The Company has options outstanding under two stock option plans, the 1996 Stock Option Plan (the “1996 Plan) and the 2004 Stock Option Plan (the “2004 Plan”). In 2004 the Company terminated the 1996 Plan. This action terminated the 257,000 authorized but unissued options under the 1996 Plan but it did not affect any of the options previously issued under the 1996 Plan.
Options granted under the 1996 Plan are exercisable at prices at least equal to the fair market value of such stock on the dates the options were granted. The options expire five years after the date of grant and are generally exercisable as to 25% of the shares commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and as to an additional 25% commencing on each of the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.
The 2004 Stock Option Plan, which was approved by shareholders, is the Company’s only equity compensation plan currently in effect. Under the 2004 Stock Option Plan, 450,000 options were authorized for future grant. Options granted under the 2004 Plan are exercisable at prices at least equal to the fair market value of such stock on the dates the options were granted. The options expire ten years after the date of grant. During fiscal 2005, options to purchase 194,000 shares of common stock were granted and are exercisable as to 50% of the shares commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and as to an additional 50% commencing on the second anniversary of the date of grant. During fiscal 2007, options to purchase 105,000 shares of common stock were granted and are exercisable as to 25% of the shares commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and as to an additional 25% commencing on each of the second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. During fiscal 2009, options to purchase 176,600 shares of common stock were granted and are exercisable as to 50% of the shares commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and as to an additional 50% commencing on the second anniversary of the date of grant. No options were granted during the 26-week periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009.
The fair value of each of the Company’s stock options is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model that uses assumptions that relate to the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock, the expected dividend yield of our stock, the expected life of the options and the risk free interest rate.
Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period during which employees perform related services. As of April 3, 2010, there was approximately $413,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a period of approximately two years.
Compensation cost for stock options is included in general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated condensed statements of operations. Compensation cost for stock options was approximately $312,000 and $156,000 for the 26-week periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively. Compensation cost for stock options was approximately $156,000 and $78,000 for the 13-week periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009, respectively.
The income tax provisions operations for the 26-week periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 reflect effective tax rates of 25.0% and 53.6% (including the tax benefit disclosed below), respectively. The Company expects its effective tax rate for its current fiscal year to be approximately 23.0% to 27.0%, which is significantly lower than the statutory rate as a result of the utilization of tax credits on lower projected taxable income levels. The final annual tax rate cannot be determined until the end of the fiscal year; therefore, the actual tax rate could differ from our current estimates.
During the thirteen weeks ended March 28, 2009, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $97,000 principally as a result of reducing its long term income tax liability for unrecognized tax benefits due to the resolution of a tax audit.
10. INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
Net income (loss) per share is calculated on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period plus, for diluted earnings per share, the additional dilutive effect of potential common stock. Potential common stock using the treasury stock method consists of dilutive stock options.
For the 13 and 26-week periods ended April 3, 2010, options to purchase 176,600, 145,500 and 100,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices of $12.04, $29.60 and $32.15 per share, respectively, were not included in diluted loss per share as their impact was antidilutive.
For the 13 and 26-week periods ended March 28, 2009, options to purchase 152,500 and 100,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices of $29.60 and $32.15 per share, respectively were not included in diluted earnings per share as their impact was antidilutive.
11. DIVIDENDS
On December 1, 2009 and March 1, 2010, our Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $0.25 per share. We intend to continue to pay such quarterly cash dividends for the foreseeable future, however, the payment of future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and is based on future earnings, cash flow, financial condition, capital requirements, changes in U.S. taxation and other relevant factors.
| |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Overview
The Company had a loss from operations of ($1,372,000) in the second fiscal quarter of 2010 compared to an operating loss of ($1,461,000) in the second fiscal quarter of 2009. This improvement resulted primarily from an increase in management fees of $567,000 combined with improved performance at our non-gaming properties, partially offset by a decrease in performance at our gaming properties.
The Company has substantial fixed costs that do not decline proportionally with sales. The first and second fiscal quarters, which include the winter months, usually reflect lower customer traffic than in the third and fourth fiscal quarters. In addition, sales in the third and fourth fiscal quarters can be adversely affected by inclement weather due to the significant amount of outdoor seating at the Company’s restaurants.
Certain reclassifications of prior period balances have been made to conform to the current period presentation.
Revenues
During the Company’s second fiscal quarter of 2010, total revenues of $25,113,000 increased 5.7% compared to total revenues of $23,756,000 in second fiscal quarter of 2009. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to sales from our new restaurant,Robert, in New York City and higher management fees.
Food and Beverage Sales
On a Company-wide basis, same store sales decreased 2.4% during the second fiscal quarter of 2010 as compared to the same period last year. Same store sales in Las Vegas, which decreased $708,000 or 5.4% in the second fiscal quarter of 2010 as compared to the second fiscal quarter of 2009, were negatively affected by the continued unwillingness of the public to engage in gaming activities and a decrease in tourism and convention business. Same store sales in New York, which increased $508,000 or 12.9% during the second fiscal quarter as compared to the second fiscal quarter of 2009, were positively impacted by the unusually mild March which allowed for the early opening of the Company’s outdoor seating facilities. Same store sales in Washington D.C. decreased $359,000 or 11.7% during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to the same period last year. During the second fiscal quarter of 2009 significant revenue was generated as a result of the inauguration of the President which negatively impacts the quarter to quarter comparison. In addition, Washington D.C. had significant snow storms during the second fiscal quarter of fiscal 2010. Same store sales in Atlantic City decreased $33,000 or 5.6% while same store sales in Connecticut decreased $13,000 or 3.5%. Both locations were negatively affected by the continued unwillingness of the public to engage in gaming activities. Boston same store sales increased $86,000 or 13.4% during the second fiscal quarter of 2010.
During the Company’s 26-week period ended April 3, 2010, total revenues of $50,689,000 were relatively consistent when compared to total revenues of $50,549,000 in the 26-week period ended March 28, 2009, primarily as a result of: (i) a
- 11 -
$983,000 decrease in revenues at our Washington D.C. properties due to a decrease in catered events and poor weather, and (ii) an $852,000 decrease in revenues at our Las Vegas properties due to the continued unwillingness of the public to engage in gaming activities and a decrease in tourism and conventions, offset by revenues of $1,300,000 from our new restaurant,Robert, in New York City which opened in December 2009 and an increase in management fees of $555,000.
Other Income
Other income for the second fiscal quarter of 2010 was $1,226,000 compared to $598,000 in the second fiscal quarter of 2009; an increase of 105% due primarily to an increase in management fees from the Company’s unconsolidated managed restaurants.
Costs and Expenses
Food and beverage costs for the second quarter of 2010 as a percentage of total revenues were 25.8% and have remained relatively consistent as compared to 25.6% in the second quarter of 2009. These costs for the 26-weeks ended April 3, 2010 as a percentage of total revenues were 25.7% compared to 25.3% in the 26-week period ended March 28, 2009.
Payroll expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 35.0% for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to 34.5% in the second quarter of 2009. Payroll expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 35.1% for the 26-week period ended April 3, 2010 as compared to 33.7% for the 26-week period ended March 28, 2009. The increase in payroll expenses as a percentage of revenue, for the 13 and 26-week periods ended April 3, 2010, was primarily due to the opening of our new restaurant,Robert, in New York City, salary increases and increased unemployment insurance costs.
Occupancy expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 15.3% for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to 17.3% in the second quarter of 2009. Occupancy expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 15.9% for the 26-week period ended April 3, 2010 as compared to 16.3% for the 26-week period ended March 28, 2009. These decreases were due primarily to a one-time expense of $220,000 in the second fiscal quarter of 2009 for a real estate tax adjustment related to a restaurant in Washington D.C.
Other operating costs and expenses remained relatively stable as a percentage of total revenues and were 14.8% for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to 14.6% in the second quarter of 2009 and 14.4% for the 26-week period ended April 3, 2010 as compared to 14.1% for the 26-week period ended March 28, 2009.
General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 10.5% for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to 10.5% in the second quarter of 2009 as additional costs of $78,000 associated with share-based compensation charges were offset by an increase in total revenues. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 10.0% for the 26-week period ended April 3, 2010 as compared to 9.2% for the 26-week period ended March 28, 2009. This increase in general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to increased professional fees of $100,000 and additional share-based compensation of $156,000.
Income Taxes
The income tax provisions for the 26-week periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 reflect effective tax rates of 25.0% and 53.6% (including the tax benefits previously disclosed), respectively. The Company expects its effective tax rate for its current fiscal year to be approximately 23.0% to 27.0%, which is significantly lower than the statutory rate as a result of the utilization of tax credits on lower projected taxable income levels. The final annual tax rate cannot be determined until the end of the fiscal year; therefore, the actual tax rate could differ from our current estimates.
The Company’s overall effective tax rate in the future will be affected by factors such as the level of losses incurred at the Company’s New York facilities, which cannot be consolidated for state and local tax purposes, pre-tax income earned outside of New York City, the utilization of state and local net operating loss carryforwards and the utilization of FICA tax credits. Nevada has no state income tax and other states in which the Company operates have income tax rates substantially lower in comparison to New York. In order to utilize more effectively tax loss carryforwards at restaurants that were unprofitable, the Company has merged certain profitable subsidiaries with certain loss subsidiaries.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of capital has been cash provided by operations. We have, from time to time, also utilized equipment financing in connection with the construction of a restaurant and seller financing in connection with the acquisition of a restaurant. We utilize cash from operations primarily to fund the cost of developing and opening new restaurants, acquiring existing restaurants owned by others and remodeling existing restaurants we own.
- 12 -
Net cash provided by investing activities for the 26-week period ended April 3, 2010 was $5,286,000 and resulted from net proceeds from the sales of investment securities partially offset by purchases of fixed assets at existing restaurants and the construction ofRobertin New York City.
Net cash provided by investing activities for the 26-week period ended March 28, 2009 was $2,578,000 and resulted from net proceeds from the sales of investment securities partially offset by purchases of fixed assets at existing restaurants and the construction ofYolos,a Mexican restaurant located at the Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino located in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Net cash used in financing activities for the 26-week periods ended April 3, 2010 and March 28, 2009 of $5,291,000 and $2,104,000, respectively, was principally used for the payment of dividends and purchases of treasury stock.
The Company had a working capital surplus of $3,268,000 at April 3, 2010 as compared to a working capital surplus of $5,883,000 at October 3, 2009.
A quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.44 per share was declared on October 12, 2007 and January 11, April 11, July 11 and October 10, 2008. On September 16, 2009, our Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend in the amount of $1.00 per share. On December 1, 2009 and March 1, 2010, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.25 per share. We intend to continue to pay such quarterly cash dividend for the foreseeable future, however, the payment of future dividends is at the discretion of our Board of Directors and is based on future earnings, cash flow, financial condition, capital requirements, changes in U.S. taxation and other relevant factors.
In February 2010, the Company entered into an amendment to its lease for the food court space at theNew York-NewYork Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. Pursuant to this amendment, the Company agreed to, among other things, commit no less than $3,000,000 to remodel the food court by March 2012. In exchange for this commitment the landlord agreed to extend the food court lease for an additional four years.
- 13 -
Recent Restaurant Expansion
In June 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to design and lease a restaurant,Robert, at The Museum of Arts & Design at Columbus Circle in New York City. The initial term of the lease for this facility will expire on December 31, 2024 and has two five-year renewals. This restaurant opened during the first quarter of fiscal 2010 and as a result the consolidated condensed statement of operations for the 26 weeks ended April 3, 2010 includes $439,000 of pre-opening and early operating losses related to this facility.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements requires the application of certain accounting policies, which may require the Company to make estimates and assumptions of future events. In the process of preparing its consolidated condensed financial statements, the Company estimates the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, which are not readily apparent from other sources. The primary estimates underlying the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements include allowances for potential bad debts on accounts and notes receivable, leases, the useful lives and recoverability of its assets, such as property and intangibles, fair values of financial instruments, the realizable value of its tax assets and other matters. Management bases its estimates on certain assumptions, which they believe are reasonable in the circumstances, and actual results could differ from those estimates. Although management does not believe that any change in those assumptions in the near term would have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or the results of operations, differences in actual results could be material to the consolidated condensed financial statements.
The Company’s critical accounting policies are described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 3, 2009. There have been no significant changes to such policies during fiscal 2010, other than the implementation of new authoritative guidance to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including those adopted in fiscal 2010 and the expected dates of adoption and the anticipated impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
| |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
The Company purchases commodities such as chicken, beef, lobster and shrimp for the Company’s restaurants. The prices of these commodities may be volatile depending upon market conditions. The Company does not purchase forward commodity contracts because the changes in prices for these items have historically been short-term in nature and, in the Company’s view, the cost of the contracts is in excess of the benefits.
The Company’s business is also highly seasonal and dependent on the weather. Outdoor seating capacity, such as terraces and sidewalk cafes, are available for dining only in the warm seasons and then only in clement weather.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of April 3, 2010 to ensure that all material information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to them as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and that all such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the second quarter of fiscal 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations of the Effectiveness of Internal Control
A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations of any internal control system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within a company have been detected.
- 14 -
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
| |
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
The Company is not subject to any other pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine claims incidental to its business, which the Company does not believe will materially impact results of operations.
The most significant risk factors applicable to the Company are described in Part I, Item 1A (Risk Factors) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2009 (the “2009 Form 10-K”). There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the 2009 Form 10-K. The risks described in the 2009 Form 10-K are not the only risks facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to management may materially adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and/or operating results.
| |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
The following table sets forth information regarding purchases of our common stock by us and any affiliated purchasers during the 13 weeks ended April 3, 2010.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | (a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) | | (c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Month #1 January 3, 2010 through February 2, 2010 | | | 0 | | | Not Applicable | | | 0 | | | 393,043 | |
Month #2 February 3, 2010 through March 5, 2010 | | | 0 | | | Not Applicable | | | 0 | | | 393,043 | |
Month #3 March 6, 2010 through April 3, 2010 | | | 0 | | | Not Applicable | | | 0 | | | 393,043 | |
Total | | | 0 | | | Not Applicable | | | 0 | | | 393,043 | |
(1) On March 25, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which up to 500,000 shares of our common stock may be acquired in the open market over the two years following such authorization at our discretion. In periods prior to the second fiscal quarter of 2010 we purchased an aggregate 106,957 shares of our common stock. Such program has not been renewed.
| |
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities |
None.
| |
Item 5. Other Information |
None.
- 15 -
| |
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
32 | Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
- 16 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | |
Date: | | May 18, 2010 |
| | |
| | ARK RESTAURANTS CORP. |
| | | |
By: | | /s/ Michael Weinstein | |
| |
| |
| | Michael Weinstein Chairman & Chief Executive Officer |
| | | |
By: | | /s/ Robert J. Stewart | |
| |
| |
| | Robert J. Stewart Chief Financial Officer (Authorized Signatory and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
- 17 -