UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: (811- 04345 )
Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: Putnam Tax Free Income Trust
Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Name and address of agent for service: | Beth S. Mazor, Vice President |
| One Post Office Square |
| Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|
Copy to: | John W. Gerstmayr, Esq. |
| Ropes & Gray LLP |
| One International Place |
| Boston, Massachusetts 02110 |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 292-1000
Date of fiscal year end: July 31, 2007
Date of reporting period: August 1, 2006— January 31, 2007
Item 1. Report to Stockholders:
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:
What makes Putnam different?
In 1830, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Samuel Putnam established The Prudent Man Rule, a legal foundation for responsible money management.
THE PRUDENT MAN RULE
All that can be required of a trustee to invest is that he shall conduct himself faithfully and exercise a sound discretion. He is to observe how men of prudence, discretion, and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the permanent disposition of their funds, considering the probable income, as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested.
A time-honored tradition
in money management
Since 1937, our values have been rooted in a profound sense of responsibility for the money entrusted to us.
A prudent approach to investing
We use a research-driven team approach to seek consistent, dependable, superior investment results over time, although there is no guarantee a fund will meet its objectives.
Funds for every investment goal
We offer a broad range of mutual funds and other financial products so investors and their financial representatives can build diversified portfolios.
A commitment to doing
what’s right for investors
We have below-average expenses and stringent investor protections, and provide a wealth of information about the Putnam funds.
Industry-leading service
We help investors, along with their financial representatives, make informed investment decisions with confidence.
Putnam
AMT-Free Insured
Municipal Fund
1| 31| 07
Semiannual Report
Message from the Trustees | 2 |
About the fund | 4 |
Report from the fund managers | 7 |
Performance | 12 |
Expenses | 15 |
Portfolio turnover | 17 |
Risk | 18 |
Your fund’s management | 19 |
Terms and definitions | 22 |
Trustee approval of management contract | 24 |
Other information for shareholders | 29 |
Financial statements | 30 |
Cover photograph: © Richard H. Johnson
Message from the Trustees
Dear Fellow Shareholder
Although the global economy continues to move forward, it has become apparent over the past few months that certain sectors of the U.S. economy may have slowed somewhat. We consequently consider slower job growth and perhaps a rise in the unemployment rate as possible developments for 2007. On the other hand, since the Federal Reserve (the Fed) stopped raising interest rates, stock prices have moved higher, bond yields have remained relatively low, and the weaker dollar appears to be making U.S. exports more competitive. With the benefit of this financial cushion, we believe 2007 may hold the potential for a renewed economic expansion.
As you may have heard, on February 1, 2007, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to sell its ownership interest in Putnam Investments Trust, the parent company of Putnam Management and its affiliates, to Great-West Lifeco Inc. Great-West Lifeco Inc. is a financial services holding company with operations in Canada, the United States, and Europe and is a member of the Power Financial Corporation group of companies. This transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and other conditions, including the approval of new management contracts by shareholders of a substantial number of Putnam funds at shareholder meetings expected to be held in May 2007. Proxy solicitation materials related to these meetings, which provide detailed information regarding the proposed transaction, were recently mailed. The transaction is currently expected to be completed by the middle of 2007.
Putnam’s team of investment and business professionals will continue to be led by Putnam President and Chief Executive Officer Ed Haldeman. Your Trustees have been actively involved through every step of the discussions, and we will continue in our role of overseeing the Putnam funds on your behalf.
2
We would like to take this opportunity to announce that a new independent Trustee, Kenneth R. Leibler, has joined your fund’s Board of Trustees. Mr. Leibler has had a distinguished career as a leader in the investment management industry. He is the founding Chairman of the Boston Options Exchange and currently serves as a Trustee of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston; a lead director of Ruder Finn Group, a global communications and advertising firm; and a director of Northeast Utilities.
In the following pages, members of your fund’s management team discuss the fund’s performance and strategies for the fiscal period ended January 31, 2007, and provide their outlook for the months ahead. As always, we thank you for your support of the Putnam funds.
Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund:
seeking high current income free from federal taxes
Municipal bonds have long been popular investments because they provide income exempt from federal tax, though capital gains are taxable. Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund seeks income exempt from traditional income tax as well as from the alternative minimum tax, or AMT.
The AMT is a federal tax that operates in tandem with the regular income tax system. Taxpayers subject to the AMT must pay a larger amount in tax determined by AMT rules — and the difference can be thousands of dollars for many with household incomes above $150,000. It is estimated that by 2010, nearly every household with an income of $100,000 or more will be paying the AMT, unless the federal government changes the law.
If you are subject to the AMT, investments that could increase your tax liability include private-activity municipal bonds, which back development projects such as housing and resource recovery projects.
Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund aims to serve investors subject to the AMT. The fund seeks to avoid bonds whose income would be taxable under AMT rules, though income may be subject to state taxes.
The fund’s portfolio team of four professionals, with a combined 55 years of experience, researches the municipal market to avoid buying bonds subject to the AMT. Pursuing the fund’s mandate, they also keep the fund invested in high-quality bonds, favoring bonds that are insured or carry AAA ratings, or whose payments are backed by U.S. Treasuries. The team’s goal is to provide an attractive level of income exempt from all federal taxes.
Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses. Tax-free funds may not be suitable for IRAs and other non-taxable accounts. Please consult your tax advisor for more information. Shares of this fund are not insured, and their prices will fluctuate with market conditions.
Understanding the AMT
The AMT is a separate, parallel federal income tax system, with two marginal tax rates, 26% and 28%, and different exemption amounts.
Under AMT rules, certain exclusions, exemptions, deductions, and credits that would reduce your regular taxable income are not allowed. You must “adjust” your regular taxable income to arrive at your alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI). Then, after subtracting your AMT exemption amount, if your AMT liability is greater than your regular tax liability, you must pay both your regular tax and the difference. It’s important to understand that a higher level of income will not necessarily cause you to owe AMT. Rather, it is the relationship between your income and various trigger items, such as credits and deductions, that determines your AMT liability.
Managing this relationship can help avoid a costly surprise at tax time. Any number of items may trigger the tax, but large capital gains, personal exemptions, and deductions are the worst culprits.
Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund invests mainly in bonds that are insured as to payment of principal and interest, escrowed by securities guaranteed by the U.S. government, and/or rated AAA (or the equivalent), which is the highest credit rating available. The fund is intended — and may be appropriate — for investors seeking high current income free from federal income tax.
Highlights
• For the six-month period ended January 31, 2007, Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund’s class A shares returned 2.54% without sales charges.
• The fund’s benchmark, the Lehman Municipal Bond Index, returned 3.06% .
• The average return for the fund’s Lipper category, Insured Municipal Debt Funds, was 2.68% .
• Additional fund performance, comparative performance, and Lipper data can be found in the performance section beginning on page 12.
Performance
Total return for class A shares for periods ended 1/31/07
Since the fund’s inception (9/9/85), average annual return is 6.62% at NAV and 6.43% at POP.*
| Average annual return | Cumulative return |
| NAV | POP | NAV | POP |
|
10 years | 4.85% | 4.45% | 60.57% | 54.60% |
|
5 years | 4.40 | 3.60 | 24.00 | 19.34 |
|
3 years | 3.15 | 1.85 | 9.76 | 5.64 |
|
1 year | 3.20 | -0.60 | 3.20 | -0.60 |
|
6 months | — | — | 2.54 | -1.26 |
|
Data is historical. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Returns at POP reflect a maximum sales charge of 3.75% . For the most recent month-end performance, visit www.putnam.com. For a portion of the period, this fund limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower. A 1% short-term trading fee may apply.
* Performance for class A shares before their inception (9/20/93) is derived from the historical performance of class B shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge, but not adjusted to reflect the lower operating expenses of class A shares.
6
Report from the fund managers
The period in review
The bond market rallied during the six-month period ended January 31, 2007. The Fed’s August 2006 decision to pause in its two-year campaign of interest-rate tightening fueled the rally, as did continued evidence of relatively benign inflation. However, in the final months of the period, surprisingly solid economic growth prompted investor concern about the possibility of an interest-rate increase on the part of the Fed. In this environment, your fund’s results at net asset value (NAV, or without sales charges) lagged the results of its benchmark and were in line with the average return of funds in its Lipper peer group. The fund’s defensive duration strategy, intended to protect the value of the portfolio in the face of rising interest rates, was a primary contributor to its underperformance relative to its benchmark, as interest rates actually fell modestly. In addition, the benchmark includes bonds from all tiers of the inve stment-grade portion of the municipal bond market, and during the period, bonds from the lower-quality tiers delivered stronger performance than the highest-quality, insured securities that make up the fund’s portfolio.
Market overview
Just as the fiscal year began in August 2006, the Fed suspended its credit-tightening program, which had produced 17 successive increases in the federal funds rate since June 30, 2004. Over the course of the past six months, the Fed has held this benchmark rate —the rate for overnight loans between banks — steady at 5.25% . Recent statements from the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy-setting panel, indicate that future rate decisions will depend on whether inflation remains in check.
As the market responded to the Fed’s pause, bond yields declined across the maturity spectrum. This resulted in an impressive rally, especially among long-term bonds. In fact, because yields on longer-term bonds declined more than yields on shorter-term bonds, the yield curve — a graphical representation of
7
how yields of comparable-quality bonds differ by maturity range — flattened. A flatter yield curve means a smaller yield differential between long-term and short-term bonds. Tax-exempt bonds with shorter maturities underperformed taxable bonds in comparable maturity ranges, but long-term tax-exempt bonds outperformed comparable taxable bonds modestly.
A generally robust economy, coupled with solid demand from buyers searching for higher yields, contributed to the strong relative performance of lower-rated bonds. Among uninsured bonds in general and especially bonds rated Baa and below, yield spreads tightened as lower-rated bonds performed better than higher-rated bonds. Non-rated bonds also rallied.
Market sectors that performed particularly well during the period included airline-related industrial development bonds (IDBs); securities issued by hospitals, utilities, and long-term care facilities; and land-secured bonds. Tobacco settlement bonds, meanwhile, underperformed other credit-sensitive sectors modestly, but still outperformed higher-rated bonds.
Strategy overview
Given our expectation for rising interest rates, we maintained a short (defensive) portfolio duration relative to the fund’s benchmark and Lipper peer group. Duration is a measure of a fund’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Having a shorter-duration portfolio may help protect principal when interest
Market sector performance
These indexes provide an overview of performance in different market sectors for the six months ended 1/31/07.
Bonds | |
|
Lehman Municipal Bond Index (tax-exempt bonds) | 3.06% |
|
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index (broad bond market) | 3.65% |
|
Lehman GNMA Index (Government National Mortgage Association bonds) | 3.70% |
|
Lehman Global Aggregate Bond Index (international bonds) | 2.21% |
|
Equities | |
|
S&P 500 Index (broad stock market) | 13.75% |
|
Russell 2000 Index (small-company stocks) | 14.95% |
|
MSCI EAFE Index (international stocks) | 14.33% |
|
8
rates rise, but it can reduce appreciation potential when rates fall. Our strategy detracted moderately from results, since bonds with longer maturities generally outperformed those with shorter maturities. In light of the changing interest-rate environment, by the end of the period we had extended the fund’s duration from its shortest point achieved mid-period but still maintained a slightly short position relative to our benchmark.
We have increased our use of derivative securities, such as interest-rate swap contracts, to execute the fund’s investment strategy. By enabling two parties to exchange, or swap, interest-rate payments at a future date, these contracts give us more control over the fund’s exposure to the upward and downward movement of interest rates without requiring an exchange of principal. The use of these derivatives lets us take positions that reflect our views on yield curve trends without needing to sell bonds we would like to retain and can also reduce the fund’s transaction costs. This, in turn, increases our flexibility in managing the fund. During the period, our interest-rate swap positions detracted moderately from performance, but we nevertheless believe that the flexibility offered by such arrangements makes derivatives a valuable tool in our overall manag ement strategy.
Relative to the fund’s peer group, we maintained an overweight position in single-family housing bonds. This strategy proved helpful to results as declining mortgage prepayments and investor demand for yield continued to support bonds in this sector.
Comparison of the fund’s maturity and duration
This chart compares changes in the fund’s average effective maturity (a weighted average of the holdings’ maturities) and its average effective duration (a measure of its sensitivity to interest-rate changes).
Average effective duration and average effective maturity take into account put and call features, where applicable, and reflect prepayments for mortgage-backed securities. Duration is usually shorter than maturity because it reflects interest payments on a bond prior to its maturity.
9
Your fund’s holdings
Successful sector and security selection contributed to relative results during the fiscal period. The fund’s holdings in the single-family housing sector performed well, as mortgage prepayment rates fell. In October 2006, we expanded the fund’s exposure to single-family mortgage revenue bonds with a purchase of bonds issued by the Alabama Housing Finance Authority. These bonds are scheduled to mature in 2037. As with any mortgage-backed security, these purchases involved extensive analysis of the cash flows of the underlying mortgages to assess and manage prepayment risk.
Another notable purchase were sales and use tax revenue bonds issued by the city of Springdale, Arkansas. They carry a maturity date of 2024 and an active “sinking fund” similar to that of a single-family housing bond. A sinking fund is a separate custodial account in which money can accumulate on a regular basis for the purpose of redeeming the bond. This sinking fund allowed for attractive pricing on the bond because the possibility of prepayment makes its duration much shorter than its maturity would otherwise indicate.
Please note that the holdings discussed in this report may not have been held by the fund for the entire period. Portfolio composition is subject to review in accordance with the fund’s investment strategy and may vary in the future.
Credit quality overview
Credit qualities shown as a percentage of portfolio value as of 1/31/07. A bond rated Baa or higher (MIG3/VMIG3 or higher, for short-term debt) is considered investment grade. The chart reflects Moody’s ratings; percentages may include bonds not rated by Moody’s but considered by Putnam Management to be of comparable quality. Ratings will vary over time.
10
The outlook for your fund
The following commentary reflects anticipated developments that could affect your fund over the next six months, as well as your management team’s plans for responding to them.
We continue to monitor indications of Fed policy and how they are likely to affect efforts to engineer a “soft landing” for the economy. A soft landing occurs when economic growth slows but is still solid enough to sustain job creation and corporate profits. Therefore, while we anticipate that economic growth is likely to slow as we move further into 2007, we plan to maintain a defensive duration strategy until longer-range Fed policy becomes clearer. In addition, given the municipal bond market’s exceptionally strong performance relative to Treasuries throughout the period, valuations have become elevated to levels that, we believe, argue in favor of taking a defensive approach over the near term. In other words, we believe our current priority should be working to preserve what the fund has gained during this period, rather than to concentrate our efforts on seeking greater gains — particularly since the latter dire ction would increase the fund’s risk exposure.
In our view, the extended rally among lower-rated, higher-yielding bonds may be in its final stages. We base this view, in part, on the fact that the difference in yield between Aaa-rated bonds and Baa-rated bonds — the highest and lowest investment-grade ratings, respectively —is at its narrowest point since late 1999. In other words, the higher-income advantage available to those willing to assume additional credit risk has diminished substantially.
Among sectors, we are maintaining the fund’s exposure to the single-family housing sector, and will look to add to these holdings as opportunities arise.
The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management. They are not meant as investment advice.
Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses. Tax-free funds may not be suitable for IRAs and other non-taxable accounts. Please consult your tax advisor for more information. Shares of this fund are not insured, and their prices will fluctuate with market conditions.
11
Your fund’s performance
This section shows your fund’s performance for periods ended January 31, 2007, the end of the first half of its current fiscal year. In accordance with regulatory requirements for mutual funds, we also include performance as of the most recent calendar quarter-end. Performance should always be considered in light of a fund’s investment strategy. Data represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. For the most recent month-end performance, please visit www.putnam.com or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund performance
Total return for periods ended 1/31/07
| Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class M | |
(inception dates) | (9/20/93) | | (9/9/85) | | (7/26/99) | | (6/1/95) | |
|
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP |
|
Annual average | | | | | | | | |
(life of fund) | 6.62% | 6.43% | 6.32% | 6.32% | 6.03% | 6.03% | 6.39% | 6.23% |
|
10 years | 60.57 | 54.60 | 54.17 | 54.17 | 48.19 | 48.19 | 56.18 | 51.13 |
Annual average | 4.85 | 4.45 | 4.42 | 4.42 | 4.01 | 4.01 | 4.56 | 4.22 |
|
5 years | 24.00 | 19.34 | 20.04 | 18.10 | 19.07 | 19.07 | 22.13 | 18.10 |
Annual average | 4.40 | 3.60 | 3.72 | 3.38 | 3.55 | 3.55 | 4.08 | 3.38 |
|
3 years | 9.76 | 5.64 | 7.56 | 4.66 | 7.20 | 7.20 | 8.72 | 5.22 |
Annual average | 3.15 | 1.85 | 2.46 | 1.53 | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.83 | 1.71 |
|
1 year | 3.20 | -0.60 | 2.62 | -2.34 | 2.59 | 1.60 | 3.00 | -0.46 |
|
6 months | 2.54 | -1.26 | 2.24 | -2.76 | 2.21 | 1.21 | 2.46 | -0.98 |
|
Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Returns at public offering price (POP) for class A and M shares reflect a maximum sales charge of 3.75% and 3.25%, respectively. Class B share returns reflect the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), which is 5% in the first year, declining to 1% in the sixth year, and is eliminated thereafter. Class C shares reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year and is eliminated thereafter. Performance for class A, C, and M shares before their inception is derived from the historical performance of class B shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC) and, for class C shares, the higher operating expenses for such shares. For a portion of the period, this fund limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower.
A 1% short-term trading fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase.
12
Comparative index returns
For periods ended 1/31/07
| | | | Lipper Insured |
| | | Lehman Municipal | | | Municipal Debt Funds |
| | | Bond Index | | | category average* |
|
Annual average | | |
(life of fund) | 7.51% | 6.82% |
|
10 years | 74.22 | 59.06 |
Annual average | 5.71 | 4.74 |
|
5 years | 28.32 | 23.15 |
Annual average | 5.11 | 4.24 |
|
3 years | 12.45 | 9.45 |
Annual average | 3.99 | 3.05 |
|
1 year | 4.29 | 3.48 |
|
6 months | 3.06 | 2.68 |
|
Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.
* Over the 6-month and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods ended 1/31/07, there were 61, 60, 59, 59, and 50 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.
13
Fund price and distribution information
For the six-month period ended 1/31/07
Distributions* | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M |
|
Number | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
|
Income1 | $0.284353 | $0.236245 | $0.225337 | $0.263054 |
|
Capital gains2 | | | | | | |
|
Long-term | 0.042200 | 0.042200 | 0.042200 | 0.042200 |
|
Short-term | — | — | — | — |
|
Total | $0.326553 | $0.278445 | $0.267537 | $0.305254 |
|
Share value: | NAV | POP | NAV | NAV | NAV | POP |
|
7/31/06 | $14.70 | $15.27 | $14.72 | $14.73 | $14.74 | $15.24 |
|
1/31/07 | 14.75 | 15.32 | 14.77 | 14.78 | 14.79 | 15.29 |
|
Current yield (end of period) | | | | | | |
|
Current dividend rate3 | 3.85% | 3.71% | 3.20% | 3.06% | 3.56% | 3.44% |
|
Taxable equivalent4 | 5.92 | 5.71 | 4.92 | 4.71 | 5.48 | 5.29 |
|
Current 30-day SEC yield5 | 3.15 | 3.03 | 2.51 | 2.36 | 2.86 | 2.76 |
|
Taxable equivalent4 | 4.85 | 4.66 | 3.86 | 3.63 | 4.40 | 4.25 |
|
* Dividend sources are estimated and may vary based on final tax calculations after the fund’s fiscal year-end.
1 For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes.
2 Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes.
3 Most recent distribution, excluding capital gains, annualized and divided by NAV or POP at end of period.
4 Assumes maximum 35% federal tax rate for 2006. Results for investors subject to lower tax rates would not be as advantageous.
5 Based only on investment income, calculated using SEC guidelines.
Fund performance as of most recent calendar quarter
Total return for periods ended 12/31/06
| Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class M | |
(inception dates) | (9/20/93) | | (9/9/85) | | (7/26/99) | | (6/1/95) | |
|
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP |
|
Annual average | | | | | | | | |
(life of fund) | 6.66% | 6.47% | 6.36% | 6.36% | 6.08% | 6.08% | 6.44% | 6.28% |
|
10 years | 61.31 | 55.35 | 54.94 | 54.94 | 48.94 | 48.94 | 56.92 | 51.86 |
Annual average | 4.90 | 4.50 | 4.48 | 4.48 | 4.06 | 4.06 | 4.61 | 4.27 |
|
5 years | 26.84 | 22.09 | 22.89 | 20.90 | 21.93 | 21.93 | 24.96 | 20.92 |
Annual average | 4.87 | 4.07 | 4.21 | 3.87 | 4.05 | 4.05 | 4.56 | 3.87 |
|
3 years | 10.69 | 6.48 | 8.52 | 5.59 | 8.17 | 8.17 | 9.70 | 6.17 |
Annual average | 3.44 | 2.11 | 2.76 | 1.83 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 3.13 | 2.02 |
|
1 year | 3.83 | 0.02 | 3.24 | -1.75 | 3.20 | 2.20 | 3.62 | 0.12 |
|
6 months | 4.14 | 0.27 | 3.84 | -1.16 | 3.79 | 2.79 | 4.06 | 0.59 |
|
14
Your fund’s expenses
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees, distribution fees (12b-1 fees), and other expenses. In the most recent six-month period, your fund limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You may also pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial advisor.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund from August 1, 2006, to January 31, 2007. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000* | $ 4.34 | $ 7.60 | $ 8.36 | $ 5.82 |
|
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,025.40 | $1,022.40 | $1,022.10 | $1,024.60 |
|
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 1/31/07. The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Estimate the expenses you paid
To estimate the ongoing expenses you paid for the six months ended January 31, 2007, use the calculation method below. To find the value of your investment on August 1, 2006, go to www.putnam.com and log on to your account. Click on the “Transaction History” tab in your Daily Statement and enter 08/01/2006 in both the “from” and “to” fields. Alternatively, call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.
15
Compare expenses using the SEC’s method
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total costs) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000* | $ 4.33 | $ 7.58 | $ 8.34 | $ 5.80 |
|
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,020.92 | $1,017.69 | $1,016.94 | $1,019.46 |
|
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 1/31/07. The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Compare expenses using industry averages
You can also compare your fund’s expenses with the average of its peer group, as defined by Lipper, an independent fund-rating agency that ranks funds relative to others that Lipper considers to have similar investment styles or objectives. The expense ratio for each share class shown below indicates how much of your fund’s average net assets have been used to pay ongoing expenses during the period.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M |
|
Your fund’s annualized | | | | |
expense ratio | 0.85% | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.14% |
|
Average annualized expense | | | | |
ratio for Lipper peer group* | 0.88% | 1.52% | 1.67% | 1.17% |
|
* Simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds in the fund’s Lipper peer group, calculated in accordance with Lipper’s standard method for comparing fund expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses). This average reflects each fund’s expenses for its most recent fiscal year available to Lipper as of 12/31/06. To facilitate comparison, Putnam has adjusted this average to reflect the 12b-1 fees carried by each class of shares. The peer group may include funds that are significantly smaller or larger than the fund, which may limit the comparability of the fund’s expenses to the simple average, which typically is higher than the asset-weighted average.
16
Your fund’s
portfolio turnover
Putnam funds are actively managed by teams of experts who buy and sell securities based on intensive analysis of companies, industries, economies, and markets. Portfolio turnover is a measure of how often a fund’s managers buy and sell securities for your fund. A portfolio turnover of 100%, for example, means that the managers sold and replaced securities valued at 100% of a fund’s assets within a one-year period. Funds with high turnover may be more likely to generate capital gains and dividends that must be distributed to shareholders as taxable income. High turnover may also cause a fund to pay more brokerage commissions and other transaction costs, which may detract from performance.
Funds that invest in bonds or other fixed-income instruments may have higher turnover than funds that invest only in stocks. Short-term bond funds tend to have higher turnover than longer-term bond funds, because shorter-term bonds will mature or be sold more frequently than longer-term bonds. You can use the table below to compare your fund’s turnover with the average turnover for funds in its Lipper category.
Turnover comparisons
Percentage of holdings that change every year
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
|
Putnam AMT-Free Insured | | | | | |
Municipal Fund | 7% | 13% | 27% | 43% | 55% |
|
Lipper Insured Municipal Debt | | | | | |
Funds category average | 37% | 39% | 45% | 62% | 46% |
|
Turnover data for the fund is calculated based on the fund’s fiscal-year period, which ends on July 31. Turnover data for the fund’s Lipper category is calculated based on the average of the turnover of each fund in the category for its fiscal year ended during the indicated year. Fiscal years vary across funds in the Lipper category, which may limit the comparability of the fund’s portfolio turnover rate to the Lipper average. Comparative data for 2006 is based on information available as of 12/31/06.
17
Your fund’s risk
This risk comparison is designed to help you understand how your fund compares with other funds. The comparison utilizes a risk measure developed by Morningstar, an independent fund-rating agency. This risk measure is referred to as the fund’s Morningstar Risk.
Your fund’s Morningstar® Risk
Your fund’s Morningstar Risk is shown alongside that of the average fund in its Morningstar category. The risk bar broadens the comparison by translating the fund’s Morningstar Risk into a percentile, which is based on the fund’s ranking among all funds rated by Morningstar as of December 31, 2006. A higher Morningstar Risk generally indicates that a fund’s monthly returns have varied more widely.
Morningstar determines a fund’s Morningstar Risk by assessing variations in the fund’s monthly returns — with an emphasis on downside variations — over a 3-year period, if available. Those measures are weighted and averaged to produce the fund’s Morningstar Risk. The information shown is provided for the fund’s class A shares only; information for other classes may vary. Morningstar Risk is based on historical data and does not indicate future results. Morningstar does not purport to measure the risk associated with a current investment in a fund, either on an absolute basis or on a relative basis. Low Morningstar Risk does not mean that you cannot lose money on an investment in a fund. Copyright 2007 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete, or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.
18
Your fund’s management
Your fund is managed by the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt Fixed-Income Team. Thalia Meehan is the Portfolio Leader, and Paul Drury, Brad Libby, and Susan McCormack are Portfolio Members of your fund. The Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members coordinate the team’s management of the fund.
For a complete listing of the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt Fixed-Income Team, including those who are not Portfolio Leaders or Portfolio Members of your fund, visit Putnam’s Individual Investor Web site at www.putnam.com.
Investment team fund ownership
The table below shows how much the fund’s current Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members have invested in the fund and in all Putnam mutual funds (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of January 31, 2007, and January 31, 2006.
N/A indicates the individual was not a Portfolio Leader or Portfolio Member as of 1/31/06.
Trustee and Putnam employee fund ownership
As of January 31, 2007, all of the Trustees of the Putnam funds owned fund shares. The table below shows the approximate value of investments in the fund and all Putnam funds as of that date by the Trustees and Putnam employees. These amounts include investments by the Trustees’ and employees’ immediate family members and investments through retirement and deferred compensation plans.
| | Total assets in |
| Assets in the fund | all Putnam funds |
|
Trustees | $49,000 | $101,000,000 |
|
Putnam employees | $12,000 | $454,000,000 |
|
19
Fund manager compensation
The total 2006 fund manager compensation that is attributable to your fund is approximately $90,000. This amount includes a portion of 2006 compensation paid by Putnam Management to the fund managers listed in this section for their portfolio management responsibilities, calculated based on the fund assets they manage taken as a percentage of the total assets they manage. The compensation amount also includes a portion of the 2006 compensation paid to the Chief Investment Officer of the team and the Group Chief Investment Officer of the fund’s broader investment category for their oversight responsibilities, calculated based on the fund assets they oversee taken as a percentage of the total assets they oversee. This amount does not include compensation of other personnel involved in research, trading, administration, systems, compliance, or fund operations; nor does it include non-compensation costs. These percentages are determined as of the fund’s fiscal period-end. For personnel who joined Putnam Management during or after 2006, the calculation reflects annualized 2006 compensation or an estimate of 2007 compensation, as applicable.
Other Putnam funds managed by the Portfolio Leader and
Portfolio Members
Thalia Meehan is the Portfolio Leader, and Paul Drury, Brad Libby, and Susan McCormack are Portfolio Members, of Putnam’s open-end tax-exempt funds for the following states: Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The same group also manages Putnam California Investment Grade Municipal Trust, Putnam Investment Grade Municipal Trust, Putnam Municipal Bond Fund, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, Putnam New York Investment Grade Municipal Trust, and Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund.
Paul Drury is the Portfolio Leader, and Brad Libby, Susan McCormack, and Thalia Meehan are Portfolio Members, of Putnam High Yield Municipal Trust, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Putnam Tax-Free Health Care Fund, and Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund.
Thalia Meehan, Paul Drury, Brad Libby, and Susan McCormack may also manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by Putnam Management or an affiliate.
Changes in your fund’s Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members
During the year ended January 31, 2007, Brad Libby became a Portfolio Member, and Thalia Meehan became a Portfolio Member and then Portfolio Leader, of your fund. These changes followed the departure of Portfolio Leaders David Hamlin and James St. John from your fund’s management team.
20
Putnam fund ownership by Putnam’s Executive Board
The table below shows how much the members of Putnam’s Executive Board have invested in all Putnam mutual funds (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of January 31, 2007, and January 31, 2006.
| | $1 – | $10,001 – | $50,001 – | $100,001 – | $500,001 – | $1,000,001 |
| Year | $0 | $10,000 | $50,000 | $100,000 | $500,000 | $1,000,000 | and over |
|
Philippe Bibi | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Chief Technology Officer | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Joshua Brooks | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Deputy Head of Investments | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
William Connolly | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Head of Retail Management | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Kevin Cronin | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Head of Investments | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Charles Haldeman, Jr. | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
President and CEO | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Amrit Kanwal | 2007 | | | | | • | |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer | 2006 | | | | | • | |
|
Steven Krichmar | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Chief of Operations | 2006 | | | | | • | |
|
Francis McNamara, III | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
General Counsel | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Jeffrey Peters | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Head of International Business | N/A | | | | | | |
|
Richard Robie, III | 2007 | | | | | • | |
|
|
Chief Administrative Officer | 2006 | | | | | • | |
|
Edward Shadek | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Deputy Head of Investments | 2006 | | | | | | | • |
|
Sandra Whiston | 2007 | | | | | | • | |
|
|
Head of Institutional Management | 2006 | | | | | | • | |
|
N/A indicates the individual was not a member of Putnam’s Executive Board as of 1/31/06.
21
Terms and definitions
Important terms
Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.
Net asset value (NAV) is the price, or value, of one share of a mutual fund, without a sales charge. NAVs fluctuate with market conditions. NAV is calculated by dividing the net assets of each class of shares by the number of outstanding shares in the class.
Public offering price (POP) is the price of a mutual fund share plus the maximum sales charge levied at the time of purchase. POP performance figures shown here assume the 3.75% maximum sales charge for class A shares and 3.25% for class M shares.
Contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) is generally a charge applied at the time of the redemption of class B or C shares and assumes redemption at the end of the period. Your fund’s class B CDSC declines from a 5% maximum during the first year to 1% during the sixth year. After the sixth year, the CDSC no longer applies. The CDSC for class C shares is 1% for one year after purchase.
Share classes
Class A shares are generally subject to an initial sales charge and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).
Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.
Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.
Class M shares have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC.
22
Comparative indexes
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.
Lehman Global Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of global investment-grade fixed-income securities.
Lehman GNMA Index is an unmanaged index of Government National Mortgage Association bonds.
Lehman Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of long-term fixed-rate investment-grade tax-exempt bonds.
Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) EAFE Index is an unmanaged index of equity securities from developed countries in Western Europe, the Far East, and Australasia.
Russell 2000 Index is an unmanaged index of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index.
S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.
Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Lipper is a third-party industry-ranking entity that ranks mutual funds. Its rankings do not reflect sales charges. Lipper rankings are based on total return at net asset value relative to other funds that have similar current investment styles or objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper may change a fund’s category assignment at its discretion. Lipper category averages reflect performance trends for funds within a category.
23
Trustee approval of
management contract
General conclusions
The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to approve the continuance of your fund’s management contract with Putnam Management. In this regard, the Board of Trustees, with the assistance of its Contract Committee consisting solely of Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Putnam funds (the “Independent Trustees”), requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary under the circumstances. Over the course of several months ending in June 2006, the Contract Committee met four times to consider the information provided by Putnam Management and other information developed with the assistance of the Board’s independent counsel and independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key aspects of this informat ion with all of the Independent Trustees. Upon completion of this review, the Contract Committee recommended, and the Independent Trustees approved, the continuance of your fund’s management contract, effective July 1, 2006.
This approval was based on the following conclusions:
• That the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing such services, and
• That such fee schedule represented an appropriate sharing between fund shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.
These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and were not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered these factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for your fund and the other Putnam funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements in prior years.
24
Management fee schedules and categories; total expenses
The Trustees reviewed the management fee schedules in effect for all Putnam funds, including fee levels and breakpoints, and the assignment of funds to particular fee categories. In reviewing fees and expenses, the Trustees generally focused their attention on material changes in circumstances — for example, changes in a fund’s size or investment style, changes in Putnam Management’s operating costs, or changes in competitive practices in the mutual fund industry — that suggest that consideration of fee changes might be warranted. The Trustees concluded that the circumstances did not warrant changes to the management fee structure of your fund, which had been carefully developed over the years, re-examined on many occasions and adjusted where appropriate. The Trustees focused on two areas of particular interest, as discussed further below:
• Competitiveness. The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds, which indicated that, in a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc., your fund ranked in the 46th percentile in management fees and in the 31st percentile in total expenses (less any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2005 (the first percentile being the least expensive funds and the 100th percentile being the most expensive funds). (Because the fund’s custom peer group is smaller than the fund’s broad Lipper Inc. peer group, this expense information may differ from the Lipper peer expense information found elsewhere in this report.) The Trustees noted that expense ratios for a number of Putnam funds, which show the percentage of fund assets used to pay for managem ent and administrative services, distribution (12b-1) fees and other expenses, had been increasing recently as a result of declining net assets and the natural operation of fee breakpoints.
The Trustees noted that the expense ratio increases described above were currently being controlled by expense limitations implemented in January 2004 and which Putnam Management, in consultation with the Contract Committee, has committed to maintain at least through 2007. These expense limitations give effect to a commitment by Putnam Management that the expense ratio of each open-end fund would be no higher than the average expense ratio of the competitive funds included in the fund’s relevant Lipper universe (exclusive of any applicable 12b-1 charges in each case). The Trustees observed that this commitment to limit fund expenses has served shareholders well since its inception. In order to ensure that the expenses of the Putnam funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards, the Trustees requested, and Putnam Management agreed, to implement an additional expense limitation for certain funds for the twelve months beginning January 1, 2007 equal to the average expense ratio (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) of a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper based on the size of the fund. This additional expense limitation will be applied to those open-end funds that had above-average expense ratios (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) based on the Lipper custom peer group data for the period ended December 31, 2005. This additional expense limitation will not be applied to your fund.
25
• Economies of scale. Your fund currently has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale, which means that the effective management fee rate of a fund (as a percentage of fund assets) declines as a fund grows in size and crosses specified asset thresholds. Conversely, as a fund shrinks in size — as has been the case for many Putnam funds in recent years — these breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. In recent years, the Trustees have examined the operation of the existing breakpoint structure during periods of both growth and decline in asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee schedules in effect for the funds represented an appropriate sharing of economies of scale at current asset levels. In reaching this conclu sion, the Trustees considered the Contract Committee’s stated intent to continue to work with Putnam Management to plan for an eventual resumption in the growth of assets, including a study of potential economies that might be produced under various growth assumptions.
In connection with their review of the management fees and total expenses of the Putnam funds, the Trustees also reviewed the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by Putnam Management and its affiliates from the relationship with the funds. This information included trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability with respect to the funds’ management contracts, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis. Because many of the costs incurred by Putnam Management in managing the funds are not readily identifiable to particular funds, the Trustees observed that the methodology for allocating costs is an important factor in evaluating Putnam Management’s costs and profitabil ity, both as to the Putnam funds in the aggregate and as to individual funds. The Trustees reviewed Putnam Management’s cost allocation methodology with the assistance of independent consultants and concluded that this methodology was reasonable and well-considered.
Investment performance
The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management represented a major factor in the Trustees’ evaluation of the quality of services provided by Putnam Management under your fund’s management contract. The Trustees were assisted in their review of the Putnam funds’ investment process and performance by the work of the Investment Process Committee of the Trustees and the Investment Oversight Committees of the Trustees, which meet on a regular monthly basis with the funds’ portfolio teams throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment process — as measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognize that this does not gu arantee favorable investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods
26
and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds.
The Trustees noted the satisfactory investment performance of many Putnam funds. They also noted the disappointing investment performance of certain funds in recent years and discussed with senior management of Putnam Management the factors contributing to such underperformance and actions being taken to improve performance. The Trustees recognized that, in recent years, Putnam Management has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes and in the fund product line to address areas of underperformance. In particular, they noted the important contributions of Putnam Management’s leadership in attracting, retaining and supporting high-quality investment professionals and in systematically implementing an investment process that seeks to merge the best features of fundamental and quantitative analysis. The Trustees indicated their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the effectiveness of t hese changes and to evaluate whether additional changes to address areas of underperformance are warranted.
In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that your fund’s class A share cumulative total return performance at net asset value was in the following percentiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds) (compared using tax-adjusted performance to recognize the different federal income tax treatment for capital gains distributions and exempt-interest distributions) for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2006 (the first percentile being the best performing funds and the 100th percentile being the worst performing funds):
One-year period | Three-year period | Five-year period |
|
46th | 45th | 43rd |
(Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods shown elsewhere in this report. Over the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2006, there were 49, 45, and 45 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group.* Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.)
As a general matter, the Trustees concluded that cooperative efforts between the Trustees and Putnam Management represent the most effective way to address investment performance problems. The Trustees noted that investors in the Putnam funds have, in effect, placed their trust in the Putnam organization, under the oversight of the funds’ Trustees, to make appropriate decisions regarding the management of the funds. Based on the responsiveness of Putnam Management in the recent past to Trustee concerns about investment performance, the Trustees concluded that it is preferable to seek change within Putnam Management to
* The percentile rankings for your fund’s class A share annualized total return performance in the Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds category for the one-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2006, were 57%, 37%, and 42%, respectively. Over the one-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2006, the fund ranked 33 out of 57, 21 out of 56, and 20 out of 47 funds, respectively. Unlike the information above, these rankings reflect performance before taxes. Note that this more recent information was not available when the Trustees approved the continuance of your fund’s management contract.
27
address performance shortcomings. In the Trustees’ view, the alternative of terminating a management contract and engaging a new investment adviser for an underperforming fund would entail significant disruptions and would not provide any greater assurance of improved investment performance.
Brokerage and soft-dollar allocations; other benefits
The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under the management contract with your fund. These include benefits related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research services that may be useful to Putnam Management in managing the assets of the fund and of other clients. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with the allocation of fund brokerage to ensure that the principle of seeking “best price and execution” remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
The Trustees’ annual review of your fund’s management contract also included the review of its distributor’s contract and distribution plan with Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership and the custodian agreement and investor servicing agreement with Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company, all of which provide benefits to affiliates of Putnam Management.
Comparison of retail and institutional fee schedules
The information examined by the Trustees as part of their annual contract review has included for many years information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit pension plans, college endowments, etc. This information included comparison of such fees with fees charged to the funds, as well as a detailed assessment of the differences in the services provided to these two types of clients. The Trustees observed, in this regard, that the differences in fee rates between institutional clients and the funds are by no means uniform when examined by individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of investment management services to these types of clients reflect to a substantial degree historical competitive forces operating in separate market places. The Trustees considered the fact that fee rates across all asset sectors are higher on average for fun ds than for institutional clients, as well as the differences between the services that Putnam Management provides to the Putnam funds and those that it provides to institutional clients of the firm, but did not rely on such comparisons to any significant extent in concluding that the management fees paid by your fund are reasonable.
28
Other information
for shareholders
Important notice regarding delivery of shareholder documents
In accordance with SEC regulations, Putnam sends a single copy of annual and semiannual shareholder reports, prospectuses, and proxy statements to Putnam shareholders who share the same address, unless a shareholder requests otherwise. If you prefer to receive your own copy of these documents, please call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581, and Putnam will begin sending individual copies within 30 days.
Proxy voting
Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests of our shareholders. The Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, are available on the Putnam Individual Investor Web site, www.putnam.com/individual, and on the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC’s Web site, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by calling Putnam’s Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund portfolio holdings
The fund will file a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC’s Web site or the operation of the Public Reference Room.
29
Financial statements
A guide to financial statements
These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes, constitute the fund’s financial statements.
The fund’s portfolio lists all the fund’s investments and their values as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of concentration and diversification.
Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and noninvestment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets includes the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)
Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings — from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal period.
Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund’s net assets were affected by the fund’s net investment gain or loss, by distributions to shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund’s shares. It lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the one in which they were earned. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. Actual results may vary. Any non-taxable return of capital cannot be determined until final tax calculations are completed after the end of the fund’s fiscal year.
Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund’s investment results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting the five most recent reporting periods. In a semiannual report, the highlight table also includes the current reporting period.
30
The fund’s portfolio 1/31/07 (Unaudited)
Key to abbreviations | |
|
AMBAC AMBAC Indemnity Corporation | FSA Financial Security Assurance |
CIFG CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. | GNMA Coll. Government National Mortgage |
COP Certificate of Participation | Association Collateralized |
FGIC Financial Guaranty Insurance Company | G.O. Bonds General Obligation Bonds |
FHA Insd. Federal Housing Administration Insured | MBIA MBIA Insurance Company |
FHLMC Coll. Federal Home Loan Mortgage | PSFG Permanent School Fund Guaranteed |
Corporation Collateralized | U.S. Govt. Coll. U.S. Government Collateralized |
FNMA Coll. Federal National Mortgage Association | VRDN Variable Rate Demand Notes |
Collateralized | XLCA XL Capital Assurance |
FRN Floating Rate Notes | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (99.1%)* | | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Alabama (1.1%) | | | | | |
AL Hsg. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Single | | | | | |
Fam. Mtge.) | | | | | |
Ser. A-1, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
6.05s, 4/1/17 | Aaa | $ | 445,000 | $ | 455,782 |
Ser. G, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., FHLMC | | | | | |
Coll., 5 1/2s, 10/1/37 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,162,840 |
| | | | | 3,618,622 |
|
|
Alaska (1.0%) | | | | | |
AK State Hsg. Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, 4.4s, 12/1/31 | Aaa | | 3,155,000 | | 3,179,073 |
|
|
Arkansas (1.0%) | | | | | |
Fayetteville, Sales & Use Tax Cap. Impt. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, FSA, 4s, 11/1/21 | AAA | | 800,000 | | 794,672 |
Springdale, Sales & Use Tax Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
FSA, 4.2s, 7/1/24 | AAA | | 2,500,000 | | 2,493,850 |
| | | | | 3,288,522 |
|
|
California (12.6%) | | | | | |
CA State Dept. of Wtr. Resources Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, 5 1/2s, 5/1/13 | Aaa | | 10,000,000 | | 10,927,000 |
CA State Pub. Wks. Board Rev. Bonds (Dept. | | | | | |
Hlth. Svcs. Richmond Laboratory), Ser. B, | | | | | |
XLCA, 5s, 11/1/23 | Aaa | | 2,445,000 | | 2,583,020 |
Garvey, School Dist. G.O. Bonds (Election | | | | | |
of 2004), FSA | | | | | |
zero %, 8/1/26 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 412,160 |
zero %, 8/1/25 | Aaa | | 1,475,000 | | 638,528 |
31
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (99.1%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
California continued | | | | | |
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Tobacco Settlement), Ser. B, | | | | | |
AMBAC, FHLMC Coll., FNMA Coll., 5s, | | | | | |
6/1/38 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | $ | 2,475,000 | $ | 2,633,252 |
Grossmont-Cuyamaca, Cmnty. College Dist. | | | | | |
G.O. Bonds (Election of 2002), Ser. B, | | | | | |
FGIC, zero %, 8/1/17 | Aaa | | 2,100,000 | | 1,348,200 |
Los Angeles, Unified School Dist. | | | | | |
G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(Election of 2004), Ser. C, FGIC, | | | | | |
5s, 7/1/26 | Aaa | | 2,745,000 | | 2,886,999 |
Ser. A-1, FSA, 4 1/2s, 7/1/23 | Aaa | | 1,500,000 | | 1,514,865 |
Sacramento, Muni. Util. Dist. Fin. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Consumnes), MBIA, 5s, 7/1/18 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 4,333,680 |
San Diego Cnty., Wtr. Auth. COP, FGIC, | | | | | |
5.681s, 4/23/08 | Aaa | | 7,000,000 | | 7,175,700 |
San Diego, Unified School Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(Election of 1998), Ser. E, FSA, 5 1/4s, | | | | | |
7/1/19 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 2,000,000 | | 2,175,580 |
Santa Ana, Fin. Auth. Lease Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Police Admin. & Hldg. Fac.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
MBIA, 6 1/4s, 7/1/17 | Aaa | | 3,680,000 | | 4,385,898 |
| | | | | 41,014,882 |
|
|
Colorado (—%) | | | | | |
CO Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Cmnty. | | | | | |
Provider Pooled Loan Program), Ser. A, | | | | | |
FSA, 7 1/4s, 7/15/17 | Aaa | | 62,000 | | 62,130 |
|
|
Florida (8.9%) | | | | | |
Hernando Cnty., Rev. Bonds (Criminal | | | | | |
Justice Complex Fin.), FGIC, | | | | | |
7.65s, 7/1/16 | Aaa | | 13,675,000 | | 17,604,648 |
Orlando & Orange Cnty., Expressway Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, FGIC, 8 1/4s, 7/1/14 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 6,379,650 |
Sumter Cnty., School Dist. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Multi-Dist. Loan Program), FSA, | | | | | |
7.15s, 11/1/15 | Aaa | | 3,935,000 | | 4,870,782 |
| | | | | 28,855,080 |
|
|
Georgia (1.3%) | | | | | |
Fulton Cnty., Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Klaus | | | | | |
Pkg. & Fam. Hsg. Project), MBIA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 11/1/20 | Aaa | | 3,360,000 | | 3,632,530 |
GA Muni. Elec. Pwr. Auth. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. Y, AMBAC, U.S. Govt. Coll., 6.4s, | | | | | |
1/1/13 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 415,000 | | 457,326 |
| | | | | 4,089,856 |
32
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (99.1%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Illinois (7.6%) | | | | | |
Chicago, G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, | | | | | |
5 5/8s, 1/1/39 | Aaa | $ | 155,000 | $ | 166,351 |
Chicago, Board of Ed. G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
MBIA, 5 1/4s, 12/1/19 | Aaa | | 1,500,000 | | 1,597,245 |
Cicero, G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, XLCA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 1/1/21 | AAA | | 2,250,000 | | 2,418,413 |
Cook Cnty., G.O. Bonds, Ser. D, AMBAC, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 11/15/21 | Aaa | | 4,385,000 | | 4,669,674 |
Du Page Cnty., Cmnty. High School Dist. | | | | | |
G.O. Bonds (Dist. No. 108 — Lake Park), | | | | | |
FSA, 5.6s, 1/1/20 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,091,060 |
IL G.O. Bonds, Ser. 1, MBIA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 10/1/19 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,334,150 |
IL State Toll Hwy. Auth. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A-1, FSA, 5s, 1/1/22 | Aaa | | 2,500,000 | | 2,668,000 |
Regl. Trans. Auth. Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
AMBAC, 8s, 6/1/17 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 6,537,250 |
| | | | | 24,482,143 |
|
|
Indiana (5.8%) | | | | | |
Anderson, Indpt. School Bldg. Corp. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds (First Mtg.), FSA, 5 1/2s, | | | | | |
1/15/28 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 1,655,000 | | 1,829,123 |
Center Grove, Bldg. Rev. Bonds, AMBAC, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 1/15/26 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 6,605,000 | | 7,062,859 |
Center Grove, Ind. Bldg. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(First Mtg.), FGIC, 5s, 7/15/25 | AAA | | 1,345,000 | | 1,417,939 |
Evansville Vanderburgh Pub. Leasing Corp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (1st Mtge.), MBIA, 5 3/4s, | | | | | |
7/15/18 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,087,120 |
IN Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Supply Syst. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, 5s, 1/1/20 | Aaa | | 5,695,000 | | 6,078,330 |
IN State Hsg. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Single Family Mtge.), Ser. A-1, GNMA | | | | | |
Coll., FNMA Coll. | | | | | |
4.2s, 7/1/17 | Aaa | | 260,000 | | 261,638 |
4.15s, 7/1/16 | Aaa | | 375,000 | | 376,890 |
4.1s, 7/1/15 | Aaa | | 115,000 | | 115,581 |
3.95s, 7/1/14 | Aaa | | 355,000 | | 356,576 |
3.9s, 1/1/14 | Aaa | | 250,000 | | 250,293 |
| | | | | 18,836,349 |
|
|
Louisiana (2.9%) | | | | | |
Ernest N. Morial-New Orleans Exhibit Hall | | | | | |
Auth. Special Tax, AMBAC, 5s, 7/15/20 | AAA | | 5,730,000 | | 6,078,040 |
LA Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, 5 3/8s, 6/1/19 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,215,130 |
| | | | | 9,293,170 |
33
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (99.1%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Massachusetts (4.3%) | | | | | |
MA State Special Oblig. Dedicated Tax Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, FGIC, FHLMC Coll., FNMA Coll. | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 1/1/24 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,082,260 |
5 1/4s, 1/1/23 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,082,260 |
5 1/4s, 1/1/22 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 11,000,000 | | 11,904,860 |
| | | | | 14,069,380 |
|
|
Michigan (8.8%) | | | | | |
Detroit, City School Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(School Bldg. & Site Impt.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
FGIC, 5s, 5/1/25 | Aaa | | 7,990,000 | | 8,332,691 |
Detroit, Swr. Disp. FRN, Ser. D, FSA, | | | | | |
4.191s, 7/1/32 | Aaa | | 1,125,000 | | 1,126,463 |
Detroit, Swr. Disp. VRDN, Ser. B, FSA, | | | | | |
3.7s, 7/1/33 | VMIG1 | | 2,770,000 | | 2,770,000 |
Detroit, Wtr. Supply Syst. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. B, FGIC, 5 1/4s, 7/1/20 | Aaa | | 720,000 | | 762,257 |
Kent, Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Spectrum Hlth. Care), Ser. A, MBIA, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 1/15/17 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 500,000 | | 537,825 |
MI Muni. Board Auth. Rev. Bonds (Clean | | | | | |
Wtr. Revolving Fund), 5s, 10/1/25 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,066,180 |
MI State Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Mercy Hlth.), Ser. X, MBIA | | | | | |
6s, 8/15/34 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 3,350,000 | | 3,557,298 |
6s, 8/15/34 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 1,650,000 | | 1,752,102 |
MI State Strategic Fund, Ltd. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Detroit Edison Co.), AMBAC | | | | | |
7s, 5/1/21 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 5,170,720 |
4.85s, 9/1/30 | Aaa | | 3,500,000 | | 3,614,240 |
| | | | | 28,689,776 |
|
|
Mississippi (1.2%) | | | | | |
MS Dev. Bk. Special Obligation Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Waste Wtr. & Solid Waste Mgt.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
FSA, U.S. Govt. Coll. | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 2/1/19 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,855,000 | | 2,010,171 |
5 3/8s, 2/1/18 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,755,000 | | 1,901,806 |
| | | | | 3,911,977 |
|
|
Missouri (0.4%) | | | | | |
Jackson Cnty., Special Oblig. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Harry S. Truman Sports Complex), AMBAC, | | | | | |
5s, 12/1/22 | Aaa | | 1,285,000 | | 1,374,449 |
|
|
Nevada (1.8%) | | | | | |
Clark Cnty., Rev. Bonds, Ser. B, FGIC, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 7/1/20 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,500,000 | | 3,705,415 |
Washoe Cnty., G.O. Bonds, FGIC, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 5/1/18 | Aaa | | 2,040,000 | | 2,182,718 |
| | | | | 5,888,133 |
34
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (99.1%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
New Hampshire (0.4%) | | | | | |
NH Muni. Bond Bank Rev. Bonds, Ser. C, | | | | | |
MBIA, 5s, 3/15/25 | Aaa | $ | 1,195,000 | $ | 1,265,983 |
|
|
New Jersey (5.6%) | | | | | |
NJ Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(School Fac. Construction), Ser. F, FGIC, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 6/15/21 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 10,000,000 | | 10,812,100 |
(Motor Vehicle), Ser. A, MBIA, 5s, 7/1/27 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,265,150 |
NJ State Rev. Bonds (Trans. Syst.), | | | | | |
Ser. C, AMBAC, zero %, 12/15/24 | Aaa | | 4,800,000 | | 2,206,128 |
| | | | | 18,283,378 |
|
|
New York (6.9%) | | | | | |
Nassau Cnty., Hlth. Care Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Nassau Hlth. Care Corp.), FSA | | | | | |
6s, 8/1/13 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 4,610,000 | | 4,942,888 |
6s, 8/1/12 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 2,285,000 | | 2,450,000 |
NY City, Hsg. Dev. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, FGIC, 5s, 7/1/25 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,057,580 |
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Queens Baseball Stadium — Pilot), AMBAC, | | | | | |
5s, 1/1/23 | Aaa | | 950,000 | | 1,014,211 |
NY City, Muni. Wtr. & Swr. Fin. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. B, AMBAC, 5s, 6/15/28 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,163,230 |
NY State Dorm. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Brooklyn | | | | | |
Law School), Ser. B, XLCA | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 7/1/22 | Aaa | | 2,270,000 | | 2,464,789 |
5 3/8s, 7/1/20 | Aaa | | 2,215,000 | | 2,403,762 |
NY State Hwy. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Hwy. & | | | | | |
Bridge Trust Fund), Ser. B, FGIC, 5s, 4/1/17 | AAA | | 1,500,000 | | 1,613,295 |
Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, 5s, 10/15/29 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,168,360 |
| | | | | 22,278,115 |
|
|
North Carolina (2.5%) | | | | | |
NC State Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 1, Catawba Elec.), Ser. A, MBIA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 1/1/19 | Aaa | | 7,500,000 | | 8,000,700 |
|
|
Ohio (1.5%) | | | | | |
Cleveland, G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, | | | | | |
5s, 10/1/21 | Aaa | | 2,920,000 | | 3,109,712 |
Morley Library Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(Lake Cnty. Dist. Library), AMBAC, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 12/1/19 | Aaa | | 1,535,000 | | 1,646,042 |
OH Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Single Fam. Mtge. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. 85-A, FGIC, FHA Insd., | | | | | |
zero %, 1/15/15 | Aaa | | 45,000 | | 20,711 |
| | | | | 4,776,465 |
35
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (99.1%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Oklahoma (2.1%) | | | | | |
Grand River Dam Auth. Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
FSA, 5s, 6/1/12 | AAA | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,322,838 |
OK City Arpt. Trust Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
FSA, 5 1/4s, 7/1/21 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,129,810 |
OK State Cap. Impt. Auth. State Facs. VRDN | | | | | |
(Higher Ed.), Ser. D-1, CIFG, 3.74s, 7/1/31 | VMIG1 | | 2,200,000 | | 2,200,000 |
| | | | | 6,652,648 |
|
|
Pennsylvania (2.6%) | | | | | |
Erie Cnty., Convention Ctr. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Convention Ctr. Hotel), FGIC | | | | | |
5s, 1/15/22 | Aaa | | 1,415,000 | | 1,494,679 |
5s, 1/15/21 | Aaa | | 1,305,000 | | 1,383,926 |
PA State Pub. School Bldg. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Philadelphia School Dist.), FSA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 6/1/25 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,242,280 |
Philadelphia, G.O. Bonds, CIFG, 5s, 8/1/23 | Aaa | | 2,000,000 | | 2,124,140 |
| | | | | 8,245,025 |
|
|
South Carolina (1.3%) | | | | | |
SC State Pub. Svcs. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Santee Cooper), Ser. A, MBIA, 5s, 1/1/19 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 4,281,600 |
|
|
South Dakota (0.4%) | | | | | |
SD Hsg. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Home | | | | | |
Ownership Mtge.), Ser. J, 4.6s, 5/1/19 | AAA | | 1,250,000 | | 1,288,950 |
|
|
Texas (7.3%) | | | | | |
Dallas, Indpt. School Dist. G.O. Bonds, | | | | | |
PSFG, 5 1/4s, 2/15/19 | Aaa | | 2,500,000 | | 2,653,875 |
Hays Cnty., G.O. Bonds, FSA, 5s, 8/15/24 | Aaa | | 1,190,000 | | 1,250,095 |
Houston, Arpt. Syst. Rev. Bonds, FSA, | | | | | |
5s, 7/1/21 | Aaa | | 5,280,000 | | 5,489,933 |
Laredo, I S D Pub. Fac. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. C, AMBAC, 5s, 8/1/29 | AAA | | 1,000,000 | | 1,029,940 |
Mission Cons. Indpt. School Dist. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds, PSFG, 5s, 2/15/23 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,060,350 |
Nacogdoches, Indpt. School Dist. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds, PSFG, 5 1/2s, 2/15/15 | Aaa | | 1,320,000 | | 1,399,015 |
San Antonio Wtr. Rev. Bonds, FSA, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 5/15/20 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 4,318,200 |
Victoria G.O. Bonds, FGIC, U.S. Govt. | | | | | |
Coll., 5 1/2s, 8/15/20 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,150,000 | | 3,327,345 |
Waco, Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. Mtge. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Hillcrest Hlth. Care Syst.), | | | | | |
Ser. A, MBIA, FHA Insd., 5s, 8/1/31 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,126,570 |
| | | | | 23,655,323 |
36
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (99.1%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Utah (2.5%) | | | | | |
Intermountain Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, MBIA, 6.15s, 7/1/14 | Aaa | $ | 60,000 | $ | 61,186 |
(Intermountain Pwr. Agcy.), Ser. A, MBIA, | | | | | |
U.S. Govt. Coll., 6.15s, 7/1/14 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 7,900,000 | | 8,128,468 |
| | | | | 8,189,654 |
|
|
Virgin Islands (0.3%) | | | | | |
VI Pub. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds, FGIC, | | | | | |
5s, 10/1/24 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,075,240 |
|
|
Washington (5.4%) | | | | | |
Port of Seattle Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, FGIC, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 10/1/22 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 10,000,000 | | 10,222,500 |
WA State Pub. Pwr. Supply Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Nuclear No. 3), Ser. B, MBIA, 7 1/8s, 7/1/16 | Aaa | | 6,000,000 | | 7,383,295 |
| | | | | 17,605,795 |
|
|
West Virginia (1.6%) | | | | | |
Econ. Dev. Auth. Lease Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Correctional Juvenile Safety), Ser. A, | | | | | |
MBIA, 5s, 6/1/29 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,249,600 |
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS | | | | | |
|
Total investments (cost $305,849,083) | | | | $ | 321,502,018 |
* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $324,371,514.
** The Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s ratings indicated are believed to be the most recent ratings available at January 31, 2007 for the securities listed. Ratings are generally ascribed to securities at the time of issuance. While the agencies may from time to time revise such ratings, they undertake no obligation to do so, and the ratings do not necessarily represent what the agencies would ascribe to these securities at January 31, 2007. Securities ratings are defined in the Statement of Additional Information.
The rates shown on VRDN and Floating Rate Notes (FRN) are the current interest rates at January 31, 2007.
The dates shown on debt obligations are the original maturity dates.
The fund had the following sector concentrations greater than 10% at January 31, 2007 (as a percentage of net assets):
Utilities | 18.4% |
Transportation | 10.2 |
The fund had the following insurance concentrations greater than 10% at January 31, 2007 (as a percentage of net assets):
FGIC | 29.9% |
AMBAC | 22.6 |
MBIA | 21.3 |
FSA | 16.2 |
37
INTEREST RATE SWAP CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING at 1/31/07 (Unaudited) | |
|
| | | Payments | Payments | Unrealized |
Swap counterparty / | | Termination | made by | received by | appreciation/ |
Notional amount | | date | fund per annum | fund per annum | (depreciation) |
|
Citibank, N.A. | | | | | |
$ 7,150,000 | (E) | 5/23/12 | 3 month USD-LIBOR-BBA | 4.923% | $(97,097) |
|
11,000,000 | (E) | 5/23/12 | 3.422% | U.S. Bond Market | |
| | | | Association Municipal Swap | |
| | | | Index | 104,118 |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | | | | |
9,750,000 | (E) | 11/8/11 | 3 month USD-LIBOR-BBA | 5.036% | (85,897) |
|
15,000,000 | (E) | 11/8/11 | 3.488% | U.S. Bond Market | |
| | | | Association Municipal Swap | |
| | | | Index | 70,122 |
|
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. | | | |
14,000,000 | (E) | 11/16/11 | 3.4695% | U.S. Bond Market | |
| | | | Association Municipal Swap | |
| | | | Index | 77,910 |
|
Total | | | | | $ 69,156 |
(E) See Note 1 to the financial statements regarding extended effective dates.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
38
Statement of assets and liabilities 1/31/07 (Unaudited)
ASSETS | |
|
Investment in securities, at value (Note 1): | |
Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $305,849,083) | $321,502,018 |
|
Cash | 749,330 |
|
Interest and other receivables | 2,991,338 |
|
Receivable for shares of the fund sold | 218,644 |
|
Unrealized appreciation on swap contracts (Note 1) | 252,150 |
|
Total assets | 325,713,480 |
|
|
LIABILITIES | |
|
Distributions payable to shareholders | 292,533 |
|
Payable for shares of the fund repurchased | 339,450 |
|
Payable for compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 275,585 |
|
Payable for investor servicing and custodian fees (Note 2) | 12,643 |
|
Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 84,360 |
|
Payable for administrative services (Note 2) | 2,435 |
|
Payable for distribution fees (Note 2) | 89,106 |
|
Other accrued expenses | 62,860 |
|
Unrealized depreciation on swap contracts (Note 1) | 182,994 |
|
Total liabilities | 1,341,966 |
|
Net assets | $324,371,514 |
|
|
REPRESENTED BY | |
|
Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized) (Notes 1 and 4) | $310,106,399 |
|
Undistributed net investment income (Note 1) | 451,348 |
|
Accumulated net realized loss on investments (Note 1) | (1,908,324) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | 15,722,091 |
|
Total — Representing net assets applicable to capital shares outstanding | $324,371,514 |
(Continued on next page)
39
Statement of assets and liabilities (Continued)
COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE | |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per class A share | |
($269,283,073 divided by 18,255,894 shares) | $14.75 |
|
Offering price per class A share | |
(100/96.25 of $14.75)* | $15.32 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class B share | |
($45,567,007 divided by 3,084,979 shares)** | $14.77 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class C share | |
($8,458,477 divided by 572,426 shares)** | $14.78 |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per class M share | |
($1,062,957 divided by 71,863 shares) | $14.79 |
|
Offering price per class M share | |
(100/96.75 of $14.79)*** | $15.29 |
* On single retail sales of less than $100,000. On sales of $100,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
** Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.
*** On single retail sales of less than $50,000. On sales of $50,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
40
Statement of operations Six months ended 1/31/07 (Unaudited)
INTEREST INCOME | $7,741,326 |
|
|
EXPENSES | |
|
Compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 842,340 |
|
Investor servicing fees (Note 2) | 82,996 |
|
Custodian fees (Note 2) | 56,098 |
|
Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 15,662 |
|
Administrative services (Note 2) | 7,338 |
|
Distribution fees — Class A (Note 2) | 283,797 |
|
Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2) | 226,105 |
|
Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2) | 43,527 |
|
Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2) | 2,804 |
|
Other | 67,346 |
|
Non-recurring costs (Notes 2 and 5) | 58 |
|
Costs assumed by Manager (Notes 2 and 5) | (58) |
|
Fees waived and reimbursed by Manager (Note 2) | (3,381) |
|
Total expenses | 1,624,632 |
|
Expense reduction (Note 2) | (79,172) |
|
Net expenses | 1,545,460 |
|
Net investment income | 6,195,866 |
|
Net realized gain on investments (Notes 1 and 3) | 161,245 |
|
Net realized loss on futures contracts (Note 1) | (128,902) |
|
Net realized loss on swap contracts (Note 1) | (71,539) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | |
and swap contracts during the period | 2,248,587 |
|
Net gain on investments | 2,209,391 |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $8,405,257 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
41
Statement of changes in net assets
DECREASE IN NET ASSETS | | |
|
| Six months ended | Year ended |
| 1/31/07* | 7/31/06 |
|
Operations: | | |
Net investment income | $ 6,195,866 | $ 13,098,648 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (39,196) | 1,807,824 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 2,248,587 | (8,966,996) |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 8,405,257 | 5,939,476 |
|
Distributions to shareholders: (Note 1) | | |
|
From ordinary income | | |
|
Tax-exempt net investment income | | |
|
Class A | (5,194,634) | (10,304,074) |
|
Class B | (839,990) | (2,306,405) |
|
Class C | (130,548) | (258,890) |
|
Class M | (19,607) | (39,718) |
|
Net realized short-term gain on investments | | |
|
Class A | — | (515,639) |
|
Class B | — | (146,158) |
|
Class C | — | (16,298) |
|
Class M | — | (2,209) |
|
From net realized long-term gain on investments | | |
|
Class A | (766,496) | (998,896) |
|
Class B | (140,345) | (283,092) |
|
Class C | (23,944) | (31,569) |
|
Class M | (3,188) | (4,282) |
|
Redemption fees (Note 1) | — | 184 |
|
Decrease from capital share transactions (Note 4) | (16,619,900) | (27,565,191) |
|
Total decrease in net assets | (15,333,395) | (36,532,761) |
|
|
NET ASSETS | | |
|
Beginning of period | 339,704,909 | 376,237,670 |
|
End of period (including undistributed net investment | | |
income of $451,348 and $440,261, respectively) | $324,371,514 | $339,704,909 |
* Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
42
This page left blank intentionally.
43
Financial highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | LESS DISTRIBUTIONS: | | | | | RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |
|
| | | Net | | | | | | | Total | | | Ratio of net | |
| Net asset | | realized and | Total | From | From | | | Net asset | return | Net | Ratio of | investment | |
| value, | Net | unrealized | from | net | net realized | | | value, | at net | assets, | expenses to | income (loss) | Portfolio |
| beginning | investment | gain (loss) on | investment | investment | gain on | Total | Redemption | end | asset | end of period | average net | to average | turnover |
Period ended | of period | income (loss) | investments | operations | income | investments | distributions | fees | of period | value (%)(a) | (in thousands) | assets (%)(b) | net assets (%) | (%) |
|
CLASS A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2007** | $14.70 | .28(c) | .09 | .37 | (.28) | (.04) | (.32) | — | $14.75 | 2.54* | $269,283 | .43(c)* | 1.91(c)* | 8.36* |
July 31, 2006 | 15.07 | .57(c) | (.30) | .27 | (.56) | (.08) | (.64) | —(d) | 14.70 | 1.85 | 270,331 | .85(c) | 3.81(c) | 6.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 14.92 | .54(c) | .26 | .80 | (.54) | (.11) | (.65) | —(d) | 15.07 | 5.39 | 277,931 | .84(c) | 3.57(c) | 12.61 |
July 31, 2004 | 14.93 | .53 | .25 | .78 | (.53) | (.26) | (.79) | — | 14.92 | 5.20 | 287,528 | .85 | 3.49 | 26.81 |
July 31, 2003 | 15.46 | .58 | (.16) | .42 | (.59) | (.36) | (.95) | — | 14.93 | 2.71 | 368,419 | .84 | 3.76 | 42.88 |
July 31, 2002 | 15.18 | .67 | .27 | .94 | (.66) | — | (.66) | — | 15.46 | 6.38 | 363,096 | .82 | 4.39 | 54.72 |
|
|
CLASS B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2007** | $14.72 | .24(c) | .09 | .33 | (.24) | (.04) | (.28) | — | $14.77 | 2.24* | $45,567 | .75(c)* | 1.58(c)* | 8.36* |
July 31, 2006 | 15.09 | .47(c) | (.29) | .18 | (.47) | (.08) | (.55) | —(d) | 14.72 | 1.26 | 59,527 | 1.50(c) | 3.15(c) | 6.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 14.94 | .44(c) | .26 | .70 | (.44) | (.11) | (.55) | —(d) | 15.09 | 4.71 | 88,337 | 1.49(c) | 2.92(c) | 12.61 |
July 31, 2004 | 14.95 | .44 | .24 | .68 | (.43) | (.26) | (.69) | — | 14.94 | 4.52 | 110,498 | 1.50 | 2.83 | 26.81 |
July 31, 2003 | 15.48 | .48 | (.16) | .32 | (.49) | (.36) | (.85) | — | 14.95 | 2.04 | 150,266 | 1.49 | 3.10 | 42.88 |
July 31, 2002 | 15.20 | .59 | .27 | .86 | (.58) | — | (.58) | — | 15.48 | 5.81 | 171,801 | 1.35 | 3.86 | 54.72 |
|
|
CLASS C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2007** | $14.73 | .23(c) | .09 | .32 | (.23) | (.04) | (.27) | — | $14.78 | 2.21* | $8,458 | .83(c)* | 1.51(c)* | 8.36* |
July 31, 2006 | 15.09 | .45(c) | (.29) | .16 | (.44) | (.08) | (.52) | —(d) | 14.73 | 1.12 | 8,723 | 1.65(c) | 3.01(c) | 6.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 14.94 | .42(c) | .26 | .68 | (.42) | (.11) | (.53) | —(d) | 15.09 | 4.54 | 8,835 | 1.64(c) | 2.77(c) | 12.61 |
July 31, 2004 | 14.95 | .41 | .25 | .66 | (.41) | (.26) | (.67) | — | 14.94 | 4.40 | 10,097 | 1.65 | 2.69 | 26.81 |
July 31, 2003 | 15.49 | .46 | (.17) | .29 | (.47) | (.36) | (.83) | — | 14.95 | 1.82 | 13,793 | 1.64 | 2.95 | 42.88 |
July 31, 2002 | 15.21 | .55 | .27 | .82 | (.54) | — | (.54) | — | 15.49 | 5.53 | 11,885 | 1.62 | 3.58 | 54.72 |
|
|
CLASS M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2007** | $14.74 | .26(c) | .09 | .35 | (.26) | (.04) | (.30) | — | $14.79 | 2.46* | $1,063 | .57(c)* | 1.77(c)* | 8.36* |
July 31, 2006 | 15.11 | .53(c) | (.30) | .23 | (.52) | (.08) | (.60) | —(d) | 14.74 | 1.55 | 1,124 | 1.15(c) | 3.51(c) | 6.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 14.96 | .50(c) | .25 | .75 | (.49) | (.11) | (.60) | —(d) | 15.11 | 5.05 | 1,135 | 1.14(c) | 3.27(c) | 12.61 |
July 31, 2004 | 14.97 | .49 | .24 | .73 | (.48) | (.26) | (.74) | — | 14.96 | 4.93 | 1,188 | 1.15 | 3.19 | 26.81 |
July 31, 2003 | 15.50 | .54 | (.16) | .38 | (.55) | (.36) | (.91) | — | 14.97 | 2.40 | 2,148 | 1.14 | 3.45 | 42.88 |
July 31, 2002 | 15.22 | .62 | .28 | .90 | (.62) | — | (.62) | — | 15.50 | 6.05 | 2,154 | 1.12 | 4.08 | 54.72 |
|
* Not annualized.
** Unaudited.
(a) Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.
(b) Includes amounts paid through expense offset arrangements (Note 2).
(c) Reflects an involuntary contractual expense limitation in effect during the period. As a result of such limitation, the expenses of each class, as a percentage of its net assets, reflect a reduction of the following amounts (Note 2):
| 1/31/07 | 7/31/06 | 7/31/05 |
|
Class A | <0.01% | <0.01% | <0.01% |
|
Class B | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
|
Class C | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
|
Class M | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
|
(d) Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to financial statements 1/31/07 (Unaudited)
Note 1: Significant accounting policies
Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund (the “fund”) is a series of Putnam Tax Free Income Trust (the “trust”), a Massachusetts business trust, which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open end management investment company. The fund pursues its objective of seeking high current income exempt from federal income tax by investing in tax exempt securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest, are rated AAA or Aaa, or are backed by the U.S. government.
The fund offers class A, class B, class C and class M shares. Class A and class M shares are sold with a maximum front-end sales charge of 3.75% and 3.25%, respectively, and generally do not pay contingent deferred sales charges. Class B shares, which convert to class A shares after approximately eight years, do not pay a front-end sales charge, and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge, if those shares are redeemed within six years of purchase. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge and do not convert to class A shares. The expenses for class A, class B, class C and class M shares may differ based on the distribution fee of each class, which is identified in Note 2.
Effective October 2, 2006, a 1.00% redemption fee may apply on any shares purchased on or after such date that are redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 7 days of purchase. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in-capital. Prior to October 2, 2006, a 2.00% redemption fee applied to any shares that were redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 5 days of purchase.
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the fund are borne pro-rata based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund, except that each class bears expenses unique to that class (including the distribution fees applicable to such classes). Each class votes as a class only with respect to its own distribution plan or other matters on which a class vote is required by law or determined by the Trustees. Shares of each class would receive their pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund, if the fund were liquidated. In addition, the Trustees declare separate dividends on each class of shares.
In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund expects the risk of material loss to be remote.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A) Security valuation Tax-exempt bonds and notes are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by an independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. Such services use information with respect to transactions in bonds, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various relationships between securities in determining value. Certain investments are also valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably expect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security
46
at a given point in time and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.
B) Security transactions and related investment income Security transactions are recorded on the trade date (the date the order to buy or sell is executed). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis.
All premiums/discounts are amortized/accreted on a yield-to-maturity basis. The premium in excess of the call price, if any, is amortized to the call date; thereafter, any remaining premium is amortized to maturity.
C) Futures and options contracts The fund may use futures and options contracts to hedge against changes in the values of securities the fund owns or expects to purchase, or for other investment purposes. The fund may also write options on swaps or securities it owns or in which it may invest to increase its current returns.
The potential risk to the fund is that the change in value of futures and options contracts may not correspond to the change in value of the hedged instruments. In addition, losses may arise from changes in the value of the underlying instruments, if there is an illiquid secondary market for the contracts, or if the counterparty to the contract is unable to perform. Risks may exceed amounts recognized on the statement of assets and liabilities. When the contract is closed, the fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Realized gains and losses on purchased options are included in realized gains and losses on investment securities. If a written call option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as an addition to sales proceeds. If a written put option is exercised, the premium originally received is re corded as a reduction to the cost of investments.
Futures contracts are valued at the quoted daily settlement prices established by the exchange on which they trade. The fund and the broker agree to exchange an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the futures contract. Such receipts or payments are known as “variation margin.” Exchange traded options are valued at the last sale price or, if no sales are reported, the last bid price for purchased options and the last ask price for written options. Options traded over-the-counter are valued using prices supplied by dealers. Futures and written option contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
D) Interest rate swap contracts The fund may enter into interest rate swap contracts, which are arrangements between two parties to exchange cash flows based on a notional principal amount, to manage the fund’s exposure to interest rates. Interest rate swap contracts are marked to market daily based upon quotations from an independent pricing service or market makers and the change, if any, is recorded as unrealized gain or loss. Payments received or made are recorded as realized gains or loss. Certain interest rate swap contracts may include extended effective dates. Income related to these swap contracts is accrued based on the terms of the contract. The fund could be exposed to credit or market risk due to unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or if the counterparty defaults on its obligation to perform. Risk of loss may exceed amounts recognized on the statement of assets and liabilities. Interest rate swap contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
E) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code, as amended. Therefore, no provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or
47
unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains.
The aggregate identified cost on a tax basis is $305,849,083, resulting in gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of $15,999,363 and $346,428, respectively, or net unrealized appreciation of $15,652,935.
F) Distributions to shareholders Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are recorded by the fund on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. Actual results may vary. Any non-taxable return of capital cannot be determined until final tax calculations are completed after the end of the fund’s fiscal year. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations.
G) Expenses of the trust Expenses directly charged or attributable to any fund will be paid from the assets of that fund. Generally, expenses of the trust will be allocated among and charged to the assets of each fund on a basis that the Trustees deem fair and equitable, which may be based on the relative assets of each fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each fund.
Note 2: Management fee, administrative
services and other transactions
Putnam Management is paid for management and investment advisory services monthly based on the average net assets of the fund. Such fee is based on the lesser of (i) and annual rate of 0.50% of the average net asset value of the fund or (ii) the following annual rates: 0.60% of the first $500 million of average net assets, 0.50% of the next $500 million, 0.45% of the next $500 million, 0.40% of the next $5 billion, 0.375% of the next $5 billion, 0.355% of the next $5 billion, and 0.34% of the next $5 billion and 0.33% thereafter.
Putnam Management has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund through June 30, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds viewed by Lipper Inc. as having the same investment classification or objective as the fund. The expense reimbursement is based on a comparison of the fund’s expenses with the average annualized operating expenses of the funds in its Lipper peer group for each calendar quarter during the fund’s last fiscal year, excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. For the six months ended January 31, 2007, Putnam Management waived $3,381 of its management fee from the fund.
For the period ended January 31, 2007, Putnam Management has assumed $58 of legal, shareholder servicing and communication, audit and Trustee fees incurred by the fund in connection with certain legal and regulatory matters (including those described in Note 5).
The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.
Custodial functions for the fund’s assets were provided by Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), a subsidiary of Putnam, LLC. PFTC received fees for custody services based on the fund’s asset level, the number of its security holdings and transaction volumes. Putnam Investor Services, a division of PFTC, provided investor servicing agent functions to the fund. Putnam Investor Services received fees for investor servicing based on the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in
48
the fund. During the period ended January 31, 2007, the fund incurred $139,094 for these services. State Street Bank and Trust Company, will begin providing custodial functions for the fund’s assets in the subsequent period.
The fund has entered into an arrangement with PFTC whereby credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances are used to reduce a portion of the fund’s expenses. For the six months ended January 31, 2007, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $79,172 under these arrangements.
Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $308, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings, industry seminars and for certain compliance-related matters. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees. George Putnam, III, who is not an independent Trustee, also receives the foregoing fees for his services as Trustee.
The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”) which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the Deferral Plan.
The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) covering all Trustees of the fund who have served as a Trustee for at least five years and were first elected prior to 2004. Benefits under the Pension Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee’s average annual attendance and retainer fees for the three years ended December 31, 2005. The retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. Pension expense for the fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the statement of operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses in the statement of assets and liabilities. The Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected after 2003.
The fund has adopted distribution plans (the “Plans”) with respect to its class A, class B, class C and class M shares pursuant to rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management at an annual rate of up to 0.35%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 1.00% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C and class M shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at the annual rate of 0.85%, 1.00% and 0.50% of the average net assets for class B, class C and class M shares, respectively. For class A shares, the annual payment rate will equal the weighted average of (i) 0.20% on the net assets of the fund attribu table to class A shares purchased and paid for prior to April 1, 2005 and (ii) 0.25% on all other net assets of the fund attributable to class A shares.
For the six months ended January 31, 2007, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $10,167 and $132 from the sale of class A and class M shares, respectively, and received $31,107 and $83 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares, respectively.
A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% is assessed on certain redemptions of class A shares that were purchased without an initial sales charge as part of an investment of $1 million or more. For the six months ended January 31, 2007, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received no monies on class A redemptions.
49
Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities
During the six months ended January 31, 2007, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments aggregated $27,115,972 and $36,861,274, respectively. There were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
Note 4: Capital shares
At January 31, 2007, there was an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
CLASS A | Shares | Amount |
| |
Six months ended 1/31/07: | |
| | |
Shares sold | 1,124,404 | $ 16,717,738 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 250,025 | 3,713,168 |
|
| 1,374,429 | 20,430,906 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (1,507,054) | (22,412,971) |
|
Net decrease | (132,625) | $ (1,982,065) |
|
Year ended 7/31/06: | | |
| | |
Shares sold | 2,665,184 | $ 39,553,953 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 546,979 | 8,115,716 |
|
| 3,212,163 | 47,669,669 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (3,269,559) | (48,448,783) |
|
Net decrease | (57,396) | $ (779,114) |
CLASS B | Shares | Amount |
| |
Six months ended 1/31/07: | |
| | |
Shares sold | 42,120 | $ 627,086 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 37,127 | 552,150 |
|
| 79,247 | 1,179,236 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (1,037,939) | (15,452,648) |
|
Net decrease | (958,692) | $(14,273,412) |
|
Year ended 7/31/06: | | |
| | |
Shares sold | 97,832 | $ 1,450,352 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 117,976 | 1,754,015 |
|
| 215,808 | 3,204,367 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (2,026,339) | (30,114,191) |
|
Net decrease | (1,810,531) | $(26,909,824) |
|
|
CLASS C | Shares | Amount |
| |
Six months ended 1/31/07: | |
| | |
Shares sold | 27,896 | $ 414,623 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 5,572 | 82,917 |
|
| 33,468 | 497,540 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (53,389) | (796,928) |
|
Net decrease | (19,921) | $ (299,388) |
|
Year ended 7/31/06: | | |
| | |
Shares sold | 114,963 | $ 1,710,272 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 14,209 | 211,211 |
|
| 129,172 | 1,921,483 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (122,108) | (1,815,465) |
|
Net increase | 7,064 | $ 106,018 |
50
CLASS M | Shares | Amount |
| | |
Six months ended 1/31/07: | | |
| | |
Shares sold | 3,673 | $ 55,051 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 1,097 | 16,335 |
|
| 4,770 | 71,386 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (9,167) | (136,421) |
|
Net decrease | (4,397) | $ (65,035) |
|
Year ended 7/31/06: | | |
| | |
Shares sold | 5,060 | $ 76,085 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 2,491 | 37,062 |
|
| 7,551 | 113,147 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (6,423) | (95,418) |
|
Net increase | 1,128 | $ 17,729 |
Note 5: Regulatory matters and litigation
In late 2003 and 2004, Putnam Management settled charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division (“MSD”) in connection with excessive short-term trading by certain former Putnam employees and, in the case of charges brought by the MSD, excessive short-term trading by participants in some Putnam-administered 401(k) plans. Putnam Management agreed to pay $193.5 million in penalties and restitution, of which $153.5 million will be distributed to certain open-end Putnam funds and their shareholders after the SEC and MSD approve a distribution plan being developed by an independent consultant. The allegations of the SEC and MSD and related matters have served as the general basis for certain lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits filed against Putnam Management and, in a limited number of cases, against some Putnam funds. Putnam Management believes that these lawsuits will have no material adverse effect on the funds or on Putnam Management’s ability to provide investment management services. In addition, Putnam Management has agreed to bear any costs incurred by the Putnam funds as a result of these matters.
Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management are named as defendants in a civil suit in which the plaintiffs allege that the management and distribution fees paid by certain Putnam funds were excessive and seek recovery under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management have contested the plaintiffs’ claims and the matter is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Based on currently available information, Putnam Management believes that this action is without merit and that it is unlikely to have a material effect on Putnam Management’s and Putnam Retail Management’s ability to provide services to their clients, including the fund.
Note 6: New accounting pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (the “Interpretation”). The Interpretation prescribes a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken by a filer in the filer’s tax return. The Interpretation will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 but will also apply to tax positions reflected in the fund’s financial statements as of that date. No determination has been made whether the adoption of the Interpretation will require the fund to make any adjustments to its net assets or have any other effect on the fund’s financial statements. The effects of implementing this pr onouncement, if any, will be noted in the fund’s next semiannual financial statements.
51
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (the “Standard”). The Standard defines fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The Standard applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards. The Standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Putnam Management is currently evaluating what impact the adoption of the Standard will have on the fund’s financial statements.
52
Fund information
Founded over 65 years ago, Putnam Investments was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We manage over 100 mutual funds in growth, value, blend, fixed income, and international.
Investment Manager | Officers | Francis J. McNamara, III |
Putnam Investment | George Putnam, III | Vice President and Chief |
Management, LLC | President | Legal Officer |
One Post Office Square | | |
Boston, MA 02109 | Charles E. Porter | Charles A. Ruys de Perez |
| Executive Vice President, | Vice President and Chief |
Marketing Services | Principal Executive Officer, | Compliance Officer |
Putnam Retail Management | Associate Treasurer and | |
One Post Office Square | Compliance Liaison | Mark C. Trenchard |
Boston, MA 02109 | | Vice President and BSA |
| Jonathan S. Horwitz | Compliance Officer |
Custodians | Senior Vice President | |
Putnam Fiduciary Trust | and Treasurer | Judith Cohen |
Company, State Street Bank | | Vice President, Clerk and |
and Trust Company | Steven D. Krichmar | Assistant Treasurer |
| Vice President and | |
Legal Counsel | Principal Financial Officer | Wanda M. McManus |
Ropes & Gray LLP | | Vice President, Senior Associate |
| Janet C. Smith | Treasurer and Assistant Clerk |
Trustees | Vice President, Principal | |
John A. Hill, Chairman | Accounting Officer and | Nancy E. Florek |
Jameson Adkins Baxter, | Assistant Treasurer | Vice President, Assistant Clerk, |
Vice Chairman | | Assistant Treasurer and |
Charles B. Curtis | Susan G. Malloy | Proxy Manager |
Myra R. Drucker | Vice President and | |
Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. | Assistant Treasurer | |
Paul L. Joskow | | |
Elizabeth T. Kennan | Beth S. Mazor | |
Kenneth R. Leibler | Vice President | |
Robert E. Patterson | | |
George Putnam, III | James P. Pappas | |
W. Thomas Stephens | Vice President | |
Richard B. Worley | | |
| Richard S. Robie, III | |
| Vice President | |
This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit www.putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.
Item 2. Code of Ethics:
Not applicable
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:
Not applicable
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:
Not applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments:
The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to shareholders in Item 1 above.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management Investment Companies:
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies
Not Applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers:
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
Not applicable
Item 11. Controls and Procedures:
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting:
Effective January 1, 2007, the fund retained State Street Bank and Trust Company ("State Street") as its custodian. Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company, the fund's previous custodian, is managing the transfer of the fund's assets to State Street. This transfer is expected to be completed for all Putnam funds during the first half of 2007, with PFTC remaining as custodian with respect to fund assets until the assets are transferred. Also effective January 1, 2007, the fund's investment manager, Putnam
Investment Management, LLC entered into a Master Sub-Accounting Services Agreement with State Street, under which the investment manager has delegated to State Street responsibility for providing certain administrative, pricing, and bookkeeping services for the fund.
Item 12. Exhibits:
(a)(1) Not applicable
(a)(2) Separate certifications for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Putnam Tax Free Income Trust
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 28, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Charles E. Porter
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer
Date: March 28, 2007
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2007
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: (811- 04345 )
Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: | Putnam Tax Free Income Trust |
|
Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|
Name and address of agent for service: | Beth S. Mazor, Vice President |
| One Post Office Square |
| Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
|
Copy to: | John W. Gerstmayr, Esq. |
| Ropes & Gray LLP |
| One International Place |
| Boston, Massachusetts 02110 |
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | (617) 292-1000 | |
Date of fiscal year end: July 31, 2007
Date of reporting period: August 1, 2006— January 31, 2007
Item 1. Report to Stockholders:
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:
What makes Putnam different?
In 1830, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Samuel Putnam established The Prudent Man Rule, a legal foundation for responsible money management.
THE PRUDENT MAN RULE
All that can be required of a trustee to invest is that he shall conduct himself faithfully and exercise a sound discretion. He is to observe how men of prudence, discretion, and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the permanent disposition of their funds, considering the probable income, as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested.
A time-honored tradition in money management
Since 1937, our values have been rooted in a profound sense of responsibility for the money entrusted to us.
A prudent approach to investing
We use a research-driven team approach to seek consistent, dependable, superior investment results over time, although there is no guarantee a fund will meet its objectives.
Funds for every investment goal
We offer a broad range of mutual funds and other financial products so investors and their financial representatives can build diversified portfolios.
A commitment to doing what’s right for investors
We have below-average expenses and stringent investor protections, and provide a wealth of information about the Putnam funds.
Industry-leading service
We help investors, along with their financial representatives, make informed investment decisions with confidence.
Putnam
Tax-Free
High Yield Fund
1| 31| 07
Semiannual Report
Message from the Trustees | 2 |
About the fund | 4 |
Report from the fund managers | 7 |
Performance | 13 |
Expenses | 16 |
Portfolio turnover | 18 |
Risk | 19 |
Your fund’s management | 20 |
Terms and definitions | 23 |
Trustee approval of management contract | 25 |
Other information for shareholders | 30 |
Financial statements | 31 |
Cover photograph: © Richard H. Johnson
Message from the Trustees
Dear Fellow Shareholder
Although the global economy continues to move forward, it has become apparent over the past few months that certain sectors of the U.S. economy may have slowed somewhat. We consequently consider slower job growth and perhaps a rise in the unemployment rate as possible developments for 2007. On the other hand, since the Federal Reserve (the Fed) stopped raising interest rates, stock prices have moved higher, bond yields have remained relatively low, and the weaker dollar appears to be making U.S. exports more competitive. With the benefit of this financial cushion, we believe 2007 may hold the potential for a renewed economic expansion.
As you may have heard, on February 1, 2007, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. announced that it had signed a definitive agreement to sell its ownership interest in Putnam Investments Trust, the parent company of Putnam Management and its affiliates, to Great-West Lifeco Inc. Great-West Lifeco Inc. is a financial services holding company with operations in Canada, the United States, and Europe and is a member of the Power Financial Corporation group of companies. This transaction is subject to regulatory approvals and other conditions, including the approval of new management contracts by shareholders of a substantial number of Putnam funds at shareholder meetings expected to be held in May 2007. Proxy solicitation materials related to these meetings, which provide detailed information regarding the proposed transaction, were recently mailed. The transaction is currently expected to be completed by the middle of 2007.
Putnam’s team of investment and business professionals will continue to be led by Putnam President and Chief Executive Officer Ed Haldeman. Your Trustees have been actively involved through every step of the discussions, and we will continue in our role of overseeing the Putnam funds on your behalf.
2
We would like to take this opportunity to announce that a new independent Trustee, Kenneth R. Leibler, has joined your fund’s Board of Trustees. Mr. Leibler has had a distinguished career as a leader in the investment management industry. He is the founding Chairman of the Boston Options Exchange and currently serves as a Trustee of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston; a lead director of Ruder Finn Group, a global communications and advertising firm; and a director of Northeast Utilities.
In the following pages, members of your fund’s management team discuss the fund’s performance and strategies for the fiscal period ended January 31, 2007, and provide their outlook for the months ahead. As always, we thank you for your support of the Putnam funds.
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund: potential for high
current income exempt from federal income tax
Two of the most significant challenges of fixed-income investing are low interest rates and taxes on income. Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund helps investors reduce the impact of both by investing in higher-yielding municipal bonds, which offer the potential for a greater stream of income along with tax advantages. While the stated yields on municipal bonds are lower than those of taxable bonds, the income most of these bonds pay is exempt from federal income tax.
Municipal bonds are typically issued by states and local municipalities to raise funds for building and maintaining public facilities. The income from a municipal bond is generally exempt from federal income tax, and from state taxes for residents of the state in which the bond is issued. Municipal bonds are backed by either the issuing city or town or by revenues collected from usage fees, and as a result have varying degrees of credit risk (the risk that the issuer won’t be able to repay the bond).
Many high-yield municipal bonds are not rated by independent rating agencies such as Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. This is mainly because many issuers decide not to pursue a rating that might be below investment grade. As a result, investment managers must do additional research to determine whether these bonds are prudent investments.
Evaluating a bond’s credit risk is one area in which Putnam has particular expertise. Putnam’s municipal bond research team analyzes each issue in depth and assigns unrated bonds an agency-equivalent Putnam rating — instead of rating bonds on a pass/fail basis, which is a common practice in the industry. Although unrated bonds typically represent only a small portion of the fund’s holdings, this analysis helps the management team in identifying bonds with attractive risk/return profiles from among this group.
Once the fund has invested in a bond, the fund’s management team continues to monitor developments that affect the bond market, the specific sector (for example, hospitals or utilities), and the issuer of the bond. Typically, higher-risk, lower-rated bonds are reviewed more frequently because of their greater potential risk.
The goal of the fund’s approach to research and active management is to stay a step ahead of the industry and pinpoint opportunities to adjust the fund’s holdings for the benefit of the fund and its shareholders.
Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes. Tax-free funds may not be suitable for IRAs and other non-taxable accounts. Please consult with your tax advisor for more information. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses.
Understanding
tax-equivalent yield
To understand the value of tax-free income, it is helpful to compare a municipal bond’s yield with the “tax-equivalent yield” — the before-tax yield that must be offered by a taxable bond in order to equal the municipal bond’s yield after taxes.
How to calculate tax-equivalent yield:
The tax-equivalent yield equals the municipal bond’s yield divided by “one minus the tax rate.” For example, if a municipal bond’s yield is 5%, then its tax-equivalent yield is 7.7%, assuming the maximum 35% federal tax rate for 2007.
Results for investors subject to lower tax rates would not be as advantageous.
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund seeks a high level of current income free from federal income tax by investing in a diversified portfolio of lower-rated and investment-grade municipal bonds. The fund may be appropriate for investors seeking tax-advantaged income who are willing to accept some credit risk.
Highlights
• For the six months ended January 31, 2007, Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund’s class A shares returned 3.29% without sales charges.
• The fund’s benchmark, the Lehman Municipal Bond Index, returned 3.06% for the period.
• The average return for the fund’s Lipper category, High Yield Municipal Debt Funds, was 3.96% .
• Additional fund performance, comparative performance, and Lipper data can be found in the performance section beginning on page 13.
Performance
Total return for class A shares for periods ended 1/31/07
Since the fund’s inception (9/9/85), average annual return is 6.81% at NAV and 6.62% at POP.*
| | Average annual return | | | Cumulative return | |
| | NAV | | POP | | | | NAV | | POP | | |
|
10 years | 4.78% | | 4.39% | | | 59.57% | | 53.64% | | |
|
5 years | 5.49 | | 4.67 | | | 30.61 | | 25.64 | | |
|
3 years | 6.06 | | 4.71 | | | 19.29 | | 14.79 | | |
|
1 year | 5.76 | | 1.91 | | | 5.76 | | 1.91 | | |
|
6 months | — | | — | | | 3.29 | | –0.53 | | |
|
Data is historical. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Returns at POP reflect a maximum sales charge of 3.75% . For the most recent month-end performance, visit www.putnam.com. For a portion of the period, this fund limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower. A 1% short-term trading fee may apply.
*Performance for class A shares before their inception (9/20/93) is derived from the historical performance of class B shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge, but not adjusted to reflect the lower operating expenses of class A shares.
6
Report from the fund managers
The period in review
During the six months ended January 31, 2007, lower-quality, high-yielding municipal bonds maintained their previous lead over higher-quality, lower-yielding issues, although that lead has diminished somewhat. Your fund’s results at net asset value (NAV, or without sales charges) remained slightly ahead of its benchmark, the Lehman Municipal Bond Index, which is composed of investment-grade bonds. However, our avoidance of some of the highest-risk areas of the market — in particular, airline-related bonds — caused the fund’s results to slightly lag the average for its Lipper peer group. In addition, although we lengthened the portfolio’s duration — a measure of interest-rate sensitivity — in December and January, we had kept it shorter, or more defensive, earlier in the period. Overall, this cautious positioning detracted modestly from performance, although the portfolio’s diversification and our emphasis on tobacco settlement and single-family housing bonds made a positive contribution.
Market overview
Just as the fund’s 2007 fiscal year began, in August 2006, the Fed suspended its credit-tightening program, which had included 17 successive increases in the federal funds rate since June 30, 2004. Over the course of the past six months, the Fed has held this benchmark rate —the rate for overnight loans between banks — steady at 5.25% . Statements from the Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s policy-setting panel, indicate that future rate decisions will depend on whether inflation remains in check.
As the market responded to the Fed’s rate-tightening pause, bond yields declined across the maturity spectrum, resulting in an impressive rally, especially among long-term bonds. In fact, because yields on longer-term bonds declined more than yields on shorter-term bonds, the yield curve flattened. The yield curve is a graphical representation of the difference in yield for bonds of comparable quality plotted from the shortest to the longest maturity. Tax-exempt bonds with shorter maturities underperformed taxable
7
bonds in comparable maturity ranges, but long-term tax-exempt bonds modestly outperformed comparable taxable bonds.
A generally robust economy, coupled with solid demand from buyers searching for higher yields, contributed to the strong relative performance of lower-rated bonds. Among uninsured bonds in general, and especially bonds rated Baa and below, yield spreads tightened as lower-rated bonds performed better than higher-rated bonds. Non-rated bonds also rallied.
Market sectors that performed particularly well during the period included airline-related industrial development bonds (IDBs); securities issued by hospitals, utilities, and long-term care facilities; and land-secured bonds. Tobacco settlement bonds, meanwhile, underperformed other credit-sensitive sectors modestly, but still outperformed higher-rated bonds.
Strategy overview
Given our expectation for rising interest rates, we maintained a short (defensive) portfolio duration relative to the fund’s Lipper peer group. Duration is a measure of a fund’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Having a shorter-duration portfolio may help protect principal when interest rates rise, but it can reduce appreciation potential when rates fall. This strategy detracted moderately from results since bonds with longer maturities generally
Market sector performance
These indexes provide an overview of performance in different market sectors for the six months ended 1/31/07.
Bonds | |
|
Lehman Municipal Bond Index (tax-exempt bonds) | 3.06% |
|
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index (broad bond market) | 3.65% |
|
Lehman GNMA Index (Government National Mortgage Association bonds) | 3.70% |
|
Lehman Intermediate Treasury Bond Index (intermediate-maturity U.S. Treasury bonds) | 2.64% |
|
Equities | |
|
S&P 500 Index (broad stock market) | 13.75% |
|
Russell 2000 Growth Index (small-company growth stocks) | 14.81% |
|
8
outperformed those with shorter maturities. By the end of the period, we had extended the fund’s duration relative to its peer group, but it still remained modestly short on a relative basis.
The fund’s higher overall credit quality held back performance relative to its peer group, as the lower-quality tiers of the municipal bond market delivered the strongest results during the period. In particular, the fund’s underweight position in airline-related IDBs, relative to its peer group, detracted from performance as this sector posted especially strong results for the period.
Relative to the fund’s peer group, we maintained an overweight position in single-family housing bonds. This strategy proved helpful to results as declining mortgage prepayments continued to support bonds in this sector.
Your fund’s holdings
Despite ongoing volatility in this market sector, your fund continued to benefit from its emphasis on tobacco settlement bonds during the period. Limited issuance of these securities, coupled with strong investor demand, provided solid supply-and-demand support for the sector, boosting results. Payments from tobacco settlement bonds are secured by income from tobacco companies’ settlement obligations to the municipalities that issue them. Such bonds generally offer higher yields than other bonds of comparable quality.
Comparison of the fund’s maturity and duration
This chart compares changes in the fund’s average effective maturity (a weighted average of the holdings’ maturities) and its average effective duration (a measure of its sensitivity to interest-rate changes).
Average effective duration and average effective maturity take into account put and call features, where applicable, and reflect prepayments for mortgage-backed securities. Duration is usually shorter than maturity because it reflects interest payments on a bond prior to its maturity.
9
We also like the diversification that tobacco settlement bonds provide, since their performance is not as closely tied to economic growth as holdings from many other sectors.
Your fund owns tobacco settlement bonds issued in several states, all of which performed well, but bonds issued by the Tobacco Settlement Authority of Iowa were particularly strong during the period. We purchased them in 2005 because we considered their structure and coupon attractive. Recently, investors who believe these bonds will be pre-refunded began bidding up the price of these bonds. Pre-refunding occurs when an issuer refinances an older, high-coupon bond by issuing new bonds at current, lower interest rates.
The proceeds are invested in a secure investment (usually U.S. Treasury securities), and the older bond’s first call date becomes the new effective maturity date. The secure backing has the effect of raising the bond’s perceived credit rating while the shorter effective maturity lowers its interest-rate risk. Since both these developments are favorable for investors, bond prices often rise after pre-refunding. There is no assurance that this will happen, since the pre-refunding has not yet taken place, but the fund has already benefited from the increased demand for these Iowa tobacco settlement bonds.
Another issue that contributed to your fund’s performance was, in fact, pre-refunded and increased in value as
Credit quality overview
Credit qualities shown as a percentage of portfolio value as of 1/31/07. A bond rated Baa or higher (MIG3/VMIG3 or higher, for short-term debt) is considered investment grade. The chart reflects Moody’s ratings; percentages may include bonds not rated by Moody’s but considered by Putnam Management to be of comparable quality. Ratings will vary over time.
10
a result. In November, bonds issued by the Pennsylvania Higher Education Authority for Jenners Pond Nursing Home were pre-refunded, contributing positively to performance for the period.
It is worth noting that the concept of prudent risk underlies Putnam’s investment policies for all funds, even those that are designed to aggressively pursue income, such as Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund. For some time now, we have felt the risks of investing in bonds with longer maturities and lower quality were not adequately balanced by the potential rewards, so we have limited the fund’s exposure to such bonds. Other fund groups have been less cautious, and our defensive strategies have limited the fund’s participation as bond prices proved healthier than anticipated. This was most evident with regard to the fund’s position in airline-related industrial revenue bonds (IDBs), which remains small in comparison to other funds. IDBs are issued by municipalities but backed by the credit of the institution benefiting from the financing. Investor perceptions about the backer’s stability, or that of its industry group, can affect the prices of these bonds more than the rating of the issuing municipality. Airline profits plunged after the terrorist attacks of September 2001 and several major carriers went into bankruptcy, but the industry rebounded in 2006 and early in 2007, as energy prices declined and more people took to the air. Although the airline business appears to be regaining stability, we still believe caution is warranted.
However, we have been building the fund’s position in single-family housing bonds. In general, single-family housing bonds tend to perform well when interest rates are expected to rise because investors are less concerned about refinancing. With the yield difference between lower- and higher-quality bonds now extremely narrow, our analysts’ research helped identify single-family housing issues with relatively high ratings and attractive yields. We believe the issues we selected give us an opportunity to add to the portfolio’s diversification and maintain its income target without sacrificing quality.
Please note that the holdings discussed in this report may not have been held by the fund for the entire period. Portfolio composition is subject to review in accordance with the fund’s investment strategy and may vary in the future.
11
The outlook for your fund
The following commentary reflects anticipated developments that could affect your fund over the next six months, as well as your management team’s plans for responding to them.
We continue to monitor indications of Fed policy and how they are likely to affect its efforts to engineer a “soft landing” for the economy. A soft landing occurs when economic growth slows but is still solid enough to sustain job creation and corporate profits. Therefore, while we anticipate that economic growth is likely to slow as we move further into 2007, we plan to maintain a defensive duration strategy until longer-range Fed policy becomes clearer. In addition, given the municipal bond market’s exceptionally strong performance relative to Treasuries throughout the period, valuations have become elevated to levels that, we believe, argue in favor of maintaining a defensive approach over the near term.
In our view, the extended rally among lower-rated, higher-yielding bonds may be in its final stages. We base this view, in part, on the fact that the difference in yield between Aaa-rated bonds and Baa-rated bonds — the highest and lowest investment-grade ratings, respectively — is at its narrowest point since late 1999. In other words, the higher-income advantage available to those willing to assume additional credit risk has diminished substantially. It has been our experience that when investor demand is this high, many high-yielding securities can become overpriced. We continue to believe that this is not the most opportune time to reach too far out in time, or too far down in quality, to seek higher income. Over the near term, we will continue to focus on some areas — notably, single-family housing and power company IDBs — where we believe the fund may benefit from ongoing economic growth without being exposed to undue risk.
The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management. They are not meant as investment advice.
Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes. Tax-free funds may not be suitable for IRAs and other non-taxable accounts. Please consult with your tax advisor for more information. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses.
12
Your fund’s performance
This section shows your fund’s performance for periods ended January 31, 2007, the end of the first half of its current fiscal year. In accordance with regulatory requirements for mutual funds, we also include performance as of the most recent calendar quarter-end. Performance should always be considered in light of a fund’s investment strategy. Data represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. For the most recent month-end performance, please visit www.putnam.com or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund performance
Total return for periods ended 1/31/07
| | Class A | | | | Class B | | | | Class C | | | | Class M | | |
(inception dates) | | (9/20/93) | | | | (9/9/85) | | | | (2/1/99) | | | | (12/29/94) | | |
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP |
|
Annual average | | | | | | | | |
(life of fund) | 6.81% | 6.62% | 6.42% | 6.42% | 5.95% | 5.95% | 6.58% | 6.42% |
|
10 years | 59.57 | 53.64 | 50.66 | 50.66 | 47.20 | 47.20 | 54.93 | 49.90 |
Annual average | 4.78 | 4.39 | 4.18 | 4.18 | 3.94 | 3.94 | 4.48 | 4.13 |
|
5 years | 30.61 | 25.64 | 26.72 | 24.72 | 25.43 | 25.43 | 28.74 | 24.51 |
Annual average | 5.49 | 4.67 | 4.85 | 4.52 | 4.64 | 4.64 | 5.18 | 4.48 |
|
3 years | 19.29 | 14.79 | 17.00 | 13.99 | 16.39 | 16.39 | 18.24 | 14.48 |
Annual average | 6.06 | 4.71 | 5.37 | 4.46 | 5.19 | 5.19 | 5.74 | 4.61 |
|
1 year | 5.76 | 1.91 | 5.20 | 0.20 | 4.84 | 3.84 | 5.48 | 2.06 |
|
6 months | 3.29 | –0.53 | 2.99 | –2.01 | 2.77 | 1.77 | 3.13 | –0.25 |
|
Performance assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Returns at public offering price (POP) for class A and M shares reflect a maximum sales charge of 3.75% and 3.25%, respectively. Class B share returns reflect the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), which is 5% in the first year, declining to 1% in the sixth year, and is eliminated thereafter. Class C shares reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year and is eliminated thereafter. Performance for class A, C, and M shares before their inception is derived from the historical performance of class B shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC) and, for class C shares, the higher operating expenses for such shares.
For a portion of the period, this fund limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower.
A 1% short-term trading fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase.
13
Comparative index returns
For periods ended 1/31/07
| | | | Lipper High Yield |
| | | Lehman Municipal | | | Municipal Debt Funds |
| | | Bond Index | | | category average* |
|
Annual average | | |
(life of fund) | 7.51% | 6.92% |
|
10 years | 74.22 | 67.74 |
Annual average | 5.71 | 5.28 |
|
5 years | 28.32 | 36.09 |
Annual average | 5.11 | 6.33 |
|
3 years | 12.45 | 19.75 |
Annual average | 3.99 | 6.18 |
|
1 year | 4.29 | 6.79 |
|
6 months | 3.06 | 3.96 |
|
Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.
* Over the 6-month and 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year periods ended 1/31/07, there were 82, 78, 73, 66, and 38 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.
14
Fund price and distribution information
For the six-month period ended 1/31/07
Distributions* | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class M | |
|
Number | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
|
Income1 | $0.312988 | $0.272064 | $0.261654 | $0.294490 |
|
Capital gains2 | — | — | — | — |
|
Total | $0.312988 | $0.272064 | $0.261654 | $0.294490 |
|
Share value: | NAV | POP | NAV | NAV | NAV | POP |
|
7/31/06 | $12.95 | $13.45 | $12.97 | $12.96 | $12.95 | $13.39 |
|
1/31/07 | 13.06 | 13.57 | 13.08 | 13.06 | 13.06 | 13.50 |
|
Current yield (end of period) | | | | | | |
|
Current dividend rate3 | 4.70% | 4.53% | 4.07% | 3.92% | 4.42% | 4.28% |
|
Taxable equivalent4 | 7.23 | 6.97 | 6.26 | 6.03 | 6.80 | 6.58 |
|
Current 30-day SEC yield5 | 3.93 | 3.78 | 3.30 | 3.15 | 3.65 | 3.53 |
|
Taxable equivalent4 | 6.05 | 5.82 | 5.08 | 4.85 | 5.62 | 5.43 |
|
* Dividend sources are estimated and may vary based on final tax calculations after the fund’s fiscal year-end.
1 For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes.
2 Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes.
3 Most recent distribution, excluding capital gains, annualized and divided by NAV or POP at end of period.
4 Assumes maximum 35% federal tax rate for 2007. Results for investors subject to lower tax rates would not be as advantageous.
5 Based only on investment income, calculated using SEC guidelines.
Fund performance as of most recent calendar quarter
Total return for periods ended 12/31/06
| | Class A | | | | Class B | | | | Class C | | | | Class M | | |
(inception dates) | | (9/20/93) | | | | (9/9/85) | | | | (2/1/99) | | | | (12/29/94) | | |
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP |
|
Annual average | | | | | | | | |
(life of fund) | 6.84% | 6.65% | 6.44% | 6.44% | 5.98% | 5.98% | 6.61% | 6.45% |
|
10 years | 60.10 | 54.24 | 51.22 | 51.22 | 47.71 | 47.71 | 55.46 | 50.44 |
Annual average | 4.82 | 4.43 | 4.22 | 4.22 | 3.98 | 3.98 | 4.51 | 4.17 |
|
5 years | 31.50 | 26.51 | 27.60 | 25.60 | 26.37 | 26.37 | 29.59 | 25.38 |
Annual average | 5.63 | 4.82 | 5.00 | 4.66 | 4.79 | 4.79 | 5.32 | 4.63 |
|
3 years | 20.45 | 15.91 | 18.17 | 15.17 | 17.51 | 17.51 | 19.39 | 15.55 |
Annual average | 6.40 | 5.04 | 5.72 | 4.82 | 5.53 | 5.53 | 6.09 | 4.94 |
|
1 year | 6.17 | 2.31 | 5.60 | 0.60 | 5.24 | 4.24 | 5.88 | 2.44 |
|
6 months | 4.24 | 0.38 | 3.95 | –1.05 | 3.73 | 2.73 | 4.07 | 0.71 |
|
15
Your fund’s expenses
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees, distribution fees (12b-1 fees), and other expenses. In the most recent six-month period, your fund limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You may also pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial advisor.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund from August 1, 2006, to January 31, 2007. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000* | $ 4.15 | $ 7.37 | $ 8.13 | $ 5.58 |
|
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,032.90 | $1,029.90 | $1,027.70 | $1,031.30 |
|
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 1/31/07. The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Estimate the expenses you paid
To estimate the ongoing expenses you paid for the six months ended January 31, 2007, use the calculation method below. To find the value of your investment on August 1, 2006, go to www.putnam.com and log on to your account. Click on the “Transaction History” tab in your Daily Statement and enter 08/01/2006 in both the “from” and “to” fields. Alternatively, call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.
16
Compare expenses using the SEC’s method
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total costs) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000* | $ 4.13 | $ 7.32 | $ 8.08 | $ 5.55 |
|
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,021.12 | $1,017.95 | $1,017.19 | $1,019.71 |
|
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 1/31/07. The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Compare expenses using industry averages
You can also compare your fund’s expenses with the average of its peer group, as defined by Lipper, an independent fund-rating agency that ranks funds relative to others that Lipper considers to have similar investment styles or objectives. The expense ratio for each share class shown below indicates how much of your fund’s average net assets have been used to pay ongoing expenses during the period.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M |
|
Your fund’s annualized | | | | |
expense ratio | 0.81% | 1.44% | 1.59% | 1.09% |
|
Average annualized expense | | | | |
ratio for Lipper peer group* | 0.86% | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.14% |
|
* Simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds in the fund’s Lipper peer group, calculated in accordance with Lipper’s standard method for comparing fund expenses (excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses). This average reflects each fund’s expenses for its most recent fiscal year available to Lipper as of 12/31/06. To facilitate comparison, Putnam has adjusted this average to reflect the 12b-1 fees carried by each class of shares. The peer group may include funds that are significantly smaller or larger than the fund, which may limit the comparability of the fund’s expenses to the simple average, which typically is higher than the asset-weighted average.
17
Your fund’s
portfolio turnover
Putnam funds are actively managed by teams of experts who buy and sell securities based on intensive analysis of companies, industries, economies, and markets. Portfolio turnover is a measure of how often a fund’s managers buy and sell securities for your fund. A portfolio turnover of 100%, for example, means that the managers sold and replaced securities valued at 100% of a fund’s assets within a one-year period. Funds with high turnover may be more likely to generate capital gains and dividends that must be distributed to shareholders as taxable income. High turnover may also cause a fund to pay more brokerage commissions and other transaction costs, which may detract from performance.
Funds that invest in bonds or other fixed-income instruments may have higher turnover than funds that invest only in stocks. Short-term bond funds tend to have higher turnover than longer-term bond funds, because shorter-term bonds will mature or be sold more frequently than longer-term bonds. You can use the table below to compare your fund’s turnover with the average turnover for funds in its Lipper category.
Turnover comparisons
Percentage of holdings that change every year
| 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 |
|
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund | 17% | 21% | 18% | 29% | 20% |
|
Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt | | | | | |
Funds category average | 32% | 33% | 30% | 30% | 34% |
|
Turnover data for the fund is calculated based on the fund’s fiscal-year period, which ends on July 31. Turnover data for the fund’s Lipper category is calculated based on the average of the turnover of each fund in the category for its fiscal year ended during the indicated year. Fiscal years vary across funds in the Lipper category, which may limit the comparability of the fund’s portfolio turnover rate to the Lipper average. Comparative data for 2006 is based on information available as of 12/31/06.
18
Your fund’s risk
This risk comparison is designed to help you understand how your fund compares with other funds. The comparison utilizes a risk measure developed by Morningstar, an independent fund-rating agency. This risk measure is referred to as the fund’s Morningstar Risk.
Your fund’s Morningstar® Risk
Your fund’s Morningstar Risk is shown alongside that of the average fund in its Morningstar category. The risk bar broadens the comparison by translating the fund’s Morningstar Risk into a percentile, which is based on the fund’s ranking among all funds rated by Morningstar as of December 31, 2006. A higher Morningstar Risk generally indicates that a fund’s monthly returns have varied more widely.
Morningstar determines a fund’s Morningstar Risk by assessing variations in the fund’s monthly returns — with an emphasis on downside variations — over a 3-year period, if available. Those measures are weighted and averaged to produce the fund’s Morningstar Risk. The information shown is provided for the fund’s class A shares only; information for other classes may vary. Morningstar Risk is based on historical data and does not indicate future results. Morningstar does not purport to measure the risk associated with a current investment in a fund, either on an absolute basis or on a relative basis. Low Morningstar Risk does not mean that you cannot lose money on an investment in a fund. Copyright 2007 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete, or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.
19
Your fund’s management
Your fund is managed by the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt Fixed-Income Team. Paul Drury is the Portfolio Leader, and Brad Libby, Susan McCormack, and Thalia Meehan are Portfolio Members of your fund. The Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members coordinate the team’s management of the fund.
For a complete listing of the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt Fixed-Income Team, including those who are not Portfolio Leaders or Portfolio Members of your fund, visit Putnam’s Individual Investor Web site at www.putnam.com.
Investment team fund ownership
The table below shows how much the fund’s current Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members have invested in the fund and in all Putnam mutual funds (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of January 31, 2007, and January 31, 2006.
N/A indicates the individual was not a Portfolio Leader or Portfolio Member as of 1/31/06.
Trustee and Putnam employee fund ownership
As of January 31, 2007, all of the Trustees of the Putnam funds owned fund shares. The table below shows the approximate value of investments in the fund and all Putnam funds as of that date by the Trustees and Putnam employees. These amounts include investments by the Trustees’ and employees’ immediate family members and investments through retirement and deferred compensation plans.
| | Total assets in |
| Assets in the fund | all Putnam funds |
|
Trustees | $103,000 | $101,000,000 |
|
Putnam employees | $584,000 | $454,000,000 |
|
20
Fund manager compensation
The total 2006 fund manager compensation that is attributable to your fund is approximately $400,000. This amount includes a portion of 2006 compensation paid by Putnam Management to the fund managers listed in this section for their portfolio management responsibilities, calculated based on the fund assets they manage taken as a percentage of the total assets they manage. The compensation amount also includes a portion of the 2006 compensation paid to the Chief Investment Officer of the team and the Group Chief Investment Officer of the fund’s broader investment category for their oversight responsibilities, calculated based on the fund assets they oversee taken as a percentage of the total assets they oversee. This amount does not include compensation of other personnel involved in research, trading, administration, systems, compliance, or fund operations; nor does it include non-compensation costs. These percentages are determine d as of the fund’s fiscal period-end. For personnel who joined Putnam Management during or after 2006, the calculation reflects annualized 2006 compensation or an estimate of 2007 compensation, as applicable.
Other Putnam funds managed by the Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members
Paul Drury is the Portfolio Leader, and Brad Libby, Susan McCormack, and Thalia Meehan are Portfolio Members, of Putnam High Yield Municipal Trust, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, and Putnam Tax-Free Health Care Fund.
Thalia Meehan is the Portfolio Leader, and Paul Drury, Brad Libby, and Susan McCormack are Portfolio Members, of Putnam’s open-end tax-exempt funds for the following states: Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The same group also manages Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund, Putnam California Investment Grade Municipal Trust, Putnam Investment Grade Municipal Trust, Putnam Municipal Bond Fund, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, Putnam New York Investment Grade Municipal Trust, and Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund.
Paul Drury, Brad Libby, Susan McCormack, and Thalia Meehan may also manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by Putnam Management or an affiliate.
Changes in your fund’s Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members
During the year ended January 31, 2007, Portfolio Member Paul Drury became Portfolio Leader, and Brad Libby and Thalia Meehan became Portfolio Members, of your fund. Also during the period, Portfolio Leader David Hamlin and Portfolio Member James St. John left your fund’s management team.
21
Putnam fund ownership by Putnam’s Executive Board
The table below shows how much the members of Putnam’s Executive Board have invested in all Putnam mutual funds (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of January 31, 2007, and January 31, 2006.
| | $1 – | $10,001 – | $50,001 – | $100,001 – | $500,001 – | $1,000,001 |
| Year | $0 | $10,000 | $50,000 | $100,000 | $500,000 | $1,000,000 | and over |
|
Philippe Bibi | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Chief Technology Officer | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Joshua Brooks | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Deputy Head of Investments | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
William Connolly | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Head of Retail Management | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Kevin Cronin | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Head of Investments | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Charles Haldeman, Jr. | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
President and CEO | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Amrit Kanwal | 2007 | | | | | • | |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer | 2006 | | | | | • | |
|
Steven Krichmar | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Chief of Operations | 2006 | | | | | • | |
|
Francis McNamara, III | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
General Counsel | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Jeffrey Peters | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Head of International Business | N/A | | | | | |
|
Richard Robie, III | 2007 | | | | | • | |
|
|
Chief Administrative Officer | 2006 | | | | | • | |
|
Edward Shadek | 2007 | | | | | | • |
|
|
Deputy Head of Investments | 2006 | | | | | | • |
|
Sandra Whiston | 2007 | | | | | • | |
|
|
Head of Institutional Management | 2006 | | | | | • | |
|
N/A indicates the individual was not a member of Putnam’s Executive Board as of 1/31/06.
22
Terms and definitions
Important terms
Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.
Net asset value (NAV) is the price, or value, of one share of a mutual fund, without a sales charge. NAVs fluctuate with market conditions. NAV is calculated by dividing the net assets of each class of shares by the number of outstanding shares in the class.
Public offering price (POP) is the price of a mutual fund share plus the maximum sales charge levied at the time of purchase. POP performance figures shown here assume the 3.75% maximum sales charge for class A shares and 3.25% for class M shares.
Contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) is generally a charge applied at the time of the redemption of class B or C shares and assumes redemption at the end of the period. Your fund’s class B CDSC declines from a 5% maximum during the first year to 1% during the sixth year. After the sixth year, the CDSC no longer applies. The CDSC for class C shares is 1% for one year after purchase.
Share classes
Class A shares are generally subject to an initial sales charge and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).
Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.
Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.
Class M shares have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC.
23
Comparative indexes
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.
Lehman GNMA Index is an unmanaged index of Government National Mortgage Association bonds.
Lehman Intermediate Treasury Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities between 1 and 10 years.
Lehman Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of long-term fixed-rate investment-grade tax-exempt bonds.
Russell 2000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index of those companies in the small-cap Russell 2000 Index chosen for their growth orientation.
S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.
Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Lipper is a third-party industry-ranking entity that ranks mutual funds. Its rankings do not reflect sales charges. Lipper rankings are based on total return at net asset value relative to other funds that have similar current investment styles or objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper may change a fund’s category assignment at its discretion. Lipper category averages reflect performance trends for funds within a category.
24
Trustee approval of
management contract
General conclusions
The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to approve the continuance of your fund’s management contract with Putnam Management. In this regard, the Board of Trustees, with the assistance of its Contract Committee consisting solely of Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Putnam funds (the “Independent Trustees”), requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary under the circumstances. Over the course of several months ending in June 2006, the Contract Committee met four times to consider the information provided by Putnam Management and other information developed with the assistance of the Board’s independent counsel and independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key aspects of this informat ion with all of the Independent Trustees. Upon completion of this review, the Contract Committee recommended, and the Independent Trustees approved, the continuance of your fund’s management contract, effective July 1, 2006.
This approval was based on the following conclusions:
• That the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing such services, and
• That such fee schedule represented an appropriate sharing between fund shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.
These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and were not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered these factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for your fund and the other Putnam funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements in prior years.
25
Management fee schedules and categories; total expenses
The Trustees reviewed the management fee schedules in effect for all Putnam funds, including fee levels and breakpoints, and the assignment of funds to particular fee categories. In reviewing fees and expenses, the Trustees generally focused their attention on material changes in circumstances — for example, changes in a fund’s size or investment style, changes in Putnam Management’s operating costs, or changes in competitive practices in the mutual fund industry — that suggest that consideration of fee changes might be warranted. The Trustees concluded that the circumstances did not warrant changes to the management fee structure of your fund, which had been carefully developed over the years, re-examined on many occasions and adjusted where appropriate. The Trustees focused on two areas of particular interest, as discussed further below:
• Competitiveness. The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds, which indicated that, in a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc., your fund ranked in the 53rd percentile in management fees and in the 24th percentile in total expenses (less any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2005 (the first percentile being the least expensive funds and the 100th percentile being the most expensive funds). (Because the fund’s custom peer group is smaller than the fund’s broad Lipper Inc. peer group, this expense information may differ from the Lipper peer expense information found elsewhere in this report.) The Trustees noted that expense ratios for a number of Putnam funds, which show the percentage of fund assets used to pay for managem ent and administrative services, distribution (12b-1) fees and other expenses, had been increasing recently as a result of declining net assets and the natural operation of fee breakpoints.
The Trustees noted that the expense ratio increases described above were currently being controlled by expense limitations implemented in January 2004 and which Putnam Management, in consultation with the Contract Committees, has committed to maintain at least through 2007. These expense limitations give effect to a commitment by Putnam Management that the expense ratio of each open-end fund would be no higher than the average expense ratio of the competitive funds included in the fund’s relevant Lipper universe (exclusive of any applicable 12b-1 charges in each case). The Trustees observed that this commitment to limit fund expenses has served shareholders well since its inception. In order to ensure that the expenses of the Putnam funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards, the Trustees requested, and Putnam Management agreed, to implement an additional expense limitation for certain funds for the twelve months beginnin g January 1, 2007 equal to the average expense ratio (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) of a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper based on the size of the fund. This additional expense limitation will be applied to those open-end funds that had above-average expense ratios (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) based on the Lipper custom peer group data for the period ended December 31, 2005. This additional expense limitation will not be applied to your fund.
26
• Economies of scale. Your fund currently has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale, which means that the effective management fee rate of a fund (as a percentage of fund assets) declines as a fund grows in size and crosses specified asset thresholds. Conversely, as a fund shrinks in size — as has been the case for many Putnam funds in recent years — these breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. In recent years, the Trustees have examined the operation of the existing breakpoint structure during periods of both growth and decline in asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee schedules in effect for the funds represented an appropriate sharing of economies of scale at current asset levels. In reaching this conclu sion, the Trustees considered the Contract Committee’s stated intent to continue to work with Putnam Management to plan for an eventual resumption in the growth of assets, including a study of potential economies that might be produced under various growth assumptions.
In connection with their review of the management fees and total expenses of the Putnam funds, the Trustees also reviewed the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by Putnam Management and its affiliates from the relationship with the funds. This information included trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability with respect to the funds’ management contracts, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis. Because many of the costs incurred by Putnam Management in managing the funds are not readily identifiable to particular funds, the Trustees observed that the methodology for allocating costs is an important factor in evaluating Putnam Management’s costs and profitabil ity, both as to the Putnam funds in the aggregate and as to individual funds. The Trustees reviewed Putnam Management’s cost allocation methodology with the assistance of independent consultants and concluded that this methodology was reasonable and well-considered.
Investment performance
The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management represented a major factor in the Trustees’ evaluation of the quality of services provided by Putnam Management under your fund’s management contract. The Trustees were assisted in their review of the Putnam funds’ investment process and performance by the work of the Investment Process Committee of the Trustees and the Investment Oversight Committee of the Trustees, which meet on a regular monthly basis with the funds’ portfolio teams throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment process — as measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognize that this does not gua rantee favorable investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods
27
and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds.
The Trustees noted the satisfactory investment performance of many Putnam funds. They also noted the disappointing investment performance of certain funds in recent years and discussed with senior management of Putnam Management the factors contributing to such underperformance and actions being taken to improve performance. The Trustees recognized that, in recent years, Putnam Management has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes and in the fund product line to address areas of underperformance. In particular, they noted the important contributions of Putnam Management’s leadership in attracting, retaining and supporting high-quality investment professionals and in systematically implementing an investment process that seeks to merge the best features of fundamental and quantitative analysis. The Trustees indicated their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the effectiveness of t hese changes and to evaluate whether additional changes to address areas of underperformance are warranted.
In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that your fund’s class A share cumulative total return performance at net asset value was in the following percentiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper High-Yield Municipal Debt Funds) (compared using tax-adjusted performance to recognize the different federal income tax treatment for capital gains distributions and exempt-interest distributions) for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2006 (the first percentile being the best performing funds and the 100th percentile being the worst performing funds):
One-year period | Three-year period | Five-year period |
|
54th | 36th | 62nd |
(Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods shown elsewhere in this report. Over the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2006, there were 82, 78, and 71 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group.* Past performance is no guarantee of future performance.)
As a general matter, the Trustees concluded that cooperative efforts between the Trustees and Putnam Management represent the most effective way to address investment performance problems. The Trustees noted that investors in the Putnam funds have, in effect, placed their trust in the Putnam organization, under the oversight of the funds’ Trustees, to make appropriate decisions regarding the management of the funds. Based on the responsiveness of Putnam Management in the recent past to Trustee concerns about investment performance, the Trustees concluded that it is preferable to seek change within Putnam Management to address performance shortcomings. In the Trustees’ view, the alternative of terminating a
* The percentile rankings for your fund’s class A share annualized total return performance in the Lipper High-Yield Municipal Debt Funds category for the one-, five-, and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2006 were 69%, 75%, and 70%, respectively. Over the one-, five-, and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2006, the fund ranked 54th out of 78, 50th out of 66, and 27th out of 38 funds, respectively. Unlike the information above, these rankings reflect performance before taxes. Note that this more recent information was not available when the Trustees approved the continuance of your fund’s management contract.
28
management contract and engaging a new investment adviser for an underperforming fund would entail significant disruptions and would not provide any greater assurance of improved investment performance.
Brokerage and soft-dollar allocations; other benefits
The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under the management contract with your fund. These include benefits related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research services that may be useful to Putnam Management in managing the assets of the fund and of other clients. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with the allocation of fund brokerage to ensure that the principle of seeking “best price and execution” remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
The Trustees’ annual review of your fund’s management contract also included the review of its distributor’s contract and distribution plan with Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership and the custodian agreement and investor servicing agreement with Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company, all of which provide benefits to affiliates of Putnam Management.
Comparison of retail and institutional fee schedules
The information examined by the Trustees as part of their annual contract review has included for many years information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit pension plans, college endowments, etc. This information included comparison of such fees with fees charged to the funds, as well as a detailed assessment of the differences in the services provided to these two types of clients. The Trustees observed, in this regard, that the differences in fee rates between institutional clients and the funds are by no means uniform when examined by individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of investment management services to these types of clients reflect to a substantial degree historical competitive forces operating in separate market places. The Trustees considered the fact that fee rates across all asset sectors are higher on average for funds than for institutional clients, as well as the differences between the services that Putnam Management provides to the Putnam funds and those that it provides to institutional clients of the firm, but did not rely on such comparisons to any significant extent in concluding that the management fees paid by your fund are reasonable.
29
Other information
for shareholders
Important notice regarding delivery of shareholder documents
In accordance with SEC regulations, Putnam sends a single copy of annual and semiannual shareholder reports, prospectuses, and proxy statements to Putnam shareholders who share the same address, unless a shareholder requests otherwise. If you prefer to receive your own copy of these documents, please call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581, and Putnam will begin sending individual copies within 30 days.
Proxy voting
Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests of our shareholders. The Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2006, are available on the Putnam Individual Investor Web site, www.putnam.com/individual, and on the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC’s Web site, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by calling Putnam’s Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund portfolio holdings
The fund will file a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC’s Web site or the operation of the Public Reference Room.
30
Financial statements
A guide to financial statements
These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes, constitute the fund’s financial statements.
The fund’s portfolio lists all the fund’s investments and their values as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of concentration and diversification.
Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and noninvestment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets includes the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)
Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings — from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal period.
Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund’s net assets were affected by the fund’s net investment gain or loss, by distributions to shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund’s shares. It lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the one in which they were earned. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. Actual results may vary. Any non-taxable return of capital cannot be determined until final tax calculations are completed after the end of the fund’s fiscal year.
Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund’s investment results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting the five most recent reporting periods. In a semiannual report, the highlight table also includes the current reporting period.
31
The fund’s portfolio 1/31/07 (Unaudited)
Key to abbreviations | |
AMBAC AMBAC Indemnity Corporation | FRN Floating Rate Notes |
CIFG CIFG Assurance North America, Inc. | FSA Financial Security Assurance |
COP Certificate of Participation | GNMA Coll. Government National Mortgage |
FGIC Financial Guaranty Insurance Company | Association Collateralized |
FHA Insd. Federal Housing Administration Insured | G.O. Bonds General Obligation Bonds |
FHLMC Coll. Federal Home Loan Mortgage | MBIA MBIA Insurance Company |
Corporation Collateralized | PSFG Permanent School Fund Guaranteed |
FNMA Coll. Federal National Mortgage | Q-SBLF Qualified School Board Loan Fund |
Association Collateralized | U.S. Govt. Coll. U.S. Government Collateralized |
FRB Floating Rate Bonds | VRDN Variable Rate Demand Notes |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* | | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Alabama (1.1%) | | | | | |
AL Hsg. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Single Fam. | | | | | |
Mtge.), Ser. F, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FHLMC Coll., 5 1/2s, 10/1/37 | Aaa | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 3,158,370 |
Jackson Cnty., Hlth. Care Auth. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
5.7s, 5/1/19 | BB+ | | 9,170,000 | | 9,194,759 |
Phenix City, Indl. Dev. Board Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Mead Coated Board), Ser. A, 5.3s, 4/1/27 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | AAA | | 1,000,000 | | 1,035,900 |
Sylacauga, Hlth. Care Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Coosa Valley Med. Ctr.), Ser. A | | | | | |
6s, 8/1/35 | B/P | | 500,000 | | 518,075 |
6s, 8/1/25 | B/P | | 1,700,000 | | 1,773,406 |
| | | | | 15,680,510 |
|
|
Arizona (1.8%) | | | | | |
AZ Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Bethesda Foundation), Ser. A, 6.4s, 8/15/27 | BB–/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,511,400 |
Casa Grande, Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Casa Grande Regl. Med. Ctr.), Ser. A | | | | | |
7 5/8s, 12/1/29 | B+/P | | 7,300,000 | | 8,089,349 |
7 1/4s, 12/1/19 | B+/P | | 500,000 | | 544,990 |
Cochise Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Sierra Vista Regl. Hlth. Ctr.), 7 3/4s, 12/1/30 | BB+/P | | 3,240,000 | | 3,562,769 |
(Sierra Vista Cmnty. Hosp.), 6.45s, 12/1/17 | BB+/P | | 2,395,000 | | 2,600,683 |
(Sierra Vista Regl. Hlth. Ctr.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6.2s, 12/1/21 | BB+/P | | 960,000 | | 1,025,117 |
Marana, Impt. Dist. Special Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
(Tangerine Farms Road), 4.6s, 1/1/26 | Baa1 | | 2,825,000 | | 2,775,845 |
32
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Arizona continued | | | | | |
Navajo Cnty., Indl. Dev. Rev. Bonds (Stone | | | | | |
Container Corp.), 7.2s, 6/1/27 | B/P | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,564,125 |
Pima Cnty., Indl Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Horizon Cmnty. Learning Ctr.), 5.05s, 6/1/25 | BBB– | | 2,450,000 | | 2,395,414 |
Queen Creek, Special Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
(Dist. No. 1) | | | | | |
5s, 1/1/20 | Baa2 | | 500,000 | | 513,425 |
5s, 1/1/19 | Baa2 | | 500,000 | | 514,640 |
5s, 1/1/26 | Baa2 | | 625,000 | | 638,313 |
| | | | | 26,736,070 |
|
|
Arkansas (1.3%) | | | | | |
AR State Hosp. Dev. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Washington Regl. Med. Ctr.), 7 3/8s, | | | | | |
2/1/29 (Prerefunded) | Baa2 | | 10,500,000 | | 11,535,510 |
Independence Cnty., Poll. Control Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Entergy AR, Inc.), 5s, 1/1/21 | A– | | 1,500,000 | | 1,535,745 |
Jefferson Cnty., Poll. Control Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Entergy AR, Inc.), 4.6s, 10/1/17 | A– | | 1,405,000 | | 1,417,617 |
Springdale, Sales & Use Tax Rev. Bonds, FSA, | | | | | |
4 1/8s, 7/1/25 | AAA | | 2,500,000 | | 2,482,425 |
Washington Cnty., Hosp. Rev. Bonds (Regl. | | | | | |
Med. Ctr.), Ser. B, 5s, 2/1/25 | Baa2 | | 1,750,000 | | 1,797,530 |
| | | | | 18,768,827 |
|
|
California (11.4%) | | | | | |
ABAG Fin. Auth. COP (American Baptist | | | | | |
Homes), Ser. A, 5.85s, 10/1/27 | BBB– | | 3,000,000 | | 3,069,180 |
Azusa, Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special Tax Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 05-1) | | | | | |
5s, 9/1/37 | BB–/P | | 1,390,000 | | 1,395,616 |
Ser. 05-1, Class 1, 4.8s, 9/1/19 | BB–/P | | 1,005,000 | | 1,001,211 |
CA Hlth. Fac. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(CA-NV Methodist), 5s, 7/1/26 | A+ | | 1,000,000 | | 1,047,340 |
(Stanford Hosp. & Clinics), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5s, 11/15/23 | A2 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,233,500 |
CA State G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
5.1s, 2/1/34 | A+ | | 2,000,000 | | 2,039,340 |
5s, 5/1/23 | A1 | | 24,265,000 | | 25,569,001 |
CA State Dept. of Wtr. Resources Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 5/1/11 | A1 | | 7,000,000 | | 7,469,910 |
CA State Econ. Recvy. G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
5s, 7/1/17 | AA+ | | 3,650,000 | | 3,829,033 |
CA Statewide Cmnty. Dev. Auth. Special Tax | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Citrus Garden Apt. Project — D1), | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 7/1/22 # | A | | 1,000,000 | | 1,035,350 |
CA Statewide Cmntys., Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Huntington Memorial Hosp.), 5s, 7/1/21 | A+ | | 3,210,000 | | 3,373,903 |
33
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
California continued | | | | | |
Cathedral City, Impt. Board Act of 1915 | | | | | |
Special Assmt. Bonds (Cove Impt. Dist.), | | | | | |
Ser. 04-02 | | | | | |
5.05s, 9/2/35 | BB+/P | $ | 1,830,000 | $ | 1,852,930 |
5s, 9/2/30 | BB+/P | | 1,730,000 | | 1,749,411 |
4 3/4s, 9/2/18 | BB+/P | | 485,000 | | 486,727 |
Chula Vista, Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special Tax Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 08-1 Otay Ranch Village Six), | | | | | |
6s, 9/1/33 | BB/P | | 2,855,000 | | 2,967,915 |
(No. 07-I Otay Ranch Village Eleven), | | | | | |
5.1s, 9/1/26 | BB | | 375,000 | | 381,521 |
(No. 07-1 Otay Ranch Village Eleven), | | | | | |
5.8s, 9/1/28 | BB/P | | 2,000,000 | | 2,111,360 |
Corona, COP (Vista Hosp. Syst.), zero %, | | | | | |
7/1/29 (In default) (F) † | D/P | | 31,900,000 | | 350,900 |
Elk Grove CA Special Tax Bonds (Cmnty. | | | | | |
Fac. Poppy Ridge No. 03-01), 6s, 9/1/34 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | BB/P | | 3,000,000 | | 3,136,440 |
Folsom, Special Tax Rev. Bonds (Cmnty. | | | | | |
Facs. Dist. No. 10), 5 7/8s, 9/1/28 | BB/P | | 1,750,000 | | 1,811,828 |
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(CA Toll Roads), 5 3/4s, 1/15/40 | Baa3 | | 300,000 | | 311,175 |
Gilroy, Rev. Bonds (Bonfante Gardens Park), | | | | | |
8s, 11/1/25 | B/P | | 4,218,000 | | 3,820,875 |
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5s, 6/1/45 | A2 | | 3,250,000 | | 3,350,165 |
Ser. 03 A-1, 5s, 6/1/21 | BBB | | 1,635,000 | | 1,639,284 |
Irvine, Impt. Board Act of 1915 Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 00-18 Group 3), 5.55s, 9/2/26 | BBB–/P | | 995,000 | | 1,025,158 |
(No. 03-19 Group 4), 5s, 9/2/29 | BB+/P | | 705,000 | | 710,844 |
Jurupa, Cmnty. Svcs. Dist. Special Tax | | | | | |
(Dist. No. 19 Eastvale), 5s, 9/1/27 | BB/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,002,300 |
Lammersville, School Dist. Cmnty. Fac. | | | | | |
Special Tax (No. 2002 Mountain House), | | | | | |
5s, 9/1/26 | BB/P | | 750,000 | | 759,083 |
North Natomas, Cmnty. Fac. Special Tax | | | | | |
Bonds (Dist. No. 4), Ser. D, 5s, 9/1/33 | BBB–/P | | 150,000 | | 151,667 |
North Natomas, Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Tax Bonds, Ser. D, 5s, 9/1/26 | BBB–/P | | 1,100,000 | | 1,117,534 |
Northstar, Cmnty. Svcs. Dist. Special Tax | | | | | |
Bonds (Cmnty. Fac. Dist. No. 1), 5s, 9/1/26 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 1,999,920 |
Oakley, Pub. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
6s, 9/2/34 | BB–/P | | 2,395,000 | | 2,443,858 |
5 7/8s, 9/2/24 | BB–/P | | 1,370,000 | | 1,397,797 |
34
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
California continued | | | | | |
Orange Cnty., Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Tax Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 03-1 Ladera Ranch), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5.4s, 8/15/21 | BBB/P | $ | 1,240,000 | $ | 1,284,057 |
(No. 02-1 Ladera Ranch), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5.55s, 8/15/33 | BBB/P | | 2,875,000 | | 2,943,540 |
(No. 03-1 Ladera Ranch), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5.4s, 8/15/22 | BBB/P | | 1,520,000 | | 1,573,747 |
Orange Cnty., Local Trans. Auth. Sales Tax | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, 6.2s, 2/14/11 | AA+ | | 11,200,000 | | 12,025,328 |
Poway, Unified School Dist. Cmnty. Facs. | | | | | |
Special Tax Bonds (Cmnty. Fac. Dist. | | | | | |
No. 14-Del Sur), 5 1/8s, 9/1/26 | BB–/P | | 2,200,000 | | 2,228,996 |
Rancho Mirage, JT Powers Fin. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Eisenhower Med. Ctr.), 5 7/8s, 7/1/26 | A3 | | 1,700,000 | | 1,885,249 |
Roseville, Cmnty. Fac. Special Tax Bonds | | | | | |
(Dist. No. 1 — Crocker), 6s, 9/1/33 | BB/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,573,590 |
(Dist. No. 1 — Westpark), 5 1/4s, 9/1/19 | BB/P | | 205,000 | | 211,181 |
(Dist. No. 1 — Westpark), 5 1/4s, 9/1/18 | BB/P | | 125,000 | | 128,773 |
(Dist. No. 1 — Westpark), 5 1/4s, 9/1/25 | BB/P | | 3,810,000 | | 3,896,944 |
(Dist. No. 1 — Fiddyment), 5s, 9/1/23 | BB/P | | 1,065,000 | | 1,072,338 |
(Dist. No. 1 — Fiddyment), 5s, 9/1/22 | BB/P | | 1,035,000 | | 1,042,856 |
Sacramento, Special Tax Bonds (North | | | | | |
Natomas Cmnty. Fac.), | | | | | |
Ser. 97-01 5.1s, 9/1/35 | BB/P | | 1,525,000 | | 1,544,047 |
Ser. 97-01 5s, 9/1/29 | BB/P | | 1,370,000 | | 1,384,577 |
Ser 97-01 5s, 9/1/21 | BB/P | | 1,325,000 | | 1,347,499 |
Ser. 01-03, 6s, 9/1/28 | BBB/P | | 700,000 | | 738,591 |
San Diego, Assn. of Bay Area Governments | | | | | |
Fin. Auth. For Nonprofit Corps. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(San Diego Hosp.), Ser. A, 6 1/8s, 8/15/20 | Baa1 | | 1,100,000 | | 1,188,363 |
San Francisco City & Cnty. Redev. Agcy. Cmnty. | | | | | |
Fac. Dist. Dist. Special Tax (No. 6 Mission Bay | | | | | |
South), Ser. A, 5.15s, 8/1/35 | BB–/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,519,545 |
San Joaquin Hills, Trans. Corridor Agcy. Toll Rd. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 1/15/28 | Ba2 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,506,240 |
Santaluz, Cmnty. Facs. Dist. No. 2 Special | | | | | |
Tax Rev. Bonds (Impt. Area No. 1), | | | | | |
Ser. B, 6 3/8s, 9/1/30 | BBB/P | | 6,720,000 | | 6,777,994 |
Southern CA Pub. Pwr. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Transmission), 6s, 7/1/12 | Aa3 | | 700,000 | | 700,679 |
Sunnyvale, Special Tax Rev. Bonds (Cmnty. | | | | | |
Fac. Dist. No. 1), 7 3/4s, 8/1/32 | BB–/P | | 6,780,000 | | 7,464,238 |
Thousand Oaks, Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special Tax | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Marketplace 94-1), zero %, 9/1/14 | B/P | | 8,745,000 | | 5,167,158 |
Vallejo, COP (Marine World Foundation) | | | | | |
7.2s, 2/1/26 | BBB–/P | | 9,500,000 | | 9,772,745 |
7s, 2/1/17 | BBB–/P | | 6,840,000 | | 7,036,376 |
| | | | | 165,656,727 |
35
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Colorado (0.9%) | | | | | |
CO Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Evangelical Lutheran), 5.9s, 10/1/27 | A3 | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 5,405,350 |
(Christian Living Cmntys.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 1/1/26 | BB–/P | | 550,000 | | 576,846 |
(Evangelical Lutheran), 5 1/4s, 6/1/21 | A3 | | 220,000 | | 233,814 |
(Evangelical Lutheran), 5 1/4s, 6/1/19 | A3 | | 280,000 | | 298,463 |
(Evangelical Lutheran), 5 1/4s, 6/1/17 | A3 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,607,220 |
CO Springs, Hosp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
6 3/8s, 12/15/30 | A3 | | 755,000 | | 822,731 |
6 3/8s, 12/15/30 (Prerefunded) | A3 | | 745,000 | | 818,278 |
Larimer Cnty., G.O. Bonds (Poudre Impt. — | | | | | |
School Dist. No. 1), 7s, 12/15/16 | Aa3 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,705,150 |
| | | | | 13,467,852 |
|
|
Connecticut (1.0%) | | | | | |
CT State Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(East Hills Woods), Ser. A, 7 3/4s, 11/1/17 | B–/P | | 4,559,021 | | 4,535,907 |
(Elm Park Baptist), 5s, 12/1/13 | BBB+ | | 1,000,000 | | 1,019,610 |
(East Hills Woods), Ser. B, zero %, 3/1/21 | B–/P | | 604,924 | | 33,319 |
CT State Dev. Auth. 1st. Mtg. Gross Rev. | | | | | |
Hlth. Care Rev. Bonds (Elim Street Park | | | | | |
Baptist, Inc.), 5.85s, 12/1/33 | BBB+ | | 2,000,000 | | 2,122,900 |
CT State Dev. Auth. Poll. Control Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Western MA), Ser. A, 5.85s, 9/1/28 | Baa2 | | 7,000,000 | | 7,330,400 |
| | | | | 15,042,136 |
|
|
Delaware (0.3%) | | | | | |
DE St. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Beebe | | | | | |
Med. Ctr.), Ser. A, 5s, 6/1/24 | Baa1 | | 900,000 | | 930,258 |
GMAC Muni. Mtge. Trust 144A sub. notes, | | | | | |
Ser. A1-3, 5.3s, 10/31/39 | A3 | | 3,500,000 | | 3,678,710 |
New Castle Cnty., Rev. Bonds (Newark | | | | | |
Charter School, Inc.), 5s, 9/1/36 | BBB– | | 600,000 | | 608,640 |
| | | | | 5,217,608 |
|
|
District of Columbia (0.8%) | | | | | |
DC G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, FSA, 5s, 6/1/25 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,271,000 |
DC Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 5/15/24 | BBB | | 5,690,000 | | 6,074,360 |
| | | | | 11,345,360 |
|
|
Florida (8.1%) | | | | | |
Aberdeen Cmnty., Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 4,700,000 | | 4,786,574 |
Ser. 1, 5 1/4s, 11/1/15 | BB–/P | | 1,485,000 | | 1,470,640 |
Brevard Cnty., Hlth. Care Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Health First, Inc.) | | | | | |
5s, 4/1/24 | A2 | | 2,500,000 | | 2,608,075 |
5s, 4/1/16 | A2 | | 1,025,000 | | 1,078,772 |
36
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Florida continued | | | | | |
CFM Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, 6 1/4s, 5/1/35 | BB–/P | $ | 3,900,000 | $ | 4,176,042 |
Ser. B, 5 7/8s, 5/1/14 | BB–/P | | 500,000 | | 511,295 |
Clearwater Cay, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds, Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 4,300,000 | | 4,350,826 |
Connerton West, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. B, 5 1/8s, 5/1/16 | BB–/P | | 1,255,000 | | 1,259,029 |
Escambia Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Baptist Hosp. & Baptist Manor), | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 10/1/19 | Baa1 | | 1,650,000 | | 1,680,971 |
Fishhawk, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. II Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. B | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 11/1/09 | BB/P | | 1,450,000 | | 1,448,710 |
5s, 11/1/07 | BB/P | | 50,000 | | 50,028 |
FL Hsg. Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds, Ser. G, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 1/1/37 | Aa1 | | 3,250,000 | | 3,483,578 |
Halifax, Hosp. Med. Ctr. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, U.S. Govt. Coll., 7 1/4s, 10/1/29 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | AAA/F | | 1,000,000 | | 1,132,240 |
Heritage Harbour Marketplace Cmnty., Dev. | | | | | |
Dist. Special Assmt., 5.6s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 2,600,000 | | 2,654,782 |
Heritage Isle at Viera, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. | | | | | |
Special Assmt. Bonds, 5s, 11/1/13 | BB/P | | 2,865,000 | | 2,837,525 |
Highlands Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Adventist Sunbelt), Ser. A, 6s, 11/15/31 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | A2 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,309,360 |
Islands at Doral III, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds, Ser. 04-A, 5.9s, 5/1/35 | BB/P | | 4,035,000 | | 4,181,309 |
Lee Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Hlth. Care Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Shell Point Village), Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 11/15/29 | BBB– | | 4,350,000 | | 4,461,534 |
(Shell Pt./Alliance Oblig. Group), | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 11/15/36 | BBB– | | 625,000 | | 636,263 |
Miami Beach, Hlth. Fac. Auth. Hosp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Mount Sinai Med. Ctr.), Ser. A, 6.7s, 11/15/19 | Ba1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,196,020 |
Middle Village Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special Assmt., | | | | | |
Ser. A, 6s, 5/1/35 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 2,091,720 |
Myrtle Creek, Impt. Dist. Special Assmt. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, 5.2s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 2,245,000 | | 2,224,526 |
North Springs, Impt. Dist. Special Assmt. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Parkland Golf Country Club), | | | | | |
Ser. A-1, 5.45s, 5/1/26 | BB–/P | | 1,950,000 | | 1,975,643 |
Old Palm, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special Assmt. | | | | | |
Bonds (Palm Beach Gardens), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5.9s, 5/1/35 | BB/P | | 990,000 | | 1,032,125 |
Orange Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Orlando Regl. Hlth. Care), U.S. Govt. | | | | | |
Coll., 5 3/4s, 12/1/32 (Prerefunded) | A2 | | 2,700,000 | | 2,969,568 |
(Adventist Hlth. Syst.), 5 5/8s, 11/15/32 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | A+ | | 3,750,000 | | 4,117,613 |
37
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Florida continued | | | | | |
Palm Coast Pk. Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds, 5.7s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | $ | 2,700,000 | $ | 2,749,275 |
Reunion West, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds, 6 1/4s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 5,210,000 | | 5,486,443 |
Riverwood Estates, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. | | | | | |
Special Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5.35s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 973,760 |
Ser. B, 5s, 5/1/13 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 1,982,020 |
South Bay, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. B-2, 5 3/8s, 5/1/13 | BB–/P | | 500,000 | | 502,560 |
Ser. B-1, 5 1/8s, 11/1/09 | BB–/P | | 1,640,000 | | 1,641,853 |
South Village, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5.7s, 5/1/35 | BB–/P | | 2,960,000 | | 3,040,897 |
Tampa Bay, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special Assmt. | | | | | |
Bonds (New Port), Ser. A, 5 7/8s, 5/1/38 | BB–/P | | 6,100,000 | | 6,276,717 |
Tern Bay, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5 3/8s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 4,600,000 | | 4,655,936 |
Ser. B, 5s, 5/1/15 | BB–/P | | 500,000 | | 497,295 |
Tolomato, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special Assmt. | | | | | |
Bonds, 5.4s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 2,450,000 | | 2,475,750 |
Town Ctr. at Palm Coast Cmnty., Dev. Dist. | | | | | |
Special Assmt., 6s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 1,975,000 | | 2,059,451 |
Turnbull Creek Cmnty., Dev. Dist. | | | | | |
Special Assmt. | | | | | |
5.8s, 5/1/35 | BB–/P | | 1,975,000 | | 2,037,134 |
5 1/4s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,640 |
Verandah, West Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Cap. Impt.), Ser. A, 6 5/8s, 5/1/33 | BBB–/P | | 955,000 | | 1,024,429 |
Verano Ctr. Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds (Cmnty. Infrastructure), | | | | | |
Ser. B, 5s, 11/1/13 | BB–/P | | 3,325,000 | | 3,311,600 |
Ser. A, 5 3/8s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 1,030,000 | | 1,033,780 |
Wentworth Estates, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. | | | | | |
Special Assmt. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5 5/8s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 2,048,120 |
Ser. B, 5 1/8s, 11/1/12 | BB–/P | | 2,470,000 | | 2,465,554 |
West Palm Beach, Cmty. Redev. Agcy. | | | | | |
(Northwood — Pleasant), 5s, 3/1/25 | A | | 980,000 | | 1,017,612 |
Westchester Cmnty. Dev. Dist. No. 1 | | | | | |
Special Assmt. (Cmnty. Infrastructure), | | | | | |
6 1/8s, 5/1/35 | BB–/P | | 2,250,000 | | 2,386,530 |
World Commerce Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt., Ser. A-1 | | | | | |
6 1/2s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 1,950,000 | | 2,082,912 |
6 1/4s, 5/1/22 | BB–/P | | 1,805,000 | | 1,916,856 |
5 1/2s, 5/1/38 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 1,996,840 |
| | | | | 117,388,732 |
38
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Georgia (2.1%) | | | | | |
Atlanta, Wtr. & Waste Wtr. VRDN, Ser. C, | | | | | |
FSA, 3.7s, 11/1/41 | VMIG1 | $ | 5,300,000 | $ | 5,300,000 |
Effingham Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Pacific Corp.), 6 1/2s, 6/1/31 | B2 | | 3,400,000 | | 3,585,266 |
Forsyth Cnty., Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(GA Baptist Hlth. Care Syst.), U.S. Govt. Coll., | | | | | |
6 3/8s, 10/1/28 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 6,000,000 | | 7,381,020 |
Fulton Cnty., Res. Care Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Canterbury Court), Class A, | | | | | |
6 1/8s, 2/15/34 | B+/P | | 800,000 | | 841,088 |
(First Mtge. — Lenbrook), Ser. A, 5s, 7/1/17 | B/P | | 2,740,000 | | 2,724,738 |
Rockdale Cnty., Dev. Auth. Solid Waste Disp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Visay Paper, Inc.) | | | | | |
7 1/2s, 1/1/26 | B+/P | | 8,475,000 | | 8,512,205 |
7.4s, 1/1/16 | B+/P | | 1,525,000 | | 1,531,512 |
| | | | | 29,875,829 |
|
|
Idaho (0.1%) | | | | | |
ID Hsg. & Fin. Assn. Rev. Bonds (Single Fam. | | | | | |
Mtge.), Ser. C-2, FHA Insd., 5.15s, 7/1/29 | Aaa | | 1,285,000 | | 1,296,475 |
|
|
Illinois (2.4%) | | | | | |
Bedford Pk., Village Rev. Bonds (Hotel/Motel | | | | | |
Tax), Ser. A, 4.9s, 12/1/23 | Baa1 | | 3,085,000 | | 3,124,488 |
Chicago, Special Assmt. Bonds (Lake Shore | | | | | |
East), 6 3/4s, 12/1/32 | BB/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,623,435 |
Du Page Cnty., Special Svc. Area No. 31 | | | | | |
Special Tax Bonds (Monarch Landing), | | | | | |
5 5/8s, 3/1/36 | BB–/P | | 900,000 | | 939,915 |
IL Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Landing At | | | | | |
Plymouth Place), Ser. A, 6s, 5/15/25 | B+/P | | 1,550,000 | | 1,637,870 |
IL Fin. Auth. Solid Waste Disposal (Waste | | | | | |
Mgmt., Inc.), Ser. A, 5.05s, 8/1/29 | BBB | | 500,000 | | 512,275 |
IL Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Cmnty. Rehab. Providers Fac.), | | | | | |
8 1/4s, 8/1/12 | CCC/P | | 195,635 | | 177,652 |
(Cmnty. Rehab. Providers Fac.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
7 7/8s, 7/1/20 | CCC/P | | 956,414 | | 875,540 |
(Hindsdale Hosp.), Ser. A, 6.95s, 11/15/13 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 4,420,000 | | 4,928,742 |
(St. Benedict), Ser. 03A-1, 6.9s, 11/15/33 | B+ | | 1,000,000 | | 1,082,190 |
(Elmhurst Memorial Hlth. Care), | | | | | |
5 5/8s, 1/1/28 | A2 | | 6,000,000 | | 6,368,700 |
IL State Toll Hwy. Auth. Rev. Bonds, Ser. A-1, | | | | | |
FSA, 5s, 1/1/23 | Aaa | | 12,000,000 | | 12,787,200 |
| | | | | 34,058,007 |
39
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Indiana (0.9%) | | | | | |
Indianapolis, Arpt. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Federal Express Corp.), 5.1s, 1/15/17 | Baa2 | $ | 12,000,000 | $ | 12,601,320 |
|
|
Iowa (3.0%) | | | | | |
IA Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Single Fam. Mtge.), | | | | | |
Ser. D, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., 5s, 1/1/36 | Aaa | | 3,695,000 | | 3,787,560 |
IA Fin. Auth. Hlth. Care Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Care Initiatives) | | | | | |
9 1/4s, 7/1/25 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 14,160,000 | | 17,339,770 |
9.15s, 7/1/09 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 505,000 | | 542,360 |
Ser. A, 5 1/4s, 7/1/18 | BBB– | | 2,500,000 | | 2,576,600 |
Ser. A, 5 1/4s, 7/1/17 | BBB– | | 3,900,000 | | 4,040,361 |
IA Fin. Auth. Retirement Cmnty. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Friendship Haven), Ser. A, 6s, 11/15/24 | BB/P | | 300,000 | | 306,495 |
IA State Higher Ed. Loan Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Wartburg), Ser. A | | | | | |
5s, 10/1/21 | BBB–/F | | 730,000 | | 750,747 |
5s, 10/1/20 | BBB–/F | | 1,270,000 | | 1,308,303 |
Marion Hlth. Care Fac. Rev. Bonds (First Mtg.), | | | | | |
Ser. IA, 1.76s, 1/1/29 | CCC | | 45,000 | | 46,851 |
Tobacco Settlement Auth. of IA Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. C, 5 3/8s, 6/1/38 | BBB | | 3,000,000 | | 3,127,440 |
Ser. B, zero %, 6/1/34 | BBB | | 9,000,000 | | 9,067,140 |
| | | | | 42,893,627 |
|
|
Kansas (0.3%) | | | | | |
Lenexa, Hlth. Care Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(LakeView Village) | | | | | |
Ser. C, 6 7/8s, 5/15/32 | BB+ | | 2,250,000 | | 2,425,433 |
Ser. B, 6 1/4s, 5/15/26 | BB+ | | 1,200,000 | | 1,227,108 |
| | | | | 3,652,541 |
|
|
Kentucky (0.7%) | | | | | |
KY Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(First Mtg.), Ser. IA, 6 1/2s, 1/1/29 | CCC | | 260,000 | | 270,696 |
KY Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth. Hlth. Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Norton Hlth. Care), Ser. A | | | | | |
6 5/8s, 10/1/28 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 4,915,000 | | 5,436,137 |
6 5/8s, 10/1/28 | A–/F | | 1,365,000 | | 1,479,510 |
6 1/8s, 10/1/10 | A–/F | | 2,130,000 | | 2,206,062 |
6 1/8s, 10/1/10 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 1,165,000 | | 1,211,542 |
| | | | | 10,603,947 |
|
|
Louisiana (1.4%) | | | | | |
De Soto Parish, Env. Impt. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Intl. Paper Co.), Ser. A, 5s, 11/1/18 | BBB | | 3,235,000 | | 3,286,631 |
LA Hlth. Ed. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Lambert House), Ser. A, 6.2s, 1/1/28 | B+/P | | 3,000,000 | | 3,065,970 |
40
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Louisiana continued | | | | | |
LA Local Govt. Env. Fac. Cmnty. Dev. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (St. James Place), Ser. A, | | | | | |
7s, 11/1/20 | B–/P | $ | 8,828,000 | $ | 9,069,358 |
Tangipahoa Parish Hosp. Svcs. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(North Oaks Med. Ctr.), Ser. A, 5s, 2/1/25 | A | | 900,000 | | 925,047 |
W. Feliciana Parish, Poll. Control Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Entergy Gulf States), Ser. B, 6.6s, 9/1/28 | BBB– | | 4,000,000 | | 4,002,640 |
| | | | | 20,349,646 |
|
|
Maine (0.4%) | | | | | |
Rumford, Solid Waste Disp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Boise Cascade Corp.), 6 7/8s, 10/1/26 | Ba3 | | 5,500,000 | | 6,046,095 |
|
|
Maryland (1.8%) | | | | | |
Howard Cnty., Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, U.S. Govt. | | | | | |
Coll., 8s, 5/15/29 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 5,000,000 | | 5,739,950 |
MD State Hlth. & Higher Edl. Fac. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Mercy Ridge), Ser. A, 6s, 4/1/35 | BBB+ | | 2,000,000 | | 2,164,720 |
(Medstar Hlth.), 5 1/2s, 8/15/33 | Baa1 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,584,075 |
(Medstar Hlth.), 5 3/8s, 8/15/24 | Baa1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,122,460 |
(Edenwald), Ser. A, 5.2s, 1/1/24 | BB/P | | 300,000 | | 309,213 |
(Edenwald), Ser. A, 5.2s, 1/1/20 | BB/P | | 350,000 | | 361,550 |
(Edenwald), Ser. A, 5 1/8s, 1/1/19 | BB/P | | 100,000 | | 103,043 |
(King Farm Presbyterian Cmnty.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
4 3/4s, 1/1/13 | B/P | | 4,435,000 | | 4,425,775 |
MD State Indl. Dev. Fin. Auth. Econ. Dev. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Our Lady of Good Counsel | | | | | |
School), Ser. A, 6s, 5/1/35 | B/P | | 600,000 | | 640,476 |
MuniMae Tax Exempt Bond Subsidiary, LLC | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A-2, 4.9s, 6/30/49 | A3 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,024,060 |
Westminster, Econ. Dev. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Carroll Lutheran Village), Ser. A | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 5/1/34 | BB/P | | 3,400,000 | | 3,572,992 |
6s, 5/1/24 | BB/P | | 2,000,000 | | 2,085,520 |
Westminster, Ed Fac. Rev. Bonds (McDaniel | | | | | |
College, Inc.), 5s, 11/1/21 | BBB+ | | 1,000,000 | | 1,042,210 |
| | | | | 26,176,044 |
|
|
Massachusetts (3.8%) | | | | | |
MA State Dev. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Lasell College), 6 3/4s, 7/1/31 | BB+/P | | 5,115,000 | | 5,377,144 |
MA State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Civic Investments/HPHC), Ser. A, | | | | | |
9s, 12/15/15 | BBB–/P | | 7,815,000 | | 9,614,795 |
(Jordan Hosp.), Ser. E, 6 3/4s, 10/1/33 | BBB– | | 6,000,000 | | 6,567,120 |
(Winchester Hosp.), Ser. E, 6 3/4s, 7/1/30 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | BBB/F | | 4,900,000 | | 5,335,463 |
41
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Massachusetts continued | | | | | |
MA State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(UMass Memorial), Ser. C, 6 5/8s, 7/1/32 | Baa2 | $ | 9,750,000 | $ | 10,703,745 |
(Berkshire Hlth. Syst.), Ser. E, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 10/1/31 | BBB+ | | 4,400,000 | | 4,780,732 |
(Hlth. Care Syst. Covenant Hlth.), Ser. E, | | | | | |
6s, 7/1/31 | A | | 7,200,000 | | 7,820,856 |
(Caritas Christi Oblig. Group), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 7/1/08 | BBB | | 2,630,000 | | 2,663,270 |
MA State Indl. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(1st Mtge. Stone Institution & Newton), | | | | | |
7.9s, 1/1/24 | BB–/P | | 750,000 | | 754,935 |
(Sr. Living Fac. Forge Hill), 7s, 4/1/17 | B/P | | 1,580,000 | | 1,617,367 |
| | | | | 55,235,427 |
|
|
Michigan (3.1%) | | | | | |
Ann Arbor, Econ. Dev. Corp. Ltd. Oblig. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Glacier Hills, Inc.), State & Local Govt. | | | | | |
Coll., 8 3/8s, 1/15/19 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 2,299,000 | | 2,881,865 |
Detroit, Swr. Disp. FRN, Ser. D, FSA, | | | | | |
4.191s, 7/1/32 | Aaa | | 3,750,000 | | 3,754,875 |
Dickinson Cnty., Econ. Dev. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 6/1/16 | BBB | | 7,000,000 | | 7,447,020 |
Flint, Hosp. Bldg. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Hurley Med. Ctr.), 6s, 7/1/20 | Ba1 | | 2,350,000 | | 2,473,375 |
Garden City, Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Garden City Hosp. OB Group), Ser. A | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 9/1/17 | Ba1 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,053,040 |
5 5/8s, 9/1/10 | Ba1 | | 1,360,000 | | 1,385,228 |
Kentwood, Economic Dev. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Holland Home), Ser. A, 5s, 11/15/22 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,006,680 |
MI State Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Oakwood Hosp.), Ser. A, 5 3/4s, 4/1/32 | A2 | | 2,500,000 | | 2,652,425 |
Ser. A, 4 3/4s, 4/15/31 | A1 | | 3,000,000 | | 2,999,790 |
MI State Hsg. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
3.9s, 6/1/30 | AA+ | | 4,000,000 | | 3,981,080 |
MI State Strategic Fund Solid Waste Disp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Genesee Pwr. Station), 7 1/2s, 1/1/21 | B/P | | 2,700,000 | | 2,740,743 |
(SD Warren Co.), Ser. C, 7 3/8s, 1/15/22 | BB/P | | 5,000,000 | | 5,078,350 |
Midland Cnty., Econ. Dev. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
6 3/4s, 7/23/09 | B3 | | 3,250,000 | | 3,339,083 |
Whitmore Lake, Pub. School Dist. G.O. Bonds, | | | | | |
FGIC, Q-SBLF, 5s, 5/1/28 | Aaa | | 2,275,000 | | 2,413,434 |
| | | | | 45,206,988 |
42
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Minnesota (1.1%) | | | | | |
Cohasset, Poll. Control Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Allete, Inc.), 4.95s, 7/1/22 | A | $ | 6,605,000 | $ | 6,752,556 |
Inver Grove Heights, Nursing Home Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Presbyterian Homes Care) | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 10/1/41 | B/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,011,120 |
5 3/8s, 10/1/26 | B/P | | 250,000 | | 252,558 |
MN State Higher Ed. Fac. Auth. VRDN | | | | | |
(St. Olaf College), Ser. 5-M2, 3.73s, 10/1/20 | VMIG1 | | 1,825,000 | | 1,825,000 |
MN State Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Res. Hsg.) | | | | | |
Ser. H, 5s, 1/1/36 | Aa1 | | 1,870,000 | | 1,912,337 |
Ser. B, 5s, 7/1/34 | AA+ | | 910,000 | | 932,823 |
Sauk Rapids Hlth. Care & Hsg. Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Good Shepherd Lutheran Home), 6s, 1/1/34 | B+/P | | 800,000 | | 822,216 |
St. Paul, Hsg. & Redev. Auth. Hosp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Healtheast), 6s, 11/15/25 | Baa3 | | 1,250,000 | | 1,374,350 |
St. Paul, Port Auth. Lease Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Regions Hosp. Pkg. Ramp), Ser. 1 | | | | | |
5s, 8/1/36 | BBB–/P | | 275,000 | | 276,238 |
5s, 8/1/21 | BBB–/P | | 475,000 | | 482,206 |
| | | | | 15,641,404 |
|
|
Mississippi (0.9%) | | | | | |
Lowndes Cnty., Solid Waste Disp. & Poll. | | | | | |
Control Rev. Bonds (Weyerhaeuser Co.) | | | | | |
Ser. A, 6.8s, 4/1/22 | Baa2 | | 715,000 | | 868,546 |
Ser. B, 6.7s, 4/1/22 | Baa2 | | 2,500,000 | | 3,010,150 |
MS Bus. Fin. Corp. Poll. Control Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Syst. Energy Resources, Inc.), 5 7/8s, 4/1/22 | BBB– | | 2,000,000 | | 2,014,760 |
MS Home Corp. Rev. Bonds (Single Fam. Mtge.) | | | | | |
Ser. B-2, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
6.45s, 12/1/33 | Aaa | | 4,350,000 | | 4,495,682 |
Ser. B, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 6/1/36 | Aaa | | 1,345,000 | | 1,398,410 |
MS Hosp. Equip. & Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Hosp. South Central), 5 1/4s, 12/1/21 | BBB+ | | 500,000 | | 528,660 |
| | | | | 12,316,208 |
|
|
Missouri (1.8%) | | | | | |
Cape Girardeau Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Hlth. | | | | | |
Care Fac. Rev. Bonds (St. Francis Med. Ctr.), | | | | | |
Ser. A | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 6/1/32 | A+ | | 3,000,000 | | 3,187,020 |
5 1/2s, 6/1/27 | A+ | | 3,250,000 | | 3,448,900 |
Kansas City, Indl. Dev. Auth. Hlth. Fac. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (First Mtg. Bishop Spencer), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 1/1/24 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 2,075,540 |
43
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Missouri continued | | | | | |
MO State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (BJC Hlth. Syst.), 5 1/4s, 5/15/32 | Aa2 | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,613,900 |
MO State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. VRDN | | | | | |
(Cox Hlth. Syst.), AMBAC, 3.74s, 6/1/22 | VMIG1 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,500,000 |
MO State Hsg. Dev. Comm. Mtge. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Single Fam. Mtge.), Ser. D-2, GNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FNMA Coll., 6 1/2s, 9/1/29 | AAA | | 1,450,000 | | 1,468,009 |
(Single Fam.), Ser. E-1, GNMA Coll., FNMA | | | | | |
Coll., 6.45s, 9/1/29 | AAA | | 495,000 | | 516,344 |
(Single Fam. Homeowner Loan), Ser. A-2, | | | | | |
GNMA Coll., 6.3s, 3/1/30 | AAA | | 2,775,000 | | 2,846,456 |
(Single Fam. Home Ownership Loan), Ser. B, | | | | | |
GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., 5.8s, 9/1/35 | AAA | | 5,355,000 | | 5,697,988 |
(Single Fam. Homeowner Loan), Ser. C, | | | | | |
GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., 5.6s, 9/1/35 | AAA | | 955,000 | | 1,006,532 |
(Single Fam. Home Ownership Loan), | | | | | |
Ser. A-1, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
6 3/4s, 3/1/34 | AAA | | 1,130,000 | | 1,183,935 |
| | | | | 25,544,624 |
|
|
Montana (0.4%) | | | | | |
Forsyth, Poll. Control VRDN (Pacific Corp.), | | | | | |
3.74s, 1/1/18 | P–1 | | 3,600,000 | | 3,600,000 |
MT Fac. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Sr. Living | | | | | |
St. Johns Lutheran), Ser. A, 6s, 5/15/25 | B+/P | | 750,000 | | 784,658 |
MT State Board Inv. Exempt Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Still Water Mining Project), 8s, 7/1/20 | B3 | | 750,000 | | 789,840 |
| | | | | 5,174,498 |
|
|
Nebraska (—%) | | | | | |
Kearney, Indl. Dev. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Great Platte River), 8s, 9/1/12 | D/P | | 123,433 | | 92,970 |
(Brookhaven), zero %, 9/1/12 | D/P | | 1,582,934 | | 15,829 |
| | | | | 108,799 |
|
|
Nevada (2.5%) | | | | | |
Clark Cnty., Impt. Dist. Special Assmt.Bonds | | | | | |
(Dist. No. 142), 6 3/8s, 8/1/23 | BB–/P | | 995,000 | | 1,030,253 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/20 | BB/P | | 340,000 | | 345,369 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/19 | BB/P | | 1,150,000 | | 1,170,447 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/18 | BB/P | | 1,115,000 | | 1,137,802 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/17 | BB/P | | 1,320,000 | | 1,349,647 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/25 | BB/P | | 305,000 | | 308,925 |
Clark Cnty., Indl. Dev. Rev. Bonds (Southwest | | | | | |
Gas Corp. Project), Ser. C, 5.45s, 3/1/38 | Baa3 | | 5,350,000 | | 5,571,116 |
Clark Cnty., Local Impt. Dist. Special Assmt. | | | | | |
Bonds (No. 142), 6.1s, 8/1/18 | BB–/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,552,290 |
44
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Nevada continued | | | | | |
Henderson, Local Impt. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. T-14), 5.8s, 3/1/23 | BB/P | $ | 3,970,000 | $ | 4,091,284 |
(No. T-14), 5.55s, 3/1/17 | BB/P | | 2,365,000 | | 2,436,872 |
(No. T-16), 5 1/8s, 3/1/25 | BB–/P | | 500,000 | | 502,210 |
(No. T-18), 5s, 9/1/16 | BB–/P | | 375,000 | | 385,909 |
(No. T-18), 5s, 9/1/15 | BB–/P | | 2,295,000 | | 2,362,634 |
(No. T-18), 5s, 9/1/14 | BB–/P | | 2,330,000 | | 2,399,457 |
(No. T-16), 4.8s, 3/1/15 | BB–/P | | 1,795,000 | | 1,803,293 |
(No. T-16), 5.1s, 3/1/21 | BB–/P | | 1,250,000 | | 1,262,163 |
(No. T-17), 5s, 9/1/25 | BB/P | | 825,000 | | 836,039 |
(No. T-16), 5s, 3/1/20 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,006,500 |
Las Vegas, Local Impt. Board Special Assmt. | | | | | |
(Dist. No. 607), 6s, 6/1/19 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,031,400 |
(Dist. No. 607), 5.9s, 6/1/18 | BB–/P | | 200,000 | | 206,244 |
(Dist. No. 607), 5.9s, 6/1/17 | BB–/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,546,980 |
Las Vegas, Special Impt. Dist. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 809 — Summerlin Area), 5.65s, 6/1/23 | BB/P | | 805,000 | | 833,763 |
Washoe Cnty., Wtr. Fac. Mandatory Put Bonds | | | | | |
(Sierra Pacific Pwr. Co.), 5s, 7/1/09 | Ba1 | | 3,500,000 | | 3,531,570 |
| | | | | 36,702,167 |
|
|
New Hampshire (2.1%) | | | | | |
NH Higher Edl. & Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Riverwoods at Exeter), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/2s, 3/1/23 | BBB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,019,480 |
(Riverwoods at Exeter), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 3/8s, 3/1/13 | BBB–/P | | 235,000 | | 239,331 |
(Rivermead at Peterborough), 5 3/4s, 7/1/28 | BB/P | | 6,000,000 | | 6,082,800 |
NH Hlth. & Ed. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Huntington at Nashua), Ser. A, 6 7/8s, 5/1/33 | BB–/P | | 2,200,000 | | 2,325,598 |
NH State Bus. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Alice Peck Day Hlth. Syst.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
7s, 10/1/29 | BBB–/P | | 3,000,000 | | 3,155,340 |
(Franklin Regl. Hosp. Assn.), Ser. A, 6.05s, | | | | | |
9/1/29 (Prerefunded) | BBB–/P | | 4,180,000 | | 4,355,602 |
(Proctor Academy), Ser. A, 5.6s, 6/1/28 | Baa2 | | 3,550,000 | | 3,617,202 |
NH State Bus. Fin. Auth. Poll. Control Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Pub. Svc. Co.), Ser. D, 6s, 5/1/21 | Baa1 | | 7,000,000 | | 7,286,440 |
NH State Bus. Fin. Auth. Poll. Control & | | | | | |
Solid Waste Rev. Bonds (Crown Paper Co.), | | | | | |
7 3/4s, 1/1/22 (In default) † | D | | 8,551,027 | | 86 |
NH State Hsg. Fin. Auth. Single Family | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Mtge. Acquisition), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5.85s, 1/1/35 | Aa2 | | 2,770,000 | | 2,901,215 |
| | | | | 30,983,094 |
45
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
New Jersey (4.7%) | | | | | |
NJ Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Cedar Crest Village, Inc.), Ser. A, 7s, | | | | | |
11/15/16 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | $ | 900,000 | $ | 950,256 |
(Newark Arpt. Marriot Hotel), 7s, 10/1/14 | Ba1 | | 9,200,000 | | 9,351,524 |
(First Mtge. Presbyterian Home), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 3/8s, 11/1/31 | BB/P | | 500,000 | | 527,005 |
(United Methodist Homes), Ser. A-1, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 7/1/33 | BB+ | | 3,000,000 | | 3,199,170 |
(First Mtge. Presbyterian Home), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 11/1/20 | BB/P | | 500,000 | | 526,475 |
(First Mtge. Lions Gate), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 7/8s, 1/1/37 | B/P | | 800,000 | | 829,192 |
(Cigarette Tax), 5 1/2s, 6/15/24 | Baa2 | | 9,000,000 | | 9,393,480 |
(Seabrook Village), 5 1/4s, 11/15/26 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,019,920 |
NJ Hlth. Care Fac. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Gen. Hosp. Ctr.-Passaic Inc.), FSA, 6 3/4s, | | | | | |
7/1/19 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 6,000,000 | | 7,308,900 |
(South Jersey Hosp.), 6s, 7/1/12 | Baa1 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,388,400 |
NJ State Rev. Bonds (Trans. Syst.), Ser. C, | | | | | |
AMBAC, zero %, 12/15/24 | Aaa | | 19,000,000 | | 8,732,590 |
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
6 3/4s, 6/1/39 (Prerefunded) | BBB | | 2,000,000 | | 2,316,520 |
6 1/4s, 6/1/43 (Prerefunded) | BBB | | 1,535,000 | | 1,735,287 |
6s, 6/1/37 (Prerefunded) | BBB | | 6,260,000 | | 6,895,390 |
Ser. 1A, 4 1/2s, 6/1/23 | BBB | | 9,750,000 | | 9,561,533 |
| | | | | 67,735,642 |
|
|
New Mexico (0.9%) | | | | | |
Farmington, Poll. Control Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Tucson Elec. Pwr. Co. San Juan), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6.95s, 10/1/20 | Baa3 | | 5,500,000 | | 5,700,860 |
(San Juan), Ser. B, 4 7/8s, 4/1/33 | Baa2 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,217,700 |
NM Mtge. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Single | | | | | |
Fam. Mtge.) | | | | | |
Ser. C, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., FHLMC | | | | | |
Coll., 5.85s, 1/1/37 | AAA | | 1,165,000 | | 1,251,000 |
Ser. B-2, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FHLMC Coll., 6.1s, 7/1/29 | AAA | | 925,000 | | 941,077 |
Ser. C, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., FHLMC | | | | | |
Coll., 5.82s, 9/1/33 | AAA | | 1,735,000 | | 1,838,475 |
Ser. D-2, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FHLMC Coll., 5.64s, 9/1/33 | AAA | | 2,310,000 | | 2,371,631 |
| | | | | 13,320,743 |
|
|
New York (5.7%) | | | | | |
Albany, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds (Charitable | | | | | |
Leadership), Ser. A, 5 3/4s, 7/1/26 | Ba2 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,073,480 |
Huntington, Hsg. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Gurwin | | | | | |
Jewish Sr. Residence), Ser. A, 6s, 5/1/39 | B+/P | | 1,250,000 | | 1,278,900 |
46
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
New York continued | | | | | |
Nassau Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(North Shore Hlth. Syst. Project D), | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 11/1/07 | A3 | $ | 1,575,000 | $ | 1,590,923 |
NY City, G.O. Bonds, Ser. C, 5 1/2s, 8/1/13 | AA– | | 8,000,000 | | 8,655,520 |
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Liberty-7 World Trade Ctr.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
6 3/4s, 3/1/15 | B–/P | | 2,300,000 | | 2,471,281 |
(Liberty-7 World Trade Ctr.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 3/1/15 | B–/P | | 3,875,000 | | 4,121,566 |
(Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogen. Partners), | | | | | |
5.65s, 10/1/28 | BBB– | | 3,250,000 | | 3,285,913 |
(Queens Baseball Stadium — Pilot), AMBAC, | | | | | |
5s, 1/1/26 | Aaa | | 2,500,000 | | 2,660,600 |
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Brooklyn Polytech. U. Project J), | | | | | |
6 1/8s, 11/1/30 | BB+ | | 500,000 | | 521,515 |
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Special Fac. FRB | | | | | |
(American Airlines — JFK Intl. Arpt.), | | | | | |
7 5/8s, 8/1/25 | B | | 1,500,000 | | 1,838,535 |
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Special Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(American Airlines — JFK Intl. Arpt.), | | | | | |
7 1/2s, 8/1/16 | B | | 11,990,000 | | 14,237,286 |
(American Airlines — JFK Intl. Arpt.), | | | | | |
7 1/8s, 8/1/11 | B | | 4,500,000 | | 4,801,545 |
(British Airways PLC), 5 1/4s, 12/1/32 | Ba2 | | 2,325,000 | | 2,327,999 |
(Jetblue Airways Corp.), 5s, 5/15/20 | B | | 675,000 | | 669,134 |
NY City, State Dorm. Auth. Lease Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Court Fac.), 6s, 5/15/39 (Prerefunded) | A+ | | 2,800,000 | | 3,017,224 |
NY State Dorm. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(NY U. Hosp. Ctr.), Ser. A, 5s, 7/1/20 | Ba2 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,548,795 |
(Mt. Sinai NYU Hlth.), Ser. C, 5s, 7/1/11 | Baa2 | | 2,360,000 | | 2,387,990 |
NY State Energy Research & Dev. Auth. Gas | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Brooklyn Union Gas), | | | | | |
6.952s, 7/1/26 | A+ | | 1,800,000 | | 1,839,312 |
Oneida Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(St. Elizabeth Med.), Ser. A, 5 7/8s, 12/1/29 | BB+/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,533,960 |
Onondaga Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Solvay Paperboard, LLC), 7s, 11/1/30 | | | | | |
(acquired 12/9/98, cost $8,900,000) ‡ | BB/P | | 8,900,000 | | 9,277,983 |
Port Auth. NY & NJ Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Kennedy Intl. Arpt. — 3rd Installment), | | | | | |
7s, 10/1/07 | BB+/P | | 300,000 | | 300,531 |
(Kennedy Intl. Arpt. — 4th Installment), | | | | | |
6 3/4s, 10/1/11 | BB+/P | | 2,500,000 | | 2,528,475 |
Suffolk Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Peconic Landings), Ser. A, 8s, 10/1/20 | B+/P | | 4,000,000 | | 4,388,080 |
47
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
New York continued | | | | | |
Suffolk Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Southampton Hosp. Assn.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
7 5/8s, 1/1/30 | B–/P | $ | 3,675,000 | $ | 3,934,345 |
(Gurwin Jewish-Phase II), 6.7s, 5/1/39 | B+/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,084,260 |
| | | | | 82,375,152 |
|
|
North Carolina (2.5%) | | | | | |
NC Eastern Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Syst. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. C | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 1/1/17 | Baa2 | | 7,500,000 | | 7,964,400 |
5 3/8s, 1/1/16 | Baa2 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,063,000 |
5.3s, 1/1/15 | Baa2 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,122,520 |
NC Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Homeownership), Ser. 26, Class A, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 1/1/38 | Aa2 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,061,080 |
NC Med. Care Cmnty. Hlth. Care Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(First Mtge. — Presbyterian Homes), | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 10/1/22 | BB/P | | 4,250,000 | | 4,403,553 |
(Pines at Davidson), Ser. A, 5s, 1/1/17 | A–/F | | 980,000 | | 1,038,457 |
(Pines at Davidson), Ser. A, 5s, 1/1/14 | A–/F | | 940,000 | | 993,289 |
(Pines at Davidson), Ser. A, 5s, 1/1/13 | A–/F | | 895,000 | | 943,554 |
(Pines at Davidson), Ser. B, 4.2s, 7/1/10 | A–/F | | 400,000 | | 401,288 |
NC Med. Care Comm. Retirement Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(First Mtge. Givens Estates), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/2s, 7/1/32 | BB–/P | | 4,500,000 | | 4,827,060 |
(First Mtge. United Methodist), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 10/1/32 | BB+/P | | 1,600,000 | | 1,654,976 |
(First Mtge. United Methodist), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 10/1/24 | BB+/P | | 200,000 | | 205,018 |
NC State Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 1, Catawba Elec.), Ser. B, 6 1/2s, 1/1/20 | A3 | | 9,000,000 | | 9,711,810 |
| | | | | 36,390,005 |
|
|
North Dakota (0.1%) | | | | | |
ND State Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds (Home | | | | | |
Mtge.), Ser. D, 5.95s, 7/1/19 | Aa1 | | 895,000 | | 901,668 |
|
|
Ohio (2.1%) | | | | | |
Coshocton Cnty., Env. Rev. Bonds (Smurfit- | | | | | |
Stone Container Corp.), 5 1/8s, 8/1/13 | CCC+ | | 1,600,000 | | 1,607,440 |
Cuyahoga Cnty., Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, 6s, 1/1/15 | AA– | | 4,500,000 | | 5,012,010 |
OH State Env. Impt. Rev. Bonds (USX Corp.), | | | | | |
5 5/8s, 5/1/29 | Baa1 | | 750,000 | | 790,853 |
48
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Ohio continued | | | | | |
OH State Higher Edl. Fac. Mandatory | | | | | |
Put Bonds (Kenyon College) | | | | | |
4.95s, 7/1/15 | A+ | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,624,325 |
4.85s, 7/1/14 | A+ | | 5,000,000 | | 5,204,850 |
4.7s, 7/1/13 | A+ | | 5,000,000 | | 5,147,450 |
OH State Higher Edl. Fac. Rev. Bonds (Case | | | | | |
Western Reserve U.), 5 1/2s, 10/1/22 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | AA– | | 3,000,000 | | 3,261,960 |
OH State Wtr. Dev. Auth. Poll. Control | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds, 6.1s, 8/1/20 | Baa2 | | 6,000,000 | | 6,175,380 |
OH State Wtr. Dev. Auth. Solid Waste Disp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Bay Shore Power Co.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 7/8s, 9/1/20 | BB+/P | | 1,200,000 | | 1,210,872 |
| | | | | 31,035,140 |
|
|
Oklahoma (0.8%) | | | | | |
OK Dev. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Hillcrest Hlth. | | | | | |
Care Syst.), Ser. A, U.S. Govt. Coll., 5 5/8s, | | | | | |
8/15/29 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,075,000 | | 3,236,192 |
OK Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Single Fam. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Homeowner Loan), Ser. D-2, GNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FNMA Coll., 7.1s, 9/1/26 | Aaa | | 725,000 | | 750,861 |
(Homeownership Loan), Ser. C-2, GNMA | | | | | |
Coll., FNMA Coll., 5.7s, 9/1/35 | Aaa | | 1,670,000 | | 1,749,091 |
(Homeownership Loan), Ser. B, | | | | | |
5.35s, 3/1/35 | Aaa | | 2,135,000 | | 2,227,638 |
OK State Cap. Impt. Auth. State Facs. VRDN | | | | | |
(Higher Ed.), Ser. D-1, CIFG, 3.74s, 7/1/31 | VMIG1 | | 3,700,000 | | 3,700,000 |
| | | | | 11,663,782 |
|
|
Oregon (0.9%) | | | | | |
Multnomah Cnty., Hosp. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Terwilliger Plaza), 6 1/2s, 12/1/29 | BB–/P | | 8,900,000 | | 9,347,225 |
OR State G.O. Bonds (Veterans Welfare), | | | | | |
Ser. 81, 5 1/4s, 10/1/42 | Aa3 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,063,860 |
OR State Hsg. & Cmnty. Svcs. Dept. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Single Fam. Mtge.), Ser. B, 5 3/8s, 7/1/34 | Aa2 | | 1,885,000 | | 1,949,373 |
| | | | | 13,360,458 |
|
|
Pennsylvania (4.8%) | | | | | |
Allegheny Cnty., Hosp. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Hlth. Syst.), Ser. B, 9 1/4s, 11/15/15 | Ba3 | | 6,255,000 | | 7,423,809 |
Allegheny Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Env. Impt.), 5 1/2s, 11/1/16 | BB | | 2,805,000 | | 2,962,809 |
(Env. Impt. USX Corp.), 4 3/4s, 12/1/32 | Baa1 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,193,700 |
Bucks Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Retirement Cmnty. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Ann’s Choice, Inc.), Ser. A | | | | | |
6 1/8s, 1/1/25 | BB/P | | 3,840,000 | | 4,072,896 |
5.1s, 1/1/12 | BB/P | | 600,000 | | 604,110 |
49
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Pennsylvania continued | | | | | |
Carbon Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Panther Creek Partners), 6.65s, 5/1/10 | BBB– | $ | 7,505,000 | $ | 7,773,904 |
Chester Cnty., Hlth. & Ed. Fac. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Jenners Pond, Inc.) | | | | | |
7 5/8s, 7/1/34 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 1,700,000 | | 2,036,226 |
7 1/4s, 7/1/24 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 1,725,000 | | 2,034,896 |
Lancaster Cnty., Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Gen. Hosp.), 5 1/2s, 3/15/26 (Prerefunded) | A+ | | 1,500,000 | | 1,647,780 |
Lebanon Cnty., Hlth. Facs. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Pleasant View Retirement), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 12/15/20 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,008,630 |
Lehigh Cnty., Gen. Purpose Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(St. Luke’s Hosp. — Bethlehem), | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 8/15/33 | Baa1 | | 5,250,000 | | 5,495,175 |
(Lehigh Valley Hosp. Hlth. Network), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5 1/4s, 7/1/32 | A1 | | 3,860,000 | | 4,035,244 |
Montgomery Cnty., Indl. Auth. Resource | | | | | |
Recvy. Rev. Bonds (Whitemarsh Cont Care), | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 2/1/35 | B/P | | 2,400,000 | | 2,540,520 |
New Morgan, Indl. Dev. Auth. Solid Waste | | | | | |
Disp. Rev. Bonds (New Morgan | | | | | |
Landfill Co., Inc.), 6 1/2s, 4/1/19 | BB– | | 1,750,000 | | 1,752,783 |
PA State Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth. Resource Recvy. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Northampton Generating), Ser. A | | | | | |
6.6s, 1/1/19 | B+ | | 1,100,000 | | 1,116,588 |
6 1/2s, 1/1/13 | B+ | | 3,000,000 | | 3,041,940 |
PA State Higher Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Widener U.), 5.4s, 7/15/36 | BBB+ | | 1,500,000 | | 1,578,180 |
Philadelphia, Hosp. & Higher Ed. Fac. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Graduate Hlth. Syst. Oblig. | | | | | |
Group), 7 1/4s, 7/1/18 (In default) † | D/P | | 4,858,731 | | 9,717 |
Sayre, Hlth. Care Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Guthrie Hlth.), Ser. A, 5 7/8s, 12/1/31 | A– | | 2,750,000 | | 2,972,750 |
Scranton, G.O. Bonds, Ser. C | | | | | |
7.1s, 9/1/31 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 3,060,000 | | 3,471,815 |
7s, 9/1/22 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,130,420 |
Washington Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Hlth. Care | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (First Mtge. AHF/Central), | | | | | |
7 3/4s, 1/1/29 | B/P | | 1,245,000 | | 1,306,839 |
West Cornwall, Tpk. Muni. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Elizabethtown College), 6s, 12/15/27 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | BBB+ | | 2,500,000 | | 2,734,925 |
West Shore, Area Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Holy Spirit Hosp.), 6 1/4s, 1/1/32 | BBB | | 2,000,000 | | 2,139,720 |
York Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(PSEG Power, LLC), Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 9/1/20 | Baa1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,107,540 |
| | | | | 70,192,916 |
50
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Puerto Rico (1.1%) | | | | | |
Cmnwlth. of PR, G.O. Bonds (Pub. Impt.), | | | | | |
Ser. B, 5 1/4s, 7/1/17 | BBB | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,722,400 |
Cmnwlth. of PR, Hwy. & Trans. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. K, 5s, 7/1/21 | BBB+ | | 5,500,000 | | 5,768,950 |
PR Indl. Tourist Edl. Med. & Env. Control | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Cogen. Fac.-AES), | | | | | |
6 5/8s, 6/1/26 | Baa3 | | 7,400,000 | | 8,053,420 |
| | | | | 16,544,770 |
|
|
Rhode Island (0.2%) | | | | | |
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 6/1/42 | BBB | | 1,310,000 | | 1,398,805 |
6 1/8s, 6/1/32 | BBB | | 1,465,000 | | 1,565,733 |
| | | | | 2,964,538 |
|
|
South Carolina (3.2%) | | | | | |
Piedmont, Muni. Elec. Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, FGIC, 6 1/2s, 1/1/16 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,080,000 | | 3,677,489 |
Ser. A, FGIC, 6 1/2s, 1/1/16 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 630,000 | | 741,315 |
(Unrefunded Balance 2004), Ser. A, FGIC, | | | | | |
6 1/2s, 1/1/16 | Aaa | | 2,410,000 | | 2,859,561 |
SC Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Med. U.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/2s, 8/15/32 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 5,750,000 | | 6,511,300 |
SC Hsg. Fin. & Dev. Auth. Mtge. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A-2, AMBAC, 5s, 7/1/35 | Aaa | | 2,640,000 | | 2,704,495 |
SC Jobs Econ. Dev. Auth. Hosp. Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Palmetto Hlth. Alliance), Ser. A, 7 3/8s, | | | | | |
12/15/21 (Prerefunded) | BBB+/F | | 3,800,000 | | 4,334,318 |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. C, 6 3/8s, 8/1/34 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 2,670,000 | | 3,045,616 |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. C, 6 3/8s, 8/1/34 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 330,000 | | 376,424 |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. C, 6s, 8/1/20 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 4,450,000 | | 4,981,197 |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. C, 6s, 8/1/20 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 550,000 | | 615,654 |
SC Tobacco Settlement Rev. Mgt. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. B | | | | | |
6 3/8s, 5/15/30 | BBB | | 9,000,000 | | 10,457,460 |
6 3/8s, 5/15/28 | BBB | | 6,000,000 | | 6,446,100 |
| | | | | 46,750,929 |
51
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
South Dakota (0.4%) | | | | | |
SD Edl. Enhancement Funding Corp. SD | | | | | |
Tobacco Rev. Bonds, Ser. B, 6 1/2s, 6/1/32 | BBB | $ | 3,550,000 | $ | 3,889,274 |
SD State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Sioux Valley Hosp. & Hlth. Syst.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 11/1/31 | A1 | | 1,230,000 | | 1,313,689 |
| | | | | 5,202,963 |
|
|
Tennessee (1.4%) | | | | | |
Elizabethton, Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Board Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Hosp. Ref. & Impt.), Ser. B, 8s, 7/1/33 | Baa2 | | 4,000,000 | | 4,688,960 |
Johnson City, Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Board | | | | | |
Hosp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(First Mtge. Mountain States Hlth.), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 7 1/2s, 7/1/33 | BBB+ | | 6,500,000 | | 7,534,995 |
(Mountain States Hlth.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
7 1/2s, 7/1/25 | BBB+ | | 3,000,000 | | 3,484,440 |
Memphis-Shelby Cnty., Arpt. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Federal Express Corp.) | | | | | |
5.05s, 9/1/12 | Baa2 | | 500,000 | | 522,925 |
4 1/2s, 7/1/14 | Baa2 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,020,000 |
Sullivan Cnty., Hlth. Edl. & Hsg. Hosp. Fac. | | | | | |
Board Rev. Bonds (Wellmont Hlth. Syst.), | | | | | |
Ser. C | | | | | |
5s, 9/1/22 | BBB+ | | 420,000 | | 433,860 |
5s, 9/1/19 | BBB+ | | 1,460,000 | | 1,510,472 |
| | | | | 20,195,652 |
|
|
Texas (5.7%) | | | | | |
Abilene, Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Sears Methodist Retirement), Ser. A | | | | | |
7s, 11/15/33 | BB/P | | 2,500,000 | | 2,710,575 |
5.9s, 11/15/25 | BB/P | | 6,850,000 | | 6,936,995 |
Bexar Cnty., Hsg. Fin. Auth. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(American Opty-Waterford), Ser. A1, | | | | | |
7s, 12/1/36 | Baa2 | | 4,500,000 | | 4,853,295 |
Crawford Ed. Fac. Rev. Bonds (U. St. Thomas), | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 10/1/27 | BBB+ | | 3,985,000 | | 4,157,152 |
Denton, G.O. Bonds, VRDN, Ser. 05-A, | | | | | |
3.53s, 8/1/35 | A–1+ | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Edgewood, Indpt. School Dist. Bexar Cnty. | | | | | |
G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, PSFG, 5s, 2/15/29 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,213,350 |
Fort Worth, Higher Ed. Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Wesleyan U.), Ser. A, 6s, 10/1/12 | Ba2 | | 1,720,000 | | 1,731,593 |
Georgetown, Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Georgetown Hlth. Care Syst.), 6 1/4s, 8/15/29 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 4,100,000 | | 4,410,288 |
Harris Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. Hosp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Memorial Hermann Hlth. Care Syst.), | | | | | |
Class A, 5 1/4s, 12/1/17 | A+ | | 1,500,000 | | 1,600,905 |
52
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Texas continued | | | | | |
Houston, Arpt. Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Special Fac. — Continental Airlines, Inc.), | | | | | |
Ser. E, 6 3/4s, 7/1/21 | B– | $ | 7,000,000 | $ | 7,607,180 |
(Continental Airlines, Inc.), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5.7s, 7/15/29 | B– | | 3,000,000 | | 3,074,940 |
North Central TX Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. | | | | | |
VRDN (Hosp. Presbyterian Med. Ctr.), | | | | | |
Ser. D, MBIA, 1.65s, 12/1/15 | VMIG1 | | 700,000 | | 700,000 |
North East Indpt. School Dist. G.O. Bonds, | | | | | |
PSFG, 5s, 8/1/29 | Aaa | | 7,150,000 | | 7,472,179 |
Round Rock, Hotel Occupancy Tax Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Convention Ctr. Complex), 5.85s, 12/1/24 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | BBB/P | | 5,265,000 | | 5,545,151 |
Sabine River Auth. Rev. Bonds (TXU Electric), | | | | | |
Ser. C, 5.2s, 5/1/28 | Baa2 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,045,630 |
Sam Rayburn Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
6s, 10/1/21 | Baa2 | | 8,000,000 | | 8,457,840 |
Tarrant Cnty., Cultural Ed. Fac. Fin. Corp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Northwest Sr. Hsg. Edgemere), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 11/15/16 | BB–/P | | 775,000 | | 821,919 |
Tarrant Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Dev. (TX Hlth. | | | | | |
Resource Sys.), Ser. A, MBIA, 5 3/4s, 2/15/12 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 4,329,160 |
Tomball, Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Tomball | | | | | |
Regl. Hosp.), 6s, 7/1/25 | Baa3 | | 4,945,000 | | 5,154,223 |
TX State Dept. of Hsg. & Cmnty. Affairs | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Single Fam.), Ser. F, FHA | | | | | |
Insd., 5 3/4s, 3/1/37 | AAA | | 5,000,000 | | 5,335,800 |
| | | | | 82,158,175 |
|
|
Utah (0.3%) | | | | | |
Carbon Cnty., Solid Waste Disp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Laidlaw Env.), Ser. A | | | | | |
7 1/2s, 2/1/10 | BB– | | 1,000,000 | | 1,009,690 |
7.45s, 7/1/17 | B+/P | | 600,000 | | 618,882 |
Tooele Cnty., Harbor & Term. Dist. Port | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Union Pacific), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5.7s, 11/1/26 | Baa2 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,119,790 |
| | | | | 4,748,362 |
|
|
Vermont (0.2%) | | | | | |
VT Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. 22, FSA, 5s, 11/1/34 | Aaa | | 960,000 | | 979,267 |
(Single Fam.), Ser. 23, FSA, 5s, 5/1/34 | Aaa | | 1,395,000 | | 1,425,997 |
| | | | | 2,405,264 |
53
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Virginia (2.1%) | | | | | |
Clarke Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Hosp. Facs. | | | | | |
VRDN (Winchester Med. Ctr., Inc.), FSA, | | | | | |
3.51s, 1/1/30 | VMIG1 | $ | 600,000 | $ | 600,000 |
Henrico Cnty., Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(United Methodist), Ser. A | | | | | |
6.7s, 6/1/27 | BB+/P | | 5,250,000 | | 5,593,980 |
6 1/2s, 6/1/22 | BB+/P | | 3,000,000 | | 3,190,470 |
Hopewell, Indl. Dev. Auth. Env. Impt. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.), | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 6/1/15 | CCC+ | | 2,000,000 | | 2,026,620 |
James Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Williamsburg), Ser. A, 6 1/8s, 3/1/32 | BB–/P | | 2,500,000 | | 2,664,800 |
Peninsula Ports Auth. Rev. Bonds (VA Baptist | | | | | |
Homes), Ser. A, 7 3/8s, 12/1/32 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 4,000,000 | | 4,812,000 |
Suffolk, Redev. & Hsg. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Beach-Oxford Apts.) | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 10/1/33 (acquired 8/18/98, | | | | | |
cost $5,510,000) ‡ | BB–/P | | 5,510,000 | | 5,592,650 |
6.1s, 4/1/26 ( acquired 8/18/98, | | | | | |
cost $5,000,000) ‡ | BB–/P | | 5,000,000 | | 5,070,300 |
Winchester, Indl. Dev. Auth. Res. Care Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Westminster-Canterbury), Ser. A | | | | | |
5.3s, 1/1/35 | BB | | 1,000,000 | | 1,018,690 |
5.2s, 1/1/27 | BB/P | | 300,000 | | 305,433 |
| | | | | 30,874,943 |
|
|
Washington (2.2%) | | | | | |
Tobacco Settlement Auth. of WA Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
6 5/8s, 6/1/32 | BBB | | 6,250,000 | | 6,890,188 |
6 1/2s, 6/1/26 | BBB | | 10,965,000 | | 12,051,632 |
WA State Hsg. Fin. Comm. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Single Fam.), Ser. 3A, GNMA Coll., FNMA | | | | | |
Coll., 4.15s, 12/1/25 | Aaa | | 2,475,000 | | 2,462,972 |
WA State Pub. Pwr. Supply Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Nuclear No. 3), Ser. B, MBIA, 7 1/8s, 7/1/16 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 6,152,750 |
Washington Cnty., Hsg. & Redev. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Healtheast), 5 1/2s, 11/15/27 | Baa3 | | 4,250,000 | | 4,352,000 |
| | | | | 31,909,542 |
|
|
West Virginia (0.9%) | | | | | |
Mason Cnty., Poll. Control FRB (Appalachian | | | | | |
Pwr. Co. Project), Ser. L, 5 1/2s, 10/1/22 | Baa2 | | 3,475,000 | | 3,591,274 |
Princeton, Hosp. Rev. Bonds (Cmnty. Hosp. | | | | | |
Assn., Inc.), 6.1s, 5/1/29 | B2 | | 4,525,000 | | 4,638,985 |
WV State G.O. Bonds, Ser. D, FGIC, 6 1/2s, | | | | | |
11/1/26 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,600,000 | | 4,391,676 |
| | | | | 12,621,935 |
54
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Wisconsin (1.6%) | | | | | |
Badger Tobacco Settlement Asset | | | | | |
Securitization Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
7s, 6/1/28 | BBB | $ | 2,280,000 | $ | 2,540,080 |
6 3/8s, 6/1/32 | BBB | | 13,250,000 | | 14,452,438 |
WI Hsg. & Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Home Ownership), Ser. D, 4 7/8s, 3/1/36 | Aa2 | | 1,955,000 | | 1,996,857 |
WI State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Wheaton Franciscan Svcs.), 5 1/8s, 8/15/33 | A3 | | 2,500,000 | | 2,567,575 |
(Ascension Hlth. Credit), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5s, 11/15/31 | Aa2 | | 1,100,000 | | 1,147,476 |
| | | | | 22,704,426 |
|
|
Wyoming (0.2%) | | | | | |
Sweetwater Cnty., Solid Waste Disp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (FMC Corp.), 5.6s, 12/1/35 | Baa3 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,125,629 |
Uinta Cnty. Poll. Control VRDN (Chevron | | | | | |
USA, Inc.), 3.7s, 8/15/20 | P–1 | | 1,075,000 | | 1,075,000 |
| | | | | 3,200,629 |
|
|
Total municipal bonds and notes (cost $1,338,880,939) | | | $ | 1,413,028,196 |
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCKS (1.0%)* | | | | | |
| | | Shares | | Value |
|
Charter Mac. Equity Trust 144A Ser. A, 6.625% | | | | | |
cum. pfd. | | | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,100,780 |
MuniMae Tax Exempt Bond Subsidiary, LLC | | | | | |
144A Ser. A, 6.875% cum. pfd. | | | 6,000,000 | | 6,336,180 |
MuniMae Tax Exempt Bond Subsidiary, LLC | | | | | |
144A Ser. B, 7 3/4s cum. pfd. | | | 6,000,000 | | 6,587,820 |
|
Total preferred stocks (cost $14,000,000) | | | | $ | 15,024,780 |
|
|
|
CORPORATE BONDS AND NOTES (0.3%)* (cost $4,500,000) | | | | |
| | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
GMAC Muni. Mtge. Trust 144A sub. notes | | | | | |
Ser. A1-1, 4.15s, 2039 | | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 4,472,145 |
|
|
|
COMMON STOCKS (—%)* (cost $9,057,285) | | | | | |
| | | Shares | | Value |
|
Tembec, Inc. (Canada) † | | | 184,103 | $ | 466,758 |
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS | | | | | |
|
Total investments (cost $1,366,438,224) | | | | $ | 1,432,991,879 |
55
* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $1,448,950,061.
** The Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, Fitch’s ratings indicated are believed to be the most recent ratings available at January 31, 2007 for the securities listed. Ratings are generally ascribed to securities at the time of issuance. While the agencies may from time to time revise such ratings, they undertake no obligation to do so, and the ratings do not necessarily represent what the agencies would ascribe to these securities at January 31, 2007. Securities rated by Putnam are indicated by “/P.” Securities rated by Fitch are indicated by “/F.” Security ratings are defined in the Statement of Additional Information.
† Non-income-producing security.
‡ Restricted, excluding 144A securities, as to public resale. The total market value of restricted securities held at January 31, 2007 was $19,940,843 or 1.4% of net assets.
# A portion of this security was pledged and segregated with the custodian to cover margin requirements for futures contracts at January 31, 2007.
(F) Security is valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees.
At January 31, 2007, liquid assets totaling $20,593,375 have been designated as collateral for open forward commitments and futures contracts.
144A after the name of an issuer represents securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.
The rates shown on VRDN, Mandatory Put Bonds, Floating Rate Bonds (FRB) and Floating Rate Notes (FRN) are the current interest rates at January 31, 2007.
The dates shown on Mandatory Put Bonds are the next mandatory put dates.
The dates shown on debt obligations other than Mandatory Put Bonds are the original maturity dates.
The fund had the following sector concentration greater than 10% at January 31, 2007 (as a percentage of net assets):
Health care 34.9%
FUTURES CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING at 1/31/07 (Unaudited) | | | |
| Number of | | | Expiration | Unrealized |
| contracts | Value | | date | depreciation |
|
U.S. Treasury Note 10 yr (Long) | 140 | $14,945,000 | | Mar-07 | $(131,446) |
INTEREST RATE SWAP CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING at 1/31/07 (Unaudited) | |
| | | Payments | Payments | Unrealized |
Swap counterparty / | | Termination | made by | received by | appreciation/ |
|
Notional amount | | date | fund per annum | fund per annum | (depreciation) |
Citibank, N.A. | | | | | |
$32,500,000 | (E) | 5/23/12 | 3 month USD-LIBOR-BBA | 4.923% | $(441,350) |
|
50,000,000 | (E) | 5/23/12 | 3.422% | U.S. Bond Market Association | |
| | | | Municipal Swap Index | 473,265 |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | | | | |
44,200,000 | (E) | 11/8/11 | 3 month USD-LIBOR-BBA | 5.036% | (389,402) |
|
68,000,000 | (E) | 11/8/11 | 3.488% | U.S. Bond Market Association | |
| | | | Municipal Swap Index | 317,886 |
|
Morgan Stanley Capital Services, Inc. | | | |
72,000,000 | (E) | 11/16/11 | 3.4695% | U.S. Bond Market Association | |
| | | | Municipal Swap Index | 400,680 |
|
Total | | | | | $ 361,079 |
(E) See Note 1 to the financial statements regarding extended effective dates.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
56
Statement of assets and liabilities 1/31/07 (Unaudited)
ASSETS | |
|
Investment in securities, at value (Note 1): | |
Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $1,366,438,224) | $1,432,991,879 |
|
Cash | 521,033 |
|
Interest and other receivables | 19,329,337 |
|
Receivable for shares of the fund sold | 544,313 |
|
Receivable for securities sold | 6,439,670 |
|
Receivable for variation margin (Note 1) | 41,563 |
|
Unrealized appreciation on swap contracts (Note 1) | 1,191,831 |
|
Total assets | 1,461,059,626 |
|
|
LIABILITIES | |
|
Distributions payable to shareholders | 2,115,779 |
|
Payable for securities purchased | 5,648,375 |
|
Payable for shares of the fund repurchased | 1,425,831 |
|
Payable for compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 1,243,709 |
|
Payable for investor servicing and custodian fees (Note 2) | 61,234 |
|
Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 298,187 |
|
Payable for administrative services (Note 2) | 4,152 |
|
Payable for distribution fees (Note 2) | 363,395 |
|
Unrealized depreciation on swap contracts (Note 1) | 830,752 |
|
Other accrued expenses | 118,151 |
|
Total liabilities | 12,109,565 |
|
Net assets | $1,448,950,061 |
|
|
REPRESENTED BY | |
|
Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized) (Notes 1 and 4) | $1,577,063,685 |
|
Undistributed net investment income (Note 1) | 4,431,206 |
|
Accumulated net realized loss on investments (Note 1) | (199,328,118) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | 66,783,288 |
|
Total — Representing net assets applicable to capital shares outstanding | $1,448,950,061 |
(Continued on next page)
57
Statement of assets and liabilities (Continued)
COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE | |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per class A share | |
($1,278,631,331 divided by 97,927,160 shares) | $13.06 |
|
Offering price per class A share | |
(100/96.25 of $13.06)* | $13.57 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class B share | |
($137,850,382 divided by 10,540,960 shares)** | $13.08 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class C share | |
($20,982,124 divided by 1,606,197 shares)** | $13.06 |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per class M share | |
($11,486,224 divided by 879,747 shares) | $13.06 |
|
Offering price per class M share | |
(100/96.75 of $13.06)*** | $13.50 |
* On single retail sales of less than $100,000. On sales of $100,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
** Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.
*** On single retail sales of less than $50,000. On sales of $50,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
58
Statement of operations Six months ended 1/31/07 (Unaudited)
INTEREST INCOME | $40,933,643 |
|
|
EXPENSES | |
|
Compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 3,731,783 |
|
Investor servicing fees (Note 2) | 413,529 |
|
Custodian fees (Note 2) | 90,759 |
|
Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 31,263 |
|
Administrative services (Note 2) | 12,620 |
|
Distribution fees — Class A (Note 2) | 1,431,336 |
|
Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2) | 661,016 |
|
Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2) | 108,101 |
|
Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2) | 29,351 |
|
Other | 137,983 |
|
Non-recurring costs (Notes 2 and 5) | 278 |
|
Costs assumed by Manager (Notes 2 and 5) | (278) |
|
Total expenses | 6,647,741 |
|
Expense reduction (Note 2) | (222,128) |
|
Net expenses | 6,425,613 |
|
Net investment income | 34,508,030 |
|
Net realized gain on investments (Notes 1 and 3) | 3,465,678 |
|
Net realized loss on futures contracts (Note 1) | (1,681,759) |
|
Net realized loss on swap contracts (Note 1) | (317,694) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments, swap contracts | |
and futures contracts during the period | 11,059,113 |
|
Net gain on investments | 12,525,338 |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $47,033,368 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
59
Statement of changes in net assets
DECREASE IN NET ASSETS | | |
| Six months ended | Year ended |
| 1/31/07* | 7/31/06 |
|
Operations: | | |
Net investment income | $ 34,508,030 | $ 72,511,882 |
|
Net realized gain on investments | 1,466,225 | 10,287,364 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 11,059,113 | (19,390,182) |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 47,033,368 | 63,409,064 |
|
Distributions to shareholders: (Note 1) | | |
|
From ordinary income | | |
|
Taxable net investment income | | |
|
Class A | (483,683) | (277,685) |
|
Class B | (55,032) | (44,872) |
|
Class C | (8,017) | (4,600) |
|
Class M | (4,353) | (2,499) |
|
From tax-exempt net investment income | | |
|
Class A | (30,455,904) | (61,557,412) |
|
Class B | (3,146,705) | (8,252,507) |
|
Class C | (420,302) | (853,874) |
|
Class M | (257,781) | (518,992) |
|
Redemption fees (Note 1) | — | 4 |
|
Decrease from capital share transactions (Note 4) | (59,383,830) | (149,567,041) |
|
Total decrease in net assets | (47,182,239) | (157,670,414) |
|
|
NET ASSETS | | |
|
Beginning of period | 1,496,132,300 | 1,653,802,714 |
|
End of period (including undistributed net investment | | |
income of $4,431,206 and $4,754,953, respectively) | $1,448,950,061 | $1,496,132,300 |
* Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
60
This page left blank intentionally.
61
Financial highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | LESS DISTRIBUTIONS: | | | | RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |
|
| | | Net | | | | | | Total | | | Ratio of net | |
| Net asset | | realized and | Total | From | | | Net asset | return | Net | Ratio of | investment | |
| value, | Net | unrealized | from | net | | | value, | at net | assets, | expenses to | income (loss) | Portfolio |
| beginning | investment | gain (loss) on | investment | investment | Total | Redemption | end | asset | end of period | average net | to average | turnover |
Period ended | of period | income (loss) | investments | operations | income | distributions | fees | of period | value (%)(a) | (in thousands) | assets (%)(b) | net assets (%) | (%) |
|
CLASS A | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2007** | $12.95 | .31 | .11 | .42 | (.31) | (.31) | — | $13.06 | 3.29* | $1,278,631 | .41* | 2.37* | 8.85* |
July 31, 2006 | 13.02 | .62(c) | (.09) | .53 | (.60) | (.60) | —(d) | 12.95 | 4.21 | 1,293,442 | .82(c) | 4.73(c) | 16.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 12.46 | .60(c) | .57 | 1.17 | (.61) | (.61) | —(d) | 13.02 | 9.59 | 1,375,968 | .85(c) | 4.77(c) | 21.33 |
July 31, 2004 | 12.31 | .68(c) | .15 | .83 | (.68) | (.68) | — | 12.46 | 6.87 | 798,737 | .92(c) | 5.43(c) | 18.25 |
July 31, 2003 | 12.88 | .74 | (.57) | .17 | (.74) | (.74) | — | 12.31 | 1.34 | 1,000,769 | .91 | 5.83 | 28.90 |
July 31, 2002 | 13.39 | .83 | (.52) | .31 | (.82) | (.82) | — | 12.88 | 2.38 | 1,115,695 | .90 | 6.31 | 19.87 |
|
|
CLASS B | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2007** | $12.97 | .27 | .11 | .38 | (.27) | (.27) | — | $13.08 | 2.99* | $137,850 | .73* | 2.05* | 8.85* |
July 31, 2006 | 13.04 | .53(c) | (.08) | .45 | (.52) | (.52) | —(d) | 12.97 | 3.60 | 169,789 | 1.45(c) | 4.09(c) | 16.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 12.48 | .52(c) | .57 | 1.09 | (.53) | (.53) | —(d) | 13.04 | 8.82 | 242,213 | 1.49(c) | 4.15(c) | 21.33 |
July 31, 2004 | 12.33 | .60(c) | .15 | .75 | (.60) | (.60) | — | 12.48 | 6.16 | 180,830 | 1.57(c) | 4.78(c) | 18.25 |
July 31, 2003 | 12.90 | .67 | (.57) | .10 | (.67) | (.67) | — | 12.33 | .82 | 222,970 | 1.43 | 5.32 | 28.90 |
July 31, 2002 | 13.41 | .76 | (.52) | .24 | (.75) | (.75) | — | 12.90 | 1.88 | 281,825 | 1.40 | 5.83 | 19.87 |
|
|
CLASS C | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2007** | $12.96 | .26 | .10 | .36 | (.26) | (.26) | — | $13.06 | 2.77* | $20,982 | .80* | 1.98* | 8.85* |
July 31, 2006 | 13.02 | .51(c) | (.07) | .44 | (.50) | (.50) | —(d) | 12.96 | 3.44 | 21,381 | 1.60(c) | 3.95(c) | 16.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 12.47 | .50(c) | .56 | 1.06 | (.51) | (.51) | —(d) | 13.02 | 8.64 | 23,054 | 1.64(c) | 3.97(c) | 21.33 |
July 31, 2004 | 12.31 | .58(c) | .16 | .74 | (.58) | (.58) | — | 12.47 | 6.11 | 10,600 | 1.72(c) | 4.64(c) | 18.25 |
July 31, 2003 | 12.89 | .64 | (.58) | .06 | (.64) | (.64) | — | 12.31 | .45 | 12,028 | 1.71 | 5.02 | 28.90 |
July 31, 2002 | 13.39 | .72 | (.51) | .21 | (.71) | (.71) | — | 12.89 | 1.64 | 11,002 | 1.70 | 5.46 | 19.87 |
|
|
CLASS M | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2007** | $12.95 | .29 | .11 | .40 | (.29) | (.29) | — | $13.06 | 3.13* | $11,486 | .55* | 2.23* | 8.85* |
July 31, 2006 | 13.01 | .58(c) | (.07) | .51 | (.57) | (.57) | —(d) | 12.95 | 3.97 | 11,521 | 1.10(c) | 4.45(c) | 16.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 12.46 | .56(c) | .56 | 1.12 | (.57) | (.57) | —(d) | 13.01 | 9.17 | 12,567 | 1.14(c) | 4.47(c) | 21.33 |
July 31, 2004 | 12.31 | .64(c) | .15 | .79 | (.64) | (.64) | — | 12.46 | 6.56 | 6,985 | 1.22(c) | 5.13(c) | 18.25 |
July 31, 2003 | 12.89 | .70 | (.58) | .12 | (.70) | (.70) | — | 12.31 | .96 | 10,429 | 1.21 | 5.54 | 28.90 |
July 31, 2002 | 13.39 | .79 | (.51) | .28 | (.78) | (.78) | — | 12.89 | 2.16 | 11,706 | 1.20 | 6.00 | 19.87 |
|
* Not annualized.
** Unaudited.
(a) Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.
(b) Includes amounts paid through expense offset arrangements (Note 2).
(c) Reflects an involuntary contractual expense limitation in effect during the period. As a result of such limitation, the expenses of each class, as a percentage of its net assets, reflect a reduction of the following amounts (Note 2):
| 7/31/06 | 7/31/05 | 7/31/04 |
|
Class A | <0.01% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
|
Class B | <0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
|
Class C | <0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
|
Class M | <0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
|
(d) Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to financial statements 1/31/07 (Unaudited)
Note 1: Significant accounting policies
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund (the “fund”) is a series of Putnam Tax Free Income Trust (the “trust”), a Massachusetts business trust, which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open end management investment company. The fund pursues its objective of seeking high current income exempt from federal income tax by investing primarily in a combination of lower-rated and investment-grade tax-exempt securities constituting a portfolio that Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”), the fund’s manager, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC, believes does not involve undue risk to income or principal. The fund may invest in higher yielding, lower rated bonds that have a higher rate of default.
The fund offers class A, class B, class C and class M shares. Class A and class M shares are sold with a maximum front-end sales charge of 3.75% and 3.25%, respectively, and generally do not pay contingent deferred sales charges. Class B shares, which convert to class A shares after approximately eight years, do not pay a front-end sales charge, and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge, if those shares are redeemed within six years of purchase. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge and do not convert to class A shares. The expenses for class A, class B, class C and class M shares may differ based on the distribution fee of each class, which is identified in Note 2.
Effective October 2, 2006, a 1.00% redemption fee may apply on any shares purchased on or after such date that are redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 7 days of purchase. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in-capital. Prior to October 2, 2006, a 2.00% redemption fee applied to any shares that were redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 5 days of purchase.
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the fund are borne pro-rata based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund, except that each class bears expenses unique to that class (including the distribution fees applicable to such classes). Each class votes as a class only with respect to its own distribution plan or other matters on which a class vote is required by law or determined by the Trustees. Shares of each class would receive their pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund, if the fund were liquidated. In addition, the Trustees declare separate dividends on each class of shares.
In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund expects the risk of material loss to be remote.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A) Security valuation Tax-exempt bonds and notes are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by an independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. Such services use information with respect to transactions in bonds, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various relationships between securities in determining value. Certain investments are also valued at fair
64
value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably expect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security at a given point in time and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.
B) Security transactions and related investment income Security transactions are recorded on the trade date (the date the order to buy or sell is executed). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis.
All premiums/discounts are amortized/accreted on a yield-to-maturity basis. The premium in excess of the call price, if any, is amortized to the call date; thereafter, any remaining premium is amortized to maturity.
C) Futures and options contracts The fund may use futures and options contracts to hedge against changes in the values of securities the fund owns or expects to purchase, or for other investment purposes. The fund may also write options on swaps or securities it owns or in which it may invest to increase its current returns.
The potential risk to the fund is that the change in value of futures and options contracts may not correspond to the change in value of the hedged instruments. In addition, losses may arise from changes in the value of the underlying instruments, if there is an illiquid secondary market for the contracts, or if the counterparty to the contract is unable to perform. Risks may exceed amounts recognized on the statement of assets and liabilities. When the contract is closed, the fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Realized gains and losses on purchased options are included in realized gains and losses on investment securities. If a written call option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as an addition to sales proceeds. If a writt en put option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as a reduction to the cost of investments.
Futures contracts are valued at the quoted daily settlement prices established by the exchange on which they trade. The fund and the broker agree to exchange an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the futures contract. Such receipts or payments are known as “variation margin.” Exchange traded options are valued at the last sale price or, if no sales are reported, the last bid price for purchased options and the last ask price for written options. Options traded over-the-counter are valued using prices supplied by dealers. Futures and written option contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
D) Interest rate swap contracts The fund may enter into interest rate swap contracts, which are arrangements between two parties to exchange cash flows based on a notional principal amount, to manage the fund’s exposure to interest rates. Interest rate swap contracts are marked to market daily based upon quotations from an independent pricing service or market makers and the change, if any, is recorded as unrealized gain or loss. Payments received or made are recorded as realized gains or loss. Certain interest rate swap contracts may include extended effective dates. Income related to these swap contracts is accrued based on the terms of the contract. The fund could be exposed to credit or market risk due to unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or if the counter-party defaults on its obligation to perform. Risk of loss may exceed amounts recognized on the statement of assets and liabilities. Interest rate swap contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
65
E) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code, as amended. Therefore, no provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains.
At July 31, 2006, the fund had a capital loss carryover of $195,588,909 available to the extent allowed by the Code to offset future net capital gain, if any. The amount of the carryover and the expiration dates are:
Loss Carryover | Expiration |
|
$34,691,361 | July 31, 2007 |
|
8,579,409 | July 31, 2008 |
|
1,682,906 | July 31, 2009 |
|
1,466,587 | July 31, 2010 |
|
24,697,987 | July 31, 2011 |
|
87,799,907 | July 31, 2012 |
|
36,670,752 | July 31, 2013 |
|
The aggregate identified cost on a tax basis is $1,365,797,215, resulting in gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of $84,169,296 and $16,974,632, respectively, or net unrealized depreciation of $67,194,664.
F) Distributions to shareholders Distributions to shareholders from net investment income are recorded by the fund on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. Actual results may vary. Any non-taxable return of capital cannot be determined until final tax calculations are completed after the end of the fund’s fiscal year. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) unde r income tax regulations.
G) Expenses of the trust Expenses directly charged or attributable to any fund will be paid from the assets of that fund. Generally, expenses of the trust will be allocated among and charged to the assets of each fund on a basis that the Trustees deem fair and equitable, which may be based on the relative assets of each fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each fund.
Note 2: Management fee, administrative services and other transactions
Putnam Management is paid for management and investment advisory services monthly based on the average net assets of the fund. Such fee is based on the lesser of (i) and annual rate of 0.50% of the average net asset value of the fund or (ii) the following annual rates: 0.60% of the first $500 million of average net assets, 0.50% of the next $500 million, 0.45% of the next $500 million, 0.40% of the next $5 billion, 0.375% of the next $5 billion, 0.355% of the next $5 billion, and 0.34% of the next $5 billion and 0.33% thereafter.
Putnam Management has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund through June 30, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds viewed by Lipper Inc. as having the same investment classification or objective as the fund. The expense reimbursement is based on a comparison of the fund’s expenses with the average annualized operating expenses of the funds in its Lipper peer group for each calendar quarter during the fund’s last fiscal year, excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. For the period ended January 31, 2007,
66
Putnam Management did not waive any of its management fee from the fund.
For the period ended January 31, 2007, Putnam Management has assumed $278 of legal, shareholder servicing and communication, audit and Trustee fees incurred by the fund in connection with certain legal and regulatory matters (including those described in Note 5).
The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.
Custodial functions for the fund’s assets were provided by Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), a subsidiary of Putnam, LLC. PFTC received fees for custody services based on the fund’s asset level, the number of its security holdings and transaction volumes. Putnam Investor Services, a division of PFTC, provided investor servicing agent functions to the fund. Putnam Investor Services received fees for investor servicing based on the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in the fund. During the period ended January 31, 2007, the fund incurred $504,288 for these services. State Street Bank and Trust Company will begin providing custodial functions for the fund’s assets in the subsequent period.
The fund has entered into an arrangement with PFTC whereby credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances are used to reduce a portion of the fund’s expenses. For the six months ended January 31, 2007, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $222,128 under these arrangements.
Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $526, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings, industry seminars and for certain compliance-related matters. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees. George Putnam, III, who is not an independent Trustee, also receives the foregoing fees for his services as Trustee.
The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”) which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the Deferral Plan.
The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) covering all Trustees of the fund who have served as a Trustee for at least five years and were first elected prior to 2004. Benefits under the Pension Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee’s average annual attendance and retainer fees for the three years ended December 31, 2005. The retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. Pension expense for the fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses in the statement of assets and liabilities. The Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected after 2003.
The fund has adopted distribution plans (the “Plans”) with respect to its class A, class B, class C and class M shares pursuant to rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management at an annual rate of up to 0.35%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 1.00% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C and class M shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at the annual rate of 0.85%, 1.00% and 0.50% of the
67
average net assets for class B, class C and class M shares, respectively. For class A shares, the annual payment rate will equal the weighted average of (i) 0.20% on the net assets of the fund attributable to class A shares purchased and paid for prior to March 21, 2005 and (ii) 0.25% on all other net assets of the fund attributable to class A shares.
For the six months ended January 31, 2007, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $24,540 and $353 from the sale of class A and class M shares, respectively, and received $61,128 and $160 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares, respectively.
A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% is assessed on certain redemptions of class A shares that were purchased without an initial sales charge as part of an investment of $1 million or more. For the six months ended January 31, 2007, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received $3,301 on class A redemptions.
Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities
During the six months ended January 31, 2007, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments aggregated $128,239,858 and $164,864,471, respectively. There were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
Note 4: Capital shares
At January 31, 2007, there was an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
CLASS A | Shares | | Amount |
|
Six months ended 1/31/07: | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 3,606,858 | $ | 47,224,179 |
|
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 1,631,139 | | 21,334,538 |
|
| 5,237,997 | | 68,558,717 |
|
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (7,173,909) | | (93,870,526) |
|
Net decrease | (1,935,912) | $ | (25,311,809) |
|
Year ended 7/31/06: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 6,561,827 | $ | 84,910,461 |
|
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 3,088,034 | | 39,968,724 |
|
| 9,649,861 | 124,879,185 |
|
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (15,506,541) | (200,691,184) |
|
Net decrease | (5,856,680) | $ | (75,811,999) |
|
|
CLASS B | Shares | | Amount |
|
Six months ended 1/31/07: | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 146,764 | $ | 1,924,023 |
|
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 141,879 | | 1,858,397 |
|
| 288,643 | | 3,782,420 |
|
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (2,835,746) | | (37,151,124) |
|
Net decrease | (2,547,103) | $ | (33,368,704) |
|
Year ended 7/31/06: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 382,457 | $ | 4,651,310 |
|
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 325,229 | | 4,525,182 |
|
| 707,686 | | 9,176,492 |
|
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (6,200,211) | | (80,385,967) |
|
Net decrease | (5,492,525) | $ | (71,209,475) |
68
CLASS C | Shares | | Amount |
|
Six months ended 1/31/07: | | |
| | |
Shares sold | 98,418 | $ | 1,286,368 |
|
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 18,928 | | 247,655 |
|
| 117,346 | | 1,534,023 |
|
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (161,094) | (2,108,271) |
|
Net decrease | (43,748) | $ | (574,248) |
|
Year ended 7/31/06: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 219,278 | $ | 2,880,196 |
|
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 37,066 | | 439,711 |
|
| 256,344 | | 3,319,907 |
|
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (376,791) | (4,880,043) |
|
Net decrease | (120,447) | $ | (1,560,136) |
|
|
CLASS M | Shares | | Amount |
|
Six months ended 1/31/07: | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 25,438 | $ | 331,727 |
|
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 15,519 | | 202,989 |
|
| 40,957 | | 534,716 |
|
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (50,722) | | (663,785) |
|
Net decrease | (9,765) | $ | (129,069) |
|
Year ended 7/31/06: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 50,583 | $ | 654,202 |
|
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 28,964 | | 374,873 |
|
| 79,547 | | 1,029,075 |
|
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (155,671) | (2,014,506) |
|
Net decrease | (76,124) | $ | (985,431) |
Note 5: Regulatory matters and litigation
In late 2003 and 2004, Putnam Management settled charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division (“MSD”) in connection with excessive short-term trading by certain former Putnam employees and, in the case of charges brought by the MSD, excessive short-term trading by participants in some Putnam-administered 401(k) plans. Putnam Management agreed to pay $193.5 million in penalties and restitution, of which $153.5 million will be distributed to certain open-end Putnam funds and their shareholders after the SEC and MSD approve a distribution plan being developed by an independent consultant. The allegations of the SEC and MSD and related matters have served as the general basis for certain lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits filed against Putnam Management and, in a limited number of cases, against some Putnam funds. Putnam Management believes th at these lawsuits will have no material adverse effect on the funds or on Putnam Management’s ability to provide investment management services. In addition, Putnam Management has agreed to bear any costs incurred by the Putnam funds as a result of these matters.
Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management are named as defendants in a civil suit in which the plaintiffs allege that the management and distribution fees paid by certain Putnam funds were excessive and seek recovery under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management have contested the plaintiffs’ claims and the matter is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Based on currently available information, Putnam Management believes that this action is without merit and that it is unlikely to have a material effect on Putnam Management’s and Putnam Retail Management’s ability to provide services to their clients, including the fund.
69
Note 6: New accounting pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (the “Interpretation”). The Interpretation prescribes a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken by a filer in the filer’s tax return. The Interpretation will become effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 but will also apply to tax positions reflected in the fund’s financial statements as of that date. No determination has been made whether the adoption of the Interpretation will require the fund to make any adjustments to its net assets or have any other effect on the fund’s financial statements. The effects of implementing this pr onouncement, if any, will be noted in the fund’s next semiannual financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (the “Standard”). The Standard defines fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The Standard applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards. The Standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Putnam Management is currently evaluating what impact the adoption of the Standard will have on the fund’s financial statements.
70
The Putnam
family of funds
The following is a list of Putnam’s open-end mutual funds offered to the public. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund before investing. For a prospectus containing this and other information for any Putnam fund or product, call your financial advisor at 1-800-225-1581 and ask for a prospectus. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.
Growth funds | Value funds |
Discovery Growth Fund | Classic Equity Fund |
Growth Opportunities Fund | Convertible Income-Growth Trust |
Health Sciences Trust | Equity Income Fund |
International New Opportunities Fund* | The George Putnam Fund of Boston |
New Opportunities Fund | The Putnam Fund for Growth |
OTC & Emerging Growth Fund | and Income |
Small Cap Growth Fund* | International Growth and Income Fund* |
Vista Fund | Mid Cap Value Fund |
Voyager Fund | New Value Fund |
| Small Cap Value Fund* |
|
Blend funds | Income funds |
Capital Appreciation Fund | American Government Income Fund |
Capital Opportunities Fund* | Diversified Income Trust |
Europe Equity Fund* | Floating Rate Income Fund |
Global Equity Fund* | Global Income Trust* |
Global Natural Resources Fund* | High Yield Advantage Fund* |
International Capital | High Yield Trust* |
Opportunities Fund* | Income Fund |
International Equity Fund* | Limited Duration Government |
Investors Fund | Income Fund |
Research Fund | Money Market Fund† |
Tax Smart Equity Fund® | U.S. Government Income Trust |
Utilities Growth and Income Fund | |
* A 1% redemption fee on total assets redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of purchase may be imposed for all share classes of these funds.
† An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.
71
Tax-free income funds | Putnam RetirementReady® Funds |
AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund | Putnam RetirementReady Funds — ten |
Tax Exempt Income Fund | investment portfolios that offer diversifica- |
Tax Exempt Money Market Fund§ | tion among stocks, bonds, and money |
Tax-Free High Yield Fund | market instruments and adjust to become |
| more conservative over time based on a |
State tax-free income funds: | target date for withdrawing assets. |
Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Michigan, | |
Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, | The ten funds: |
and Pennsylvania | Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund |
| Putnam RetirementReady 2045 Fund |
Asset allocation funds | Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund |
Income Strategies Fund | Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund |
| Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund |
Putnam Asset Allocation Funds — three | Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund |
investment portfolios that spread your | Putnam RetirementReady 2020 Fund |
money across a variety of stocks, bonds, | Putnam RetirementReady 2015 Fund |
and money market investments. | Putnam RetirementReady 2010 Fund |
| Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund |
The three portfolios: | |
Asset Allocation: Balanced Portfolio | |
Asset Allocation: Conservative Portfolio | |
Asset Allocation: Growth Portfolio | |
With the exception of money market funds, a 1% redemption fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase (90 days, for certain funds).
Check your account balances and the most recent month-end performance at www.putnam.com.
72
Fund information
Founded over 65 years ago, Putnam Investments was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We manage over 100 mutual funds in growth, value, blend, fixed income, and international.
Investment Manager | Officers | Francis J. McNamara, III |
Putnam Investment | George Putnam, III | Vice President and |
Management, LLC | President | Chief Legal Officer |
One Post Office Square | | |
Boston, MA 02109 | Charles E. Porter | Charles A. Ruys de Perez |
| Executive Vice President, | Vice President and |
Marketing Services | Principal Executive Officer, | Chief Compliance Officer |
Putnam Retail Management | Associate Treasurer and | |
One Post Office Square | Compliance Liaison | Mark C. Trenchard |
Boston, MA 02109 | | Vice President and |
| Jonathan S. Horwitz | BSA Compliance Officer |
Custodians | Senior Vice President | |
Putnam Fiduciary Trust | and Treasurer | Judith Cohen |
Company, State Street Bank | | Vice President, Clerk and |
and Trust Company | Steven D. Krichmar | Assistant Treasurer |
| Vice President and | |
Legal Counsel | Principal Financial Officer | Wanda M. McManus |
Ropes & Gray LLP | | Vice President, Senior Associate |
| Janet C. Smith | Treasurer and Assistant Clerk |
Trustees | Vice President, Principal | |
John A. Hill, Chairman | Accounting Officer and | Nancy E. Florek |
Jameson Adkins Baxter, | Assistant Treasurer | Vice President, Assistant Clerk, |
Vice Chairman | | Assistant Treasurer and |
Charles B. Curtis | Susan G. Malloy | Proxy Manager |
Myra R. Drucker | Vice President and | |
Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. | Assistant Treasurer | |
Paul L. Joskow | | |
Elizabeth T. Kennan | Beth S. Mazor | |
Kenneth R. Leibler | Vice President | |
Robert E. Patterson | | |
George Putnam, III | James P. Pappas | |
W. Thomas Stephens | Vice President | |
Richard B. Worley | | |
| Richard S. Robie, III | |
| Vice President | |
This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit www.putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.
Item 2. Code of Ethics:
Not applicable
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:
Not applicable
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:
Not applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments:
The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to shareholders in Item 1 above.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management Investment Companies:
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies
Not Applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers:
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
Not applicable
Item 11. Controls and Procedures:
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: Effective January 1, 2007, the fund retained State Street Bank and Trust Company ("State Street") as its custodian. Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company, the fund's previous custodian, is managing the transfer of the fund's assets to State Street. This transfer is expected to be completed for all Putnam funds during the first half of 2007, with PFTC remaining as custodian with respect to fund assets until the assets are transferred. Also effective January 1, 2007, the fund's investment manager, Putnam
Investment Management, LLC entered into a Master Sub-Accounting Services Agreement with State Street, under which the investment manager has delegated to State Street responsibility for providing certain administrative, pricing, and bookkeeping services for the fund.
Item 12. Exhibits:
(a)(1) Not applicable
(a)(2) Separate certifications for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Putnam Tax Free Income Trust
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 28, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Charles E. Porter
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer
Date: March 28, 2007
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer
Date: March 28, 2007