| | |
UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
FORM N-CSR |
|
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED |
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
| |
Investment Company Act file number: (811- 04345) | |
| |
Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: | Putnam Tax Free Income Trust |
|
Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
| |
Name and address of agent for service: | Beth S. Mazor, Vice President |
| One Post Office Square |
| Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
| |
Copy to: | John W. Gerstmayr, Esq. |
| Ropes & Gray LLP |
| One International Place |
| Boston, Massachusetts 02110 |
| |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | (617) 292-1000 |
| | |
Date of fiscal year end: July 31, 2008 | | |
|
Date of reporting period: August 1, 2007 — January 31, 2008 |
Item 1. Report to Stockholders:
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:
What makes Putnam different?
In 1830, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Samuel Putnam established The Prudent Man Rule, a legal foundation for responsible money management.
THE PRUDENT MAN RULE
All that can be required of a trustee to invest is that he shall conduct himself faithfully and exercise a sound discretion. He is to observe how men of prudence, discretion, and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the permanent disposition of their funds, considering the probable income, as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested.
A time-honored tradition in money management
Since 1937, our values have been rooted in a profound sense of responsibility for the money entrusted to us.
A prudent approach to investing
We use a research-driven team approach to seek consistent, dependable, superior investment results over time, although there is no guarantee a fund will meet its objectives.
Funds for every investment goal
We offer a broad range of mutual funds and other financial products so investors and their financial representatives can build diversified portfolios.
A commitment to doing what’s right for investors
With a focus on investment performance, below-average expenses, and in-depth information about our funds, we put the interests of investors first and seek to set the standard for integrity and service.
Industry-leading service
We help investors, along with their financial representatives, make informed investment decisions with confidence.
Putnam
AMT-Free Insured
Municipal Fund
1|31|08
Semiannual Report
| |
Message from the Trustees | 2 |
About the fund | 4 |
Performance snapshot | 6 |
Interview with your fund’s Portfolio Leader | 7 |
Performance in depth | 13 |
Expenses | 16 |
Portfolio turnover | 18 |
Risk | 19 |
Your fund’s management | 20 |
Terms and definitions | 22 |
Trustee approval of management contract | 24 |
Other information for shareholders | 30 |
Financial statements | 31 |
Cover photograph: © Richard H. Johnson
Message from the Trustees
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
In early 2008, financial markets face clear challenges. What began as a rise in defaults for a limited segment of the U.S. mortgage market has spread across the global financial sector and produced a significant tightening of credit conditions. Forecasts for global growth have been reduced as a result, and markets have reacted by sending stock prices lower. In the United States, the economy weakened sharply in late 2007, raising the chance of a recession this year. Fortunately, policymakers have taken action to stimulate growth: The Federal Reserve Board cut interest rates, and federal lawmakers, working with the president, approved a $168 billion fiscal stimulus plan.
As investors, it is natural to feel discouraged by disappointing short-term results. During these challenging times, it is important to remember the value of a long-term perspective and the counsel of your financial representative. The normal condition of the economy and corporate earnings is one of growth, albeit with occasional interruptions. As in the past, after a period of weakness the economy is likely to regain its momentum and produce the growth and corporate earnings that investors expect.
Starting this month, we have changed the portfolio manager’s commentary in this report to a question-and-answer format. We feel that this makes the information more readable and accessible, and we hope you think so as well.
2
Lastly, we note that Putnam Investments celebrated its 70th anniversary in November. From modest beginnings in Boston, Massachusetts, the company has grown into a global asset manager that serves millions of investors worldwide. Although the mutual fund industry has undergone many changes since George Putnam introduced his innovative balanced fund in 1937, Putnam’s guiding principles have not. As we celebrate this 70-year milestone, we look forward to Putnam continuing its long tradition of prudent money management. Thank you for your support of the Putnam funds.
Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund:
Seeking high current income free from federal taxes
Municipal bonds have long been popular investments because they provide income exempt from federal tax, though capital gains are taxable. Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund seeks income exempt from traditional income tax as well as from the federal alternative minimum tax, or AMT.
The AMT is a federal tax that operates in tandem with the regular income tax system. Taxpayers subject to the AMT must pay a larger amount in tax determined by AMT rules — and the difference can be thousands of dollars for many with household incomes above $150,000. It is estimated that by 2010, nearly every household with an income of $100,000 or more will be paying the AMT, unless the federal government changes the law.
If you are subject to the AMT, investments that could increase your tax liability include private-activity municipal bonds, which back development projects, including certain housing and resource recovery projects.
Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund aims to serve investors subject to the AMT. The fund seeks to avoid bonds whose income would be taxable under AMT rules, though income may be subject to state taxes.
The fund’s portfolio team of four professionals researches the municipal market to buy bonds that are not subject to the AMT. Pursuing the fund’s mandate, they also keep the fund invested in high-quality bonds, favoring bonds that are insured or carry AAA ratings, or whose payments are backed by U.S. Treasuries. The team’s goal is to provide an attractive level of income exempt from all federal taxes.
Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses. Tax-free funds may not be suitable for IRAs and other non-taxable accounts. Please consult your tax advisor for more information. Shares of this fund are not insured, and their prices will fluctuate with market conditions.
Understanding the AMT
The AMT is a separate, parallel federal income tax system, with two marginal tax rates, 26% and 28%, and different exemption amounts.
Under AMT rules, certain exclusions, exemptions, deductions, and credits that would reduce your regular taxable income are not allowed. You must “adjust” your regular taxable income to arrive at your alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI). Then, after subtracting your AMT exemption amount, if your AMT liability is greater than your regular tax liability, you must pay both your regular tax and the difference. It is important to understand that a higher level of income will not necessarily cause you to owe AMT. Rather, it is the relationship between your income and various trigger items, such as credits and deductions, that determines your AMT liability.
Managing this relationship can help avoid a costly surprise at tax time. Any number of items may trigger the tax, but large capital gains, personal exemptions, and deductions are the worst culprits.
From “class tax” to “mass tax”: By 2010, over 32 million
taxpayers may be subject to the AMT.
Performance snapshot
Putnam AMT-Free Insured
Municipal Fund
Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. Share price, principal value, and return will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance of class A shares assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Fund returns in the bar chart do not reflect a sales charge of 4.00%; had they, returns would have been lower.
See pages 13–15 for additional performance information. A 1% short-term trading fee may apply. To obtain the most recent month-end performance, visit www.putnam.com. Performance for class A shares prior to their inception (9/20/93) is derived from the historical performance of class B shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC).
* Returns for the six-month period are not annualized, but cumulative.
6
The period in review
Thalia, thanks for sitting down with us today to talk about Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund. Let’s start by discussing how the fund performed during the period.
For the six months ended January 31, 2008, the fund returned 3.60%, which was in line with its benchmark, the Lehman Municipal Bond Index. However, when compared to similar funds within its Lipper peer group, Insured Municipal Debt Funds, the fund ranked in the 12th percentile, meaning it outperformed 88% of similar funds for the period.
Given the complexity of the issues that roiled the markets and overall economy, it was an extraordinarily challenging period. With the yield curve steepening during the period, we had positioned the fund in favor of shorter-term bonds, and this helped relative fund performance when long-term yields rose. Our most successful holding during the period was in single-family housing bonds, with
Broad market index and fund performance
This comparison shows your fund’s performance in the context of broad market indexes for the six months ended 1/31/08. See page 6 and pages 13–15 for additional fund performance information. Index descriptions can be found on page 23.
7
their strict lending requirements that make borrowers less likely to default, while the fund’s exposure to zero-coupon bonds detracted from performance.
You mention the challenging nature of the past six months. Could you describe the credit market environment?
The credit markets experienced significant volatility over the past several months, as problems related to the crisis in subprime lending worsened. The result was a “liquidity scare.” The subprime mortgage financial crisis started in the United States in late 2006, and grew into a global financial crisis by the summer of 2007. Less stringent mortgage-lending practices in recent years resulted in rising debt for borrowers with weaker credit histories. When mortgage rates were extremely low and home values were rising, the situation was sustainable. But as interest rates rose in early 2007, delinquencies and foreclosures started to spike. Many homeowners were unable or unwilling to meet financial commitments, and many lenders were left without a means to recoup their losses. In past economic cycles, loan defaults have been limited, but the repackaging, securitization, and wide-scale distribution of subprime mortgage debt by U.S. inv estment banks caused the mortgage crisis to take on global proportions.
Credit quality overview
Credit qualities shown as a percentage of portfolio value as of 1/31/08. A bond rated Baa or higher (MIG3/VMIG3 or higher, for short-term debt) is considered investment grade. The chart reflects Moody’s ratings; percentages may include bonds not rated by Moody’s but considered by Putnam Management to be of comparable quality. Ratings will vary over time.
8
What impact has the subprime crisis had on the municipal bond market?
There have been growing concerns about the financial health of municipal bond insurers, such as MBIA Inc. and Ambac Financial Group, leading some debt investors to question their ability to maintain their AAA ratings. These companies provide insurance against defaults on bonds issued by municipalities. In recent years, however, these firms also began insuring increasingly complex securities backed by home mortgages. As a result, they have posted billions of dollars of losses related to the subprime crisis.
After the period’s close, both Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s downgraded municipal bond insurers FGIC Corp. and XL Capital Assurance Inc. to below AAA, leaving a portion of your fund’s holdings in non-AAA-rated securities. However, we have examined the underlying credits of these securities and are comfortable holding them.
Subprime mortgage crisis aside, how is the overall economy holding up?
There have been signs of an economic slowdown in recent months. As of this report, growth of U.S. GDP was estimated to be only 0.6% in the fourth quarter of 2007. Consumer spending, which plays a significant role in driving the U.S. economy, showed signs of a marked slowdown in December, before rebounding slightly in January. The
Comparison of the fund’s maturity and duration
This chart compares changes in the fund’s average effective maturity (a weighted average of the holdings’ maturities) and its average effective duration (a measure of its sensitivity to interest-rate changes).
Average effective duration and average effective maturity take into account put and call features, where applicable, and reflect prepayments for mortgage-backed securities. Duration is usually shorter than maturity because it reflects interest payments on a bond prior to its maturity.
9
prospect of weaker consumer spending, along with a slowdown in the service sector, points to the potential for a much weaker economy, and possibly a recession.
How have authorities responded to the liquidity squeeze and signs of an economic downturn?
Starting in September, the Federal Reserve began to cut its target federal funds rate. Citing concerns about risks to the economy, the Fed cut the rate on five occasions during the period. In all, the Fed reduced its target for the federal funds rate from 5.25% in August to 3.0% by the end of January, including a surprise 0.75% cut on January 22. In addition, Congress began work on an economic stimulus package that could pump an estimated $168 billion into the economy by late spring.
How have you positioned the fund to deal with these changing conditions?
Over the past couple of years, insured bonds with lower underlying ratings (BBB) generally yielded an additional 10 to 15 basis points more than the highest-quality AAA-rated bonds. We believed that these yields did not accurately compensate investors for the higher risks, and thus we favored bonds with stronger underlying credit ratings. As concerns about the financial health of municipal bond insurance companies grew over the past few months, bonds with lower underlying ratings suffered. In recent weeks, spreads on insured bonds with BBB underlying ratings have increased to more than 100 basis points, or 1%, versus insured bonds with AA underlying ratings. Therefore, the fund’s bias toward higher-rated bonds had a positive impact on its performance during the period.
As I mentioned earlier, concerns about insurers’ ability to make good on bond guarantees have dampened demand for municipal bonds, causing yields to rise. It’s important to note, however, that municipal bond defaults are extremely rare, so it’s possible that investors have overreacted to these perceived risks. As a result, we have added insured bonds with A and BBB underlying ratings, as spreads on these securities appear attractive.
How did the Fed’s interest-rate cuts affect your strategy?
Due to the Fed’s rate cuts, the yield curve — a graphical representation of how yields of comparable-quality bonds differ by maturity range — steepened. This means that yields on longer-term bonds grew in relation to yields on shorter-term bonds. Keep in mind that when bond yields rise, prices fall. We had positioned the fund’s holdings in favor of shorter-term bonds, and this had a positive impact on relative fund performance when long-term yields rose.
Were there any particular sectors that contributed to the fund’s performance?
We had success with single-family housing bonds. Borrowers under these
10
programs have to meet relatively strict lending requirements, making them far less likely than subprime borrowers to default. Shorter-term single-family housing bonds significantly outperformed long-term bonds when yields rose. On the longer end of the spectrum, we also invested in single-family housing bonds issued by the Mississippi Home Corporation. These bonds offer a relatively high coupon rate of 6.1% and mature in June 2038. We feel there is a good chance that mortgage prepayments may slow, given weakness in the housing market and the economy. If that happens, these bonds may perform well because of their attractive coupon rate.
What sectors detracted from the fund’s returns?
Zero-coupon municipal bonds under-performed during the period. As these bonds typically have underlying credit ratings of A or less, their yields rose when the market began to favor bonds with higher underlying credit ratings. Because zero-coupon bonds offer payment when they mature, rather than semiannual interest payments, they also tend to experience greater price fluctuations and are less liquid than bonds that trade with a coupon.
What is your outlook for the municipal bond market?
We believe that the yield curve may steepen further, either due to a rally in short-term bonds in response to additional Fed rate cuts or weakness in long-term bonds driven by inflation concerns. We have positioned the fund so that we have exposure to those portions of the yield curve that may perform better than others. Recently, that has led us to overweight shorter-term bonds.
I N V E S T M E N T I N S I G H T
An economic recession, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), is a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy and lasting more than a few months. The symptoms of this decline are normally visible in data that tracks income, employment, industrial production, and sales. Compared with expansions, most recessions are brief. The seven recessions since 1960 have lasted an average of 11 months, versus 64 months for the average expansion. Recessions, also defined as two consecutive quarters of contracting GDP, have become increasingly rare in recent decades, as the Fed has become more adept at avoiding them and as technology has enabled businesses to adjust more rapidly to changing market conditions.
11
The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management. They are not meant as investment advice.
Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses. Tax-free funds may not be suitable for IRAs and other non-taxable accounts. Shares of this fund are not insured, and their prices will fluctuate with market conditions.
Please note that the holdings discussed in this report may not have been held by the fund for the entire period. Portfolio composition is subject to review in accordance with the fund’s investment strategy and may vary in the future.
12
Your fund’s performance
This section shows your fund’s performance, price, and distribution information for periods ended January 31, 2008, the end of the first half of its current fiscal year. In accordance with regulatory requirements for mutual funds, we also include performance as of the most recent calendar quarter-end and expense information taken from the fund’s current prospectus. Performance should always be considered in light of a fund’s investment strategy. Data represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance information does not reflect any deduction for taxes a shareholder may owe on fund distributions or on the redemption of fund shares. For the most recent month-end performance, please visit the Individual Investors section of www.putnam.com or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581. Class Y shares are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs. See the Terms and Definitions section in this report for definitions of the share classes offered by your fund.
Fund performance
Total return for periods ended 1/31/08
| | | | | | | | | |
| Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class M | | Class Y |
(inception dates) | (9/20/93) | | (9/9/85) | | (7/26/99) | | (6/1/95) | | (1/2/08) |
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP | NAV |
|
Annual average | | | | | | | | | |
(life of fund) | 6.52% | 6.33% | 6.21% | 6.21% | 5.92% | 5.92% | 6.30% | 6.14% | 6.21% |
|
10 years | 53.76 | 47.62 | 46.80 | 46.80 | 41.93 | 41.93 | 49.73 | 44.86 | 46.91 |
Annual average | 4.40 | 3.97 | 3.91 | 3.91 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 4.12 | 3.78 | 3.92 |
|
5 years | 21.10 | 16.19 | 17.31 | 15.36 | 16.40 | 16.40 | 19.40 | 15.63 | 17.36 |
Annual average | 3.90 | 3.05 | 3.24 | 2.90 | 3.08 | 3.08 | 3.61 | 2.95 | 3.25 |
|
3 years | 10.12 | 5.69 | 8.03 | 5.10 | 7.58 | 7.58 | 9.18 | 5.70 | 8.10 |
Annual average | 3.27 | 1.86 | 2.61 | 1.67 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.97 | 1.87 | 2.63 |
|
1 year | 4.42 | 0.34 | 3.87 | –1.13 | 3.72 | 2.72 | 4.33 | 0.92 | 3.95 |
|
6 months | 3.60 | –0.52 | 3.36 | –1.64 | 3.32 | 2.32 | 3.59 | 0.23 | 3.44 |
|
Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. After sales charge returns (public offering price, or POP) for class A and M shares reflect a maximum 4.00% and 3.25% load, respectively, as of 1/2/08. Class B share returns reflect the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), which is 5% in the first year, declining to 1% in the sixth year, and is eliminated thereafter. Class C shares reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year and is eliminated thereafter. Class Y shares have no initial sales charge or CDSC. Performance for class A, C, M, and Y shares before their inception is derived from the historical performance of class B shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC) and, for class C shares, the higher operating expenses for such shares.
A 1% short-term trading fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase.
13
Comparative index returns
For periods ended 1/31/08
| | |
| | Lipper Insured |
| Lehman Municipal | Municipal Debt Funds |
| Bond Index | category average* |
|
Annual average | | |
(life of fund) | 7.40% | 6.70% |
|
10 years | 66.02 | 49.35 |
Annual average | 5.20 | 4.08 |
|
5 years | 25.30 | 18.78 |
Annual average | 4.61 | 3.49 |
|
3 years | 12.54 | 8.35 |
Annual average | 4.02 | 2.70 |
|
1 year | 4.93 | 2.63 |
|
6 months | 3.71 | 2.06 |
|
Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.
* Over the 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and life-of-fund periods ended 1/31/08, there were 52, 52, 49, 49, 44, and 7 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.
Fund performance as of most recent calendar quarter
Total return for periods ended 12/31/07
| | | | | | | | | |
| Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class M | | Class Y |
(inception dates) | (9/20/93) | | (9/9/85) | | (7/26/99) | | (6/1/95) | | (1/2/08) |
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP | NAV |
|
Annual average | | | | | | | | | |
(life of fund) | 6.50% | 6.31% | 6.18% | 6.18% | 5.90% | 5.90% | 6.27% | 6.12% | 6.19% |
|
10 years | 53.54 | 47.43 | 46.66 | 46.66 | 41.81 | 41.81 | 49.52 | 44.67 | 46.68 |
Annual average | 4.38 | 3.96 | 3.90 | 3.90 | 3.55 | 3.55 | 4.10 | 3.76 | 3.91 |
|
5 years | 19.34 | 14.47 | 15.50 | 13.58 | 14.72 | 14.72 | 17.63 | 13.81 | 15.49 |
Annual average | 3.60 | 2.74 | 2.92 | 2.58 | 2.78 | 2.78 | 3.30 | 2.62 | 2.92 |
|
3 years | 10.10 | 5.77 | 8.02 | 5.10 | 7.60 | 7.60 | 9.13 | 5.61 | 8.01 |
Annual average | 3.26 | 1.89 | 2.60 | 1.67 | 2.47 | 2.47 | 2.96 | 1.84 | 2.60 |
|
1 year | 3.02 | –1.03 | 2.42 | –2.53 | 2.35 | 1.36 | 2.87 | –0.49 | 2.42 |
|
6 months | 3.34 | –0.81 | 3.01 | –1.99 | 3.04 | 2.04 | 3.24 | –0.09 | 3.01 |
|
14
Fund price and distribution information
For the six-month period ended 1/31/08
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Distributions | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Number | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 |
|
Income1 | $0.285683 | $0.238572 | $0.227640 | $0.265072 | $0.050643 |
|
Capital gains2 | | | | | |
|
Long-term | 0.020000 | 0.020000 | 0.020000 | 0.020000 | — |
|
Short-term | — | — | — | — | — |
|
Total | $0.305683 | $0.258572 | $0.247640 | $0.285072 | $0.050643 |
|
Share value: | NAV | POP* | NAV | NAV | NAV | POP | NAV |
|
7/31/07 | $14.59 | $15.20 | $14.61 | $14.61 | $14.63 | $15.12 | — |
|
1/2/08† | — | — | — | — | — | — | $14.71 |
|
1/31/08 | 14.81 | 15.43 | 14.84 | 14.84 | 14.86 | 15.36 | 14.82 |
|
Current yield | | | | | |
(end of period) | | | | | |
|
Current dividend rate3 | 3.81% | 3.66% | 3.17% | 3.02% | 3.52% | 3.40% | 3.90% |
|
Taxable equivalent4 | 5.86 | 5.63 | 4.88 | 4.65 | 5.42 | 5.23 | 6.00 |
|
Current 30-day | | | | | |
SEC yield5,6 | N/A | 2.93 | 2.41 | 2.26 | N/A | 2.67 | 3.26 |
|
Taxable equivalent4 | N/A | 4.51 | 3.71 | 3.48 | N/A | 4.11 | 5.02 |
|
The classification of distributions, if any, is an estimate. Final distribution information will appear on your year-end tax forms.
* Reflects an increase in sales charges that took effect on 1/2/08.
† Inception date of class Y shares.
1 For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.
2 Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes.
3 Most recent distribution, excluding capital gains, annualized and divided by NAV or POP at end of period.
4 Assumes maximum 35% federal and state combined tax rate for 2008. Results for investors subject to lower tax rates would not be as advantageous.
5 For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which yields would have been lower.
6 Based only on investment income and calculated using the maximum offering price for each share class, in accordance with SEC guidelines.
Fund’s annual operating expenses
For the fiscal year ended 7/31/07
| | | | | |
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Total annual fund operating expenses | 0.85% | 1.49% | 1.64% | 1.14% | 0.64% |
|
Expense information in this table is taken from the most recent prospectus, is subject to change, and may differ from that shown in the next section and in the financial highlights of this report. Expenses are shown as a percentage of average net assets.
15
Your fund’s expenses
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees, distribution fees (12b-1 fees), and other expenses. In the most recent six-month period, your fund limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You may also pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial representative.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund from August 1, 2007, to January 31, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | | | |
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000* | $ 4.35 | $ 7.57 | $ 8.33 | $ 5.78 | $ 0.52 |
|
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,036.00 | $1,033.60 | $1,033.20 | $1,035.90 | $1,011.00 |
|
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 1/31/08 (except for Class Y shares, which is for the period January 2, 2008 (commencement of operations) to January 31, 2008). The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Estimate the expenses you paid
To estimate the ongoing expenses you paid for the six months ended January 31, 2008, use the calculation method below. To find the value of your investment on August 1, 2007, call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.
16
Compare expenses using the SEC’s method
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total costs) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | | | |
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000* | $ 4.32 | $ 7.51 | $ 8.26 | $ 5.74 | $ 0.52 |
|
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,020.86 | $1,017.70 | $1,016.94 | $1,019.46 | $1,003.58 |
|
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 1/31/08 (except for Class Y shares, which is for the period January 2, 2008 (commencement of operations) to January 31, 2008). The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Compare expenses using industry averages
You can also compare your fund’s expenses with the average of its peer group, as defined by Lipper, an independent fund-rating agency that ranks funds relative to others that Lipper considers to have similar investment styles or objectives. The expense ratio for each share class shown below indicates how much of your fund’s average net assets have been used to pay ongoing expenses during the period.
| | | | | |
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Your fund’s annualized | | | | | |
expense ratio* | 0.85% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.13% | 0.63% |
|
Average annualized expense | | | | | |
ratio for Lipper peer group† | 0.88% | 1.51% | 1.66% | 1.16% | 0.66% |
|
* For the fund’s most recent fiscal half year; may differ from expense ratios based on one-year data in the financial highlights.
† Putnam is committed to keeping fund expenses below the Lipper peer group average expense ratio and will limit fund expenses if they exceed the Lipper average. The Lipper average is a simple average of front-end load funds in the peer group that excludes 12b-1 fees as well as any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. To facilitate the comparison in this presentation, Putnam has adjusted the Lipper average to reflect the 12b-1 fees carried by each class of shares other than class Y shares, which do not incur 12b-1 fees. Investors should note that the other funds in the peer group may be significantly smaller or larger than the fund, and that an asset-weighted average would likely be lower than the simple average. Also, the fund and Lipper report expense data at different times and for different periods. The fund’s expense ratio shown here is annualized data for the mos t recent six-month period, while the quarterly updated Lipper average is based on the most recent fiscal year-end data available for the peer group funds as of 12/31/07.
17
Your fund’s portfolio turnover
Putnam funds are actively managed by teams of experts who buy and sell securities based on intensive analysis of companies, industries, economies, and markets. Portfolio turnover is a measure of how often a fund’s managers buy and sell securities for your fund. A portfolio turnover of 100%, for example, means that the managers sold and replaced securities valued at 100% of a fund’s average portfolio value within a given period. Funds with high turnover may be more likely to generate capital gains that must be distributed to shareholders as taxable income. High turnover may also cause a fund to pay more brokerage commissions and other transaction costs, which may detract from performance.
Funds that invest in bonds or other fixed-income instruments may have higher turnover than funds that invest only in stocks. Short-term bond funds tend to have higher turnover than longer-term bond funds, because shorter-term bonds will mature or be sold more frequently than longer-term bonds. You can use the table below to compare your fund’s turnover with the average turnover for funds in its Lipper category.
Turnover comparisons
Percentage of holdings that change every year
| | | | | |
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
|
Putnam AMT-Free Insured | | | | | |
Municipal Fund | 19% | 7% | 13% | 27% | 43% |
|
Lipper Insured Municipal Debt | | | | | |
Funds category average | 37% | 37% | 39% | 45% | 62% |
|
Turnover data for the fund is calculated based on the fund’s fiscal-year period, which ends on July 31. Turnover data for the fund’s Lipper category is calculated based on the average of the turnover of each fund in the category for its fiscal year ended during the indicated year. Fiscal years vary across funds in the Lipper category, which may limit the comparability of the fund’s portfolio turnover rate to the Lipper average. Comparative data for 2007 is based on information available as of 12/31/07.
18
Your fund’s risk
This risk comparison is designed to help you understand how your fund compares with other funds. The comparison utilizes a risk measure developed by Morningstar, an independent fund-rating agency. This risk measure is referred to as the fund’s Morningstar Risk.
Your fund’s Morningstar® Risk
Your fund’s Morningstar Risk is shown alongside that of the average fund in its Morningstar category. The risk bar broadens the comparison by translating the fund’s Morningstar Risk into a percentile, which is based on the fund’s ranking among all funds rated by Morningstar as of December 31, 2007. A higher Morningstar Risk generally indicates that a fund’s monthly returns have varied more widely.
Morningstar determines a fund’s Morningstar Risk by assessing variations in the fund’s monthly returns — with an emphasis on downside variations — over a 3-year period, if available. Those measures are weighted and averaged to produce the fund’s Morningstar Risk. The information shown is provided for the fund’s class A shares only; information for other classes may vary. Morningstar Risk is based on historical data and does not indicate future results. Morningstar does not purport to measure the risk associated with a current investment in a fund, either on an absolute basis or on a relative basis. Low Morningstar Risk does not mean that you cannot lose money on an investment in a fund. Copyright 2007 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete, or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.
19
Your fund’s management
Your fund is managed by the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt Fixed-Income Team. Thalia Meehan is the Portfolio Leader, and Paul Drury, Brad Libby, and Susan McCormack are Portfolio Members, of your fund. The Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members coordinate the team’s management of the fund.
For a complete listing of the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt Fixed-Income Team, including those who are not Portfolio Leaders or Portfolio Members of your fund, visit Putnam’s Individual Investors Web site at www.putnam.com.
Investment team fund ownership
The table below shows how much the fund’s current Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members have invested in the fund and in all Putnam mutual funds (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of January 31, 2008, and January 31, 2007.
Trustee and Putnam employee fund ownership
As of January 31, 2008, all of the Trustees of the Putnam funds owned fund shares. The table below shows the approximate value of investments in the fund and all Putnam funds as of that date by the Trustees and Putnam employees. These amounts include investments by the Trustees’ and employees’ immediate family members and investments through retirement and deferred compensation plans.
| | |
| | Total assets in |
| Assets in the fund | all Putnam funds |
|
Trustees | $52,000 | $ 90,000,000 |
|
Putnam employees | $65,000 | $669,000,000 |
|
20
Other Putnam funds managed by the Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members
Thalia Meehan is the Portfolio Leader, and Paul Drury, Brad Libby, and Susan McCormack are Portfolio Members, of Putnam’s open-end tax-exempt funds for the following states: Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The same group also manages Putnam Investment Grade Municipal Trust, Putnam Municipal Bond Fund, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, and Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund.
Paul Drury is the Portfolio Leader, and Brad Libby, Susan McCormack, and Thalia Meehan are Portfolio Members, of Putnam High Yield Municipal Trust, Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, and Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund.
Thalia Meehan, Paul Drury, Brad Libby, and Susan McCormack may also manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by Putnam Management or an affiliate.
21
Terms and definitions
Important terms
Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.
Net asset value (NAV) is the price, or value, of one share of a mutual fund, without a sales charge. NAVs fluctuate with market conditions. NAV is calculated by dividing the net assets of each class of shares by the number of outstanding shares in the class.
Public offering price (POP) is the price of a mutual fund share plus the maximum sales charge levied at the time of purchase. POP performance figures shown here assume the 4.00% maximum sales charge for class A shares and 3.25% for class M shares.
Contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) is generally a charge applied at the time of the redemption of class B or C shares and assumes redemption at the end of the period. Your fund’s class B CDSC declines from a 5% maximum during the first year to 1% during the sixth year. After the sixth year, the CDSC no longer applies. The CDSC for class C shares is 1% for one year after purchase.
Current yield is the annual rate of return earned from dividends or interest of an investment. Current yield is expressed as a percentage of the price of a security, fund share, or principal investment.
Share classes
Class A shares are generally subject to an initial sales charge and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).
Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.
Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.
Class M shares have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).
Class Y shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC, and carry no 12b-1 fee. They are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.
22
Comparative indexes
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.
Lehman Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of long-term fixed-rate investment-grade tax-exempt bonds.
Merrill Lynch 91-Day Treasury Bill Index is an unmanaged index that seeks to measure the performance of U.S. Treasury bills available in the marketplace.
S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.
Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Lipper is a third-party industry-ranking entity that ranks mutual funds. Its rankings do not reflect sales charges. Lipper rankings are based on total return at net asset value relative to other funds that have similar current investment styles or objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper may change a fund’s category assignment at its discretion. Lipper category averages reflect performance trends for funds within a category.
23
Trustee approval of management contract
General conclusions
The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to approve the continuance of your fund’s management contract with Putnam Investment Management (“Putnam Management”). In this regard, the Board of Trustees, with the assistance of its Contract Committee consisting solely of Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Putnam funds (the “Independent Trustees”), requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary under the circumstances. Over the course of several months ending in June 2007, the Contract Committee met several times to consider the information provided by Putnam Management and other information developed with the assistance of the Board’s independent counsel and independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key aspects of this information with all of the Independent Trustees. The Contract Committee recommended, and the Independent Trustees approved, the continuance of your fund’s management contract, effective July 1, 2007.
In addition, in anticipation of the sale of Putnam Investments to Great-West Lifeco, at a series of meetings ending in March 2007, the Trustees reviewed and approved new management and distribution arrangements to take effect upon the change of control. Shareholders of all funds approved the management contracts in May 2007, and the change of control transaction was completed on August 3, 2007. Upon the change of control, the management contracts that were approved by the Trustees in June 2007 automatically terminated and were replaced by new contracts that had been approved by shareholders. In connection with their review for the June 2007 continuance of the Putnam funds’ management contracts, the Trustees did not identify any facts or circumstances that would alter the substance of the conclusions and recommendations they made in their review of the contracts to take effect upon the change of control.
The Independent Trustees’ approval was based on the following conclusions:
• That the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing such services, and
• That this fee schedule represented an appropriate sharing between fund shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.
These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and were not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered these factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for your fund and the other Putnam funds are the result of many years of
24
review and discussion between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements in prior years.
Management fee schedules and categories; total expenses
The Trustees reviewed the management fee schedules in effect for all Putnam funds, including fee levels and breakpoints, and the assignment of funds to particular fee categories. In reviewing fees and expenses, the Trustees generally focused their attention on material changes in circumstances — for example, changes in a fund’s size or investment style, changes in Putnam Management’s operating costs or responsibilities, or changes in competitive practices in the mutual fund industry — that suggest that consideration of fee changes might be warranted. The Trustees concluded that the circumstances did not warrant changes to the management fee structure of your fund, which had been carefully developed over the years, re-examined on many occasions and adjusted where appropriate. The Trustees focused on two areas of particular interest, as discussed further below:
• Competitiveness. The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds, which indicated that, in a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc., your fund ranked in the 33rd percentile in management fees and in the 25th percentile in total expenses (less any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2006 (the first percentile being the least expensive funds and the 100th percentile being the most expensive funds). (Because the fund’s custom peer group is smaller than the fund’s broad Lipper Inc. peer group, this expense information may differ from the Lipper peer expense information found elsewhere in this report.) The Trustees noted that expense ratios for a number of Putnam funds, which show the percentage of fund assets used to pay for management and administrative services, distributio n (12b-1) fees and other expenses, had been increasing recently as a result of declining net assets and the natural operation of fee breakpoints.
The Trustees noted that the expense ratio increases described above were currently being controlled by expense limitations implemented in January 2004 and which Putnam Management had committed to maintain at least through 2007. In anticipation of the change of control of Putnam Investments, the Trustees requested, and received a commitment from Putnam Management and Great-West Lifeco, to extend this program through at least June 30, 2009. These expense limitations give effect to a commitment by Putnam Management that the expense ratio of each open-end fund would be no higher than the average expense ratio of the competitive funds included in the fund’s relevant Lipper universe (exclusive of any applicable 12b-1 charges in each case). The Trustees observed that this commitment to limit fund expenses has served shareholders well since its inception.
25
In order to ensure that the expenses of the Putnam funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards, the Trustees requested, and Putnam Management agreed, to extend for the twelve months beginning July 1, 2007, an additional expense limitation for certain funds at an amount equal to the average expense ratio (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) of a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper to correspond to the size of the fund. This additional expense limitation will be applied to those open-end funds that had above-average expense ratios (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) based on the custom peer group data for the period ended December 31, 2006. This additional expense limitation will not be applied to your fund because it had a below-average expense ratio relative to its custom peer group.
• Economies of scale. Your fund currently has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale, which means that the effective management fee rate of a fund (as a percentage of fund assets) declines as a fund grows in size and crosses specified asset thresholds. Conversely, as a fund shrinks in size — as has been the case for many Putnam funds in recent years — these breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. In recent years, the Trustees have examined the operation of the existing breakpoint structure during periods of both growth and decline in asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee schedules in effect for the funds represented an appropriate sharing of economies of scale at current asset levels. In reaching this conclusion, the Trustees considered the Contract C ommittee’s stated intent to continue to work with Putnam Management to plan for an eventual resumption in the growth of assets, and to consider the potential economies that might be produced under various growth assumptions.
In connection with their review of the management fees and total expenses of the Putnam funds, the Trustees also reviewed the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by Putnam Management and its affiliates from the relationship with the funds. This information included trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability with respect to the funds’ management contracts, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis.
Investment performance
The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management represented a major factor in the Trustees’ evaluation of the quality of services provided by Putnam Management under your fund’s management contract. The Trustees were assisted in their review of the Putnam funds’ investment process and performance by the work of the Investment Process Committee of the Trustees and the Investment Oversight Committees of the Trustees, which had met on a regular monthly basis with the funds’ portfolio teams throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment
26
process — as measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognized that this does not guarantee favorable investment results for every fund in every time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds.
The Trustees noted the satisfactory investment performance of many Putnam funds. They also noted the disappointing investment performance of certain funds in recent years and discussed with senior management of Putnam Management the factors contributing to such underperfor-mance and actions being taken to improve performance. The Trustees recognized that, in recent years, Putnam Management has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes and in the fund product line to address areas of underperformance. In particular, they noted the important contributions of Putnam Management’s leadership in attracting, retaining and supporting high-quality investment professionals and in systematically implementing an investment process that seeks to merge the best features of fundamental and quantitative analysis. The Trustees indicated their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the effectiveness of these changes and to evaluate whether additional changes to address areas of underperformance are warranted.
In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that your fund’s class A share cumulative total return performance at net asset value was in the following percentiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds) (compared using tax-adjusted performance to recognize the different federal income tax treatment for capital gains distributions and exempt-interest distributions) for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2007 (the first percentile being the best-performing funds and the 100th percentile being the worst-performing funds):
| | |
One-year period | Three-year period | Five-year period |
|
36th | 41st | 36th |
(Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods shown elsewhere in this report. Over the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2007, there were 60, 59 and 59 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group.* Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.)
* The percentile rankings for your fund’s class A share annualized total return performance in the Lipper Insured Municipal Debt Funds category for the one-, five-, and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2007, were 10%, 36%, and 29%, respectively. Over the one-, five-, and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2007, the fund ranked 5th out of 52, 18th out of 49, and 13th out of 44 funds, respectively. Note that this more recent information was not available when the Trustees approved the continuance of your fund’s management contract.
27
As a general matter, the Trustees concluded that cooperative efforts between the Trustees and Putnam Management represent the most effective way to address investment performance problems. The Trustees noted that investors in the Putnam funds have, in effect, placed their trust in the Putnam organization, under the oversight of the funds’ Trustees, to make appropriate decisions regarding the management of the funds. Based on the responsiveness of Putnam Management in the recent past to Trustee concerns about investment performance, the Trustees concluded that it is preferable to seek change within Putnam Management to address performance shortcomings. In the Trustees’ view, the alternative of terminating a management contract and engaging a new investment adviser for an underperforming fund would entail significant disruptions and would not provide any greater assurance of improved investment performance.
Brokerage and soft-dollar allocations; other benefits
The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under the management contract with your fund. These include benefits related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research services that may be useful to Putnam Management in managing the assets of the fund and of other clients. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with the allocation of fund brokerage to ensure that the principle of seeking “best price and execution” remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
The Trustees’ annual review of your fund’s management contract also included the review of its distributor’s contract and distribution plan with Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership and the custodian agreement and investor servicing agreement with Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), each of which provides benefits to affiliates of Putnam Management. In the case of the custodian agreement, the Trustees considered that, effective January 1, 2007, the Putnam funds had engaged State Street Bank and Trust Company as custodian and began to transition the responsibility for providing custody services away from PFTC.
Comparison of retail and institutional fee schedules
The information examined by the Trustees as part of their annual contract review has included for many years information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit pension plans, college endowments, etc. This information included comparison of such fees with fees charged to the funds, as well as a detailed assessment of the differences in the services provided to these two types of clients. The Trustees observed, in this regard, that the differences in fee rates between institutional clients and the funds are by no means uniform when examined by individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of investment management services to these types of clients
28
reflect to a substantial degree historical competitive forces operating in separate market places. The Trustees considered the fact that fee rates across all asset sectors are higher on average for funds than for institutional clients, as well as the differences between the services that Putnam Management provides to the Putnam funds and those that it provides to institutional clients of the firm, but did not rely on such comparisons to any significant extent in concluding that the management fees paid by your fund are reasonable.
29
Other information for shareholders
Important notice regarding delivery of shareholder documents
In accordance with SEC regulations, Putnam sends a single copy of annual and semiannual shareholder reports, prospectuses, and proxy statements to Putnam shareholders who share the same address, unless a shareholder requests otherwise. If you prefer to receive your own copy of these documents, please call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581, and Putnam will begin sending individual copies within 30 days.
Proxy voting
Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests of our shareholders. The Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2007, are available on the Putnam Individual Investor Web site, www.putnam.com/individual, and on the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC’s Web site, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by calling Putnam’s Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund portfolio holdings
The fund will file a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC’s Web site or the operation of the Public Reference Room.
30
Financial statements
A guide to financial statements
These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes, constitute the fund’s financial statements.
The fund’s portfolio lists all the fund’s investments and their values as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of concentration and diversification.
Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and noninvestment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets includes the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)
Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings — from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal period.
Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund’s net assets were affected by the fund’s net investment gain or loss, by distributions to shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund’s shares. It lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the one in which they were earned. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. Actual results may vary. Any non-taxable return of capital cannot be determined until final tax calculations are completed after the end of the fund’s fiscal year.
Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund’s investment results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting the five most recent reporting periods. In a semiannual report, the highlight table also includes the current reporting period.
31
The fund’s portfolio 1/31/08 (Unaudited)
| | | | | |
|
Key to abbreviations | | | | | |
AMBAC AMBAC Indemnity Corporation | FSA Financial Security Assurance | |
COP Certificate of Participation | GNMA Coll. Government National Mortgage |
FGIC Financial Guaranty Insurance Company | Association Collateralized | | |
FHA Insd. Federal Housing Administration Insured | G.O. Bonds General Obligation Bonds | |
FHLMC Coll. Federal Home Loan Mortgage | MBIA MBIA Insurance Company | |
Corporation Collateralized | PSFG Permanent School Fund Guaranteed |
FNMA Coll. Federal National Mortgage | U.S. Govt. Coll. U.S. Government Collateralized |
Association Collateralized | VRDN Variable Rate Demand Notes | |
FRN Floating Rate Notes | XLCA XL Capital Assurance | | |
|
|
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (101.5%)* | | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Alabama (1.1%) | | | | | |
AL Hsg. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Single | | | | | |
Fam. Mtge.) | | | | | |
Ser. A-1, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
6.05s, 4/1/17 | Aaa | $ | 375,000 | $ | 380,044 |
Ser. G, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., FHLMC | | | | | |
Coll., 5 1/2s, 10/1/37 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,140,280 |
| | | | | 3,520,324 |
|
|
Alaska (2.0%) | | | | | |
AK State Hsg. Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, 4.4s, 12/1/31 | Aaa | | 2,530,000 | | 2,558,260 |
Anchorage, G.O. Bonds, Ser. D, AMBAC, | | | | | |
5s, 8/1/25 | Aaa | | 3,420,000 | | 3,602,183 |
| | | | | 6,160,443 |
|
|
Arkansas (1.1%) | | | | | |
Fayetteville, Sales & Use Tax Cap. Impt. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, FSA, 4s, 11/1/21 | Aaa | | 740,000 | | 752,536 |
Springdale, Sales & Use Tax Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
FSA, 4.2s, 7/1/24 | Aaa | | 2,500,000 | | 2,556,450 |
| | | | | 3,308,986 |
|
|
California (14.2%) | | | | | |
Beaumont, Fin. Auth. Local Agcy. Special | | | | | |
Tax Bonds, Ser. C, AMBAC, 4 3/4s, 9/1/28 | Aaa | | 2,370,000 | | 2,354,524 |
CA State Pub. Wks. Board Rev. Bonds (Dept. | | | | | |
Hlth. Svcs. Richmond Laboratory), Ser. B, | | | | | |
XLCA, 5s, 11/1/23 | Aaa | | 2,445,000 | | 2,515,929 |
Chino Basin, Regl. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Inland Empire Util. Agcy.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
AMBAC, 5s, 11/1/33 ## | Aaa | | 2,000,000 | | 2,032,240 |
32
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (101.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
California continued | | | | | |
Garvey, School Dist. G.O. Bonds (Election | | | | | |
of 2004), FSA | | | | | |
zero %, 8/1/26 | Aaa | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 408,590 |
zero %, 8/1/25 | Aaa | | 1,475,000 | | 640,180 |
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Tobacco Settlement), Ser. B, | | | | | |
AMBAC, FHLMC Coll., FNMA Coll., 5s, | | | | | |
6/1/38 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 2,475,000 | | 2,725,668 |
Grossmont-Cuyamaca, Cmnty. College Dist. | | | | | |
G.O. Bonds (Election of 2002), Ser. B, | | | | | |
FGIC, zero %, 8/1/17 | Aaa | | 2,100,000 | | 1,440,789 |
Los Angeles, Unified School Dist. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds (Election of 2004), Ser. C, FGIC, | | | | | |
5s, 7/1/26 | Aaa | | 2,745,000 | | 2,854,608 |
Merced, City School Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(Election of 2003), MBIA | | | | | |
zero %, 8/1/25 ## | AAA | | 1,190,000 | | 503,418 |
zero %, 8/1/24 ## | AAA | | 1,125,000 | | 505,586 |
zero %, 8/1/23 ## | AAA | | 1,065,000 | | 508,516 |
zero %, 8/1/22 ## | AAA | | 1,010,000 | | 512,312 |
Norwalk-La Mirada, Unified School Dist. | | | | | |
G.O. Bonds, Ser. B, FGIC, zero %, 8/1/21 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 2,693,150 |
Sacramento, City Fin. Auth. Tax Alloc. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, FGIC, zero %, 12/1/21 | Aaa | | 5,500,000 | | 2,705,230 |
Sacramento, Muni. Util. Dist. Fin. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Cosumnes), MBIA, 5s, 7/1/19 ## | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,084,840 |
(Cosumnes), MBIA, 5s, 7/1/18 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 4,149,880 |
San Diego Cnty., Wtr. Auth. COP, FGIC, | | | | | |
5.681s, 4/23/08 | Aaa | | 7,000,000 | | 7,052,780 |
San Diego, Unified School Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(Election of 1998), Ser. E, FSA, 5 1/4s, | | | | | |
7/1/19 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 2,000,000 | | 2,243,180 |
Santa Ana, Fin. Auth. Lease Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Police Admin. & Hldg. Fac.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
MBIA, 6 1/4s, 7/1/17 | Aaa | | 3,680,000 | | 4,455,376 |
| | | | | 43,386,796 |
|
|
Colorado (1.7%) | | | | | |
Adams & Arapahoe Cntys., Joint School | | | | | |
Dist. G.O. Bonds (No. 28J Aurora), | | | | | |
Ser. A, FSA, 5 1/4s, 12/1/18 | Aaa | | 4,140,000 | | 4,555,035 |
CO Edl. & Cultural Fac. Auth. VRDN | | | | | |
(National Jewish Federation Bond), | | | | | |
Ser. A1, 1.9s, 9/1/33 | VMIG1 | | 760,000 | | 760,000 |
| | | | | 5,315,035 |
33
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (101.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Florida (10.8%) | | | | | |
Fleming Island, Plantation Cmnty. Dev. | | | | | |
Dist. Special Assmt. Bonds, MBIA, | | | | | |
4 1/2s, 5/1/31 | Aaa | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 956,840 |
Hernando Cnty., Rev. Bonds (Criminal | | | | | |
Justice Complex Fin.), FGIC, 7.65s, 7/1/16 | Aaa | | 13,675,000 | | 17,845,875 |
Jacksonville, Sales Tax Rev. Bonds, AMBAC, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 10/1/17 | Aaa | | 2,500,000 | | 2,725,625 |
Orlando & Orange Cnty., Expressway Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, FGIC, 8 1/4s, 7/1/14 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 6,455,050 |
Sumter Cnty., School Dist. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Multi-Dist. Loan Program), FSA, | | | | | |
7.15s, 11/1/15 | Aaa | | 3,935,000 | | 5,014,489 |
| | | | | 32,997,879 |
|
|
Georgia (2.0%) | | | | | |
Atlanta, Wtr. & Waste Wtr. VRDN, Ser. C, | | | | | |
FSA, 2s, 11/1/41 | VMIG1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
Fulton Cnty., Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Klaus | | | | | |
Pkg. & Fam. Hsg. Project), MBIA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 11/1/20 | Aaa | | 3,360,000 | | 3,634,075 |
GA Muni. Elec. Pwr. Auth. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. Y, AMBAC, U.S. Govt. Coll., 6.4s, | | | | | |
1/1/13 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 415,000 | | 466,680 |
| | | | | 6,100,755 |
|
|
Idaho (0.1%) | | | | | |
ID Hlth. Fac. Auth. VRDN (St. Lukes Med. | | | | | |
Ctr.), FSA, 1.88s, 7/1/30 | VMIG1 | | 375,000 | | 375,000 |
|
|
Illinois (9.6%) | | | | | |
Chicago, G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, | | | | | |
5 5/8s, 1/1/39 | Aaa | | 155,000 | | 169,393 |
Chicago, Board of Ed. G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
MBIA, 5 1/4s, 12/1/19 | Aaa | | 1,500,000 | | 1,614,780 |
Chicago, Board of Ed. VRDN, Ser. C-1, FSA, | | | | | |
1.8s, 3/1/31 | VMIG1 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Chicago, O’Hare Intl. Arpt. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, FSA, 5s, 1/1/33 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,113,500 |
Cicero, G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, XLCA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 1/1/21 | Aaa | | 2,250,000 | | 2,420,978 |
Du Page Cnty., Cmnty. High School Dist. | | | | | |
G.O. Bonds (Dist. No. 108 — Lake Park), | | | | | |
FSA, 5.6s, 1/1/20 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,092,930 |
IL G.O. Bonds, Ser. 1, MBIA, 5 1/4s, 10/1/19 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,374,900 |
IL State Toll Hwy. Auth. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A-1, FSA, 5s, 1/1/22 | Aaa | | 2,500,000 | | 2,687,975 |
34
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (101.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Illinois continued | | | | | |
Regl. Trans. Auth. Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
AMBAC, 8s, 6/1/17 | Aaa | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 6,725,150 |
Will Cnty., School Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 122 New Lenox), Ser. B, FSA, | | | | | |
zero %, 11/1/21 | Aaa | | 5,590,000 | | 3,086,574 |
| | | | | 29,286,180 |
|
|
Indiana (6.6%) | | | | | |
Anderson, Indpt. School Bldg. Corp. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds (First Mtg.), FSA, 5 1/2s, 1/15/28 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,655,000 | | 1,907,305 |
Ball State U. Rev. Bonds (Student Fee), | | | | | |
Ser. N, FSA, 5s, 7/1/26 | Aaa | | 2,090,000 | | 2,206,915 |
Center Grove, Ind. Bldg. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(First Mtg.) | | | | | |
AMBAC, 5 1/2s, 1/15/26 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 6,605,000 | | 7,268,736 |
FGIC, 5s, 7/15/25 | Aaa | | 1,345,000 | | 1,398,518 |
IN Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Supply Syst. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, 5s, 1/1/20 | Aaa | | 5,695,000 | | 6,117,455 |
IN State Hsg. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Single Family Mtge.), Ser. A-1, GNMA | | | | | |
Coll., FNMA Coll. | | | | | |
4.2s, 7/1/17 | Aaa | | 240,000 | | 241,063 |
4.15s, 7/1/16 | Aaa | | 350,000 | | 352,930 |
4.1s, 7/1/15 | Aaa | | 110,000 | | 111,420 |
3.95s, 7/1/14 | Aaa | | 335,000 | | 339,345 |
3.9s, 1/1/14 | Aaa | | 235,000 | | 237,218 |
| | | | | 20,180,905 |
|
|
Louisiana (3.7%) | | | | | |
Ernest N. Morial-New Orleans Exhibit Hall | | | | | |
Auth. Special Tax, AMBAC, 5s, 7/15/20 | AAA | | 5,730,000 | | 5,964,529 |
LA Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 6/1/19 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,212,460 |
Lafayette, Pub. Pwr. Auth. Elec. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, MBIA, 5s, 11/1/32 | Aaa | | 2,000,000 | | 2,055,760 |
| | | | | 11,232,749 |
|
|
Massachusetts (1.3%) | | | | | |
MA State Special Oblig. Dedicated Tax Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, FGIC, FHLMC Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 1/1/23 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,124,370 |
MA State Tpk. Auth. Hwy. Syst. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, MBIA, 5s, 1/1/37 | Aaa | | 2,805,000 | | 2,805,365 |
| | | | | 3,929,735 |
35
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (101.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Michigan (9.4%) | | | | | |
Detroit, City School Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(School Bldg. & Site Impt.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
FGIC, 5s, 5/1/25 | Aaa | $ | 7,990,000 | $ | 8,129,266 |
Detroit, Swr. Disp. FRN, Ser. D, FSA, | | | | | |
3.768s, 7/1/32 | Aaa | | 1,100,000 | | 842,490 |
Detroit, Swr. Disp. VRDN, Ser. B, FSA, | | | | | |
2s, 7/1/33 | VMIG1 | | 3,100,000 | | 3,100,000 |
Detroit, Wtr. Supply Syst. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. B, FGIC, 5 1/4s, 7/1/20 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 720,000 | | 785,714 |
Kent, Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Spectrum Hlth. Care), Ser. A, MBIA, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 1/15/17 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 500,000 | | 553,965 |
MI Muni. Board Auth. Rev. Bonds (Clean | | | | | |
Wtr. Revolving Fund), 5s, 10/1/25 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,060,480 |
MI State Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Mercy Hlth.), Ser. X, MBIA | | | | | |
6s, 8/15/34 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,350,000 | | 3,577,331 |
6s, 8/15/34 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,650,000 | | 1,761,969 |
MI State Strategic Fund, Ltd. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Detroit Edison Co.), AMBAC | | | | | |
7s, 5/1/21 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 5,137,640 |
4.85s, 9/1/30 | Aaa | | 3,500,000 | | 3,744,685 |
| | | | | 28,693,540 |
|
|
Mississippi (0.9%) | | | | | |
MS Home Corp. Rev. Bonds (Single Fam. | | | | | |
Mtge.), Ser. D-1, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
6.1s, 6/1/38 | Aaa | | 2,500,000 | | 2,713,875 |
|
|
Missouri (0.9%) | | | | | |
Jackson Cnty., Special Oblig. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Harry S. Truman Sports Complex), AMBAC, | | | | | |
5s, 12/1/22 | Aaa | | 1,285,000 | | 1,369,823 |
MO State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. VRDN (SSM | | | | | |
Hlth. Care), Ser. C-1, FSA, 2s, 6/1/19 | A-1+ | | 1,300,000 | | 1,300,000 |
| | | | | 2,669,823 |
|
|
Nevada (2.4%) | | | | | |
Clark Cnty., School Dist. VRDN, Ser. A, | | | | | |
FSA, 1.7s, 6/15/21 | VMIG1 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
Washoe Cnty., G.O. Bonds, FGIC, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 5/1/18 | Aaa | | 2,040,000 | | 2,219,051 |
| | | | | 7,219,051 |
|
|
New Hampshire (0.4%) | | | | | |
NH Muni. Bond Bank Rev. Bonds, Ser. C, | | | | | |
MBIA, 5s, 3/15/25 | Aaa | | 1,195,000 | | 1,257,702 |
36
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (101.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
New Jersey (6.0%) | | | | | |
NJ Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(School Fac. Construction), Ser. F, FGIC, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 6/15/21 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | $ | 10,000,000 | $ | 11,232,600 |
(Motor Vehicle), Ser. A, MBIA, 5s, 7/1/27 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,118,000 |
NJ State Rev. Bonds (Trans. Syst.), | | | | | |
Ser. C, AMBAC, zero %, 12/15/24 | Aaa | | 4,800,000 | | 2,136,048 |
| | | | | 18,486,648 |
|
|
New York (6.4%) | | | | | |
Nassau Cnty., Hlth. Care Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Nassau Hlth. Care Corp.), FSA | | | | | |
6s, 8/1/13 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 4,610,000 | | 4,964,417 |
6s, 8/1/12 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 2,285,000 | | 2,460,671 |
NY City, Hsg. Dev. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, FGIC, 5s, 7/1/25 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,043,950 |
NY City, Muni. Wtr. & Swr. Fin. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. B, AMBAC, 5s, 6/15/28 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,114,450 |
NY State Dorm. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Brooklyn | | | | | |
Law School), Ser. B, XLCA | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 7/1/22 | Aaa | | 2,270,000 | | 2,443,133 |
5 3/8s, 7/1/20 | Aaa | | 2,215,000 | | 2,407,616 |
Sales Tax Asset Receivable Corp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, AMBAC, 5s, 10/15/29 | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,129,720 |
| | | | | 19,563,957 |
|
|
North Carolina (2.6%) | | | | | |
NC State Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 1, Catawba Elec.), Ser. A, MBIA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 1/1/19 | Aaa | | 7,500,000 | | 7,899,900 |
|
|
Ohio (0.5%) | | | | | |
Morley Library Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(Lake Cnty. Dist. Library), AMBAC, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 12/1/19 | Aaa | | 1,535,000 | | 1,651,046 |
OH Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Single Fam. Mtge. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. 85-A, FGIC, FHA Insd., | | | | | |
zero %, 1/15/15 | Aaa | | 45,000 | | 22,812 |
| | | | | 1,673,858 |
|
|
Oklahoma (1.1%) | | | | | |
OK City Arpt. Trust Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, | | | | | |
FSA, 5 1/4s, 7/1/21 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,207,360 |
|
|
Pennsylvania (1.6%) | | | | | |
Erie Cnty., Convention Ctr. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Convention Ctr. Hotel), FGIC, | | | | | |
5s, 1/15/22 | Aaa | | 1,415,000 | | 1,483,415 |
PA State Pub. School Bldg. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Philadelphia School Dist.), FSA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 6/1/25 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,000,000 | | 3,367,290 |
|
| | | | | 4,850,705 |
37
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (101.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
South Dakota (0.4%) | | | | | |
SD Hsg. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Home | | | | | |
Ownership Mtge.), Ser. J, 4.6s, 5/1/19 | Aa1 | $ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,290,175 |
|
|
Texas (6.4%) | | | | | |
Dallas, Indpt. School Dist. G.O. Bonds, | | | | | |
PSFG, 5 1/4s, 2/15/19 | Aaa | | 2,500,000 | | 2,669,775 |
Harris Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. VRDN | | | | | |
(TX Med. Ctr.), Ser. B, FSA, 1.9s, 5/15/29 | VMIG1 | | 900,000 | | 900,000 |
Hays Cnty., G.O. Bonds, FSA, 5s, 8/15/24 | Aaa | | 1,190,000 | | 1,247,310 |
Houston, Arpt. Syst. Rev. Bonds, FSA, | | | | | |
5s, 7/1/21 | Aaa | | 5,280,000 | | 5,484,652 |
Laredo, I S D Pub. Fac. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. C, AMBAC, 5s, 8/1/29 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,015,010 |
Mission Cons., Indpt. School Dist. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds, PSFG, 5s, 2/15/23 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 1,063,130 |
Nacogdoches, Indpt. School Dist. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds, PSFG, 5 1/2s, 2/15/15 | Aaa | | 140,000 | | 151,322 |
San Antonio Wtr. Rev. Bonds, FSA, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 5/15/20 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 4,427,280 |
Waco, Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. Mtge. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Hillcrest Hlth. Care Syst.), | | | | | |
Ser. A, MBIA, FHA Insd., 5s, 8/1/31 | Aaa | | 2,600,000 | | 2,603,536 |
| | | | | 19,562,015 |
|
|
Utah (2.7%) | | | | | |
Intermountain Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, MBIA, U.S. Govt. Coll., 6.15s, | | | | | |
7/1/14 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 7,790,000 | | 8,129,800 |
|
|
Virginia (1.4%) | | | | | |
VA State Res. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Clean Wtr. | | | | | |
Revolving Fund), 4 3/4s, 10/1/27 | Aaa | | 4,000,000 | | 4,121,640 |
|
|
Washington (2.5%) | | | | | |
WA State Pub. Pwr. Supply Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Nuclear No. 3), Ser. B, MBIA, 7 1/8s, 7/1/16 | Aaa | | 6,000,000 | | 7,536,900 |
|
|
West Virginia (1.7%) | | | | | |
Econ. Dev. Auth. Lease Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Correctional Juvenile Safety), Ser. A, | | | | | |
MBIA, 5s, 6/1/29 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 5,144,250 |
|
|
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS | | | | | |
|
Total investments (cost $293,483,530) | | | | $ | 309,815,986 |
38
* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $305,165,367.
** The Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s ratings indicated are believed to be the most recent ratings available at January 31, 2008 for the securities listed. Ratings are generally ascribed to securities at the time of issuance. While the agencies may from time to time revise such ratings, they undertake no obligation to do so, and the ratings do not necessarily represent what the agencies would ascribe to these securities at January 31, 2008. Securities rated by Putnam are indicated by “/P.” Securities rated by Fitch are indicated by “/F.” Ratings are not covered by the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Security ratings are defined in the Statement of Additional Information.
## Forward commitments, in part or in entirety (Note 1).
The rates shown on VRDN and FRN are the current interest rates at January 31, 2008.
At January 31, 2008, liquid assets totaling $10,030,383 have been designated as collateral for open forward commitments and futures contracts.
The fund had the following sector concentrations greater than 10% at January 31, 2008 (as a percentage of net assets):
| | |
| |
Local government | 30.5% | |
Utilities | 25.2 | |
State government | 11.2 | |
| |
The fund had the following insurance concentrations greater than 10% at January 31, 2008 (as a percentage of net assets): | |
| | |
MBIA | 24.2% | |
FSA | 23.6 | |
FGIC | 22.4 | |
AMBAC | 21.2 | |
| | | | | | | |
FUTURES CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING at 1/31/08 (Unaudited) | | | | |
|
|
| | Number of | | | | Expiration | Unrealized |
| | contracts | | Value | | date | appreciation |
|
U.S. Treasury Note 10 yr (Long) | | 25 | | $2,917,969 | | Mar-08 | $5,814 |
|
|
|
TOTAL RETURN SWAP CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING at 1/31/08 (Unaudited) | | | |
|
|
| | Fixed payments | Total return | Unrealized |
Swap counterparty / | Termination | received (paid) by | received by | appreciation/ |
Notional amount | date | fund per annum | or paid by fund | (depreciation) |
|
Goldman Sachs International | | | | | | | |
$1,800,000 | 2/28/08 | — | | 4.147% minus | $129,800 |
| | | | Municipal Market | |
| | | | Data Index AAA | |
| | | | municipal yields | |
| | | | 10 Year rate | |
|
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. | | | | | | | |
2,000,000 | 4/15/08 | — | | 4.17% minus | (41,440) |
| | | | Municipal Market | |
| | | | Data Index AAA | |
| | | | municipal yields | |
| | | | 10 Year rate | |
|
1,800,000 | 2/29/08 | — | | 4.27% minus | 109,315 |
| | | | Lehman Brothers | |
| | | | Municipal Swap | |
| | | | Index | | | |
|
|
Total | | | | | | | $197,675 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
39
Statement of assets and liabilities 1/31/08 (Unaudited)
| |
ASSETS | |
|
Investment in securities, at value (Note 1): | |
Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $293,483,530) | $309,815,986 |
|
Interest and other receivables | 2,612,288 |
|
Receivable for shares of the fund sold | 462,084 |
|
Receivable for securities sold | 9,737,095 |
|
Receivable from Manager (Note 2) | 31,509 |
|
Unrealized appreciation on swap contracts (Note 1) | 239,115 |
|
Receivable for variation margin (Note 1) | 19,077 |
|
Receivable for closed swap contracts (Note 1) | 88,303 |
|
Total assets | 323,005,457 |
|
|
LIABILITIES | |
|
Payable to custodian (Note 2) | 9,650,906 |
|
Distributions payable to shareholders | 279,460 |
|
Payable for purchases of delayed delivery securities (Note 1) | 7,112,414 |
|
Payable for shares of the fund repurchased | 260,678 |
|
Payable for compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 256,435 |
|
Payable for investor servicing (Note 2) | 5,127 |
|
Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 94,081 |
|
Payable for administrative services (Note 2) | 1,403 |
|
Payable for distribution fees (Note 2) | 76,208 |
|
Unrealized depreciation on swap contracts (Note 1) | 41,440 |
|
Other accrued expenses | 61,938 |
|
Total liabilities | 17,840,090 |
|
Net assets | $305,165,367 |
|
|
REPRESENTED BY | |
|
Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized) (Notes 1 and 4) | $289,687,652 |
|
Undistributed net investment income (Note 1) | 236,731 |
|
Accumulated net realized loss on investments (Note 1) | (1,294,961) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | 16,535,945 |
|
Total — Representing net assets applicable to capital shares outstanding | $305,165,367 |
(Continued on next page)
40
Statement of assets and liabilities (Continued)
| |
COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE | |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per class A share | |
($266,827,443 divided by 18,010,707 shares) | $14.81 |
|
Offering price per class A share | |
(100/96.00 of $14.81)* | $15.43 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class B share | |
($28,514,417 divided by 1,922,026 shares)** | $14.84 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class C share | |
($8,579,875 divided by 578,082 shares)** | $14.84 |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per class M share | |
($1,233,525 divided by 83,030 shares) | $14.86 |
|
Offering price per class M share | |
(100/96.75 of $14.86)*** | $15.36 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class Y share | |
($10,107 divided by 682 shares) | $14.82 |
* On single retail sales of less than $100,000. On sales of $100,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
** Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.
*** On single retail sales of less than $50,000. On sales of $50,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
41
Statement of operations Six months ended 1/31/08 (Unaudited)
| |
INTEREST INCOME | $ 6,994,706 |
|
|
EXPENSES | |
|
Compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 752,328 |
|
Investor servicing fees (Note 2) | 90,114 |
|
Custodian fees (Note 2) | 6,321 |
|
Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 15,124 |
|
Administrative services (Note 2) | 8,241 |
|
Distribution fees — Class A (Note 2) | 274,462 |
|
Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2) | 130,872 |
|
Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2) | 41,345 |
|
Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2) | 2,769 |
|
Other | 75,976 |
|
Non-recurring costs (Notes 2 and 5) | 505 |
|
Costs assumed by Manager (Notes 2 and 5) | (505) |
|
Total expenses | 1,397,552 |
|
Expense reduction (Note 2) | (53,936) |
|
Net expenses | 1,343,616 |
|
Net investment income | 5,651,090 |
|
Net realized gain on investments (Notes 1 and 3) | 49,435 |
|
Net realized gain on swap contracts (Note 1) | 17,357 |
|
Net realized gain on futures contracts (Note 1) | 59,797 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments, futures | |
contracts, and swap contracts during the period | 4,942,481 |
|
Net gain on investments | 5,069,070 |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $10,720,160 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
42
Statement of changes in net assets
| | |
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS | | |
|
| Six months ended | Year ended |
| 1/31/08* | 7/31/07 |
|
Operations: | | |
Net investment income | $ 5,651,090 | $ 11,899,576 |
|
Net realized gain on investments | 126,589 | 852,287 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 4,942,481 | (1,880,040) |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 10,720,160 | 10,871,823 |
From ordinary income | | |
|
From tax-exempt net investment income | | |
|
Class A | (5,039,705) | (10,294,793) |
|
Class B | (497,180) | (1,474,638) |
|
Class C | (126,688) | (261,040) |
|
Class M | (19,722) | (38,564) |
|
Class Y | (34) | — |
|
From net realized long-term gain on investments | | |
|
Class A | (355,061) | (766,496) |
|
Class B | (38,571) | (140,345) |
|
Class C | (11,324) | (23,944) |
|
Class M | (1,585) | (3,188) |
|
Decrease from capital share transactions (Note 4) | (108,659) | (36,929,988) |
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets | 4,521,631 | (39,061,173) |
|
|
NET ASSETS | | |
|
Beginning of period | 300,643,736 | 339,704,909 |
|
End of period (including undistributed net investment income | | |
of $236,731 and $268,970, respectively) | $305,165,367 | $300,643,736 |
* Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
43
Financial highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | LESS DISTRIBUTIONS: | | | | | RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |
| | | Net | | | | | | | Total | | | Ratio of net | |
| Net asset | | realized and | Total | From | From | | | Net asset | return | Net | Ratio of | investment | |
| value, | Net | unrealized | from | net | net realized | | | value, | at net | assets, | expenses to | income (loss) | Portfolio |
| beginning | investment | gain (loss) on | investment | investment | gain on | Total | Redemption | end | asset | end of period | average net | to average | turnover |
Period ended | of period | income (loss) | investments | operations | income | investments | distributions | fees | of period | value (%)(a) | (in thousands) | assets (%)(b) | net assets (%) | (%) |
|
CLASS A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008** | $14.59 | .28 | .25 | .53 | (.29) | (.02) | (.31) | — | $14.81 | 3.60* | $266,827 | .42* | 1.93* | 9.75* |
July 31, 2007 | 14.70 | .56(c) | (.06) | .50 | (.57) | (.04) | (.61) | — | 14.59 | 3.41 | 257,709 | .85(c) | 3.78(c) | 18.88 |
July 31, 2006 | 15.07 | .57(c) | (.30) | .27 | (.56) | (.08) | (.64) | —(d) | 14.70 | 1.85 | 270,331 | .85(c) | 3.81(c) | 6.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 14.92 | .54(c) | .26 | .80 | (.54) | (.11) | (.65) | —(d) | 15.07 | 5.39 | 277,931 | .84(c) | 3.57(c) | 12.61 |
July 31, 2004 | 14.93 | .53 | .25 | .78 | (.53) | (.26) | (.79) | — | 14.92 | 5.20 | 287,528 | .85 | 3.49 | 26.81 |
July 31, 2003 | 15.46 | .58 | (.16) | .42 | (.59) | (.36) | (.95) | — | 14.93 | 2.71 | 368,419 | .84 | 3.76 | 42.88 |
|
|
CLASS B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008** | $14.61 | .24 | .25 | .49 | (.24) | (.02) | (.26) | — | $14.84 | 3.36* | $28,514 | .74* | 1.61* | 9.75* |
July 31, 2007 | 14.72 | .47(c) | (.07) | .40 | (.47) | (.04) | (.51) | — | 14.61 | 2.73 | 33,472 | 1.49(c) | 3.13(c) | 18.88 |
July 31, 2006 | 15.09 | .47(c) | (.29) | .18 | (.47) | (.08) | (.55) | —(d) | 14.72 | 1.26 | 59,527 | 1.50(c) | 3.15(c) | 6.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 14.94 | .44(c) | .26 | .70 | (.44) | (.11) | (.55) | —(d) | 15.09 | 4.71 | 88,337 | 1.49(c) | 2.92(c) | 12.61 |
July 31, 2004 | 14.95 | .44 | .24 | .68 | (.43) | (.26) | (.69) | — | 14.94 | 4.52 | 110,498 | 1.50 | 2.83 | 26.81 |
July 31, 2003 | 15.48 | .48 | (.16) | .32 | (.49) | (.36) | (.85) | — | 14.95 | 2.04 | 150,266 | 1.49 | 3.10 | 42.88 |
|
|
CLASS C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008** | $14.61 | .23 | .25 | .48 | (.23) | (.02) | (.25) | — | $14.84 | 3.32* | $8,580 | .82* | 1.54* | 9.75* |
July 31, 2007 | 14.73 | .44(c) | (.07) | .37 | (.45) | (.04) | (.49) | — | 14.61 | 2.60 | 8,405 | 1.64(c) | 2.99(c) | 18.88 |
July 31, 2006 | 15.09 | .45(c) | (.29) | .16 | (.44) | (.08) | (.52) | —(d) | 14.73 | 1.12 | 8,723 | 1.65(c) | 3.01(c) | 6.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 14.94 | .42(c) | .26 | .68 | (.42) | (.11) | (.53) | —(d) | 15.09 | 4.54 | 8,835 | 1.64(c) | 2.77(c) | 12.61 |
July 31, 2004 | 14.95 | .41 | .25 | .66 | (.41) | (.26) | (.67) | — | 14.94 | 4.40 | 10,097 | 1.65 | 2.69 | 26.81 |
July 31, 2003 | 15.49 | .46 | (.17) | .29 | (.47) | (.36) | (.83) | — | 14.95 | 1.82 | 13,793 | 1.64 | 2.95 | 42.88 |
|
|
CLASS M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008** | $14.63 | .26 | .26 | .52 | (.27) | (.02) | (.29) | — | $14.86 | 3.59* | $1,234 | .57* | 1.79* | 9.75* |
July 31, 2007 | 14.74 | .52(c) | (.06) | .46 | (.53) | (.04) | (.57) | — | 14.63 | 3.19 | 1,059 | 1.14(c) | 3.49(c) | 18.88 |
July 31, 2006 | 15.11 | .53(c) | (.30) | .23 | (.52) | (.08) | (.60) | —(d) | 14.74 | 1.55 | 1,124 | 1.15(c) | 3.51(c) | 6.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 14.96 | .50(c) | .25 | .75 | (.49) | (.11) | (.60) | —(d) | 15.11 | 5.05 | 1,135 | 1.14(c) | 3.27(c) | 12.61 |
July 31, 2004 | 14.97 | .49 | .24 | .73 | (.48) | (.26) | (.74) | — | 14.96 | 4.93 | 1,188 | 1.15 | 3.19 | 26.81 |
July 31, 2003 | 15.50 | .54 | (.16) | .38 | (.55) | (.36) | (.91) | — | 14.97 | 2.40 | 2,148 | 1.14 | 3.45 | 42.88 |
|
|
CLASS Y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008 †** | $14.71 | .05 | .11 | .16 | (.05) | — | (.05) | —(d) | 14.82 | 1.10* | $10 | .05* | .39* | 9.75* |
|
See notes to financial highlights at the end of this section.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Financial highlights (Continued)
* Not annualized.
** Unaudited.
† For the period January 2, 2008 (commencement of operations) to January 31, 2008.
(a) Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.
(b) Includes amounts paid through expense offset arrangements (Note 2).
(c) Reflects an involuntary contractual expense limitation in effect during the period. As a result of such limitation, the expenses of each class reflect a reduction of the following amounts (Note 2):
| | |
| Percentage | |
| of average | |
| net assets | |
| |
July 31, 2007 | <0.01% | |
| |
July 31, 2006 | <0.01 | |
| |
July 31, 2005 | <0.01 | |
| |
(d) Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
46
Notes to financial statements 1/31/08 (Unaudited)
Note 1: Significant accounting policies
Putnam AMT-Free Municipal Fund (the “fund”) formerly Putnam Tax-Free Insured Fund, is a series of Putnam Tax Free Income Trust (the “trust”), a Massachusetts business trust, which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open end management investment company. The fund pursues its objective of seeking high current income exempt from federal income tax by investing in tax exempt securities that are covered by insurance guaranteeing the timely payment of principal and interest, are rated AAA or Aaa, or are backed by the U.S. government. The fund may invest in higher yielding, lower rated bonds that may have a higher rate of default.
The fund offers class A, class B, class C, class M and class Y shares. Class A and class M shares are sold with a maximum front-end sales charge of 4.00% and 3.25%, respectively, and generally do not pay a contingent deferred sales charge. Effective January 2, 2008, the fund issued class Y shares. Class B shares, which convert to class A shares after approximately 8 years, do not pay a front-end sales charge and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge, if those shares are redeemed within 6 years of purchase. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge and do not convert to class A shares. The expenses for class A, class B, class C, and class M shares may differ based on the distribution fee of each class, which is identified in Note 2. Class Y shares, which are sold at net asset value, are generally subject to the same expenses as class A, class B, class C, and class M shares, but do not bear a distribution fee. Class Y shares are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.
A 1.00% redemption fee may apply on any shares that are redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 7 days of purchase. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in-capital. Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the fund are borne pro-rata based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund, except that each class bears expenses unique to that class (including the distribution fees applicable to such classes). Each class votes as a class only with respect to its own distribution plan or other matters on which a class vote is required by law or determined by the Trustees. If the fund were liquidated, shares of each class would receive their pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund. In addition, the Trustees declare separate dividends on each class of shares.
In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund expects the risk of material loss to be remote.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A) Security valuation Tax-exempt bonds and notes are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by an independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. Such services use information with respect to transactions in bonds, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various relationships between securities in determining value. Certain investments and derivatives are also valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and procedures
47
are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably expect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security at a given point in time and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.
B) Security transactions and related investment income Security transactions are recorded on the trade date (the date the order to buy or sell is executed). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a forward commitment or delayed delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date; interest income is accrued based on the terms of the securities. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract. All premiums/discounts are amortized/accreted on a yield-to-maturity basis. The premium in excess of the call price, if any, is amortized to the call date; thereafter, any remaining premium is amortized to maturity.
C) Futures and options contracts The fund may use futures and options contracts to hedge against changes in the values of securities the fund owns, owned or expects to purchase, or for other investment purposes. The fund may also write options on swaps or securities it owns or in which it may invest to increase its current returns.
The potential risk to the fund is that the change in value of futures and options contracts may not correspond to the change in value of the hedged instruments. In addition, losses may arise from changes in the value of the underlying instruments, if there is an illiquid secondary market for the contracts, or if the counterparty to the contract is unable to perform. Risks may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. When the contract is closed, the fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Realized gains and losses on purchased options are included in realized gains and losses on investment securities. If a written call option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as an addition to sales proceeds. If a written put option is exercised, the premium originally receive d is recorded as a reduction to the cost of investments.
Futures contracts are valued at the quoted daily settlement prices established by the exchange on which they trade. The fund and the broker agree to exchange an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the futures contract. Such receipts or payments are known as “variation margin.” Exchange traded options are valued at the last sale price or, if no sales are reported, the last bid price for purchased options and the last ask price for written options. Options traded over-the-counter are valued using prices supplied by dealers. Futures and written option contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
D) Total return swap contracts The fund may enter into total return swap contracts, which are arrangements to exchange a market linked return for a periodic payment, both based on a notional principal amount. To the extent that the total return of the security, index or other financial measure underlying the transaction exceeds or falls short of the offsetting interest rate obligation, the fund will receive a payment from or make a payment to the counterparty. Total return swap contracts are marked to market daily based upon quotations from market makers and the change, if any, is recorded as an unrealized gain or loss. Payments received or made are recorded as a realized gains or loss. Certain total return swap contracts may include extended effective dates. Income related to these swap contracts is accrued based on the terms of the contract. The fund could be exposed to credit or market risk due to unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or in the price of the underlying security or
48
index, the possibility that there is no liquid market for these agreements or that the counterparty may default on its obligation to perform. Risk of loss may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. Total return swap contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
E) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code, as amended. Therefore, no provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains.
The aggregate identified cost on a tax basis is $293,483,522, resulting in gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of $17,691,248 and $1,358,784, respectively, or net unrealized appreciation of $16,332,464.
F) Distributions to shareholders Income dividends are recorded daily by the fund and are paid monthly. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. Actual results may vary. Any non-taxable return of capital cannot be determined until final tax calculations are completed after the end of the fund’s fiscal year. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations.
G) Expenses of the trust Expenses directly charged or attributable to any fund will be paid from the assets of that fund. Generally, expenses of the trust will be allocated among and charged to the assets of each fund on a basis that the Trustees deem fair and equitable, which may be based on the relative assets of each fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each fund.
Note 2: Management fee, administrative services and other transactions
Putnam Management is paid for management and investment advisory services monthly based on the average net assets of the fund. Such fee is based on the lesser of (i) and annual rate of 0.50% of the average net asset value of the fund or (ii) the following annual rates: 0.60% of the first $500 million of average net assets, 0.50% of the next $500 million, 0.45% of the next $500 million, 0.40% of the next $5 billion, 0.375% of the next $5 billion, 0.355% of the next $5 billion, and 0.34% of the next $5 billion and 0.33% thereafter.
Putnam Management has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund through June 30, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds viewed by Lipper Inc. as having the same investment classification or objective as the fund. The expense reimbursement is based on a comparison of the fund’s expenses with the average annualized operating expenses of the funds in its Lipper peer group for each calendar quarter during the fund’s last fiscal year, excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. For the six months ended January 31, 2008, Putnam Management did not waive any of its management fee from the fund.
For the period ended January 31, 2008, Putnam Management has assumed $505 of legal, shareholder servicing and communication, audit and Trustee fees incurred by the fund in connection with certain legal and regulatory matters (including those described in Note 5).
49
The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.
Custodial services for the fund’s assets were provided by Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), an affiliate of Putnam Management, and by State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”). Custody fees are based on the fund’s asset level, the number of its security holdings, transaction volumes and with respect to PFTC, certain fees related to the transition of assets to State Street. Putnam Investor Services, a division of PFTC, provided investor servicing agent functions to the fund. Putnam Investor Services received fees for investor servicing, subject to certain limitations, based on the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in the fund. During the period ended January 31, 2008, the fund incurred $92,367 for custody and investor servicing agent functions provided by PFTC.
Under the custodian contract between the fund and State Street, the custodian bank has a lien on the securities of the fund to the extent permitted by the fund’s investment restrictions to cover any advances made by the custodian bank for the settlement of securities purchased by the fund. At January 31, 2008, the payable to the custodian bank represents the amount due for cash advanced for the settlement of securities purchased.
The fund has entered into arrangements with PFTC and State Street whereby PFTC’s and State Street’s fees are reduced by credits allowed on cash balances. For the six months ended January 31, 2008, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $53,936 under these arrangements.
Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $321, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings and industry seminars and for certain compliance-related matters. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees.
The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”) which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the Deferral Plan.
The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) covering all Trustees of the fund who have served as a Trustee for at least five years and were first elected prior to 2004. Benefits under the Pension Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee’s average annual attendance and retainer fees for the three years ended December 31, 2005. The retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. Pension expense for the fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of assets and liabilities. The Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected after 2003.
The fund has adopted distribution plans (the “Plans”) with respect to its class A, class B, class C and class M shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management at an annual rate of up to 0.35%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 1.00% of the average net assets
50
attributable to class A, class B, class C and class M shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at the annual rate of 0.85%, 1.00% and 0.50% of the average net assets for class B, class C and class M shares, respectively. For class A shares, the annual payment rate will equal the weighted average of (i) 0.20% on the net assets of the fund attributable to class A shares purchased and paid for prior to March 21, 2005 and (ii) 0.25% on all other net assets of the fund attributable to class A shares.
For the six months ended January 31, 2008, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $11,426 and $144 from the sale of class A and class M shares, respectively, and received $15,409 and $262 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares, respectively.
A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% is assessed on certain redemptions of class A shares that were purchased without an initial sales charge as part of an investment of $1 million or more. For the six months ended January 31, 2008, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received $51 on class A redemptions.
Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities
During the six months ended January 31, 2008, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments aggregated $28,441,882 and $33,463,126, respectively. There were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
Note 4: Capital shares
At January 31, 2008, there was an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
| | |
CLASS A | Shares | Amount |
|
Six months ended 1/31/08: | |
Shares sold | 1,334,906 | $ 19,382,135 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 253,454 | 3,720,565 |
|
| 1,588,360 | 23,102,700 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (1,243,147) | (18,008,570) |
|
Net increase | 345,213 | $ 5,094,130 |
|
Year ended 7/31/07: | | |
Shares sold | 2,122,193 | $ 31,408,659 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 484,672 | 7,163,157 |
|
| 2,606,865 | 38,571,816 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (3,329,890) | (49,225,238) |
|
Net decrease | (723,025) | $(10,653,422) |
|
|
CLASS B | Shares | Amount |
|
Six months ended 1/31/08: | |
Shares sold | 52,636 | $ 773,075 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 22,329 | 328,108 |
|
| 74,965 | 1,101,183 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (444,178) | (6,521,725) |
|
Net decrease | (369,213) | $ (5,420,542) |
|
Year ended 7/31/07: | | |
Shares sold | 63,966 | $ 943,801 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 62,629 | 933,071 |
|
| 126,595 | 1,876,872 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (1,879,027) | (27,837,922) |
|
Net decrease | (1,752,432) | $(25,961,050) |
51
| | |
CLASS C | Shares | Amount |
|
Six months ended 1/31/08: | |
Shares sold | 58,651 | $869,659 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 5,836 | 80,383 |
|
| 64,487 | 950,042 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (61,485) | (900,208) |
|
Net increase | 3,002 | 49,834 |
|
Year ended 7/31/07: | | |
Shares sold | 90,701 | $ 1,340,666 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 10,421 | 154,330 |
|
| 101,122 | 1,494,996 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (118,389) | (1,753,391) |
|
Net decrease | (17,267) | $(258,395) |
|
|
CLASS M | Shares | Amount |
|
Six months ended 1/31/08: | |
Shares sold | 15,128 | $ 225,066 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 1,051 | 14,316 |
|
| 16,179 | 239,382 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (5,542) | (81,496) |
|
Net increase | 10,637 | $ 157,886 |
|
Year ended 7/31/07: | | |
Shares sold | 4,385 | $ 65,606 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 2,106 | 31,219 |
|
| 6,491 | 96,825 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | (10,358) | (153,946) |
|
Net decrease | (3,867) | $ (57,121) |
| | |
CLASS Y | Shares | Amount |
|
For the period 1/02/08 (commencement of operations) |
to 1/31/08: | | |
Shares sold | 680 | $ 9,999 |
|
Shares issued | | |
in connection | | |
with reinvestment | | |
of distributions | 2 | 34 |
|
| 682 | 10,033 |
|
Shares | | |
repurchased | — | — |
|
Net increase | 682 | $10,033 |
At January 31, 2008, Putnam, LLC owned 682 class Y shares of the fund (100% of class Y shares outstanding), valued at $10,107.
Note 5: Regulatory matters and litigation
In late 2003 and 2004, Putnam Management settled charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division in connection with excessive short-term trading in Putnam funds. Payments from Putnam Management will be distributed to certain open-end Putnam funds and their shareholders. These allegations and related matters have served as the general basis for certain lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits against Putnam Management and, in a limited number of cases, some Putnam funds. Putnam Management believes that these lawsuits will have no material adverse effect on the funds or on Putnam Management’s ability to provide investment management services. In addition, Putnam Management has agreed to bear any costs incurred by the Putnam funds as a result of these matters.
Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management are named as defendants in a civil suit in which the plaintiffs allege that the management and distribution fees paid by certain Putnam funds were excessive and seek recovery under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management
52
have contested the plaintiffs’ claims and the matter is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Based on currently available information, Putnam Management believes that this action is without merit and that it is unlikely to have a material effect on Putnam Management’s and Putnam Retail Management’s ability to provide services to their clients, including the fund.
Note 6: New accounting pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (the “Interpretation”). The Interpretation prescribes a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken by a filer in the filer’s tax return. Upon adoption, the Interpretation did not have a material effect on the fund’s financial statements. However, the conclusions regarding the Interpretation may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, further implementation guidance expected from the FASB, and on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (the “Standard”). The Standard defines fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The Standard applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards. The Standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Putnam Management is currently evaluating what impact the adoption of the Standard will have on the fund’s financial statements.
53
The Putnam family of funds
The following is a list of Putnam’s open-end mutual funds offered to the public. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund before investing. For a prospectus containing this and other information for any Putnam fund or product, call your financial advisor at 1-800-225-1581 and ask for a prospectus. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.
Growth funds
Discovery Growth Fund
Growth Opportunities Fund
Health Sciences Trust
International New Opportunities Fund*
New Opportunities Fund
OTC & Emerging Growth Fund
Small Cap Growth Fund*
Vista Fund
Voyager Fund
Blend funds
Capital Appreciation Fund
Capital Opportunities Fund*
Europe Equity Fund*
Global Equity Fund*
Global Natural Resources Fund*
International Capital
Opportunities Fund*
International Equity Fund*
Investors Fund
Research Fund
Tax Smart Equity Fund®
Utilities Growth and Income Fund
Value funds
Classic Equity Fund
Convertible Income-Growth Trust
Equity Income Fund
The George Putnam Fund of Boston
The Putnam Fund for Growth
and Income
International Growth and Income Fund*
Mid Cap Value Fund
New Value Fund
Small Cap Value Fund*
Income funds
American Government Income Fund
Diversified Income Trust
Floating Rate Income Fund
Global Income Trust*
High Yield Advantage Fund*
High Yield Trust*
Income Fund
Money Market Fund†
U.S. Government Income Trust
* A 1% redemption fee on total assets redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of purchase may be imposed for all share classes of these funds.
†An investment in a money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency. Although the fund seeks to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund.
54
Tax-free income funds
AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund
Tax Exempt Income Fund
Tax Exempt Money Market Fund†
Tax-Free High Yield Fund
State tax-free income funds:
Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Michigan,
Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio,
and Pennsylvania
Asset allocation funds
Income Strategies Fund
Putnam Asset Allocation Funds — three investment portfolios that spread your money across a variety of stocks, bonds, and money market investments.
The three portfolios:
Asset Allocation: Balanced Portfolio
Asset Allocation: Conservative Portfolio
Asset Allocation: Growth Portfolio
Putnam RetirementReady® Funds
Putnam RetirementReady Funds — ten investment portfolios that offer diversifica-tion among stocks, bonds, and money market instruments and adjust to become more conservative over time based on a target date for withdrawing assets.
The ten funds:
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2045 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2035 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2025 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2020 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2015 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady 2010 Fund
Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Fund
With the exception of money market funds, a 1% redemption fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase (90 days, for certain funds).
Check your account balances and the most recent month-end performance at www.putnam.com.
55
Putnam puts your interests first
In January 2004, Putnam began introducing a number of voluntary initiatives designed to reduce fund expenses, provide investors with more useful information, and help safeguard the interests of all Putnam investors. Visit www.putnam.com for details.
Cost-cutting initiatives
Ongoing expenses will be limited Through calendar 2008, total ongoing expenses, including management fees for all funds, will be maintained at or below the average of each fund’s industry peers in its Lipper load-fund universe. For more information, please see the Statement of Additional information.
Lower class B purchase limit To help ensure that investors are in the most cost-effective share class, the maximum amount that can be invested in class B shares has been reduced to $100,000. (Larger trades or accumulated amounts will be refused.)
Improved disclosure
Putnam fund prospectuses and shareholder reports have been revised to disclose additional information that will help shareholders compare funds and weigh their costs and risks along with their potential benefits. Shareholders will find easy-to-understand information about fund expense ratios, portfolio manager compensation, risk comparisons, turnover comparisons, brokerage commissions, and employee and trustee ownership of Putnam funds. Disclosure of breakpoint discounts has also been enhanced to alert investors to potential cost savings.
Protecting investors’ interests
Short-term trading fee introduced To discourage short-term trading, which can interfere with a fund’s long-term strategy, a 1% short-term trading fee may be imposed on any Putnam fund shares (other than money market funds) redeemed or exchanged within seven calendar days of purchase (for certain funds, this fee applies for 90 days).
56
Fund information
Founded over 70 years ago, Putnam Investments was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We manage over 100 mutual funds in growth, value, blend, fixed income, and international.
| | |
Investment Manager | W. Thomas Stephens | James P. Pappas |
Putnam Investment | Richard B. Worley | Vice President |
Management, LLC | | |
One Post Office Square | Officers | Francis J. McNamara, III |
Boston, MA 02109 | Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. | Vice President and |
| President | Chief Legal Officer |
Marketing Services | | |
Putnam Retail Management | Charles E. Porter | Robert R. Leveille |
One Post Office Square | Executive Vice President, | Vice President and |
Boston, MA 02109 | Principal Executive Officer, | Chief Compliance Officer |
| Associate Treasurer and | |
Custodian | Compliance Liaison | Mark C. Trenchard |
State Street Bank and | | Vice President and |
Trust Company | Jonathan S. Horwitz | BSA Compliance Officer |
| Senior Vice President | |
Legal Counsel | and Treasurer | Judith Cohen |
Ropes & Gray LLP | | Vice President, Clerk and |
| Steven D. Krichmar | Assistant Treasurer |
Trustees | Vice President and | |
John A. Hill, Chairman | Principal Financial Officer | Wanda M. McManus |
Jameson Adkins Baxter, | | Vice President, Senior Associate |
Vice Chairman | Janet C. Smith | Treasurer and Assistant Clerk |
Charles B. Curtis | Vice President, Principal | |
Robert J. Darretta | Accounting Officer and | Nancy E. Florek |
Myra R. Drucker | Assistant Treasurer | Vice President, Assistant Clerk, |
Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. | | Assistant Treasurer and |
Paul L. Joskow | Susan G. Malloy | Proxy Manager |
Elizabeth T. Kennan | Vice President and | |
Kenneth R. Leibler | Assistant Treasurer | |
Robert E. Patterson | | |
George Putnam, III | Beth S. Mazor | |
| Vice President | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit www.putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.
Item 2. Code of Ethics:
Not applicable
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:
Not applicable
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:
Not applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments:
The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to shareholders in Item 1 above.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management Investment Companies:
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies
Not Applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers:
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
Not applicable
Item 11. Controls and Procedures:
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: Not applicable
Item 12. Exhibits:
(a)(1) Not applicable
(a)(2) Separate certifications for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Putnam Tax Free Income Trust
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 31, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Charles E. Porter
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer
Date: March 31, 2008
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer
Date: March 31, 2008
| | |
UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|
FORM N-CSR |
|
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED |
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
| |
Investment Company Act file number: (811- 04345) | |
| |
Exact name of registrant as specified in charter: | Putnam Tax Free Income Trust |
|
Address of principal executive offices: One Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
| |
Name and address of agent for service: | Beth S. Mazor, Vice President |
| One Post Office Square |
| Boston, Massachusetts 02109 |
| |
Copy to: | John W. Gerstmayr, Esq. |
| Ropes & Gray LLP |
| One International Place |
| Boston, Massachusetts 02110 |
| |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: | (617) 292-1000 |
| | |
Date of fiscal year end: July 31, 2008 | | |
|
Date of reporting period: August 1, 2007 — January 31, 2008 |
Item 1. Report to Stockholders:
The following is a copy of the report transmitted to stockholders pursuant to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940:
What makes Putnam different?
In 1830, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Samuel Putnam established The Prudent Man Rule, a legal foundation for responsible money management.
THE PRUDENT MAN RULE
All that can be required of a trustee to invest is that he shall conduct himself faithfully and exercise a sound discretion. He is to observe how men of prudence, discretion, and intelligence manage their own affairs, not in regard to speculation, but in regard to the permanent disposition of their funds, considering the probable income, as well as the probable safety of the capital to be invested.
A time-honored tradition in money management
Since 1937, our values have been rooted in a profound sense of responsibility for the money entrusted to us.
A prudent approach to investing
We use a research-driven team approach to seek consistent, dependable, superior investment results over time, although there is no guarantee a fund will meet its objectives.
Funds for every investment goal
We offer a broad range of mutual funds and other financial products so investors and their financial representatives can build diversified portfolios.
A commitment to doing what’s right for investors
With a focus on investment performance, below-average expenses, and in-depth information about our funds, we put the interests of investors first and seek to set the standard for integrity and service.
Industry-leading service
We help investors, along with their financial representatives, make informed investment decisions with confidence.
Putnam
Tax-Free
HighYield Fund
1| 31| 08
Semiannual Report
| |
Message from the Trustees | 2 |
About the fund | 4 |
Performance snapshot | 6 |
Interview with your fund’s Portfolio Leader | 7 |
Performance in depth | 12 |
Expenses | 15 |
Portfolio turnover | 17 |
Risk | 18 |
Your fund’s management | 19 |
Terms and definitions | 20 |
Trustee approval of management contract | 22 |
Other information for shareholders | 27 |
Financial statements | 28 |
Cover photograph: © Richard H. Johnson
Message from the Trustees
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
In early 2008, financial markets face clear challenges. What began as a rise in defaults for a limited segment of the U.S. mortgage market has spread across the global financial sector and produced a significant tightening of credit conditions. Forecasts for global growth have been reduced as a result, and markets have reacted by sending stock prices lower. In the United States, the economy weakened sharply in late 2007, raising the chance of a recession this year. Fortunately, policymakers have taken action to stimulate growth: The Federal Reserve Board cut interest rates, and federal lawmakers, working with the president, approved a $168 billion fiscal stimulus plan.
As investors, it is natural to feel discouraged by disappointing short-term results. During these challenging times, it is important to remember the value of a long-term perspective and the counsel of your financial representative. The normal condition of the economy and corporate earnings is one of growth, albeit with occasional interruptions. As in the past, after a period of weakness the economy is likely to regain its momentum and produce the growth and corporate earnings that investors expect.
Starting this month, we have changed the portfolio manager’s commentary in this report to a question-and-answer format. We feel that this makes the information more readable and accessible, and we hope you think so as well.
2
Lastly, we note that Putnam Investments celebrated its 70th anniversary in November. From modest beginnings in Boston, Massachusetts, the company has grown into a global asset manager that serves millions of investors worldwide. Although the mutual fund industry has undergone many changes since George Putnam introduced his innovative balanced fund in 1937, Putnam’s guiding principles have not. As we celebrate this 70-year milestone, we look forward to Putnam continuing its long tradition of prudent money management. Thank you for your support of the Putnam funds.
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund: Potential for high
current income exempt from federal income tax
Two of the most significant challenges of fixed-income investing are low interest rates and taxes on income. Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund can help investors reduce the impact of both by investing in higher-yielding municipal bonds, which offer the potential for a greater stream of income along with tax advantages. While the stated yields on municipal bonds are lower than those of taxable bonds, the income most of these bonds pay is exempt from federal income tax.
Municipal bonds are typically issued by states and local municipalities to raise funds for building and maintaining public facilities. The income from a municipal bond is generally exempt from federal income tax, and from state taxes for residents of the state in which the bond is issued. Municipal bonds are backed by either the issuing city or town or by revenues collected from usage fees, and as a result have varying degrees of credit risk (the risk that the issuer won’t be able to repay the bond).
Many high-yield municipal bonds are not rated by independent rating agencies such as Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. This is mainly because many issuers decide not to pursue a rating that might be below investment grade. As a result, investment managers must do additional research to determine whether these bonds are prudent investments.
Evaluating a bond’s credit risk is one area in which Putnam has particular expertise. Putnam’s municipal bond research team analyzes each issue in depth and assigns unrated bonds an agency-equivalent Putnam rating — instead of rating bonds on a pass/fail basis, which is a common practice in the industry. Although unrated bonds typically represent only a small portion of the fund’s holdings, this analysis helps the management team in its efforts to identify bonds with attractive risk/return profiles from among this group.
Once the fund has invested in a bond, the fund’s management team continues to monitor developments that affect the bond market, the specific sector (for example, hospitals or utilities), and the issuer of the bond. Typically, higher-risk, lower-rated bonds are reviewed more frequently because of their greater potential risk.
The goal of the fund’s approach to research and active management is to stay a step ahead of the industry and pinpoint opportunities to adjust the fund’s holdings for the benefit of the fund and its shareholders.
Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes. Tax-free funds may not be suitable for IRAs and other non-taxable accounts. Please consult with your tax advisor for more information. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses.
Understanding tax-equivalent yield
To understand the value of tax-free income, it is helpful to compare a municipal bond’s yield with the “tax-equivalent yield” — the before-tax yield that must be offered by a taxable bond in order to equal the municipal bond’s yield after taxes.
How to calculate tax-equivalent yield:
The tax-equivalent yield equals the municipal bond’s yield divided by “one minus the tax rate.” For example, if a municipal bond’s yield is 5%, then its tax-equivalent yield is 7.7%, assuming the maximum 35% federal tax rate for 2007.
Results for investors subject to lower tax rates would not be as advantageous.
Municipal bonds may finance a range of projects in your
community and thus play a key role in its development.
Performance snapshot
Putnam Tax-Free
HighYield Fund
Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. Share price, principal value, and return will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. Performance of class A shares assumes reinvestment of distributions and does not account for taxes. Fund returns in the bar chart do not reflect a sales charge of 4.00%; had they, returns would have been lower. See pages 12–14 for additional performance information. For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower. A 1% short-term trading fee may apply. To obtain the most recent month-end performance, visit www.putnam.com.
* Derived from the historical performance of B shares (inception 9/9/85), adjusted for the applicable sales charge and lower operating expenses.
† Returns for the six-month period are not annualized, but cumulative.
6
The period in review
Paul, thanks for taking some time with us today to talk about how Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund has fared during the past six months. How did it perform?
The fund essentially treaded water, returning 0.32% for the first half of its 2008 fiscal year. In posting that result, the fund trailed its benchmark but strongly outperformed its Lipper peer group average. During the period, investors became extremely risk-averse in response to the meltdown in the subprime mortgage market and favored bonds with investment-grade ratings over alternatives in the lower-rated, high-yield municipal bond market. The benchmark includes a significant stake in investment-grade municipal bonds, which is why it performed better than the fund. We focus mainly on the high-yield muni bond market.
At the same time, the fund performed much better than most of the other high-yield municipal bond
Broad market index and fund performance
This comparison shows your fund’s performance in the context of broad market indexes for the six months ended 1/31/08. See page 6 and pages 12–14 for additional fund performance information. Index descriptions can be found on page 21.
7
funds in its Lipper peer group. What helped you do better than the peer group average?
Overall, we positioned the fund more conservatively than our competitors, using two approaches to insulate the fund from the difficulties encountered by the markets during the period. The first action was related to what we call the fund’s term structure, meaning how we targeted maturities along the municipal bond market yield curve. During the period, we kept the fund’s duration —a measure of its sensitivity to changes in interest rates — in line with the benchmark. At the same time, though, we favored the front, or shorter, end of the yield curve because we felt we weren’t being compensated for the added risk inherent in longer-term securities. This approach helped performance, as shorter-term yields fell as the Federal Reserve Bank cut interest rates, while longer-term yields remained generally stable because of, among other factors, lingering concerns that inflation could still be a problem going forward.
What was the second move that bolstered performance?
We maintained a conservative credit profile, putting most of the fund in bonds rated BBB or BB, the higher-quality tiers of the municipal bond market. Conversely, we underweighted non-rated bonds and those with a B rating. This move proved fruitful as investors pulled assets out of riskier investments in reaction to the problems in the subprime mortgage market.
Credit quality overview
Credit qualities shown as a percentage of portfolio value as of 1/31/08. A bond rated Baa or higher (MIG3/VMIG3 or higher, for short-term debt) is considered investment grade. The chart reflects Moody’s ratings; percentages may include bonds not rated by Moody’s but considered by Putnam Management to be of comparable quality. Ratings will vary over time.
8
Let’s take a look at how some of your sector-positioning moves influenced performance.
One of the main areas that provided a positive impact on our performance was the land sector, where municipal entities issue bonds to help support the build-out of infrastructure for real estate developments, particularly in California, Florida, Illinois, and Nevada. In the land sector, we made a well-timed move from a neutral positioning to significant underweighting in advance of the subprime-influenced sell-off that hit that sector. The investments we maintained in this area were developments that we felt were well positioned because they were projects that already had recorded sales, or were placed in plots of land surrounded by dwellings or buildings on all four sides — not on the outskirts of a city or town — where it was more likely the developments would be completed.
Any other sector success stories of note for the period?
Overweighting single-family housing planned amortization class (PAC) bonds also helped. PAC bonds are issued by states’ housing finance authorities to help provide below-market-rate loans to low-income borrowers. These investments performed well because they offered reduced risk — an attractive attribute in a struggling market — in the form of short maturities and positive structural characteristics that protected bondholders. They also were immune
Comparison of the fund’s maturity and duration
This chart compares changes in the fund’s average effective maturity (a weighted average of the holdings’ maturities) and its average effective duration (a measure of its sensitivity to interest-rate changes).
Average effective duration and average effective maturity take into account put and call features, where applicable, and reflect prepayments for mortgage-backed securities. Duration is usually shorter than maturity because it reflects interest payments on a bond prior to its maturity.
9
to the subprime downdraft because homeowners can qualify for these loans only after meeting relatively stringent borrowing requirements, including providing down payments. In this area, North Dakota State Housing Finance Agency proved to be a top performer for the fund. These bonds offered a short average maturity along with an attractive coupon rate, a good combination during the period when short-term interest rates fell. Another top performer in a different sector was Hunterdon Medical Center, a nonprofit health-care system in New Jersey. The bonds performed well due to the organization’s dominant market position and the possibility of a credit-rating upgrade, and were sold for a profit during the period.
Which investment decisions detracted from performance?
Our decision to maintain an overweighting in tobacco settlement bonds, one of the more volatile sectors of the municipal bond market, hurt the fund’s relative return. We were attracted to the yields offered by these investments, whose payments are secured by income that municipalities earn from tobacco companies as a settlement for previous lawsuits. Unfortunately, this sector was held back by an increase in the supply of new issuance of tobacco bonds at the same time that demand shrunk as investors pulled back from risk. The Tobacco Settlement Revenue Management Authority of South Carolina was among the fund’s tobacco investments that got caught in the downdraft.
I N T H E N E W S
The subprime mortgage financial crisis started in the United States during the fall of 2006, and became a global financial crisis by July 2007. Lax mortgage lending practices in 2005 and 2006 resulted in rising debt loads for borrowers with weak credit histories. This situation was sustainable when mortgage rates were extremely low and home prices were rising, but as interest rates rose in early 2007, delinquencies and foreclosures began to spike. Many homeowners were unable or unwilling to meet financial commitments, and many lenders were left without a means to recoup their losses. As this report was being prepared, the problem continued to take its toll on markets around the world. In past economic cycles, defaults would have been limited, but the repackaging, securitization, and wide-scale distribution of subprime mortgage debt by U.S. investment banks enabled the mortgage crisis to take on global proportions.
10
Paul, what’s the team’s outlook as we move forward into 2008?
Many economists believe we are headed for a recession — if we aren’t in one already. The current thinking, though, is that the recession likely will be relatively shallow, in part because the Fed has been so aggressive in cutting short-term rates to stave off a deeper trough. In any event, we anticipate the U.S. economy will remain relatively weak for the next six to nine months, with hopes that we’ll then see some sort of a rebound.
How do you anticipate positioning the fund to respond?
We expect to continue to invest in shorter-term maturities, for example, in the 10- to 20-year range rather than among bonds with maturities of 20 to 30 years. That’s because we are concerned that rates may rise among longer-maturity bonds due to reduced demand for them and because of the potential for higher inflation. We also intend to increase our exposure to bonds rated BBB and below, particularly in the BBB area, as we feel yields offered by these securities have begun to fairly compensate investors for the risks they are assuming.
The views expressed in this report are exclusively those of Putnam Management. They are not meant as investment advice.
Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes. For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Income from federally exempt funds may be subject to state and local taxes. Mutual funds that invest in bonds are subject to certain risks, including interest-rate risk, credit risk, and inflation risk. As interest rates rise, the prices of bonds fall. Long-term bonds are more exposed to interest-rate risk than short-term bonds. Unlike bonds, bond funds have ongoing fees and expenses. Lower-rated bonds may offer higher yields in return for more risk. Tax-free funds may not be suitable for IRAs and other non-taxable accounts.
Please note that the holdings discussed in this report may not have been held by the fund for the entire period. Portfolio composition is subject to review in accordance with the fund’s investment strategy and may vary in the future.
11
Your fund’s performance
This section shows your fund’s performance, price, and distribution information for periods ended January 31, 2008, the end of the first half of its current fiscal year. In accordance with regulatory requirements for mutual funds, we also include performance as of the most recent calendar quarter-end and expense information taken from the fund’s current prospectus. Performance should always be considered in light of a fund’s investment strategy. Data represents past performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. More recent returns may be less or more than those shown. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or a loss when you sell your shares. The performance information does not reflect any deductions for taxes that a shareholder may owe on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. For the most recent month-end performance, please visit the Individual Investors section of www.putnam. com or call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund performance
Total return for periods ended 1/31/08
| | | | | | | | | |
| Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class M | | Class Y |
(inception dates) | (9/20/93) | | (9/9/85) | | (2/1/99) | | (12/29/94) | | (1/2/08) |
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP | NAV |
|
Annual average | | | | | | | | | |
(life of fund) | 6.56% | 6.36% | 6.15% | 6.15% | 5.71% | 5.71% | 6.33% | 6.17% | 6.16% |
|
10 years | 47.32 | 41.53 | 39.09 | 39.09 | 36.09 | 36.09 | 43.13 | 38.40 | 39.16 |
Annual average | 3.95 | 3.53 | 3.35 | 3.35 | 3.13 | 3.13 | 3.65 | 3.30 | 3.36 |
|
5 years | 29.55 | 24.36 | 25.54 | 23.54 | 24.63 | 24.63 | 27.69 | 23.49 | 25.62 |
Annual average | 5.31 | 4.46 | 4.65 | 4.32 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.01 | 4.31 | 4.67 |
|
3 years | 12.61 | 8.09 | 10.47 | 7.53 | 9.98 | 9.98 | 11.62 | 8.03 | 10.55 |
Annual average | 4.04 | 2.63 | 3.37 | 2.45 | 3.22 | 3.22 | 3.73 | 2.61 | 3.40 |
|
1 year | 1.28 | –2.72 | 0.69 | –4.14 | 0.59 | –0.38 | 1.00 | –2.31 | 0.75 |
|
6 months | 0.32 | –3.70 | 0.01 | –4.89 | 0.05 | –0.93 | 0.21 | –3.07 | 0.08 |
|
Current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted past performance, which cannot guarantee future results. After sales charge returns (public offering price, or POP) for class A and M shares reflect a maximum 4.00% and 3.25% load, respectively, as of 1/2/08. Class B share returns reflect the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC), which is 5% in the first year, declining to 1% in the sixth year, and is eliminated thereafter. Class C shares reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year that is eliminated thereafter. Class Y shares have no initial sales charge or CDSC. Performance for class C and Y shares before their inception is derived from the historical performance of class B shares, adjusted for the applicable sales charge (or CDSC) and, except for class A and Y shares, the higher operating expenses for such shares.
For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which returns would have been lower.
A 1% short-term trading fee may be applied to shares exchanged or sold within 7 days of purchase.
12
Comparative index returns
For periods ended 1/31/08
| | | | |
| | |
| | | Lipper High Yield |
| | Lehman Municipal | | Municipal Debt Funds |
| | Bond Index | | category average* |
|
Annual average | | |
(life of fund) | 7.40% | 6.58% |
|
10 years | 66.02 | 47.86 |
Annual average | 5.20 | 3.97 |
|
5 years | 25.30 | 27.03 |
Annual average | 4.61 | 4.89 |
|
3 years | 12.54 | 10.21 |
Annual average | 4.02 | 3.28 |
|
1 year | 4.93 | –2.21 |
|
6 months | 3.71 | –2.75 |
|
Index and Lipper results should be compared to fund performance at net asset value.
* Over the 6-month, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and life-of-fund periods ended 1/31/08, there were 104, 96, 81, 77, 46, and 6 funds, respectively, in this Lipper category.
Fund performance as of most recent calendar quarter
Total return for periods ended 12/31/07
| | | | | | | | | |
| Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class M | | Class Y |
(inception dates) | (9/20/93) | | (9/9/85) | | (2/1/99) | | (12/29/94) | | (1/2/08) |
| NAV | POP | NAV | CDSC | NAV | CDSC | NAV | POP | NAV |
|
Annual average | | | | | | | | | |
(life of fund) | 6.52% | 6.32% | 6.11% | 6.11% | 5.67% | 5.67% | 6.29% | 6.13% | 6.11% |
|
10 years | 46.60 | 40.81 | 38.48 | 38.48 | 35.37 | 35.37 | 42.37 | 37.81 | 38.45 |
Annual average | 3.90 | 3.48 | 3.31 | 3.31 | 3.07 | 3.07 | 3.60 | 3.26 | 3.31 |
|
5 years | 27.69 | 22.61 | 23.75 | 21.76 | 22.76 | 22.76 | 25.85 | 21.73 | 23.75 |
Annual average | 5.01 | 4.16 | 4.35 | 4.02 | 4.19 | 4.19 | 4.71 | 4.01 | 4.35 |
|
3 years | 12.38 | 7.92 | 10.31 | 7.38 | 9.78 | 9.78 | 11.37 | 7.81 | 10.29 |
Annual average | 3.97 | 2.57 | 3.32 | 2.40 | 3.16 | 3.16 | 3.65 | 2.54 | 3.32 |
|
1 year | –0.09 | –4.09 | –0.66 | –5.43 | –0.77 | –1.72 | –0.36 | –3.62 | –0.68 |
|
6 months | –0.66 | –4.63 | –0.95 | –5.79 | –0.99 | –1.96 | –0.75 | –4.02 | –0.95 |
|
13
Fund price and distribution information
For the six-month period ended 1/31/08
| | | | | | | |
Distributions | Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Number | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 |
|
Income1 | $0.309478 | $0.269542 | $0.259776 | $0.291571 | $0.055285 |
|
Capital gains2 | — | — | — | — | — |
|
Total | $0.309478 | $0.269542 | $0.259776 | $0.291571 | $0.055285 |
|
Share value: | NAV | POP* | NAV | NAV | NAV | POP | NAV |
|
7/31/07 | $12.88 | $13.42 | $12.90 | $12.88 | $12.88 | $13.31 | — |
|
1/2/083 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $12.49 |
|
1/31/08 | 12.61 | 13.14 | 12.63 | 12.62 | 12.61 | 13.03 | 12.61 |
|
Current yield | | | | | | | |
(end of period) | | | | | | | |
|
Current dividend rate4 | 4.95% | 4.75% | 4.32% | 4.17% | 4.67% | 4.52% | 5.01% |
|
Taxable equivalent5 | 7.62 | 7.31 | 6.65 | 6.42 | 7.18 | 6.95 | 7.71 |
|
Current 30-day | | | | | | | |
SEC yield6,7 (with | | | | | | | |
expense limitation) | N/A | 4.28 | 3.84 | 3.68 | N/A | 4.05 | 4.48 |
|
Taxable equivalent5 | N/A | 6.58 | 5.91 | 5.66 | N/A | 6.23 | 6.89 |
|
Current 30-day | | | | | | | |
SEC yield7 (without | | | | | | | |
expense limitation) | N/A | 4.28 | 3.83 | 3.68 | N/A | 4.05 | 4.48 |
|
The classification of distributions, if any, is an estimate. Final distribution information will appear on your year-end tax forms.
* Reflects an increase in sales charges that took effect on 1/2/08.
1 For some investors, investment income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.
2 Capital gains, if any, are taxable for federal and, in most cases, state purposes.
3 Inception date of class Y shares.
4 Most recent distribution, excluding capital gains, annualized and divided by NAV or POP at end of period.
5 Assumes a maximum 35% federal and state combined tax rate for 2008. Results for investors subject to lower tax rates would not be as advantageous.
6 For a portion of the periods, this fund may have limited expenses, without which yields would have been lower.
7 Based only on investment income and calculated using the maximum offering price for each share class, in accordance with SEC guidelines.
Fund’s annual operating expenses
For the fiscal year ended 7/31/07
| | | | | |
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Total annual fund operating expenses | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.10% | 0.60% |
|
Expense information in this table is taken from the most recent prospectus, is subject to change, and may differ from that shown in the next section and in the financial highlights of this report. Expenses are shown as a percentage of average net assets.
14
Your fund’s expenses
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees, distribution fees (12b-1 fees), and other expenses. In the most recent six-month period, your fund limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds. You may also pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial representative.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund from August 1, 2007, to January 31, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | | | |
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000* | $ 4.13 | $ 7.29 | $ 8.05 | $ 5.54 | $ 0.50 |
|
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,003.20 | $1,000.10 | $1,000.50 | $1,002.10 | $1,014.00 |
|
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 1/31/08 (except for Class Y shares, which is for the period January 2, 2008 (commencement of operations) to January 31, 2008). The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Estimate the expenses you paid
To estimate the ongoing expenses you paid for the six months ended January 31, 2008, use the calculation method below. To find the value of your investment on August 1, 2007, call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581.
15
Compare expenses using the SEC’s method
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total costs) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | | | |
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Expenses paid per $1,000* | $ 4.17 | $ 7.35 | $ 8.11 | $ 5.58 | $ 0.49 |
|
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,021.01 | $1,017.85 | $1,017.09 | $1,019.61 | $1,003.61 |
|
* Expenses for each share class are calculated using the fund’s annualized expense ratio for each class, which represents the ongoing expenses as a percentage of average net assets for the six months ended 1/31/08 (except for Class Y shares, which is for the period January 2, 2008 (commencement of operations) to January 31, 2008). The expense ratio may differ for each share class (see the last table in this section). Expenses are calculated by multiplying the expense ratio by the average account value for the period; then multiplying the result by the number of days in the period; and then dividing that result by the number of days in the year.
Compare expenses using industry averages
You can also compare your fund’s expenses with the average of its peer group, as defined by Lipper, an independent fund-rating agency that ranks funds relative to others that Lipper considers to have similar investment styles or objectives. The expense ratio for each share class shown below indicates how much of your fund’s average net assets have been used to pay ongoing expenses during the period.
| | | | | |
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class M | Class Y |
|
Your fund's annualized | | | | | |
expense ratio | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.10% | 0.60% |
|
Average annualized expense | | | | | |
ratio for Lipper peer group* | 0.82% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.10% | 0.60% |
|
* Putnam is committed to keeping fund expenses below the Lipper peer group average expense ratio and will limit fund expenses if they exceed the Lipper average. The Lipper average is a simple average of front-end load funds in the peer group that excludes 12b-1 fees as well as any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. To facilitate the comparison in this presentation, Putnam has adjusted the Lipper average to reflect the 12b-1 fees carried by each class of shares other than class Y shares, which do not incur 12b-1 fees. Investors should note that the other funds in the peer group may be significantly smaller or larger than the fund, and that an asset-weighted average would likely be lower than the simple average. Also, the fund and Lipper report expense data at different times and for different periods. The fund’s expense ratio shown here is annualized data for the most rec ent six-month period, while the quarterly updated Lipper average is based on the most recent fiscal year-end data available for the peer group funds as of 12/31/07.
16
Your fund’s
portfolio turnover
Putnam funds are actively managed by teams of experts who buy and sell securities based on intensive analysis of companies, industries, economies, and markets. Portfolio turnover is a measure of how often your fund’s managers buy and sell securities for your fund. A portfolio turnover of 100%, for example, means that the managers sold and replaced securities valued at 100% of a fund’s average portfolio value within a given period. Funds with high turnover may be more likely to generate capital gains that must be distributed to shareholders as taxable income. High turnover may also cause a fund to pay more brokerage commissions and other transaction costs, which may detract from performance.
Funds that invest in bonds or other fixed-income instruments may have higher turnover than funds that invest only in stocks. Short-term bond funds tend to have higher turnover than longer-term bond funds, because shorter-term bonds will mature or be sold more frequently than longer-term bonds. You can use the table below to compare your fund’s turnover with the average turnover for funds in its Lipper category.
Turnover comparisons
Percentage of holdings that change every year
| | | | | |
| 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
|
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund | 10% | 17% | 21% | 18% | 29% |
|
Lipper High Yield Municipal | | | | | |
Debt Funds category average | 34% | 32% | 33% | 30% | 30% |
|
Turnover data for the fund is calculated based on the fund’s fiscal-year period, which ends on July 31. Turnover data for the fund’s Lipper category is calculated based on the average of the turnover of each fund in the category for its fiscal year ended during the indicated year. Fiscal years vary across funds in the Lipper category, which may limit the comparability of the fund’s portfolio turnover rate to the Lipper average. Comparative data for 2007 is based on information available as of 12/31/07.
17
Your fund’s risk
This risk comparison is designed to help you understand how your fund compares with other funds. The comparison utilizes a risk measure developed by Morningstar, an independent fund-rating agency. This risk measure is referred to as the fund’s Morningstar Risk.
Your fund’s Morningstar® Risk
Your fund’s Morningstar Risk is shown alongside that of the average fund in its Morningstar category. The risk bar broadens the comparison by translating the fund’s Morningstar Risk into a percentile, which is based on the fund’s ranking among all funds rated by Morningstar as of December 31, 2007. A higher Morningstar Risk generally indicates that a fund’s monthly returns have varied more widely.
Morningstar determines a fund’s Morningstar Risk by assessing variations in the fund’s monthly returns — with an emphasis on downside variations — over a 3-year period, if available. Those measures are weighted and averaged to produce the fund’s Morningstar Risk. The information shown is provided for the fund’s class A shares only; information for other classes may vary. Morningstar Risk is based on historical data and does not indicate future results. Morningstar does not purport to measure the risk associated with a current investment in a fund, either on an absolute basis or on a relative basis. Low Morningstar Risk does not mean that you cannot lose money on an investment in a fund. Copyright 2007 Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete, or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.
18
Your fund’s management
Your fund is managed by the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt Fixed-Income Team. Paul Drury is the Portfolio Leader, and Brad Libby, Susan McCormack, and Thalia Meehan are Portfolio Members, of your fund. The Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members coordinate the team’s management of the fund.
For a complete listing of the members of the Putnam Tax Exempt Fixed-Income Team, including those who are not Portfolio Leaders or Portfolio Members of your fund, visit the Individual Investors section of www.putnam.com.
Investment team fund ownership
The table below shows how much the fund’s current Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members have invested in the fund and in all Putnam mutual funds (in dollar ranges). Information shown is as of January 31, 2008, and January 31, 2007.
Trustee and Putnam employee fund ownership
As of January 31, 2008, all of the Trustees of the Putnam funds owned fund shares. The table below shows the approximate value of investments in the fund and all Putnam funds as of that date by the Trustees and Putnam employees. These amounts include investments by the Trustees’ and employees’ immediate family members and investments through retirement and deferred compensation plans.
| | |
| | Total assets in |
| Assets in the fund | all Putnam funds |
|
Trustees | $105,000 | $ 90,000,000 |
|
Putnam employees | $106,000 | $669,000,000 |
|
19
Other Putnam funds managed by the Portfolio Leader and Portfolio Members
Paul Drury is the Portfolio Leader, and Brad Libby, Susan McCormack, and Thalia Meehan are Portfolio Members, of Putnam High Yield Municipal Trust and Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust.
Thalia Meehan is the Portfolio Leader, and Paul Drury, Brad Libby, and Susan McCormack are Portfolio Members, of Putnam’s open-end tax-exempt funds for the following states: Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. The same group also manages Putnam AMT-Free Insured Municipal Fund, Putnam Investment Grade Municipal Trust, Putnam Municipal Bond Fund, Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust, and Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund.
Paul Drury, Brad Libby, Susan McCormack, and Thalia Meehan may also manage other accounts and variable trust funds advised by Putnam Management or an affiliate.
Terms and definitions
Important terms
Total return shows how the value of the fund’s shares changed over time, assuming you held the shares through the entire period and reinvested all distributions in the fund.
Net asset value (NAV) is the price, or value, of one share of a mutual fund, without a sales charge. NAVs fluctuate with market conditions. NAV is calculated by dividing the net assets of each class of shares by the number of outstanding shares in the class.
Public offering price (POP) is the price of a mutual fund share plus the maximum sales charge levied at the time of purchase. POP performance figures shown here assume the 4.00% maximum sales charge for class A shares and 3.25% for class M shares.
Contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) is generally a charge applied at the time of the redemption of class B or C shares and assumes redemption at the end of the period. Your fund’s class B CDSC declines from a 5% maximum during the first year to 1% during the sixth year. After the sixth year, the CDSC no longer applies. The CDSC for class C shares is 1% for one year after purchase.
Current yield is the annual rate of return earned from dividends or interest of an investment. Current yield is expressed as a percentage of the price of a security, fund share, or principal investment.
20
Share classes
Class A shares are generally subject to an initial sales charge and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).
Class B shares are not subject to an initial sales charge. They may be subject to a CDSC.
Class C shares are not subject to an initial sales charge and are subject to a CDSC only if the shares are redeemed during the first year.
Class M shares have a lower initial sales charge and a higher 12b-1 fee than class A shares and no CDSC (except on certain redemptions of shares bought without an initial sales charge).
Class Y shares are not subject to an initial sales charge or CDSC, and carry no 12b-1 fee. They are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.
Comparative indexes
Lehman Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index of U.S. investment-grade fixed-income securities.
Lehman Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of long-term fixed-rate investment-grade tax-exempt bonds.
Merrill Lynch 91-Day Treasury Bill Index is an unmanaged index that seeks to measure the performance of U.S. Treasury bills available in the marketplace.
S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stock performance.
Indexes assume reinvestment of all distributions and do not account for fees. Securities and performance of a fund and an index will differ. You cannot invest directly in an index.
Lipper is a third-party industry-ranking entity that ranks mutual funds. Its rankings do not reflect sales charges. Lipper rankings are based on total return at net asset value relative to other funds that have similar current investment styles or objectives as determined by Lipper. Lipper may change a fund’s category assignment at its discretion. Lipper category averages reflect performance trends for funds within a category.
21
Trustee approval of
management contract
General conclusions
The Board of Trustees of the Putnam funds oversees the management of each fund and, as required by law, determines annually whether to approve the continuance of your fund’s management contract with Putnam Investment Management (“Putnam Management”). In this regard, the Board of Trustees, with the assistance of its Contract Committee consisting solely of Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as such term is defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of the Putnam funds (the “Independent Trustees”), requests and evaluates all information it deems reasonably necessary under the circumstances. Over the course of several months ending in June 2007, the Contract Committee met several times to consider the information provided by Putnam Management and other information developed with the assistance of the Board’s independent counsel and independent staff. The Contract Committee reviewed and discussed key aspects of this information with all of the Independent Trustees. The Contract Committee recommended, and the Independent Trustees approved, the continuance of your fund’s management contract, effective July 1, 2007.
In addition, in anticipation of the sale of Putnam Investments to Great-West Lifeco, at a series of meetings ending in March 2007, the Trustees reviewed and approved new management and distribution arrangements to take effect upon the change of control. Shareholders of all funds approved the management contracts in May 2007, and the change of control transaction was completed on August 3, 2007. Upon the change of control, the management contracts that were approved by the Trustees in June 2007 automatically terminated and were replaced by new contracts that had been approved by shareholders. In connection with their review for the June 2007 continuance of the Putnam funds’ management contracts, the Trustees did not identify any facts or circumstances that would alter the substance of the conclusions and recommendations they made in their review of the contracts to take effect upon the change of control.
The Independent Trustees’ approval was based on the following conclusions:
• That the fee schedule in effect for your fund represented reasonable compensation in light of the nature and quality of the services being provided to the fund, the fees paid by competitive funds and the costs incurred by Putnam Management in providing such services, and
• That this fee schedule represented an appropriate sharing between fund shareholders and Putnam Management of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the fund at current asset levels.
These conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and were not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations and how the Trustees considered these factors are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for your fund and the other Putnam funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Trustees and Putnam Management, that
22
certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements in prior years.
Management fee schedules and categories; total expenses
The Trustees reviewed the management fee schedules in effect for all Putnam funds, including fee levels and breakpoints, and the assignment of funds to particular fee categories. In reviewing fees and expenses, the Trustees generally focused their attention on material changes in circumstances — for example, changes in a fund’s size or investment style, changes in Putnam Management’s operating costs or responsibilities, or changes in competitive practices in the mutual fund industry — that suggest that consideration of fee changes might be warranted. The Trustees concluded that the circumstances did not warrant changes to the management fee structure of your fund, which had been carefully developed over the years, re-examined on many occasions and adjusted where appropriate. The Trustees focused on two areas of particular interest, as discussed further below:
• Competitiveness. The Trustees reviewed comparative fee and expense information for competitive funds, which indicated that, in a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper Inc., your fund ranked in the 38th percentile in management fees and in the 19th percentile in total expenses (less any applicable 12b-1 fees) as of December 31, 2006 (the first percentile being the least expensive funds and the 100th percentile being the most expensive funds). (Because the fund’s custom peer group is smaller than the fund’s broad Lipper Inc. peer group, this expense information may differ from the Lipper peer expense information found elsewhere in this report.) The Trustees noted that expense ratios for a number of Putnam funds, which show the percentage of fund assets used to pay for management and administrative services, distributio n (12b-1) fees and other expenses, had been increasing recently as a result of declining net assets and the natural operation of fee breakpoints.
The Trustees noted that the expense ratio increases described above were currently being controlled by expense limitations implemented in January 2004 and which Putnam Management had committed to maintain at least through 2007. In anticipation of the change of control of Putnam Investments, the Trustees requested, and received a commitment from Putnam Management and Great-West Lifeco, to extend this program through at least June 30, 2009. These expense limitations give effect to a commitment by Putnam Management that the expense ratio of each open-end fund would be no higher than the average expense ratio of the competitive funds included in the fund’s relevant Lipper universe (exclusive of any applicable 12b-1 charges in each case). The Trustees observed that this commitment to limit fund expenses has served shareholders well since its inception.
In order to ensure that the expenses of the Putnam funds continue to meet evolving competitive standards, the Trustees requested, and Putnam Management agreed, to extend for the twelve months beginning July 1, 2007, an additional expense limitation for certain funds at an
23
amount equal to the average expense ratio (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) of a custom peer group of competitive funds selected by Lipper to correspond to the size of the fund. This additional expense limitation will be applied to those open-end funds that had above-average expense ratios (exclusive of 12b-1 charges) based on the custom peer group data for the period ended December 31, 2006. This additional expense limitation will not be applied to your fund because it had a below-average expense ratio relative to its custom peer group.
• Economies of scale. Your fund currently has the benefit of breakpoints in its management fee that provide shareholders with significant economies of scale, which means that the effective management fee rate of a fund (as a percentage of fund assets) declines as a fund grows in size and crosses specified asset thresholds. Conversely, as a fund shrinks in size — as has been the case for many Putnam funds in recent years — these breakpoints result in increasing fee levels. In recent years, the Trustees have examined the operation of the existing breakpoint structure during periods of both growth and decline in asset levels. The Trustees concluded that the fee schedules in effect for the funds represented an appropriate sharing of economies of scale at current asset levels. In reaching this conclusion, the Trustees considered the Contract C ommittee’s stated intent to continue to work with Putnam Management to plan for an eventual resumption in the growth of assets, and to consider the potential economies that might be produced under various growth assumptions.
In connection with their review of the management fees and total expenses of the Putnam funds, the Trustees also reviewed the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by Putnam Management and its affiliates from the relationship with the funds. This information included trends in revenues, expenses and profitability of Putnam Management and its affiliates relating to the investment management and distribution services provided to the funds. In this regard, the Trustees also reviewed an analysis of Putnam Management’s revenues, expenses and profitability with respect to the funds’ management contracts, allocated on a fund-by-fund basis.
Investment performance
The quality of the investment process provided by Putnam Management represented a major factor in the Trustees’ evaluation of the quality of services provided by Putnam Management under your fund’s management contract. The Trustees were assisted in their review of the Putnam funds’ investment process and performance by the work of the Investment Process Committee of the Trustees and the Investment Oversight Committees of the Trustees, which had met on a regular monthly basis with the funds’ portfolio teams throughout the year. The Trustees concluded that Putnam Management generally provides a high-quality investment process — as measured by the experience and skills of the individuals assigned to the management of fund portfolios, the resources made available to such personnel, and in general the ability of Putnam Management to attract and retain high-quality personnel — but also recognized that this does not guarantee favorable investm ent results for every fund in every
24
time period. The Trustees considered the investment performance of each fund over multiple time periods and considered information comparing each fund’s performance with various benchmarks and with the performance of competitive funds.
The Trustees noted the satisfactory investment performance of many Putnam funds. They also noted the disappointing investment performance of certain funds in recent years and discussed with senior management of Putnam Management the factors contributing to such underperfor-mance and actions being taken to improve performance. The Trustees recognized that, in recent years, Putnam Management has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes and in the fund product line to address areas of underperformance. In particular, they noted the important contributions of Putnam Management’s leadership in attracting, retaining and supporting high-quality investment professionals and in systematically implementing an investment process that seeks to merge the best features of fundamental and quantitative analysis. The Trustees indicated their intention to continue to monitor performance trends to assess the effectiveness of these changes and to evaluate whether additional changes to address areas of underperformance are warranted.
In the case of your fund, the Trustees considered that your fund’s class A share cumulative total return performance at net asset value was in the following percentiles of its Lipper Inc. peer group (Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds) (compared using tax-adjusted performance to recognize the different federal income tax treatment for capital gains distributions and exempt-interest distributions) for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2007 (the first percentile being the best-performing funds and the 100th percentile being the worst-performing funds):
| | |
One-year period | Three-year period | Five-year period |
|
62nd | 48th | 54th |
(Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods shown elsewhere in this report. Over the one-, three- and five-year periods ended March 31, 2007, there were 82, 77, and 70 funds, respectively, in your fund’s Lipper peer group.* Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.)
As a general matter, the Trustees concluded that cooperative efforts between the Trustees and Putnam Management represent the most effective way to address investment performance problems. The Trustees noted that investors in the Putnam funds have, in effect, placed their trust in the Putnam organization, under the oversight of the funds’ Trustees, to make appropriate decisions regarding the management of the funds. Based on the responsiveness of Putnam Management in the recent past to Trustee concerns about investment performance, the Trustees concluded that it is preferable to seek change within Putnam Management to
* The percentile rankings for your fund’s class A share annualized total return performance in the Lipper High Yield Municipal Debt Funds category for the one-, five-, and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2007, were 12%, 32%, and 55%, respectively. Over the one-, five-, and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2007, the fund ranked 11 out of 96, 24 out of 75, and 24 out of 43 funds, respectively. Note that this more recent information was not available when the Trustees approved the continuance of your fund’s management contract.
25
address performance shortcomings. In the Trustees’ view, the alternative of terminating a management contract and engaging a new investment adviser for an underperforming fund would entail significant disruptions and would not provide any greater assurance of improved investment performance.
Brokerage and soft-dollar allocations; other benefits
The Trustees considered various potential benefits that Putnam Management may receive in connection with the services it provides under the management contract with your fund. These include benefits related to brokerage and soft-dollar allocations, whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research services that may be useful to Putnam Management in managing the assets of the fund and of other clients. The Trustees indicated their continued intent to monitor the potential benefits associated with the allocation of fund brokerage to ensure that the principle of seeking “best price and execution” remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
The Trustees’ annual review of your fund’s management contract also included the review of its distributor’s contract and distribution plan with Putnam Retail Management Limited Partnership and the custodian agreement and investor servicing agreement with Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), each of which provides benefits to affiliates of Putnam Management. In the case of the custodian agreement, the Trustees considered that, effective January 1, 2007, the Putnam funds had engaged State Street Bank and Trust Company as custodian and began to transition the responsibility for providing custody services away from PFTC.
Comparison of retail and institutional fee schedules
The information examined by the Trustees as part of their annual contract review has included for many years information regarding fees charged by Putnam Management and its affiliates to institutional clients such as defined benefit pension plans, college endowments, etc. This information included comparison of such fees with fees charged to the funds, as well as a detailed assessment of the differences in the services provided to these two types of clients. The Trustees observed, in this regard, that the differences in fee rates between institutional clients and the funds are by no means uniform when examined by individual asset sectors, suggesting that differences in the pricing of investment management services to these types of clients reflect to a substantial degree historical competitive forces operating in separate market places. The Trustees considered the fact that fee rates across all asset sectors are higher on average for funds than for institutional clients, as well as the differences between the services that Putnam Management provides to the Putnam funds and those that it provides to institutional clients of the firm, but did not rely on such comparisons to any significant extent in concluding that the management fees paid by your fund are reasonable.
26
Other information
for shareholders
Important notice regarding delivery of shareholder documents
In accordance with SEC regulations, Putnam sends a single copy of annual and semiannual shareholder reports, prospectuses, and proxy statements to Putnam shareholders who share the same address, unless a shareholder requests otherwise. If you prefer to receive your own copy of these documents, please call Putnam at 1-800-225-1581, and Putnam will begin sending individual copies within 30 days.
Proxy voting
Putnam is committed to managing our mutual funds in the best interests of our shareholders. The Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures, as well as information regarding how your fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30, 2007, are available on the Putnam Individual Investor Web site, www.putnam.com/individual, and on the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. If you have questions about finding forms on the SEC’s Web site, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. You may also obtain the Putnam funds’ proxy voting guidelines and procedures at no charge by calling Putnam’s Shareholder Services at 1-800-225-1581.
Fund portfolio holdings
The fund will file a complete schedule of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may obtain the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s Web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, the fund’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for information about the SEC’s Web site or the operation of the Public Reference Room.
27
Financial statements
A guide to financial statements
These sections of the report, as well as the accompanying Notes, constitute the fund’s financial statements.
The fund’s portfolio lists all the fund’s investments and their values as of the last day of the reporting period. Holdings are organized by asset type and industry sector, country, or state to show areas of concentration and diversification.
Statement of assets and liabilities shows how the fund’s net assets and share price are determined. All investment and noninvestment assets are added together. Any unpaid expenses and other liabilities are subtracted from this total. The result is divided by the number of shares to determine the net asset value per share, which is calculated separately for each class of shares. (For funds with preferred shares, the amount subtracted from total assets includes the liquidation preference of preferred shares.)
Statement of operations shows the fund’s net investment gain or loss. This is done by first adding up all the fund’s earnings — from dividends and interest income — and subtracting its operating expenses to determine net investment income (or loss). Then, any net gain or loss the fund realized on the sales of its holdings — as well as any unrealized gains or losses over the period — is added to or subtracted from the net investment result to determine the fund’s net gain or loss for the fiscal period.
Statement of changes in net assets shows how the fund’s net assets were affected by the fund’s net investment gain or loss, by distributions to shareholders, and by changes in the number of the fund’s shares. It lists distributions and their sources (net investment income or realized capital gains) over the current reporting period and the most recent fiscal year-end. The distributions listed here may not match the sources listed in the Statement of operations because the distributions are determined on a tax basis and may be paid in a different period from the one in which they were earned. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. Actual results may vary. Any non-taxable return of capital cannot be determined until final tax calculations are completed after the end of the fund’s fiscal year.
Financial highlights provide an overview of the fund’s investment results, per-share distributions, expense ratios, net investment income ratios, and portfolio turnover in one summary table, reflecting the five most recent reporting periods. In a semiannual report, the highlight table also includes the current reporting period.
28
The fund’s portfolio 1/31/08 (Unaudited)
| |
Key to abbreviations | |
AMBAC AMBAC Indemnity Corporation | FSA Financial Security Assurance |
COP Certificate of Participation | GNMA Coll. Government National Mortgage |
FGIC Financial Guaranty Insurance Company | Association Collateralized |
FHA Insd. Federal Housing Administration Insured | G.O. Bonds General Obligation Bonds |
FHLMC Coll. Federal Home Loan Mortgage | MBIA MBIA Insurance Company |
Corporation Collateralized | PSFG Permanent School Fund Guaranteed |
FNMA Coll. Federal National Mortgage | Radian Insd. Radian Group Insured |
Association Collateralized | U.S. Govt. Coll. U.S. Government Collateralized |
FRB Floating Rate Bonds | VRDN Variable Rate Demand Notes |
FRN Floating Rate Notes | XLCA XL Capital Assurance |
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* | | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Alabama (1.3%) | | | | | |
Courtland, Indl. Dev. Board Solid Waste | | | | | |
Disp. Rev. Bonds (Intl. Paper Co.), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5.2s, 6/1/25 | BBB | $ | 3,500,000 | $ | 3,229,870 |
Jackson Cnty., Hlth. Care Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, 5.7s, 5/1/19 | BB+ | | 8,675,000 | | 8,730,086 |
Montgomery, Med. Clinic Board Hlth. Care | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Jackson Hosp. & Clinic), | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 3/1/36 | Baa2 | | 1,955,000 | | 1,848,101 |
Sylacauga, Hlth. Care Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Coosa Valley Med. Ctr.), Ser. A | | | | | |
6s, 8/1/35 | B/P | | 750,000 | | 719,828 |
6s, 8/1/25 | B/P | | 1,700,000 | | 1,672,902 |
| | | | | 16,200,787 |
|
|
Arizona (2.0%) | | | | | |
AZ Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Bethesda Foundation), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6.4s, 8/15/27 | BB–/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,504,485 |
Casa Grande, Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Casa Grande Regl. Med. Ctr.), Ser. A | | | | | |
7 5/8s, 12/1/29 | BB–/P | | 7,300,000 | | 7,673,322 |
7 1/4s, 12/1/19 | BB–/P | | 500,000 | | 528,210 |
Cochise Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Sierra Vista Regl. Hlth. Ctr.), | | | | | |
7 3/4s, 12/1/30 | BB+/P | | 3,170,000 | | 3,370,249 |
(Sierra Vista Cmnty. Hosp.), 6.45s, 12/1/17 | BB+/P | | 2,240,000 | | 2,375,946 |
(Sierra Vista Regl. Hlth. Ctr.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6.2s, 12/1/21 | BB+/P | | 935,000 | | 959,684 |
29
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Arizona continued | | | | | |
Glendale, Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(John C. Lincoln Hlth.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 12/1/19 | BBB | $ | 500,000 | $ | 516,800 |
Navajo Cnty., Indl. Dev. Rev. Bonds (Stone | | | | | |
Container Corp.), 7.2s, 6/1/27 | B/P | | 2,500,000 | | 2,512,425 |
Phoenix, Indl. Dev. Auth. VRDN (Valley | | | | | |
of the Sun YMCA), 2s, 1/1/31 | A–1+ | | 2,822,743 | | 2,822,743 |
Pima Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Horizon Cmnty. Learning Ctr.), | | | | | |
5.05s, 6/1/25 | BBB | | 2,450,000 | | 2,296,459 |
| | | | | 24,560,323 |
|
|
Arkansas (1.3%) | | | | | |
AR State Hosp. Dev. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Washington Regl. Med. Ctr.), 7 3/8s, | | | | | |
2/1/29 (Prerefunded) | Baa2 | | 10,500,000 | | 11,502,120 |
Independence Cnty., Poll. Control Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Entergy AR, Inc.), 5s, 1/1/21 | A– | | 1,500,000 | | 1,501,275 |
Little River Cnty., Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Georgia-Pacific Corp.), 5.6s, 10/1/26 | B2 | | 1,290,000 | | 1,133,794 |
Washington Cnty., Hosp. Rev. Bonds (Regl. | | | | | |
Med. Ctr.), Ser. B, 5s, 2/1/25 | Baa2 | | 1,750,000 | | 1,697,378 |
| | | | | 15,834,567 |
|
|
California (8.6%) | | | | | |
ABAG Fin. Auth. COP (American Baptist | | | | | |
Homes), Ser. A, 5.85s, 10/1/27 | BBB– | | 3,000,000 | | 3,018,960 |
CA Hlth. Fac. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (CA-NV | | | | | |
Methodist), 5s, 7/1/26 | A+ | | 260,000 | | 263,910 |
CA Infrastructure & Econ. Dev. Bank | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, ACA, zero %, 12/1/24 | B/P | | 2,000,000 | | 575,840 |
(Cap. Appn.), Ser. A, ACA, zero %, 12/1/23 | B/P | | 2,000,000 | | 624,820 |
CA Muni. Fin. Auth. COP (Cmnty. Hosp. | | | | | |
Central CA), 5 1/4s, 2/1/46 | Baa2 | | 7,000,000 | | 6,391,910 |
CA Poll. Control Fin. Auth. Solid Waste | | | | | |
Disp. FRB (Waste Management, Inc.), | | | | | |
Ser. C, 5 1/8s, 11/1/23 | BBB | | 5,000,000 | | 4,855,000 |
CA Poll. Control Fin. Auth. Solid Waste | | | | | |
Disp. Rev. Bonds (Waste Management, | | | | | |
Inc.), Ser. A-2, 5.4s, 4/1/25 | BBB | | 4,500,000 | | 4,415,805 |
CA Statewide Cmnty. Dev. Auth. Special Tax | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Citrus Garden Apt. Project - | | | | | |
D1), 5 1/4s, 7/1/22 | A | | 1,000,000 | | 1,019,050 |
Cathedral City, Impt. Board Act of 1915 | | | | | |
Special Assmt. Bonds (Cove Impt. Dist.), | | | | | |
Ser. 04-02 | | | | | |
5.05s, 9/2/35 | BB+/P | | 1,830,000 | | 1,635,270 |
5s, 9/2/30 | BB+/P | | 1,730,000 | | 1,560,962 |
30
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
California continued | | | | | |
Chula Vista, Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special Tax | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 07-1 Otay Ranch Village Eleven), | | | | | |
5.8s, 9/1/28 | BB–/P | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 1,971,100 |
(No. 07-I Otay Ranch Village Eleven), | | | | | |
5.1s, 9/1/26 | BB/P | | 375,000 | | 342,195 |
Commerce, Redev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Project 1), zero %, 8/1/21 (Prerefunded) | BBB | | 1,500,000 | | 716,610 |
Corona, COP (Vista Hosp. Syst.), zero %, | | | | | |
7/1/29 (In default) (F) † | D/P | | 31,900,000 | | 350,900 |
Foothill/Eastern Corridor Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(CA Toll Roads), 5 3/4s, 1/15/40 | Baa3 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,525,815 |
Gilroy, Rev. Bonds (Bonfante Gardens | | | | | |
Park), 8s, 11/1/25 | B–/P | | 4,218,000 | | 4,123,643 |
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A-1, 5s, 6/1/33 | BBB | | 6,950,000 | | 6,107,660 |
Irvine, Impt. Board Act of 1915 Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
(Dist. No. 03-19) 5s, 9/2/29 | BB/P | | 1,775,000 | | 1,630,018 |
(Dist. No. 03-19) 5s, 9/2/25 | BB/P | | 1,350,000 | | 1,260,090 |
(No. 00-18 Group 3), 5.55s, 9/2/26 | BBB–/P | | 995,000 | | 998,264 |
(No. 03-19 Group 4), 5s, 9/2/29 | BB+/P | | 705,000 | | 651,547 |
North Natomas, Cmnty. Fac. Special | | | | | |
Tax Bonds | | | | | |
(Dist. No. 4), Ser. D, 5s, 9/1/33 | BBB–/P | | 350,000 | | 315,046 |
Ser. D, 5s, 9/1/26 | BBB–/P | | 1,100,000 | | 1,012,429 |
Norwalk-La Mirada, Unified School Dist. | | | | | |
G.O. Bonds, Ser. B, FGIC | | | | | |
zero %, 8/1/29 | Aaa | | 13,335,000 | | 4,378,814 |
zero %, 8/1/24 | Aaa | | 10,350,000 | | 4,614,134 |
Oakley, Pub. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
5 7/8s, 9/2/24 | BB–/P | | 1,370,000 | | 1,369,493 |
Orange Cnty., Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Tax Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 03-1 Ladera Ranch), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5.4s, 8/15/21 | BB/P | | 1,240,000 | | 1,229,534 |
(No. 03-1 Ladera Ranch), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5.4s, 8/15/22 | BB/P | | 1,520,000 | | 1,498,918 |
(No. 02-1 Ladera Ranch) | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5.55s, 8/15/33 | BBB/P | | 2,875,000 | | 2,794,730 |
Orange Cnty., Local Trans. Auth. Sales Tax | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, 6.2s, 2/14/11 | AA+ | | 11,200,000 | | 12,190,640 |
Poway, Unified School Dist. Cmnty. Facs. | | | | | |
Special Tax Bonds | | | | | |
(Cmnty. Fac. Dist. No. 14-Del Sur), | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 9/1/26 | BB–/P | | 2,200,000 | | 1,930,170 |
Rancho Mirage, JT Powers Fin. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Eisenhower Med. Ctr.), 5 7/8s, | | | | | |
7/1/26 (Prerefunded) | A3 | | 1,700,000 | | 1,998,010 |
31
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
California continued | | | | | |
Rocklin, Unified School Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(Election of 2002), FGIC, zero %, 8/1/21 | Aaa | $ | 2,145,000 | $ | 1,155,361 |
Sacramento, Special Tax Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(North Natomas Cmnty. Fac.) | | | | | |
Ser. 97-01, 5.1s, 9/1/35 | BB/P | | 2,920,000 | | 2,662,690 |
Ser. 97-01, 5s, 9/1/29 | BB/P | | 1,370,000 | | 1,243,850 |
Ser. 01-03, 6s, 9/1/28 | BB+/P | | 700,000 | | 706,104 |
San Diego, Assn. of Bay Area Governments | | | | | |
Fin. Auth. For Nonprofit Corps. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (San Diego Hosp.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/8s, 8/15/20 | A– | | 1,100,000 | | 1,148,862 |
San Francisco City & Cnty. Redev. Agcy. | | | | | |
Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special Tax (No. 6 | | | | | |
Mission Bay South), Ser. A, 5.15s, 8/1/35 | BB–/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,338,555 |
San Joaquin Hills, Trans. Corridor Agcy. | | | | | |
Toll Rd. Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 1/15/28 | Ba2 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,443,735 |
Santa Monica, Cmnty. College Dist. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds (Election of 2002), Ser. A, FGIC, | | | | | |
zero %, 8/1/31 | Aaa | | 1,000,000 | | 296,720 |
Santaluz, Cmnty. Facs. Dist. No. 2 Special | | | | | |
Tax Rev. Bonds (Impt. Area No. 1), | | | | | |
Ser. B, 6 3/8s, 9/1/30 | BBB/P | | 6,630,000 | | 6,632,122 |
Sunnyvale, Special Tax Rev. Bonds (Cmnty. | | | | | |
Fac. Dist. No. 1), 7 3/4s, 8/1/32 | BB–/P | | 6,780,000 | | 7,049,912 |
Thousand Oaks, Cmnty. Fac. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Tax Rev. Bonds (Marketplace 94-1), | | | | | |
zero %, 9/1/14 | B/P | | 7,335,000 | | 4,422,051 |
Union, Elementary School Dist. G.O. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. B, FGIC, zero %, 9/1/26 | Aaa | | 2,745,000 | | 1,087,130 |
Washington, Unified School Dist. Yolo | | | | | |
Cnty., G.O. Bonds (Election of 1999), | | | | | |
Ser. B, MBIA | | | | | |
zero %, 8/1/31 | Aaa | | 1,695,000 | | 500,635 |
zero %, 8/1/28 | Aaa | | 1,425,000 | | 500,745 |
zero %, 8/1/27 | Aaa | | 1,340,000 | | 500,276 |
| | | | | 108,060,035 |
|
|
Colorado (1.3%) | | | | | |
CO Edl. & Cultural Fac. Auth. VRDN | | | | | |
(National Jewish Federation Bond), | | | | | |
Ser. A1, 1.9s, 9/1/33 | VMIG1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
CO Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Evangelical Lutheran), 5.9s, 10/1/27 | A3 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,192,900 |
(Christian Living Cmntys.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 1/1/26 | BB–/P | | 1,550,000 | | 1,492,929 |
(Valley View Assn.), 5s, 5/15/27 | BBB | | 2,625,000 | | 2,427,390 |
CO Springs, Hosp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
6 3/8s,12/15/30 | A3 | | 755,000 | | 797,325 |
32
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Colorado continued | | | | | |
Denver, City & Cnty. Special Fac. Arpt. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (United Airlines), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 10/1/32 | B | $ | 675,000 | $ | 578,570 |
Larimer Cnty., G.O. Bonds (Poudre Impt. — | | | | | |
School Dist. No. 1), 7s, 12/15/16 | Aa3 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,709,350 |
| | | | | 16,198,464 |
|
|
Connecticut (0.9%) | | | | | |
CT State Dev. Auth. 1st. Mtg. Gross Rev. | | | | | |
Hlth. Care Rev. Bonds (Elim Street Park | | | | | |
Baptist, Inc.), 5.85s, 12/1/33 | BBB+ | | 2,000,000 | | 2,023,380 |
CT State Dev. Auth. Poll. Control Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Western MA), Ser. A, 5.85s, 9/1/28 | Baa2 | | 7,000,000 | | 7,171,990 |
CT State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. VRDN | | | | | |
(Yale U.), Ser. V-1, 2s, 7/1/36 | VMIG1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 |
| | | | | 11,195,370 |
|
|
Delaware (0.1%) | | | | | |
DE St. Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Beebe | | | | | |
Med. Ctr.), Ser. A, 5s, 6/1/24 | Baa1 | | 900,000 | | 869,724 |
New Castle Cnty., Rev. Bonds (Newark | | | | | |
Charter School, Inc.), 5s, 9/1/36 | BBB- | | 600,000 | | 528,822 |
| | | | | 1,398,546 |
|
|
District of Columbia (0.4%) | | | | | |
DC Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, zero %, 6/15/46 | BBB/F | | 70,000,000 | | 5,054,700 |
|
|
Florida (5.8%) | | | | | |
Aberdeen, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special Assmt. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. 1, 5 1/4s, 11/1/15 | BB–/P | | 1,370,000 | | 1,223,163 |
Alachua Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Auth. Continuing | | | | | |
Care VRDN (Oak Hammock U.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
2s, 10/1/32 | VMIG1 | | 1,960,000 | | 1,960,000 |
CFM Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. Bonds, Ser. B, | | | | | |
5 7/8s, 5/1/14 | BB–/P | | 500,000 | | 453,090 |
Escambia Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Baptist Hosp. & Baptist Manor), | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 10/1/19 | Baa1 | | 1,650,000 | | 1,659,026 |
Fishhawk, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. II Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. B, 5 1/8s, 11/1/09 | BB–/P | | 1,215,000 | | 1,210,419 |
Halifax, Hosp. Med. Ctr. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5s, 6/1/38 | BBB+ | | 3,000,000 | | 2,770,140 |
Heritage Harbour Marketplace Cmnty., Dev. | | | | | |
Dist. Special Assmt., 5.6s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 2,565,000 | | 2,127,924 |
33
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Florida continued | | | | | |
Heritage Isle at Viera, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. | | | | | |
Special Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. B, 5s, 11/1/09 | BB/P | $ | 455,000 | $ | 447,329 |
5s, 11/1/13 | BB/P | | 3,300,000 | | 3,024,186 |
Jacksonville, Econ. Dev. Comm. Hlth. Care | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Proton Therapy Inst.), | | | | | |
Class A, 6s, 9/1/17 | BB/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,519,530 |
Jacksonville, Econ. Dev. Comm. Indl. Dev. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc.), | | | | | |
5.3s, 5/1/37 | Ba1 | | 2,850,000 | | 2,467,701 |
Jacksonville, Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Brooks Hlth. Syst.), 5s, 11/1/27 | A | | 2,930,000 | | 2,872,162 |
Lee Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Hlth. Care | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Shell Pt./Alliance Oblig. Group), 5 1/8s, | | | | | |
11/15/36 | BBB– | | 925,000 | | 813,482 |
(Shell Pt./Alliance Cmnty.), 5s, 11/15/22 | BBB– | | 3,000,000 | | 2,834,850 |
Miami Beach, Hlth. Fac. Auth. Hosp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Mount Sinai Med. Ctr.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6.7s, 11/15/19 | Ba1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,078,160 |
Middle Village Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt., Ser. A, 6s, 5/1/35 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 2,019,440 |
Myrtle Creek, Impt. Dist. Special Assmt. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, 5.2s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 2,245,000 | | 1,750,853 |
Orange Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Orlando Regl. Hlth. Care), U.S. Govt. | | | | | |
Coll., 5 3/4s, 12/1/32 (Prerefunded) | A2 | | 2,700,000 | | 3,055,536 |
(Adventist Hlth. Syst.), 5 5/8s, 11/15/32 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | A1 | | 3,750,000 | | 4,233,563 |
Palm Coast Pk. Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds, 5.7s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 2,700,000 | | 2,242,215 |
Reunion West, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds, 6 1/4s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 5,150,000 | | 4,688,303 |
Sarasota Cnty., Hlth. Fac. Auth. | | | | | |
Retirement Fac. Rev. Bonds (Village On | | | | | |
The Isle), 5 1/2s, 1/1/27 | BBB–/P | | 1,850,000 | | 1,754,152 |
Six Mile Creek, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt., 5 7/8s, 5/1/38 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 1,553,060 |
South Bay, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. B-1, 5 1/8s, 11/1/09 | BB–/P | | 2,050,000 | | 1,948,853 |
South Village, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, 5.7s, 5/1/35 | BB–/P | | 2,920,000 | | 2,454,406 |
Split Pine, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds, Ser. A, 5 1/4s, 5/1/39 | BB–/P | | 4,750,000 | | 3,805,938 |
Tampa Bay, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds (New Port), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 7/8s, 5/1/38 | BB–/P | | 1,900,000 | | 1,243,797 |
34
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Florida continued | | | | | |
Tolomato, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
6.55s, 5/1/27 | BB–/P | $ | 1,300,000 | $ | 1,267,955 |
5.4s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 2,450,000 | | 1,974,872 |
Town Ctr. at Palm Coast Cmnty., Dev. Dist. | | | | | |
Special Assmt., 6s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 1,950,000 | | 1,721,928 |
Verandah, West Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Cap. Impt.), Ser. A, 6 5/8s, 5/1/33 | BB/P | | 940,000 | | 944,202 |
Verano Ctr. Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds (Cmnty. Infrastructure) | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5 3/8s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 1,030,000 | | 781,688 |
Ser. B, 5s, 11/1/13 | BB–/P | | 3,265,000 | | 2,921,849 |
Wentworth Estates, Cmnty. Dev. Dist. | | | | | |
Special Assmt. Bonds, Ser. A, 5 5/8s, 5/1/37 | BB–/P | | 1,995,000 | | 1,465,727 |
World Commerce Cmnty. Dev. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt., Ser. A-1 | | | | | |
6 1/2s, 5/1/36 | BB–/P | | 1,950,000 | | 1,830,407 |
6 1/4s, 5/1/22 | BB–/P | | 1,735,000 | | 1,629,061 |
| | | | | 72,748,967 |
|
|
Georgia (2.1%) | | | | | |
Effingham Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Pacific Corp.), 6 1/2s, 6/1/31 | B2 | | 3,400,000 | | 3,335,638 |
Forsyth Cnty., Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds (GA | | | | | |
Baptist Hlth. Care Syst.), U.S. Govt. | | | | | |
Coll., 6 3/8s, 10/1/28 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 6,000,000 | | 7,424,760 |
Fulton Cnty., Res. Care Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Canterbury Court), Class A, | | | | | |
6 1/8s, 2/15/34 | B+/P | | 800,000 | | 787,208 |
(First Mtge. — Lenbrook), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5s, 7/1/17 | B/P | | 2,740,000 | | 2,648,100 |
Main St. Natural Gas, Inc. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(GA Gas) | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 9/15/26 | A1 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,034,500 |
Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 9/15/23 | A1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,039,860 |
Ser. B, 5s, 3/15/13 | A1 | | 2,520,000 | | 2,624,706 |
Med. Ctr. Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Spring | | | | | |
Harbor Green Island), 5 1/4s, 7/1/27 | B+/P | | 1,425,000 | | 1,280,747 |
Rockdale Cnty., Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Visy Paper), Ser. A, 6 1/8s, 1/1/34 | B+/P | | 1,400,000 | | 1,341,284 |
| | | | | 26,516,803 |
|
|
Idaho (0.1%) | | | | | |
ID Hsg. & Fin. Assn. Rev. Bonds (Single | | | | | |
Fam. Mtge.), Ser. C-2, FHA Insd., | | | | | |
5.15s, 7/1/29 | Aaa | | 1,105,000 | | 1,110,249 |
35
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Illinois (1.8%) | | | | | |
Bedford Pk., Village Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Hotel/Motel Tax), Ser. A, 4.9s, 12/1/23 | Baa1 | $ | 3,085,000 | $ | 3,092,743 |
Chicago, Special Assmt. Bonds (Lake Shore | | | | | |
East), 6 3/4s, 12/1/32 | BB/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,541,805 |
Du Page Cnty., Special Svc. Area No. 31 | | | | | |
Special Tax Bonds (Monarch Landing), | | | | | |
5 5/8s, 3/1/36 | BB–/P | | 900,000 | | 803,142 |
IL Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Monarch Landing, Inc.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
7s, 12/1/27 | B/P | | 2,350,000 | | 2,372,913 |
(Landing At Plymouth Place), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6s, 5/15/25 | B+/P | | 1,550,000 | | 1,518,845 |
(Sherman Hlth. Syst.), Ser. 07-A, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 8/1/37 | A– | | 4,000,000 | | 4,038,240 |
(Roosevelt U.), 5.4s, 4/1/27 | Baa1 | | 1,210,000 | | 1,207,048 |
IL Fin. Auth. Solid Waste Disposal (Waste | | | | | |
Mgmt., Inc.), Ser. A, 5.05s, 8/1/29 | BBB | | 500,000 | | 451,990 |
IL Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Cmnty. Rehab. Providers Fac.), 8 1/4s, | | | | | |
8/1/12 (Prerefunded) | CCC/P | | 179,403 | | 164,089 |
(Cmnty. Rehab. Providers Fac.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
7 7/8s, 7/1/20 | CCC/P | | 877,247 | | 783,873 |
(St. Benedict), Ser. 03A-1, 6.9s, 11/15/33 | B/P | | 1,000,000 | | 907,660 |
(Elmhurst Memorial Hlth. Care), | | | | | |
5 5/8s, 1/1/28 | A2 | | 6,000,000 | | 6,197,880 |
| | | | | 23,080,228 |
|
|
Indiana (1.4%) | | | | | |
Anderson, Econ. Dev. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Anderson U.), 5s, 10/1/28 | BBB–/F | | 1,500,000 | | 1,413,285 |
IN Bk. Special Program Gas Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5s, 10/15/17 | Aa2 | | 6,000,000 | | 6,368,820 |
Indianapolis, Arpt. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Federal Express Corp.), 5.1s, 1/15/17 | Baa2 | | 10,000,000 | | 10,303,800 |
| | | | | 18,085,905 |
|
|
Iowa (3.4%) | | | | | |
IA Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Single Fam. | | | | | |
Mtge.), Ser. D, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
5s, 1/1/36 | Aaa | | 3,250,000 | | 3,334,793 |
IA Fin. Auth. Hlth. Care Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Dev. Care Initiatives) | | | | | |
9 1/4s, 7/1/25 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 13,850,000 | | 16,925,670 |
Ser. A, 5 1/4s, 7/1/18 | BBB– | | 2,500,000 | | 2,520,150 |
Ser. A, 5 1/4s, 7/1/17 | BBB– | | 3,900,000 | | 3,955,380 |
Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 7/1/25 | BBB– | | 3,185,000 | | 3,135,792 |
IA Fin. Auth. Retirement Cmnty. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Friendship Haven) | | | | | |
Ser. A, 6s, 11/15/24 | BB/P | | 300,000 | | 300,918 |
36
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Iowa continued | | | | | |
IA State Higher Ed. Loan Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Wartburg), Ser. A | | | | | |
5s, 10/1/21 | BBB–/F | $ | 730,000 | $ | 717,904 |
5s, 10/1/20 | BBB–/F | | 1,270,000 | | 1,259,345 |
Marion Hlth. Care Fac. Rev. Bonds (First | | | | | |
Mtg.), Ser. IA, 1.76s, 1/1/29 | B+/P | | 45,000 | | 49,678 |
Tobacco Settlement Auth. of IA Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. B, 5.6s, 6/1/34 | BBB | | 9,000,000 | | 8,446,680 |
Ser. C, 5 3/8s, 6/1/38 | BBB | | 3,000,000 | | 2,708,430 |
| | | | | 43,354,740 |
|
|
Kansas (0.5%) | | | | | |
Lenexa, Hlth. Care Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(LakeView Village), Ser. C, 6 7/8s, | | | | | |
5/15/32 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 2,250,000 | | 2,649,038 |
Lenexa, Hlth. Care Fac. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 5/15/39 | BBB– | | 3,500,000 | | 3,198,860 |
| | | | | 5,847,898 |
|
|
Kentucky (0.1%) | | | | | |
KY Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (First | | | | | |
Mtg.), Ser. IA, 6 1/2s, 1/1/29 | B+/P | | 260,000 | | 287,451 |
KY Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth. Hlth. Syst. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Norton Hlth. Care), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 5/8s, 10/1/28 | A–/F | | 1,365,000 | | 1,414,836 |
| | | | | 1,702,287 |
|
|
Louisiana (2.0%) | | | | | |
LA Hlth. Ed. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Lambert House), Ser. A, 6.2s, 1/1/28 | B+/P | | 3,000,000 | | 3,005,640 |
LA Local Govt. Env. Fac. Cmnty. Dev. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (St. James Place), Ser. A, 7s, | | | | | |
11/1/20 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 8,828,000 | | 9,690,937 |
St. John Baptist Parish Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Marathon Oil Corp.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 6/1/37 | Baa1 | | 4,000,000 | | 3,890,320 |
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. 01-B, 5 7/8s, 5/15/39 | BBB | | 5,350,000 | | 5,233,370 |
W. Feliciana Parish, Poll. Control Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Entergy Gulf States), Ser. B, | | | | | |
6.6s, 9/1/28 | BBB– | | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,760 |
| | | | | 25,821,027 |
37
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Maine (0.4%) | | | | | |
Rumford, Solid Waste Disp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Boise Cascade Corp.), 6 7/8s, 10/1/26 | Ba3 | $ | 5,500,000 | $ | 5,665,440 |
|
|
Maryland (1.7%) | | | | | |
Howard Cnty., Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, U.S. | | | | | |
Govt. Coll., 8s, 5/15/29 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 5,000,000 | | 5,761,250 |
MD State Hlth. & Higher Edl. Fac. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Mercy Ridge), Ser. A, 6s, 4/1/35 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | BBB+ | | 2,000,000 | | 2,316,240 |
(Medstar Hlth.), 5 1/2s, 8/15/33 | A3 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,479,720 |
(Medstar Hlth.), 5 3/8s, 8/15/24 | A3 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,013,640 |
(Edenwald), Ser. A, 5.2s, 1/1/24 | BB/P | | 300,000 | | 284,133 |
(Edenwald), Ser. A, 5.2s, 1/1/20 | BB/P | | 350,000 | | 345,100 |
(Edenwald), Ser. A, 5 1/8s, 1/1/19 | BB/P | | 100,000 | | 98,641 |
(King Farm Presbyterian Cmnty.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
4 3/4s, 1/1/13 | B/P | | 3,435,000 | | 3,393,505 |
MD State Indl. Dev. Fin. Auth. Econ. Dev. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Our Lady of Good Counsel | | | | | |
School), Ser. A, 6s, 5/1/35 | B/P | | 600,000 | | 599,292 |
Westminster, Econ. Dev. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Carroll Lutheran Village), Ser. A | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 5/1/34 | BB/P | | 3,400,000 | | 3,410,030 |
6s, 5/1/24 | BB/P | | 2,000,000 | | 2,012,160 |
| | | | | 21,713,711 |
|
|
Massachusetts (5.0%) | | | | | |
MA State Dev. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Lasell College), 6 3/4s, 7/1/31 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | BB+/P | | 4,635,000 | | 5,352,683 |
(Lasell College), 6 3/4s, 7/1/31 | BB+/P | | 395,000 | | 401,506 |
(Linden Ponds, Inc.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 11/15/35 | BB/P | | 1,645,000 | | 1,516,756 |
(Linden Ponds, Inc.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 11/15/27 | BB/P | | 1,000,000 | | 922,880 |
(Wheelock College), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 10/1/37 | BBB | | 2,000,000 | | 1,952,840 |
(Wheelock College), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 10/1/29 | BBB | | 1,400,000 | | 1,371,524 |
(Linden Ponds, Inc.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 11/15/15 | BB/P | | 380,000 | | 385,050 |
MA State Dev. Fin. Agcy. Hlth. Care Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Adventcare), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6.65s, 10/15/28 | B/P | | 2,150,000 | | 2,070,364 |
38
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Massachusetts continued | | | | | |
MA State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Civic Investments/HPHC), Ser. A, 9s, | | | | | |
12/15/15 (Prerefunded) | BBB–/P | $ | 7,515,000 | $ | 9,277,643 |
(Jordan Hosp.), Ser. E, 6 3/4s, 10/1/33 | BB+ | | 6,000,000 | | 6,265,020 |
(Winchester Hosp.), Ser. E, 6 3/4s, 7/1/30 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | BBB+/F | | 4,815,000 | | 5,306,178 |
(UMass Memorial), Ser. C, 6 5/8s, 7/1/32 | Baa2 | | 9,750,000 | | 10,037,040 |
(Berkshire Hlth. Syst.), Ser. E, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 10/1/31 | BBB+ | | 4,400,000 | | 4,502,388 |
(Hlth. Care Syst.-Covenant Hlth.), | | | | | |
6s, 7/1/31 | AAA | | 5,685,000 | | 5,976,413 |
(Hlth. Care Syst.-Covenant Hlth.), | | | | | |
6s, 7/1/31 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 1,515,000 | | 1,716,965 |
(Fisher College), Ser. A, 5 1/8s, 4/1/37 | BBB– | | 1,400,000 | | 1,273,188 |
(Milford Regl. Med.), Ser. E, 5s, 7/15/32 | Baa3 | | 1,000,000 | | 898,530 |
(Milford Regl. Med.), Ser. E, 5s, 7/15/27 | Baa3 | | 2,750,000 | | 2,543,668 |
MA State Indl. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds (1st | | | | | |
Mtge. Stone Institution & Newton), | | | | | |
7.9s, 1/1/24 | BB–/P | | 750,000 | | 753,195 |
| | | | | 62,523,831 |
|
|
Michigan (2.4%) | | | | | |
Ann Arbor, Econ. Dev. Corp. Ltd. Oblig. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Glacier Hills, Inc.), State & | | | | | |
Local Govt. Coll., 8 3/8s, 1/15/19 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 2,198,000 | | 2,801,659 |
Detroit, Swr. Disp. VRDN, Ser. B, FSA, | | | | | |
2s, 7/1/33 | VMIG1 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,200,000 |
Dickinson Cnty., Econ. Dev. Corp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, 5 3/4s, 6/1/16 | BBB | | 7,000,000 | | 7,259,000 |
Flint, Hosp. Bldg. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Hurley Med. Ctr.), 6s, 7/1/20 | Ba1 | | 2,350,000 | | 2,369,223 |
Garden City, Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Garden City Hosp.) Ser. A | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 9/1/17 | Ba1 | | 1,595,000 | | 1,600,200 |
5 5/8s, 9/1/10 | Ba1 | | 535,000 | | 542,736 |
5 5/8s, 9/1/10 (Prerefunded) | Ba1 | | 470,000 | | 484,255 |
Kentwood, Economic Dev. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Holland Home), Ser. A, 5s, 11/15/22 | BB–/P | | 500,000 | | 476,350 |
MI State Hosp. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Oakwood Hosp.), Ser. A, 5 3/4s, 4/1/32 | A2 | | 2,500,000 | | 2,577,225 |
MI State Hsg. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, 3.9s, 6/1/30 | AA+ | | 3,680,000 | | 3,680,368 |
MI State Strategic Fund Solid Waste Disp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (SD Warren Co.), Ser. C, | | | | | |
7 3/8s, 1/15/22 | BB/P | | 5,000,000 | | 5,019,600 |
MI State Strategic Fund, Ltd. VRDN | | | | | |
(Detroit Symphony), Ser. B, 1.9s, 6/1/31 | A–1+ | | 1,405,000 | | 1,405,000 |
MI State U. VRDN, Ser. A, 2s, 8/15/32 | VMIG1 | | 500,000 | | 500,000 |
MI Tobacco Settlement Fin. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A, 6s, 6/1/34 | BBB | | 425,000 | | 420,521 |
| | | | | 30,336,137 |
39
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Minnesota (1.3%) | | | | | |
Inver Grove Heights, Nursing Home Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Presbyterian Homes Care) | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 10/1/41 | B/P | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 918,560 |
5 3/8s, 10/1/26 | B/P | | 250,000 | | 237,965 |
MN State Higher Ed. Fac. Auth. VRDN (St. | | | | | |
Olaf College), Ser. 5-M2, 2s, 10/1/20 | VMIG1 | | 1,300,000 | | 1,300,000 |
MN State Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Res. Hsg.) | | | | | |
Ser. H, 5s, 1/1/36 | Aa1 | | 1,630,000 | | 1,670,554 |
Ser. B, 5s, 7/1/34 | Aa1 | | 775,000 | | 790,849 |
North Oaks, Sr. Hsg. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Presbyterian Homes) | | | | | |
6 1/8s, 10/1/39 | BB/P | | 1,375,000 | | 1,356,878 |
6s, 10/1/27 | BB/P | | 1,250,000 | | 1,237,088 |
Sauk Rapids Hlth. Care & Hsg. Fac. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Good Shepherd Lutheran Home), | | | | | |
6s, 1/1/34 | B+/P | | 800,000 | | 773,448 |
St. Paul, Hsg. & Redev. Auth. Hlth. Care | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (HealthPartners Oblig. | | | | | |
Group), 5 1/4s, 5/15/36 | Baa1 | | 2,035,000 | | 1,986,221 |
St. Paul, Hsg. & Redev. Auth. Hosp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Healtheast), 6s, 11/15/35 | Baa3 | | 1,250,000 | | 1,255,250 |
St. Paul, Port Auth. Lease Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Regions Hosp. Pkg. Ramp), Ser. 1 | | | | | |
5s, 8/1/36 | BBB–/P | | 275,000 | | 233,382 |
5s, 8/1/21 | BBB–/P | | 950,000 | | 895,670 |
Washington Cnty., Hsg. & Redev. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Healtheast), 5 1/2s, 11/15/27 | Baa3 | | 4,250,000 | | 4,105,543 |
| | | | | 16,761,408 |
|
|
Mississippi (1.0%) | | | | | |
Jackson Cnty., Poll. Control VRDN (Chevron | | | | | |
USA, Inc.), 2s, 6/1/23 | P–1 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,200,000 |
Lowndes Cnty., Solid Waste Disp. & Poll. | | | | | |
Control Rev. Bonds (Weyerhaeuser Co.) | | | | | |
Ser. A, 6.8s, 4/1/22 | Baa2 | | 715,000 | | 807,793 |
Ser. B, 6.7s, 4/1/22 | Baa2 | | 2,500,000 | | 2,800,050 |
MS Bus. Fin. Corp. Poll. Control Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Syst. Energy Resources, Inc.), | | | | | |
5 7/8s, 4/1/22 | BBB | | 2,000,000 | | 2,015,240 |
MS Home Corp. Rev. Bonds (Single | | | | | |
Fam. Mtge.) | | | | | |
Ser. B-2, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
6.45s, 12/1/33 | Aaa | | 3,690,000 | | 3,936,750 |
Ser. B, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 6/1/36 | Aaa | | 1,205,000 | | 1,252,670 |
MS Hosp. Equip. & Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Hosp. South Central), 5 1/4s, 12/1/21 | BBB+ | | 500,000 | | 503,120 |
| | | | | 12,515,623 |
40
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Missouri (1.2%) | | | | | |
Cape Girardeau Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. | | | | | |
Hlth. Care Fac. Rev. Bonds (St. Francis | | | | | |
Med. Ctr.), Ser. A | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 6/1/32 | A+ | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 3,070,500 |
5 1/2s, 6/1/27 | A+ | | 3,250,000 | | 3,358,583 |
Kansas City, Indl. Dev. Auth. Hlth. Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (First Mtg. Bishop Spencer), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 6 1/4s, 1/1/24 | BB–/P | | 2,000,000 | | 2,024,420 |
MO State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. VRDN (SSM | | | | | |
Hlth. Care), Ser. C-1, FSA, 2s, 6/1/19 | A–1+ | | 1,505,000 | | 1,505,000 |
MO State Hsg. Dev. Comm. Mtge. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Single Fam. Home Ownership Loan), | | | | | |
Ser. A-1, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
6 3/4s, 3/1/34 | AAA | | 900,000 | | 931,275 |
(Single Fam. Mtge.), Ser. D-2, GNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FNMA Coll., 6 1/2s, 9/1/29 | AAA | | 1,265,000 | | 1,320,964 |
(Single Fam.), Ser. E-1, GNMA Coll., FNMA | | | | | |
Coll., 6.45s, 9/1/29 | AAA | | 365,000 | | 383,119 |
(Single Fam. Homeowner Loan), Ser. A-2, | | | | | |
GNMA Coll., 6.3s, 3/1/30 | AAA | | 2,220,000 | | 2,232,321 |
(Single Fam. Home Ownership Loan), Ser. C, | | | | | |
GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., 5.6s, 9/1/35 | AAA | | 850,000 | | 888,199 |
| | | | | 15,714,381 |
|
|
Montana (0.1%) | | | | | |
MT Fac. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Sr. Living | | | | | |
St. Johns Lutheran), Ser. A, 6s, 5/15/25 | B+/P | | 750,000 | | 745,140 |
MT State Board Inv. Exempt Fac. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Still Water Mining Project), 8s, 7/1/20 | B– | | 750,000 | | 770,618 |
| | | | | 1,515,758 |
|
|
Nebraska (—%) | | | | | |
Kearney, Indl. Dev. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Great Platte River), 8s, 9/1/12 | CCC/P | | 123,433 | | 27,155 |
(Brookhaven), zero %, 9/1/12 | CCC/P | | 1,582,934 | | 31,659 |
| | | | | 58,814 |
|
|
Nevada (2.1%) | | | | | |
Clark Cnty., Impt. Dist. Special Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
(Summerlin No. 142), 6 3/8s, 8/1/23 | BB–/P | | 985,000 | | 990,427 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/20 | BB/P | | 340,000 | | 307,635 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/19 | BB/P | | 1,150,000 | | 1,057,299 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/18 | BB–/P | | 1,115,000 | | 1,037,329 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/17 | BB/P | | 1,320,000 | | 1,238,252 |
(Summerlin No. 151), 5s, 8/1/25 | BB/P | | 305,000 | | 263,331 |
Clark Cnty., Indl. Dev. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(NV Pwr. Co.), Ser. C, 5 1/2s, 10/1/30 | B | | 2,500,000 | | 2,348,975 |
(Southwest Gas Corp. Project), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5.45s, 3/1/38 | Baa3 | | 5,350,000 | | 5,607,656 |
41
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Nevada continued | | | | | |
Clark Cnty., Local Impt. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds (No. 142), 6.1s, 8/1/18 | BB–/P | $ | 1,475,000 | $ | 1,493,482 |
Henderson, Local Impt. Dist. Special | | | | | |
Assmt. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. T-16), 5 1/8s, 3/1/25 | BB/P | | 490,000 | | 387,311 |
(No. T-16), 5.1s, 3/1/21 | BB/P | | 1,215,000 | | 1,009,252 |
(No. T-17), 5s, 9/1/25 | BB–/P | | 815,000 | | 678,276 |
(No. T-16), 5s, 3/1/20 | BB/P | | 975,000 | | 789,623 |
(No. T-18), 5s, 9/1/16 | BB–/P | | 375,000 | | 347,288 |
(No. T-18), 5s, 9/1/15 | BB–/P | | 2,295,000 | | 2,155,533 |
(No. T-18), 5s, 9/1/14 | BB–/P | | 2,330,000 | | 2,210,937 |
(No. T-16), 4.8s, 3/1/15 | BB/P | | 1,750,000 | | 1,566,863 |
Las Vegas, Local Impt. Board Special Assmt. | | | | | |
(Special Impt. Dist. No. 607), 6s, 6/1/19 | BB–/P | | 980,000 | | 941,045 |
(Dist. No. 607), 5.9s, 6/1/18 | BB–/P | | 195,000 | | 187,695 |
(Dist. No. 607), 5.9s, 6/1/17 | BB–/P | | 1,465,000 | | 1,415,996 |
Las Vegas, Special Impt. Dist. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(No. 809 — Summerlin Area), 5.65s, 6/1/23 | BB/P | | 795,000 | | 760,394 |
| | | | | 26,794,599 |
|
|
New Hampshire (2.3%) | | | | | |
NH Higher Edl. & Hlth. Fac. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Rivermead at Peterborough), | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 7/1/28 | BB/P | | 6,000,000 | | 5,742,900 |
NH Hlth. & Ed. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Huntington at Nashua), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 7/8s, 5/1/33 | BB–/P | | 2,400,000 | | 2,503,848 |
NH Hlth. & Ed. Fac. Auth. Hosp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Catholic Med. Ctr.) | | | | | |
5s, 7/1/36 | Baa1 | | 1,650,000 | | 1,543,262 |
5s, 7/1/32 | Baa1 | | 3,000,000 | | 2,830,410 |
NH State Bus. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Alice Peck Day Hlth. Syst.), Ser. A, 7s, | | | | | |
10/1/29 (Prerefunded) | BBB–/P | | 3,000,000 | | 3,290,070 |
(Proctor Academy), Ser. A, 5.6s, 6/1/28 | Baa3 | | 3,550,000 | | 3,562,709 |
NH State Bus. Fin. Auth. Poll. Control Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Pub. Svc. Co.), Ser. D, 6s, 5/1/21 | Baa1 | | 7,000,000 | | 7,170,450 |
NH State Bus. Fin. Auth. Poll. Control & | | | | | |
Solid Waste Rev. Bonds (Crown Paper Co.), | | | | | |
7 3/4s, 1/1/22 (In default) † | D | | 8,275,222 | | 828 |
NH State Hsg. Fin. Auth. Single Family | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Mtge. Acquisition), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5.85s, 1/1/35 | Aa2 | | 2,355,000 | | 2,436,012 |
| | | | | 29,080,489 |
42
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
New Jersey (5.2%) | | | | | |
Burlington Cnty., Bridge Comm. Econ. Dev. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (The Evergreens), 5 5/8s, 1/1/38 | BB+/P | $ | 5,500,000 | $ | 5,135,240 |
NJ Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Newark Arpt. Marriot Hotel), 7s, 10/1/14 | Ba1 | | 9,200,000 | | 9,226,680 |
(First Mtge. Presbyterian Home), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 3/8s, 11/1/31 | BB/P | | 500,000 | | 504,095 |
(United Methodist Homes), Ser. A-1, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 7/1/33 | BB+ | | 3,000,000 | | 3,046,770 |
(First Mtge. Presbyterian Home), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 11/1/20 | BB/P | | 500,000 | | 513,100 |
(First Mtge. Lions Gate), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 7/8s, 1/1/37 | B/P | | 800,000 | | 751,936 |
(Cigarette Tax), 5 1/2s, 6/15/24 | Baa2 | | 12,000,000 | | 11,581,440 |
NJ Econ. Dev. Auth. Retirement Cmnty. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Seabrook Village, Inc.), 5 1/4s, 11/15/36 | BB–/P | | 3,590,000 | | 3,119,387 |
NJ Hlth. Care Fac. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Gen. Hosp. Ctr.-Passaic Inc.), FSA, U.S. | | | | | |
Govt. Coll., 6 3/4s, 7/1/19 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 6,000,000 | | 7,508,520 |
(South Jersey Hosp.), 6s, 7/1/12 | A3 | | 5,000,000 | | 5,284,050 |
(St. Peters U. Hosp.), 5 3/4s, 7/1/37 | Baa2 | | 4,500,000 | | 4,527,720 |
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
6 3/4s, 6/1/39 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 2,000,000 | | 2,386,920 |
6 1/4s, 6/1/43 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,535,000 | | 1,794,262 |
6s, 6/1/37 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 6,260,000 | | 7,102,596 |
Ser. 1A, 5s, 6/1/29 | BBB | | 3,100,000 | | 2,763,743 |
| | | | | 65,246,459 |
|
|
New Mexico (0.9%) | | | | | |
Farmington, Poll. Control Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Tucson Elec. Pwr. Co. San Juan), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6.95s, 10/1/20 | Baa3 | | 5,500,000 | | 5,624,135 |
(San Juan), Ser. B, 4 7/8s, 4/1/33 | Baa2 | | 1,450,000 | | 1,297,431 |
NM Mtge. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Single | | | | | |
Fam. Mtge.) | | | | | |
Ser. B-2, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FHLMC Coll., 6.1s, 7/1/29 | AAA | | 515,000 | | 525,099 |
Ser. C, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FHLMC Coll., 5.85s, 1/1/37 | AAA | | 1,090,000 | | 1,160,370 |
Ser. C, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FHLMC Coll., 5.82s, 9/1/33 | AAA | | 1,405,000 | | 1,457,027 |
Ser. D-2, GNMA Coll., FNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FHLMC Coll., 5.64s, 9/1/33 | AAA | | 1,730,000 | | 1,761,261 |
| | | | | 11,825,323 |
|
|
New York (6.0%) | | | | | |
Albany, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Charitable Leadership), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 7/1/26 | Ba2 | | 2,000,000 | | 1,990,900 |
Huntington, Hsg. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Gurwin | | | | | |
Jewish Sr. Residence), Ser. A, 6s, 5/1/39 | B+/P | | 1,250,000 | | 1,181,038 |
43
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | Principal amount | | Value |
|
New York continued | | | | | |
Niagara Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Mandatory | | | | | |
Put Bonds | | | | | |
(Solid Waste Disp.), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5 5/8s, 11/15/14 | Baa2 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 457,884 |
(Solid Waste Disp.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5.45s, 11/15/12 | Baa2 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,525,695 |
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Liberty-7 World Trade Ctr.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
6 3/4s, 3/1/15 | B–/P | | 2,300,000 | | 2,408,077 |
(Liberty-7 World Trade Ctr.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 3/1/15 | B–/P | | 4,375,000 | | 4,546,325 |
(Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogen. Partners), | | | | | |
5.65s, 10/1/28 | BBB– | | 3,250,000 | | 3,206,873 |
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Staten Island U. Hosp.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 3/8s, 7/1/31 | B2 | | 625,000 | | 632,706 |
(Brooklyn Polytech. U. Project J), 6 1/8s, | | | | | |
11/1/30 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 500,000 | | 554,735 |
NY City, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Special Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(American Airlines — JFK Intl. Arpt.), | | | | | |
8s, 8/1/28 | B | | 1,500,000 | | 1,652,700 |
(American Airlines — JFK Intl. Arpt.), | | | | | |
7 1/2s, 8/1/16 | B | | 17,690,000 | | 18,731,057 |
(American Airlines — JFK Intl. Arpt.), | | | | | |
7 1/8s, 8/1/11 | B | | 4,500,000 | | 4,569,885 |
(British Airways PLC), 5 1/4s, 12/1/32 | Ba1 | | 2,325,000 | | 1,951,535 |
(Jetblue Airways Corp.), 5s, 5/15/20 | B | | 675,000 | | 575,370 |
NY City, State Dorm. Auth. Lease Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Court Fac.), 6s, 5/15/39 (Prerefunded) | AA– | | 2,800,000 | | 3,059,672 |
NY State Dorm. Auth. Rev. Bonds (NY U. | | | | | |
Hosp. Ctr.), Ser. A, 5s, 7/1/20 | Ba2 | | 1,500,000 | | 1,512,225 |
NY State Dorm. Auth. Non-State Supported | | | | | |
Debt Rev. Bonds (NYU Hosp. Ctr.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 7/1/24 | Ba2 | | 2,155,000 | | 2,155,216 |
NY State Energy Research & Dev. Auth. Gas | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Brooklyn Union Gas), | | | | | |
6.952s, 7/1/26 | A+ | | 1,800,000 | | 1,832,058 |
Oneida Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(St. Elizabeth Med.), Ser. A, 5 7/8s, 12/1/29 | BB+/P | | 1,500,000 | | 1,488,015 |
Onondaga Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Solvay Paperboard, LLC), 7s, | | | | | |
11/1/30 (acquired 12/9/98, cost $8,900,000) ‡ | BB/P | | 8,900,000 | | 9,039,908 |
Port Auth. NY & NJ Rev. Bonds (Kennedy | | | | | |
Intl. Arpt. — 4th Installment), 6 3/4s, 10/1/11 | BB+/P | | 2,500,000 | | 2,531,525 |
Suffolk Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Peconic Landings), Ser. A, 8s, 10/1/20 | BB–/P | | 4,000,000 | | 4,281,960 |
44
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
New York continued | | | | | |
Suffolk Cnty., Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Southampton Hosp. Assn.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
7 5/8s, 1/1/30 | B-/P | $ | 3,665,000 | $ | 3,821,789 |
(Gurwin Jewish-Phase II), 6.7s, 5/1/39 | B+/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,026,570 |
Yonkers, Indl. Dev. Agcy. Civic Fac. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (St. John’s Riverside Hosp.), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 7 1/8s, 7/1/31 | B- | | 500,000 | | 506,430 |
| | | | | 75,240,148 |
|
|
North Carolina (1.9%) | | | | | |
NC Eastern Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Syst. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. C | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 1/1/17 | Baa1 | | 7,500,000 | | 7,951,500 |
5 3/8s, 1/1/16 | Baa1 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,064,780 |
5.3s, 1/1/15 | Baa1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,132,120 |
NC Hsg. Fin. Agcy. FRN (Homeownership), | | | | | |
Ser. 26, Class A, 5 1/2s, 1/1/38 | Aa2 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,052,980 |
NC Med. Care Cmnty. Hlth. Care Fac. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (First Mtge. — Presbyterian Homes), | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 10/1/22 | BB/P | | 4,250,000 | | 4,259,860 |
NC Med. Care Comm. Retirement Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(First Mtge. Givens Estates), Ser. A, | | | | | |
6 1/2s, 7/1/32 (Prerefunded) | BB–/P | | 4,500,000 | | 5,316,210 |
(First Mtge. United Methodist), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 10/1/32 | BB+/P | | 2,000,000 | | 1,867,100 |
(First Mtge. United Methodist), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 10/1/24 | BB+/P | | 200,000 | | 190,180 |
| | | | | 23,834,730 |
|
|
North Dakota (0.1%) | | | | | |
ND State Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds (Home | | | | | |
Mtge.), Ser. D, 5.95s, 7/1/19 | Aa1 | | 895,000 | | 923,577 |
|
|
Ohio (2.9%) | | | | | |
Buckeye, Tobacco Settlement Fin. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A-2, 5 3/4s, 6/1/34 | BBB | | 20,300,000 | | 19,552,757 |
Ser. A-2, 5 1/8s, 6/1/24 | BBB | | 950,000 | | 916,826 |
Ser. A-3, zero %, stepped coupon (6.25s, | | | | | |
12/1/12) 6/1/37 †† | BBB | | 13,800,000 | | 10,280,448 |
Coshocton Cnty., Env. 144A Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.), | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 8/1/13 | CCC+ | | 1,600,000 | | 1,552,016 |
OH State Env. Impt. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(USX Corp.), 5 5/8s, 5/1/29 | Baa1 | | 750,000 | | 771,923 |
45
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Ohio continued | | | | | |
OH State Wtr. Dev. Auth. Solid Waste Disp. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Bay Shore Power Co.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 7/8s, 9/1/20 | BB+/P | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 1,107,887 |
(Allied Waste N.A. Inc.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5.15s, 7/15/15 | B+ | | 2,600,000 | | 2,482,272 |
| | | | | 36,664,129 |
|
|
Oklahoma (0.9%) | | | | | |
OK Dev. Fin. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Hillcrest | | | | | |
Hlth. Care Syst.), Ser. A, U.S. Govt. | | | | | |
Coll., 5 5/8s, 8/15/29 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,075,000 | | 3,261,622 |
OK Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Single Fam. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Homeowner Loan), Ser. D-2, GNMA Coll., | | | | | |
FNMA Coll., 7.1s, 9/1/26 | Aaa | | 555,000 | | 559,124 |
(Homeownership Loan), Ser. C-2, GNMA | | | | | |
Coll., FNMA Coll., 5.7s, 9/1/35 | Aaa | | 1,550,000 | | 1,638,614 |
(Homeownership Loan), Ser. B, 5.35s, 3/1/35 | Aaa | | 1,890,000 | | 1,959,382 |
Tulsa, Muni. Arpt. Trust Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. B, 5.65s, 12/1/35 | B | | 4,250,000 | | 4,232,023 |
| | | | | 11,650,765 |
|
|
Oregon (1.0%) | | | | | |
Multnomah Cnty., Hosp. Fac. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Terwilliger Plaza), 6 1/2s, 12/1/29 | BB–/P | | 8,700,000 | | 8,780,736 |
OR State G.O. Bonds (Veterans Welfare), | | | | | |
Ser. 81, 5 1/4s, 10/1/42 | Aa2 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,017,040 |
OR State Hsg. & Cmnty. Svcs. Dept. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Single Fam. Mtge.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 7/1/34 | Aa2 | | 1,647,000 | | 1,701,302 |
| | | | | 12,499,078 |
|
|
Pennsylvania (5.2%) | | | | | |
Allegheny Cnty., Hosp. Dev. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Hlth. Syst.), Ser. B, 9 1/4s, 11/15/15 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | AAA | | 5,985,000 | | 7,027,647 |
(Hlth. Syst.-West PA), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 3/8s, 11/15/40 | Ba2 | | 8,430,000 | | 7,374,395 |
Allegheny Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Env. Impt.), 5 1/2s, 11/1/16 | Baa3 | | 4,055,000 | | 4,196,803 |
(Env. Impt. USX Corp.), 4 3/4s, 12/1/32 | BBB+ | | 1,000,000 | | 1,050,810 |
Bucks Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Retirement | | | | | |
Cmnty. Rev. Bonds (Ann’s Choice, Inc.), | | | | | |
Ser. A | | | | | |
6 1/8s, 1/1/25 | BB/P | | 3,840,000 | | 3,825,715 |
5.1s, 1/1/12 | BB/P | | 600,000 | | 601,446 |
46
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Pennsylvania continued | | | | | |
Carbon Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Panther Creek Partners), 6.65s, 5/1/10 | BBB– | $ | 6,255,000 | $ | 6,403,494 |
Chester Cnty., Hlth. & Ed. Fac. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Jenners Pond, Inc.) | | | | | |
7 5/8s, 7/1/34 (Prerefunded) | BB–/P | | 1,700,000 | | 2,057,476 |
7 1/4s, 7/1/24 (Prerefunded) | BB–/P | | 1,725,000 | | 2,061,185 |
Chester Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. VRDN | | | | | |
(Archdiocese Philadelphia), 2.05s, 7/1/31 | VMIG1 | | 500,000 | | 500,000 |
Lancaster Cnty., Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Brethren Village), Ser. A, 6 1/2s, 7/1/40 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 993,230 |
(Brethren Village), Ser. A, 6 3/8s, 7/1/30 | BB–/P | | 375,000 | | 375,893 |
(Gen. Hosp.), 5 1/2s, 3/15/26 (Prerefunded) | AA– | | 1,500,000 | | 1,703,895 |
Lebanon Cnty., Hlth. Facs. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Pleasant View Retirement), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 12/15/20 | BB–/P | | 1,000,000 | | 953,270 |
Monroe Cnty., Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Pocono Med. Ctr.), 5 1/4s, 1/1/43 | BBB+ | | 3,000,000 | | 2,838,300 |
Montgomery Cnty., Indl. Auth. Resource | | | | | |
Recvy. Rev. Bonds (Whitemarsh Cont Care), | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 2/1/35 | B–/P | | 2,400,000 | | 2,363,088 |
New Morgan, Indl. Dev. Auth. Solid Waste | | | | | |
Disp. Rev. Bonds (New Morgan | | | | | |
Landfill Co., Inc.), 6 1/2s, 4/1/19 | BB– | | 1,750,000 | | 1,751,400 |
PA Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth. Exempt Fac. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Reliant Energy), Ser. B, 6 3/4s, 12/1/36 | B2 | | 3,600,000 | | 3,701,844 |
PA State Econ. Dev. Fin. Auth. Resource | | | | | |
Recvy. Rev. Bonds (Northampton Generating), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 6 1/2s, 1/1/13 | B+ | | 3,000,000 | | 3,010,740 |
PA State Higher Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Widener U.), 5.4s, 7/15/36 | BBB+ | | 1,500,000 | | 1,510,485 |
PA State Pub. School Bldg. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Wattsburg Area School), MBIA, | | | | | |
zero %, 5/15/27 | Aaa | | 2,150,000 | | 829,793 |
Philadelphia, Hosp. & Higher Ed. Fac. | | | | | |
(Graduate Hlth. Syst. Oblig. Group) | | | | | |
Auth. Rev. Bonds, 7 1/4s, 7/1/18 | | | | | |
(In default) † | D/P | | 5,530,591 | | 553 |
(Graduate Hlth. Syst.), Ser. B, 6 1/4s, | | | | | |
7/1/13 (In default) † | D/P | | 543,013 | | 54 |
Scranton, G.O. Bonds, Ser. C | | | | | |
7.1s, 9/1/31 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 3,060,000 | | 3,527,905 |
7s, 9/1/22 (Prerefunded) | AAA/P | | 1,000,000 | | 1,149,520 |
WA Cnty., G.O. Bonds, Ser. A, MBIA, | | | | | |
zero %, 9/1/31 | Aaa | | 1,500,000 | | 453,465 |
Washington Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Hlth. | | | | | |
Care Fac. Rev. Bonds (First Mtge. | | | | | |
AHF/Central), 7 3/4s, 1/1/29 | B–/P | | 1,245,000 | | 1,390,827 |
47
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Pennsylvania continued | | | | | |
West Shore, Area Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Holy Spirit Hosp.), 6 1/4s, 1/1/32 | BBB | $ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,040,700 |
York Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(PSEG Power, LLC), Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 9/1/20 | Baa1 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,078,920 |
| | | | | 65,772,853 |
|
|
Puerto Rico (1.6%) | | | | | |
Cmnwlth. of PR, G.O. Bonds, Ser. A | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 7/1/18 | Baa3 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,098,900 |
5s, 7/1/25 | Baa3 | | 7,000,000 | | 7,010,080 |
PR Indl. Tourist Edl. Med. & Env. Control | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Cogen. Fac.-AES), | | | | | |
6 5/8s, 6/1/26 | Baa3 | | 7,400,000 | | 7,799,156 |
PR Sales Tax Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, FGIC, zero %, 8/1/41 | Aaa | | 30,000,000 | | 4,891,200 |
| | | | | 20,799,336 |
|
|
Rhode Island (0.2%) | | | | | |
Tobacco Settlement Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 6/1/42 | BBB | | 1,310,000 | | 1,315,751 |
6 1/8s, 6/1/32 | BBB | | 1,465,000 | | 1,474,493 |
| | | | | 2,790,244 |
|
|
South Carolina (3.6%) | | | | | |
Piedmont, Muni. Elec. Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, FGIC, 6 1/2s, 1/1/16 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,080,000 | | 3,799,396 |
Ser. A, FGIC, 6 1/2s, 1/1/16 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 630,000 | | 761,450 |
(Unrefunded Balance 2004), Ser. A, FGIC, | | | | | |
6 1/2s, 1/1/16 | Aaa | | 2,410,000 | | 2,905,448 |
SC Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Med. U.), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 6 1/2s, 8/15/32 (Prerefunded) | AAA | | 5,750,000 | | 6,680,638 |
SC Hsg. Fin. & Dev. Auth. Mtge. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds, Ser. A-2, AMBAC, 5s, 7/1/35 | Aaa | | 2,405,000 | | 2,460,652 |
SC Jobs Econ. Dev. Auth. Hosp. Fac. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. A, 7 3/8s, | | | | | |
12/15/21 (Prerefunded) | BBB+/P | | 3,800,000 | | 4,381,362 |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. C, 6 3/8s, 8/1/34 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 2,670,000 | | 3,136,182 |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. C, 6 3/8s, 8/1/34 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 330,000 | | 387,618 |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. C, 6s, 8/1/20 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 4,450,000 | | 5,142,910 |
(Palmetto Hlth.), Ser. C, 6s, 8/1/20 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | Baa1 | | 550,000 | | 635,641 |
48
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
South Carolina continued | | | | | |
SC Tobacco Settlement Rev. Mgmt. Auth. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, Ser. B | | | | | |
6 3/8s, 5/15/30 | BBB | $ | 9,000,000 | $ | 9,154,980 |
6 3/8s, 5/15/28 | BBB | | 6,000,000 | | 6,092,100 |
| | | | | 45,538,377 |
|
|
South Dakota (0.4%) | | | | | |
SD Edl. Enhancement Funding Corp. SD | | | | | |
Tobacco Rev. Bonds, Ser. B, 6 1/2s, 6/1/32 | BBB | | 3,615,000 | | 3,682,745 |
SD State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Sioux Valley Hosp. & Hlth. Syst.), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5 1/2s, 11/1/31 | AA– | | 1,230,000 | | 1,262,595 |
| | | | | 4,945,340 |
|
|
Tennessee (2.7%) | | | | | |
Elizabethton, Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Board Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Hosp. Ref. & Impt.), Ser. B, | | | | | |
8s, 7/1/33 | Baa1 | | 4,000,000 | | 4,966,280 |
Johnson City, Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Board | | | | | |
Hosp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(First Mtge. Mountain States Hlth.), | | | | | |
Ser. A, 7 1/2s, 7/1/33 | Baa1 | | 6,500,000 | | 7,951,580 |
(Mountain States Hlth.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
7 1/2s, 7/1/25 | Baa1 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,669,960 |
(Mountain States Hlth.), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 7/1/36 | Baa1 | | 7,000,000 | | 6,871,340 |
Memphis-Shelby Cnty., Arpt. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Federal Express Corp.), | | | | | |
5.05s, 9/1/12 | Baa2 | | 500,000 | | 524,065 |
TN Energy Acquisition Corp. Gas Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. A, 5 1/4s, 9/1/22 | Aa3 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,022,490 |
Ser. C, 5s, 2/1/20 | Aa3 | | 9,000,000 | | 9,154,350 |
| | | | | 34,160,065 |
|
|
Texas (5.3%) | | | | | |
Abilene, Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Sears Methodist Retirement), Ser. A | | | | | |
7s, 11/15/33 | BB–/P | | 2,500,000 | | 2,596,400 |
5.9s, 11/15/25 | BB–/P | | 6,850,000 | | 6,730,947 |
Bexar Cnty., Hsg. Fin. Auth. Corp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (American Opty-Waterford), Ser. A1, | | | | | |
7s, 12/1/36 | Baa2 | | 4,500,000 | | 4,708,890 |
Brazos River, Auth. Poll. Control Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (TXU Energy Co., LLC), 5s, 3/1/41 | Caa1 | | 1,000,000 | | 745,610 |
Cedar Hill, Indpt. School Dist. G.O. Bonds | | | | | |
(School Impt.), FGIC, zero %, 8/15/31 | Aaa | | 6,045,000 | | 1,810,719 |
Crawford Ed. Fac. Rev. Bonds (U. St. | | | | | |
Thomas), 5 3/8s, 10/1/27 | BBB+ | | 3,985,000 | | 4,014,848 |
Fort Worth, Higher Ed. Fin. Corp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Wesleyan U.), Ser. A, 6s, 10/1/12 | Ba2 | | 1,720,000 | | 1,722,460 |
49
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Texas continued | | | | | |
Houston, Arpt. Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Special Fac. — Continental | | | | | |
Airlines, Inc.), Ser. E, 6 3/4s, 7/1/21 | B3 | $ | 7,400,000 | $ | 7,483,398 |
(Continental Airlines, Inc.), Ser. C, | | | | | |
5.7s, 7/15/29 | B3 | | 3,000,000 | | 2,664,180 |
Houston, Wtr. & Swr. Syst. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, FSA, zero %, 12/1/27 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 1,520,000 | | 600,552 |
Lufkin, Hlth. Fac. Dev. Corp. Hlth. Syst. | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds (Memorial Hlth. Syst. of East TX) | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 2/15/32 | BBB+ | | 1,500,000 | | 1,468,665 |
5 1/4s, 2/15/27 | BBB+ | | 625,000 | | 606,700 |
Mission, Econ. Dev. Corp. Solid Waste | | | | | |
Disp. Rev. Bonds (Allied Waste | | | | | |
N.A. Inc.), Ser. A, 5.2s, 4/1/18 | B+ | | 3,000,000 | | 2,765,520 |
Richardson, Indpt. School Dist. G.O. | | | | | |
Bonds, PSFG, zero %, 2/15/20 | Aaa | | 3,700,000 | | 2,252,264 |
Round Rock, Hotel Occupancy Tax Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Convention Ctr. Complex), 5.85s, 12/1/24 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | BBB/P | | 5,265,000 | | 5,605,224 |
Sam Rayburn Muni. Pwr. Agcy. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
6s, 10/1/21 | Baa2 | | 8,000,000 | | 8,395,680 |
San Antonio, Arpt. Syst. Rev. Bonds, FSA, | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 7/1/32 | Aaa | | 1,415,000 | | 1,451,903 |
Tarrant Cnty., Cultural Ed. Fac. | | | | | |
Fin. Corp. Rev. Bonds (Northwest Sr. Hsg. | | | | | |
Edgemere), Ser. A, 5 3/4s, 11/15/16 | BB–/P | | 775,000 | | 783,967 |
Tomball, Hosp. Auth. Rev. Bonds (Tomball | | | | | |
Regl. Hosp.), 6s, 7/1/25 | Baa3 | | 4,945,000 | | 5,003,747 |
TX Muni. Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp. I | | | | | |
Rev. Bonds, Ser. A, 5 1/4s, 12/15/26 | A1 | | 5,000,000 | | 4,888,450 |
TX State Tpk. Auth. Central TX Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. A, AMBAC, zero %, 8/15/26 | Aaa | | 1,150,000 | | 459,759 |
| | | | | 66,759,883 |
|
|
Utah (0.4%) | | | | | |
Carbon Cnty., Solid Waste Disp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Laidlaw Env.), Ser. A | | | | | |
7 1/2s, 2/1/10 | BB– | | 1,000,000 | | 1,009,930 |
7.45s, 7/1/17 | BB–/P | | 600,000 | | 618,696 |
Tooele Cnty., Harbor & Term. Dist. Port | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Union Pacific), Ser. A, | | | | | |
5.7s, 11/1/26 | Baa2 | | 3,000,000 | | 3,035,610 |
| | | | | 4,664,236 |
|
|
Vermont (0.2%) | | | | | |
VT Hsg. Fin. Agcy. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
Ser. 22, FSA, 5s, 11/1/34 | Aaa | | 805,000 | | 816,528 |
(Single Fam.), Ser. 23, FSA, 5s, 5/1/34 | Aaa | | 1,200,000 | | 1,251,264 |
| | | | | 2,067,792 |
50
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
Virginia (2.6%) | | | | | |
Albemarle Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Res. | | | | | |
Care Fac. Rev. Bonds (Westminster- | | | | | |
Canterbury), 5s, 1/1/31 | B+/P | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 954,096 |
Henrico Cnty., Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(United Methodist), Ser. A, 6 1/2s, 6/1/22 | BB+/P | | 3,000,000 | | 3,089,340 |
Henrico Cnty., Econ. Dev. Auth. Res. Care | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (United Methodist), Ser. A | | | | | |
6.7s, 6/1/27 | BB+/P | | 3,860,000 | | 3,962,599 |
6.7s, 6/1/27 (Prerefunded) | BB+/P | | 1,390,000 | | 1,613,470 |
Hopewell, Indl. Dev. Auth. Env. Impt. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.), | | | | | |
5 1/4s, 6/1/15 | CCC+ | | 2,000,000 | | 1,923,420 |
James Cnty., Indl. Dev. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Williamsburg), Ser. A, 6 1/8s, 3/1/32 | BB–/P | | 2,500,000 | | 2,516,600 |
Peninsula Ports Auth. Rev. Bonds (VA | | | | | |
Baptist Homes), Ser. A, 7 3/8s, 12/1/32 | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | AAA | | 4,000,000 | | 4,949,960 |
Suffolk, Redev. & Hsg. Auth. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Beach-Oxford Apts.) | | | | | |
6 1/4s, 10/1/33 (acquired 8/18/98, | | | | | |
cost $5,510,000) ‡ | BB–/P | | 5,510,000 | | 5,515,400 |
6.1s, 4/1/26 (acquired 8/18/98, | | | | | |
cost $5,000,000) ‡ | BB–/P | | 5,000,000 | | 5,009,600 |
Winchester, Indl. Dev. Auth. Res. Care | | | | | |
Fac. Rev. Bonds (Westminster-Canterbury), | | | | | |
Ser. A | | | | | |
5.3s, 1/1/35 | BB/P | | 2,000,000 | | 1,831,500 |
5.2s, 1/1/27 | BB/P | | 1,300,000 | | 1,209,663 |
| | | | | 32,575,648 |
|
|
Washington (2.6%) | | | | | |
Skagit Cnty., Pub. Hosp. Rev. Bonds (Dist. | | | | | |
No. 001, Skagit Valley Hosp.) | | | | | |
5 3/4s, 12/1/32 | Baa2 | | 2,000,000 | | 1,997,180 |
5 5/8s, 12/1/25 | Baa2 | | 1,330,000 | | 1,331,569 |
Tobacco Settlement Auth. of WA Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
6 5/8s, 6/1/32 | BBB | | 6,250,000 | | 6,413,625 |
6 1/2s, 6/1/26 | BBB | | 10,640,000 | | 11,129,121 |
WA State G.O. Bonds, Ser. E, XLCA | | | | | |
zero %, 12/1/26 | Aaa | | 2,340,000 | | 928,793 |
zero %, 12/1/25 | Aaa | | 1,855,000 | | 782,791 |
WA State Hlth. Care Fac. Auth. Rev. Bonds, | | | | | |
Ser. C, Radian Insd., 5 3/8s, 8/15/28 | AA | | 1,500,000 | | 1,504,965 |
WA State Hsg. Fin. Comm. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Single Fam.), Ser. 3A, GNMA Coll., FNMA | | | | | |
Coll., 4.15s, 12/1/25 | Aaa | | 2,345,000 | | 2,362,236 |
WA State Pub. Pwr. Supply Syst. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Nuclear No. 3), Ser. B, MBIA, 7 1/8s, 7/1/16 | Aaa | | 5,000,000 | | 6,280,750 |
| | | | | 32,731,030 |
51
| | | | | |
MUNICIPAL BONDS AND NOTES (97.5%)* continued | | | | |
|
| Rating** | | Principal amount | | Value |
|
West Virginia (1.3%) | | | | | |
Mason Cnty., Poll. Control FRB | | | | | |
(Appalachian Pwr. Co. Project), Ser. L, | | | | | |
5 1/2s, 10/1/22 | Baa2 | $ | 3,475,000 | $ | 3,547,245 |
Pleasants Cnty., Poll. Control Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
(Allegheny), Ser. F, 5 1/4s, 10/15/37 | Baa2 | | 4,500,000 | | 4,348,665 |
Princeton, Hosp. Rev. Bonds (Cmnty. Hosp. | | | | | |
Assn., Inc.), 6.1s, 5/1/29 | B2 | | 4,525,000 | | 4,445,270 |
WV State G.O. Bonds, Ser. D, FGIC, 6 1/2s, | | | | | |
11/1/26 (Prerefunded) | Aaa | | 3,600,000 | | 4,572,792 |
| | | | | 16,913,972 |
|
|
Wisconsin (1.5%) | | | | | |
Badger, Tobacco Settlement Asset | | | | | |
Securitization Corp. Rev. Bonds | | | | | |
7s, 6/1/28 | BBB | | 2,280,000 | | 2,400,794 |
6 3/8s, 6/1/32 | BBB | | 13,250,000 | | 13,689,370 |
WI State Hlth. & Edl. Fac. Auth. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (Wheaton Franciscan Svcs.), | | | | | |
5 1/8s, 8/15/33 | A- | | 2,500,000 | | 2,252,275 |
| | | | | 18,342,439 |
|
|
Wyoming (0.4%) | | | | | |
Gillette, Poll. Control VRDN, 2.07s, 1/1/18 | P–1 | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 |
Sweetwater Cnty., Poll. Control VRDN | | | | | |
(Pacificorp.), Ser. B, 1.9s, 1/1/14 | P–1 | | 600,000 | | 600,000 |
Sweetwater Cnty., Solid Waste Disp. Rev. | | | | | |
Bonds (FMC Corp.), 5.6s, 12/1/35 | BBB | | 3,000,000 | | 2,849,943 |
| | | | | 4,449,943 |
|
|
Total municipal bonds and notes (cost $1,200,888,053) | | | $ | 1,229,846,454 |
|
|
|
PREFERRED STOCKS (1.6%)* | | | | | |
|
| | | Shares | | Value |
|
Charter Mac. Equity Trust 144A Ser. A, 6.625% cum. pfd. 6/30/09 | | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,097,100 |
GMAC Muni. Mtge. Trust 144A Ser. A1-3, 5.3%, | | | | | |
cum. pfd. 10/31/39 | | | 3,500,000 | | 3,677,870 |
MuniMae Tax Exempt Bond Subsidiary, LLC 144A Ser. B, | | | | |
7 3/4% cum. pfd. 6/30/50 | | | 6,000,000 | | 6,597,300 |
MuniMae Tax Exempt Bond Subsidiary, LLC 144A Ser. A, | | | | |
6.875% cum. pfd. 6/30/40 | | | 6,000,000 | | 6,279,600 |
MuniMae Tax Exempt Bond Subsidiary, LLC Ser. A-2, 4.9%, | | | | |
cum pfd. 6/30/49 | | | 2,000,000 | | 2,068,680 |
|
Total preferred stocks (cost $19,500,000) | | | | $ | 20,720,550 |
52
| | | |
COMMON STOCKS (—%)* (cost $9,057,285) | | | |
|
| Shares | | Value |
|
Tembec, Inc. (Canada) † | 184,103 | $ | 91,703 |
|
TOTAL INVESTMENTS | | | |
|
Total investments (cost $1,229,445,338) | | $ | 1,250,658,707 |
* Percentages indicated are based on net assets of $1,260,981,552.
** The Moody’s or Standard & Poor’s ratings indicated are believed to be the most recent ratings available at January 31, 2008 for the securities listed. Ratings are generally ascribed to securities at the time of issuance. While the agencies may from time to time revise such ratings, they undertake no obligation to do so, and the ratings do not necessarily represent what the agencies would ascribe to these securities at January 31, 2008. Securities rated by Putnam are indicated by “/P.” Securities rated by Fitch are indicated by “/F.” Security ratings are defined in the Statement of Additional Information.
† Non-income-producing security.
†† The interest rate and date shown parenthetically represent the new interest rate to be paid and the date the fund will begin accruing interest at this rate.
‡ Restricted, excluding 144A securities, as to public resale. The total market value of restricted securities held at January 31, 2008 was $19,564,908 or 1.6% of net assets.
(F) Is valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees.
144A after the name of an issuer represents securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.
The rates shown on VRDN, Mandatory Put Bonds, FRB and FRN are the current interest rates at January 31, 2008.
The dates shown on Mandatory Put Bonds are the next mandatory put dates.
The dates shown on debt obligations other than Mandatory Put Bonds are the original maturity dates.
The fund had the following sector concentrations greater than 10% at January 31, 2008 (as a percentage of net assets):
Health care 38.7%
Tobacco 10.2
| | | | | |
TOTAL RETURN SWAP CONTRACTS OUTSTANDING at 1/31/08 (Unaudited) | |
|
|
| | | Fixed payments | Total return | Unrealized |
Swap counterparty / | | Termination | received (paid) by | received by | appreciation/ |
Notional amount | | date | fund per annum | or paid by fund | (depreciation) |
|
Goldman Sachs International | | | | | |
$ 8,000,000 | | 2/28/08 | — | 4.147% minus | $ 576,888 |
| | | | Municipal Market | |
| | | | Data Index AAA | |
| | | | municipal yields | |
| | | | 10 Year rate | |
|
Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc. | | | | | |
50,000,000 | | 3/10/08 | — | 4.17% minus | (438,000) |
| | | | Municipal Market | |
| | | | Data Index AAA | |
| | | | municipal yields | |
| | | | 10 Year rate | |
|
8,000,000 | | 2/29/08 | — | 4.27% minus | 485,842 |
| | | | Lehman Brothers | |
| | | | Municipal Swap | |
| | | | Index | |
|
Total | | | | | $ 624,730 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | |
53
Statement of assets and liabilities 1/31/08 (Unaudited)
| |
ASSETS | |
|
Investment in securities, at value (Note 1): | |
Unaffiliated issuers (identified cost $1,229,445,338) | $1,250,658,707 |
|
Interest and other receivables | 16,894,267 |
|
Receivable for shares of the fund sold | 508,748 |
|
Receivable for securities sold | 9,876,594 |
|
Receivable from Manager (Note 2) | 126,040 |
|
Unrealized appreciation on swap contracts (Note 1) | 1,062,730 |
|
Receivable for variation margin (Note 1) | 398,966 |
|
Total assets | 1,279,526,052 |
|
|
LIABILITIES | |
|
Payable to custodian (Note 2) | 10,055,098 |
|
Distributions payable to shareholders | 1,936,789 |
|
Payable for securities purchased | 2,090,271 |
|
Payable for shares of the fund repurchased | 2,196,090 |
|
Payable for compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 1,063,975 |
|
Payable for investor servicing (Note 2) | 52,586 |
|
Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 300,090 |
|
Payable for administrative services (Note 2) | 2,266 |
|
Payable for distribution fees (Note 2) | 295,311 |
|
Unrealized depreciation on swap contracts (Note 1) | 438,000 |
|
Other accrued expenses | 114,024 |
|
Total liabilities | 18,544,500 |
|
Net assets | $1,260,981,552 |
|
|
REPRESENTED BY | |
|
Paid-in capital (Unlimited shares authorized) (Notes 1 and 4) | $1,406,796,059 |
|
Undistributed net investment income (Note 1) | 5,248,737 |
|
Accumulated net realized loss on investments (Note 1) | (172,901,343) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | 21,838,099 |
|
Total — Representing net assets applicable to capital shares outstanding | $1,260,981,552 |
(Continued on next page)
54
Statement of assets and liabilities (Continued)
| |
COMPUTATION OF NET ASSET VALUE AND OFFERING PRICE | |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per class A share | |
($1,151,327,159 divided by 91,270,405 shares) | $12.61 |
|
Offering price per class A share | |
(100/96.00 of $12.61)* | $13.14 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class B share | |
($81,168,593 divided by 6,424,429 shares)** | $12.63 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class C share | |
($18,868,480 divided by 1,494,927 shares)** | $12.62 |
|
Net asset value and redemption price per class M share | |
($9,564,091 divided by 758,288 shares) | $12.61 |
|
Offering price per class M share | |
(100/96.75 of $12.61)*** | $13.03 |
|
Net asset value and offering price per class Y share | |
($53,229 divided by 4,220 shares) | $12.61 |
* On single retail sales of less than $100,000. On sales of $100,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
** Redemption price per share is equal to net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. \
*** On single retail sales of less than $50,000. On sales of $50,000 or more the offering price is reduced.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
55
Statement of operations Six months ended 1/31/08 (Unaudited)
| |
INTEREST INCOME | $ 37,803,848 |
|
|
EXPENSES | |
|
Compensation of Manager (Note 2) | 3,256,966 |
|
Investor servicing fees (Note 2) | 442,489 |
|
Custodian fees (Note 2) | 19,708 |
|
Trustee compensation and expenses (Note 2) | 26,735 |
|
Administrative services (Note 2) | 13,475 |
|
Distribution fees — Class A (Note 2) | 1,302,895 |
|
Distribution fees — Class B (Note 2) | 391,310 |
|
Distribution fees — Class C (Note 2) | 95,830 |
|
Distribution fees — Class M (Note 2) | 24,762 |
|
Other | 160,392 |
|
Non-recurring costs (Notes 2 and 5) | 2,221 |
|
Costs assumed by Manager (Notes 2 and 5) | (2,221) |
|
Fees waived and reimbursed by Manager (Note 2) | (7,210) |
|
Total expenses | 5,727,352 |
|
Expense reduction (Note 2) | (182,949) |
|
Net expenses | 5,544,403 |
|
Net investment income | 32,259,445 |
|
Net realized loss on investments (Notes 1 and 3) | (9,500,781) |
|
Net realized gain on swap contracts (Note 1) | 256,371 |
|
Net realized gain on futures contracts (Note 1) | 2,236,091 |
|
Net unrealized depreciation of investments, futures | |
contracts and swap contracts during the period | (21,272,579) |
|
Net loss on investments | (28,280,898) |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ 3,978,547 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
56
Statement of changes in net assets
| | |
DECREASE IN NET ASSETS | | |
| Six months ended | Year ended |
| 1/31/08* | 7/31/07 |
|
Operations: | | |
Net investment income | $ 32,259,445 | $ 67,107,975 |
|
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | | |
and foreign currency transactions | (7,008,319) | 5,692,183 |
|
Net unrealized depreciation of investments | (21,272,579) | (12,613,497) |
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | 3,978,547 | 60,186,661 |
|
Distributions to shareholders (Note 1): | | |
|
From ordinary income | | |
|
Taxable net investment income | | |
|
Class A | (230,106) | (467,897) |
|
Class B | (17,434) | (53,517) |
|
Class C | (3,715) | (7,815) |
|
Class M | (1,925) | (4,227) |
|
From tax-exempt net investment income | | |
|
Class A | (28,467,051) | (59,777,747) |
|
Class B | (1,927,015) | (5,620,192) |
|
Class C | (385,554) | (808,760) |
|
Class M | (224,516) | (505,894) |
|
Class Y | (167) | — |
|
Redemption fees (Note 1) | 1,403 | — |
|
Decrease from capital share transactions (Note 4) | (61,888,444) | (138,925,383) |
|
Total decrease in net assets | (89,165,977) | (145,984,771) |
|
|
NET ASSETS | | |
|
Beginning of period | 1,350,147,529 | 1,496,132,300 |
|
End of period (including undistributed net investment income | | |
of $5,248,737 and $4,246,775, respectively) | $1,260,981,552 | $1,350,147,529 |
* Unaudited
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
57
Financial highlights (For a common share outstanding throughout the period)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
INVESTMENT OPERATIONS: | | | | LESS DISTRIBUTIONS: | | | | RATIOS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: | |
|
| | | Net | | | | | | Total | | | Ratio of net | |
| Net asset | | realized and | Total | From | | | Net asset | return | Net | Ratio of | investment | |
| value, | Net | unrealized | from | net | | | value, | at net | assets, | expenses to | income (loss) | Portfolio |
| beginning | investment | gain (loss) on | investment | investment | Total | Redemption | end | asset | end of period | average net | to average | turnover |
Period ended | of period | income (loss) | investments | operations | income | distributions | fees | of period | value (%)(a) | (in thousands) | assets (%)(b) | net assets (%) | (%) |
|
CLASS A | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008** | $12.88 | .30(c) | (.26) | .04 | (.31) | (.31) | —(d) | $12.61 | .32* | $1,151,327 | .41(c) * | 2.52(c) * | 21.34* |
July 31, 2007 | 12.95 | .62(c) | (.07) | .55 | (.62) | (.62) | — | 12.88 | 4.26 | 1,216,301 | .82(c) | 4.72(c) | 10.25 |
July 31, 2006 | 13.02 | .62(c) | (.09) | .53 | (.60) | (.60) | —(d) | 12.95 | 4.21 | 1,293,442 | .82(c) | 4.73(c) | 16.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 12.46 | .60(c) | .57 | 1.17 | (.61) | (.61) | —(d) | 13.02 | 9.59 | 1,375,968 | .85(c) | 4.77(c) | 21.33 |
July 31, 2004 | 12.31 | .68(c) | .15 | .83 | (.68) | (.68) | — | 12.46 | 6.87 | 798,737 | .92(c) | 5.43(c) | 18.25 |
July 31, 2003 | 12.88 | .74 | (.57) | .17 | (.74) | (.74) | — | 12.31 | 1.34 | 1,000,769 | .91 | 5.83 | 28.90 |
|
|
CLASS B | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008** | $12.90 | .26(c) | (.26) | —(d) | (.27) | (.27) | —(d) | $12.63 | .01* | $81,169 | .73(c) * | 2.20(c) * | 21.34* |
July 31, 2007 | 12.97 | .54(c) | (.07) | .47 | (.54) | (.54) | — | 12.90 | 3.67 | 103,765 | 1.45(c) | 4.09(c) | 10.25 |
July 31, 2006 | 13.04 | .53(c) | (.08) | .45 | (.52) | (.52) | —(d) | 12.97 | 3.60 | 169,789 | 1.45(c) | 4.09(c) | 16.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 12.48 | .52(c) | .57 | 1.09 | (.53) | (.53) | —(d) | 13.04 | 8.82 | 242,213 | 1.49(c) | 4.15(c) | 21.33 |
July 31, 2004 | 12.33 | .60(c) | .15 | .75 | (.60) | (.60) | — | 12.48 | 6.16 | 180,830 | 1.57(c) | 4.78(c) | 18.25 |
July 31, 2003 | 12.90 | .67 | (.57) | .10 | (.67) | (.67) | — | 12.33 | .82 | 222,970 | 1.43 | 5.32 | 28.90 |
|
|
CLASS C | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008** | $12.88 | .25(c) | (.25) | —(d) | (.26) | (.26) | —(d) | $12.62 | .05* | $18,868 | .80(c) * | 2.13(c) * | 21.34* |
July 31, 2007 | 12.96 | .52(c) | (.08) | .44 | (.52) | (.52) | — | 12.88 | 3.35 | 19,265 | 1.60(c) | 3.95(c) | 10.25 |
July 31, 2006 | 13.02 | .51(c) | (.07) | .44 | (.50) | (.50) | —(d) | 12.96 | 3.44 | 21,381 | 1.60(c) | 3.95(c) | 16.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 12.47 | .50(c) | .56 | 1.06 | (.51) | (.51) | —(d) | 13.02 | 8.64 | 23,054 | 1.64(c) | 3.97(c) | 21.33 |
July 31, 2004 | 12.31 | .58(c) | .16 | .74 | (.58) | (.58) | — | 12.47 | 6.11 | 10,600 | 1.72(c) | 4.64(c) | 18.25 |
July 31, 2003 | 12.89 | .64 | (.58) | .06 | (.64) | (.64) | — | 12.31 | .45 | 12,028 | 1.71 | 5.02 | 28.90 |
|
|
CLASS M | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008** | $12.88 | .28(c) | (.26) | .02 | (.29) | (.29) | —(d) | $12.61 | .21* | $9,564 | .55(c) * | 2.37(c) * | 21.34* |
July 31, 2007 | 12.95 | .58(c) | (.07) | .51 | (.58) | (.58) | — | 12.88 | 4.01 | 10,816 | 1.10(c) | 4.44(c) | 10.25 |
July 31, 2006 | 13.01 | .58(c) | (.07) | .51 | (.57) | (.57) | —(d) | 12.95 | 3.97 | 11,521 | 1.10(c) | 4.45(c) | 16.97 |
July 31, 2005 | 12.46 | .56(c) | .56 | 1.12 | (.57) | (.57) | —(d) | 13.01 | 9.17 | 12,567 | 1.14(c) | 4.47(c) | 21.33 |
July 31, 2004 | 12.31 | .64(c) | .15 | .79 | (.64) | (.64) | — | 12.46 | 6.56 | 6,985 | 1.22(c) | 5.13(c) | 18.25 |
July 31, 2003 | 12.89 | .70 | (.58) | .12 | (.70) | (.70) | — | 12.31 | .96 | 10,429 | 1.21 | 5.54 | 28.90 |
|
|
CLASS Y | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, 2008 †** | $12.49 | .04(c) | .14 | .18 | (.06) | (.06) | —(d) | $12.61 | 1.40* | $53 | .05(c) * | .48(c) * | 21.34* |
|
See notes to financial highlights at the end of this section.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Financial highlights (Continued)
* Not annualized.
** Unaudited.
† For the period January 2, 2008 (commencement of operations) to January 31, 2008.
(a) Total return assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.
(b) Includes amounts paid through expense offset arrangements (Note 2).
(c) Reflects an involuntary contractual expense limitation in effect during the period. As a result of such limitation, the expenses of each class reflect a reduction of the following amounts (Note 2):
| |
| Percentage |
| of average |
| net assets |
|
January 31, 2008 | <0.01% |
|
July 31, 2007 | <0.01 |
|
July 31, 2006 | <0.01 |
|
July 31, 2005 | 0.02 |
|
July 31, 2004 | 0.02 |
|
(d) Amount represents less than $0.01 per share.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
60
Notes to financial statements 1/31/08 (Unaudited)
Note 1: Significant accounting policies
Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund (the “fund”) is a series of Putnam Tax Free Income Trust (the “trust”), a Massachusetts business trust, which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, open end management investment company. The fund pursues its objective of seeking high current income exempt from federal income tax by investing primarily in high-yielding, lower rated tax-exempt securities constituting a portfolio that Putnam Investment Management, LLC (“Putnam Management”), the fund’s manager, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC, believes does not involve undue risk to income or principal. The fund invests in higher yielding, lower rated bonds that may have a higher rate of default.
The fund offers class A, class B, class C, class M and class Y shares. The fund began offering class Y shares on January 2, 2008. Class A and class M shares are sold with a maximum front-end sales charge of 4.00% and 3.25%, respectively, and generally do not pay a contingent deferred sales charge. Class B shares, which convert to class A shares after approximately eight years, do not pay a front-end sales charge and are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge, if those shares are redeemed within six years of purchase. Class C shares have a one-year 1.00% contingent deferred sales charge and do not convert to class A shares. The expenses for class A, class B, class C, and class M shares may differ based on the distribution fee of each class, which is identified in Note 2. Class Y shares, which are sold at net asset value, are generally subject to the same expenses as class A, class B, class C, and class M shares, but do not bear a distribution fee. Class Y shar es are generally only available to corporate and institutional clients and clients in other approved programs.
A 1.00% redemption fee may apply on any shares that are redeemed (either by selling or exchanging into another fund) within 7 days of purchase. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in-capital.
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses and expenses of the fund are borne pro-rata based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund, except that each class bears expenses unique to that class (including the distribution fees applicable to such classes). Each class votes as a class only with respect to its own distribution plan or other matters on which a class vote is required by law or determined by the Trustees. If the fund were liquidated, shares of each class would receive their pro-rata share of the net assets of the fund. In addition, the Trustees declare separate dividends on each class of shares.
In the normal course of business, the fund enters into contracts that may include agreements to indemnify another party under given circumstances. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be, but have not yet been, made against the fund. However, the fund expects the risk of material loss to be remote.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The preparation of financial statements is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A) Security valuation Tax-exempt bonds and notes are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by an independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. Such services use information with respect to transactions in bonds, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various relationships between securities in determining value. Certain investments and derivatives are also valued at fair value following procedures approved by the
61
Trustees. Such valuations and procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably expect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security at a given point in time and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.
Investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the last reported sales price on their principal exchange, or official closing price for certain markets. If no sales are reported — as in the case of some securities traded over-the-counter — a security is valued at its last reported bid price. Market quotations are not considered to be readily available for certain debt obligations; such investments are valued on the basis of valuations furnished by an independent pricing service approved by the Trustees or dealers selected by Putnam Management. Such services or dealers determine valuations for normal institutional-size trading units of such securities using methods based on market transactions for comparable securities and various relationships, generally recognized by institutional traders, between securities. Many securities markets and exchanges outside the U.S. close prior to the close of the New York Stock Exchange and ther efore the closing prices for securities in such markets or on such exchanges may not fully reflect events that occur after such close but before the close of the New York Stock Exchange. Accordingly, on certain days, the fund will fair value foreign equity securities taking into account multiple factors, including movements in the U.S. securities markets. The number of days on which fair value prices will be used will depend on market activity and it is possible that fair value prices will be used by the fund to a significant extent. Securities quoted in foreign currencies, if any, are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. Certain investments, including certain restricted securities and derivatives, are also valued at fair value following procedures approved by the Trustees. Such valuations and procedures are reviewed periodically by the Trustees. The fair value of securities is generally determined as the amount that the fund could reasonably ex pect to realize from an orderly disposition of such securities over a reasonable period of time. By its nature, a fair value price is a good faith estimate of the value of a security at a given point in time and does not reflect an actual market price, which may be different by a material amount.
B) Security transactions and related investment income Security transactions are recorded on the trade date (the date the order to buy or sell is executed). Gains or losses on securities sold are determined on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Non-cash dividends, if any, are recorded at the fair market value of the securities received. Dividends representing a return of capital or capital gains, if any, are reflected as a reduction of cost and/or as a realized gain. All premiums/discounts are amortized/accreted on a yield-to-maturity basis. The premium in excess of the call price, if any, is amortized to the call date; thereafter, any remaining premium is amortized to maturity.
C) Futures and options contracts The fund may use futures and options contracts to hedge against changes in the values of securities the fund owns, owned or expects to purchase, or for other investment purposes. The fund may also write options on swaps or securities it owns or in which it may invest to increase its current returns.
The potential risk to the fund is that the change in value of futures and options contracts may not correspond to the change in value of the hedged instruments. In addition, losses may arise from changes in the value of the underlying instruments, if there is an illiquid secondary market for the contracts, or if the counterparty to the contract is unable to perform. Risks may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. When the contract is closed, the fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at
62
the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Realized gains and losses on purchased options are included in realized gains and losses on investment securities. If a written call option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as an addition to sales proceeds. If a written put option is exercised, the premium originally received is recorded as a reduction to the cost of investments.
Futures contracts are valued at the quoted daily settlement prices established by the exchange on which they trade. The fund and the broker agree to exchange an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the futures contract. Such receipts or payments are known as “variation margin.” Exchange traded options are valued at the last sale price or, if no sales are reported, the last bid price for purchased options and the last ask price for written options. Options traded over-the-counter are valued using prices supplied by dealers. Futures and written option contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
D) Total return swap contracts The fund may enter into total return swap contracts, which are arrangements to exchange a market linked return for a periodic payment, both based on a notional principal amount. To the extent that the total return of the security, index or other financial measure underlying the transaction exceeds or falls short of the offsetting interest rate obligation, the fund will receive a payment from or make a payment to the counterparty. Total return swap contracts are marked to market daily based upon quotations from market makers and the change, if any, is recorded as an unrealized gain or loss. Payments received or made are recorded as a realized gains or loss. Certain total return swap contracts may include extended effective dates. Income related to these swap contracts is accrued based on the terms of the contract. The fund could be exposed to credit or market risk due to unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or in the price of the underlying security or index, the possibility that there is no liquid market for these agreements or that the counterparty may default on its obligation to perform. Risk of loss may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. Total return swap contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
E) Interest rate swap contracts The fund may enter into interest rate swap contracts, which are arrangements between two parties to exchange cash flows based on a notional principal amount, to manage the fund’s exposure to interest rates. Interest rate swap contracts are marked to market daily based upon quotations from an independent pricing service or market makers and the change, if any, is recorded as an unrealized gain or loss. Payments received or made are recorded as a realized gains or loss. Certain interest rate swap contracts may include extended effective dates. Income related to these swap contracts is accrued based on the terms of the contract. The fund could be exposed to credit or market risk due to unfavorable changes in the fluctuation of interest rates or if the counterparty defaults on its obligation to perform. Risk of loss may exceed amounts recognized on the Statement of assets and liabilities. In terest rate swap contracts outstanding at period end, if any, are listed after the fund’s portfolio.
F) Federal taxes It is the policy of the fund to distribute all of its income within the prescribed time and otherwise comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies. It is also the intention of the fund to distribute an amount sufficient to avoid imposition of any excise tax under Section 4982 of the Code, as amended. Therefore, no provision has been made for federal taxes on income, capital gains or unrealized appreciation on securities held nor for excise tax on income and capital gains.
At July 31, 2007, the fund had a capital loss carryover of $160,897,548 available to the extent allowed by the Code to offset future net capital gain, if any. The amount of the carryover and the expiration dates are:
63
| |
Loss Carryover | Expiration |
|
$ 8,579,409 | July 31, 2008 |
|
1,682,906 | July 31, 2009 |
|
1,466,587 | July 31, 2010 |
|
24,697,987 | July 31, 2011 |
|
87,799,907 | July 31, 2012 |
|
36,670,752 | July 31, 2013 |
|
The aggregate identified cost on a tax basis is $1,228,802,701, resulting in gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of $59,254,475 and $37,398,469, respectively, or net unrealized appreciation of $21,856,006.
G) Distributions to shareholders Income dividends are recorded daily by the fund and are paid monthly. Distributions from capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date and paid at least annually. The amount and character of income and gains to be distributed are determined in accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from generally accepted accounting principles. Dividend sources are estimated at the time of declaration. Actual results may vary. Any non-taxable return of capital cannot be determined until final tax calculations are completed after the end of the fund’s fiscal year. Reclassifications are made to the fund’s capital accounts to reflect income and gains available for distribution (or available capital loss carryovers) under income tax regulations.
H) Expenses of the trust Expenses directly charged or attributable to any fund will be paid from the assets of that fund. Generally, expenses of the trust will be allocated among and charged to the assets of each fund on a basis that the Trustees deem fair and equitable, which may be based on the relative assets of each fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each fund.
Note 2: Management fee, administrative services and other transactions
Putnam Management is paid for management and investment advisory services monthly based on the average net assets of the fund. Such fee is based on the lesser of (i) an annual rate of 0.50% of the average net asset value of the fund or (ii) the following annual rates: 0.60% of the first $500 million of average net assets, 0.50% of the next $500 million, 0.45% of the next $500 million, 0.40% of the next $5 billion, 0.375% of the next $5 billion, 0.355% of the next $5 billion, and 0.34% of the next $5 billion and 0.33% thereafter.
Putnam Management has agreed to waive fees and reimburse expenses of the fund through June 30, 2009 to the extent necessary to ensure that the fund’s expenses do not exceed the simple average of the expenses of all front-end load funds viewed by Lipper Inc. as having the same investment classification or objective as the fund. The expense reimbursement is based on a comparison of the fund’s expenses with the average annualized operating expenses of the funds in its Lipper peer group for each calendar quarter during the fund’s last fiscal year, excluding 12b-1 fees and without giving effect to any expense offset and brokerage service arrangements that may reduce fund expenses. For the period ended January 31, 2008, Putnam Management waived $7,210 of its management fee from the fund.
For the period ended January 31, 2008, Putnam Management has assumed $2,221 of legal, shareholder servicing and communication, audit and Trustee fees incurred by the fund in connection with certain legal and regulatory matters (including those described in Note 5).
The fund reimburses Putnam Management an allocated amount for the compensation and related expenses of certain officers of the fund and their staff who provide administrative services to the fund. The aggregate amount of all such reimbursements is determined annually by the Trustees.
64
Custodial services for the fund’s assets were provided by Putnam Fiduciary Trust Company (“PFTC”), an affiliate of Putnam Management, and by State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”). Custody fees are based on the fund’s asset level, the number of its security holdings, transaction volumes and with respect to PFTC, certain fees related to the transition of assets to State Street. Putnam Investor Services, a division of PFTC, provided investor servicing agent functions to the fund. Putnam Investor Services received fees for investor servicing, subject to certain limitations, based on the number of shareholder accounts in the fund and the level of defined contribution plan assets in the fund. During the period ended January 31, 2008, the fund incurred $453,378 for custody and investor servicing agent functions provided by PFTC.
The fund has entered into arrangements with PFTC and State Street whereby PFTC’s and State Street’s fees are reduced by credits allowed on cash balances. For the six months ended January 31, 2008, the fund’s expenses were reduced by $182,949 under these arrangements.
Each independent Trustee of the fund receives an annual Trustee fee, of which $519, as a quarterly retainer, has been allocated to the fund, and an additional fee for each Trustees meeting attended. Trustees receive additional fees for attendance at certain committee meetings and industry seminars and for certain compliance-related matters. Trustees also are reimbursed for expenses they incur relating to their services as Trustees.
The fund has adopted a Trustee Fee Deferral Plan (the “Deferral Plan”) which allows the Trustees to defer the receipt of all or a portion of Trustees fees payable on or after July 1, 1995. The deferred fees remain invested in certain Putnam funds until distribution in accordance with the Deferral Plan.
The fund has adopted an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Plan”) covering all Trustees of the fund who have served as a Trustee for at least five years and were first elected prior to 2004. Benefits under the Pension Plan are equal to 50% of the Trustee’s average annual attendance and retainer fees for the three years ended December 31, 2005. The retirement benefit is payable during a Trustee’s lifetime, beginning the year following retirement, for the number of years of service through December 31, 2006. Pension expense for the fund is included in Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of operations. Accrued pension liability is included in Payable for Trustee compensation and expenses in the Statement of assets and liabilities. The Trustees have terminated the Pension Plan with respect to any Trustee first elected after 2003.
The fund has adopted distribution plans (the “Plans”) with respect to its class A, class B, class C and class M shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The purpose of the Plans is to compensate Putnam Retail Management, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Putnam, LLC and Putnam Retail Management GP, Inc., for services provided and expenses incurred in distributing shares of the fund. The Plans provide for payments by the fund to Putnam Retail Management at an annual rate of up to 0.35%, 1.00%, 1.00% and 1.00% of the average net assets attributable to class A, class B, class C and class M shares, respectively. The Trustees have approved payment by the fund at the annual rate of 0.85%, 1.00% and 0.50% of the average net assets for class B, class C and class M shares, respectively. For class A shares, the annual payment rate will equal the weighted average of (i) 0.20% on the net assets of the fund attributable to class A shares purch ased and paid for prior to March 21, 2005 and (ii) 0.25% on all other net assets of the fund attributable to class A shares.
For the period ended January 31, 2008, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received net commissions of $27,066 and $342 from the sale of class A and class M shares, respectively, and received $25,957 and $391 in contingent deferred sales charges from redemptions of class B and class C shares, respectively.
65
A deferred sales charge of up to 1.00% is assessed on certain redemptions of class A shares that were purchased without an initial sales charge as part of an investment of $1 million or more. For the period ended January 31, 2008, Putnam Retail Management, acting as underwriter, received $10,739 and no monies on class A and class M redemptions, respectively.
Note 3: Purchases and sales of securities
During the six months ended January 31, 2008, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investment securities other than short-term investments aggregated $270,329,741 and $328,788,339, respectively. There were no purchases or sales of U.S. government securities.
Note 4: Capital shares
At January 31, 2008, there was an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized. Transactions in capital shares were as follows:
| | | |
CLASS A | Shares | Amount | |
| |
Six months ended 1/31/08: | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 2,791,103 | $ 35,343,684 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 1,478,883 | 18,696,675 | |
| |
| 4,269,986 | 54,040,359 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (7,459,337) | (94,354,814) | |
| |
Net decrease | (3,189,351) | $ (40,314,455) | |
| |
Year ended 7/31/07: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 6,632,710 | $ 86,595,781 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 3,086,685 | 40,261,377 | |
| |
| 9,719,395 | 126,857,158 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (15,122,711) | (197,245,378) | |
| |
Net decrease | (5,403,316) | $ (70,388,220) | |
| | | |
CLASS B | Shares | Amount | |
| |
Six months ended 1/31/08: | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 70,147 | $ 890,363 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 84,209 | 1,066,517 | |
| |
| 154,356 | 1,956,880 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (1,775,935) | (22,545,210) | |
| |
Net decrease | (1,621,579) | $(20,588,330) | |
| |
Year ended 7/31/07: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 290,410 | $ 3,794,828 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 245,505 | 3,209,898 | |
| |
| 535,915 | 7,004,726 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (5,577,970) | (72,874,862) | |
| |
Net decrease | (5,042,055) | $(65,870,136) | |
| |
| |
CLASS C | Shares | Amount | |
| |
Six months ended 1/31/08: | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 118,172 | $ 1,495,543 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 17,345 | 219,386 | |
| |
| 135,517 | 1,714,929 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (135,911) | (1,724,030) | |
| |
Net decrease | (394) | $ (9,101) | |
| |
Year ended 7/31/07: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 174,636 | $ 2,279,447 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 35,457 | 462,620 | |
| |
| 210,093 | 2,742,067 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (364,717) | (4,764,262) | |
| |
Net decrease | (154,624) | $(2,022,195) | |
66
| | | |
CLASS M | Shares | Amount | |
| |
Six months ended 1/31/08: | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 44,136 | $ 556,866 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 12,841 | 162,332 | |
| |
| 56,977 | 719,198 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (138,781) | (1,748,803) | |
| |
Net decrease | (81,804) | $(1,029,605) | |
| |
Year ended 7/31/07: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 33,258 | $ 433,262 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 29,391 | 383,369 | |
| |
| 62,649 | 816,631 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (112,069) | (1,461,463) | |
| |
Net decrease | (49,420) | $ (644,832) | |
| |
| |
CLASS Y | Shares | Amount | |
| |
For the period 1/2/08 (commencement of | | |
operations) to 1/31/08: | | | |
| | | |
Shares sold | 4,224 | $53,095 | |
| |
Shares issued | | | |
in connection | | | |
with reinvestment | | | |
of distributions | 13 | 167 | |
| |
| 4,237 | 53,262 | |
| |
Shares | | | |
repurchased | (17) | (215) | |
| |
Net increase | 4,220 | $53,047 | |
At January 31, 2008, Putnam, LLC owned 804 class Y shares of the fund (19% of class Y shares outstanding), valued at $10,138.
Note 5: Regulatory matters and litigation
In late 2003 and 2004, Putnam Management settled charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division in connection with excessive short-term trading in Putnam funds. Payments from Putnam Management will be distributed to certain open-end Putnam funds and their shareholders. These allegations and related matters have served as the general basis for certain lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits against Putnam Management and, in a limited number of cases, some Putnam funds. Putnam Management believes that these lawsuits will have no material adverse effect on the funds or on Putnam Management’s ability to provide investment management services. In addition, Putnam Management has agreed to bear any costs incurred by the Putnam funds as a result of these matters.
Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management are named as defendants in a civil suit in which the plaintiffs allege that the management and distribution fees paid by certain Putnam funds were excessive and seek recovery under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Putnam Management and Putnam Retail Management have contested the plaintiffs’ claims and the matter is currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Based on currently available information, Putnam Management believes that this action is without merit and that it is unlikely to have a material effect on Putnam Management’s and Putnam Retail Management’s ability to provide services to their clients, including the fund.
Note 6: New accounting pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (the “Interpretation”). The Interpretation prescribes a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken by a filer in the filer’s tax return. Upon adoption, the Interpretation did not have a material effect on the fund’s financial statements. However, the conclusions regarding the Interpretation may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors
67
including, but not limited to, further implementation guidance expected from the FASB, and on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (the “Standard”). The Standard defines fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The Standard applies to fair value measurements already required or permitted by existing standards. The Standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Putnam Management is currently evaluating what impact the adoption of the Standard will have on the fund’s financial statements.
68
Fund information
Founded over 70 years ago, Putnam Investments was built around the concept that a balance between risk and reward is the hallmark of a well-rounded financial program. We manage over 100 mutual funds in growth, value, blend, fixed income, and international.
| | |
Investment Manager | W. Thomas Stephens | James P. Pappas |
Putnam Investment | Richard B. Worley | Vice President |
Management, LLC | | |
One Post Office Square | Officers | |
Boston, MA 02109 | Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. | Francis J. McNamara, III |
| President | Vice President and |
Marketing Services | | Chief Legal Officer |
Putnam Retail Management | Charles E. Porter | |
One Post Office Square | Executive Vice President, | Robert R. Leveille |
Boston, MA 02109 | Principal Executive Officer , | Vice President and |
| Associate Treasurer and | Chief Compliance Officer |
Custodian | Compliance Liaison | |
State Street Bank and | | Mark C. Trenchard |
Trust Company | Jonathan S. Horwitz | Vice President and |
| Senior Vice President | BSA Compliance Officer |
Legal Counsel | and Treasurer | |
Ropes & Gray LLP | | Judith Cohen |
| Steven D. Krichmar | Vice President, Clerk and |
Trustees | Vice President and | Assistant Treasurer |
John A. Hill, Chairman | Principal Financial Officer | |
Jameson Adkins Baxter, | | Wanda M. McManus |
Vice Chairman | Janet C. Smith | Vice President, Senior Associate |
Charles B. Curtis | Vice President, Principal | Treasurer and Assistant Clerk |
Robert J. Darretta | Accounting Officer and | |
Myra R. Drucker | Assistant Treasurer | Nancy E. Florek |
Charles E. Haldeman, Jr. | | Vice President, Assistant Clerk, |
Paul L. Joskow | Susan G. Malloy | Assistant Treasurer and |
Elizabeth T. Kennan | Vice President and | Proxy Manager |
Kenneth R. Leibler | Assistant Treasurer | |
Robert E. Patterson | | |
George Putnam, III | Beth S. Mazor | |
| Vice President | |
| | |
This report is for the information of shareholders of Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund. It may also be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, the most recent copy of Putnam’s Quarterly Performance Summary, and Putnam’s Quarterly Ranking Summary. For more recent performance, please visit www.putnam.com. Investors should carefully consider the investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses of a fund, which are described in its prospectus. For this and other information or to request a prospectus, call 1-800-225-1581 toll free. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. The fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the fund’s Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-1581.
Item 2. Code of Ethics:
Not applicable
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert:
Not applicable
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services:
Not applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments:
The registrant’s schedule of investments in unaffiliated issuers is included in the report to shareholders in Item 1 above.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures For Closed-End Management Investment Companies:
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies
Not Applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers:
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders:
Not applicable
Item 11. Controls and Procedures:
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the design and operation of such procedures are generally effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting: Not applicable
Item 12. Exhibits:
(a)(1) Not applicable
(a)(2) Separate certifications for the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
(b) The certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, are filed herewith.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Putnam Tax Free Income Trust
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Janet C. Smith
Janet C. Smith
Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 31, 2008
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Charles E. Porter
Charles E. Porter
Principal Executive Officer
Date: March 31, 2008
By (Signature and Title):
/s/Steven D. Krichmar
Steven D. Krichmar
Principal Financial Officer
Date: March 31, 2008