UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
FORM N-CSR |
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
Investment Company Act file number 811- 6490
Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) |
c/o The Dreyfus Corporation | ||
200 Park Avenue | ||
New York, New York 10166 | ||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Michael A. Rosenberg, Esq. |
200 Park Avenue |
New York, New York 10166 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (212) 922-6000 | |||
Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 | |||
Date of reporting period: | 12/31/08 |
The following N-CSR relates only to the Registrant’s series listed below and does not affect the other series of the Registrant, which has a different fiscal year end and, therefore, different N-CSR reporting requirements. A separate N-CSR Form will be filed for this series, as appropriate.
DREYFUS PREMIER INVESTMENT FUNDS, INC. | ||
- | Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund | |
- | Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund | |
- | Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund | |
- | Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund | |
- | Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund |
FORM N-CSR |
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured Not Bank-Guaranteed May Lose Value
Contents | ||
THE FUND | ||
2 | A Letter from the CEO | |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance | |
6 | Fund Performance | |
8 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses | |
8 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses | |
With Those of Other Funds | ||
9 | Statement of Investments | |
12 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities | |
13 | Statement of Operations | |
14 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets | |
16 | Financial Highlights | |
18 | Notes to Financial Statements | |
28 | Report of Independent Registered | |
Public Accounting Firm | ||
29 | Important Tax Information | |
30 | Information About the Review and Approval | |
of the Fund’s Management Agreement | ||
34 | Board Members Information | |
37 | Officers of the Fund | |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | ||
Back Cover |
The Fund |
Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund |
A LETTER FROM THE CEO Dear Shareholder: |
We present to you this annual report for Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund, covering the 12-month period from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008.
2008 was the most difficult year in decades for the financial markets. A credit crunch that began in 2007 exploded in mid-2008 into a global financial crisis, resulting in the failures of major financial institutions, a deep and prolonged recession and lower investment values across a broad range of asset classes. Governments and regulators throughout the world moved aggressively to curtail the damage, implementing unprecedented reductions of short-term interest rates, massive injections of liquidity into the banking system, government bailouts of struggling companies and plans for massive economic stimulus programs. U.S. government securities generally fared well in the ensuing “flight to quality,” but riskier bond market sectors suffered sharp price declines.
Although we expect the U.S. and global economies to remain weak until longstanding imbalances have worked their way out of the system, the financial markets currently appear to have priced in investors’ generally low expectations. In previous recessions, however, the markets have tended to anticipate economic improvement before it occurs, potentially leading to major rallies when few expected them. That’s why it makes sense to remain disciplined, maintain a long-term perspective and adopt a consistent asset allocation strategy that reflects one’s future goals and attitudes toward risk. As always, we urge you to consult with your financial advisor, who can recommend the course of action that is right for you.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the fund’s Portfolio Managers.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum Chief Executive Officer The Dreyfus Corporation |
2 |
January 15, 2009 |
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008, as provided by Laurie Carroll and Theodore Bair, Jr., Portfolio Managers
Notice to Shareholders: On September 12, 2008, BNY Hamilton Enhanced Income Fund (the “predecessor fund”) completed a tax-free reorganization into the fund, and performance for the fund’s Institutional and Investor shares for periods prior to September 12, 2008, reflects the performance of the predecessor fund’s Institutional and Class A shares, respectively.
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008, Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund’s Institutional shares achieved a total return of –8.69% and the fund’s Investor shares achieved a total return of –9.49% .1 In comparison, the Merrill Lynch U.S. Dollar LIBOR 3-Month Constant Maturity Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of 3.83% .2 At the start of 2008, the fund was overweight in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. However, as liquidity concerns grew, the returns on these issues significantly lagged those of Treasuries as the year progressed. While we attempted to reduce our exposure during the second half of the year, increased investor demand for Treasuries and the diminished capacity for demand of asset-backed securities hampered our efforts to reduce the fund’s exposure to these assets.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks a high level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity.To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in fixed-income securities of U.S. and foreign issuers rated investment grade or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus.
These may include securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. government or its agencies or instrumentalities (including securities that are neither insured or guaranteed by the U.S. government), debt securities and securities with debt-like characteristics issued by domestic and foreign private issuers (including corporations, partnerships, trusts or similar entities), foreign governments and their subdivisions, agencies and sponsored enterprises and supranational entities, municipal securities, convertible securities, preferred stock, guaranteed investment contracts, asset-based securities, and mortgage-related securities.
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued) |
The fund seeks to provide a high degree of share price stability.To help manage share price volatility and preserve shareholders’ capital, we attempt to keep the fund’s average effective duration, under normal market conditions, between three and 13 months. However, we may adjust the fund’s holdings based on actual or anticipated changes in interest rates or credit quality, and may shorten the fund’s duration below three months based on our interest rate outlook or adverse market conditions. Of course, the fund is not a money-market fund and does not seek to maintain a stable $1 price per share.
Contending with Challenging Conditions
To describe the past year in the financial markets as eventful would be an understatement.The first half of 2008 was, for the most part, a frustrating period in the financial markets, marked by a sweeping liquidity crisis. Investors became increasingly wary of any risk, and staged a massive flight to quality in which Treasuries outperformed virtually every other bond sector.The Federal Reserve engaged in an aggressive series of interest-rate cuts and initiated other measures to shore up liquidity and restore confidence to the marketplace.
In the second half of the year, the breakdown of the financial system accelerated. The year’s third quarter was largely defined by a shocking series of events in September. In the span of just a few weeks, we saw the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the U.S. government, the bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers, Bank of America’s hastily arranged purchase of Merrill Lynch, the government bailout of global insurer AIG, the seizure of Washington Mutual by federal regulators, and the contemplation of a sweeping bailout plan to stabilize the markets. In this environment, already-tight credit became even more constrained. Banks were not only wary of lending to consumers and corporations; they even became reluctant to lend to one another, as it became difficult to assess which institutions might fail next.The predictable result of these unexpected developments was another, even greater flight to quality. Investors shunned virtually every other type of asset in favor ofTreasuries, even as the Federal Reserve slashed short-term rate targets to near-zero.
The Lehman Collapse Was Widespread and Significant
The Lehman bankruptcy on its own sparked a deep crisis of confidence. Lehman’s role as counterparty to many transactions, and the exposure of many money market funds to Lehman assets, heightened the impact of the institution’s failure.
In this environment, the market’s preference for Treasuries was so overpowering that the yield on three-month Treasuries approached zero. Treasury yields across the yield spectrum also dropped dramatically, while
4
yields on comparable-maturity securities, such as commercial paper, corporate securities, and asset-backed securities, rose in accordance with the extreme selling pressure they came under.
Our Approach to a Difficult Market
Our efforts to improve the fund’s diversification and reduce its mortgage-backed and asset-backed exposure have left the fund better-positioned than it was a year ago, even if market conditions did not allow us to make all the changes we wanted.When we were able to diversify earlier in the year, we moved the fund into short-term industrial credits, which were less volatile and also offered a yield advantage over Treasury securities. As the economic news worsened late in the year, we reduced our positions in short-term industrial credits and also utility-related securities. At that point, we added money market instruments such as commercial paper and U.S. agency-related securities. We also shortened the fund’s duration, or sensitivity to interest-rate shifts, over the reporting period. The fund’s duration now ranges between 120 and 140 days.
Our Outlook
We anticipate that we could see more of the volatility we saw in the past year, and believe investors are likely to maintain their very risk-averse stance.
The push is already on for the new Presidential administration and Congress to provide a major stimulus package, which should be able to gain acceptance by including some assistance for troubled homeowners. The government will probably also be called upon to take more steps to help restore market liquidity, which remains problematic.Those efforts will only be able to achieve maximum effectiveness, however, if banks become more willing to lend.
January 15, 2009
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and, for the fund’s Investor shares for periods prior to September 12, 2008, do not take into consideration the maximum initial sales charge imposed on the predecessor fund’s Class A shares. Had these charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
Share price, yield and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an agreement in effect through September 30, 2010, for the fund’s Institutional shares, and September 30, 2009, for the fund’s Investor shares, at which time they may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. | |
2 | SOURCE: BLOOMBERG — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital gain distributions.The Merrill Lynch U.S. Dollar LIBOR 3-Month Constant Maturity Index is an unmanaged index that measures current interest rates on 3-month constant maturity dollar- denominated deposits.The index does not reflect fees and expenses to which the fund is subject. |
The Fund 5
FUND PERFORMANCE |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 12/31/08 | ||||||||
Inception | From | |||||||
Date | 1 Year | 5 Years | Inception | |||||
Investor shares | 5/07/02 | (9.49)% | (0.22)% | 0.28% | ||||
Institutional shares | 5/01/02 | (8.69)% | 0.05% | 0.56% |
† Source: Lipper Inc. Source: Bloomberg L.P.
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.The fund’s performance shown in the graph and table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
The above graph compares a $10,000 investment made in Investor shares and Institutional shares of Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund on 5/1/02 (inception date for Institutional shares) and 5/7/02 (inception date for Investor shares) to a $10,000 investment made in the Barclays Capital 9-12 Month Treasury Note Index (the “Barclays Capital Index”) and the Merrill Lynch U.S. Dollar LIBOR 3-Month Constant Maturity Index (the “Merrill Lynch Index”) on that date. All dividends and capital gain distributions are reinvested.
6
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, substantially all of the assets of another investment company advised by an affiliate of the fund’s investment adviser, BNY Hamilton Enhanced Income Fund (the “predecessor fund”), a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, Inc., were transferred to Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund in a tax-free reorganization.The predecessor fund has the same investment objective, policies, guidelines and restrictions as Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund. The performance figures for the fund’s Investor shares represent the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A shares prior to the commencement of operations for Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund and the performance of Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund’s Investor shares thereafter.The performance figures for the fund’s Institutional shares represent the performance of the predecessor fund’s Institutional shares prior to the commencement of operations for Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund and the performance of the Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund’s Institutional shares thereafter.
The fund’s performance shown in the line graph takes into account all applicable fees and expenses.The Barclays Capital Index is an unmanaged index designed to measure the performance of U.S.Treasury notes and bonds with remaining maturities of from nine up to but not including twelve months.The Merrill Lynch Index is an unmanaged index that measures current interest rates on 3-month constant maturity dollar-denominated deposits. Unlike a mutual fund, both indices are not subject to charges, fees and other expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. Further information relating to fund performance, including expense reimbursements, if applicable, is contained in the Financial Highlights section of the prospectus and elsewhere in this report.
The Fund 7
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming actual returns for the six months ended December 31, 2008
Institutional | Investor | |||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 3.30 | $ 6.90 | ||
Ending value (after expenses) | $962.10 | $959.90 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended December 31, 2008
Institutional | Investor | |||
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ 3.40 | $ 7.10 | ||
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,021.77 | $1,018.10 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .67% for Institutional Shares and 1.40% for |
Investor shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the |
one-half year period). |
8
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS | ||||||||||
December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||
Coupon | Maturity | Principal | ||||||||
Bonds and Notes—52.8% | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||||
Asset-Backed Ctfs./ | ||||||||||
Auto Receivables—.9% | ||||||||||
Capital Auto Receivables Asset | ||||||||||
Trust, Ser. 2007-3, Cl. A2A | 5.11 | 11/16/09 | 40,449 | 40,413 | ||||||
WFS Financial Owner Trust, | ||||||||||
Ser. 2005-2, Cl. A4 | 4.39 | 11/19/12 | 34,977 | 34,883 | ||||||
75,296 | ||||||||||
Asset-Backed Ctfs./ | ||||||||||
Home Equity Loans—3.1% | ||||||||||
Securitized Asset Backed | ||||||||||
Receivables, Ser. 2006-WM4, | ||||||||||
Cl. A2C | 0.63 | 11/25/36 | 1,000,000 | a | 273,224 | |||||
Banks—4.0% | ||||||||||
US Bancorp, | ||||||||||
Sr. Unscd. Notes | 3.11 | 5/6/10 | 355,000 | a | 348,073 | |||||
Electric—Integrated—1.7% | ||||||||||
Public Service Electricity & Gas, | ||||||||||
First Mortgage Bonds | 2.97 | 3/12/10 | 150,000 | a | 148,339 | |||||
Health Care—.9% | ||||||||||
Abbott Laboratories, | ||||||||||
Sr. Unscd. Notes | 5.60 | 5/15/11 | 70,000 | 73,950 | ||||||
Residential Mortgage | ||||||||||
Pass-Through Ctfs.—6.1% | ||||||||||
Indymac Index Mortgage Loan Trust, | ||||||||||
Ser. 2006-AR35, Cl. 2A2 | 0.57 | 1/25/37 | 193,205 | a | 182,730 | |||||
Structured Adjustable Rate | ||||||||||
Mortgage Loan Trust, | ||||||||||
Ser. 2005-23, Cl. 1A1 | 5.45 | 1/25/36 | 820,627 | a | 347,536 | |||||
530,266 | ||||||||||
U.S. Government Agencies—2.6% | ||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., | ||||||||||
Notes | 5.63 | 3/15/11 | 210,000 | b | 228,997 |
The Fund 9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Principal | ||||
Bonds and Notes (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||
U.S. Government Agencies/ | ||||
Mortgage-Backed—33.5% | ||||
Government National Mortgage Association I: | ||||
Ser. 2007-20, Cl. FA, 0.81%, 4/20/37 | 1,685,959 a | 1,648,726 | ||
Ser. 2006-58, Cl. FL, 1.24%, 10/16/36 | 1,312,571 a | 1,275,710 | ||
2,924,436 | ||||
Total Bonds and Notes | ||||
(cost $5,883,821) | 4,602,581 | |||
Short-Term Investments—37.2% | ||||
Commercial Paper—13.7% | ||||
Barclays US Funding | ||||
3.07%, 2/13/09 | 500,000 | 498,166 | ||
ING US Funding | ||||
2.06%, 3/4/09 | 200,000 | 199,290 | ||
Monta Blanc Capital | ||||
1.80%, 1/22/09 | 100,000 | 99,895 | ||
Praxair | ||||
0.40%, 2/17/09 | 250,000 | 249,869 | ||
Royal Bank of Scotland | ||||
1.30%, 1/8/09 | 150,000 | 149,962 | ||
1,197,182 | ||||
U.S. Government Agencies—23.5% | ||||
Federal Home Loan Banks, Discount | ||||
Notes, 3.15%, 1/28/09 | 880,000 | 878,231 | ||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., | ||||
Discount Notes, 1.25%, 6/25/09 | 450,000 b | 447,266 | ||
Federal National Mortgage | ||||
Association, Discount Notes, 1.24%, 7/1/09 | 450,000 b | 449,156 | ||
Federal Natonal Mortgage | ||||
Association, Discount Notes, 1.15%, 12/1/09 | 280,000 b | 277,013 | ||
2,051,666 | ||||
Total Short-Term Investments | ||||
(cost $3,246,864) | 3,248,848 |
10
Other Investment—12.4% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||||
(cost $1,083,000) | 1,083,000 c | 1,083,000 | ||
Total Investments (cost $10,213,685) | 102.4% | 8,934,429 | ||
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (2.4%) | (210,947) | ||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 8,723,482 |
a | Variable rate security—interest rate subject to periodic change. |
b | On September 7, 2008, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) placed Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation into conservatorship with FHFA as the conservator. As such, the FHFA will oversee the continuing affairs of these companies. |
c | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | ||||||
Value (%) | Value (%) | |||||
Short-Term/ | Asset/Mortgage-Backed | 10.1 | ||||
Money Market Investments | 49.6 | Corporate Bonds | 6.6 | |||
U.S. Government & Agencies | 36.1 | 102.4 | ||||
† Based on net assets. | ||||||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 11
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2008
Cost | Value | |||
Assets ($): | ||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments: | ||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 9,130,685 | 7,851,429 | ||
Affiliated issuers | 1,083,000 | 1,083,000 | ||
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | 58,241 | |||
Dividends and interest receivable | 11,619 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 9,150 | |||
Due from The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 1,404 | |||
9,014,843 | ||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | 308 | |||
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | 233,439 | |||
Accrued expenses | 57,614 | |||
291,361 | ||||
Net Assets ($) | 8,723,482 | |||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||
Paid-in capital | 18,270,785 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (8,268,039) | |||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | (1,279,264) | |||
Net Assets ($) | 8,723,482 | |||
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||
Institutional Shares | Investor Shares | |||
Net Assets ($) | 8,697,162 | 26,320 | ||
Shares Outstanding | 5,213,445 | 15,767 | ||
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.67 | 1.67 | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2008 | ||
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Interest | 850,473 | |
Cash dividends; | ||
Affiliated issuers | 10,516 | |
Total Income | 860,989 | |
Expenses: | ||
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 24,105 | |
Administration fee—Note 3(a) | 12,889 | |
Auditing fees | 30,154 | |
Registration fees | 29,815 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 24,475 | |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 14,799 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 7,175 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 4,471 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 2,823 | |
Miscellaneous | 20,535 | |
Total Expenses | 171,241 | |
Less—expense reimbursement due to undertakings—Note 3(a) | (95,591) | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 1(b) | (36) | |
Net Expenses | 75,614 | |
Investment Income—Net | 785,375 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (2,434,358) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (479,951) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | (2,914,309) | |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (2,128,934) | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 13
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b,c | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 785,375 | 4,083,651 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (2,434,358) | (1,379,497) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | (479,951) | (767,647) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | (2,128,934) | 1,936,507 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Institutional Shares | (804,662) | (3,950,560) | ||
Investor Shares | (43,561) | (143,594) | ||
Class C Shares | — | (20) | ||
Total Dividends | (848,223) | (4,094,174) | ||
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Institutional Shares | 14,845,975 | 63,360,069 | ||
Investor Shares | 34,806 | 724,628 | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Institutional Shares | 516,643 | 2,007,961 | ||
Investor Shares | 37,400 | 143,594 | ||
Class C Shares | — | 20 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Institutional Shares | (40,946,772) | (91,711,116) | ||
Investor Shares | (1,739,439) | (1,786,114) | ||
Class C Shares | — | (21,046) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
from Capital Stock Transactions | (27,251,387) | (27,282,004) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (30,228,544) | (29,439,671) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 38,952,026 | 68,391,697 | ||
End of Period | 8,723,482 | 38,952,026 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | — | 56,290 |
14
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b,c | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Institutional Shares | ||||
Shares sold | 8,200,191 | 32,042,477 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 288,194 | 1,019,157 | ||
Shares redeemed | (22,756,542) | (46,616,628) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (14,268,157) | (13,554,994) | ||
Investor Shares | ||||
Shares sold | 21,497 | 365,982 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 20,637 | 73,165 | ||
Shares redeemed | (1,001,452) | (907,202) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (959,318) | (468,055) | ||
Class C Shares | ||||
Shares sold | — | — | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | — | 13 | ||
Shares redeemed | — | (10,629) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | — | (10,616) |
a | The fund commenced offering two classes of shares on the close of business September 12, 2008.The existing shares were redesignated. |
b | Represents information for the the funds’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Enhanced Income Fund through September 12, 2008. |
c | Prior to January 1, 2007, Class C share accounts had been closed. On January 3, 2007, residual Class C shares remaining were redeemed. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 15
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund’s Institutional and Investor shares represents the financial highlights of the Institutional and Class A shares, respectively, of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Enhanced Income Fund (“Enhanced Income Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Institutional and Investor shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Enhanced Income Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Institutional and Investor shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization. Total return shows how much an investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased), assuming all dividends and distributions were reinvested. These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Institutional Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 1.90 | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.98 | 2.00 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—neta | .07 | .10 | .09 | .05 | .03 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (.23) | (.08) | — | .01 | (.02) | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | (.16) | .02 | .09 | .06 | .01 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.07) | (.10) | (.09) | (.06) | (.03) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 1.67 | 1.90 | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.98 | |||||
Total Return (%) | (8.69) | 1.09 | 4.77 | 2.88 | .76 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .80 | .33 | .34 | .29 | .27 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .33 | .25 | .25 | .25 | .25 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 3.63 | 5.24 | 4.67 | 2.90 | 1.51 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 72 | 104 | 126 | 51 | 105 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 8,697 | 37,092 | 65,511 | 87,151 | 324,670 |
- Represents information for Institutional Shares of the fund’s predecessor, Enhanced Income Fund through September 12, 2008.
a Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. See notes to financial statements. |
16
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Investor Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 1.91 | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.99 | 2.00 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—neta | .06 | .10 | .09 | .05 | .03 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (.24) | (.07) | — | (.01) | (.01) | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | (.18) | .03 | .09 | .04 | .02 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.06) | (.10) | (.09) | (.05) | (.03) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 1.67 | 1.91 | 1.98 | 1.98 | 1.99 | |||||
Total Return (%)b | (9.49) | 1.36 | 4.50 | 2.10 | 1.02 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .62 | .58 | .59 | .54 | .52 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .59 | .50 | .50 | .50 | .50 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 3.32 | 4.97 | 4.43 | 2.92 | 1.30 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 72 | 104 | 126 | 51 | 105 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 26 | 1,860 | 2,860 | 2,473 | 7,966 |
† Represents information for Class A Shares of the fund’s predecessor, Enhanced Income Fund through |
September 12, 2008. |
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Exclusive of sales charge. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 17
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering nine series, including the fund.The fund commenced operations on September 13, 2008. The fund’s investment objective is high current income with preservation of capital and maintenance of liquidity. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by the fund’s Board of Directors, all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of BNY Hamilton Enhanced Income Fund (“Enhanced Income Fund”), a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, were transferred to the fund in exchange for corresponding class of shares of Common Stock of the fund of equal value. Shareholders of Institutional shares and Class A of Enhanced Income Fund received Institutional shares and Investor shares of the fund, respectively, in each case in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in Enhanced Income Fund at the time of the exchange. The net asset value of the fund’s shares on the close of business September 12, 2008, after the reorganization was $1.74 for Institutional shares and $1.75 for Investor shares, and a total of 7,358,435 Institutional shares and 787,846 Investor shares, representing net assets of $14,198,125 (including $787,393 net unrealized depreciation on investments) were issued to shareholders of Hamilton Enhanced Income Fund shareholders in the exchange.The exchange was a tax-free event to shareholders. Enhanced Income Fund is the accounting survivor and its historical performance is presented for periods through September 12, 2008.
18
Effective July 1, 2008, BNY Mellon reorganized and consolidated a number of its banking and trust company subsidiaries.As a result of the reorganization, any services previously provided to the fund by Mellon Bank, N.A. or Mellon Trust of New England, N.A. are now provided by The Bank of NewYork Mellon (formerly,The Bank of NewYork).
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the funds’ shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.The fund is authorized to issue 50 million shares of $.001 Common Stock in each of the following classes of shares: Institutional and Investor. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
As of December 31, 2008, MBC Investments Corp., an indirect subsidiary of BNY Mellon, held 5,714 Investor shares of the fund.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations: expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
The Fund 19
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities excluding short-term investments (other than U.S. Treasury Bills), are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the “Service”) approved by the Board of Directors. Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are valued as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. Restricted securities, as well as securities or other assets for which recent market quotations are not readily available, that are not valued by a pricing service approved by the Board of Directors, or are determined by the fund not to reflect accurately fair value, are valued at fair value as determined in good faith under the direction of the Board of Directors.The factors that may be considered when fair valuing a security include fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Short-term investments, excluding U.S.Treasury Bills, are carried at amortized cost, which approximates value. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value. Financial futures and options, which are traded on an exchange, are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such securities are primarily traded or at the last sales price on the national securities market on each business day. Options traded over-the-counter are priced at the mean between the bid and the asked price.
The fund adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “FairValue Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes an author-
20
itative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to FAS 157.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the fund’s investments carried at fair value:
Investments in | Other Financial | |||
Valuation Inputs | Securities ($) | Instruments ($)† | ||
Level 1—Quoted Prices | 1,083,000 | 0 | ||
Level 2—Other Significant | ||||
Observable Inputs | 7,851,429 | 0 | ||
Level 3—Significant | ||||
Unobservable Inputs | 0 | 0 | ||
Total | 8,934,429 | 0 |
† | Other financial instruments include derivative instruments such as futures, forward currency | |
exchange contracts and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation | ||
(depreciation) on the instrument and written options contracts which are shown at value. |
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
The Fund 21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management banks whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by the Manager are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
(d) Concentration of risk: The fund invests primarily in debt securities. Failure of an issuer of the debt securities to make timely interest or principal payments, or a decline or the perception of a decline in the credit quality of a debt security, can cause the debt security’s price to fall, potentially lowering the fund’s share price. High yield (“junk”) bonds involve greater credit risk, including the risk of default, than investment grade bonds, and are considered predominantly speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to make principal and interest payments. In addition, the value of debt securities may decline due to general market conditions that are not specifically related to a particular company, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, changes in outlook for corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates or adverse investor sentiment. They may also decline because of factors that affect a particular industry.
(e) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains.
(f) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable pro-
22
visions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund did not have any liabilities for any unrecognized tax positions. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the four-year period ended December 31, 2008 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
At December 31, 2008, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows: accumulated capital losses $8,267,615 and unrealized depreciation $1,279,688.
The accumulated capital loss carryover is available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to December 31, 2008. If not applied $205,618 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2011, $1,689,718 expires in fiscal 2012, $2,085,448 expires in fiscal 2013, $482,656 expires in fiscal 2014, $45,761 expires in fiscal 2015 and $3,758,414 expires in fiscal 2016.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows: ordinary income $848,223 and $4,094,174, respectively.
During the period ended December 31, 2008, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to the tax treatment for amortization of premiums and paydown gains and losses, the fund increased accumulated undistributed investment income-net by $6,558, increased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments by $3,795 and decreased paid in capital by $10,353. Net assets and net asset value per share were not affected by this reclassification.
The Fund 23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
NOTE 2—Bank Line of Credit:
Effective October 15, 2008, the fund participates with other Dreyfus managed funds in a $145 million redemption credit facility (the “Facility”) to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund did not borrow under the Facility.
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a Management Agreement (“Agreement”) with the Manager, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .17% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. Prior to September 12, 2008,The Bank of NewYork (the “Advisor”) was the advisor for Enhanced Income Fund.The Advisor's fee was based on the value of Enhanced Income Fund’s average daily net assets and was computed at the following annual rates .10% of the first $2 billion, .095% of the next $3 billion, .09% of the next $5 billion and .085% in excess of $10 billion. The fee was payable monthly. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor and Manager earned $18,413 and $5,692, respectively.
Dreyfus has contractually agreed, through September 30, 2010, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of the Institutional shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .37%.
Dreyfus has agreed from September 24, 2008 through May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of the Investor shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses and shareholder services fees) do not exceed .65%.
24
The expense reimbursement, pursuant to the undertakings, amounted to $95,591 during the period ended December 31, 2008.
The Bank of New York Mellon served as Administrator to Enhanced Income Fund pursuant to an Administration Agreement. The Administrator received from Enhanced Income Fund a monthly fee equal to an annual rate of .07% of the average daily net assets of Enhanced Income Fund.The administration fee amounted to $12,889 for the period ended September 12, 2008.This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, due to the reorganization.
(b) Under the prior Distribution Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class A shares paid BNY Hamilton Distributors Inc. for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .25% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class A. During the period January 1, 2008 through September 12, 2008, Class A shares were charged $2,823.This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Investor shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended December 31, 2008, Investor shares were charged $114, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the
The Fund 25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
fund. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $4,775 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $36 pursuant to the cash management agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $7,175 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $1,197 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due fromThe Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: an expense reimbursement of $11,162, which is offset by management fees $1,330, shareholder services plan fees $5, custodian fees $2,819, chief compliance officer fees $1,197 and transfer agency per account fees $4,407.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales (including paydowns) of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended December 31, 2008, amounted to $11,036,126 and $38,049,242, respectively.
26
At December 31, 2008, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $10,214,117; accordingly, accumulated net unrealized depreciation on investments was $1,279,688, consisting of $12,726 gross unrealized appreciation and $1,292,414 gross unrealized depreciation.
In March 2008, the FASB released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements.The application of FAS 161 is required for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements and the accompanying notes has not yet been determined.
The Fund 27
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund |
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the statement of investments, of Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund (one of the series comprising Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc.) as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets for the year then ended and financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31,2004.These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The statement of changes in net assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the financial highlights for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were audited by other auditors whose report dated February 28, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on such statement of changes in net assets and financial highlights.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2008 by correspondence with the custodian and others. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above and audited by us present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Enhanced Income Fund at December 31, 2008, the results of its operations and the changes in its net assets for the year then ended and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
28
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
For federal tax purposes the fund hereby designates 100% of ordinary income dividends paid during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as qualifying “interest related dividends”.
The Fund 29
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
At the March 18, 2008, Board meeting, the Board members established the Fund as a separate series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), and authorized the Company, on behalf of the Fund, to enter into an agreement and plan of reorganization to acquire all of the assets and liabilities of BNY Hamilton Enhanced Income Fund (the “BNY Fund”) in a tax-free reorganization in exchange for shares of the Fund and the assumption by the Fund of the BNY Fund’s stated liabilities. The Fund was established solely for the purpose of effecting the BNY Fund’s reorganization and, as a result, the Fund adopted the same or substantially similar investment objective and policies as the BNY Fund and expected to inherit the performance and financial records of the BNY Fund.
At the meeting, the Board considered the approval of, with respect to the Fund, the management agreement, between the Company and Dreyfus (the “Agreement”) through July 30, 2010.The Board members who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the Act) of the Company were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus.
Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services To Be Provided to the Fund. The Board members received a presentation from representatives of Dreyfus regarding services provided to the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and discussed the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided to the Fund pursuant to the Agreement. The Board members also referenced information provided and discussed at the meeting regarding the fund’s distribution of accounts, the relationships Dreyfus has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each, the diversity of distribution among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each of the funds’ distribution channels.
The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ research and portfolio management capabilities and that Dreyfus provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration
30
and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructure.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance, Management Fee, and Expense Ratio. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, the Board members were not able to review the Fund’s performance. The Board was advised, however, that the Fund was expected to inherit the BNY Fund’s performance record upon the closing of the reorganization. The Board members received a presentation from Dreyfus that described, among other matters, the BNY Fund’s average annual total returns for the various periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board discussed with the Dreyfus representatives the Fund’s investment objective and policies and portfolio management team, and noted that the team responsible for managing the BNY Fund will continue to manage the Fund.
The Board members reviewed the Fund’s proposed management fee and estimated expense ratio, and reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios of the funds in the Lipper Ultra Short Obligations Funds category, the average and median management fees of the funds in that Lipper category and management fees of a subset of those funds.
The Board also noted that Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the Fund’s Institutional and Investor shares so that the direct expenses of the Institutional and Investor shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 0.37% and 0.62%, respectively.This expense undertaking will continue in effect for the Fund’s Institutional shares for at least two years after the reorganization of the BNY Fund, and for the Fund’s Investor shares until such Investor shares received by holders of Class A shares of the BNY Fund are converted to Institutional shares of the Fund.
The Fund 31
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the fees paid to Dreyfus or its affiliates by mutual funds and/or separate accounts managed by Dreyfus with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the Fund (the “Similar Accounts”), and explained the nature of the Similar Accounts and the differences, from Dreyfus’ perspective, in providing services to the Similar Accounts as compared to the Fund.The Dreyfus representatives also reviewed the costs associated with distribution through intermediaries. The Board analyzed differences in fees paid to Dreyfus and its affiliates by the Similar Accounts and discussed the relationship of the advisory fee to be paid in light of the services to be provided by Dreyfus.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Accounts managed by Dreyfus, to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the Fund’s management fees. The Board acknowledged that differences in fees paid by the Similar Accounts seemed to be consistent with the services to be provided.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, Dreyfus’ representatives were not able to review the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus. The Board members were presented with a schedule of the estimated profitability of the Fund prepared by Dreyfus. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the unlikelihood of soft dollar arrangements in the future with respect to trading the Fund’s portfolio. The Board also considered whether the Fund would be able to participate in any economies of scale that Dreyfus may experience in the event that the Fund attracts a large amount of assets.The Board members noted the uncertainty of the estimated asset levels, and discussed the renewal requirements for advisory agreements and their ability to review the management fee annually after an initial term of the Agreement.
32
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to approving the Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board made the following conclusions and determinations.
- The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the ser- vices to be provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
- The Board concluded that the fee to be paid by the Fund to Dreyfus was reasonable, in light of the services to be provided, comparative expense and advisory fee information, and benefits anticipated to be derived by Dreyfus from its relationship with the Fund.
- The Board determined that because the Fund had not commenced investment operations, economies of scale were not a factor and that, to the extent in the future it were to be determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the Fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the Fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that approval of the Agreement was in the best interests of the Fund.
The Fund 33
NOTES
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured Not Bank-Guaranteed May Lose Value
Contents | ||
THE FUND | ||
2 | A Letter from the CEO | |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance | |
6 | Fund Performance | |
8 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses | |
8 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses | |
With Those of Other Funds | ||
9 | Statement of Investments | |
13 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities | |
14 | Statement of Operations | |
15 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets | |
17 | Financial Highlights | |
21 | Notes to Financial Statements | |
33 | Report of Independent Registered | |
Public Accounting Firm | ||
34 | Important Tax Information | |
35 | Information About the Review and Approval | |
of the Fund’s Management Agreement | ||
39 | Board Members Information | |
42 | Officers of the Fund | |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | ||
Back Cover |
The Fund
Dreyfus |
Global Real Estate |
Securities Fund |
A LETTER FROM THE CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We present to you this annual report for Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund, covering the 12-month period from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008.
2008 was the most difficult year in decades for the world’s financial markets. A credit crunch that began in 2007 in the U.S. sub-prime mortgage market exploded in mid-2008 into a global financial crisis, resulting in the failures of major financial institutions, a deep and prolonged recession and lower investment values across a broad range of asset classes. Governments and regulators throughout the world moved aggressively to curtail the damage, implementing unprecedented reductions of short-term interest rates, massive injections of liquidity into the banking system, government bailouts of struggling companies and plans for massive economic stimulus programs. After several years of strong relative returns, international stocks generally declined more sharply than their U.S. counterparts.
Although we expect the U.S. and global economies to remain weak until longstanding imbalances have worked their way out of the system, the financial markets currently appear to have priced in investors’ generally low expectations. In previous recessions, however, the markets have tended to anticipate economic improvement before it occurs, potentially leading to major rallies when few expected them. That’s why it makes sense to remain disciplined, maintain a long-term perspective and adopt a consistent asset allocation strategy that reflects one’s future goals and attitudes toward risk. As always, we urge you to consult with your financial advisor, who can recommend the course of action that is right for you.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the fund’s Portfolio Managers.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum Chief Executive Officer The Dreyfus Corporation January 15, 2009 |
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008, as provided by Peter Zabierek, Dean Frankel and Todd Briddell, Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008, Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund’s Class A shares achieved a total return of –43.60% and Class I shares returned –43.38% ..1 In comparison, the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Real Estate Securities Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of –47.72% for the same period.2 For the period of September 13, 2008, through December 31, 2008, Class C shares returned –34.92%, and Class T shares returned –34.94% .1 In comparison, for that period, the Index returned –38.20% .2 The fund’s outperformance of the Index is attributable to our conservative positioning of the portfolio in a very volatile period for real estate, and our individual security selection in keeping with that positioning.Although we can’t say we predicted the full depth of the industry’s troubles, in 2007 we saw what we considered to be clear signs of more difficult conditions ahead. This led us to move away from more speculative names with large development pipelines and highly-levered private funds, and toward more conservative positions in well-managed companies.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to maximize total return consisting of capital appreciation and current income. To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in publicly traded equity securities of companies principally engaged in the real estate sector. The fund’s equity investments may include common stocks, preferred stocks, convertible securities, warrants, equity interests in foreign investment funds or trusts, depositary receipts and other equity investments. Under normal conditions, the fund expects to invest at least 40% of its assets in companies whose principal place of business is located outside the United States, and will invest in at least 10 different countries (including the United States). Although the fund invests primarily in developed markets, it also may invest in equity securities of companies located in emerging markets, and may invest in equity securities of companies of any market capitalization, including smaller companies.
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued) |
In selecting investments for the fund’s portfolio, we use a proprietary approach to quantify investment opportunity both from a real estate and stock perspective. We combine a bottom-up real estate research with a Relative Value Model that includes regular and direct contact with the companies in the fund’s investable universe. These research efforts are supported by extensive sell side and independent research.
Economic Difficulties Were Far-Reaching
The dark cloud that followed the global real estate market in 2008 was the same one that followed every market — and that was the global credit crunch.There were very few corners of the world that were able to avoid the crisis this year.The real estate markets were hit by a bit of a double whammy. First, the credit crunch created recessionary conditions around the world, and as usual, weaker economies reduced demand for residential, commercial, and industrial real estate. Second, banks’ tightening of credit sapped liquidity from the market and made it difficult to buy and to sell commercial real estate properties. So at the same time revenues were going down, it became more difficult to create value through buying and selling properties.
In this environment, we sought out reliable, income-producing securities that weren’t taking a lot of risk with building new projects. Specifically, we looked for companies that had relatively low levels of debt, access to capital, and established management teams with a record of success. This approach served us relatively well during this past year, not only because of the companies it led us to buy, but also those it led us not to buy; we were able to avoid a number of stocks in the benchmark that fell precipitously during the year.
A Variety of Positions Benefited the Fund
One of the stocks that performed well for the fund was Unibail-Redamco, a French company. Although this company posted a double-digit loss for the year, its losses were far less than the market’s. Unibail had a very large development pipeline, but was among the first to realize that development risk was mounting. Thus, while many of its competitors moved forward with development pipelines and then had trouble leasing them up, Unibail actually put a lot of its development sites on hold. Another solid performer was U.S.-based Public Storage, which was up 12%.The company has almost no debt. In addition, because many people use storage facilities during times of economic dislocation —when they may need to move unexpectedly or downsize their home, for example — demand for these facilities can actually perform well when the economy weakens.
4
The strongest-performing global market in 2008 was Switzerland, which posted a mild single-digit decline. Our overweighting in this country helped our relative performance.The country has a very strong banking system and operates outside the Eurozone, which gives it control of its own monetary policy.The commercial real estate market in Switzerland didn’t rise up as steeply as many of its peers around the world early in the decade, so it hasn’t had as far to fall during the recent contraction.
One of our weakest markets, relative to the benchmark, was Canada. In hindsight, we probably weren’t conservative enough with our positioning in this market. It’s hard to pick two bigger stories this year — the wind coming out of energy’s sails and the fall of the auto industries —and Canada has been hit hard by both of them. The economy in the western part of the country is largely tied to the price of oil, which stumbled in the year’s second half, while the economy in the eastern part of the country is exposed to the automotive industry, which of course struggled mightily throughout the year.
Our Outlook for the Year Ahead
We anticipate some difficult months to come, but we believe we are closer to the bottom than the top in terms of valuations.With this market down so steeply in 2008, we are seeing what we believe to be some compelling valuations. In various parts of the world, many stocks are trading at a 40% to 50% discount to their net asset value, with cash-flow multiples at or near all-time lows and dividend yields at or near all-time highs. In short, we see opportunity for high-quality real estate in major institutional markets.
January 15, 2009
1 | The total return figures presented for Class A and I shares of the fund reflect the performance of BNY Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund’s (the “predecessor fund”) Class A shares and Institutional shares, respectively, prior to 9/13/08. Performance for each share class includes returns for the predecessor fund (Class A and Class I only) and the current maximum sales load, and reflects current distribution and servicing fees in effect only since the reorganization date. |
Investors should consider, when deciding whether to purchase a particular class of shares, the investment amount, anticipated holding period and other relevant factors. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect for Classes A, C, and T through May 1, 2009, and in effect for Class I through September 30, 2010, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. | |
2 | SOURCE: BLOOMBERG — Reflects reinvestment of net dividends and, where applicable, capital gain distributions.The FTSE European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA) National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) Global Real Estate Securities Index is an unmanaged index designed to track the performance of listed real estate companies and REITs worldwide. |
The Fund 5
† Source: Lipper Inc.
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.
The above graph compares a $10,000 investment made in Class A and Class I shares of Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund on 12/29/06 (inception date) to a $10,000 investment made in the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Real Estate Index (the “Index”) on that date. For comparative purposes, the value of the Index on 12/31/06 is used the beginning value on 12/29/06. All dividends and capital gain distributions are reinvested.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, substantially all of the assets of another investment company advised by an affiliate of the fund’s investment adviser, BNY Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund (the “predecessor fund”), a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, Inc., were transferred to Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund in a tax-free reorganization.The predecessor fund has the same investment objective, policies, guidelines and restrictions as Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund.The performance of the fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T shares represent the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A and Institutional shares prior to the commencement of operations for Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund and the performance of Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T shares thereafter.
The fund’s performance shown in the line graph takes into account the maximum initial sales charge on Class A shares and all other applicable fees and expenses.The Index is an unmanaged market-capitalization weighted index designed to measure the performance of exchange-listed real estate companies and REITs worldwide. Unlike a mutual fund, the Index is not subject to charges, fees and other expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. Further information relating to fund performance, including expense reimbursements, if applicable, is contained in the Financial Highlights section of the prospectus and elsewhere in this report.
6
Average Annual Total Returns as of 12/31/08 | ||||||
Inception | From | |||||
Date | 1 Year | Inception | ||||
Class A shares | ||||||
with maximum sales charge (5.75%) | 12/29/06 | (46.83)% | (29.94)% | |||
without sales charge | 12/29/06 | (43.60)% | (27.85)% | |||
Class C shares | ||||||
with applicable redemption charge † | 09/13/08 | (44.16)%†† | (27.85)%†† | |||
without redemption | 09/13/08 | (43.60)%†† | (27.85)%†† | |||
Class I shares | 12/29/06 | (43.38)% | (27.64)% | |||
Class T shares | ||||||
with applicable sales charge (4.5%) | 09/13/08 | (46.18)%†† | (29.49)%†† | |||
without sales charge | 09/13/08 | (43.62)%†† | (27.86)%†† |
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.The fund’s performance shown in the graph and table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
- The maximum contingent deferred sales charge for Class C shares is 1% for shares redeemed within one year of the date of purchase.
- The total return performance figures presented for Class C and Class T shares of the fund reflect the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A and Institutional shares for periods prior to 09/13/08 (the inception date for Class C and Class T shares), adjusted to reflect the fund’s applicable sales loads for those class shares and the applicable distribution/servicing fees thereafter.
The Fund 7
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming actual returns for the six months ended December 31, 2008†
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000†† | $5.37 | $ 5.83 | $ 4.76 | $ 4.59 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $644.60 | $650.80 | $646.30 | $650.60 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended December 31, 2008
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000†††† | $ 6.60 | $ 11.89 | $ 5.84 | $ 9.37 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,018.60 | $1,013.32 | $1,019.36 | $1,015.84 |
† From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008 for Class C and Class T shares.
- Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.30% for Class A shares and 1.15% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period), and 2.35% for Class C and 1.85% for Class T, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 110/366 (to reflect the actual days in the period).
- Please note that while Class C and Class T shares commenced initial offering on September 13, 2008, the Hypothetical expenses paid during the period reflect projected activity for the full six month period for purposes of comparability.This projection assumes that annualized expense ratios were in effect during the period July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008.
- Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.30% for Class A, 2.35% for Class C, 1.15% for Class I and 1.85% for Class T, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
8
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS December 31, 2008 |
Common Stocks—96.0% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Australia—8.6% | ||||
CFS Retail Property Trust | 873,490 | 1,145,751 | ||
ING Office Fund | 382,260 | 218,622 | ||
Stockland | 99,200 | 287,031 | ||
Westfield Group | 271,090 | 2,497,745 | ||
4,149,149 | ||||
Canada—2.9% | ||||
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | 10,890 | 109,826 | ||
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust | 9,810 | 203,113 | ||
Dundee Real Estate Investment Trust | 12,610 | 128,705 | ||
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust | 84,580 | 935,895 | ||
1,377,539 | ||||
Finland—.5% | ||||
Citycon | 113,170 | 264,284 | ||
France—5.6% | ||||
Klepierre | 6,880 | 167,362 | ||
Unibail-Rodamco | 17,120 | 2,534,445 | ||
2,701,807 | ||||
Hong Kong—12.2% | ||||
Champion REIT | 477,000 | 128,484 | ||
China Overseas Land & Investment | 264,000 | 371,123 | ||
China Resources Land | 401,000 | 496,463 | ||
Hang Lung Properties | 366,000 | 802,856 | ||
Henderson Land Development | 170,000 | 635,061 | ||
Hongkong Land Holdings | 68,000 | 170,365 | ||
Link REIT | 637,500 | 1,059,709 | ||
New World Development | 256,000 | 261,540 | ||
Sun Hung Kai Properties | 238,000 | 2,001,196 | ||
5,926,797 | ||||
Japan—15.4% | ||||
Japan Real Estate Investment | 83 | 745,950 | ||
Japan Retail Fund Investment | 73 | 316,506 | ||
Mitsubishi Estate | 137,000 | 2,259,295 |
The Fund 9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Japan (continued) | ||||
Mitsui Fudosan | 142,000 | 2,359,746 | ||
Nippon Building Fund | 95 | 1,042,709 | ||
Sumitomo Realty & Development | 49,000 | 730,054 | ||
7,454,260 | ||||
Netherlands—1.9% | ||||
Corio | 12,470 | 570,112 | ||
Wereldhave | 4,110 | 359,925 | ||
930,037 | ||||
Singapore—2.6% | ||||
Ascendas Real Estate Investment Trust | 454,000 | 439,190 | ||
CapitaLand | 206,000 | 452,579 | ||
CapitaMall Trust | 305,000 | 339,589 | ||
1,231,358 | ||||
Sweden—.9% | ||||
Castellum | 54,000 | 414,836 | ||
Switzerland—1.4% | ||||
PSP Swiss Property | 13,310 | 659,029 | ||
United Kingdom—5.3% | ||||
British Land | 86,910 | 688,502 | ||
Great Portland Estates | 51,670 | 193,151 | ||
Hammerson | 60,580 | 465,980 | ||
Land Securities Group | 40,910 | 541,718 | ||
Liberty International | 41,850 | 287,612 | ||
Segro | 104,950 | 372,704 | ||
2,549,667 | ||||
United States—38.7% | ||||
Alexandria Real Estate Equities | 5,520 | 333,077 | ||
AMB Property | 11,100 | 259,962 | ||
American Tower, Cl. A | 16,840 a | 493,749 | ||
AvalonBay Communities | 10,650 | 645,177 | ||
Boston Properties | 15,960 | 877,800 |
10
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
United States (continued) | ||||
Brandywine Realty Trust | 41,620 | 320,890 | ||
BRE Properties | 19,520 | 546,170 | ||
Camden Property Trust | 8,630 | 270,464 | ||
Digital Realty Trust | 11,790 | 387,302 | ||
Equity Lifestyles Properties | 9,050 | 347,158 | ||
Equity Residential | 23,140 | 690,035 | ||
Essex Property Trust | 320 | 24,560 | ||
Federal Realty Investment Trust | 10,910 | 677,293 | ||
Healthcare Realty Trust | 21,160 | 496,837 | ||
Home Properties | 7,700 | 312,620 | ||
HRPT Properties Trust | 128,140 | 431,832 | ||
Kilroy Realty | 21,410 | 716,379 | ||
Kimco Realty | 28,560 | 522,077 | ||
Mack-Cali Realty | 20,870 | 511,315 | ||
National Retail Properties | 60,670 | 1,042,917 | ||
Nationwide Health Properties | 35,850 | 1,029,612 | ||
ProLogis | 30,150 | 418,783 | ||
Public Storage | 13,720 | 1,090,740 | ||
Regency Centers | 8,630 | 403,021 | ||
Senior Housing Properties Trust | 23,260 | 416,819 | ||
Simon Property Group | 27,750 | 1,474,357 | ||
SL Green Realty | 13,310 | 344,729 | ||
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide | 39,510 | 707,229 | ||
Taubman Centers | 23,640 | 601,874 | ||
UDR | 30,560 | 421,422 | ||
Ventas | 32,340 | 1,085,654 | ||
Vornado Realty Trust | 13,190 | 796,016 | ||
18,697,870 | ||||
Total Common Stocks | ||||
(cost $73,133,019) | 46,356,633 |
The Fund 11
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) | ||||||||
Other Investment—3.1% | Shares | Value ($) | ||||||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||||||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred Plus Money Market Fund | ||||||||
(cost $1,505,000) | 1,505,000 b | 1,505,000 | ||||||
Total Investments (cost $74,638,019) | 99.1% | 47,861,633 | ||||||
Cash and Receivables (Net) | .9% | 417,734 | ||||||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 48,279,367 | ||||||
REIT—Real Estate Investment Trust. | ||||||||
a | Non-income producing security. | |||||||
b | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. | |||||||
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | ||||||||
Value (%) | Value (%) | |||||||
Diversified REIT | 28.5 | Money Market Investment | 3.1 | |||||
Retail | 19.7 | Freestanding | 2.2 | |||||
Office | 13.1 | Real Estate Services | 2.1 | |||||
Health Care | 6.3 | Specialty | 1.8 | |||||
Self Storage | 5.9 | Industrial | 1.4 | |||||
Shopping Centers | 5.7 | Residential | .4 | |||||
Multifamily | 4.6 | |||||||
Regional Malls | 4.3 | 99.1 | ||||||
† | Based on net assets. | |||||||
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2008
Cost | Value | |||||||
Assets ($): | ||||||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments: | ||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 73,133,019 | 46,356,633 | ||||||
Affiliated issuers | 1,505,000 | 1,505,000 | ||||||
Cash denominated in foreign currencies | 1,942 | 2,000 | ||||||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 756,715 | |||||||
Dividends and interest receivable | 344,213 | |||||||
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | 70,752 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses | 22,226 | |||||||
49,057,539 | ||||||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 53,583 | |||||||
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | 407,659 | |||||||
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | 286,839 | |||||||
Interest payable—Note 2 | 42 | |||||||
Accrued expenses | 30,049 | |||||||
778,172 | ||||||||
Net Assets ($) | 48,279,367 | |||||||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||||||
Paid-in capital | 93,357,378 | |||||||
Accumulated undistributed investment income—net | 13,934 | |||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (18,316,327) | |||||||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||||||||
on investments and foreign currency transactions | (26,775,618) | |||||||
Net Assets ($) | 48,279,367 | |||||||
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Net Assets ($) | 11,844 | 6,456 | 48,254,612 | 6,455 | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 2,360 | 1,285 | 9,607,937 | 1,285 | ||||
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 5.02 | 5.02 | 5.02 | 5.02 | ||||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 13
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2008 | ||
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends (net of $173,677 foreign taxes withheld at source): | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 1,959,973 | |
Affiliated issuers | 2,111 | |
Interest | 38,802 | |
Total Income | 2,000,886 | |
Expenses: | ||
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 512,386 | |
Administration fee—Note 3(a) | 42,038 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 43,097 | |
Registration fees | 34,857 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 28,032 | |
Professional fees | 17,626 | |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 16,636 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 4,578 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 107 | |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 42 | |
Miscellaneous | 24,993 | |
Total Expenses | 724,392 | |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertakings—Note 3(a) | (30,528) | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 1(c) | (124) | |
Net Expenses | 693,740 | |
Investment Income—Net | 1,307,146 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency transactions | (16,388,531) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on forward currency exchange contracts | (44,192) | |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (16,432,723) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||
on investments and foreign currency transactions | (20,323,628) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | (36,756,351) | |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (35,449,205) | |
See notes to financial statements. |
14
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 1,307,146 | 808,255 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (16,432,723) | (1,925,134) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | (20,323,628) | (6,451,990) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | (35,449,205) | (7,568,869) | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A Shares | (426) | (894) | ||
Class C Shares | (41) | — | ||
Class I Shares | (1,032,336) | (970,821) | ||
Class T Shares | (51) | — | ||
Total Dividends | (1,032,854) | (971,175) | ||
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 17,982 | 58,506 | ||
Class C Shares | 10,000 | — | ||
Class I Shares | 111,346,944 | 73,622,329 | ||
Class T Shares | 10,000 | — | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A Shares | 371 | 886 | ||
Class I Shares | 242,508 | 241,453 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (42,657) | — | ||
Class I Shares | (78,015,421) | (14,191,441) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
from Capital Stock Transactions | 33,569,727 | 59,731,733 | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (2,912,332) | 51,191,689 | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 51,191,699 | 10 | ||
End of Period | 48,279,367 | 51,191,699 | ||
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) | ||||
investment income—net | 13,934 | (170,885) |
The Fund 15
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 2,352 | 6,088 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 50 | 95 | ||
Shares redeemed | (5,757) | (468) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (3,355) | 5,715 | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 1,285 | — | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 14,329,983 | 7,096,151 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 40,251 | 25,584 | ||
Shares redeemed | (10,418,141) | (1,465,892) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 3,952,093 | 5,655,843 | ||
Class T | ||||
Shares sold | 1,285 | — |
a | The fund commenced offering four classes of shares on the close of business September 12, 2008.The existing shares were redesignated and the fund added Class C and Class T shares. |
b | Represents information for the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund, through September 12, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund’s Class A and Class I shares represents the financial highlights of the Class A and Institutional shares, respectively, of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund (“Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Class A and Class I shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Class A and Class I shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
Class A Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 9.04 | 10.00 | 10.00 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment income—netb | .16 | .18 | — | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (4.08) | (.97) | — | |||
Total from Investment Operations | (3.92) | (.79) | — | |||
Distributions: | ||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.10) | (.17) | — | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 5.02 | 9.04 | 10.00 | |||
Total Return (%)c | (43.60) | (8.00) | — | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.62 | 1.58 | — | |||
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.41 | 1.50 | — | |||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||
to average net assets | 1.83 | 1.87 | — | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 79 | 73 | — | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 12 | 52 | —d |
- Represents information for Class A shares of the fund’s predecessor, Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund, through September 12, 2008.
a | From December 29, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Amount represents less than $1,000. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 17
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued) |
Year Ended | ||
Class C Shares | December 31, 2008a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 7.78 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—netb | .01 | |
Net realized and unrealized | ||
gain (loss) on investments | (2.74) | |
Total from Investment Operations | (2.73) | |
Distributions: | ||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.03) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 5.02 | |
Total Return (%)c | (34.92)d | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.46e | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 2.35e | |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | .67e | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 79 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 6 |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||
Class I Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006a | |||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 9.04 | 10.00 | 10.00 | |||
Investment Operations: | ||||||
Investment income—netb | .16 | .20 | — | |||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (4.06) | (.98) | — | |||
Total from Investment Operations | (3.90) | (.78) | — | |||
Distributions: | ||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.12) | (.18) | — | |||
Net asset value, end of period | 5.02 | 9.04 | 10.00 | |||
Total Return (%) | (43.38) | (7.83) | — | |||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.24 | 1.34 | — | |||
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.19 | 1.25 | — | |||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||
to average net assets | 2.24 | 1.97 | — | |||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 79 | 73 | — | |||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 48,255 | 51,140 | —c |
- Represents information for Institutional shares of the fund’s predecessor, Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund, through September 12, 2008.
a | From December 29, 2006 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2006. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount represents less than $1,000. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 19
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued) |
Year Ended | ||
Class T Shares | December 31, 2008a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 7.78 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—netb | .02 | |
Net realized and unrealized | ||
gain (loss) on investments | (2.74) | |
Total from Investment Operations | (2.72) | |
Distributions: | ||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.04) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 5.02 | |
Total Return (%)c | (34.94)d | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.96e | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.85e | |
Ratio of net investment income | ||
to average net assets | 1.18e | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 79 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 6 |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
20
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering nine series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective is long-term capital appreciation. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser. Urdang Securities Management, Inc. (“Urdang”) serves as the fund’s sub-investment advisor. Urdang is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by the fund’s Board of Directors, all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund, a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, were transferred to the fund in exchange for corresponding class of shares of Common Stock of the fund of equal value. Shareholders of Class A and Institutional shares of Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund received Class A and Class I shares of the fund, respectively, in each case in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund at the time of the exchange. On the date of the exchange, the fund created Class C and ClassT shares.The net asset value of the fund’s shares on the close of business September 12, 2008, after the reorganization was $7.78 for Class A shares and $7.78 for Class I shares, and a total of 5,755 Class A shares and 9,743,745 Class I shares, representing net assets of $75,876,874 (including $10,062,244 net unrealized depreciation on investments) were issued to shareholders of Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund shareholders in the exchange.The exchange was a tax-free event to shareholders of the fund. Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund is the accounting survivor and its historical performance is presented for periods through September 12, 2008.
The Fund 21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
At a meeting of the Board of Directors held on July 10, 2008, the Board approved, effective December 1, 2008, a proposal to change the name of the fund from “Dreyfus Premier Global Real Estate Securities Fund” to “Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund.”
Effective July 1, 2008, BNY Mellon reorganized and consolidated a number of its banking and trust company subsidiaries.As a result of the reorganization, any services previously provided to the fund by Mellon Bank, N.A. or Mellon Trust of New England, N.A. are now provided by The Bank of NewYork Mellon (formerly,The Bank of NewYork).
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, is the distributor of the fund’s shares.The fund is authorized to issue 50 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C and Class T and 100 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock of Class I. Class A and Class T shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold at net asset value per share only to institutional investors. Effective December 3, 2008, investments for new accounts were no longer permitted in Class T of the fund, except that participants in certain group retirement plans were able to open a new account in Class T of the fund, provided that the fund was established as an investment option under the plans before December 3, 2008. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
22
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restric-
The Fund 23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
tions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. Investments denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the prevailing rates of exchange. Forward currency exchange contracts are valued at the forward rate.
The fund adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “FairValue Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes an authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to FAS 157.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the fund’s investments carried at fair value:
Investments in | Other Financial | |||
Valuation Inputs | Securities ($) | Instruments ($)† | ||
Level 1—Quoted Prices | 29,100,069 | 0 | ||
Level 2—Other Significant | ||||
Observable Inputs | 18,761,564 | 0 | ||
Level 3—Significant | ||||
Unobservable Inputs | 0 | 0 | ||
Total | 47,861,633 | 0 |
- Other financial instruments include derivative instruments, such as futures, forward currency exchange contracts and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument and written options contracts which are shown at value.
24
(b) Foreign currency transactions: The fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales and maturities of short-term securities, sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized on securities transactions and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the fund's books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the value of assets and liabilities other than investments in securities, resulting from changes in exchange rates. Such gains and losses are included with net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
(c) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management banks whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
Investing in foreign markets may involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in the U.S. These risks include revaluation of currencies, high rates of inflation, repatriation restrictions on income and capital, and adverse political and economic developments. Moreover, securities issued in these markets may be less
The Fund 25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
liquid, subject to government ownership controls and delayed settlements, and their prices may be more volatile than those of comparable securities in the U.S.
(d) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by Dreyfus are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
(e) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
(f) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund did not have any liabilities for any unrecognized tax positions. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
At December 31, 2008, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows: undistributed ordinary income $175,004,
26
accumulated capital losses $9,463,089 and unrealized depreciation $30,647,353. In addition, the fund had $5,142,573 of capital losses realized after October 31, 2008, which were deferred for tax purposes to the first day of the following fiscal year.
The accumulated capital loss carryover is available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to December 31, 2008. If not applied, $561,698 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2015 and $8,901,391 expires in fiscal 2016.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows: ordinary income $1,032,854 and $971,175, respectively.
During the period ended December 31, 2008, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to the tax treatment for foreign currency gains and losses and passive foreign investment companies, the fund decreased accumulated undistributed investment income-net by $89,473, increased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments by $33,565 and increased paid-in capital by $55,908. Net assets and net asset value per share were not affected by this reclassification.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
Effective October 15, 2008, the fund participates with other Dreyfus managed funds in a $145 million redemption credit facility (the “Facility”) to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing.
The average daily amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facility during the period ended December 31, 2008, was approximately $3,000 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.39% .
The Fund 27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a Management Agreement (“Agreement”) with Dreyfus, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .95% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. Prior to September 13, 2008, The Bank of New York (the “Advisor”) was the advisor for Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund.The Advisor’s fee was computed at an annual rate of .85% of the value of Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund’s average daily net assets and was payable monthly. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor and Manager earned $357,575 and $154,811, respectively.
Dreyfus has contractually agreed, until September 30, 2010, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class I shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 1.20% .
Dreyfus has agreed, from September 24, 2008 through May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder services fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.35% .
Dreyfus has agreed, until May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class C and Class T (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder service fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.35% .
The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertakings, amounted to $30,528 during the period ended December 31, 2008.
Pursuant to a Sub-Investment Advisory Agreement between Dreyfus and Urdang, Dreyfus pays Urdang a monthly fee at an annual rate of .46% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets.
28
The Bank of New York Mellon served as Administrator to Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund pursuant to an Administration Agreement. The Administrator received from Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund a monthly fee equal to an annual rate of .10% of the value of the average daily net assets of Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund.The administration fees amounted to $42,038 for the period ended September 12, 2008.This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, due to the reorganization.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .75% and .25% of the value of their respective average daily net assets. During the period September 13, 2008 through December 31, 2008, Class C and Class T shares were charged $16 and $5, respectively, pursuant to the Plan.
Under the prior Distribution Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class A shares paid BNY Hamilton Distributors, Inc. for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .25% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class A. During the period January 1, 2008 through September 12, 2008, Class A shares were charged $86. This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of ..25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period September 13, 2008 through December 31, 2008,
The Fund 29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
Class A, Class C and Class T shares were charged $13, $5, and $5, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates DreyfusTransfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dreyfus, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period September 13, 2008 through December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $8,705 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $13 pursuant to the cash management agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $28,032 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $1,197 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $38,349, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $5, shareholder services plan fees $5, custodian fees $9,889, chief compliance officer fees $1,197 and transfer agency per account fees $4,138.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and forward currency exchange contracts, during the period ended December 31, 2008, amounted to $78,439,645 and $44,523,390, respectively.
30
The fund enters into forward currency exchange contracts in order to hedge its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on its foreign portfolio holdings and to settle foreign currency transactions. When executing forward currency exchange contracts, the fund is obligated to buy or sell a foreign currency at a specified rate on a certain date in the future. With respect to sales of forward currency exchange contracts, the fund would incur a loss if the value of the contract increases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed. The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract decreases between those dates. With respect to purchases of forward currency exchange contracts, the fund would incur a loss if the value of the contract decreases between the date the forward contract is opened and the date the forward contract is closed. The fund realizes a gain if the value of the contract increases between those dates. The fund is also exposed to credit risk associated with counterparty nonperformance on these forward currency exchange contracts which is typically limited to the unrealized gain on each open contract. At December 31, 2008, there were no open forward currency exchange contracts outstanding.
At December 31, 2008, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $78,509,754; accordingly, accumulated net unrealized depreciation on investments was $30,648,121, consisting of $162,426 gross unrealized appreciation and $30,810,547 gross unrealized depreciation.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The application of FAS 161 is required for fiscal years and interim periods
The Fund 31
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
beginning after November 15, 2008.At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements and the accompanying notes has not yet been determined.
NOTE 5—Subsequent Event:
On February 4, 2009, the fund issued to each holder of its Class T shares, in exchange for said shares, Class A shares of the fund having an aggregate net asset value equal to the aggregate net asset value of the shareholder’s Class T shares. Subsequent investments in the fund’s Class A shares made by prior holders of the fund’s Class T shares who received Class A shares of the fund in exchange for their Class T shares are subject to the front-end sales load schedule currently in effect for Class T shares. Otherwise, all other Class A share attributes will be in effect.
32
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the statement of investments, of Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund (one of the series comprising Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc.) as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets for the year then ended and financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31,2004.These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.The statement of changes in net assets for the year ended December 31,2007 and the financial highlights for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were audited by other auditors whose report dated February 28, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on such statement of changes in net assets and financial highlights.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2008 by correspondence with the custodian and others.We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above and audited by us present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Global Real Estate Securities Fund at December 31, 2008, and the results of its operations and the changes in its net assets for the year then ended, and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
New York, New York |
February 25, 2009 |
The Fund 33
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
For federal tax purposes, certain dividends paid by the fund may be subject to a maximum tax rate of 15%, as provided for by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. Of the distributions paid during the fiscal year, $99,452 represents the maximum amount that may be considered qualified dividend income. Shareholders will receive notification in January 2009 of the percentage applicable to the preparation of their 2008 income tax returns.
34
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
At the March 18, 2008, Board meeting, the Board members established the Fund as a separate series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), and authorized the Company, on behalf of the Fund, to enter into an agreement and plan of reorganization to acquire all of the assets and liabilities of BNY Hamilton Global Real Estate Securities Fund (the “BNY Fund”) in a tax-free reorganization in exchange for shares of the Fund and the assumption by the Fund of the BNY Fund’s stated liabilities.The Fund was established solely for the purpose of effecting the BNY Fund’s reorganization and, as a result, the Fund adopted the same or substantially similar investment objective and policies as the BNY Fund and expected to inherit the performance and financial records of the BNY Fund.
At the meeting, the Board considered the approval of, with respect to the Fund, the management agreement, between the Company and Dreyfus, and a sub-investment advisory agreement between Dreyfus and Urdang Securities Management, Inc. (the “Sub-Adviser”) (together, the “Agreements”) through July 30, 2010.The Board members who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the Act) of the Company were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus.
Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services To Be Provided to the Fund. The Board members received a presentation from representatives of Dreyfus regarding services provided to the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and discussed the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided to the Fund pursuant to the Agreements. The Board members also referenced information provided and discussed at the meeting regarding the funds’ distribution of accounts, the relationships Dreyfus has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each, the diversity of distribution among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each of the funds’ distribution channels.
The Fund 35
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ and the Sub-Adviser’s research and portfolio management capabilities and that Dreyfus provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructure, as well as Dreyfus’ supervisory activities over the Sub-Adviser.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance, Management Fee, and Expense Ratio. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, the Board members were not able to review the Fund’s performance. The Board was advised, however, that the Fund was expected to inherit the BNY Fund’s performance record upon the closing of the reorganization. The Board members received a presentation from Dreyfus that described, among other matters, the BNY Fund’s average annual total returns for the various periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board discussed with the Dreyfus representatives the Fund’s investment objective and policies and portfolio management team, and noted that the team responsible for managing the BNY Fund will continue to manage the Fund.
The Board members reviewed the Fund’s proposed management fee and estimated expense ratio, and reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios of the funds in the Lipper Real Estate Funds category, the average and median management fees of the funds in that Lipper category and management fees of a subset of those funds.
The Board also noted that Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the Fund’s Class I and Class A shares so that the direct expenses of the Class I and Class A shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 1.20% and 1.45%, respectively. This expense undertaking will continue in effect for the Fund’s Class I shares for at least two years after the reorganization of the BNY Fund, and for the Fund’s Class A shares until such Class A shares received by holders of Class A shares of the BNY Fund are converted to Class I shares of the Fund.
36
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the fees paid to Dreyfus or its affiliates by mutual funds and/or separate accounts managed by Dreyfus with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the Fund (the “Similar Accounts”), and explained the nature of the Similar Accounts and the differences, from Dreyfus’ and the Sub-Adviser’s perspective, as applicable, in providing services to the Similar Accounts as compared to the Fund. The Dreyfus representatives also reviewed the costs associated with distribution through intermediaries. The Board analyzed differences in fees paid to Dreyfus and its affiliates by the Similar Accounts and discussed the relationship of the advisory fee to be paid in light of the services to be provided by Dreyfus and the Sub-Adviser. The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Accounts managed by Dreyfus or the Sub-Adviser, as applicable, to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the Fund’s management fees. The Board acknowledged that differences in fees paid by the Similar Accounts seemed to be consistent with the services to be provided.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, Dreyfus’ representatives were not able to review the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus. [The Board members were presented with a schedule of the estimated profitability of the Fund prepared by Dreyfus.] The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus and the Sub-Adviser from acting as investment adviser and sub-investment adviser, respectively, and noted the unlikelihood of soft dollar arrangements in the future with respect to trading the Fund’s portfolio.The Board also considered whether the Fund would be able to participate in any economies of scale that Dreyfus may experience in the event that the Fund attracts a large amount of assets.The Board members noted the uncertainty of the estimated asset levels, and discussed the renewal requirements for advisory agreements and their ability to review the management fee annually after an initial term of the Agreements.
The Fund 37
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to approving the Agreements. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board made the following conclusions and determinations.
- The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the ser- vices to be provided by Dreyfus and the Sub-Adviser are adequate and appropriate.
- The Board concluded that the fee to be paid by the Fund to Dreyfus was reasonable, in light of the services to be provided, comparative expense and advisory fee information, and benefits anticipated to be derived by each of Dreyfus and the Sub-Adviser from its relation- ship with the Fund, and that, the fee to be paid by Dreyfus to the Sub-Adviser is reasonable and appropriate.
- The Board determined that because the Fund had not commenced investment operations, economies of scale were not a factor and that, to the extent in the future it were to be determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the Fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the Fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that approval of the Agreements was in the best interests of the Fund.
38
42
NOTES
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured Not Bank-Guaranteed May Lose Value
Contents | ||
THE FUND | ||
2 | A Letter from the CEO | |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance | |
6 | Fund Performance | |
8 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses | |
8 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses | |
With Those of Other Funds | ||
9 | Statement of Investments | |
13 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities | |
14 | Statement of Operations | |
15 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets | |
17 | Financial Highlights | |
21 | Notes to Financial Statements | |
33 | Report of Independent Registered | |
Public Accounting Firm | ||
34 | Important Tax Information | |
35 | Information About the Review and Approval | |
of the Fund’s Management Agreement | ||
39 | Board Members Information | |
42 | Officers of the Fund | |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | ||
Back Cover |
The Fund
Dreyfus |
Large Cap Equity Fund |
A LETTER FROM THE CEO Dear Shareholder: |
We present to you this annual report for Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund, covering the 12-month period from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008.
2008 was the most difficult year in decades for the economy and stock market.A credit crunch that originated in 2007 in the U.S. sub-prime mortgage market exploded in mid-2008 into a global financial crisis, resulting in the failures of major financial institutions, a deep and prolonged recession and lower investment values across a broad range of asset classes. Governments and regulators throughout the world moved aggressively to curtail the damage, implementing unprecedented reductions of short-term interest rates, massive injections of liquidity into the banking system, government bailouts of struggling companies and plans for massive economic stimulus programs.
Although we expect the U.S. and global economies to remain weak until longstanding imbalances have worked their way out of the system, the financial markets currently appear to have priced in investors’ generally low expectations. In previous recessions, however, the markets have tended to anticipate economic improvement before it occurs, potentially leading to major rallies when few expected them.That’s why it makes sense to remain disciplined, maintain a long-term perspective and adopt a consistent asset allocation strategy that reflects one’s future goals and attitudes toward risk.As always, we urge you to consult with your financial advisor, who can recommend the course of action that is right for you.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the fund’s Portfolio Manager.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum Chief Executive Officer The Dreyfus Corporation January 15, 2009 |
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008, as provided by Irene O’Neill, Portfolio Manager
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008, Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of –47.50%, Class C shares returned –45.96%, Class I shares returned –45.91%, and Class T shares returned –45.89% .1 In comparison, the broad-based S&P 500® Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of –37.00. 2 The fund’s underperformance relative to the Index was the result of both individual security selection and sector allocation. Specifically, stock selection in the information technology, financials and industrial sectors were the largest factors in the fund’s underperformance. Sector allocation also detracted from performance in the utilities and consumer staples sectors. On the positive side, stock selection in the telecommunications and consumer discretionary sectors aided our relative performance.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to provide long-term capital appreciation.To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large-capitalization companies.The fund considers large-cap companies to be those companies with market capitalizations of $5 billion or more at the time of purchase.The fund may invest up to 20% of its assets in the equity securities of companies with market capitalizations of less than $5 billion at the time of purchase. Such companies, however, generally will have market capitalizations of at least $100 million at the time of purchase.
The fund invests primarily in equity securities of U.S. issuers, but may invest without limitation in the equity securities of foreign issuers, including those in emerging markets.The fund’s equity investments may include common stocks, preferred stocks, convertible securities, warrants, equity interests in foreign investment funds or trusts, depositary receipts and other equity investments.
The fund invests primarily in large, established companies that we believe have proven track records and the potential for superior relative earnings growth. The investment process begins with a top-down assessment of broad economic, political and social trends and their implications for different market and industry sectors. Next, fundamental research is used to identify companies that we believe offer the potential for above-average
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued) |
earnings and revenue growth; sustainable competitive advantage; strong or improving financial condition; and/or earnings power that is either unrecognized or underestimated by the market.
Dramatic Developments Through the Year
Although many investors entered 2008 believing the U.S. economy would avoid a recession, deteriorating economic data quickly shifted the debate to questions about how deep the recession would run and how long it would last. During the year’s first half, unrelenting negative news flow from problems in the credit markets, the crisis at Bear Stearns, and major earnings losses in the financial sector depressed consumer and business confidence, despite continued profit growth for nonfinancial companies.
During the second half of the year, the markets and the economy went from bad to worse. In September, the federal government placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship; then, within a few days’ span in mid-September, Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy, AIG collapsed and required a massive infusion from the federal government, and Merrill Lynch was purchased in a hasty arrangement by Bank of America. These events undermined confidence in the U.S. financial system, causing credit markets to freeze and fears to spread that the recession would deteriorate into a modern depression. Fixed-income markets, with the sole exception of U.S.Treasuries, were similarly beaten down as fear of defaults caused credit spreads to widen dramatically and liquidity to dry up. In an effort to help stabilize the financial markets, the Federal Reserve cut the short-term rate target to near zero, and announced a series of unprecedented measures to help restore liquidity. In all, billions of dollars were committed by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury to restore order to the credit markets during the fourth quarter. By the end of 2008, some parts of the fixed-income markets seemed to be thawing, and the high yields offered by corporate bonds relative to Treasuries began to attract investor interest.
Stocks’ Weakness Was Broad-Based
During 2008, value stocks outperformed growth stocks, although both investment styles generated negative returns. Small-cap stocks outperformed by losing slightly less than mid- and large-cap stocks for the year. The year finished on a somewhat positive note, though, with the equity markets recovering more than 20% from their lows in November. Although all sectors posted negative absolute returns, the best-performing sectors on a relative basis for the fund were telecommunications and consumer discretionary.Within the telecommunications sector, telecom provider Verizon Communications was a good performer as its fiber
4
optic cable expansion continued to gain market share. In the consumer discretionary sector, specialty retailer Urban Outfitters was among the top five contributors on an absolute basis for the fund; while other retailers such as Target, Kohl’s and Lowe’s recorded negative absolute returns, on a relative basis they outperformed.
On the negative side, the information technology, financials and industrial sectors were the worst performing sectors for the fund. Silicon wafer manufacturer MEMC Electronic Materials and electronic memory equipment producers SanDisk and Seagate were among the weakest performers for the fund. Furthermore, mall owner General Growth Properties and insurers Genworth and XL Capital were laggards in the financials sector.
Our Outlook for 2009
Clearly, there is a great deal of uncertainty in the outlook for 2009. The timing of a bottom in the economy seems dependent on an end to the credit crisis. One hopeful sign is that the response to the global credit squeeze has been dramatic, both in the U.S. and abroad. Monetary stimulus from the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury is beginning to help stabilize the fixed-income markets, and fiscal stimulus in the form of spending programs and possible tax cuts are a virtual certainty in the coming year.
Despite a bleak outlook for corporate profits in the year’s first half, we believe the government’s interventions may help to stabilize the U.S. economy later in 2009.At this point, some observers believe the stock market bottomed in November 2008, but no one will be able to truly identify the turning point until this crisis is behind us.
January 15, 2009
1 | The total return figures presented for Class A and I shares of the fund reflect the performance of BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund (the “predecessor fund”) Class A shares and Institutional shares, respectively, prior to 9/13/08. Performance for each share class includes returns for the predecessor fund (Class A and Class I only) and the current maximum sales load, and reflects current distribution and servicing fees in effect only since the reorganization date. |
Investors should consider, when deciding whether to purchase a particular class of shares, the investment amount, anticipated holding period and other relevant factors. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect for Classes A, C, and T through May 1, 2009, and in effect for Class I through September 30, 2010, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital gain distributions.The Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index is a widely accepted, unmanaged index of U.S. stock market performance. |
The Fund 5
FUND PERFORMANCE |
† Source: Lipper Inc.
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.
The above graph compares a $10,000 investment made in Class A and Class I shares of Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund on 12/31/98 to a $10,000 investment made in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index (the “Index”) on that date. All dividends and capital gain distributions are reinvested.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, substantially all of the assets of another investment company advised by an affiliate of the fund’s investment adviser, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund (the “predecessor fund”), a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, Inc., were transferred to Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund in a tax-free reorganization.The predecessor fund has the same investment objective, policies, guidelines and restrictions as Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund.The performance of the fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T shares represent the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A and Institutional shares prior to the commencement of operations for Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund and the performance of Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T shares thereafter.
The fund’s performance shown in the line graph takes into account the maximum initial sales charge on Class A shares and all other applicable fees and expenses.The Index is a widely accepted, unmanaged index of U.S. stock market performance. Unlike a mutual fund, the Index is not subject to charges, fees and other expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. Further information relating to fund performance, including expense reimbursements, if applicable, is contained in the Financial Highlights section of the prospectus and elsewhere in this report.
6
Average Annual Total Returns as of 12/31/08 | ||||||||
Inception | ||||||||
Date | 1 Year | 5 Years | 10 Years | |||||
Class A shares | ||||||||
with maximum sales charge (5.75%) | (50.51)% | (5.87)% | (2.71)% | |||||
without sales charge | (47.50)% | (4.75)% | (2.14)% | |||||
Class C shares | ||||||||
with applicable redemption charge † | 09/13/08 | (46.46)%†† | (4.20)%†† | (1.85)%†† | ||||
without redemption | 09/13/08 | (45.96)%†† | (4.20)%†† | (1.85)%†† | ||||
Class I shares | (45.91)% | (4.00)% | (1.63)% | |||||
Class T shares | ||||||||
with applicable sales charge (4.5%) | 09/13/08 | (48.33)%†† | (5.05)%†† | (2.29)%†† | ||||
without sales charge | 09/13/08 | (45.89)%†† | (4.17)%†† | (1.84)%†† |
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.The fund’s performance shown in the graph and table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
- The maximum contingent deferred sales charge for Class C shares is 1% for shares redeemed within one year of the date of purchase.
- The total return performance figures presented for Class C and Class T shares of the fund reflect the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A and Institutional shares for periods prior to 09/13/08 (the inception date for Class C and Class T shares), adjusted to reflect the fund’s applicable sales loads for those class shares and the applicable distribution/servicing fees thereafter.
The Fund 7
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming actual returns for the six months ended December 31, 2008†
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000†† | $ 4.31 | $ 4.66 | $ 3.25 | $ 3.21 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $617.60 | $667.90 | $635.60 | $668.80 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended December 31, 2008
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000†††† | $ 5.38 | $ 9.42 | $ 4.01 | $ 6.50 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,019.81 | $1,015.79 | $1,021.17 | $1,018.70 |
- From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008 for Class C and Class T shares.
- Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.86% for Class C and 1.28% for Class T, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 110/366 (to reflect the actual days in the period).
Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.06% for Class A shares and .79% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
- Please note that while the Class C and Class T shares commenced initial offering on September 13, 2008, the Hypothetical expenses paid during the period reflect projected activity for the full six month period for purposes of comparability.This projection assumes that annualized expense ratios were in effect during the period July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008.
- Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.06% for Class A, 1.86% for Class C, .79% for Class I and 1.28% for Class T, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
8
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS December 31, 2008 |
Common Stocks—97.6% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Consumer Discretionary—8.2% | ||||
Comcast, Cl. A | 87,510 | 1,477,169 | ||
Johnson Controls | 158,740 | 2,882,718 | ||
Kohl’s | 97,450 a | 3,527,690 | ||
Lowe’s Cos. | 161,440 | 3,474,189 | ||
Staples | 149,000 | 2,670,080 | ||
Walt Disney | 116,380 | 2,640,662 | ||
16,672,508 | ||||
Consumer Staples—14.1% | ||||
Avon Products | 115,500 | 2,775,465 | ||
Kraft Foods, Cl. A | 119,730 | 3,214,751 | ||
PepsiCo | 71,470 | 3,914,412 | ||
Philip Morris International | 77,570 | 3,375,071 | ||
Procter & Gamble | 73,465 | 4,541,606 | ||
Safeway | 174,820 | 4,155,471 | ||
SYSCO | 131,190 | 3,009,499 | ||
Wal-Mart Stores | 69,800 | 3,912,988 | ||
28,899,263 | ||||
Energy—12.6% | ||||
BP, ADR | 54,550 | 2,549,667 | ||
Chevron | 58,040 | 4,293,219 | ||
Devon Energy | 35,220 | 2,314,306 | ||
Exxon Mobil | 90,610 | 7,233,396 | ||
Marathon Oil | 118,350 | 3,238,056 | ||
Nabors Industries | 61,240 a | 733,043 | ||
Schlumberger | 47,420 | 2,007,289 | ||
Southwestern Energy | 43,580 a | 1,262,513 | ||
Williams | 140,690 | 2,037,191 | ||
25,668,680 | ||||
Financial—11.2% | ||||
Aflac | 50,220 | 2,302,085 | ||
American Express | 113,755 | 2,110,155 | ||
Bank of America | 174,920 | 2,462,873 |
The Fund 9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Financial (continued) | ||||
Invesco | 152,440 | 2,201,233 | ||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 99,070 | 3,123,677 | ||
Merrill Lynch & Co. | 77,920 | 906,989 | ||
Morgan Stanley | 140,140 | 2,247,846 | ||
PartnerRe | 14,170 | 1,009,896 | ||
PNC Financial Services Group | 41,660 | 2,041,340 | ||
State Street | 51,010 | 2,006,223 | ||
U.S. Bancorp | 101,870 | 2,547,769 | ||
22,960,086 | ||||
Health Care—14.0% | ||||
Abbott Laboratories | 77,840 | 4,154,321 | ||
Cardinal Health | 56,270 | 1,939,627 | ||
Cephalon | 28,040 a | 2,160,202 | ||
Covidien | 82,890 | 3,003,933 | ||
Gilead Sciences | 66,010 a | 3,375,751 | ||
Johnson & Johnson | 56,030 | 3,352,275 | ||
Medtronic | 60,850 | 1,911,907 | ||
Merck & Co. | 115,060 | 3,497,824 | ||
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, ADR | 76,590 | 3,260,436 | ||
Thermo Fisher Scientific | 55,140 a | 1,878,620 | ||
28,534,896 | ||||
Industrial—11.1% | ||||
3M | 34,240 | 1,970,170 | ||
Caterpillar | 60,700 | 2,711,469 | ||
Deere & Co. | 47,120 | 1,805,638 | ||
Eaton | 45,160 | 2,244,904 | ||
Emerson Electric | 300 | 10,983 | ||
General Electric | 218,010 | 3,531,762 | ||
Honeywell International | 108,070 | 3,547,938 | ||
Textron | 117,370 | 1,627,922 | ||
Union Pacific | 50,470 | 2,412,466 | ||
United Technologies | 52,390 | 2,808,104 | ||
22,671,356 |
10
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Information Technology—17.2% | ||||
Accenture, Cl. A | 113,240 | 3,713,139 | ||
Akamai Technologies | 124,990 a | 1,886,099 | ||
Apple | 53,910 a | 4,601,218 | ||
Broadcom, Cl. A | 98,180 a | 1,666,114 | ||
Cisco Systems | 135,820 a | 2,213,866 | ||
Corning | 143,050 | 1,363,267 | ||
Google, Cl. A | 8,130 a | 2,501,195 | ||
Hewlett-Packard | 66,010 | 2,395,503 | ||
Intel | 113,730 | 1,667,282 | ||
MasterCard, Cl. A | 7,870 | 1,124,859 | ||
Microsoft | 117,790 | 2,289,838 | ||
Oracle | 169,070 a | 2,997,611 | ||
QUALCOMM | 96,810 | 3,468,702 | ||
Taiwan Semiconductor | ||||
Manufacturing, ADR | 206,210 | 1,629,059 | ||
Visa, Cl. A | 30,060 | 1,576,647 | ||
35,094,399 | ||||
Materials—1.6% | ||||
Air Products & Chemicals | 45,940 | 2,309,404 | ||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold | 42,110 | 1,029,168 | ||
3,338,572 | ||||
Telecommunication | ||||
Services—3.7% | ||||
AT & T | 119,240 | 3,398,340 | ||
Verizon Communications | 124,650 | 4,225,635 | ||
7,623,975 | ||||
Utilities—3.9% | ||||
Public Service Enterprise Group | 105,710 | 3,083,561 | ||
Questar | 65,230 | 2,132,369 | ||
Sempra Energy | 63,410 | 2,703,168 | ||
7,919,098 | ||||
Total Common Stocks | ||||
(cost $261,190,731) | 199,382,833 |
The Fund 11
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Other Investment—.6% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||||
(cost $1,103,000) | 1,103,000 b | 1,103,000 | ||
Total Investments (cost $262,293,731) | 98.2% | 200,485,833 | ||
Cash and Receivables (Net) | 1.8% | 3,748,340 | ||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 204,234,173 |
ADR—American Depository Receipts |
a | Non-income producing security. |
b | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | ||||||
Value (%) | Value (%) | |||||
Information Technology | 17.2 | Consumer Discretionary | 8.2 | |||
Consumer Staples | 14.1 | Utilities | 3.9 | |||
Health Care | 14.0 | Telecommunication Services | 3.7 | |||
Energy | 12.6 | Materials | 1.6 | |||
Financial | 11.2 | Money Market Investment | .6 | |||
Industrial | 11.1 | 98.2 | ||||
† Based on net assets. | ||||||
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2008
Cost | Value | |||||||
Assets ($): | ||||||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | ||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 261,190,731 199,382,833 | |||||||
Affiliated issuers | 1,103,000 | 1,103,000 | ||||||
Cash | 279,060 | |||||||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 3,263,579 | |||||||
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | 722,241 | |||||||
Dividends and interest receivable | 560,906 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses | 14,166 | |||||||
205,325,785 | ||||||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 119,868 | |||||||
Due to Administrator—Note 3(a) | 2,399 | |||||||
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | 869,446 | |||||||
Interest payable—Note 2 | 677 | |||||||
Accrued expenses | 99,222 | |||||||
1,091,612 | ||||||||
Net Assets ($) | 204,234,173 | |||||||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||||||
Paid-in capital | 311,259,717 | |||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (45,217,646) | |||||||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | ||||||||
(depreciation) on investments | (61,807,898) | |||||||
Net Assets ($) | 204,234,173 | |||||||
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Net Assets ($) | 169,698 | 6,676 | 204,051,112 | 6,687 | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 23,690 | 905 | 27,580,539 | 905 | ||||
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 7.16 | 7.38 | 7.40 | 7.39 | ||||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 13
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2008 | ||
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends (net of $26,834 foreign taxes withheld at source): | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 7,097,163 | |
Affiliated issuers | 7,019 | |
Income from securities lending | 127,370 | |
Total Income | 7,231,552 | |
Expenses: | ||
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 2,054,955 | |
Administration fee—Note 3(a) | 260,232 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 115,438 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 41,430 | |
Registration fees | 39,083 | |
Professional fees | 38,900 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 34,057 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 29,561 | |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 18,928 | |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 677 | |
Miscellaneous | 57,338 | |
Total Expenses | 2,690,599 | |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertakings—Note 3(a) | (41,344) | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 1(b) | (1,143) | |
Net Expenses | 2,648,112 | |
Investment Income—Net | 4,583,440 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (45,112,227) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on options transactions | 14,031 | |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (45,098,196) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | ||
on investments and options transactions | (148,473,373) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | (193,571,569) | |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (188,988,129) | |
See notes to financial statements. |
14
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 4,583,440 | 3,937,979 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (45,098,196) | 41,965,083 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | (148,473,373) | (321,876) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | (188,988,129) | 45,581,186 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A Shares | (165,423) | (186,149) | ||
Class I Shares | (3,036,281) | (3,677,057) | ||
Net realized gain on investments: | ||||
Class A Shares | (1,010,825) | (2,279,880) | ||
Class I Shares | (14,820,734) | (33,123,299) | ||
Return of capital: | ||||
Class A Shares | (211,405) | — | ||
Class I Shares | (3,099,625) | — | ||
Total Dividends | (22,344,293) | (39,266,385) | ||
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 760,408 | 596,070 | ||
Class C Shares | 10,000 | — | ||
Class I Shares | 274,286,932 | 39,214,009 | ||
Class T Shares | 10,000 | — | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A Shares | 1,310,915 | 2,344,938 | ||
Class I Shares | 18,400,380 | 33,250,171 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (21,373,546) | (4,352,260) | ||
Class I Shares | (286,231,457) | (62,496,028) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
from Capital Stock Transactions | (12,826,368) | 8,556,900 | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (224,158,790) | 14,871,701 | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 428,392,963 | 413,521,262 | ||
End of Period | 204,234,173 | 428,392,963 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | — | 34,250 |
The Fund 15
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 70,535 | 39,418 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 118,080 | 156,947 | ||
Shares redeemed | (2,039,111) | (290,987) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (1,850,496) | (94,622) | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 905 | — | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 22,840,412 | 2,611,489 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 1,662,506 | 2,219,847 | ||
Shares redeemed | (24,274,378) | (4,110,963) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 228,540 | 720,373 | ||
Class T | ||||
Shares sold | 905 | — |
a | The fund commenced offering four classes of shares after the close of business September 12, 2008.The existing shares were redesignated and the fund added Class C and Class T shares. |
b | Represents information for the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund through September 12, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund’s Class A and Class I shares represents the financial highlights of the Class A and Institutional shares, respectively of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund (“Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Class A and Class I shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Class A and Class I shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Class A Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 14.61 | 14.42 | 13.35 | 13.22 | 12.33 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—neta | .12 | .10 | .10 | .10 | .25 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (6.80) | 1.48 | 2.03 | .73 | .86 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | (6.68) | 1.58 | 2.13 | .83 | 1.11 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.09) | (.10) | (.08) | (.15) | (.22) | |||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||
gain on investments | (.56) | (1.29) | (.98) | (.55) | — | |||||
Return of capital | (.12) | — | — | — | — | |||||
Total Distributions | (.77) | (1.39) | (1.06) | (.70) | (.22) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 7.16 | 14.61 | 14.42 | 13.35 | 13.22 | |||||
Total Return (%)b | (47.50) | 10.94 | 16.11 | 6.25 | 9.11 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.11 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.10 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.04 | 1.10 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .99 | .69 | .69 | .75 | 1.99 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 77 | 66 | 53 | 52 | 40 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 170 | 27,391 | 28,389 | 28,980 | 33,720 |
- Represents information for Class A shares of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund, through September 12, 2008.
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Exclusive of sales charge. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 17
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued) |
Year Ended | ||
Class C Shares | December 31, 2008a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 11.05 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—netb | .02 | |
Net realized and unrealized | ||
gain (loss) on investments | (3.69) | |
Total from Investment Operations | (3.67) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 7.38 | |
Total Return (%)c | (33.21)d | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.88e | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.86e | |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | .85e | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 77 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 7 |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Class I Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 14.66 | 14.46 | 13.38 | 13.26 | 12.37 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—neta | .16 | .14 | .13 | .13 | .28 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (6.63) | 1.49 | 2.05 | .72 | .86 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | (6.47) | 1.63 | 2.18 | .85 | 1.14 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.11) | (.14) | (.12) | (.18) | (.25) | |||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||
gain on investments | (.56) | (1.29) | (.98) | (.55) | — | |||||
Return of capital | (.12) | — | — | — | — | |||||
Total Distributions | (.79) | (1.43) | (1.10) | (.73) | (.25) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 7.40 | 14.66 | 14.46 | 13.38 | 13.26 | |||||
Total Return (%) | (45.91) | 11.27 | 16.43 | 6.42 | 9.35 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .80 | .79 | .78 | .79 | .85 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .79 | .79 | .78 | .79 | .85 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.41 | .94 | .93 | .99 | 2.24 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 77 | 66 | 53 | 52 | 40 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 204,051 | 401,002 | 385,132 | 360,168 | 343,346 |
- Represents information for Institutional shares of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund, through September 12, 2008.
a Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. See notes to financial statements.
The Fund 19
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued) |
Year Ended | ||
Class T Shares | December 31, 2008a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 11.05 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—netb | .03 | |
Net realized and unrealized | ||
gain (loss) on investments | (3.69) | |
Total from Investment Operations | (3.66) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 7.39 | |
Total Return (%)c | (33.12)d | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.38e | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.28e | |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | 1.43e | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 77 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 7 |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
20
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”, which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering nine series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective is long-term capital appreciation.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by the fund’s Board of Directors, all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of Hamilton Large Cap Equity, a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, were transferred to the Fund in exchange for corresponding class of shares of Common Stock of the fund of equal value. Shareholders of Class A and Institutional shares of Hamilton Large Cap Equity received Class A and Class I shares of the fund, respectively, in each case in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in Hamilton Large Cap Equity at the time of the exchange. On the date of the exchange, the Fund created Class C and Class T shares.The net asset value of the fund’s shares on the close of business September 12, 2008, after the reorganization was $11.01 for Class A shares and $11.05 for Class I shares, and a total of 1,904,712 Class A shares and 27,919,615 Class I shares, representing net assets of $329,352,655 (including $637,352 net unrealized depreciation on investments) were issued to shareholders of Hamilton Large Cap Equity shareholders in the exchange.The exchange was a tax-free event for shareholders of the fund. Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund is the accounting survivor and its historical performance is presented for periods through September 12, 2008.
At a meeting of the Board of Directors held on July 10, 2008, the Board approved, effective December 1, 2008, a proposal to change the name of the fund from “Dreyfus Premier Large Cap Equity Fund” to “Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund”.
The Fund 21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
Effective July 1, 2008, BNY Mellon reorganized and consolidated a number of its banking and trust company subsidiaries.As a result of the reorganization, any services previously provided to the fund by Mellon Bank, N.A. or Mellon Trust of New England, N.A. are now provided by The Bank of NewYork Mellon (formerly,The Bank of NewYork).
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares.The fund is authorized to issue 50 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C and ClassT and 100 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock of Class I. Class A and ClassT shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase, Class I shares are sold at net asset value per share only to institutional investors. Effective December 3, 2008, investments for new accounts were no longer permitted in Class T of the fund, except that participants in certain group retirement plans were able to open a new account in Class T of the fund, provided that the fund was established as an investment option under the plans before December 3, 2008. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
22
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The Fund 23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
The fund adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “FairValue Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes an authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to FAS 157.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the fund’s investments carried at fair value:
Investments in | Other Financial | |||
Valuation Inputs | Securities ($) | Instruments ($)† | ||
Level 1—Quoted Prices | 200,485,833 | 0�� | ||
Level 2—Other Significant | ||||
Observable Inputs | 0 | 0 | ||
Level 3—Significant | ||||
Unobservable Inputs | 0 | 0 | ||
Total | 200,485,833 | 0 |
† | Other financial instruments include derivative instruments, such as futures, forward currency | |
exchange contracts and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation | ||
(depreciation) on the instrument and written options contracts which are shown at value. |
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
24
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management banks whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement withThe Bank of NewYork Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended September 12, 2008, The Bank of NewYork Mellon earns a fee, payable monthly equal to seven basis points (.07%) of the weighted average daily market value of the securities loaned by the fund during the preceding calendar month. This agreement was terminated as of the close of business, on September 12, 2008, due to reorganization.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by the Manager are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized
The Fund 25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund did not have any liabilities for any unrecognized tax positions. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the four-year period ended December 31, 2008 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
At December 31, 2008, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows: accumulated capital losses $6,041,050 and unrealized depreciation $62,903,621. In addition, the fund had $38,080,873 of capital losses realized after October 31, 2008, which were deferred for tax purposes to the first day of the following fiscal year.
The accumulated capital loss carryover is available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to December 31, 2008. If not applied, the carryover expires in fiscal 2016.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows: ordinary income $4,819,925 and $9,685,545, long-term capital gains $14,213,338 and $29,580,840 and return of capital $3,311,030 and $0, respectively.
26
During the period ended December 31, 2008, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to the tax treatment for real estate investment trusts and return of capital distribution, the fund decreased accumulated undistributed investment income-net by $1,415,986, increased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments by $4,727,016 and decreased paid-in capital by $3,311,030. Net assets and net asset value per share were not affected by this reclassification.
NOTE 2—Bank Line of Credit:
Effective October 15, 2008, the fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $145 million redemption credit facility (the “Facility”) to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing.
The average daily amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facility during the period ended December 31,2008,was approximately $23,200 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 2.92% .
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a Management Agreement (“Agreement”) with the Manager, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .70% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. Prior to September 12, 2008,The Bank of New York (the “Advisor”) was the advisor for Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund.The advisor’s fee was computed at an annual rate of .60% of the value of Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund’s average daily net assets and was payable monthly. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor and Manager earned $1,561,394 and $493,561, respectively.
The Fund 27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
Dreyfus has contractually agreed, until September 30, 2010, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class I shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .79%.
Dreyfus has agreed, effective September 24, 2008, until May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder services fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.00% .
Dreyfus has agreed, until May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class C and Class T (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder service fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.00% .
The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertakings, amounted to $41,344 during the period ended December 31, 2008.
The Bank of NewYork served as Administrator to Hamilton Large Cap Equity pursuant to an Administration Agreement. The Administrator received from Hamilton Large Cap Equity a monthly fee equal to an annual rate of .10% of the average daily net assets of Hamilton Large Cap Equity. Administration fees amounted to $260,232 for the period ended September 12, 2008. This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, due to the reorganization.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .75% and .25% of the value of their respective average daily net assets. During the period ended December 31, 2008, Class C and Class T shares were charged $16 and $6, respectively, pursuant to the Plan.
28
Under the prior Distribution Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class A shares paid BNY Hamilton Distributors, Inc. for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .25% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class A. During the period January 1, 2008 through September 12, 2008, Class A shares were charged $41,408. This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of ..25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended December 31, 2008, Class A, Class C and Class T shares were charged $1,348,$5 and $6,respectively,pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $19,428 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $1,143 pursuant to the cash management agreement.
The Fund 29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $29,561 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $1,197 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $121,108, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $1,740, shareholder services plan fees $9, custodian fees $9,832, chief compliance officer fees $1,197, and transfer agency per account fees $4,491, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $18,509.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and options transactions, during the period ended December 31, 2008, amounted to $252,860,198 and $279,500,704, respectively.
The fund may purchase and write (sell) put and call options in order to gain exposure to or to protect against changes in the market.
As a writer of call options, the fund receives a premium at the outset and then bears the market risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the financial instrument underlying the option. Generally, the fund would incur a gain, to the extent of the premium, if the price of the underlying financial instrument decreases between the date the option is written and the date on which the option is terminated. Generally, the fund would realize a loss, if the price of the financial instrument increases between those dates.
30
As a writer of put options, the fund receives a premium at the outset and then bears the market risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the financial instrument underlying the option. Generally, the fund would incur a gain, to the extent of the premium, if the price of the underlying financial instrument increases between the date the option is written and the date on which the option is terminated. Generally, the fund would realize a loss, if the price of the financial instrument decreases between those dates.
The following summarizes the fund’s call/put options written for the period ended December 31, 2008:
Options Terminated | ||||||||
Number of | Premiums | Net Realized | ||||||
Options Written: | Contracts | Received ($) | Cost ($) Gain (Loss) ($) | |||||
Contracts outstanding | ||||||||
December 31, 2007 | — | — | ||||||
Contracts written | 493 | 415,044 | ||||||
Contracts terminated: | ||||||||
Contracts expired | 493 | 415,044 | 401,013 | 14,031 | ||||
Contracts outstanding | ||||||||
December 31, 2008 | — | — |
At December 31, 2008, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $263,389,454; accordingly, accumulated net unrealized depreciation on investments was $62,903,621, consisting of $11,510,380 gross unrealized appreciation and $74,414,001 gross unrealized depreciation.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The
The Fund 31
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
application of FAS 161 is required for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements and the accompanying notes has not yet been determined.
NOTE 5—Subsequent Event:
On February 4, 2009, the fund issued to each holder of its ClassT shares, in exchange for said shares, Class A shares of the fund having an aggregate net asset value equal to the aggregate net asset value of the shareholder’s Class T shares. Subsequent investments in the fund’s Class A shares made by prior holders of the fund’s ClassT shares who received Class A shares of the fund in exchange for their Class T shares are subject to the front-end sales load schedule that was in effect for Class T shares at the time of the exchange. Otherwise, all other Class A share attributes will be in effect.
32
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund |
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the statement of investments, of Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund (one of the series comprising Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc.) as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets for the year then ended and financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31,2004.These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The statement of changes in net assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the financial highlights for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were audited by other auditors whose report dated February 28, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on such statement of changes in net assets and financial highlights.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2008 by correspondence with the custodian and others. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above and audited by us present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Large Cap Equity Fund at December 31, 2008, the results of its operations and the changes in its net assets for the year then ended and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
New York, New York |
February 25, 2009 |
The Fund 33
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
For federal tax purposes, the fund hereby designates 100% of the ordinary dividends paid during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as qualifying for the corporate dividends received deduction. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, certain dividends paid by the fund may be subject to a maximum tax rate of 15%, as provided for by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. Of the distributions paid during the fiscal year, $4,819,925 represents the maximum amount that may be considered qualified dividend income. Shareholders will receive notification in January 2009 of the percentage applicable to the preparation of their 2008 income tax returns. Also the fund hereby designates $.5056 per share as a long-term capital gain distribution and $.0083 per share as a short-term capital gain distribution paid on September 11, 2008.
34
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
At the March 18, 2008, Board meeting, the Board members established the Fund as a separate series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), and authorized the Company, on behalf of the Fund, to enter into an agreement and plan of reorganization to acquire all of the assets and liabilities of BNY Hamilton Large Cap Equity Fund (the “BNY Fund”) in a tax-free reorganization in exchange for shares of the Fund and the assumption by the Fund of the BNY Fund’s stated liabilities. The Fund was established solely for the purpose of effecting the BNY Fund’s reorganization and, as a result, the Fund adopted the same or substantially similar investment objective and policies as the BNY Fund and expected to inherit the performance and financial records of the BNY Fund.
At the meeting, the Board considered the approval of, with respect to the Fund, the management agreement, between the Company and Dreyfus (the “Agreement”) through July 30, 2010.The Board members who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the Act) of the Company were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus.
Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services To Be Provided to the Fund. The Board members received a presentation from representatives of Dreyfus regarding services provided to the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and discussed the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided to the Fund pursuant to the Agreement. The Board members also referenced information provided and discussed at the meeting regarding the fund’s distribution of accounts, the relationships Dreyfus has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each, the diversity of distribution among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each of the funds’ distribution channels.
The Fund 35
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ research and portfolio management capabilities and that Dreyfus provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructure.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance, Management Fee, and Expense Ratio. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, the Board members were not able to review the Fund’s performance. The Board was advised, however, that the Fund was expected to inherit the BNY Fund’s performance record upon the closing of the reorganization. The Board members received a presentation from Dreyfus that described, among other matters, the BNY Fund’s average annual total returns for the various periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board discussed with the Dreyfus representatives the Fund’s investment objective and policies and portfolio management team, and noted that the team responsible for managing the BNY Fund will continue to manage the Fund.
The Board members reviewed the Fund’s proposed management fee and estimated expense ratio, and reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios of the funds in the Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds category, the average and median management fees of the funds in that Lipper category and management fees of a subset of those funds.
The Board also noted that Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the Fund’s Class I and Class A shares so that the direct expenses of the Class I and Class A shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 0.77% and 1.04%, respectively. This expense undertaking will continue in effect for the Fund’s Class I shares for at least two years after the reorganization of the BNY Fund, and for the Fund’s Class A shares until such Class A shares received by holders of Class A shares of the BNY Fund are converted to Class I shares of the Fund.
36
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the fees paid to Dreyfus or its affiliates by mutual funds and/or separate accounts managed by Dreyfus with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the Fund (the “Similar Accounts”), and explained the nature of the Similar Accounts and the differences, from Dreyfus’ perspective, in providing services to the Similar Accounts as compared to the Fund.The Dreyfus representatives also reviewed the costs associated with distribution through intermediaries. The Board analyzed differences in fees paid to Dreyfus and its affiliates by the Similar Accounts and discussed the relationship of the advisory fee to be paid in light of the services to be provided by Dreyfus.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Accounts managed by Dreyfus, to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the Fund’s management fees. The Board acknowledged that differences in fees paid by the Similar Accounts seemed to be consistent with the services to be provided.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, Dreyfus’ representatives were not able to review the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus. The Board members were presented with a schedule of the estimated profitability of the Fund prepared by Dreyfus. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the unlikelihood of soft dollar arrangements in the future with respect to trading the Fund’s portfolio. The Board also considered whether the Fund would be able to participate in any economies of scale that Dreyfus may experience in the event that the Fund attracts a large amount of assets.The Board members noted the uncertainty of the estimated asset levels, and discussed the renewal requirements for advisory agreements and their ability to review the management fee annually after an initial term of the Agreement.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to approving the Agreement. Based on the
The Fund 37
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
discussions and considerations as described above, the Board made the following conclusions and determinations.
- The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the ser- vices to be provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
- The Board concluded that the fee to be paid by the Fund to Dreyfus was reasonable, in light of the services to be provided, comparative expense and advisory fee information, and benefits anticipated to be derived by Dreyfus from its relationship with the Fund.
- The Board determined that because the Fund had not commenced investment operations, economies of scale were not a factor and that, to the extent in the future it were to be determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the Fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the Fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that approval of the Agreement was in the best interests of the Fund.
38
NOTES
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured Not Bank-Guaranteed May Lose Value
Contents | ||
THE FUND | ||
2 | A Letter from the CEO | |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance | |
6 | Fund Performance | |
8 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses | |
8 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses | |
With Those of Other Funds | ||
9 | Statement of Investments | |
13 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities | |
14 | Statement of Operations | |
15 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets | |
17 | Financial Highlights | |
21 | Notes to Financial Statements | |
33 | Report of Independent Registered | |
Public Accounting Firm | ||
34 | Important Tax Information | |
35 | Information About the Review and Approval | |
of the Fund’s Management Agreement | ||
39 | Board Members Information | |
42 | Officers of the Fund | |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | ||
Back Cover |
The Fund
Dreyfus |
Large Cap Growth Fund |
A LETTER FROM THE CEO Dear Shareholder: |
We present to you this annual report for Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund, covering the 12-month period from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008.
2008 was the most difficult year in decades for the economy and stock market.A credit crunch that originated in 2007 in the U.S. sub-prime mortgage market exploded in mid-2008 into a global financial crisis, resulting in the failures of major financial institutions, a deep and prolonged recession and lower investment values across a broad range of asset classes. Governments and regulators throughout the world moved aggressively to curtail the damage, implementing unprecedented reductions of short-term interest rates, massive injections of liquidity into the banking system, government bailouts of struggling companies and plans for massive economic stimulus programs.
Although we expect the U.S. and global economies to remain weak until longstanding imbalances have worked their way out of the system, the financial markets currently appear to have priced in investors’ generally low expectations. In previous recessions, however, the markets have tended to anticipate economic improvement before it occurs, potentially leading to major rallies when few expected them. That’s why it makes sense to remain disciplined, maintain a long-term perspective and adopt a consistent asset allocation strategy that reflects one’s future goals and attitudes toward risk. As always, we urge you to consult with your financial advisor, who can recommend the course of action that is right for you. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the fund’s Portfolio Manager.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum Chief Executive Officer The Dreyfus Corporation January 15, 2009 |
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008, as provided by Irene O’Neill, Portfolio Manager
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008, Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund’s Class A shares produced a total return of –41.90% and Class I shares returned –42.03% ..1 In comparison, the Russell 1000® Growth Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of –38.44% .2 For the period of September 13, 2008, through December 31, 2008, Class C shares returned –31.00%, and Class T shares returned –30.84% .1 The Index achieved a total return of –29.06% for the same period.2 The fund’s underperformance relative to the Index was the result of both individual security selection and sector allocation. Stock selection and sector overweightings in the information technology sector and the “other” category (which is composed primarily of conglomerates) were the primary drivers of the fund’s underperformance. Stock selection in the financial services and consumer staples sectors also contributed to the negative returns. Partially countering these negative factors, sector allocation and stock selection in the health care, materials and producer durables sectors helped our performance.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to provide long-term capital appreciation.To pursue this goal, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large capitalization companies.The fund considers large-cap companies to be those companies with market capitalizations of $5 billion or more at the time of purchase.The fund may invest up to 20% of its assets in the equity securities of companies with market capitalizations of less than $5 billion at the time of purchase. Such companies, however, generally will have market capitalizations of at least $100 million at the time of purchase. The fund will invest primarily in equity securities of U.S. issuers, but may invest without limitation in the equity securities of foreign issuers, including those in emerging market countries.The fund’s equity investments may include common stocks, preferred stocks, convertible securities, warrants, equity interests in foreign investment funds or trusts, depositary receipts and other equity investments.
The fund invests primarily in large, established companies that we believe have proven track records and the potential for superior relative earnings growth. The investment process begins with a top-down assessment of broad economic, political and social trends and their implications for different market and industry sectors. Next, fundamental research is used to identify companies that we believe offer the potential for accelerating earnings or revenue growth, favorable market positions, improving operating inefficiencies, and/or increasing earnings per share.
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued) |
Dramatic Developments Through the Year
Although most investors entered 2008 believing the U.S. economy would avoid a recession, deteriorating economic data quickly shifted the debate to questions about how deep the recession would run and how long it would last. During the year’s first half, unrelenting negative news flow from problems in the credit markets, the crisis at Bear Stearns, and major earnings losses in the financial sector depressed consumer and business confidence, despite continued profit growth for nonfinancial companies.
During the second half of the year, the markets and the economy went from bad to worse. In September, the federal government placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship; then, within a few days’ span in mid-September, Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy, AIG collapsed and required a massive infusion from the federal government, and Merrill Lynch was purchased in a hasty arrangement by Bank of America. These events undermined confidence in the U.S. financial system, causing credit markets to freeze and fears to spread that the recession would deteriorate into a modern depression. Fixed-income markets, with the sole exception of U.S.Treasuries, were similarly beaten down as fear of defaults caused credit spreads to widen dramatically and liquidity to dry up. In an effort to help stabilize the financial markets, the Federal Reserve cut the short-term federal funds rate target to near zero, and announced a series of unprecedented measures to help restore liquidity. In all, billions of dollars were committed by the Federal Reserve and the Treasury to restore order to the credit markets during the fourth quarter.
Stocks’ Weakness Was Broad-Based
During 2008, value stocks outperformed growth stocks, although both investment styles generated negative returns. Small-cap stocks outperformed by losing slightly less than mid- and large-cap stocks for the year. The year finished on a somewhat positive note, though, with the equity markets recovering more than 20% from their lows in November. Although all of the sectors had negative absolute returns for the year, the best performing sectors on a relative basis for the fund were health care, materials and producer durables.Among our health care holdings, biopharmaceutical companies Cephalon, Celgene and Gilead Sciences provided positive returns. Our underweighting in the weak materials sector helped our relative performance. Also, individual stock selections — particularly our position in the globally diversified industrial United Technologies — in the producer durables sector contributed positively to performance.
On the negative side, the information technology and energy sectors were among the weakest areas for the fund. Semiconductor wafer
4
manufacturer MEMC Electronic Materials and electronics memory equipment producer Seagate Technology performed poorly in the face of weakening corporate and consumer spending on technology. In the energy sector, Hercules Offshore, which provides drilling and marine services to the oil and natural gas industries, was hurt by declining demand and falling commodity prices. Our positions in these three securities were sold during the reporting period.
The fund’s performance was also hurt by our assumption that infrastructure spending by developing economies, which is needed to serve an emerging industrial and consumer base, would be relatively unaffected by the slowdown in the U.S. A number of our industrial holdings, including Boeing and Caterpillar, suffered as the global dimension of the economic crisis became apparent.
Our Outlook for 2009
Clearly, there is a great deal of uncertainty in the outlook for 2009. The timing of a bottom in the economy seems dependent on an end to the credit crisis. One hopeful sign is that the response to the global credit squeeze has been dramatic, both in the U.S. and abroad. Monetary stimulus from the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury is beginning to help stabilize the fixed-income markets, and fiscal stimulus in the form of spending programs and possible tax cuts are a virtual certainty in the coming year.
Despite a bleak outlook for corporate profits in the year’s first half, we believe the government’s interventions may help to stabilize the U.S. economy later in 2009.At this point, some observers believe the stock market bottomed in November 2008, but no one will be able to truly identify the turning point until this crisis is behind us.
January 15, 2009
1 | The total return figures presented for Class A and I shares of the fund reflect the performance of BNY Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund’s (the “predecessor fund”) Class A shares and Institutional shares, respectively, prior to 9/13/08. Performance for each share class includes returns for the predecessor fund (Class A and Class I only) and the current maximum sales load, and reflects current distribution and servicing fees in effect only since the reorganization date. |
Investors should consider, when deciding whether to purchase a particular class of shares, the investment amount, anticipated holding period and other relevant factors. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect for Classes A, C, and T through May 1, 2009, and in effect for Class I through September 30, 2010, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of net dividends and, where applicable, capital gain distributions.The Russell 1000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. Index return does not reflect fees and expenses associated with operating a mutual fund. |
The Fund 5
† Source: Lipper Inc.
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.
The above graph compares a $10,000 investment made in Class A and Class I shares of Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund on 12/31/98 to a $10,000 investment made in the Russell 1000 Growth Index (the “Index”) on that date. All dividends and capital gain distributions are reinvested.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, substantially all of the assets of another investment company advised by an affiliate of the fund’s investment adviser, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund (the “predecessor fund”), a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, Inc., were transferred to Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund in a tax-free reorganization. The predecessor fund has the same investment objective, policies, guidelines and restrictions as Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund.The performance of the fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T shares represent the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A and Institutional shares prior to the commencement of operations for Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund and the performance of Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T shares thereafter.
The fund’s performance shown in the line graph takes into account the maximum initial sales charge on Class A shares and all other applicable fees and expenses.The Index is an unmanaged index which measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. Unlike a mutual fund, the Index is not subject to charges, fees and other expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. Further information relating to fund performance, including expense reimbursements, if applicable, is contained in the Financial Highlights section of the prospectus and elsewhere in this report.
6
Average Annual Total Returns as of 12/31/08 | ||||||||
Inception | ||||||||
Date | 1 Year | 5 Years | 10 Years | |||||
Class A shares | ||||||||
with maximum sales charge (5.75%) | (45.22)% | (6.74)% | (3.94)% | |||||
without sales charge | (41.90)% | (5.62)% | (3.37)% | |||||
Class C shares | ||||||||
with applicable redemption charge † | 09/13/08 | (42.06)%†† | (5.50)%†† | (3.31)%†† | ||||
without redemption | 09/13/08 | (41.51)%†† | (5.50)%†† | (3.31)%†† | ||||
Class I shares | (42.03)% | (5.46)% | (3.19)% | |||||
Class T shares | ||||||||
with applicable sales charge (4.5%) | 09/13/08 | (44.00)%†† | (6.31)%†† | (3.73)%†† | ||||
without sales charge | 09/13/08 | (41.38)%†† | (5.45)%†† | (3.28)%†† |
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.The fund’s performance shown in the graph and table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
- The maximum contingent deferred sales charge for Class C shares is 1% for shares redeemed within one year of the date of purchase.
- The total return performance figures presented for Class C and Class T shares of the fund reflect the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A and Institutional shares for periods prior to 09/13/08 (the inception date for Class C and Class T shares), adjusted to reflect the fund’s applicable sales loads for those class shares and the applicable distribution/servicing fees thereafter.
The Fund 7
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming actual returns for the six months ended December 31, 2008†
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000†† | $ 4.46 | $ 4.85 | $ 3.37 | $ 3.64 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $658.10 | $690.00 | $656.60 | $691.60 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended December 31, 2008
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000†††† | $ 5.43 | $ 9.68 | $ 4.12 | $ 7.25 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,019.76 | $1,015.53 | $1,021.06 | $1,017.95 |
† From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008 for Class C and Class T shares.
- Expenses are equal to the fund's annualized expense ratio of 1.07% for Class A shares and .81% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period), and 1.91% for Class C and 1.43% for Class T, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 110/366 (to reflect the actual days in the period).
- Please note that while Class C and Class T shares commenced initial offering on September 13, 2008, the Hypothetical expenses paid during the period reflect projected activity for the full six month period for purposes of comparability.This projection assumes that annualized expense ratios were in effect during the period July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008.
- Expenses are equal to the fund's annualized expense ratio of 1.07% for Class A, 1.91% for Class C, .81% for Class I and 1.43% for Class T, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
8
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS December 31, 2008 |
Common Stocks—98.8% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Autos & Transports—2.6% | ||||
Union Pacific | 20,250 | 967,950 | ||
United Parcel Service, Cl. B | 17,500 | 965,300 | ||
1,933,250 | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—14.6% | ||||
Accenture, Cl. A | 65,200 | 2,137,908 | ||
Activision Blizzard | 56,350 a | 486,864 | ||
Avon Products | 47,950 | 1,152,238 | ||
Johnson Controls | 56,650 | 1,028,764 | ||
Kohl’s | 29,550 a | 1,069,710 | ||
Lowe’s Cos. | 57,300 | 1,233,096 | ||
Wal-Mart Stores | 29,950 | 1,678,997 | ||
Walt Disney | 57,300 | 1,300,137 | ||
Yum! Brands | 30,000 | 945,000 | ||
11,032,714 | ||||
Consumer Staples—10.6% | ||||
Colgate-Palmolive | 11,600 | 795,064 | ||
PepsiCo | 27,600 | 1,511,652 | ||
Philip Morris International | 48,200 | 2,097,182 | ||
Procter & Gamble | 19,350 | 1,196,217 | ||
Safeway | 59,200 | 1,407,184 | ||
SYSCO | 43,850 | 1,005,919 | ||
8,013,218 | ||||
Energy—5.6% | ||||
Devon Energy | 10,420 | 684,698 | ||
Halliburton | 37,900 | 689,022 | ||
Schlumberger | 14,300 | 605,319 | ||
Southwestern Energy | 30,100 a | 871,997 | ||
Weatherford International | 50,000 a | 541,000 | ||
Williams | 54,800 | 793,504 | ||
4,185,540 |
The Fund 9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Financial Services—6.9% | ||||
American Express | 27,275 | 505,951 | ||
Ameriprise Financial | 37,950 | 886,512 | ||
Digital Realty Trust | 30,220 | 992,727 | ||
Goldman Sachs Group | 11,510 | 971,329 | ||
Invesco | 56,950 | 822,358 | ||
MasterCard, Cl. A | 2,400 | 343,032 | ||
Visa, Cl. A | 12,350 | 647,757 | ||
5,169,666 | ||||
Health Care—19.0% | ||||
Abbott Laboratories | 35,650 | 1,902,640 | ||
C.R. Bard | 13,400 | 1,129,084 | ||
Cardinal Health | 20,600 | 710,082 | ||
Celgene | 24,800 a | 1,370,944 | ||
Cephalon | 19,150 a | 1,475,316 | ||
Gilead Sciences | 24,100 a | 1,232,474 | ||
Johnson & Johnson | 20,700 | 1,238,481 | ||
Medtronic | 26,200 | 823,204 | ||
Merck & Co. | 44,400 | 1,349,760 | ||
Pharmaceutical Product Development | 27,550 | 799,226 | ||
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, ADR | 33,500 | 1,426,095 | ||
Thermo Fisher Scientific | 25,300 a | 861,971 | ||
14,319,277 | ||||
Information Technology—3.4% | ||||
Google, Cl. A | 5,580 a | 1,716,687 | ||
Taiwan Semiconductor | ||||
Manufacturing, ADR | 104,800 | 827,920 | ||
2,544,607 | ||||
Integrated Oil & Gas—2.9% | ||||
Chevron | 11,200 | 828,464 | ||
Occidental Petroleum | 22,950 | 1,376,771 | ||
2,205,235 |
10
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Materials & Processing—2.6% | ||||
Monsanto | 11,400 | 801,990 | ||
Praxair | 19,400 | 1,151,584 | ||
1,953,574 | ||||
Producer Durables—10.8% | ||||
Boeing | 16,400 | 699,788 | ||
Caterpillar | 22,350 | 998,375 | ||
Danaher | 16,400 | 928,404 | ||
Eaton | 15,300 | 760,563 | ||
Emerson Electric | 39,750 | 1,455,248 | ||
Honeywell International | 45,500 | 1,493,765 | ||
Textron | 32,600 | 452,162 | ||
United Technologies | 25,200 | 1,350,720 | ||
8,139,025 | ||||
Technology—18.5% | ||||
Akamai Technologies | 52,450 a | 791,470 | ||
Apple | 25,300 a | 2,159,355 | ||
Broadcom, Cl. A | 43,500 a | 738,195 | ||
Cisco Systems | 89,100 a | 1,452,330 | ||
Corning | 107,600 | 1,025,428 | ||
Hewlett-Packard | 44,400 | 1,611,276 | ||
Intel | 69,550 | 1,019,603 | ||
Microchip Technology | 45,200 | 882,756 | ||
Microsoft | 49,250 | 957,420 | ||
Oracle | 91,350 a | 1,619,636 | ||
QUALCOMM | 47,070 | 1,686,518 | ||
13,943,987 | ||||
Utilities—1.3% | ||||
Questar | 30,500 | 997,045 | ||
Total Common Stocks | ||||
(cost $96,529,119) | 74,437,138 |
The Fund 11
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Other Investment—2.4% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Registered Investment Company; | ||||
Dreyfus Institutional Preferred | ||||
Plus Money Market Fund | ||||
(cost $1,774,000) | 1,774,000 b | 1,774,000 | ||
Total Investments (cost $98,303,119) | 101.2% | 76,211,138 | ||
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | (1.2%) | (893,004) | ||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 75,318,134 |
ADR—American Depository Receipts |
a | Non-income producing security. |
b | Investment in affiliated money market mutual fund. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | ||||||
Value (%) | Value (%) | |||||
Health Care | 19.0 | Information Technology | 3.4 | |||
Technology | 18.5 | Integrated Oil & Gas | 2.9 | |||
Consumer Discretionary | 14.6 | Autos & Transports | 2.6 | |||
Producer Durables | 10.8 | Materials & Processing | 2.6 | |||
Consumer Staples | 10.6 | Money Market Investment | 2.4 | |||
Financial Services | 6.9 | Utilities | 1.3 | |||
Energy | 5.6 | 101.2 | ||||
† Based on net assets. | ||||||
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2008
Cost | Value | |||||||
Assets ($): | ||||||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments: | ||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 96,529,119 | 74,437,138 | ||||||
Affiliated issuers | 1,774,000 | 1,774,000 | ||||||
Cash | 227,693 | |||||||
Dividends and interest receivable | 168,072 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses | 13,512 | |||||||
76,620,415 | ||||||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 58,374 | |||||||
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | 1,185,916 | |||||||
Interest payable—Note 2 | 40 | |||||||
Accrued expenses | 57,951 | |||||||
1,302,281 | ||||||||
Net Assets ($) | 75,318,134 | |||||||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||||||
Paid-in capital | 109,188,165 | |||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (11,778,050) | |||||||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | ||||||||
(depreciation) on investments | (22,091,981) | |||||||
Net Assets ($) | 75,318,134 | |||||||
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Net Assets ($) | 6,935 | 12,019 | 75,292,268 | 6,912 | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 1,577 | 2,712 | 16,940,635 | 1,558 | ||||
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 4.40 | 4.43 | 4.44 | 4.44 | ||||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 13
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2008 | ||
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends (net of $2,846 foreign taxes withheld at source): | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 1,642,809 | |
Affiliated issuers | 10,257 | |
Income from securities lending | 50,853 | |
Total Income | 1,703,919 | |
Expenses: | ||
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 731,260 | |
Administration fee—Note 3(a) | 92,125 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 63,317 | |
Professional fees | 35,373 | |
Registration fees | 27,152 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 16,831 | |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 15,724 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 13,313 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 6,304 | |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 40 | |
Miscellaneous | 20,318 | |
Total Expenses | 1,021,757 | |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertakings—Note 3(a) | (24,346) | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 1(b) | (306) | |
Net Expenses | 997,105 | |
Investment Income—Net | 706,814 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (11,705,521) | |
Net realized gain (loss) on options transactions | 74,782 | |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | (11,630,739) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (48,045,034) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | (59,675,773) | |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (58,968,959) | |
See notes to financial statements. |
14
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 706,814 | 475,549 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (11,630,739) | 16,281,070 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | (48,045,034) | 6,892,154 | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | (58,968,959) | 23,648,773 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A Shares | (6,011) | (3,870) | ||
Class I Shares | (416,756) | (500,113) | ||
Net realized gain on investments: | ||||
Class A Shares | (166,865) | (422,159) | ||
Class I Shares | (5,656,873) | (14,074,151) | ||
Return of capital: | ||||
Class A Shares | (40,721) | — | ||
Class I Shares | (1,382,054) | — | ||
Total Dividends | (7,669,280) | (15,000,293) | ||
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 272,273 | 115,951 | ||
Class C Shares | 15,000 | — | ||
Class I Shares | 120,594,149 | 13,334,640 | ||
Class T Shares | 10,000 | — | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A Shares | 205,312 | 421,638 | ||
Class I Shares | 6,753,059 | 13,444,609 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (3,512,087) | (2,168,656) | ||
Class I Shares | (125,236,889) | (39,906,811) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
from Capital Stock Transactions | (899,183) | (14,758,629) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (67,537,422) | (6,110,149) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 142,855,556 | 148,965,705 | ||
End of Period | 75,318,134 | 142,855,556 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | — | 3,626 |
The Fund 15
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 34,544 | 14,148 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 32,538 | 51,206 | ||
Shares redeemed | (574,751) | (274,217) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (507,669) | (208,863) | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 2,712 | — | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 17,019,698 | 1,643,342 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 1,056,817 | 1,612,966 | ||
Shares redeemed | (18,061,289) | (4,916,371) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 15,226 | (1,660,063) | ||
Class T | ||||
Shares sold | 1,558 | — |
a | The fund commenced offering four Classes of shares on the close of business September 12, 2008.The existing shares were redesignated and the fund added Class C and Class T shares. |
b | Represents information for the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund, through September 12, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund’s Class A and Class I shares represents the financial highlights of the Class A and Institutional shares, respectively, of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund (“Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Class A and Class I shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Class A and Class I shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions. These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Class A Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 8.10 | 7.64 | 7.65 | 9.52 | 9.43 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income (loss)—neta | .02 | .01 | .00b | (.01) | .06 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (3.28) | 1.35 | .44 | (.01) | .24 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | (3.26) | 1.36 | .44 | (.02) | .30 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.01) | (.01) | (.00)b | — | (.06) | |||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||
gain on investments | (.35) | (.89) | (.45) | (1.85) | (.15) | |||||
Return of capital | (.08) | — | — | — | — | |||||
Total Distributions | (.44) | (.90) | (.45) | (1.85) | (.21) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 4.40 | 8.10 | 7.64 | 7.65 | 9.52 | |||||
Total Return (%)c | (41.90) | 17.79 | 6.04 | (.13) | 3.31 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.11 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.10d | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.08 | 1.11 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
(loss) to average net assets | .20 | .10 | .06 | (.06) | .60 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 78 | 52 | 51 | 101 | 90 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 7 | 4,127 | 5,487 | 8,126 | 10,758 |
- Represents information for Class A shares of the fund’s predecessor, Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund, through September 12, 2008.
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Expense waivers and/or reimbursements amounted to less than .01%. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 17
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued) |
Year Ended | ||
Class C Shares | December 31, 2008a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 6.42 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—netb | .00c | |
Net realized and unrealized | ||
gain (loss) on investments | (1.99) | |
Total from Investment Operations | (1.99) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 4.43 | |
Total Return (%)d | (31.00)e | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.01f | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.91f | |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | .04f | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 78 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 12 |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
d | Exclusive of sales charge. |
e | Not annualized. |
f | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Class I Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 8.20 | 7.72 | 7.73 | 9.60 | 9.50 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—neta | .04 | .03 | .02 | .02 | .09 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (3.34) | 1.37 | .45 | (.02) | .25 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | (3.30) | 1.40 | .47 | — | .34 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.03) | (.03) | (.03) | (.02) | (.09) | |||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||
gain on investments | (.35) | (.89) | (.45) | (1.85) | (.15) | |||||
Return of capital | (.08) | — | — | — | — | |||||
Total Distributions | (.46) | (.92) | (.48) | (1.87) | (.24) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 4.44 | 8.20 | 7.72 | 7.73 | 9.60 | |||||
Total Return (%) | (42.03) | 18.18 | 6.29 | .07 | 3.63 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .86 | .85 | .84 | .82 | .85 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .84 | .85 | .84 | .82 | .85 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .61 | .34 | .30 | .19 | .91 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 78 | 52 | 51 | 101 | 90 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 75,292 | 138,729 | 143,479 | 205,786 | 336,716 |
- Represents information for Institutional shares of the fund’s predecessor, Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund through September 12, 2008.
a Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 19
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued) |
Year Ended | ||
Class T Shares | December 31, 2008a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 6.42 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—netb | .01 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | (1.99) | |
Total from Investment Operations | (1.98) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 4.44 | |
Total Return (%)c | (30.84)d | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.60e | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.43e | |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | .38e | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 78 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 7 |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
20
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”, which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering nine series, including the fund.The fund’s investment objective is long-term capital appreciation. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by the fund’s Board of Directors, all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund, a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, were transferred to the fund in exchange for corresponding class of shares of Common Stock of the fund of equal value. Shareholders of Class A and Institutional shares of Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund received Class A and Class I shares of the fund, respectively, in each case in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund at the time of the exchange. On the date of the exchange, the fund created Class C and Class T shares.The net asset value of the fund’s shares on the close of business September 12, 2008, after the reorganization was $6.34 for Class A shares and $6.42 for Class I shares, and a total of 519,680 Class A shares and 17,637,789 Class I shares, representing net assets of $116,491,577 (including $625,077 net unrealized appreciation on investments) were issued to shareholders of Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund shareholders in the exchange. The exchange was a tax-free event to shareholders of the fund. Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund is the accounting survivor and its historical performance is presented for periods through September 12, 2008.
At a meeting of the fund’s Board of Directors held on July 10, 2008, the Board approved, effective December 1, 2008, a proposal to change the name of the fund from “Dreyfus Premier Large Cap Growth Fund” to “Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund”.
The Fund 21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
Effective July 1, 2008, BNY Mellon reorganized and consolidated a number of its banking and trust company subsidiaries.As a result of the reorganization, any services previously provided to the fund by Mellon Bank, N.A. or Mellon Trust of New England, N.A. are now provided by The Bank of NewYork Mellon (formerly,The Bank of NewYork).
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares. The fund is authorized to issue 50 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C and Class T and 100 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock of Class I. Class A and Class T shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class I shares are sold at net asset value per share only to institutional investors. Effective December 3, 2008, investments for new accounts were no longer permitted in Class T of the fund, except that participants in certain group retirement plans were able to open a new account in Class T of the fund, provided that the fund was established as an investment option under the plans before December 3, 2008. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
22
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The Fund 23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
The fund adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “FairValue Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes an authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to FAS 157.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the fund’s investments carried at fair value:
Investments in | Other Financial | |||
Valuation Inputs | Securities ($) | Instruments ($)† | ||
Level 1—Quoted Prices | 76,211,138 | 0 | ||
Level 2—Other Significant | ||||
Observable Inputs | 0 | 0 | ||
Level 3—Significant | ||||
Unobservable Inputs | 0 | 0 | ||
Total | 76,211,138 | 0 |
- Other financial instruments include derivative instruments, such as futures, forward currency exchange contracts and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument and written options contracts which are shown at value.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
24
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management banks whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement withThe Bank of NewYork Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of, or loss of rights in, the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended December 12, 2008, The Bank of NewYork Mellon earned a fee, payable monthly equal to seven basis points (.07%) of the weighted average daily market value of the securities loaned by the fund during the preceding calendar month. This agreement was terminated as of the close of business, on September 12, 2008, due to the reorganization.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by the Manager are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized
The Fund 25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund did not have any liabilities for any unrecognized tax positions. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the four-year period ended December 31, 2008 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
At December 31, 2008, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows: accumulated capital losses $5,003,788 and unrealized depreciation $22,380,177. In addition, the fund had $6,486,066 of capital losses realized after October 31, 2008, which were deferred for tax purposes to the first day of the following fiscal year.
The accumulated capital loss carryover is available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net securities profits, if any, realized subsequent to December 31, 2008. If not applied, the carryover expires in fiscal 2016.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows: ordinary income $693,564 and $1,235,014, long-term capital gains $5,552,941 and $13,765,279 and return of capital $1,422,775 and $0, respectively.
26
During the period ended December 31, 2008, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to the tax treatment for real estate investment trusts and return of capital distribution, the fund decreased accumulated undistributed investment income-net by $287,673, increased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments by $1,710,447 and decreased paid-in capital by $1,422,774. Net assets and net asset value per share were not affected by this reclassification.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
Effective October 15, 2008, the fund participates with other Dreyfus managed funds in a $145 million redemption credit facility (the “Facility”) to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing.
The average daily amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facility during the period ended December 31, 2008, was approximately $2,900 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.39% .
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a Management Agreement (“Agreement”) with the Manager, effective September 13, 2008, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .70% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. Prior to September 12, 2008, The Bank of NewYork (the “Advisor”) was the advisor for Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund.The Advisor’s fee was computed at an annual rate of .60% of the value of Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund’s average daily net assets and was payable monthly. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor and Manager earned $552,748 and $178,512, respectively.
The Fund 27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
The Manager has contractually agreed, until September 30, 2010, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class I shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .87%.
The Manager has agreed, from September 24, 2008 until May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder services fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.00% .
The Manager has agreed, until May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class C and Class T (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder service fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.00% .
The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertakings, amounted to $24,346 during the period ended December 31, 2008.
The Bank of New York Mellon served as Administrator to Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund pursuant to an Administration Agreement. The Administrator received from Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund a monthly fee equal to an annual rate of .10% of the average daily net asset of Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund. The administration fees amounted to $92,125 for the period ended September 12, 2008.This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, due to the reorganization.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .75% and .25% of the value of their respective average daily net assets. During the period September 13, 2008 through December 31, 2008, Class C and Class T shares were charged $20 and $6, respectively, pursuant to the Plan.
28
Under the prior Distribution Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class A shares paid BNY Hamilton Distributors, Inc. for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .25% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class A. During the period January 1, 2008 through September 12, 2008, Class A shares were charged $6,278.This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of ..25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services.The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period September 13, 2008 through December 31, 2008, Class A, Class C and Class T shares were charged $265, $7, and $6, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates DreyfusTransfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period September 13,2008 through December 31,2008,the fund was charged $2,529 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $306 pursuant to the cash management agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During
The Fund 29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $16,831 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $1,197 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $49,338, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $9, shareholder services plan fees $5, custodian fees $6,600, chief compliance officer fees $1,197 and transfer agency per account fees $1,225.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and options transactions, during the period ended December 31, 2008, amounted to $90,746,718 and $98,244,520, respectively.
The fund may purchase and write (sell) put and call options in order to gain exposure to or to protect against changes in the market.
As a writer of call options, the fund receives a premium at the outset and then bears the market risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the financial instrument underlying the option. Generally, the fund would incur a gain, to the extent of the premium, if the price of the underlying financial instrument decreases between the date the option is written and the date on which the option is terminated. Generally, the fund would realize a loss, if the price of the financial instrument increases between those dates.
As a writer of put options, the fund receives a premium at the outset and then bears the market risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the financial instrument underlying the option. Generally, the
30
fund would incur a gain, to the extent of the premium, if the price of the underlying financial instrument increases between the date the option is written and the date on which the option is terminated. Generally, the fund would realize a loss, if the price of the financial instrument decreases between those dates.
The following summarizes the fund’s call/put options written for the period ended December 31, 2008:
Options Terminated | ||||||||
Number of | Premiums | Net Realized | ||||||
Options Written: | Contracts | Received ($) | Cost ($) | Gain ($) | ||||
Contracts outstanding | ||||||||
December 31, 2007 | — | — | ||||||
Contracts written | 388 | 207,577 | ||||||
Contracts terminated: | ||||||||
Contracts expired | 388 | 207,577 | 132,795 | 74,782 | ||||
Contracts Outstanding | ||||||||
December 31, 2008 | — | — |
At December 31, 2008, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $98,591,315; accordingly, accumulated net unrealized depreciation on investments was $22,380,177, consisting of $2,317,721 gross unrealized appreciation and $24,697,898 gross unrealized depreciation.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The application of FAS 161 is required for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements and the accompanying notes has not yet been determined.
The Fund 31
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
NOTE 5—Subsequent Event:
On February 4, 2009, the fund issued to each holder of its Class T shares, in exchange for said shares, Class A shares of the fund having an aggregate net asset value equal to the aggregate net asset value of the shareholder’s Class T shares. Subsequent investments in the fund’s Class A shares made by prior holders of the fund’s Class T shares who received Class A shares of the fund in exchange for their Class T shares are subject to the front-end sales load schedule currently in effect for Class T shares at the time of the exchange. Otherwise, all other Class A share attributes will be in effect.
32
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund |
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the statement of investments, of Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund (one of the series comprising Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc.) as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets for the year then ended and financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31,2004.These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The statement of changes in net assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the financial highlights for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were audited by other auditors whose report dated February 28, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on such statement of changes in net assets and financial highlights.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2008 by correspondence with the custodian and others.We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above and audited by us present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Large Cap Growth Fund at December 31, 2008, the results of its operations and the changes in its net assets for the year then ended and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
New York, New York |
February 25, 2009 |
The Fund 33
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
For federal tax purposes, the fund hereby designates 100% of the ordinary dividends paid during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as qualifying for the corporate dividends received deduction. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, certain dividends paid by the fund may be subject to a maximum tax rate of 15%, as provided for by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. Of the distributions paid during the fiscal year, $693,564 represents the maximum amount that may be considered qualified dividend income. Shareholders will receive notification in January 2009 of the percentage applicable to the preparation of their 2008 income tax returns. Also the fund hereby designates $.3265 per share as a long-term capital gain distribution paid on September 11, 2008.
34
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
At the March 18, 2008, Board meeting, the Board members established the Fund as a separate series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), and authorized the Company, on behalf of the Fund, to enter into an agreement and plan of reorganization to acquire all of the assets and liabilities of BNY Hamilton Large Cap Growth Fund (the “BNY Fund”) in a tax-free reorganization in exchange for shares of the Fund and the assumption by the Fund of the BNY Fund’s stated liabilities. The Fund was established solely for the purpose of effecting the BNY Fund’s reorganization and, as a result, the Fund adopted the same or substantially similar investment objective and policies as the BNY Fund and expected to inherit the performance and financial records of the BNY Fund.
At the meeting, the Board considered the approval of, with respect to the Fund, the management agreement, between the Company and Dreyfus (the “Agreement”) through July 30, 2010.The Board members who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the Act) of the Company were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus.
Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services To Be Provided to the Fund. The Board members received a presentation from representatives of Dreyfus regarding services provided to the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and discussed the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided to the Fund pursuant to the Agreement. The Board members also referenced information provided and discussed at the meeting regarding the fund’s distribution of accounts, the relationships Dreyfus has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each, the diversity of distribution among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each of the funds’ distribution channels.
The Fund 35
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ research and portfolio management capabilities and that Dreyfus provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructure.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance, Management Fee, and Expense Ratio. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, the Board members were not able to review the Fund’s performance. The Board was advised, however, that the Fund was expected to inherit the BNY Fund’s performance record upon the closing of the reorganization. The Board members received a presentation from Dreyfus that described, among other matters, the BNY Fund’s average annual total returns for the various periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board discussed with the Dreyfus representatives the Fund’s investment objective and policies and portfolio management team, and noted that the team responsible for managing the BNY Fund will continue to manage the Fund.
The Board members reviewed the Fund’s proposed management fee and estimated expense ratio, and reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios of the funds in the Lipper Large-Cap Growth Funds category, the average and median management fees of the funds in that Lipper category and management fees of a subset of those funds.
The Board also noted that Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the Fund’s Class I and Class A shares so that the direct expenses of the Class I and Class A shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 0.85% and 1.12%, respectively. This expense undertaking will continue in effect for the Fund’s Class I shares for at least two years after the reorganization of the BNY Fund, and for the Fund’s Class A shares until such Class A shares received by holders of Class A shares of the BNY Fund are converted to Class I shares of the Fund.
36
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the fees paid to Dreyfus or its affiliates by mutual funds and/or separate accounts managed by Dreyfus with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the Fund (the “Similar Accounts”), and explained the nature of the Similar Accounts and the differences, from Dreyfus’ perspective, in providing services to the Similar Accounts as compared to the Fund.The Dreyfus representatives also reviewed the costs associated with distribution through intermediaries.The Board analyzed differences in fees paid to Dreyfus and its affiliates by the Similar Accounts and discussed the relationship of the advisory fee to be paid in light of the services to be provided by Dreyfus.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Accounts managed by Dreyfus, to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the Fund’s management fees. The Board acknowledged that differences in fees paid by the Similar Accounts seemed to be consistent with the services to be provided.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, Dreyfus’ representatives were not able to review the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus. The Board members were presented with a schedule of the estimated profitability of the Fund prepared by Dreyfus. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the unlikelihood of soft dollar arrangements in the future with respect to trading the Fund’s portfolio. The Board also considered whether the Fund would be able to participate in any economies of scale that Dreyfus may experience in the event that the Fund attracts a large amount of assets.The Board members noted the uncertainty of the estimated asset levels, and discussed the renewal requirements for advisory agreements and their ability to review the management fee annually after an initial term of the Agreement.
The Fund 37
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to approving the Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board made the following conclusions and determinations.
- The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the ser- vices to be provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
- The Board concluded that the fee to be paid by the Fund to Dreyfus was reasonable, in light of the services to be provided, comparative expense and advisory fee information, and benefits anticipated to be derived by Dreyfus from its relationship with the Fund.
- The Board determined that because the Fund had not commenced investment operations, economies of scale were not a factor and that, to the extent in the future it were to be determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the Fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the Fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that approval of the Agreement was in the best interests of the Fund.
38
NOTES
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured Not Bank-Guaranteed May Lose Value
Contents | ||
THE FUND | ||
2 | A Letter from the CEO | |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance | |
6 | Fund Performance | |
8 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses | |
8 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses | |
With Those of Other Funds | ||
9 | Statement of Investments | |
13 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities | |
14 | Statement of Operations | |
15 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets | |
17 | Financial Highlights | |
21 | Notes to Financial Statements | |
32 | Report of Independent Registered | |
Public Accounting Firm | ||
33 | Important Tax Information | |
34 | Information About the Review and Approval | |
of the Fund’s Management Agreement | ||
38 | Board Members Information | |
41 | Officers of the Fund | |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | ||
Back Cover |
The Fund
Dreyfus |
Large Cap Value Fund |
A LETTER FROM THE CEO Dear Shareholder: |
We present to you this annual report for Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund, covering the 12-month period from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008.
2008 was the most difficult year in decades for the economy and stock market.A credit crunch that originated in 2007 in the U.S. sub-prime mortgage market exploded in mid-2008 into a global financial crisis, resulting in the failures of major financial institutions, a deep and prolonged recession and lower investment values across a broad range of asset classes. Governments and regulators throughout the world moved aggressively to curtail the damage, implementing unprecedented reductions of short-term interest rates, massive injections of liquidity into the banking system, government bailouts of struggling companies and plans for massive economic stimulus programs.
Although we expect the U.S. and global economies to remain weak until longstanding imbalances have worked their way out of the system, the financial markets currently appear to have priced in investors’ generally low expectations. In previous recessions, however, the markets have tended to anticipate economic improvement before it occurs, potentially leading to major rallies when few expected them. That’s why it makes sense to remain disciplined, maintain a long-term perspective and adopt a consistent asset allocation strategy that reflects one’s future goals and attitudes toward risk. As always, we urge you to consult with your financial advisor, who can recommend the course of action that is right for you.
For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as market perspectives, we have provided a Discussion of Fund Performance given by the fund’s Portfolio Managers.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Jonathan R. Baum Chief Executive Officer The Dreyfus Corporation January 15, 2009 |
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2008, as provided by Julianne McHugh and Brian Ferguson, Co-Portfolio Managers
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2008, Dreyfus Large CapValue Fund’s Class A shares achieved a total return of –35.49% and Class I shares returned –35.40% ..1 In comparison, the S&P 500® Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of –37.00% for the same period.2 For the period of September 13, 2008, through December 31, 2008, Class C shares returned –26.19% and Class T shares returned –26.08% .1 The Index achieved a total return of –27.22% for the same period.2 The fund’s slight outperformance over the benchmark is largely attributable to our positions in individual stocks and sectors with significant defensive characteristics. Although these produced negative absolute returns, their losses were slightly smaller than those of the broader market.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks to provide long-term capital appreciation; its secondary goal is current income.To pursue these goals, the fund normally invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of large capitalization companies — those with market capitalizations of $5 billion or more at the time of purchase.The fund will invest primarily in equity securities of U.S. issuers, but may invest up to 20% of its assets in equity securities of foreign issuers, including those in emerging markets.
In choosing stocks, we focus on individual stock selection (a “bottom-up”approach) rather than forecasting stock market trends (a“top-down” approach), and look for value companies. To identify these stocks, we employ a three-step value screening process that seeks to identify the stocks of companies that are underpriced relative to their intrinsic worth or business prospects and which exhibit sound business fundamentals, and positive business momentum or a catalyst which may be the trigger for an improving stock price.
Positioned for a Challenging Environment
At the beginning of the year, there may have been some question about whether the U.S. economy would enter a recession, but as the year
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued) |
wore on, questions gave way to certainty. By the time confirmation came in December that the recession had been in place for a year, many were disappointed but few were surprised.
In a year that saw some of Wall Street’s longest-established, most respected names disappear or be subject to government takeover, an equity market slump was to be expected. Few could have anticipated stocks’ steep slide in the second half of the year, however, which brought the broad market indexes to 10-year lows. Investor and consumer confidence all but evaporated, freezing the credit markets and bringing economic activity to a seeming standstill.
Diverse Companies Contributed to Performance
In this very difficult environment, our defensive positioning both in terms of market sectors and individual stocks was helpful.Areas of the economy that were somewhat more resilient in the face of slowing economic activity included consumer staples and health care. Even though they produced double-digit negative returns for the year —showing that there was little room to hide during the period — their losses were much less severe than those seen in some of the harder-hit sectors, such as financials and materials. Among our consumer staples holdings showing relative strength were household-products giant Procter & Gamble, and discount retailer Wal-Mart Stores.
Another strong sector for the fund this year was energy.These stocks rose as commodity prices soared to record levels over the summer; although oil prices retreated in the year’s later months, stocks from this sector still held up relatively well for the year as a whole. Both our overweighting in the sector, and our individual selections within it, contributed positively to our 2008 results.Among our energy holdings was Chevron, an integrated energy name which performed defensively and continues to offer what we believe are relatively more attractive growth prospects and valuation.
We underweighted the technology sector, based on our view that deteriorating global demand for technology products and services from both companies and consumers could weaken earnings.The sector did endure a tough year,so this positioning contributed positively to our relative performance. In addition, our individual stock selections within the sector also performed well. Payroll processor Automatic Data Processing (ADP) was one of our strong stocks from the sector; the company benefited from the stable earnings and cash flows that result from the steady, recurring nature of its business.It too had a clean balance sheet with little debt, and it stands apart as one of very few companies to retain a AAA rating.
4
Because we manage the fund with a value perspective, we tend to have a larger weighting in financials than the S&P 500 benchmark. In this very troubled period for financials, this positioning hurt our results, though positive stock selection among more defensive companies in the sector helped to offset some of the damage. These included insurers Chubb and Aon, and diversified bank Wells Fargo & Co., one of the major banks to hold up reasonably well during the devastation in the late summer and autumn.
Our Outlook for the Year Ahead
We anticipate that the new Presidential administration and Congress will provide for continued economic stimulus in the coming year, with a particular emphasis on alleviating pressures in the housing market.We believe that this, along with lower energy prices, should help consumers. Nonetheless, the environment is likely to remain challenging in the months to come.To contend with this environment, we intend to continue to avoid companies with weak balance sheets — those that are highly leveraged, will need capital in the coming months, or hold assets that could be impaired.We have also lightened the fund’s exposure to companies that are exposed to slowing international markets, in favor of those that are focused on the U.S. economy.We believe the U.S. is further along the economic slowdown than markets abroad. Consistent with our bottom-up approach, our main focus will continue to be on companies’ fundamental qualities, business momentum, and valuations.
January 15, 2009
1 | The total return figures presented for Class A and I shares of the fund reflect the performance of BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund’s (the “predecessor fund”) Class A shares and Institutional shares, respectively, prior to 9/13/08. Performance for each share class includes returns for the predecessor fund (Class A and Class I only) and the current maximum sales load, and reflects current distribution and servicing fees in effect only since the reorganization date. |
Investors should consider, when deciding whether to purchase a particular class of shares, the investment amount, anticipated holding period and other relevant factors. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Share price and investment return fluctuate such that upon redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Return figures provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking in effect for Classes A, C, and T through May 1, 2009, and in effect for Class I through September 30, 2010, at which time it may be extended, terminated or modified. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the fund’s returns would have been lower. | |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital gain distributions.The Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index is a widely accepted, unmanaged index of U.S. stock market performance. |
The Fund 5
† Source: Lipper Inc.
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.
The above graph compares a $10,000 investment made in Class A and Class I shares of Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund on 4/28/00 (inception date) to a $10,000 investment made in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Stock Price Index (the “Index”) on that date. For comparative purposes, the value of the Index on 4/30/00 is used as the beginning value on 4/28/00. All dividends and capital gain distributions are reinvested.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, substantially all of the assets of another investment company advised by an affiliate of the fund’s investment adviser, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund (the “predecessor fund”), a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, Inc., were transferred to Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund in a tax-free reorganization.The predecessor fund has the same investment objective, policies, guidelines and restrictions as Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund. The performance of the fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T shares represent the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A and Institutional shares prior to the commencement of operations for Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund and the performance of Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund’s Class A, Class C, Class I and Class T shares thereafter.
The fund’s performance shown in the line graph takes into account the maximum initial sales charge on Class A shares and all other applicable fees and expenses.The Index is a widely accepted, unmanaged index of U.S. stock market performance. Unlike a mutual fund, the Index is not subject to charges, fees and other expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. Further information relating to fund performance, including expense reimbursements, if applicable, is contained in the Financial Highlights section of the prospectus and elsewhere in this report.
6
Average Annual Total Returns as of 12/31/08 | ||||||||
Inception | From | |||||||
Date | 1 Year | 5 Years | Inception | |||||
Class A shares | ||||||||
with maximum sales charge (5.75%) | 04/28/00 | (39.18)% | (2.36)% | (0.92)% | ||||
without sales charge | 04/28/00 | (35.49)% | (1.20)% | (0.24)% | ||||
Class C shares | ||||||||
with applicable redemption charge † | 09/13/08 | (36.55)%†† | (1.35)%†† | (0.33)%†† | ||||
without redemption | 09/13/08 | �� | (35.99)%†† | (1.35)%†† | (0.33)%†† | |||
Class I shares | 04/28/00 | (35.40)% | (0.99)% | (0.08)% | ||||
Class T shares | ||||||||
with applicable sales charge (4.5%) | 09/13/08 | (38.75)%†† | (2.22)%†† | (0.83)%†† | ||||
without sales charge | 09/13/08 | (35.89)%†† | (1.32)%†† | (0.31)%†† |
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.The fund’s performance shown in the graph and table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
- The maximum contingent deferred sales charge for Class C shares is 1% for shares redeemed within one year of the date of purchase.
- The total return performance figures presented for Class C and Class T shares of the fund reflect the performance of the predecessor fund’s Class A and Institutional shares for periods prior to 09/13/08 (the inception date for Class C and Class T shares), adjusted to reflect the fund’s applicable sales loads for those class shares and the applicable distribution/servicing fees thereafter.
The Fund |
7 |
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming actual returns for the six months ended December 31, 2008†
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000†† | $ 4.57 | $ 5.17 | $ 3.45 | $ 3.87 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $716.90 | $738.10 | $718.00 | $739.20 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended December 31, 2008
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000†††† | $ 5.38 | $ 10.03 | $ 4.06 | $ 7.51 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,019.81 | $1,015.18 | $1,021.11 | $1,017.70 |
† From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008 for Class C and Class T shares.
- Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.98% for Class C and 1.48% for Class T, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 110/366 (to reflect the actual days in the period). Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.06% for Class A shares and .80% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one- half year period).
- Please note that while the Class C and Class T shares commenced initial offering on September 13, 2008, the Hypothetical expenses paid during the period reflect projected activity for the full six month period for purposes of comparability.This projection assumes that annualized expense ratios were in effect during the period July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008.
- Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.06% for Class A, 1.98% for Class C, .80% for Class I and 1.48% for Class T, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
8
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS December 31, 2008 |
Common Stocks—99.9% | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Consumer Discretionary—8.0% | ||||
Carnival | 46,350 | 1,127,232 | ||
Gap | 60,830 | 814,514 | ||
Home Depot | 109,490 | 2,520,460 | ||
Johnson Controls | 43,180 | 784,149 | ||
Lowe’s Cos. | 50,070 | 1,077,506 | ||
McDonald’s | 13,200 | 820,908 | ||
News, Cl. A | 221,130 | 2,010,072 | ||
Omnicom Group | 52,360 | 1,409,531 | ||
Time Warner | 201,360 | 2,025,682 | ||
Toll Brothers | 34,640 a | 742,335 | ||
13,332,389 | ||||
Consumer Staples—13.1% | ||||
Cadbury, ADR | 37,092 | 1,323,072 | ||
Colgate-Palmolive | 19,310 | 1,323,507 | ||
CVS Caremark | 68,120 | 1,957,769 | ||
Estee Lauder, Cl. A | 28,530 | 883,289 | ||
Kraft Foods, Cl. A | 121,360 | 3,258,516 | ||
Molson Coors Brewing, Cl. B | 36,780 | 1,799,278 | ||
PepsiCo | 33,720 | 1,846,844 | ||
Philip Morris International | 80,190 | 3,489,067 | ||
Procter & Gamble | 36,710 | 2,269,412 | ||
Wal-Mart Stores | 52,800 | 2,959,968 | ||
Walgreen | 33,440 | 824,965 | ||
21,935,687 | ||||
Energy—15.9% | ||||
Anadarko Petroleum | 16,330 | 629,521 | ||
Chevron | 110,020 | 8,138,179 | ||
Devon Energy | 17,910 | 1,176,866 | ||
EOG Resources | 10,650 | 709,077 | ||
Exxon Mobil | 101,820 | 8,128,291 | ||
Hess | 16,050 | 860,922 | ||
Marathon Oil | 39,000 | 1,067,040 | ||
Occidental Petroleum | 47,400 | 2,843,526 | ||
Schlumberger | 16,880 | 714,530 | ||
XTO Energy | 66,960 | 2,361,679 | ||
26,629,631 |
The Fund 9
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Exchange Traded Funds—.5% | ||||
iShares Russell 1000 Value Index Fund | 17,140 | 848,773 | ||
Financial—22.4% | ||||
ACE | 31,370 | 1,660,100 | ||
Aflac | 20,740 | 950,722 | ||
Ameriprise Financial | 23,140 | 540,550 | ||
AON | 51,790 | 2,365,767 | ||
Bank of America | 222,410 | 3,131,533 | ||
Capital One Financial | 20,250 | 645,772 | ||
Chubb | 40,110 | 2,045,610 | ||
Fifth Third Bancorp | 69,340 | 572,748 | ||
Franklin Resources | 33,710 | 2,150,024 | ||
Goldman Sachs Group | 13,570 | 1,145,172 | ||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 208,850 | 6,585,041 | ||
Marsh & McLennan Cos. | 34,450 | 836,102 | ||
MetLife | 81,170 | 2,829,586 | ||
Moody’s | 32,510 | 653,126 | ||
Northern Trust | 29,140 | 1,519,360 | ||
PNC Financial Services Group | 52,110 | 2,553,390 | ||
Prudential Financial | 14,300 | 432,718 | ||
T. Rowe Price Group | 25,010 | 886,354 | ||
U.S. Bancorp | 74,680 | 1,867,747 | ||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 139,910 | 4,124,547 | ||
37,495,969 | ||||
Health Care—11.5% | ||||
Abbott Laboratories | 75,490 | 4,028,901 | ||
Amgen | 48,810 a | 2,818,777 | ||
Baxter International | 14,680 | 786,701 | ||
Covidien | 31,440 | 1,139,386 | ||
Merck & Co. | 58,220 | 1,769,888 | ||
Pfizer | 220,310 | 3,901,690 | ||
Thermo Fisher Scientific | 19,510 a | 664,706 | ||
Wyeth | 110,230 | 4,134,727 | ||
19,244,776 |
10
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Industrial—9.1% | ||||
Dover | 25,750 | 847,690 | ||
Eaton | 21,290 | 1,058,326 | ||
General Electric | 339,280 | 5,496,336 | ||
Honeywell International | 25,110 | 824,361 | ||
Lockheed Martin | 23,070 | 1,939,726 | ||
Raytheon | 25,310 | 1,291,822 | ||
Tyco International | 19,310 | 417,096 | ||
Union Pacific | 22,240 | 1,063,072 | ||
Waste Management | 71,100 | 2,356,254 | ||
15,294,683 | ||||
Information Technology—5.7% | ||||
Accenture, Cl. A | 44,930 | 1,473,255 | ||
Automatic Data Processing | 22,320 | 878,069 | ||
Cisco Systems | 126,620 a | 2,063,906 | ||
Hewlett-Packard | 17,400 | 631,446 | ||
Intel | 60,780 | 891,035 | ||
International Business Machines | 10,470 | 881,155 | ||
Microsoft | 44,740 | 869,746 | ||
Nokia, ADR | 68,230 | 1,064,388 | ||
QUALCOMM | 23,850 | 854,546 | ||
9,607,546 | ||||
Materials—1.9% | ||||
Air Products & Chemicals | 15,660 | 787,228 | ||
Dow Chemical | 42,920 | 647,663 | ||
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold | 36,600 | 894,504 | ||
International Paper | 64,640 | 762,752 | ||
3,092,147 | ||||
Telecommunication Services—4.9% | ||||
AT & T | 211,500 | 6,027,750 | ||
Verizon Communications | 61,470 | 2,083,833 | ||
8,111,583 | ||||
Utilities—6.9% | ||||
Entergy | 32,960 | 2,739,965 |
The Fund 11
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued) |
Common Stocks (continued) | Shares | Value ($) | ||
Utilities (continued) | ||||
Exelon | 49,410 | 2,747,690 | ||
FPL Group | 16,710 | 841,014 | ||
NRG Energy | 37,280 a | 869,742 | ||
PG & E | 22,780 | 881,814 | ||
Questar | 52,390 | 1,712,629 | ||
Southern | 45,640 | 1,688,680 | ||
11,481,534 | ||||
Total Investments (cost $220,244,483) | 99.9% | 167,074,718 | ||
Cash and Receivables (Net) | .1% | 176,395 | ||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 167,251,113 | ||
ADR—American Depository Receipts | ||||
a Non-income producing security. |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | ||||||
Value (%) | Value (%) | |||||
Financial | 22.4 | Utilities | 6.9 | |||
Energy | 15.9 | Information Technology | 5.7 | |||
Consumer Staples | 13.1 | Telecommunication Services | 4.9 | |||
Health Care | 11.5 | Materials | 1.9 | |||
Industrial | 9.1 | Exchange Traded Funds | .5 | |||
Consumer Discretionary | 8.0 | 99.9 | ||||
† Based on net assets. | ||||||
See notes to financial statements. |
12
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2008
Cost | Value | |||||||
Assets ($): | ||||||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | 220,244,483 167,074,718 | |||||||
Receivable for investment securities sold | 1,139,193 | |||||||
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | 609,288 | |||||||
Dividends and interest receivable | 397,975 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses | 13,783 | |||||||
169,234,957 | ||||||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 174,079 | |||||||
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | 256,221 | |||||||
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | 1,109,489 | |||||||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 333,220 | |||||||
Interest payable—Note 2 | 459 | |||||||
Accrued expenses | 110,376 | |||||||
1,983,844 | ||||||||
Net Assets ($) | 167,251,113 | |||||||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||||||
Paid-in capital | 237,743,843 | |||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (17,322,965) | |||||||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | ||||||||
(depreciation) on investments | (53,169,765) | |||||||
Net Assets ($) | 167,251,113 | |||||||
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||||||
Class A | Class C | Class I | Class T | |||||
Net Assets ($) | 84,848 | 7,379 | 167,151,496 | 7,390 | ||||
Shares Outstanding | 12,944 | 1,134 | 25,582,946 | 1,134 | ||||
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 6.56 | 6.51 | 6.53 | 6.52 | ||||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 13
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS | ||
Year Ended December 31, 2008 | ||
Investment Income ($): | ||
Income: | ||
Cash dividends (net of $23,202 foreign taxes withheld at source): | ||
Unaffiliated issuers | 6,645,869 | |
Affiliated issuers | 10,693 | |
Income from securities lending | 79,265 | |
Total Income | 6,735,827 | |
Expenses: | ||
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 1,582,581 | |
Administration fee—Note 3(a) | 198,696 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 95,396 | |
Custodian fees—Note 3(c) | 62,585 | |
Professional fees | 40,984 | |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 37,221 | |
Registration fees | 34,608 | |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 16,932 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 1,988 | |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 459 | |
Miscellaneous | 45,607 | |
Total Expenses | 2,117,057 | |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertakings—Note 3(a) | (81,692) | |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 1(b) | (124) | |
Net Expenses | 2,035,241 | |
Investment Income—Net | 4,700,586 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (10,798,000) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (96,659,901) | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | (107,457,901) | |
Net (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (102,757,315) | |
See notes to financial statements. |
14
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 4,700,586 | 8,211,442 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | (10,798,000) | 29,027,117 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | (96,659,901) | (12,463,909) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | (102,757,315) | 24,774,650 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A Shares | (10,966) | (26,067) | ||
Class I Shares | (3,308,880) | (8,158,140) | ||
Net realized gain on investments: | ||||
Class A Shares | (54,754) | (82,349) | ||
Class I Shares | (14,549,522) | (22,922,639) | ||
Return of capital: | ||||
Class A Shares | (48,122) | — | ||
Class I Shares | (12,787,316) | — | ||
Total Dividends | (30,759,560) | (31,189,195) | ||
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A Shares | 101,767 | 56,431 | ||
Class C Shares | 10,000 | — | ||
Class I Shares | 227,580,332 | 22,686,461 | ||
Class T Shares | 10,000 | — | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A Shares | 113,806 | 108,039 | ||
Class I Shares | 25,204,314 | 21,495,373 | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A Shares | (1,024,375) | (304,661) | ||
Class I Shares | (281,722,399) | (69,898,378) | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
from Capital Stock Transactions | (29,726,555) | (25,856,735) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | (163,243,430) | (32,271,280) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 330,494,543 | 362,765,823 | ||
End of Period | 167,251,113 | 330,494,543 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | — | 53,628 |
The Fund 15
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
2008a,b | 2007b | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class A | ||||
Shares sold | 14,326 | 4,584 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 12,702 | 9,207 | ||
Shares redeemed | (119,219) | (24,351) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (92,191) | (10,560) | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 1,134 | — | ||
Class I | ||||
Shares sold | 22,647,022 | 1,870,056 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 2,852,909 | 1,848,340 | ||
Shares redeemed | (28,535,382) | (5,702,339) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (3,035,451) | (1,983,943) | ||
Class T | ||||
Shares sold | 1,134 | — |
a | The fund commenced offering four classes of shares on the close of business September 12, 2008.The existing shares were redesignated and the fund added Class C and Class T shares. |
b | Represents information for the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund, through September 12, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements. |
16
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for the fund’s Class A and Class I shares represents the financial highlights of the Class A and Institutional Shares, respectively, of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund (“Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund”), before the fund commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of the fund’s Class A and Institutional shares thereafter. Before the fund commenced operations, all of the assets of the Hamilton Large CapValue Fund were transferred to the fund in exchange for Class A and Class I shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions. These figures have been derived from the fund’s and the fund’s predecessor’s financial statements.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Class A Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 11.55 | 11.85 | 11.24 | 10.81 | 10.03 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—neta | .15 | .25 | .18 | .15 | .15 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (3.93) | .56 | 1.53 | .76 | .77 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | (3.78) | .81 | 1.71 | .91 | .92 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.11) | (.26) | (.18) | (.14) | (.14) | |||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||
gain on investments | (.59) | (.85) | (.92) | (.34) | — | |||||
Return of capital | (.51) | — | — | — | — | |||||
Total Distributions | (1.21) | (1.11) | (1.10) | (.48) | (.14) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 6.56 | 11.55 | 11.85 | 11.24 | 10.81 | |||||
Total Return (%)b | (35.49) | 6.78 | 15.41 | 8.45 | 9.22 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.07 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.06 | 1.17 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.05 | 1.04 | 1.03 | 1.05 | 1.05 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.38 | 2.04 | 1.50 | 1.33 | 1.42 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 133 | 34 | 59 | 43 | 37 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 85 | 1,214 | 1,371 | 1,015 | 860 |
- Represents information for Class A shares of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund, through September 12, 2008.
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Exclusive of sales charge. |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 17
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued) |
Year Ended | ||
Class C Shares | December 31, 2008a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 8.82 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—netb | .03 | |
Net realized and unrealized | ||
gain (loss) on investments | (2.34) | |
Total from Investment Operations | (2.31) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 6.51 | |
Total Return (%)c | (26.19)d | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 2.09e | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.98e | |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | 1.39e | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 133 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 7 |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
18
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Class I Shares† | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 11.51 | 11.81 | 11.19 | 10.76 | 10.01 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—neta | .18 | .28 | .21 | .18 | .18 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | (3.93) | .56 | 1.54 | .76 | .73 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | (3.75) | .84 | 1.75 | .94 | .91 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.13) | (.29) | (.21) | (.17) | (.16) | |||||
Dividends from net realized | ||||||||||
gain on investments | (.59) | (.85) | (.92) | (.34) | — | |||||
Return of capital | (.51) | — | — | — | — | |||||
Total Distributions | (1.23) | (1.14) | (1.13) | (.51) | (.16) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 6.53 | 11.51 | 11.81 | 11.19 | 10.76 | |||||
Total Return (%) | (35.40) | 7.07 | 15.84 | 8.74 | 9.21 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .83 | .79 | .78 | .81 | .91 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .80 | .79 | .78 | .80 | .80 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.85 | 2.31 | 1.76 | 1.59 | 1.73 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 133 | 34 | 59 | 43 | 37 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 167,151 | 329,281 | 361,395 | 310,927 | 236,631 |
- Represents information for Institutional shares of the fund’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund, through September 12, 2008.
a Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. See notes to financial statements.
The Fund 19
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued) |
Year Ended | ||
Class T Shares | December 31, 2008a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 8.82 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—netb | .04 | |
Net realized and unrealized | ||
gain (loss) on investments | (2.34) | |
Total from Investment Operations | (2.30) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 6.52 | |
Total Return (%)c | (26.08)d | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | 1.59e | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | 1.48e | |
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | 1.89e | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 133 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 7 |
a | From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. |
d | Not annualized. |
e | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements. |
20
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Large CapValue Fund (the “fund”) is a separate diversified series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”, which is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as an open-end management investment company and operates as a series company currently offering nine series, including the fund. The fund’s investment objective is long-term capital appreciation. The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as the fund’s investment adviser.
As of the close of business on September 12, 2008, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by the fund’s Board of Directors, all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund, a series of BNY Hamilton Funds, were transferred to the Fund in exchange for corresponding class of shares of Common Stock of the fund of equal value. Shareholders of Class A and Institutional shares of Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund received Class A and Class I of the fund, respectively, in each case in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund at the time of the exchange. On the date of the exchange, the Fund created Class C and Class T shares. The net asset value of the fund’s shares on the close of business September 12, 2008, after the reorganization was $8.87 for Class A shares and $8.82 for Class I shares, and a total of 105,617 Class A shares and 27,677,001 Class I shares, representing net assets of $245,095,486 (including $17,022,950 net unrealized depreciation on investments) were issued to shareholders of Hamilton Large CapValue Fund shareholders in the exchange. The exchange was a tax-free event to shareholders of the fund. Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund is the accounting survivor and its historical performance is presented for periods through September 12, 2008.
At a meeting of the Board of Directors held on July 10, 2008, the Board approved, effective December 1, 2008, a proposal to change the name of the fund from “Dreyfus Premier Large Cap Value Fund” to “Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund”.
The Fund 21
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
Effective July 1, 2008, BNY Mellon reorganized and consolidated a number of its banking and trust company subsidiaries.As a result of the reorganization, any services previously provided to the fund by Mellon Bank, N.A. or Mellon Trust of New England, N.A. are now provided by The Bank of NewYork Mellon (formerly,The Bank of NewYork).
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares. The fund is authorized to issue 50 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class C and Class T and 100 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock of Class I. Class A and Class T shares are subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase, Class I shares are sold at net asset value per share only to institutional investors. Effective December 3, 2008, investments for new accounts were no longer permitted in Class T of the fund, except that participants in certain group retirement plans were able to open a new account in Class T of the fund, provided that the fund was established as an investment option under the plans before December 3, 2008. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class, the allocation of certain transfer agency costs and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The Company accounts separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
22
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange or national securities market on which such securities are primarily traded. Securities listed on the National Market System for which market quotations are available are valued at the official closing price or, if there is no official closing price that day, at the last sales price. Securities not listed on an exchange or the national securities market, or securities for which there were no transactions, are valued at the average of the most recent bid and asked prices, except for open short positions, where the asked price is used for valuation purposes. Bid price is used when no asked price is available. Registered investment companies that are not traded on an exchange are valued at their net asset value.When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded (for example, a foreign exchange or market), but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Fair valuing of securities may be determined with the assistance of a pricing service using calculations based on indices of domestic securities and other appropriate indicators, such as prices of relevant ADRs and futures contracts. For other securities that are fair valued by the Board of Directors, certain factors may be considered such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers.
The Fund 23
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
The fund adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “FairValue Measurements” (“FAS 157”). FAS 157 establishes an authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value, and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund's investments relating to FAS 157. These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2008 in valuing the fund's investments carried at fair value:
Investments in | Other Financial | |||
Valuation Inputs | Securities ($) | Instruments ($)† | ||
Level 1—Quoted Prices | 167,074,718 | 0 | ||
Level 2—Other Significant | ||||
Observable Inputs | 0 | 0 | ||
Level 3—Significant | ||||
Unobservable Inputs | 0 | 0 | ||
Total | 167,074,718 | 0 |
† Other financial instruments include derivative instruments, such as futures, forward currency exchange |
contracts, and swap contracts, which are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the |
instrument and written options contracts which are shown at value. |
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income, including, where applicable, accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is recognized on the accrual basis.
24
The fund has arrangements with the custodian and cash management banks whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody and cash management fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
Pursuant to a securities lending agreement with The Bank of NewYork Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, the fund may lend securities to qualified institutions. It is the fund’s policy that, at origination, all loans are secured by collateral of at least 102% of the value of U.S. securities loaned and 105% of the value of foreign securities loaned. Collateral equivalent to at least 100% of the market value of securities on loan is maintained at all times. Collateral is either in the form of cash, which can be invested in certain money market mutual funds managed by the Manager, U.S. Government and Agency securities or letters of credit.The fund is entitled to receive all income on securities loaned, in addition to income earned as a result of the lending transaction. Although each security loaned is fully collateralized, the fund bears the risk of delay in recovery of,or loss of rights in,the securities loaned should a borrower fail to return the securities in a timely manner. During the period ended September 12,2008,The Bank of NewYork Mellon earned a fee, payable monthly equal to seven basis points (.07%) of the weighted average daily market value of the securities loaned by the fund during the preceding calendar month.This agreement was terminated as of the close of business, on September 12, 2008, due to the reorganization.
(c) Affiliated issuers: Investments in other investment companies advised by the Manager are defined as “affiliated” in the Act.
(d) Dividends to shareholders: Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Dividends from investment income-net and dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of
The Fund 25
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund did not have any liabilities for any unrecognized tax positions. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the four-year period ended December 31, 2008 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
At December 31, 2008, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows: unrealized depreciation $54,810,907. In addition, the fund had $15,681,823 of capital losses realized after October 31, 2008, which were deferred for tax purposes to the first day of the following fiscal year.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows: ordinary income $4,754,214 and $10,863,679, long-term capital gains $13,169,908 and $20,325,516 and return of capital $12,835,438 and $0, respectively.
During the period ended December 31, 2008, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to the tax treatment for dividend reclassification and return of capital distribution, the fund decreased
26
accumulated undistributed investment income-net by $1,434,368, increased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments by $14,269,806 and decreased paid-in capital by $12,835,438. Net assets and net asset value per share were not affected by this reclassification.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
Effective October 15, 2008, the fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $145 million redemption credit facility (the “Facility”) to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowing.
The average daily amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facility during the period ended December 31, 2008, was approximately $32,100 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.43% .
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a Management Agreement (“Agreement”) with the Manager, the management fee is computed at an annual rate of .70% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. Prior to September 12, 2008, The Bank of New York (the “Advisor”) was the advisor for Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund.The advisor’s fee was computed at an annuaal rate of .60% of the value of Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund’s average daily net assets and was payable monthly. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the Advisor and Manager earned $1,192,176 and $390,405, respectively.
The Fund 27
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
Dreyfus has contractually agreed, until September 30, 2010, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class I shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .80%.
Dreyfus has agreed, effective September 24, 2008 until May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class A (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder services fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.00% .
Dreyfus has agreed, until May 1, 2009, to waive receipt of its fee and/or assume the expenses of the fund so that the direct expenses of Class C and Class T (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings, extraordinary expenses, shareholder service fees and Rule 12b-1 fees) do not exceed 1.00% .
The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertakings amounted to $81,692 during the period ended December 31, 2008.
The Bank of New York served as Administrator to Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund pursuant to an Administration Agreement. The Administrator received from Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund a monthly fee equal to an annual rate of .10% of the average daily net asset of Hamilton Large Cap Value Fund. Administration fees amounted to $198,696 for the period ended September 12, 2008.This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, due to the reorganization.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the “Plan”) adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .75% and .25% of the value of their respective average daily net assets. During the period ended December 31, 2008, Class C and Class T shares were charged $17 and $6, respectively, pursuant to the Plan.
28
Under the prior Distribution Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class A shares paid BNY Hamilton Distributors, Inc. for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .25% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class A. During the period January 1, 2008 through September 12, 2008, Class A shares were charged $1,965.This agreement was terminated as of the close of business on September 12, 2008.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A, Class C and Class T shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of ..25% of the value of their average daily net assets for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services.The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended December 31, 2008, Class A, Class C and Class T shares were charged $2,046, $6, and $6, respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $9,965 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.
The fund compensates The Bank of NewYork Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $124 pursuant to the cash management agreement.
The Fund 29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued) |
The fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $62,585 pursuant to the custody agreement.
During the period ended December 31, 2008, the fund was charged $1,197 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $144,333, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $6, shareholder services plan fees $15, custodian fees $28,000, chief compliance officer fees $1,197 and transfer agency per account fees $528.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended December 31, 2008, amounted to $341,741,178 and $396,238,964, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $221,885,625; accordingly, accumulated net unrealized depreciation on investments was $54,810,907, consisting of $1,585,251 gross unrealized appreciation and $56,396,158 gross unrealized depreciation.
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“FAS 161”). FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies
30
for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The application of FAS 161 is required for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008.At this time, management is evaluating the implications of FAS 161 and its impact on the financial statements and the accompanying notes has not yet been determined.
NOTE 5—Subsequent Event:
On February 4, 2009, the fund issued to each holder of its ClassT shares, in exchange for said shares, Class A shares of the fund having an aggregate net asset value equal to the aggregate net asset value of the shareholder’s Class T shares. Subsequent investments in the fund’s Class A shares made by prior holders of the fund’s ClassT shares who received Class A shares of the fund in exchange for their Class T shares are subject to the front-end sales load schedule that was in effect for Class T shares at the time of the exchange. Otherwise, all other Class A share attributes will be in effect.
The Fund 31
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund |
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the statement of investments, of Dreyfus Large CapValue Fund (one of the series comprising Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc.) as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations and changes in net assets for the year then ended and financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31, 2004.These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The statement of changes in net assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the financial highlights for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were audited by other auditors whose report dated February 28, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion on such statement of changes in net assets and financial highlights.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2008 by correspondence with the custodian and others.We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above and audited by us present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Large Cap Value Fund at December 31, 2008, and the results of its operations and the changes in its net assets for the year then ended and the financial highlights for the year then ended and for the year ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
For federal tax purposes, the fund hereby designates 100% of the ordinary dividends paid during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as qualifying for the corporate dividends received deduction. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, certain dividends paid by the fund may be subject to a maximum tax rate of 15%, as provided for by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003. Of the distributions paid during the fiscal year, $4,754,214 represents the maximum amount that may be considered qualified dividend income. Shareholders will receive notification in January 2009 of the percentage applicable to the preparation of their 2008 income tax returns. Also the fund hereby designates $0.5272 per share as a long-term capital gain distribution paid on September 11, 2008.
The Fund 33
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
At the March 18, 2008, Board meeting, the Board members established the Fund as a separate series of Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc. (the “Company”), and authorized the Company, on behalf of the Fund, to enter into an agreement and plan of reorganization to acquire all of the assets and liabilities of BNY Hamilton Large CapValue Fund (the “BNY Fund”) in a tax-free reorganization in exchange for shares of the Fund and the assumption by the Fund of the BNY Fund’s stated liabilities.The Fund was established solely for the purpose of effecting the BNY Fund’s reorganization and, as a result, the Fund adopted the same or substantially similar investment objective and policies as the BNY Fund and expected to inherit the performance and financial records of the BNY Fund.
At the meeting, the Board considered the approval of, with respect to the Fund, the management agreement, between the Company and Dreyfus (the “Agreement”) through July 30, 2010.The Board members who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the Act) of the Company were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from representatives of Dreyfus.
Analysis of Nature, Extent and Quality of Services To Be Provided to the Fund. The Board members received a presentation from representatives of Dreyfus regarding services provided to the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and discussed the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided to the Fund pursuant to the Agreement. The Board members also referenced information provided and discussed at the meeting regarding the fund’s distribution of accounts, the relationships Dreyfus has with various intermediaries and the different needs of each, the diversity of distribution among the funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each of the funds’ distribution channels.
The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ research and portfolio management capabilities and that Dreyfus provides oversight of day-
34
to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements.The Board members also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting and compliance infrastructure.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance, Management Fee, and Expense Ratio. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, the Board members were not able to review the Fund’s performance. The Board was advised, however, that the Fund was expected to inherit the BNY Fund’s performance record upon the closing of the reorganization. The Board members received a presentation from Dreyfus that described, among other matters, the BNY Fund’s average annual total returns for the various periods ended December 31, 2007. The Board discussed with the Dreyfus representatives the Fund’s investment objective and policies and portfolio management team, and noted that the team responsible for managing the BNY Fund will continue to manage the Fund.
The Board members reviewed the Fund’s proposed management fee and estimated expense ratio, and reviewed the range of management fees and expense ratios of the funds in the Lipper Large-Cap Value Funds category, the average and median management fees of the funds in that Lipper category and management fees of a subset of those funds.
The Board also noted that Dreyfus has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the Fund’s Class I and Class A shares so that the direct expenses of the Class I and Class A shares (excluding taxes, interest, brokerage commissions, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed 0.79% and 1.05%, respectively. This expense undertaking will continue in effect for the Fund’s Class I shares for at least two years after the reorganization of the BNY Fund, and for the Fund’s Class A shares until such Class A shares received by holders of Class A shares of the BNY Fund are converted to Class I shares of the Fund.
The Fund 35
INFORMATION ABOUT THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
Representatives of Dreyfus reviewed with the Board members the fees paid to Dreyfus or its affiliates by mutual funds and/or separate accounts managed by Dreyfus with similar investment objectives, policies and strategies as the Fund (the “Similar Accounts”), and explained the nature of the Similar Accounts and the differences, from Dreyfus’ perspective, in providing services to the Similar Accounts as compared to the Fund.The Dreyfus representatives also reviewed the costs associated with distribution through intermediaries. The Board analyzed differences in fees paid to Dreyfus and its affiliates by the Similar Accounts and discussed the relationship of the advisory fee to be paid in light of the services to be provided by Dreyfus.The Board members considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Accounts managed by Dreyfus, to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the Fund’s management fees. The Board acknowledged that differences in fees paid by the Similar Accounts seemed to be consistent with the services to be provided.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. As the Fund had not yet commenced operations, Dreyfus’ representatives were not able to review the dollar amount of expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus. The Board members were presented with a schedule of the estimated profitability of the Fund prepared by Dreyfus. The Board members also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted the unlikelihood of soft dollar arrangements in the future with respect to trading the Fund’s portfolio. The Board also considered whether the Fund would be able to participate in any economies of scale that Dreyfus may experience in the event that the Fund attracts a large amount of assets.The Board members noted the uncertainty of the estimated asset levels, and discussed the renewal requirements for advisory agreements and their ability to review the management fee annually after an initial term of the Agreement.
36
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to approving the Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, the Board made the following conclusions and determinations.
- The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the ser- vices to be provided by Dreyfus are adequate and appropriate.
- The Board concluded that the fee to be paid by the Fund to Dreyfus was reasonable, in light of the services to be provided, comparative expense and advisory fee information, and benefits anticipated to be derived by Dreyfus from its relationship with the Fund.
- The Board determined that because the Fund had not commenced investment operations, economies of scale were not a factor and that, to the extent in the future it were to be determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the Fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the Fund.
The Board members considered these conclusions and determinations, and, without any one factor being dispositive, the Board determined that approval of the Agreement was in the best interests of the Fund.
The Fund 37
NOTES
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. There have been no amendments to, or waivers in connection with, the Code of Ethics during the period covered by this Report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Registrant's Board has determined that David P. Feldman, a member of the Audit Committee of the Board, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). David P. Feldman is "independent" as defined by the SEC for purposes of audit committee financial expert determinations.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the "Reporting Periods") for professional services rendered by the Registrant's principal accountant (the "Auditor") for the audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $69,100 in 2007 and $141,000 in 2008.
(b) Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 were $7,023 in 2007 and $26,380 in 2008.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for non-audit assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-investment adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant ("Service Affiliates"), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the Service Affiliate, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2007 and $0 in 2008.
Note: For the second paragraph in each of (b) through (d) of this Item 4, certain of such services were not pre-approved prior to May 6, 2003, when such services were required to be pre-approved. On and after May 6, 2003, 100% of all services provided by the Auditor were pre-approved as required. For comparative purposes, the fees shown assume that all such services were pre-approved, including services that were not pre-approved prior to the compliance date of the pre-approval requirement.
(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning ("Tax Services") were $13,000 in 2007 and $15,000 in 2008. These services consisted of: (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments; (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Tax Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2007 and $0 in 2008.
(d) All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item, were $909 in 2007 and $0 in 2008. [These services consisted of a review of the Registrant's anti-money laundering program].
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Non-Audit Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, other than the services reported in paragraphs (b) through (c) of this Item, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee, were $0 in 2007 and $0 in 2008.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Registrant's Audit Committee has established policies and procedures (the "Policy") for pre-approval (within specified fee limits) of the Auditor's engagements for non-audit services to the Registrant and Service Affiliates without specific case-by-case consideration. Pre-approval considerations include whether the proposed services are compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence. Pre-approvals pursuant to the Policy are considered annually.
Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to Service Affiliates, for the Reporting Periods were $0 in 2007 and $12,561,320 in 2008.
Auditor Independence. The Registrant's Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates, which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval), is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence.
Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. | |
Not applicable. [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY] | ||
Item 6. | Investments. | |
(a) | Not applicable. | |
Item 7. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management | |
Investment Companies. | ||
Not applicable. [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY] | ||
Item 8. | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. | |
Not applicable. [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY, beginning with reports for periods ended | ||
on and after December 31, 2005] | ||
Item 9. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and | |
Affiliated Purchasers. | ||
Not applicable. [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY] | ||
Item 10. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. |
The Registrant has a Nominating Committee (the "Committee"), which is responsible for selecting and nominating persons for election or appointment by the Registrant's Board as Board members. The Committee has adopted a Nominating Committee Charter (the "Charter"). Pursuant to the Charter, the Committee will consider recommendations for nominees from shareholders submitted to the Secretary of the Registrant, c/o The Dreyfus Corporation Legal Department, 200 Park Avenue, 8th Floor East, New York, New York 10166. A nomination submission must include information regarding the recommended nominee
as specified in the Charter. This information includes all information relating to a recommended nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxy statements for the election of Board members, as well as information sufficient to evaluate the factors to be considered by the Committee, including character and integrity, business and professional experience, and whether the person has the ability to apply sound and independent business judgment and would act in the interests of the Registrant and its shareholders. Nomination submissions are required to be accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the shareholders, and such additional information must be provided regarding the recommended nominee as reasonably requested by the Committee.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Code of ethics referred to in Item 2.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
SIGNATURES |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dreyfus Premier Investment Funds, Inc.
By: | /s/ J. David Officer | |
J. David Officer, | ||
President | ||
Date: | February 23, 2009 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | /s/ J. David Officer | |
J. David Officer, | ||
President | ||
Date: | February 23, 2009 | |
By: | /s/ James Windels | |
James Windels, | ||
Treasurer | ||
Date: | February 23, 2009 |
EXHIBIT INDEX |
(a)(1) Code of ethics referred to in Item 2.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT)
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)