 | |||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | 5,622,557 | $ | 5,573,481 | $ | 1,462,187 | $ | 1,477,791 | $ | 1,541,764 | $ | 1,682,913 | $ | (1,646 | ) | ||||||
Trust Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 218,789 | 264,218 | 265,505 | 269,539 | 490,396 | 626,140 | 265,066 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 197,516 | 185,980 | 69,372 | 82,719 | 226,167 | 201,537 | — | ||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (600,449 | ) | (682,069 | ) | (277,543 | ) | (343,605 | ) | (384,124 | ) | (483,891 | ) | (2,037 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in trust shares outstanding | (184,144 | ) | (231,871 | ) | 57,334 | 8,653 | 332,439 | 343,786 | 263,029 |
*From July 1, 2014 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2014.
140 | See notes to financial statements | 141 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
OPPORTUNITY | SELECT GROWTH | SPECIAL SITUATIONS | TARGET MATURITY 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 60,296 | $ | (38,939 | ) | $ | 167,049 | $ | 125,765 | $ | 1,331,338 | $ | 948,778 | $ | 884,671 | $ | 961,281 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (326,693 | ) | 24,772 | 2,393,581 | 2,889,317 | 9,214,245 | 34,411,827 | 212,133 | 385,833 | |||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
of investments | 1,563,896 | 1,689,676 | 2,427,906 | 5,421,909 | 1,898,988 | 12,833,797 | (1,096,401 | ) | (1,392,216 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 1,297,499 | 1,675,509 | 4,988,536 | 8,436,991 | 12,444,571 | 48,194,402 | 403 | (45,102 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | — | — | (125,761 | ) | (134,084 | ) | (948,767 | ) | (1,691,850 | ) | (961,279 | ) | (1,016,095 | ) | ||||||||||
Net realized gains | (7,787 | ) | — | (41,015 | ) | — | (33,976,971 | ) | (7,848,959 | ) | (383,900 | ) | (325,271 | ) | ||||||||||
Total distributions | (7,787 | ) | — | (166,776 | ) | (134,084 | ) | (34,925,738 | ) | (9,540,809 | ) | (1,345,179 | ) | (1,341,366 | ) | |||||||||
Trust Share Transactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 13,087,780 | 11,208,177 | 5,841,359 | 4,491,084 | 5,127,856 | 4,585,685 | 724,447 | 487,495 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 7,787 | — | 166,776 | 134,084 | 34,925,738 | 9,540,809 | 1,345,179 | 1,341,366 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (532,614 | ) | (285,448 | ) | (2,249,337 | ) | (2,297,644 | ) | (9,841,042 | ) | (11,211,160 | ) | (3,726,820 | ) | (3,984,977 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from trust share transactions | 12,562,953 | 10,922,729 | 3,758,798 | 2,327,524 | 30,212,552 | 2,915,334 | (1,657,194 | ) | (2,156,116 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 13,852,665 | 12,598,238 | 8,580,558 | 10,630,431 | 7,731,385 | 41,568,927 | (3,001,970 | ) | (3,542,584 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 13,627,184 | 1,028,946 | 35,006,205 | 24,375,774 | 201,214,124 | 159,645,197 | 20,755,898 | 24,298,482 | ||||||||||||||||
End of year † | $ | 27,479,849 | $ | 13,627,184 | $ | 43,586,763 | $ | 35,006,205 | $ | 208,945,509 | $ | 201,214,124 | $ | 17,753,928 | $ | 20,755,898 | ||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | 60,296 | $ | — | $ | 167,049 | $ | 125,763 | $ | 1,331,339 | $ | 948,774 | $ | 884,671 | $ | 961,274 | ||||||||
Trust Shares Issued and Redeemed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 915,743 | 887,333 | 437,045 | 406,909 | 151,084 | 129,208 | 52,786 | 33,181 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 552 | — | 12,878 | 13,422 | 1,082,297 | 303,172 | 98,260 | 91,312 | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (37,007 | ) | (21,893 | ) | (168,982 | ) | (205,666 | ) | (291,150 | ) | (326,530 | ) | (267,514 | ) | (268,363 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in trust shares outstanding | 879,288 | 865,440 | 280,941 | 214,665 | 942,231 | 105,850 | (116,468 | ) | (143,870 | ) |
142 | See notes to financial statements | 143 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
TOTAL RETURN | ||||||
Year Ended December 31 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||
Net investment income | $ | 199,218 | $ | 9,564 | ||
Net realized loss on investments | (39,546 | ) | (5,959 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | 1,077,249 | 866,528 | ||||
Net increase in net assets resulting | ||||||
from operations | 1,236,921 | 870,133 | ||||
Dividends to Shareholders | ||||||
Net investment income | (17,034 | ) | — | |||
Trust Share Transactions | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 14,856,310 | 12,224,476 | ||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 17,034 | — | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (939,053 | ) | (719,682 | ) | ||
Net increase from trust share transactions | 13,934,291 | 11,504,794 | ||||
Net increase in net assets | 15,154,178 | 12,374,927 | ||||
Net Assets | ||||||
Beginning of year | 13,442,295 | 1,067,368 | ||||
End of year † | $ | 28,596,473 | $ | 13,442,295 | ||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | 204,014 | $ | 9,540 | ||
Trust Shares Issued and Redeemed | ||||||
Sold | 1,245,483 | 1,113,967 | ||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 1,461 | — | ||||
Redeemed | (78,453 | ) | (64,176 | ) | ||
Net increase in trust shares outstanding | 1,168,491 | 1,049,791 |
144 | See notes to financial statements |
Notes to Financial Statements
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
1. Significant Accounting Policies—First Investors Life Series Funds, a Delaware statutory trust (“the Trust”), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) as an open-end management investment company. The Trust operates as a series fund, issuing shares of beneficial interest in the Cash Management Fund, Equity Income Fund (formerly Value Fund), Fund For Income (formerly High Yield Fund), Government Fund, Growth & Income Fund, International Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Opportunity Fund, Select Growth Fund, Special Situations Fund (formerly Discovery Fund), Target Maturity 2015 Fund and Total Return Fund (each a “Fund”, collectively, “the Funds”), and accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each Fund. The objective of each Fund as of December 31, 2014 is as follows:
Cash Management Fund seeks to earn a high rate of current income consistent with the preservation of capital and maintenance of liquidity.
Equity Income Fund seeks total return.
Fund For Income seeks high current income.
Government Fund seeks to achieve a significant level of current income which is consistent with security and liquidity of principal.
Growth & Income Fund seeks long-term growth of capital and current income.
International Fund primarily seeks long-term capital growth.
Investment Grade Fund seeks to generate a maximum level of income consistent with investment in investment grade debt securities.
Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund seeks current income consistent with low volatility of principal.
Opportunity Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Select Growth Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Special Situations Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Target Maturity 2015 Fund seeks a predictable compounded investment return for investors who hold their Fund shares until the Fund’s maturity, consistent with the preservation of capital.
Total Return Fund seeks high, long-term total investment return consistent with moderate investment risk.
145 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
A. Security Valuation—Except as provided below, a security listed or traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market is valued at its last sale price on the exchange or market where the security is principally traded, and lacking any sales, the security is valued at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices. Securities traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market (including securities listed on exchanges whose primary market is believed to be OTC) are valued at the mean between the last bid and asked prices based on quotes furnished by a market maker for such securities or an authorized pricing service. Fixed Income securities, other than short-term debt securities that mature in 60 days or less and securities held by the Cash Management Fund, are priced based upon valuations that are provided by a pricing service. Other securities may also be priced based upon valuations that are provided by pricing services approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (“the Board”). The pricing services consider security type, rating, market condition and yield data as well as market quotations, prices provided by market makers and other available information in determining value. Short-term debt securities that mature in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost.
The Funds monitor for significant events occurring prior to the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange that could have a material impact on the value of any securities that are held by the Funds. Examples of such events include trading halts, natural disasters, political events and issuer-specific developments. If First Investors Management Company, Inc.’s (“FIMCO”) Valuation Committee decides that such events warrant using fair value estimates, it will take such events into consideration in determining the fair values of such securities. If market quotations or prices are not readily available or determined to be unreliable, the securities will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board. The Funds also use estimates from a pricing service to fair value foreign equity securities in the event that fluctuations in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed. For valuation purposes, where applicable, quotations of foreign securities in foreign currency are translated to U.S. dollar equivalents using the foreign exchange quotation in effect.
The Cash Management Fund values its portfolio securities in accordance with the amortized cost method of valuation under Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act. Amortized cost is an approximation of market value of an instrument, whereby the difference between its acquisition cost and market value at maturity is amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the instrument. The effect of changes in the market value of a security as a result of fluctuating interest rates is not taken into account and thus the amortized cost method of valuation may result in the value of a security being higher or lower than its actual market value.
146 |
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), investments held by the Funds are carried at “fair value”. As defined by ASC 820, fair value is the price that a fund would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment under current market conditions. Various inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds’ investments.
In addition to defining fair value, ASC 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access.
Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available.
Equity securities traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy to the extent that they are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied. Foreign securities that are fair valued in the event that fluctuations in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed are categorized in Level 2. Corporate and municipal bonds, asset backed U.S. Government and U.S. Government Agency securities, loan participations, asset backed securities and pass through certificates are categorized in Level 2 to the extent that the inputs are observable and timely, otherwise they would be categorized as Level 3. Short-term notes that are valued at amortized cost are categorized in Level 2. Foreign exchange contracts that are considered derivative instruments and are valued at the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the instruments are categorized in Level 2. Restricted securities and securities that are fair valued by FIMCO’s Valuation Committee may be categorized in either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy depending on the relative significance of the unobservable valuation inputs.
147 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
The aggregate value by input level, as of December 31, 2014, for each Fund’s investments is included at the end of each Fund’s portfolio of investments.
B. Federal Income Tax—No provision has been made for federal income taxes on net income or capital gains since it is the policy of each Fund to continue to comply with the special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to investment companies, and to make sufficient distributions of income and capital gains (in excess of any available capital loss carryovers), to relieve each Fund from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. At December 31, 2014, capital loss carryovers were as follows:
Not Subject | ||||||||||||||
to Expiration | ||||||||||||||
Fund | Total | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Long Term | Short Term | |||||||
Fund For Income | $ | 19,630,623 | $ | 433,726 | $ | 3,694,844 | $ | 15,502,053 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
Government | 587,472 | 37,942 | — | — | — | — | 549,530 | |||||||
International | 11,232,146 | — | 1,810,164 | 8,389,229 | 1,032,753 | — | — | |||||||
Investment Grade | 1,905,026 | — | 759,925 | 1,145,101 | — | — | — | |||||||
Opportunity | 288,052 | — | — | — | — | — | 288,052 | |||||||
Total Return | 40,068 | — | — | — | — | — | 40,068 |
As a result of the passage of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (“the Modernization Act of 2010”), losses incurred in this fiscal year and beyond retain their character as short-term or long-term, have no expiration date and are utilized prior to capital loss carryovers occurring prior to the enactment of the Modernization Act of 2010.
The Funds recognize the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Funds’ tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years 2011–2013, or expected to be taken in the Funds’ 2014 tax returns. The Funds identify their major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal, New York State, New York City and foreign jurisdictions where the Funds make significant investments; however, the Funds are not aware of any tax position for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months.
C. Foreign Currency Translations and Transactions—The accounting records of the International Fund (the “Fund”) are maintained in U.S. dollars. Portfolio securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities,
148 |
dividend income and certain expenses are translated to U.S. dollars at the prevailing rates of exchange on the respective dates of such transactions.
The Fund does not isolate that portion of gains and losses on investments which is due to changes in foreign exchange rates from that which is due to changes in market prices of the investments. These changes are included with the net realized and unrealized gains and losses from investments.
The Fund may enter into spot currency transactions in connection with the settlement of transactions in securities traded in foreign currency to manage exposure to foreign exchange risk between the trade date and the settlement date of such transactions. The Fund could be exposed to risk if counter parties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts or if the value of the foreign currency changes unfavorably. Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include gains and losses from the sales of spot currency transactions and gains and losses on accrued foreign dividends and related withholding taxes.
D. Distributions to Shareholders—The Separate Accounts, which own the shares of the Funds, will receive all dividends and other distributions by them. All dividends and distributions are reinvested by the Separate Accounts in additional shares of the distributing Funds. Distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized capital gains are generally declared and paid annually on all Funds, except for the Cash Management Fund which declares dividends, if any, from the total of net investment income (plus or minus all realized short-term gains and losses on investments) daily and pays monthly. Dividends from net investment income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences are primarily due to differing treatments for capital loss carryforwards, deferral of wash sale losses, late loss deferrals, post-October capital losses, net operating losses and foreign currency transactions.
E. Expense Allocation—Expenses directly charged or attributable to a Fund are paid from the assets of that Fund. General expenses of the Trust are allocated among and charged to the assets of each Fund on a fair and equitable basis, which may be based on the relative assets of each Fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each Fund.
F. Use of Estimates—The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
149 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G. Other—Security transactions are generally accounted for on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased or sold, except for financial reporting purposes which is trade date. Investments in securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are generally reflected in the assets of the Funds and the Funds segregate assets for these transactions on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased. Cost is determined and gains and losses are based on the identified cost basis for securities for both financial statement and federal income tax purposes. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or for certain foreign dividends, as soon as the Fund becomes aware of the dividends. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. Bond premiums and discounts are accreted or amortized using the interest method. Interest income on zero coupon bonds and step bonds is accrued daily at the effective interest rate. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends have been provided in accordance with the Funds’ understanding of the applicable country’s tax rules and rates. The Bank of New York Mellon, custodian for the Cash Management, Fund For Income, Government, Investment Grade, Limited Duration High Quality Bond and Target Maturity 2015 Funds, may provide credits against custodian charges based on uninvested cash balances of the Funds. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Funds received credits in the amount of $2,034. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. serves as custodian for the Equity Income, Growth & Income, International, Opportunity, Select Growth, Special Situations and Total Return Funds. Certain of the Funds reduced expenses through brokerage service arrangements. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Equity Income, Growth & Income, Opportunity, Special Situations and Total Return Funds’ expenses were reduced by a total of $6,037 under these arrangements.
2. Trust Shares—The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest without par value. The Trust consists of the Funds listed on the cover page, each of which is a separate and distinct series of the Trust. Shares in the Funds are acquired through the purchase of variable annuity or variable life insurance contracts for which a Fund is an investment option.
3. Security Transactions—For the year ended December 31, 2014, purchases and sales (including paydowns on Fund For Income, Government Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, and Total Return Fund) of securities and long-term U.S. Government obligations (excluding short-term U.S. Government obligations, foreign currencies and short-term securities), were as follows:
150 |
Long-Term U.S. | |||||||||
Securities | Government Obligations | ||||||||
Cost of | Proceeds | Cost of | Proceeds | ||||||
Fund | Purchases | of Sales | Purchases | of Sales | |||||
Equity Income | $ 25,849,067 | $ 24,179,967 | $ — | $ — | |||||
Fund For Income | 46,370,754 | 38,381,625 | — | — | |||||
Government | 22,874,051 | 20,966,489 | 8,377,894 | 9,769,482 | |||||
Growth & Income | 102,443,526 | 113,850,614 | — | — | |||||
International | 41,282,240 | 36,501,610 | — | — | |||||
Investment Grade | 30,692,083 | 26,741,829 | — | — | |||||
Limited Duration | |||||||||
High Quality Bond | 2,054,692 | 66,016 | 540,352 | 90,204 | |||||
Opportunity | 18,630,570 | 5,917,914 | — | — | |||||
Select Growth | 17,695,768 | 13,778,115 | — | — | |||||
Special Situations | 81,725,306 | 83,719,137 | — | — | |||||
Target Maturity 2015 | — | 148,949 | — | 2,940,635 | |||||
Total Return | 20,668,297 | 9,262,193 | 2,328,211 | 693,601 |
At December 31, 2014, aggregate cost and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of securities for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Net | |||||||||
Gross | Gross | Unrealized | |||||||
Aggregate | Unrealized | Unrealized | Appreciation | ||||||
Fund | Cost | Appreciation | Depreciation | (Depreciation) | |||||
Equity Income | $ 78,107,648 | $ 31,689,711 | $ 1,555,662 | $ 30,134,049 | |||||
Fund For Income | 96,415,995 | 1,494,258 | 4,051,833 | (2,557,575 | ) | ||||
Government | 29,613,651 | 465,237 | 332,408 | 132,829 | |||||
Growth & Income | 286,448,951 | 210,654,032 | 5,947,648 | 204,706,384 | |||||
International | 96,978,222 | 35,832,425 | 2,073,007 | 33,759,418 | |||||
Investment Grade | 59,479,694 | 2,174,490 | 459,711 | 1,714,779 | |||||
Limited Duration | |||||||||
High Quality Bond | 2,437,529 | 380 | 8,434 | (8,054 | ) | ||||
Opportunity | 23,442,382 | 3,952,709 | 735,780 | 3,216,929 | |||||
Select Growth | 29,803,606 | 12,751,481 | 211,810 | 12,539,671 | |||||
Special Situations | 165,601,612 | 46,878,092 | 4,686,529 | 42,191,563 | |||||
Target Maturity 2015 | 17,070,364 | 697,767 | — | 697,767 | |||||
Total Return | 26,233,343 | 2,313,439 | 490,370 | 1,823,069 |
151 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
4. Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates—Certain officers of the Trust are officers of the Trust’s investment adviser, FIMCO and its transfer agent, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”). Trustees of the Trust who are not officers or directors of FIMCO or its affiliates are remunerated by the Funds. For the year ended December 31, 2014, total trustee fees accrued by the Funds amounted to $65,936.
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides as compensation to FIMCO for each Fund, an annual fee, payable monthly, at the rate of .75% on the first $250 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion. For the year ended December 31, 2014, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $45,951 in advisory fees on Government Fund, $91,874 in advisory fees on Investment Grade Fund, $1,149 in advisory fees on Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund and $28,848 in advisory fees on Target Maturity 2015 Fund. During the year ended December 31, 2014, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $39,375 in advisory fees to limit the Cash Management Fund’s overall expense ratio to .60%. Also, FIMCO has voluntarily waived an additional $35,412 in advisory fees and assumed $16,273 of other Cash Management Fund expenses to prevent a negative yield on the Fund’s shares. For the year ended December 31, 2014, total advisory fees accrued to FIMCO were $9,061,158 of which $242,609 was voluntarily waived by FIMCO as noted above.
Muzinich & Co., Inc. serves as investment subadviser to Fund For Income, Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. serves as investment subadviser to International Fund and Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. serves as investment subadviser to Select Growth Fund. The subadvisers are paid by FIMCO and not by the Funds.
5. Restricted Securities—Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. Unless otherwise noted, 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At December 31, 2014, the Fund For Income held one hundred eighteen 144A securities with an aggregate value of $33,753,306 representing 34.2% of the Fund’s net assets, the Government Fund held one 144A security with a value of $243,087 representing .8%. of the Fund’s net assets, the Investment Grade Fund held twenty-one 144A securities with an aggregate value of $7,941,352 representing 12.6% of the Fund’s net assets and the Total Return Fund held five 144A securities with an aggregate value of $535,673 representing 1.9% of the Fund’s net assets. Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified investors. Unless otherwise noted, these Section 4(2) securities are deemed to be liquid. At
152 |
December 31, 2014, the Cash Management Fund held two Section 4(2) securities with an aggregate value of $999,731 representing 10.0% of the Fund’s net assets. These securities are valued as set forth in Note 1A.
6. Derivatives—Some of the Funds may invest in derivatives such as futures contracts and options on futures contracts (“options”), to increase income, hedge against changes in interest rates or enhance potential return.
The Funds may enter into interest rate futures contracts on U.S. Treasury obligations and options thereon that are traded on a U.S. exchange. An interest rate futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and the purchase by another party of a specified amount of a particular financial instrument (debt security) at a specified price, date, time and place. Such investments may be used for, among other purposes, the purpose of hedging against changes in the value of a Fund’s portfolio securities due to anticipated changes in interest rates and market conditions. A public market exists for interest rate futures contracts covering a number of debt securities, including long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes and three-month U.S. Treasury Bills. No price is paid upon entering into futures contracts. Instead, upon entering into a futures contract, the Funds are required to deposit with their custodian in a segregated account in the name of the futures broker through which the transaction is effected an amount of cash or U.S. Government securities generally equal to 3%-5% or less of the contract value. This amount is known as “initial margin.”
An option on an interest rate futures contract generally gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in a futures contract at a specified exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option. The Funds may purchase put and call options on interest rate futures contracts on U.S. Treasury obligations which are traded on a U.S. exchange as a hedge against changes in interest rates, and may enter into closing transactions with respect to such options to terminate existing positions. There is no guarantee such closing transactions can be effected. When writing a call or put option on a futures contract, margin also must be deposited in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Initial margin on futures contracts is in the nature of a performance bond or good-faith deposit that is returned to a Fund upon termination of the transaction, assuming all obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, a Fund may be required by an exchange to increase the level of its initial margin payment. Subsequent payments, called “variation margin,” to and from the broker, are made on a daily basis as the value of the futures position varies, a process known as “marking to market.” Variation margin does not involve borrowing to finance the futures transactions, but rather represents a daily settlement of a Fund’s obligation to or from a clearing organization. A Fund is also obligated to make initial and variation margin payments when it writes options on futures contracts.
153 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
To the extent that a Fund participates in the futures or options markets, it will incur investment risks and transaction costs to which it would not be subject absent the use of these strategies. The use of these strategies involves certain special risks, including: (1) dependence on the ability of the Funds’ investment adviser, FIMCO to predict correctly movements in the direction of interest rates and securities prices; (2) imperfect correlation between the price of futures contracts and options thereon and movements in the prices of the securities or currencies being hedged; (3) the fact that skills needed to use these strategies are different from those needed to select portfolio securities; (4) the leverage (if any) that is created by investing in the option or futures contract; and (5) the possible absence of a liquid secondary market for any particular instrument at any time. If FIMCO’s prediction of movements in the direction of the securities and interest rate markets is inaccurate, the adverse consequences to that Fund may leave it in a worse position than if such strategies were not used. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Funds had no investments in interest rate futures contracts or options.
7. High Yield Credit Risk —The investments of Fund For Income in high yield securities, whether rated or unrated, may be considered speculative and subject to greater market fluctuations and risks of loss of income and principal than lower-yielding, higher-rated, fixed-income securities. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer may be significantly greater for the holders of high-yielding securities, because such securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.
8. Tax Components of Capital and Distributions to Shareholders—The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:
Distributions | Distributions | |||||||||||
Declared in 2014 | Declared in 2013 | |||||||||||
Ordinary | Long-Term | Ordinary | Long-Term | |||||||||
Fund | Income | Capital Gain | Total | Income | Capital Gain | Total | ||||||
Equity Income | $1,692,587 | $ 4,129,117 | $ 5,821,704 | $1,722,352 | $ — | $1,722,352 | ||||||
Fund For Income | 5,169,204 | — | 5,169,204 | 5,167,402 | — | 5,167,402 | ||||||
Government | 784,013 | — | 784,013 | 821,479 | — | 821,479 | ||||||
Growth & Income | 5,573,482 | 3,093,503 | 8,666,985 | 6,511,151 | — | 6,511,151 | ||||||
International | 1,447,791 | — | 1,447,791 | 1,658,517 | — | 1,658,517 | ||||||
Investment Grade | 2,449,388 | — | 2,449,388 | 2,247,136 | — | 2,247,136 | ||||||
Opportunity | — | 7,787 | 7,787 | — | — | — | ||||||
Select Growth | 125,763 | 41,013 | 166,776 | 134,084 | — | 134,084 | ||||||
Special Situations | 6,191,671 | 28,734,067 | 34,925,738 | 3,382,573 | 6,158,236 | 9,540,809 | ||||||
Target Maturity 2015 | 961,279 | 383,900 | 1,345,179 | 1,016,090 | 325,276 | 1,341,366 | ||||||
Total Return | 17,034 | — | 17,034 | — | — | — |
154 |
As of December 31, 2014, the components of distributable earnings (deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
Total | |||||||||||||||
Undistributed | Accumulated | Capital | Unrealized | Distributable | |||||||||||
Ordinary | Capital | Loss | Appreciation | Earnings | |||||||||||
Fund | Income | Gains | Carryover | (Depreciation) | (Deficit) | * | |||||||||
Equity Income | $1,821,748 | $ 3,844,990 | $ — | $ 30,134,049 | $ 35,800,787 | ||||||||||
Fund For Income | 5,371,197 | — | (19,630,623 | ) | (2,557,575 | ) | (16,817,001 | ) | |||||||
Government | 691,883 | — | (587,472 | ) | 132,829 | 237,240 | |||||||||
Growth & Income | 8,384,207 | 22,998,655 | — | 204,706,384 | 236,089,246 | ||||||||||
International | 1,462,187 | — | (11,232,146 | ) | 33,752,247 | † | 23,982,288 | ||||||||
Investment Grade | 2,627,230 | — | (1,905,026 | ) | 1,714,779 | 2,436,983 | |||||||||
Limited Duration | |||||||||||||||
High Quality Bond | — | — | — | (8,054 | ) | (8,054 | ) | ||||||||
Opportunity | 60,296 | — | (288,052 | ) | 3,216,929 | 2,989,173 | |||||||||
Select Growth | 383,830 | 2,176,802 | — | 12,539,671 | 15,100,303 | ||||||||||
Special Situations | 1,466,725 | 9,034,227 | — | 42,191,563 | 52,692,515 | ||||||||||
Target Maturity 2015 | 884,671 | 212,133 | — | 697,767 | 1,794,571 | ||||||||||
Total Return | 305,446 | — | (40,068 | ) | 1,823,069 | 2,088,447 |
* Differences between book distributable earnings and tax distributable earnings consist primarily of wash sales, foreign currency transactions and amortization of bond premium and discounts.
† Includes currency depreciation for International Fund in the amount of $7,171.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, the following reclassifications were made to reflect permanent differences between book and tax reporting which are primarily due to the differences between book and tax treatment of investments in real estate investment trusts, bond premium amortization, foreign currency transactions, paydowns on securities and expiration of capital loss carryovers.
Undistributed | Accumulated | |||||
Capital | Ordinary | Capital | ||||
Fund | Paid In | Income (Deficit) | Gains (Losses) | |||
Equity Income | $ — | $ 9 | $ (9 | ) | ||
Fund For Income | (823,701 | ) | 334,133 | 489,568 | ||
Government | (177,059 | ) | 134,022 | 43,037 | ||
Growth & Income | — | 19 | (19 | ) | ||
International | — | (31,421 | ) | 31,421 | ||
Investment Grade | — | 606,597 | (606,597 | ) | ||
Limited Duration | ||||||
High Quality Bond | (30,622 | ) | 30,855 | (233 | ) | |
Select Growth | — | (2 | ) | 2 | ||
Special Situations | — | (6 | ) | 6 | ||
Target Maturity 2015 | — | 5 | (5 | ) | ||
Total Return | — | 12,290 | (12,290 | ) |
155 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
December 31, 2014
9. Litigation—The Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds have been named, and have received notice that they may be putative members of the proposed defendant class of shareholders, in a lawsuit filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on November 1, 2010, by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tribune Company (the “Committee”). The Committee is seeking to recover all payments made to beneficial owners of common stock in connection with a leveraged buyout of the Tribune Company (“LBO”), including payments made in connection with a 2007 tender offer into which the Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds tendered their shares of common stock of the Tribune Company. On December 9, 2011, the Blue Chip Fund was reorganized into the Growth & Income Fund pursuant to a Plan of Reorganization and Termination, whereby all of the assets of the Blue Chip Fund were transferred to the Growth & Income Fund, the Growth & Income Fund assumed all of the liabilities of the Blue Chip Fund, including any contingent liabilities with respect to pending or threatened litigation or actions, and shareholders of Blue Chip Fund became shareholders of Growth & Income Fund. The adversary proceeding brought by the Committee has been transferred to the Southern District of New York and administratively consolidated with other similar suits as discussed below. In addition, on June 2, 2011, the Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds were named as defendants in a lawsuit brought in connection with the Tribune Company’s LBO by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for a certain series of Senior Notes, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for a certain series of Senior Notes, and Wilmington Trust Company, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for the PHONES Notes (together, the “Bondholder Plaintiffs”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. The Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds have also been named in a similar suit filed on behalf of participants in Tribune defined-compensation plans (the “Retiree Plaintiffs”). That suit was also initially filed in the Supreme Court of New York but later removed and consolidated in the Southern District of New York with the other Tribune suits. As with the Bondholder Plaintiffs and the Committee, the Retiree Plaintiffs seek to recover payments of the proceeds of the LBO. (Both of these suits have been removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and administratively consolidated with other substantially similar suits against other former Tribune shareholders (the “MDL Proceeding”). On September 23, 2013, the Judge in the MDL Proceeding dismissed various state law constructive fraudulent transfer suits, resulting in the Funds being dismissed from the Bondholder and Retiree Plaintiffs’ actions. On September 30, 2013, counsel for the plaintiffs in those suits appealed the MDL Judge’s dismissal ruling to the Second Circuit. The extent of the Funds’ potential liability in any such actions has not been determined. The Funds have been advised by counsel that the Funds could be held
156 |
liable to return all or part of the proceeds received in any of these actions, as well as interest and court costs, even though the Funds had no knowledge of, or participation in, any misconduct. The Equity Income Fund received proceeds of $376,754 in connection with the LBO, representing 0.34% of its net assets as of December 31, 2014. The Blue Chip Fund received proceeds of $288,456 in connection with the LBO, representing 0.06% of the net assets of Growth & Income Fund as of December 31, 2014. The Equity Income and Growth & Income Funds cannot predict the outcomes of these proceedings, and thus have not accrued any of the amounts sought in the various actions in the accompanying financial statements.
10. Subsequent Events—Subsequent events occurring after December 31, 2014 have been evaluated for potential impact to this report through the date the financial statements were issued. There were no subsequent events to report that would have a material impact on the Funds’ financial statements.
157 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a trust share outstanding, total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each year ended December 31 except as otherwise indicated.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End | Total | End of Year | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Year | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gains | Distributions | of Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | (a) | Income | Expenses | (a) | Income (Loss) | Rate | ||||||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.00 | .00 | % | $12 | .23 | %(b) | .00 | % | 1.04 | % | (.81 | )% | N/A | |||||||||||||
2011 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | .00 | 12 | .13 | (b) | .00 | .99 | (.86 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | .00 | 12 | .12 | (b) | .00 | .99 | (.87 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | .00 | 11 | .10 | (b) | .00 | .99 | (.89 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | .00 | 10 | .08 | (b) | .00 | .99 | (.91 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
EQUITY INCOME FUND(c) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $13.46 | $.31 | $1.58 | $1.89 | $ .29 | $ — | $.29 | $15.06 | 14.32 | % | $ 71 | .86 | % | 2.25 | % | N/A | N/A | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 15.06 | .30 | (.06 | ) | .24 | .31 | — | .31 | 14.99 | 1.53 | 69 | .87 | 1.94 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 14.99 | .38 | 1.29 | 1.67 | .30 | — | .30 | 16.36 | 11.20 | 74 | .87 | 2.37 | N/A | N/A | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 16.36 | .36 | 4.55 | 4.91 | .38 | — | .38 | 20.89 | 30.53 | 99 | .82 | 1.97 | N/A | N/A | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 20.89 | .35 | 1.28 | 1.63 | .36 | .87 | 1.23 | 21.29 | 8.26 | 110 | .81 | 1.76 | N/A | N/A | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
FUND FOR INCOME(d) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $6.24 | $.48 | $ .31 | $.79 | $.49 | — | $.49 | $6.54 | 13.71 | % | $71 | .87 | % | 7.43 | % | N/A | N/A | 71 | % | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 6.54 | .43 | (.07 | ) | .36 | .48 | — | .48 | 6.42 | 5.66 | 74 | .88 | 6.68 | N/A | N/A | 63 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 6.42 | .41 | .42 | .83 | .44 | — | .44 | 6.81 | 13.51 | 84 | .88 | 6.11 | N/A | N/A | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 6.81 | .36 | .09 | .45 | .42 | — | .42 | 6.84 | 6.88 | 95 | .88 | 5.37 | N/A | N/A | 56 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 6.84 | .34 | (.28 | ) | .06 | .37 | — | .37 | 6.53 | .79 | 99 | .85 | 4.88 | N/A | N/A | 41 | |||||||||||||||||
GOVERNMENT FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $10.29 | $.32 | $ .16 | $ .48 | $.42 | — | $.42 | $10.35 | 4.82 | % | $28 | .78 | % | 3.11 | % | .93 | % | 2.96 | % | 54 | % | ||||||||||||
2011 | 10.35 | .28 | .26 | .54 | .36 | — | .36 | 10.53 | 5.41 | 29 | .81 | 2.70 | .96 | 2.55 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 10.53 | .20 | — | .20 | .31 | — | .31 | 10.42 | 1.95 | 32 | .75 | 2.10 | .90 | 1.95 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 10.42 | .18 | (.43 | ) | (.25 | ) | .27 | — | .27 | 9.90 | (2.47 | ) | 30 | .76 | 1.76 | .91 | 1.61 | 118 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.90 | .18 | .13 | .31 | .26 | — | .26 | 9.95 | 3.14 | 31 | .74 | 1.82 | .89 | 1.67 | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||
GROWTH & INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $24.69 | $.50 | $ 3.45 | $ 3.95 | $.27 | $ — | $.27 | $28.37 | 16.19 | % | $207 | .82 | % | 1.91 | % | N/A | N/A | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 28.37 | .44 | .25 | .69 | .50 | — | .50 | 28.56 | 2.37 | 321 | .81 | 1.51 | N/A | N/A | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 28.56 | .61 | 4.35 | 4.96 | .44 | — | .44 | 33.08 | 17.45 | 357 | .80 | 1.87 | N/A | N/A | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 33.08 | .53 | 11.89 | 12.42 | .61 | — | .61 | 44.89 | 38.06 | 474 | .79 | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 44.89 | .54 | 2.82 | 3.36 | .53 | .29 | .82 | 47.43 | 7.65 | 493 | .78 | 1.18 | N/A | N/A | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
158 | 159 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End | Total | End of Year | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
of Year | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gains | Distributions | of Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | (a) | Income (Loss) | Expenses | (a) | Income | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $14.72 | $.34 | $1.64 | $1.98 | $ — | — | $— | $16.70 | 13.45 | % | $109 | .99 | % | 2.15 | % | N/A | N/A | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 16.70 | .39 | (.29 | ) | .10 | .36 | — | .36 | 16.44 | .64 | 106 | .96 | 2.26 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 16.44 | .28 | 3.12 | 3.40 | .27 | — | .27 | 19.57 | 20.85 | 122 | .94 | 1.53 | N/A | N/A | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 19.57 | .24 | 1.08 | 1.32 | .27 | — | .27 | 20.62 | 6.77 | 128 | .92 | 1.21 | N/A | N/A | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 20.62 | .23 | .26 | .49 | .23 | — | .23 | 20.88 | 2.39 | 131 | .92 | 1.10 | N/A | N/A | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $10.35 | $.51 | $.41 | $.92 | $.53 | — | $.53 | $10.74 | 9.26 | % | $43 | .73 | % | 4.62 | % | .88 | % | 4.47 | % | 55 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 10.74 | .47 | .17 | .64 | .52 | — | .52 | 10.86 | 6.23 | 47 | .71 | 4.17 | .86 | 4.02 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 10.86 | .43 | .76 | 1.19 | .48 | — | .48 | 11.57 | 11.23 | 57 | .70 | 3.73 | .85 | 3.58 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.57 | .42 | (.51 | ) | (.09 | ) | .45 | — | .45 | 11.03 | (.80 | ) | 59 | .70 | 3.49 | .85 | 3.34 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 11.03 | .42 | .21 | .63 | .46 | — | .46 | 11.20 | 5.86 | 63 | .69 | 2.78 | .84 | 2.63 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 ^ | $10.00 | $(.13 | ) | $(.13 | ) | $(.26 | ) | — | — | — | $9.74 | (2.60 | )%† | $3 | 5.82 | %†† | (4.25 | )%†† | 5.97 | %†† | (4.40 | )%†† | 11 | %† | |||||||||||||
OPPORTUNITY FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 ■ | $10.00 | $(.05 | ) | $.11 | $.06 | — | $ — | $ — | $10.06 | .60 | %† | $1 | 16.84 | %†† | (13.27 | )%†† | N/A | N/A | 0 | %† | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 10.06 | (.04 | ) | 4.06 | 4.02 | — | — | — | 14.08 | 39.96 | 14 | 2.28 | (.79 | ) | N/A | N/A | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 14.08 | .03 | .78 | .81 | — | .01 | .01 | 14.88 | 5.73 | 27 | 1.01 | .31 | N/A | N/A | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SELECT GROWTH FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $6.66 | $.01 | $1.39 | $1.40 | $.01 | $ — | $.01 | $ 8.05 | 21.10 | % | $14 | .98 | % | .20 | % | N/A | N/A | 87 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 8.05 | .01 | .41 | .42 | .01 | — | .01 | 8.46 | 5.25 | 18 | .90 | .07 | N/A | N/A | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 8.46 | .05 | 1.08 | 1.13 | .01 | — | .01 | 9.58 | 13.30 | 24 | .87 | .61 | N/A | N/A | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 9.58 | .04 | 3.12 | 3.16 | .05 | — | .05 | 12.69 | 33.15 | 35 | .85 | .43 | N/A | N/A | 64 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 12.69 | .05 | 1.66 | 1.71 | .05 | .01 | .06 | 14.34 | 13.53 | 44 | .83 | .43 | N/A | N/A | 37 |
160 | 161 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End | Total | End of Year | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||||
of Year | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gains | Distributions | of Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | (a) | Income (Loss) | Expenses | (a) | Income | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND(e) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $25.02 | $.16 | $6.43 | $6.59 | $.22 | $ — | $ .22 | $31.39 | 26.57 | % | $152 | .83 | % | .59 | % | N/A | N/A | 64 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 31.39 | .20 | .51 | .71 | .16 | — | .16 | 31.94 | 2.24 | 150 | .81 | .61 | N/A | N/A | 59 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 31.94 | .34 | 2.88 | 3.22 | .20 | 3.39 | 3.59 | 31.57 | 10.01 | 160 | .81 | 1.07 | N/A | N/A | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 31.57 | .19 | 9.11 | 9.30 | .34 | 1.56 | 1.90 | 38.97 | 30.88 | 201 | .82 | .53 | N/A | N/A | 108 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 38.97 | .22 | 1.82 | 2.04 | .18 | 6.61 | 6.79 | 34.22 | 6.30 | 209 | .80 | .66 | N/A | N/A | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||
TARGET MATURITY 2015 FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $15.45 | $.63 | $ .66 | $1.29 | $.64 | $.08 | $.72 | $16.02 | 8.58 | % | $28 | .71 | % | 3.87 | % | .86 | % | 3.72 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 16.02 | .65 | .44 | 1.09 | .62 | .22 | .84 | 16.27 | 7.14 | 26 | .72 | 3.87 | .87 | 3.72 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 16.27 | .66 | (.53 | ) | .13 | .66 | .16 | .82 | 15.58 | .84 | 24 | .73 | 4.00 | .88 | 3.85 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 15.58 | .70 | (.72 | ) | (.02 | ) | .68 | .22 | .90 | 14.66 | (.20 | ) | 21 | .75 | 4.28 | .90 | 4.13 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 14.66 | .71 | (.71 | ) | — | .71 | .28 | .99 | 13.67 | .03 | 18 | .74 | 4.60 | .89 | 4.45 | 0 | |||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 ■ | $10.00 | $(.05 | ) | $ (.02 | ) | $ (.07 | ) | $ — | — | $ — | $ 9.93 | (.70 | )%† | $ 1 | 16.99 | %†† | (14.84 | )% †† | N/A | N/A | 64 | %† | |||||||||||||
2013 | 9.93 | — | 1.69 | 1.69 | — | — | — | 11.62 | 17.02 | 13 | 1.93 | .16 | N/A | N/A | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 11.62 | .09 | .60 | .69 | .01 | — | .01 | 12.30 | 5.97 | 29 | .96 | .96 | N/A | N/A | 53 | ||||||||||||||||||||
* The effect of fees and charges incurred at the separate account level are not reflected in these performance figures.
** Net of expenses waived or assumed by the investment adviser (Note 4).
† Not annualized Annualized
(a) The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the Bank of New York Mellon or from brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G).
(b) FIMCO voluntarily waived advisory fees to limit the Fund’s overall expense ratio to .60% for the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014. Also, during the period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014, FIMCO waived additional advisory fees and assumed other expenses to prevent a negative yield on the Funds’ shares (Note 4).
(c) Prior to September 4, 2012, known as Value Fund.
(d) Prior to December 17, 2012, known as High Yield Fund.
(e) Prior to December 17, 2012, known as Discovery Fund.
^ For the period July 1, 2014 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2014.
■ For the period December 17, 2012 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2012.
See notes to financial statements | ||
162 | 163 |
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
First Investors Life Series Funds
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of the thirteen Funds comprising First Investors Life Series Funds, including the portfolios of investments, as of December 31, 2014, the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the periods indicated thereon, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated thereon. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Life Series Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2014, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. Where brokers have not replied to our confirmation requests, we have carried out other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the twelve Funds comprising First Investors Life Series Funds, as of December 31, 2014, and the results of their operations, changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Tait, Weller & Baker LLP | |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | |
February 26, 2015 |
164 |
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
Trustees and Officers*
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position(s) | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES | ||||
Susan E. Artmann (1954) | Trustee | Since 11/1/12 | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Retired. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HSBC Insurance North America (2012-2013); | ||||
Executive Vice President and President of HSBC Taxpayer Financial Services (2008-2011). | ||||
Mary J. Barneby (1952) | Trustee | Since 11/1/12 | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, Girl Scouts of Connecticut (since October 2012); Executive Director of UBS Financial | ||||
Services, Inc. and Head of Stamford Private Wealth Office (2002-2012). | ||||
Charles R. Barton, III (1965) | Trustee | Since 1/1/06 | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Operating Officer (since 2007), Board Director (since 1989, currently Ex-Officio) and Trustee (since 1994) | ||||
of The Barton Group/Barton Mines Corporation (mining and industrial abrasives distribution); President of Noe | ||||
Pierson Corporation (land holding and management services provider) (since 2004). | ||||
Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. (1941) | Trustee | Trustee since | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | and Chairman | 1/1/06 and | ||
Legal Department | Chairman | |||
40 Wall Street | since 1/1/13 | |||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
None/Retired |
165 |
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
Trustees and Officers* (continued)
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Mark R. Ward (1952) | Trustee | Since 1/1/10 | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Self-employed, consultant (since 2008). | ||||
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES | ||||
William Lipkus** (1964) | President | Since 6/27/14 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (since 2012), Treasurer (1999-2013), Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(1997-2013) and Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of First Investors Consolidated Corporation; Direc- | ||||
tor (since 2007), Chairman (since 2012), Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(1998-2013) of First Investors Management Company, Inc.; Director (since 2011), Chairman (since 2012), Chief | ||||
Financial Officer (1998-2013), Treasurer (1999-2013) and Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of First | ||||
Investors Corporation; Chairman (since 2012), Directors (since 2007), Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014), | ||||
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (1998-2013) of Administrative Data Management Corp.; Director and | ||||
Chairman (since 2012), Vice President (1996-2014), Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (1996-2013) and | ||||
Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of First Investors Life Insurance Company; and Board of Managers and | ||||
Chairman (since 2012) and Chief Financial Officer (2012-2013) of First Investors Advisory Services, LLC. |
166 |
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
OFFICERS WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Joseph I. Benedek (1957) | Treasurer | Since 1988 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Management Company, Inc. | ||||
Raritan Plaza I | ||||
Edison, NJ 08837 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Treasurer of First Investors Management Company, Inc. | ||||
Mary Carty (1950) | Secretary | Since 2010 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
General Counsel of First Investors Management Company, Inc. and various affiliated companies (since | ||||
December 2012); Assistant Counsel of First Investors Management Company, Inc., (2010-2012). | ||||
Marc S. Milgram (1957) | Chief | Since 2010 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | Compliance | |||
Legal Department | Officer | |||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Investment Compliance Manager of First Investors Management Company, Inc., (2009-2010); First Investors | ||||
Federal Savings Bank, President (2000-2011), Treasurer (1987-2011) and Director (2004-2011); and First | ||||
Investors Name Saver, Inc. f/k/a/ School Financial Management Services, Inc., Treasurer (1992-2011). |
*Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term with the Funds, until his/her successor is elected.
**Effective June 27, 2014, Mr. William Lipkus became President of the Funds. Mr. Derek Burke resigned as President effective June 27, 2014.
167 |
FIRST INVESTORS LIFE SERIES FUNDS
Shareholder Information | |
Investment Adviser | Custodian |
First Investors Management | (Cash Management, Fund For Income, |
Company, Inc. | Government, Investment Grade, Limited |
40 Wall Street | Duration High Quality Bond and Target |
New York, NY 10005 | Maturity 2015 Funds) |
The Bank of New York Mellon | |
Subadviser | One Wall Street |
(Fund For Income) | New York, NY 10286 |
Muzinich & Co., Inc. | |
450 Park Avenue | Custodian |
New York, NY 10022 | (Equity Income, Growth & Income, |
International, Opportunity, Select Growth, | |
Subadviser | Special Situations and Total Return Funds) |
(International Fund) | Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. |
Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. | 50 Post Office Square |
1540 Broadway | Boston, MA 02110 |
New York, NY 10036 | |
Transfer Agent | |
Subadviser | Administrative Data Management Corp. |
(Select Growth Fund) | Raritan Plaza I – 8th Floor |
Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. | Edison, NJ 08837-3920 |
100 Crescent Court | |
Dallas, TX 75201 | Independent Registered |
Public Accounting Firm | |
Tait, Weller & Baker LLP | |
1818 Market Street – 24th Floor | |
Philadelphia, PA 19103 | |
Legal Counsel | |
K&L Gates LLP | |
1601 K Street, N.W. | |
Washington, D.C. 20006 |
168 |
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to a portfolio’s securities is available, without charge, upon request by calling toll free 1-800-423-4026 or can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR database on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) internet website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026 and on the SEC’s internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC on Form N-Q for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Funds’ Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The schedule of portfolio holdings is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026.
There are a variety of risks associated with investing in variable life and annuity subaccounts. For all subaccounts, there is the risk that securities selected by the portfolio manager may perform differently than the overall market or may not meet the portfolio manager’s expectations. For stock subaccounts, the risks include market risk (the risk that the entire stock market will decline because of an event such as a deterioration in the economy or a rise in interest rates), as well as special risks associated with investing in certain types of stock subaccounts such as small-cap, global or international funds. For bond subaccounts, the risks include interest rate risk and credit risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that bonds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. As a general matter, bonds with longer maturities fluctuate more than bonds with shorter maturities in reaction to changes in interest rates. Credit risk is the risk that bonds will decline in value as the result of a decline in the credit rating of the bonds or the economy as a whole, or that the issuer will be unable to pay interest and/or principal when due. There are also special risks associated with investing in certain types of bond subaccounts, including liquidity risk and prepayment and extension risk. You should consult the Funds’ prospectus for a precise explanation of the risks associated with your subaccounts.
169 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics
As of December 31, 2014, the Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer. On July 22, 2014 revisions were made to the code of ethics to reflect the appointment of a new President of the First Investors Funds.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, there were no waivers granted from a provision of the code of ethics.
A copy of the Registrant's code of ethics is filed under Item 12(a)(1).
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
During the reporting period the Registrant's Board determined that it had at least one "audit committee financial expert" serving on its audit committee. Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. and Mark R. Ward were the "audit committee financial experts" during all or part of the period and were considered to be "independent" as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||
----------------- | ||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||
---- | ---- | |||||||||||
(a) Audit Fees | $ | 137,350 | $ | 127,400 | ||||||||
(b) Audit-Related Fees | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
(c) Tax Fees | $ | 45,500 | $ | 41,400 | ||||||||
Nature of services: tax returns preparation and tax compliance | ||||||||||||
(d) All Other Fees | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
(e)(1) Audit committee's pre-approval policies
The Charter of the Audit Committee requires the Audit Committee (a) to pre-approve, and to recommend to the full Board, the selection, retention or termination of the independent auditors to provide audit, review or attest services to the First Investors Funds (“Funds”) and, in connection therewith, evaluate the independence of the auditors and to obtain the auditors’ specific representations as to their independence; (b) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided to the Funds by the independent auditor; and (c) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided by the Funds’ independent auditor to the Funds’ investment adviser or to any entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Funds’ investment adviser and that provides ongoing services to the Funds, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds. The Audit Committee has not adopted pre-approval policies or procedures to permit the services in (b) and (c) above to be pre-approved by other means.
(e)(2) None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Registrant and Related Entities disclosed above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).
(f) Not Applicable
(g) Aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Registrant's accountant for services rendered to the Registrant and the Registrant's investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant for the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were $216,000 and $162,600, respectively.
(h) Not Applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies & Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no material changes to the procedure by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant's Board of Trustees.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Registrant's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) There were no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a)(1) Code of Ethics - Filed herewith
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Filed herewith
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Filed herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
First Investors Life Series Funds
By | /S/ WILLIAM LIPKUS |
William Lipkus | |
President and Principal Executive Officer | |
Date: | February 26, 2015 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /S/ WILLIAM LIPKUS |
William Lipkus | |
President and Principal Executive Officer | |
By | /S/ JOSEPH I. BENEDEK |
Joseph I. Benedek | |
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | |
Date: | February 26, 2015 |