Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Table of Contents
Page | ||
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | ||
2012 in Review | 2 | |
Outlook | 3 | |
Conservative Allocation Fund | 4 | |
Moderate Allocation Fund | 6 | |
Aggressive Allocation Fund | 8 | |
Money Market Fund | 10 | |
Bond Fund | 12 | |
High Income Fund | 14 | |
Diversified Income Fund | 16 | |
Large Cap Value Fund | 18 | |
Large Cap Growth Fund | 20 | |
Mid Cap Fund | 22 | |
Small Cap Fund | 24 | |
International Stock Fund | 26 | |
Madison Target Retirement 2020 Fund | 28 | |
Madison Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 30 | |
Madison Target Retirement 2040 Fund | 32 | |
Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund | 34 | |
Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | 36 | |
Portfolios of Investments | ||
Conservative Allocation Fund | 38 | |
Moderate Allocation Fund | 39 | |
Aggressive Allocation Fund | 40 | |
Money Market Fund | 41 | |
Bond Fund | 43 | |
High Income Fund | 46 | |
Diversified Income Fund | 49 | |
Large Cap Value Fund | 52 | |
Large Cap Growth Fund | 53 | |
Mid Cap Fund | 55 | |
Small Cap Fund | 56 | |
International Stock Fund | 58 | |
Madison Target Retirement 2020 Fund | 60 | |
Madison Target Retirement 2030 Fund | 61 | |
Madison Target Retirement 2040 Fund | 62 | |
Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund | 63 | |
Financial Statements | ||
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | 64 | |
Statements of Operations | 67 | |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 70 | |
Financial Highlights | 76 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | 92 | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | 108 | |
Other Information | 109 | |
Trustees and Officers | 114 |
Nondeposit investment products are not federally insured, involve investment risk, may lose value and are not obligations of or guaranteed by any financial institution. For more complete information about Ultra Series Fund, including charges and expenses, request a prospectus from your financial advisor or from CMFG Life Insurance Company, 2000 Heritage Way, Waverly, IA 50677. Consider the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses of any fund carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the investment company. For more current Ultra Series Fund performance information, please call 1-800-670-3600. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted within. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Nothing in this report represents a recommendation of a security by the investment adviser. Portfolio holdings may have changed since the date of this report.
1
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance
2012 IN REVIEW
The old adage that markets climb “a wall of worry” was demonstrated by domestic and international stock and bond markets in 2012. Despite signs of sluggish economic growth in the U.S., a recession in Europe, and slowing growth in the emerging markets, investors were well rewarded for holding stocks. The domestic stock market, as measured by the S&P 500, was up 16.0%, while the broad international market, as measured by the MSCI EAFE Index advanced 17.9%. The Russell Emerging Markets Index advanced 19.2%, and even investors in Europe found enough good news in the midst of a still-uncertain sovereign debt crisis to push stock valuations up strongly. The Morningstar Europe Stock Category showed mutual funds specializing in this region up 20.9% for the year. We believe the largest reason for these positive returns was the continued, unprecedented stimulus from the Federal Reserve and central banks around the world.
Stocks were not uniformly positive for the year, with a wide disparity of returns among U.S. Sectors. The Utilities Sector trailed with a loss of -2.9%, while the Financials Sector led the market with a 26.3% return, followed by the Consumer Discretionary Sector, with a 21.9% return. In general, more economically sensitive and lower-quality stocks rallied, while the more defensive sectors such as Utilities and Consumer Staples lagged the broader market. Lower demand and increased energy production, particularly in domestic natural gas, dampened commodity returns, with the S&P Energy Sector up just 2.3% for the year. In general, small and mid-cap stocks advanced in the same range as large stocks, while value stocks had a slight advantage over similarly sized stocks classified as “growth.”
Bond investors enjoyed positive returns, with the most conservative short-term government issuances producing minor advances, while riskier long-term and lower-quality bonds flourished. The bond markets were led by high-yield bonds, which tend to move in tandem with the stock markets. The Barclays High-Yield Bond Index was up 15.8%, the broader Barclay’s Corporate Bond Index advanced 9.8%, while the thin-yielding U.S. Treasuries showed a more modest 2.0% gain, as measured by Barclays U.S. Treasury Bond Index.
While investment returns were heartening to investors, the journey was uneven. Headlines seemed to provide an endless stream of uncertainties from around the world. The most potent of these influences was the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. Worries over the possible default of debt by the most economically troubled countries in southern Europe took the steam out of the year’s first quarter rally, as the S&P 500 dipped -9.6% between April 2 and June 1 when perceived progress on resolving Greece’s debt crisis fueled a rally. The S&P 500 advanced 15.4% between June 1 and September 14, as confidence rose for a positive resolution in Europe, fueled by European Central bank President Mario Draghi’s July statement that he would do “whatever it takes” to hold the Eurozone together. As the year progressed the nation’s attention turned away from Europe to the presidential election and only late in the period did investors begin to focus on the so-called “fiscal cliff.” The January 2013 deadline for automatic shifts to higher taxes and lower spending was partially fended off with a late-December, last-minute compromise which came too late to make up for the stock market’s December losses in response to nervousness regarding the pending fiscal cliff.
2
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
OUTLOOK
While optimism prevailed in 2012, we believe that the market may be overlooking the wide variety of risks that remain unresolved. These include worldwide credit issues, the upcoming battle over the domestic debt ceiling, and the possibility that the Federal Reserve may begin to shift its long-standing policy of near-zero rates. A sign that the “risk on” trade prevailed in 2012 was the rally in the stocks of speculative and highly leveraged companies, matched in the bond market by the preference for long-term and low-quality issuance. This risk concern shouldn’t suggest that we recommend shifting sensible asset allocation strategies. Instead, we believe investors should consider rebalancing portfolios and examining the underlying risks of their holdings.
In stocks, we remain convinced that fundamentals continue to count, and investors may benefit from owning solid companies with the ability to potentially produce strong results in all kinds of environments.
In bonds, we anticipate the 10-year Treasury yield will fluctuate in a much wider range than experienced in 2012 and volatility will increase. We believe the high corporate bond valuations have largely run their course and anticipate increased volatility in 2013 as demand for corporate bonds transitions to more normal levels, especially if investors begin to rebalance their portfolios to a more normal stock allocation. We estimate investment-grade bond returns in 2013 may equal the yield to maturity, and at worst believe a moderate increase in rates could challenge returns in 2013. As a result, we encourage investors to look beyond the broad classification such as “bond” to see what sort of interest-rate and credit risks they may be holding. Our outlook suggests that risk-averse investors with an interest in capital preservation should focus on higher-quality, and lower to intermediate maturity issues to mitigate the potential damages of rising rates or lower valuations on corporate bonds.
3
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
CONSERVATIVE ALLOCATION FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Conservative Allocation Fund invests primarily in shares of registered investment companies (the “underlying funds”). The fund will be diversified among a number of asset classes and its allocation among underlying funds will be based on an asset allocation model developed by Madison Asset Management, LLC (“Madison”), the fund’s investment adviser.
The team may use multiple analytical approaches to determine the appropriate asset allocation, including, but not limited to:
• | Asset allocation optimization analysis – considers the degree to which returns in different asset classes do or do not move together, and the fund’s aim to achieve a favorable overall risk profile for any targeted portfolio return. |
• | Scenario analysis – historical and expected return data is analyzed to model how individual asset classes and combinations of asset classes would affect the fund under different economic and market conditions. |
• | Fundamental analysis – draws upon Madison’s investment teams to judge each asset class against current and forecasted market condi-tions. Economic, industry and security analysis is used to develop return and risk expectations that may influence asset class selection. |
In addition, Madison employs a risk management sleeve within the fund for the purpose of risk reduction when and if conditions exist that require reduction of equity exposure.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1,2
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121,2 | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | Since 6/30/06 Inception | Since 5/1/09 Inception | ||||||||||||
Ultra Series Conservative Allocation, Class I | 8.98 | % | 6.80 | % | 3.15 | % | 4.15 | % | — | |||||||
Ultra Series Conservative Allocation, Class II | 8.71 | 6.53 | — | — | 9.38 | % | ||||||||||
Conservative Allocation Fund Custom Index | 8.75 | 7.98 | 4.91 | 6.02 | 11.46 | |||||||||||
Bank of America Merrill Lynch US Corp, Govt & Mortg Index | 4.43 | 6.24 | 6.03 | 6.54 | 6.46 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
4
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Conservative Allocation Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||
Bond Funds | 60 | % | |
Foreign Bond Funds | 6 | % | |
Stock Funds | 26 | % | |
Foreign Stock Funds | 6 | % | |
Money Market Funds and Other Net Assets | 2 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, the Conservative Allocation Fund returned 8.98% (Class I Shares), while the custom blended Conservative Allocation benchmark returned 8.75%. While the fund beat its blended benchmark, it finished behind the Morningstar Conservative Allocation Category average return of 9.40%. We believe outperformance against the benchmark was a result of strong manager performance within the fixed income holdings and an overweight position to corporate bonds. In general, our allocation and manager selection leaned toward lower-risk, which we believe made a difference when compared to the Morningstar peer group in a year in which riskier assets showed a large gap over more conservative securities.
FUND CHANGES
After beginning the year with a modest underweight to equities, the fund ended the year roughly neutral relative to its benchmark. Our confidence to increase equities was underpinned by improved economic data and massive global central bank liquidity measures. In the middle of the year, we began to increase foreign equity exposure. This came on the heels of decisive action by Mario Draghi and the European Central Bank, which we believed removed much of the near-term tail risk from the European markets. However, the fund still remains underweight in comparison to its benchmark in foreign equities as we believe risks from Europe are still very much present. Late in the year, we began to materially reduce the level of both investment grade and high yield credit in the fund. We believe the credit markets have become fully valued and wanted to profit from these investments and dampen the risk level of the fixed income holdings. Finally, throughout the year we opportunistically increased exchange traded fund (“ETF”) holdings to better align the underlying cost structure and upside participation level of the fund.
5
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
MODERATE ALLOCATION FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Moderate Allocation Fund invests primarily in shares of registered investment companies (the “underlying funds”). The fund will be diversified among a number of asset classes and its allocation among underlying funds will be based on an asset allocation model developed by Madison Asset Management, LLC (“Madison”), the fund’s investment adviser.
The team may use multiple analytical approaches to determine the appropriate asset allocation, including, but not limited to:
• | Asset allocation optimization analysis – considers the degree to which returns in different asset classes do or do not move together, and the fund’s aim to achieve a favorable overall risk profile for any targeted portfolio return. |
• | Scenario analysis – historical and expected return data is analyzed to model how individual asset classes and combinations of asset classes would affect the fund under different economic and market conditions. |
• | Fundamental analysis – draws upon Madison’s investment teams to judge each asset class against current and forecasted market conditions. Economic, industry and security analysis is used to develop return and risk expectations that may influence asset class selection. |
In addition, Madison employs a risk management sleeve within the fund for the purpose of risk reduction when and if conditions exist that require reduction of equity exposure.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1,2
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121,2 | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | Since 6/30/06 Inception | Since 5/1/09 Inception | ||||||||||||
Ultra Series Moderate Allocation, Class I | 10.54 | % | 7.52 | % | 0.90 | % | 3.01 | % | — | |||||||
Ultra Series Moderate Allocation, Class II | 10.26 | 7.26 | — | — | 10.99 | % | ||||||||||
Moderate Allocation Fund Custom Index | 11.94 | 8.55 | 3.55 | 5.28 | 14.75 | |||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 16.00 | 10.87 | 1.66 | 4.01 | 16.77 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
6
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Moderate Allocation Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||
Bond Funds | 37 | % | |
Foreign Bond Funds | 3 | % | |
Stock Funds | 47 | % | |
Foreign Stock Funds | 11 | % | |
Money Market Funds and Other Net Assets | 2 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, the Moderate Allocation Fund returned 10.54% (Class I Shares), while the custom blended Moderate Allocation benchmark returned 11.94%. The fund also trailed the Morningstar Moderate Allocation Category average return of 11.72%. In a year of strong equity returns, the fund was hurt by an underweight position to equities at the start of the period, even as it ended the year roughly neutral relative to its benchmark. We also underweighted foreign equities in a year in which the broad international indices were stronger than the domestic indices. Our confidence to increase equities was underpinned by improved economic data and massive global central bank liquidity measures.
FUND CHANGES
In the middle of the year, we began to increase foreign equity exposure. This came on the heels of decisive action by Mario Draghi and the European Central Bank, which we believed removed much of the near-term tail risk from the European markets. However, the fund still remains underweight in comparison to our benchmark in foreign equities as we believe risks from Europe are still very much present. Late in the year, we began to materially reduce the level of both investment grade and high yield credit in the fund. We believe that the credit markets have become fully valued and wanted to profit from these investments and dampen the risk level of the fixed income holdings. Finally, throughout the year we opportunistically increased exchange traded fund (“ETF”) holdings to better align the underlying cost structure and upside participation level of the fund.
7
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
AGGRESSIVE ALLOCATION FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Aggressive Allocation Fund invests primarily in shares of registered investment companies (the “underlying funds”). The fund will be diversified among a number of asset classes and its allocation among underlying funds will be based on an asset allocation model developed by Madison Asset Management, LLC (“Madison”), the fund’s investment adviser.
The team may use multiple analytical approaches to determine the appropriate asset allocation, including, but not limited to:
• | Asset allocation optimization analysis – considers the degree to which returns in different asset classes do or do not move together, and the fund’s aim to achieve a favorable overall risk profile for any targeted portfolio return. |
• | Scenario analysis – historical and expected return data is analyzed to model how individual asset classes and combinations of asset classes would affect the fund under different economic and market conditions. |
• | Fundamental analysis – draws upon Madison’s investment teams to judge each asset class against current and forecasted market conditions. Economic, industry and security analysis is used to develop return and risk expectations that may influence asset class selection. |
In addition, Madison employs a risk management sleeve within the fund for the purpose of risk reduction when and if conditions exist that require reduction of equity exposure.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1,2
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121,2 | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | Since 6/30/06 Inception | Since 5/1/09 Inception | ||||||||||||
Ultra Series Aggressive Allocation, Class I | 11.34 | % | 7.53 | % | -1.29 | % | 1.97 | % | — | |||||||
Ultra Series Aggressive Allocation, Class II | 11.06 | 7.27 | — | — | 12.56 | % | ||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation Fund Custom Index | 15.18 | 8.56 | 1.71 | 4.21 | 17.77 | |||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 16.00 | 10.87 | 1.66 | 4.01 | 16.77 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
8
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Aggressive Allocation Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||
Bond Funds | 13 | % | |
Foreign Bond Funds | 1 | % | |
Stock Funds | 67 | % | |
Foreign Stock Funds | 18 | % | |
Money Market Funds and Other Net Assets | 1 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, the Aggressive Allocation Fund returned 11.34% (Class I Shares), while the custom blended Aggressive Allocation benchmark return of 15.18%. The fund’s performance also trailed the Morningstar Aggressive Allocation Category average return of 13.42%. Underperformance was largely a result of our underweighting to equities during the first months of the year versus the benchmark during a very strong, double-digit quarter. Additionally, weak relative returns in the fund’s core U.S. equities provided a drag on performance. In general, these results reflect the fund’s overall risk posture. We believe that even an aggressive allocation fund should be constructed to have lower volatility than a pure equity portfolio. This philosophy does have the potential to constrain performance when worldwide equities are not only up strongly, but favor lower-quality, speculative companies as was the case in 2012.
FUND CHANGES
After beginning the year with a modest underweight to equities, the fund ended the year roughly neutral relative to its benchmark. Our confidence to increase equities was underpinned by improved economic data and massive global central bank liquidity measures. In the middle of the year, we began to increase foreign equity exposure. This came on the heels of decisive action by Mario Draghi and the European Central Bank, which we believed removed much of the near-term tail risk from the European markets. By the end of the year, the fund’s overall international equity allocation moved to roughly neutral relative to the benchmark, although the fund still remains underweight European equities. Finally, late in the year we began to materially reduce the level of both investment grade and high yield credit in the fund. We believe that the credit markets have become fully valued and wanted to profit from these investments and dampen the risk level of the fixed income holdings. Finally, throughout the year we opportunistically increased exchange traded fund (“ETF”) holdings to better align the underlying cost structure and upside participation level of the fund.
9
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
MONEY MARKET FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Money Market Fund invests exclusively in U.S. dollar-denominated money market securities maturing in thirteen months or less from the date of purchase. These securities will be obligations of the U.S. Government and its agencies and instrumentalities, but may also include securities issued by U.S. and foreign financial institutions, corporations, municipalities, foreign governments, and multi-national organizations, such as the World Bank. The fund may invest in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, including those representing pools of mortgage, commercial, or consumer loans originated by credit unions or other financial institutions.
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||
Federal Farm Credit Bank | 5 | % | |
Fannie Mae | 17 | % | |
Federal Home Loan Bank | 23 | % | |
Freddie Mac | 22 | % | |
U.S. Treasury Notes | 8 | % | |
Commercial Paper | �� | 19 | % |
Cash and Other Net Assets | 6 | % |
10
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
This page was intentionally left blank.
11
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
BOND FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
Under normal circumstances, the Ultra Series Bond Fund invests at least 80% of its assets in bonds. To keep current income relatively stable and to limit share price volatility, the fund emphasizes investment grade securities and maintains an intermediate (typically 3-6 year) average portfolio duration (a measure of a security’s price sensitivity to changes in interest rates). The fund also strives to minimize risk in the portfolio by making strategic decisions relating to credit risk and yield curve outlook. The fund may invest in corporate debt securities, U.S. Government debt securities, foreign government debt securities, non-rated debt securities, and asset-backed, mortgage-backed and commercial mortgage-backed securities.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121 | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | Since 5/1/09 Inception | ||||||||||||
Ultra Series Bond, Class I | 3.21 | % | 5.28 | % | 5.03 | % | 4.31 | % | — | |||||||
Ultra Series Bond, Class II | 2.96 | 5.02 | — | — | 5.63 | % | ||||||||||
Bank of America Merrill Lynch US Corp, Govt & Mortg Index | 4.43 | 6.24 | 6.03 | 5.26 | 6.46 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
12
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Bond Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||
Asset Backed | 1 | % | |
Corporate Notes and Bonds | 28 | % | |
Mortgage Backed | 16 | % | |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations | 51 | % | |
Cash and Other Net Assets | 4 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, the Ultra Series Bond Fund returned 3.21% (Class I shares), while the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Corp. Government & Mortgage Index returned 4.43%. The most important factor for the underperformance was a significant underweighting to banks and to financials in general. The banking sector earned an excess return over Treasuries of more than 13% which was almost as high a return as the high yield market in 2012. Sector allocation relative to this sector helps explain performance in 2012. Fund performance was also modestly hurt by an underweighting to the mortgage sector and by its relatively shorter duration in a declining rate environment. The performance was positively impacted by an overweighting of corporate bonds in general and BBB rated securities in particular. It also benefitted from individual security selection in that a number of investments such as Transocean Inc. and Westvaco Corp. were perceived as improving. Sector allocation and duration remained stable throughout the period.
13
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
HIGH INCOME FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series High Income Fund invests primarily in lower-rated, higher-yielding income bearing securities, such as “junk” bonds. Because the performance of these securities has historically been strongly influenced by economic conditions, the fund may emphasize security selection in business sectors that favor the economic outlook. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in bonds rated lower than investment grade (BBB/Baa) and their unrated equivalents or other high-yielding securities.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121 | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | Since 5/1/09 Inception | ||||||||||||
Ultra Series High Income, Class I | 11.23 | % | 9.28 | % | 8.36 | % | 8.23 | % | — | |||||||
Ultra Series High Income, Class II | 10.95 | 9.01 | — | — | 12.12 | % | ||||||||||
Bank of America Merrill Lynch US High Yield Master II, Constrained | 15.55 | 11.54 | 10.14 | 10.38 | 18.54 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
14
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
High Income Fund (concluded)
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||
Consumer Discretionary† | 35 | % | |
Consumer Staples | 6 | % | |
Energy | 14 | % | |
Financials | 3 | % | |
Health Care | 9 | % | |
Industrials | 7 | % | |
Information Technology | 3 | % | |
Materials | 9 | % | |
Telecommunication Services | 6 | % | |
Utilities | 2 | % | |
Cash and Other Net Assets | 6 | % | |
†Consumer Discretionary includes securities in the following industries: auto components; automobiles; hotels, restaurants & leisure; household durables; media; specialty retail; and textiles, apparel & luxury goods. |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
The Ultra Series High Income Fund was more conservative and less volatile than the overall high yield market during 2012. The fund produced a return of 11.23% (Class I shares), underperforming the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Constrained Index (HUCO), which returned 15.55%. Being underweight the Financials Sector was a key detractor, as was negative selection within the Telecommunication Services Sector. However, being underweight the Energy Sector contributed strongly to performance, as did positive selection within the Utilities Sector.
The high-yield bond market rallied strong through most of 2012, capping off a banner year in which overwhelmingly positive technical forces and strong fundamentals herded yield-hungry investors to the high yield bond market’s relative value in a low-interest rate environment. We believe high yield was a direct beneficiary of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s latest round of quantitative easing and near-zero interest rate policies, which drove investors to purchase riskier assets and issuers to capitalize on the favorable market conditions. While 15% returns for 2013 are unlikely, we believe the market is well positioned to continue on a strong path. Demand for high yield remained solid through the fourth quarter and showed little sign of slowing. With anemic economic growth, an entrenched low-interest rate environment, modest defaults and strong corporate balance sheets, high yield seems well positioned heading into 2013.
FUND CHANGES
The fund was selectively active as we increased exposure in more stable credits with higher earnings predictability and reduced holdings of volatile components. For the year, there were 130 purchases aggregating $45.3 million and 183 sales totaling $50.8 million. In terms of new issues, the fund participated in 48 new deals. We increased sector allocations in Oil & Gas, Media-Cable, and Automotive while reducing holdings in Utilities, Telecommunication Services and Media-Diversified & Services. The portfolio also shifted towards higher ratings categories, with a roughly 1% increase in B rated bonds and 1% decrease in CCC rated exposure. As such, the portfolio’s ratings weightings were 33% in BB rated bonds, 48% in B rated bonds and 13% in CCC rated bonds. Also, as of year-end, the fund had fully exited all convertible bond positions.
15
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
DIVERSIFIED INCOME FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Diversified Income Fund seeks income by investing in a broadly diversified array of securities including bonds, common stocks, real estate securities, foreign market bonds and stocks and money market instruments. Bonds, stock and cash components will vary, reflecting the portfolio managers’ judgments of the relative availability of attractively yielding and priced stocks and bonds. Generally, however, bonds will constitute up to 80% of the fund’s assets, stocks will constitute up to 60% of the fund’s assets, real estate securities will constitute up to 25% of the fund’s assets, foreign stocks and bonds will constitute up to 25% of the fund’s assets and money market instruments may constitute up to 25% of the fund’s assets. The fund intends to limit the investment in lower credit quality bonds to less than 50% of the fund’s assets. The balance between the two strategies of the fund (fixed income and equity investing) is determined after reviewing the risks associated with each type of investment, with the goal of meaningful risk reduction as market conditions demand. The fund typically sells a stock when the fundamental expectations for producing competitive yields at an acceptable level of price risk no longer apply, the price exceeds the intrinsic value or other stocks appear more attractive.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121 | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | Since 5/1/09 Inception | ||||||||||||
Ultra Series Diversified Income, Class I | 8.16 | % | 9.33 | % | 4.66 | % | 6.41 | % | — | |||||||
Ultra Series Diversified Income, Class II | 7.89 | 9.06 | — | — | 11.36 | % | ||||||||||
Custom Blended Index (50% Fixed, 50% Equity) | 10.24 | 8.90 | 4.31 | 6.49 | 11.85 | |||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 16.00 | 10.87 | 1.66 | 7.10 | 16.77 | |||||||||||
Bank of America Merrill Lynch US Corp, Govt & Mortg Index | 4.43 | 6.24 | 6.03 | 5.26 | 6.46 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
16
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Diversified Income Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||
Common Stocks | 55 | % | |
Corporate Notes and Bonds | 16 | % | |
Mortgage Backed | 7 | % | |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations | 18 | % | |
Cash and Other Net Assets | 4 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
During the twelve-month period, the Diversified Income Fund gained 8.16% (Class I Shares), while the Custom Blended Index returned 10.24%. The S&P 500 Index of large-cap stocks returned 16.00%, and the broad bond market returned 4.43% as measured by the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index. The portfolio was conservatively positioned during the period, with approximately 55% of the fund invested in mature dividend-paying stocks and 45% in bonds. The fund’s stock portfolio did not keep up with the market as measured by the S&P 500 Index. Compared to the S&P 500 Index, sector allocation was positive due mainly to the fund’s underweight position in Technology, while stock selection was detractive with the largest impact from underperforming stocks in Technology, Health Care and Industrial Sectors. Intel and Broadridge Financial Solutions hurt results in Technology, while Johnson & Johnson, Merck and Medtronic negatively impact performance in Health Care. Within Industrials, Norfolk Southern and UPS lagged. On the positive side, Ensco, Diageo and Time Warner contributed positively to returns.
The bond portion of the fund contributed positively to overall fund performance, but did not pace the overall market as measured by the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index. The market heavily favored lower quality and longer bonds, the areas of the market subject to the greatest potential volatility. During the annual period, Barclays measured the top-rated intermediate-term corporate bonds (AAA) advancing 3.19% while the lowest-rated segment (CA-D) rose 27.61%. The fund is managed with an emphasis on risk control and the goal of moderating losses in a down market. As a result, the fund held shorter bonds and higher quality issuance, areas which had modest returns in a year in which more speculative issues with higher yields were preferred.
FUND CHANGES
Stock sector allocation was generally stable through this period, even as we made a number of portfolio changes. We sold Broadridge and Norfolk Southern due to worries about sub-par earnings growth related to a lack of pricing power. The other stocks mentioned above appear to us to have solid prospects and we continue to hold them. We will look to add on weakness or fundamental improvement. We have maintained a conservative posture on the bond side, believing that the long bull market in bonds has squeezed the bulk of the value out of this sector. Our strategy is to emphasize capital preservation, giving us the ability to add yield should the opportunity arise.
17
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
LARGE CAP VALUE FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Large Cap Value Fund will, under normal market conditions, invest primarily in large cap stocks. The fund follows a “value” approach, meaning the portfolio managers seek to invest in stocks at prices below their perceived intrinsic value as estimated based on fundamental analysis of the issuing company and its prospects. By investing in value stocks, the fund attempts to limit the downside risk over time but may also produce smaller gains than other stock funds if their intrinsic values are not realized by the market or if growth-oriented investments are favored by investors. The fund will diversify its holdings among various industries and among companies within those industries. The fund typically sells a stock when the fundamental expectations for buying it no longer apply, the price exceeds its intrinsic value or other stocks appear more attractively priced relative to their intrinsic values.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121 | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | Since 5/1/09 Inception | ||||||||||||
Ultra Series Large Cap Value, Class I | 11.82 | % | 9.15 | % | -0.56 | % | 5.83 | % | — | |||||||
Ultra Series Large Cap Value, Class II | 11.55 | 8.88 | — | — | 14.19 | % | ||||||||||
Russell 1000 Value Index | 17.51 | 10.86 | 0.59 | 7.38 | 16.81 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
The Ultra Large Cap Value Fund returned 11.82% (Class I Shares) for the annual period. During the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, large-cap value stocks demonstrated somewhat better performance than the robust returns of the overall market. With the S&P 500 up 16.00%, the S&P 500 Value Index rose 17.76% and the Russell 1000® Value Index rose 17.51%. While we were pleased to deliver double-digit returns to shareholders, the fund’s return of 11.82% was disappointing in light of the strength in the value indices. However, the underperformance in 2012 was very much in line with the outperformance in 2011. This is an often-observed market pattern of market
18
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Large Cap Value Fund (concluded)
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||||||
Fund | Russell 1000® Value Index | ||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 9 | % | 8 | % | |||
Consumer Staples | 10 | % | 7 | % | |||
Energy | 14 | % | 16 | % | |||
Financials† | 26 | % | 28 | % | |||
Health Care | 17 | % | 12 | % | |||
Industrials | 12 | % | 9 | % | |||
Information Technology | 4 | % | 6 | % | |||
Materials | 3 | % | 4 | % | |||
Telecommunication Services | 1 | % | 3 | % | |||
Utilities | — | % | 7 | % | |||
Cash and Other Net Assets | 4 | % | — | % | |||
†Financials includes securities in the following industries: capital markets; commercial banks; insurance; and real estate management & development. |
fluctuation, as the stocks that outperform during one period revert back to the mean over the subsequent one.
The most important component of the fund’s underperformance was the relative returns across the quality spectrum. As measured by Merrill Lynch Quantitative Strategy, A+ and A-rated stocks each returned 10.4% while B-rated stocks were up 18.9% and the lowest-rated segment of C&D stocks returned 25.3%. We have a preference for stocks whose strong fundamentals put them in the higher quality categories.
Stock selection and sector allocation were also a relative drag on performance. The fund’s stocks underperformed their S&P Sectors in Industrial, Financials and Energy. While we have great confidence in insurance holding Markel, it was punished for an acquisition which we believe will turn out to be profitable. While Markel contributed to the financial underperformance, the greater impact came from not owning what we believe to be the riskier, credit-sensitive banks. Other lagging stocks included Norfolk Southern and UPS in Industrials and Canadian Natural Resources and Occidental in Energy.
We continue to find value in stocks that have above-average dividend yields and that are likely to provide dividend growth. These stocks make up 75% of the Large Cap Value portfolio. We have a favorable outlook for this group of blue chip, dividend-paying stocks. The average yield of stock held in the portfolio at year-end was 2.5%, higher than the yield on the S&P 500 of 2.1% and the 10-year Treasury bond yield of 1.8%. High dividend stocks have historically been more resilient in times of stress and sharply dropping markets, which makes the Large-Cap Value portfolio particularly attractive to investors who want the growth potential of stocks, but have concerns regarding downside volatility.
FUND CHANGES
Over the course of the year the fund did not undergo any major strategic or sector shifts. Weighting in the top-performing Financials Sector was up 2.6%, Health Care was up 2.8% and Consumer Discretionary was up 2.9%. The weighting in Technology fell -3.5%, Utilities decreased -2.8% as we stepped out of the sector entirely, and Telecommunication Services fell -1.2%. Among the new issues in the portfolio were Health Care stock Becton Dickinson, and Consumer Discretionary holding Viacom. We sold Broadridge Financial Solutions, IBM and Paychex out of Information Technology, added Accenture and Automatic Data Processing, and trimmed positions in Intel and Microsoft. In exiting the Utilities Sector we sold Exelon and First Energy.
19
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
LARGE CAP GROWTH FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Large Cap Growth Fund invests primarily in common stocks of larger companies and will, under normal market conditions, maintain at least 80% of its assets in large cap stocks. The fund follows a “growth” approach, meaning the portfolio managers seek stocks that have low market prices relative to their perceived growth capabilities as estimated based on fundamental analysis of the issuing companies and their prospects. The fund typically seeks higher earnings growth capabilities in the stocks it purchases, and may include some companies undergoing more significant changes in their operations or experiencing significant changes in their markets. The fund will diversify its holdings among various industries and among companies within those industries. The fund has an active trading strategy which will lead to more portfolio turnover than a more passively-managed fund. The fund typically sells a stock when the fundamental expectations for buying it no longer apply, the price exceeds its perceived value or other stocks appear more attractively priced relative to their prospects.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121 | ||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | Since 5/1/09 Inception | ||||||||||||
Ultra Series Large Cap Growth, Class I | 11.20 | % | 7.21 | % | 1.32 | % | 6.43 | % | — | |||||||
Ultra Series Large Cap Growth, Class II | 10.93 | 6.94 | — | — | 12.56 | % | ||||||||||
Russell 1000® Growth Index | 15.26 | 11.35 | 3.12 | 7.52 | 17.40 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012 the Large Cap Growth Fund returned 11.20% (Class I Shares), while the Russell 1000® Growth Index returned 15.26%. We were disappointed by this relative return, which was handicapped by the outperformance of lower-quality stocks over higher-quality companies and underperformance in individual stock selection.
From a sector attribution perspective, the fund’s two largest detractors were Health Care and Information Technology. Health Care as a sector produced above-benchmark results for the period, with particular strength in the biotech
20
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Large Cap Growth Fund (concluded)
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | |||||||
Fund | Russell 1000® Growth Index | ||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 17 | % | 17 | % | |||
Consumer Staples | 8 | % | 12 | % | |||
Energy | 5 | % | 4 | % | |||
Financials | 5 | % | 5 | % | |||
Health Care | 10 | % | 12 | % | |||
Industrials | 12 | % | 13 | % | |||
Information Technology† | 33 | % | 31 | % | |||
Materials | 4 | % | 4 | % | |||
Telecommunication Services | 2 | % | 2 | % | |||
Utilities | — | % | — | % | |||
Cash and Other Net Assets | 4 | % | — | % | |||
†Information Technology includes securities in the following industries: communications equipment; computers and peripherals; electrical equipment; internet software & services; IT services; semiconductors & semiconductor equipment; and software. |
area. The fund’s biotech holdings produced positive returns, but did not include the sector leaders. For instance, the portfolio’s largest biotech holding was Celgene, one of the five largest domestic biotech firms. It returned 16.08% in 2012, while the average return of the other top four largest biotechs, none of which were held by the fund, was 46.92%. We believe this leaves Celgene with unrealized upside potential in upcoming quarters.
The technology holdings in the Russell 1000® Growth benchmark advanced 17.52%, ahead of the overall return of the boarder Russell 1000® Index’s 16.42%. The portfolio had some strong stocks in this area, including Apple. However, the fund had two disappointing holdings, Sandisk and MICROS Systems. Sandisk is a flash memory company whose products appear in tablets and smart phones. Excess industry-wide capacity restrained expected pricing advances. Micros, a provider of hotel and restaurant reservation systems, is one of our higher conviction holdings. The stock dropped over the course of the year as the hospitality industry continued to struggle in the slow-growth economic climate, depressing sales of new product.
The fund had strong relative performance in Consumer Staples and Energy, producing returns above the Index sectors of 0.75% and 0.60% respectively. In Consumer Staples Hershey was additive as it gained almost 20% for the year. The fund’s holding in Petrobras, a Brazilian based international oil company, was also additive to performance.
Finally, the fund began the year with exposure to several smaller companies which appeared poised for strong returns. This strategy did not work as planned. For instance, Acme Packet, a technology company whose products are essential to the build-out of higher speed digital networks, received reduced orders from some major telecom companies and the stock price declined.
FUND CHANGES
With a recognition near mid-year that global growth was likely to remain tepid for some time, we reduced the fund’s exposure to economically sensitive, smaller companies. We deployed the proceeds into larger, higher-quality issues while sector diversification increased within the portfolio. Entering 2013, we believe the operating environment for companies should continue to be challenging, but absent another major unforeseen economic shock, can continue to produce selective opportunities for growth. Consequently, the fund remains focused on companies which have intrinsic reasons for driving success. For example, Google in the internet space, continues its innovation in global search and to maintain global leadership with its Android operating system for smart phones and tablets. Given expectations for the continued strength in mobile computing, the fund invested in a number of companies which continue to gain share from older ways of doing business, such as Nuance, the leading voice recognition company whose products are used in Apple’s Siri offering as well as in health care transcription services.
21
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
MID CAP FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Mid Cap Fund generally invests in common stocks of midsize companies and will, under normal market conditions, maintain at least 80% of its assets in mid cap securities. However, the fund will not automatically sell a stock because its market capitalization has changed and such positions may be increased through additional purchases. The fund seeks attractive long-term returns through bottom-up security selection based on fundamental analysis in a diversified portfolio of high-quality growth companies with attractive valuations. These will typically be industry leading companies in niches with strong growth prospects. The fund’s portfolio managers believe in selecting stocks for the fund that show steady, sustainable growth and reasonable valuations. As a result, stocks of issuers that are believed to have a blend of both value and growth potential will be selected for investment. Stocks are generally sold when target prices are reached, company fundamentals deteriorate or more attractive stocks are identified.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Since | ||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/09 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | Inception | ||||||||||||||||
Ultra Series Mid Cap, Class I | 16.24 | % | 13.41 | % | 2.67 | % | 8.53 | % | — | |||||||||||
Ultra Series Mid Cap, Class II | 15.95 | 13.13 | — | — | 17.84 | % | ||||||||||||||
Russell Midcap Index | 17.28 | 13.15 | 3.57 | 10.65 | 19.73 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Mid Cap Fund gained 16.24% (Class I Shares), while the Russell Midcap® Index returned 17.28%. While the fund trailed the benchmark slightly, we were content with performance for the year, considering the market environment which favored riskier stocks over fundamentally solid ones. The strongest returns came from the market’s best returning sectors: Financials and Consumer Discretionary. The fund’s financials holdings, which emphasized insurance firms over credit-sensitive banks, did not keep up with the 24.1% return of the Russell Midcap® Index’s Financials Sector, but did contribute to the fund’s positive results second only to Consumer
22
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Mid Cap Fund (concluded)
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | ||||||||
Russell | ||||||||
Midcap® | ||||||||
Fund | Index | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 21 | % | 17 | % | ||||
Consumer Staples | 3 | % | 6 | % | ||||
Energy | 7 | % | 7 | % | ||||
Financials | 23 | % | 20 | % | ||||
Health Care | 8 | % | 10 | % | ||||
Industrials | 20 | % | 13 | % | ||||
Information Technology | 4 | % | 13 | % | ||||
Materials | 7 | % | 7 | % | ||||
Telecommunication | ||||||||
Services | – | 2 | % | |||||
Utilities | – | 5 | % | |||||
Cash and Other Net Assets | 7 | % | – |
Discretionary. The fund’s Consumer Discretionary holdings were mixed, but overall additive to performance. While the Energy Sector was relatively weak, with the Index sector up 7.2%, the fund’s Energy holdings saw relative strength. The fund lost ground to the Index in the Health Care and Technology Sectors. Among individual holdings, the largest contributions to return came from Brookfield Asset Management, Copart Inc. and M&T Bank. On the other hand, stocks which trailed the market’s return included technology holdings Micros Systems, Broadridge Financial Solutions and FLIR Systems, the latter two of which were sold during the course of the year.
FUND CHANGES
We made relatively few changes to the portfolio over the year, but did find some attractive opportunities. Examining two of these illustrates our bottom-up stock selection process. Expeditors International is a stock we purchased early in the fall and a good example of the sort of company we like to hold when valuations are attractive. We had an opportunity to purchase the company at 15 times forward earnings, excluding the cash on the balance sheet. We think of Expeditors as a travel agent for freight movement across the globe. In addition to shipping goods it provides other services such as distribution management, cargo insurance, and customs clearance. The business model is “asset light” since there is very little need for capital expenditures. The company has what we believe to be a solid balance sheet, with over six dollars a share in net cash, and a highly capable management team. Recent valuation has been compressed due to concerns over global growth and weak air travel and ocean travel volumes. We believe these are temporary issues and conditions will improve once the global macro-economy and global trade improve.
Another addition of the portfolio early in the fourth quarter was Crown Holding, a manufacturer of aluminum cans which are used for beverages, food products and other consumer products. The industry in which it participates is a global oligopoly, so there are just a few players. Management is shareholder friendly and has a track record of wise allocation of capital. Crown Holding has invested to build capacity in developing markets, particularly China and Brazil. These markets may generate higher returns on invested capital than developed markets, and future growth should be stronger. We believe this investment will pay off, going forward. We purchased the stock at what we calculate to be about 8.5 times future normalized free cash flow, which we believe was an attractive multiple.
23
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
SMALL CAP FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Small Cap Fund invests primarily in a diversified mix of common stocks of small cap U.S. companies that are believed to be undervalued by various measures and offer sound prospects for capital appreciation. The portfolio managers employ a value-oriented investment approach in selecting stocks, using proprietary fundamental research to identify securities of companies they believe have attractive valuations. The portfolio managers focus on companies with a record of above average rates of profitability that sell at a discount relative to the overall small cap market. Through fundamental research, the portfolio managers seek to identify those companies that possess one or more of the following characteristics: sustainable competitive advantages within a market niche; strong profitability and free cash flows; strong market share positions and trends; quality of and share ownership by management; and financial structures that are more conservative than the relevant industry average.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Since | Since | |||||||||||||||||||
5/1/07 | 5/1/09 | |||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | Inception | ||||||||||||||||
Class I Shares | 15.39 | % | 13.87 | % | 7.66 | % | 4.84 | % | — | |||||||||||
Class II Shares | 15.10 | 13.59 | — | — | 19.60 | % | ||||||||||||||
Russell 2000® Index | 16.35 | 12.26 | 3.56 | 2.17 | 17.91 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
24
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Small Cap Fund (concluded)
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | ||||||||
Russell | ||||||||
Midcap® | ||||||||
Fund | Index | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 14 | % | 12 | % | ||||
Consumer Staples | 2 | % | 3 | % | ||||
Energy | 4 | % | 6 | % | ||||
Financials | 19 | % | 37 | % | ||||
Health Care | 11 | % | 4 | % | ||||
Industrials† | 27 | % | 13 | % | ||||
Information Technology | 8 | % | 12 | % | ||||
Materials | 8 | % | 6 | % | ||||
Telecommunication | ||||||||
Services | – | 1 | % | |||||
Utilities | 4 | % | 6 | % | ||||
Cash and Other Net Assets | 3 | % | – | |||||
|
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
The Ultra Series Small Cap Fund returned 15.39% (Class I Shares) for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, underperforming its benchmark, the Russell 2000® Index, which returned 16.35% for the same period.
Sector allocation, a residual of the bottom-up stock selection process, was a significant contributor to relative results primarily due to underweight exposure to the Energy and Information Technology sectors and an overweight exposure to the Industrials sector. Cash held during the period had a negative impact on relative results. Weak selection in the Financials, Materials, and Industrials sectors was partially offset by strong stock selection within Health Care, Energy, and Information Technology.
The fund’s largest contributors to relative and absolute performance during the period included retailer Stage Stores, contract research organization ICON, and Maximus, an outsourcing provider for government health and human services. Diversified industrial manufacturer Carlisle Companies was also among top contributors to absolute performance. The fund’s largest detractors from relative returns during the period included office supplier ACCO Brands, office product wholesaler United Stationers, and packaging company Aptargroup. PSS World Medical, a distributor of medical products and equipment to physi-cian offices and assisted living facilities, and Websense were also among the largest detractors from absolute returns during the period.
FUND CHANGES
The fund’s investment approach emphasizes individual stock selection; sector weights are a residual of our bottom-up investment process. The manager does, however, carefully consider diversification across economic sectors to limit risk. Based on bottom-up stock decisions, exposure to the Materials and Industrials Sectors increased during the period and exposure to the Financials and Consumer Discretionary Sectors fell. We initiated positions in Materials companies Innospec and Sensient Technologies. In Industrials, we initiated positions in Atlas Air Worldwide and Cubic. Within Financials, we eliminated positions in Delphi Financial Group, Alleghany, and Education Realty Trust. As of the end of the period, the fund was most overweight in the Industrials and Materials Sectors relative to the Russell 2000® Index, and most underweight in Information Technology. Based on our two- to three-year time horizon, we continue to find opportunities created by the inefficiencies frequently found among small-cap companies.
25
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
INTERNATIONAL STOCK FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series International Stock Fund will invest, under normal market conditions, primarily in foreign equity securities. Typically, a majority of the fund’s assets are invested in relatively large capitalization stocks of companies located or operating in developed countries. The fund may also invest up to 30% of its assets in securities of companies whose principal business activities are located in emerging market countries. The portfolio managers typically maintain this segment of the fund’s portfolio in such stocks which it believes have a low market price relative to their perceived value based on fundamental analysis of the issuing company and its prospects. The fund may also invest in foreign debt and other income bearing securities at times when it believes that income bearing securities have greater capital appreciation potential than equity securities.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Since | ||||||||||||||||||||
5/1/09 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | 10 Years | Inception | ||||||||||||||||
Ultra Series International Stock, Class I | 21.31 | % | 6.24 | % | -1.20 | % | 9.35 | % | — | |||||||||||
Ultra Series International Stock, Class II | 21.01 | 5.98 | — | — | 13.18 | % | ||||||||||||||
MSCI EAFE Index (net) | 17.32 | 3.56 | -3.69 | 8.21 | 11.81 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
26
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
International Stock Fund (concluded)
SECTOR ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | ||||||||
Africa | 1 | % | ||||||
Europe (excluding United Kingdom) | 42 | % | ||||||
Japan | 15 | % | ||||||
Latin America | 3 | % | ||||||
Pacific Basin | 8 | % | ||||||
United Kingdom | 23 | % | ||||||
Other Countries | 6 | % | ||||||
Cash and Other Net Assets | 2 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
The Ultra Series International Stock fund’s 21.31% return for the year bested the MSCI EAFE Index (net), which was up 17.32%.This strong performance was primarily driven by stock selection. Within the Materials Sector, James Hardie performed well on strong demand from a recovering U.S. housing industry. In the Information Technology Sector, Samsung continued to outperform on strong smart phone sales.
The fund was negatively impacted by the Financials Sector, as Credit Suisse Group underperformed following a report which called for a strengthening of its capital base. Stock selection in Japan also detracted from relative returns, as SoftBank declined following the announced acquisition of 70% of Sprint Nextel.
FUND CHANGES
During the period attractive stock-specific opportunities led to changes in the portfolio’s exposures. Additions included Bayer (Germany), Genomma Lab Internacional (Mexico) and Getinge (Sweden), increasing exposure to the Health Care Sector. Purchasing Red Electrica (Spain) and RWE (Germany) increased exposure to the Utilities Sector. The fund sold positions in AXA (France), Banco do Brasil (Brazil), QBE Insurance (Australia), and Credit Suisse Group (Switzerland), reducing exposure to the Financials Sector. Selling a position in Amadeus IT Holding (Spain) and trimming other existing positions lowered holdings in Information Technology stocks. From a regional perspective, exposure to emerging markets increased by purchasing the aforementioned Genomma Lab Internacional in addition to Mediclinic International (South Africa) and Bank Mandiri (Indonesia). Purchasing Bayer, Getinge, and RWE led to increased continental Europe exposure. Lastly, the sale of British Sky Broadcasting, GlaxoSmithKline, and International Power reduced UK exposure.
27
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
MADISON TARGET RETIREMENT 2020 FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Target Retirement 2020 Fund invests primarily in shares of registered investment companies (the “underlying funds”) according to an asset allocation strategy developed by Madison Asset Management, LLC (“Madison”), the fund’s investment adviser, for investors planning to retire in or within a few years of 2020. Over time, the fund’s asset allocation will become more conservative until it reaches approximately 15-30% in stock funds and 70-85% in bond funds. The asset allocation strategy is designed to reduce the volatility of investment returns in the later years while still providing the potential for higher total returns over the target period.
On a periodic basis, Madison will evaluate and sometimes revise the fund’s asset allocations, including revising the asset class weightings and adding and/or removing underlying funds. Madison will also monitor the underlying funds on an ongoing basis and may increase or decrease the fund’s investment in one or several underlying funds. The underlying fund selections are made based on several considerations, including the fund’s style or asset class exposures, portfolio characteristics, risk profile, and investment process.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1,2
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121,2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Since | ||||||||||||||||||||
10/1/07 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | Inception | |||||||||||||||||
Ultra Series Target Retirement 2020, Class I | 9.98 | % | 6.98 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||||
Dow Jones Global Target 2020 Index | 9.23 | 7.80 | 3.32 | 3.08 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
28
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Madison Target Retirement 2020 Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | ||||||||
Bond Funds | 52 | % | ||||||
Foreign Bond Funds | 3 | % | ||||||
Stock Funds | 34 | % | ||||||
Foreign Stock Funds | 8 | % | ||||||
Money Market Funds and Other Net Assets | 3 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, the Ultra Series Target Retirement 2020 Fund returned 9.98%, ahead the benchmark Dow Jones Global Target 2020 Index return of 9.23%. The fund’s performance trailed the Morningstar Target Date 2016-2020 peer average return of 11.68%. Outperformance against the benchmark was a result of strong manager performance within the fixed income holdings, an overweight position to corporate bonds, and a slight overweight position to equities relative to the benchmark. With the S&P 500 up 16.00%, the Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index up 15.81%, and broad international indices outpacing the domestic indices, portfolios willing to take a more aggressive stance generally would have outpaced the fund’s performance. We believe that our conservative approach was the reason for underperformance compared to the Morningstar peer group, as we began the period leery of international equities given the underlying and unresolved sovereign debt crisis in Europe.
FUND CHANGES
We began the year with a sizable underweight position to international equities based on concerns over the ongoing European debt crisis. By the middle of the year, we began to increase foreign equity exposure. Our decision to increase equities exposure was a result of improved economic data and massive global central bank liquidity measures. Most notably, the decisive action by Mario Draghi and the European Central Bank, which we believed removed much of the near-term tail risk from the European markets. The increase proved timely as international equities rallied hard through the rest of the year. We remain underweight to foreign equities as we believe risks from Europe are still present.
Around the same time, with interest rates near record lows in the late summer/early fall, we significantly reduced the fund’s exchange traded fund (“ETF”) bond holdings in favor of actively managed funds. We believe the current ultra-low interest rate environment should favor active bond funds moving forward. Finally, late in the year, we began to trim the level of both investment grade and high yield credit investments in the fund. We believe that the credit markets have become fully valued and wanted to take advantage of potential profits while dampening the risk level of our fixed income holdings.
29
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
MADISON TARGET RETIREMENT 2030 FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Target Retirement 2030 Fund invests primarily in shares of registered investment companies (the “"underlying funds”) according to an asset allocation strategy developed by Madison Asset Management, LLC (“Madison”), the fund’s investment adviser, for investors planning to retire in or within a few years of 2030. Over time, the fund’s asset allocation will become more conservative until it reaches approximately 15-30% in stock funds and 70-85% in bond funds. The asset allocation strategy is designed to reduce the volatility of investment returns in the later years while still providing the potential for higher total returns over the target period.
On a periodic basis, Madison will evaluate and sometimes revise the fund’s asset allocations, including revising the asset class weightings and adding and/or removing underlying funds. Madison will also monitor the underlying funds on an ongoing basis and may increase or decrease the fund’s investment in one or several underlying funds. The underlying fund selections are made based on several considerations, including the fund’s style or asset class exposures, portfolio characteristics, risk profile, and investment process.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1,2
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121,2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Since | ||||||||||||||||||||
10/1/07 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | Inception | |||||||||||||||||
Ultra Series Target Retirement 2030, Class I | 11.05 | % | 7.17 | % | -0.13 | % | -0.61 | % | ||||||||||||
Dow Jones Global Target 2030 Index | 12.56 | 8.76 | 2.52 | 2.07 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
30
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Madison Target Retirement 2030 Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | ||||||||
Bond Funds | 36 | % | ||||||
Foreign Bond Funds | 3 | % | ||||||
Stock Funds | 48 | % | ||||||
Foreign Stock Funds | 12 | % | ||||||
Money Market Funds and Other Net Assets | 1 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, the Ultra Series Target Retirement 2030 Fund returned 11.05%, while the Dow Jones Global Target 2030 Index returned 12.56%. The fund’s performance also trailed the Morningstar Target Date 2026-2030 peer average return of 13.59%. With the S&P 500 Index up 16.00% for the year, the Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index up 15.81%, and broad international indices outpacing the domestic indices, portfolios willing to take a more aggressive stance would have likely outpaced the fund’s performance. We believe the reason for underperformance compared to the Morningstar peer group was primarily due to the fund’s relatively light equity exposure associated with our conservative approach towards the fund’s target asset allocation position.
FUND CHANGES
We began the year with a sizable underweight to international equities based on concerns over the ongoing European debt crisis. By the middle of the year, we began to increase foreign equity exposure. Our decision to increase equities exposure was a result of improved economic data and massive global central bank liquidity measures. Most notably, the decisive action by Mario Draghi and the European Central Bank, which we believed removed much of the near-term tail risk from the European markets. The increase proved timely as international equities rallied hard through the rest of the year. We remain underweighted to foreign equities as we believe risks from Europe are still present.
With interest rates near record lows in the late summer/early fall, we significantly reduced the fund’s exchange traded fund (“ETF”) bond holdings in favor of actively managed funds. We believe the current ultra-low interest rate environment should favor active bond funds moving forward. Finally, late in the year, we began to materially trim the level of both investment grade and high yield credit in the fund. We believe that the credit markets have become fully valued and wanted to take advantage of potential profits while dampening the risk level of our fixed income holdings.
31
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
MADISON TARGET RETIREMENT 2040 FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Ultra Series Target Retirement 2040 Fund invests primarily in shares of registered investment companies (the “"underlying funds”) according to an asset allocation strategy developed by Madison Asset Management, LLC (“Madison”), the fund’s investment adviser, for investors planning to retire in or within a few years of 2040. Over time, the fund’s asset allocation will become more conservative until it reaches approximately 15-30% in stock funds and 70-85% in bond funds. The asset allocation strategy is designed to reduce the volatility of investment returns in the later years while still providing the potential for higher total returns over the target period.
On a periodic basis, Madison will evaluate and sometimes revise the fund’s asset allocations, including revising the asset class weightings and adding and/or removing underlying funds. Madison will also monitor the underlying funds on an ongoing basis and may increase or decrease the fund’s investment in one or several underlying funds. The underlying fund selections are made based on several considerations, including the fund’s style or asset class exposures, portfolio characteristics, risk profile, and investment process.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1,2
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121,2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Since | ||||||||||||||||||||
10/1/07 | ||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Years | 5 Years | Inception | |||||||||||||||||
Ultra Series Target Retirement 2040, Class I | 11.42 | % | 7.17 | % | -1.11 | % | -1.60 | % | ||||||||||||
Dow Jones Global Target 2040 Index | 14.88 | 9.23 | 2.09 | 1.54 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
32
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Madison Target Retirement 2040 Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | ||||||||
Bond Funds | 26 | % | ||||||
Foreign Bond Funds | 2 | % | ||||||
Stock Funds | 56 | % | ||||||
Foreign Stock Funds | 15 | % | ||||||
Money Market Funds and Other Net Assets | 1 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2012, the Madison Target Retirement 2040 Fund returned 11.42%, while the Dow Jones Global Target 2040 Index returned 14.88%. The fund’s performance also trailed the Morningstar Target Date 2036-2040 peer average return of 14.64%. With the S&P 500 Index up 16.00%, the Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index up 15.81%, and broad international indices outpacing the domestic indices, portfolios willing to take a more aggressive stance would have likely outpaced the fund’s performance. We believe the reason for underperformance compared to the Morningstar peer group was primarily due to the fund’s relatively low equity exposure associated with our conservative approach towards the target asset allocation position.
FUND CHANGES
We began the year with a sizable underweight to international equities based on concerns over the ongoing European debt crisis. By the middle of the year, we began to increase foreign equity exposure. Our decision to increase equities exposure was a result of improved economic data and massive global central bank liquidity measures. Most notably, the decisive action by Mario Draghi and the European Central Bank, which we believed removed much of the near-term tail risk from the European markets. The increase proved timely as international equities rallied hard through the rest of the year. We remain underweighted to foreign equities as we believe risks from Europe are still very much present.
Around the same time, with interest rates near record lows in the late summer/early fall, we significantly reduced the fund’s exchange traded fund (“ETF”) bond holdings in favor of actively managed funds. We believe the current ultra-low interest rate environment should favor active bond funds moving forward. And finally, late in the year, we began to materially trim the level of both investment grade and high yield credit in the fund. We believe that the credit markets have become fully valued and wanted to take advantage of potential profits while dampening the risk level of our fixed income holdings.
33
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
MADISON TARGET RETIREMENT 2050 FUND
INVESTMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS
The Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund invests primarily in shares of registered investment companies (the “"underlying funds”) according to an asset allocation strategy developed by Madison Asset Management, LLC (“Madison”), the fund’s investment adviser, for investors planning to retire in or within a few years of 2050. Over time, the fund’s asset allocation will become more conservative until it reaches approximately 15-30% in stock funds and 70-85% in bond funds. The asset allocation strategy is designed to reduce the volatility of investment returns in the later years while still providing the potential for higher total returns over the target period.
On a periodic basis, Madison will evaluate and sometimes revise the fund’s asset allocations, including revising the asset class weightings and adding and/or removing underlying funds. Madison will also monitor the underlying funds on an ongoing basis and may increase or decrease the fund’s investment in one or several underlying funds. The underlying fund selections are made based on several considerations, including the fund’s style or asset class exposures, portfolio characteristics, risk profile, and investment process.
PERFORMANCE HISTORY
Cumulative Performance of $10,000 Investment Since Inception1,2
Average Annual Total Return through December 31, 20121,2 | ||||||||||||
Since | ||||||||||||
1/3/11 | ||||||||||||
1 Year | Inception | |||||||||||
Ultra Series Target Retirement 2050, Class I | 12.12 | % | 5.36 | % | ||||||||
Dow Jones Global Target 2050 Index | 15.35 | 4.78 |
See accompanying Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance.
34
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund (concluded)
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET ASSETS AS OF 12/31/12 | ||||||||
Bond Funds | 15 | % | ||||||
Foreign Bond Funds | 2 | % | ||||||
Stock Funds | 63 | % | ||||||
Foreign Stock Funds | 18 | % | ||||||
Money Market Funds and Other Net Assets | 2 | % |
PERFORMANCE DISCUSSION
The Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund returned 12.12%, while the Dow Jones Global Target 2050 Index returned 15.35% and the Morningstar Target 2046-2050 Category returned 15.07%. With the S&P 500 up 16.00%, the Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index up 15.81%, and broad international indices outpacing the domestic indices, portfolios willing to take a more aggressive stance would have likely outpaced the fund’s performance. We believe the reason for the fund’s underperformance compared to the Morningstar peer group was primarily due to the fund’s relatively light equity exposure associated with our conservative approach towards the fund’s target asset allocation position.
FUND CHANGES
We began the year with a sizable underweight to international equities based on concerns over the ongoing European debt crisis. By the middle of the year we began to increase foreign equity exposure. Our decision to increase equities exposure was a result of improved economic data and massive global central bank liquidity measures. Most notably, the decisive action by Mario Draghi and the European Central Bank, which we believed removed much of the near-term tail risk from the European markets. The increase proved timely as international equities rallied hard through the rest of the year. We remain underweighted to foreign equities as we believe risks from Europe are still present.
Around the same time, with interest rates near record lows in the late summer/early fall, we significantly reduced the fund’s exchange traded fund (“ETF”) bond holdings in favor of actively managed funds. We believe the current ultra-low interest rate environment should favor active bond funds moving forward. Finally, late in the year, we began to materially trim the level of both investment grade and high yield credit in the fund. We believe that the credit markets have become fully valued and wanted to take advantage of potential profits while dampening the risk level of our fixed income holdings.
35
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Notes to Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance
1 | Fund returns are calculated after fund level expenses have been subtracted, but do not include any separate account fees, charges or expenses imposed by the variable annuity and variable life insurance contracts that invest in the fund, as described in the Prospectus. If these fees, charges, or expenses were included, fund returns would have been lower. Fund returns also assume that dividends and capital gains are reinvested in additional shares of the fund. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate, so an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than when purchased. Further information relating to the fund’s performance is contained in the Prospectus and elsewhere in this report. The fund’s past performance is not indicative of future performance. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data cited. For Ultra Series Fund performance data current to the most recent month-end, please call 1-800-670-3600 or visit www.ultraseriesfund.com. Indices are unmanaged and investors cannot invest in them directly. Index returns do not reflect fees or expenses. |
2 | The management fee for the Conservative, Moderate, and Aggressive Allocation Funds was reduced from June 30, 2006-April 30, 2008. Effective October 1, 2009, Madison contractually agreed to waive a portion of the management fee of the Target Retirement Date 2020, 2030 and 2040 Funds from 0.40% to 0.20%. Effective February 17, 2011, the fee was permanently reduced to 0.20%. On September 1, 2011, shareholders of the Target Retirement Date Funds approved a new fee arrangement which includes an investment advisory fee of 0.25% annualized and a services agreement fee of 0.05% annualized. If the management fees had not been reduced, returns would have been lower. |
Morningstar Percentile rankings note: 1st percentile is top, 99th percentile is bottom.
©Morningstar, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Morningstar related information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information.
BENCHMARK DESCRIPTIONS
Allocation Fund Indexes
The Conservative Allocation Fund Custom Index consists of 65% Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government and Mortgage Index, 30% Russell 3000® Index and 5% MSCI EAFE Index. See market indexes descriptions below.
The Moderate Allocation Fund Custom Index consists of 40% Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government and Mortgage Index, 45% Russell 3000® Index and 15% MSCI EAFE Index. See market indexes descriptions below.
The Aggressive Allocation Fund Custom Index consists of 15% Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government and Mortgage Index, 55% Russell 3000® Index and 30% MSCI EAFE Index. See market indexes descriptions below.
Hybrid Fund Indexes
The Custom Blended Index consists of 50% S&P 500 Index and 50% Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index. See market indexes' descriptions below.
Market Indexes
The Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index is a broad-based measure of the total rate of return performance of the U.S. investment-grade bond markets. The index is a capitalization-weighted aggregation of outstanding U.S. treasury, agency and supranational mortgage pass-through, and investment-grade corporate bonds meeting specified selection criteria.
36
Ultra Series Fund | Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance | December 31, 2012
Benchmark Descriptions - Market Indexes (concluded)
The Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master II Constrained Index tracks the performance of below investment grade U.S. dollar denominated corporate bonds publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market, but limits any individual issuer to a maximum weighting of 2%.
The Dow Jones Global Target 2020 Index is a benchmark for multi-asset class portfolios with risk profiles that become more conservative as the year 2020 approaches. The index is a composite of other indexes that represent stocks, bonds and cash.
The Dow Jones Global Target 2030 Index is a benchmark for multi-asset class portfolios with risk profiles that become more conservative as the year 2030 approaches. The index is a composite of other indexes that represent stocks, bonds and cash.
The Dow Jones Global Target 2040 Index is a benchmark for multi-asset class portfolios with risk profiles that become more conservative as the year 2040 approaches. The index is a composite of other indexes that represent stocks, bonds and cash.
The Dow Jones Global Target 2050 Index is a benchmark for multi-asset class portfolios with risk profiles that become more conservative as the year 2050 approaches. The index is a composite of other indexes that represent stocks, bonds and cash.
The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia & Far East) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index (net) is calculated on a total return basis with dividends reinvested after the deduction of withholding taxes.
The Russell 1000® Index is a large-cap market index which measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000® Index (see definition below).
The Russell 1000® Growth Index is a large-cap market index which measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000® Value Index is a large-cap market index which measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 2000® Index is a small-cap market index which measures the performance of the smallest 2,000 companies in the Russell 3000® Index (see definition below.)
The Russell 3000® Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents 98% of the investable U.S. equity market.
The Russell Midcap® Index is a mid-cap market index which measures the performance of the mid-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe.
The S&P 500 Index is a large-cap market index which measures the performance of a representative sample of 500 leading companies in leading industries in the U.S.
37
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Conservative Allocation Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 99.9% | |||||
Bond Funds - 60.3% | |||||
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 719,654 | $ | 8,153,676 | ||
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Advisor Class | 1,700,520 | 15,525,747 | |||
Madison Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund (A) | 1,277,935 | 14,913,498 | |||
Madison Mosaic Institutional Bond Fund (A) | 1,641,621 | 18,402,574 | |||
MEMBERS Bond Fund Class Y (A) | 1,904,243 | 20,127,845 | |||
MEMBERS High Income Fund Class Y (A) | 1,737,052 | 12,350,442 | |||
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 2,055,086 | 22,379,889 | |||
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Class | 846,139 | 9,409,067 | |||
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | 1,991,300 | 22,382,215 | |||
143,644,953 | |||||
Foreign Bond Funds - 6.5% | |||||
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund Class I | 1,017,849 | 9,486,351 | |||
Templeton Global Bond Fund Advisor Class | 449,078 | 5,990,696 | |||
15,477,047 | |||||
Foreign Stock Funds - 5.9% | |||||
MEMBERS International Stock Fund Class Y (A) | 592,560 | 6,695,928 | |||
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 163,158 | 7,464,479 | |||
14,160,407 | |||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Money Market Funds - 1.6% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 3,739,633 | $ | 3,739,633 | ||
Stock Funds - 25.6% | |||||
iShares Russell Midcap Index Fund | 52,696 | 5,959,918 | |||
iShares S&P 100 Index Fund ETF | 109,518 | 7,083,624 | |||
Madison Mosaic Disciplined Equity Fund (A) | 980,883 | 13,124,209 | |||
MEMBERS Equity Income Fund Class Y (A) | 958,772 | 9,271,324 | |||
MEMBERS Large Cap Growth Fund Class Y (A) | 407,511 | 7,098,844 | |||
MEMBERS Large Cap Value Fund Class Y (A) | 1,076,398 | 14,843,529 | |||
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 59,607 | 3,550,789 | |||
60,932,237 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.9% (Cost $222,364,188**) | 237,954,277 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.1% | 262,330 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 238,216,607 | |||
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $224,385,052. |
(A) | Affiliated Company (see Note 10). |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Moderate Allocation Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 99.3% | |||||
Bond Funds - 36.7% | |||||
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 1,048,861 | $ | 11,883,593 | ||
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Advisor Class | 2,382,356 | 21,750,911 | |||
Madison Mosaic Institutional Bond Fund (A) | 1,393,750 | 15,623,934 | |||
MEMBERS Bond Fund Class Y (A) | 2,405,616 | 25,427,362 | |||
MEMBERS High Income Fund Class Y (A) | 2,455,877 | 17,461,282 | |||
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 3,540,055 | 38,551,204 | |||
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Class | 1,224,971 | 13,621,675 | |||
144,319,961 | |||||
Foreign Bond Funds - 3.1% | |||||
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund Class I | 1,305,762 | 12,169,702 | |||
Foreign Stock Funds - 11.5% | |||||
Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund Institutional Shares | 316,920 | 5,894,713 | |||
MEMBERS International Stock Fund Class Y (A) | 708,463 | 8,005,628 | |||
NorthRoad International Fund Class Y (A) | 1,378,003 | 14,317,452 | |||
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 323,701 | 14,809,321 | |||
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund ETF | 55,233 | 2,036,993 | |||
45,064,107 | |||||
Money Market Funds - 1.1% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 4,421,329 | 4,421,329 | |||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Stock Funds - 46.9% | |||||
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 48,734 | $ | 4,956,248 | ||
iShares S&P 100 Index Fund ETF | 213,507 | 13,809,633 | |||
iShares S&P Global Energy Sector Index Fund ETF | 50,688 | 1,938,816 | |||
Madison Mosaic Disciplined Equity Fund (A) | 2,220,189 | 29,706,124 | |||
MEMBERS Equity Income Fund Class Y (A) | 1,319,334 | 12,757,964 | |||
MEMBERS Large Cap Growth Fund Class Y (A) | 1,513,868 | 26,371,588 | |||
MEMBERS Large Cap Value Fund Class Y (A) | 2,356,806 | 32,500,352 | |||
MEMBERS Mid Cap Fund Class Y (A) * | 2,263,279 | 17,812,004 | |||
MEMBERS Small Cap Fund Class Y (A) | 619,710 | 7,244,407 | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index Fund | 2,647,531 | 28,434,482 | |||
Vanguard Health Care ETF | 54,251 | 3,888,169 | |||
Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 70,910 | 4,900,590 | |||
184,320,377 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.3% (Cost $351,324,878**) | 390,295,476 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.7% | 2,762,997 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 393,058,473 | |||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $355,477,443. |
(A) | Affiliated Company (see Note 10). |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Aggressive Allocation Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 99.8% | |||||
Bond Funds - 12.7% | |||||
MEMBERS High Income Fund Class Y (A) | 429,563 | $ | 3,054,190 | ||
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 1,146,245 | 12,482,602 | |||
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Class | 260,402 | 2,895,675 | |||
18,432,467 | |||||
Foreign Bond Funds - 0.5% | |||||
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund Class I | 79,680 | 742,616 | |||
Foreign Stock Funds - 18.3% | |||||
Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF | 20,701 | 1,092,185 | |||
Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 27,102 | 1,257,262 | |||
Matthews Asian Growth and Income Fund Institutional Shares | 230,835 | 4,293,530 | |||
MEMBERS International Stock Fund Class Y (A) | 321,305 | 3,630,741 | |||
NorthRoad International Fund Class Y (A) | 492,632 | 5,118,451 | |||
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 192,953 | 8,827,600 | |||
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund ETF | 60,439 | 2,228,990 | |||
26,448,759 | |||||
Money Market Funds - 1.6% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 2,375,855 | 2,375,855 | |||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Stock Funds - 66.7% | |||||
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 21,468 | $ | 2,183,296 | ||
iShares S&P 100 Index Fund ETF | 122,897 | 7,948,978 | |||
iShares S&P Global Energy Sector Index Fund ETF | 36,809 | 1,407,944 | |||
Madison Mosaic Disciplined Equity Fund (A) | 1,236,305 | 16,541,758 | |||
MEMBERS Equity Income Fund Class Y (A) | 333,863 | 3,228,452 | |||
MEMBERS Large Cap Growth Fund Class Y (A) | 618,663 | 10,777,117 | |||
MEMBERS Large Cap Value Fund Class Y (A) | 1,180,844 | 16,283,838 | |||
MEMBERS Mid Cap Fund Class Y (A) * | 1,544,805 | 12,157,615 | |||
MEMBERS Small Cap Fund Class Y (A) | 255,585 | 2,987,791 | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index Fund | 1,470,319 | 15,791,229 | |||
Vanguard Health Care ETF | 39,782 | 2,851,176 | |||
Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 61,691 | 4,263,465 | |||
96,422,659 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.8% (Cost $127,681,907**) | 144,422,356 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.2% | 253,063 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 144,675,419 | |||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $129,719,193. |
(A) | Affiliated Company (see Note 10). |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Money Market Fund Portfolio of Investments
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AND AGENCY OBLIGATIONS - 74.9% | |||||
Fannie Mae - 16.9% | |||||
0.132%, 1/30/13 (A) | $ | 428,000 | $ | 427,955 | |
3.625%, 2/12/13 | 500,000 | 501,970 | |||
0.135%, 2/13/13 (A) | 550,000 | 549,911 | |||
4.750%, 2/21/13 | 1,647,000 | 1,657,467 | |||
1.750%, 2/22/13 | 750,000 | 751,684 | |||
4.250%, 2/25/13 | 400,000 | 402,438 | |||
0.750%, 2/26/13 | 1,297,000 | 1,298,231 | |||
0.122%, 3/6/13 (A) | 1,600,000 | 1,599,659 | |||
4.375%, 3/15/13 | 1,287,000 | 1,298,125 | |||
8,487,440 | |||||
Federal Farm Credit Bank - 4.8% | |||||
0.140%, 1/28/13 (A) | 100,000 | 99,999 | |||
2.150%, 2/4/13 | 735,000 | 736,371 | |||
3.400%, 2/7/13 | 1,110,000 | 1,113,568 | |||
1.750%, 2/21/13 | 300,000 | 300,667 | |||
4.500%, 2/25/13 | 144,000 | 144,934 | |||
2,395,539 | |||||
Federal Home Loan Bank - 22.9% | |||||
0.122%, 1/2/13 (A) | 100,000 | 100,000 | |||
0.101%, 1/4/13 (A) | 200,000 | 199,998 | |||
0.210%, 1/4/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,007 | |||
0.112%, 1/9/13 (A) | 575,000 | 574,986 | |||
0.180%, 1/9/13 | 200,000 | 200,001 | |||
1.500%, 1/16/13 | 1,105,000 | 1,105,604 | |||
0.170%, 1/17/13 | 200,000 | 200,001 | |||
0.129%, 1/23/13 (A) | 1,100,000 | 1,099,913 | |||
0.020%, 1/30/13 (A) | 1,400,000 | 1,399,977 | |||
0.119%, 2/1/13 (A) | 958,000 | 957,909 | |||
0.136%, 2/5/13 (A) | 400,000 | 399,949 | |||
0.150%, 2/6/13 | 600,000 | 600,020 | |||
0.170%, 2/11/13 | 500,000 | 500,017 | |||
0.180%, 2/15/13 | 125,000 | 125,007 | |||
0.079%, 2/20/13 (A) | 1,043,000 | 1,042,914 | |||
0.125%, 3/5/13 (A) | 400,000 | 399,986 | |||
5.000%, 3/8/13 | 750,000 | 756,663 | |||
0.130%, 3/14/13 (A) | 700,000 | 699,820 | |||
0.300%, 3/19/13 | 160,000 | 160,061 | |||
11,522,833 | |||||
Freddie Mac - 22.3% | |||||
0.122%, 1/3/13 (A) | 500,000 | 499,997 | |||
0.101%, 1/7/13 (A) | 210,000 | 209,996 | |||
1.375%, 1/9/13 | 1,375,000 | 1,375,366 | |||
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
0.152%, 1/14/13 (A) | $ | 305,000 | $ | 304,983 | |
0.132%, 1/22/13 (A) | 250,000 | 249,981 | |||
0.167%, 1/28/13 (A) | 2,550,000 | 2,549,675 | |||
0.142%, 2/19/13 (A) | 400,000 | 399,924 | |||
0.128%, 2/25/13 (A) | 1,500,000 | 1,499,725 | |||
0.041%, 2/27/13 (A) | 1,250,000 | 1,249,921 | |||
0.032%, 3/5/13 (A) | 500,000 | 499,972 | |||
0.091%, 3/18/13 (A) | 2,000,000 | 1,999,620 | |||
1.720%, 4/11/13 | 400,000 | 401,732 | |||
11,240,892 | |||||
U.S. Treasury Notes - 8.0% | |||||
1.375%, 1/15/13 | 3,000,000 | 3,001,428 | |||
0.625%, 1/31/13 | 550,000 | 550,221 | |||
2.750%, 2/28/13 | 500,000 | 502,105 | |||
4,053,754 | |||||
Total U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (Cost $37,700,458) | 37,700,458 | ||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS - 19.8% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary - 0.2% | |||||
McDonald’s Corp., 4.3%, 3/1/13 | 100,000 | 100,654 | |||
Consumer Staples - 6.1% | |||||
Coca-Cola Co. (A), 0.162%, 3/4/13 | 1,000,000 | 999,725 | |||
PepsiCo Inc., 4.65%, 2/15/13 | 720,000 | 723,767 | |||
Proctor & Gamble Co. (A), 0.162%, 2/12/13 | 1,350,000 | 1,349,748 | |||
3,073,240 | |||||
Financials - 9.9% | |||||
Bank One Corp., 5.25%, 1/30/13 | 500,000 | 501,879 | |||
John Deere Bank S.A. (A), 0.172%, 1/17/13 | 1,000,000 | 999,925 | |||
John Deere Bank S.A. (A), 0.172%, 1/23/13 | 500,000 | 499,948 | |||
John Deere Bank S.A. (A), 0.162%, 1/24/13 | 500,000 | 499,949 | |||
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 5.75%, 1/2/13 | 300,000 | 300,041 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co., 4.375%, 1/31/13 | 150,000 | 150,493 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. (A), 0.142%, 2/25/13 | 1,000,000 | 999,786 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. (A), 0.142%, 3/7/13 | 1,000,000 | 999,747 | |||
4,951,768 | |||||
Industrials - 2.2% | |||||
Emerson Electric Co. (A), 0.152%, 1/17/13 | 1,000,000 | 999,934 | |||
General Electric Capital Corp. (A), 0.203%, 1/4/13 | 100,000 | 99,998 | |||
1,099,932 | |||||
Information Technology - 1.4% | |||||
Oracle Corp., 4.95%, 4/15/13 | 700,000 | 709,098 | |||
Total Short-Term Investments (Cost $9,934,692) | 9,934,692 |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Money Market Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 4.9% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 2,476,374 | $ | 2,476,374 | ||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $2,476,374) | 2,476,374 | ||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.6% (Cost $50,111,524**) | 50,111,524 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.4% | 212,153 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 50,323,677 | |||
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $50,111,524. |
(A) | Rate noted represents annualized yield at time of purchase. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Bond Fund Portfolio of Investments
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES - 0.9% | |||||
ABSC Long Beach Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2000-LB1, Class AF5 (A), 8.55%, 9/21/30 | $ | 652,045 | $ | 660,454 | |
New Century Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2003-5, Class AI5 (B), 5.5%, 11/25/33 | 2,799,669 | 2,815,790 | |||
Total Asset Backed Securities (Cost $3,472,353) | 3,476,244 | ||||
CORPORATE NOTES AND BONDS - 27.5% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary - 2.6% | |||||
American Association of Retired Persons (C) (D), 7.5%, 5/1/31 | 2,500,000 | 3,466,302 | |||
DR Horton Inc., 5.25%, 2/15/15 | 1,140,000 | 1,199,850 | |||
ERAC USA Finance LLC (C) (D), 6.7%, 6/1/34 | 4,400,000 | 5,327,472 | |||
9,993,624 | |||||
Consumer Staples - 1.1% | |||||
PepsiCo Inc., 4.65%, 2/15/13 | 1,165,000 | 1,171,372 | |||
WM Wrigley Jr. Co. (C) (D), 3.05%, 6/28/13 | 3,170,000 | 3,207,625 | |||
4,378,997 | |||||
Energy - 2.8% | |||||
Hess Corp., 7.875%, 10/1/29 | 2,460,000 | 3,420,369 | |||
Transocean Inc., 6%, 3/15/18 | 1,400,000 | 1,623,705 | |||
Transocean Inc., 7.5%, 4/15/31 | 2,310,000 | 2,870,794 | |||
Valero Energy Corp., 7.5%, 4/15/32 | 2,275,000 | 2,918,832 | |||
10,833,700 | |||||
Financials - 2.6% | |||||
American Express Credit Corp., 2.375%, 3/24/17 | 1,080,000 | 1,130,022 | |||
HCP Inc., 6.7%, 1/30/18 | 2,725,000 | 3,286,590 | |||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (E) *, 5.75%, 1/3/17 | 3,135,000 | 314 | |||
Simon Property Group L.P., 5.875%, 3/1/17 | 1,060,000 | 1,255,035 | |||
Swiss Re Solutions Holding Corp., 7%, 2/15/26 | 1,250,000 | 1,589,066 | |||
UBS AG (F), 5.75%, 4/25/18 | 750,000 | 890,357 | |||
US Bank NA, 6.3%, 2/4/14 | 2,000,000 | 2,120,934 | |||
10,272,318 | |||||
Health Care - 4.5% | |||||
Eli Lilly & Co., 6.57%, 1/1/16 | 2,600,000 | 2,991,521 | |||
Genentech Inc., 5.25%, 7/15/35 | 1,740,000 | 2,097,672 | |||
Merck & Co. Inc., 5.75%, 11/15/36 | 3,960,000 | 5,236,209 | |||
Quest Diagnostics Inc., 5.45%, 11/1/15 | 3,500,000 | 3,886,330 | |||
Wyeth LLC, 6.5%, 2/1/34 | 2,370,000 | 3,239,873 | |||
17,451,605 | |||||
Industrials - 4.9% | |||||
Boeing Co./The, 8.625%, 11/15/31 | 760,000 | 1,179,939 | |||
Boeing Co./The, 6.875%, 10/15/43 | 1,380,000 | 1,945,629 | |||
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC, 8.125%, 4/15/20 | $ | 2,925,000 | $ | 3,881,882 | |
EI du Pont de Nemours & Co., 5%, 1/15/13 | 195,000 | 195,305 | |||
General Electric Capital Corp., 3.35%, 10/17/16 | 3,200,000 | 3,434,835 | |||
Lockheed Martin Corp., 7.65%, 5/1/16 | 1,450,000 | 1,755,969 | |||
Norfolk Southern Corp., 5.59%, 5/17/25 | 1,268,000 | 1,557,176 | |||
Norfolk Southern Corp., 7.05%, 5/1/37 | 1,400,000 | 1,989,585 | |||
Waste Management Inc., 7.125%, 12/15/17 | 2,465,000 | 2,997,026 | |||
18,937,346 | |||||
Information Technology - 0.7% | |||||
Cisco Systems Inc., 5.5%, 2/22/16 | 2,400,000 | 2,743,332 | |||
Materials - 1.7% | |||||
Westvaco Corp., 8.2%, 1/15/30 | 2,250,000 | 2,968,724 | |||
Weyerhaeuser Co., 7.375%, 3/15/32 | 3,000,000 | 3,780,225 | |||
6,748,949 | |||||
Telecommunication Services - 2.0% | |||||
Comcast Cable Communications Holdings Inc., 9.455%, 11/15/22 | 3,080,000 | 4,656,526 | |||
Rogers Communications Inc. (F), 6.25%, 6/15/13 | 3,000,000 | 3,077,292 | |||
7,733,818 | |||||
Utilities - 4.6% | |||||
Indianapolis Power & Light Co. (C) (D), 6.05%, 10/1/36 | 3,445,000 | 4,176,528 | |||
Interstate Power & Light Co., 6.25%, 7/15/39 | 2,925,000 | 3,836,942 | |||
Sierra Pacific Power Co., Series M, 6%, 5/15/16 | 3,250,000 | 3,761,300 | |||
Southwestern Electric Power Co., Series E, 5.55%, 1/15/17 | 2,165,000 | 2,442,014 | |||
Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 6.5%, 6/1/28 | 3,000,000 | 3,787,149 | |||
18,003,933 | |||||
Total Corporate Notes and Bonds (Cost $94,785,082) | 107,097,622 | ||||
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES - 16.2% | |||||
Fannie Mae - 13.7% | |||||
4%, 4/1/15 Pool # 255719 | 379,601 | 406,596 | |||
5.5%, 4/1/16 Pool # 745444 | 682,655 | 733,677 | |||
6%, 5/1/16 Pool # 582558 | 36,660 | 38,962 | |||
5.5%, 9/1/17 Pool # 657335 | 96,624 | 104,035 | |||
5.5%, 2/1/18 Pool # 673194 | 340,731 | 367,012 | |||
5%, 5/1/20 Pool # 813965 | 1,246,066 | 1,360,769 | |||
4.5%, 9/1/20 Pool # 835465 | 933,122 | 1,005,312 | |||
6%, 5/1/21 Pool # 253847 | 137,543 | 151,142 | |||
7%, 12/1/29 Pool # 762813 | 106,896 | 124,576 | |||
7%, 11/1/31 Pool # 607515 | 75,522 | 90,233 | |||
6.5%, 3/1/32 Pool # 631377 | 194,524 | 220,741 | |||
7%, 4/1/32 Pool # 641518 | 4,876 | 5,819 | |||
7%, 5/1/32 Pool # 644591 | 98,120 | 117,233 |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Bond Fund Portfolio of Investments
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES (continued) | |||||
Fannie Mae (continued) | |||||
6.5%, 6/1/32 Pool # 545691 | $ | 1,126,604 | $ | 1,283,331 | |
5.5%, 4/1/33 Pool # 690206 | 1,439,349 | 1,581,886 | |||
5%, 10/1/33 Pool # 254903 | 2,010,627 | 2,190,574 | |||
5.5%, 11/1/33 Pool # 555880 | 1,666,965 | 1,832,043 | |||
5%, 5/1/34 Pool # 782214 | 59,025 | 64,160 | |||
5%, 6/1/34 Pool # 778891 | 494,158 | 537,149 | |||
5.5%, 6/1/34 Pool # 780384 | 1,818,203 | 1,989,168 | |||
7%, 7/1/34 Pool # 792636 | 42,248 | 48,412 | |||
5.5%, 8/1/34 Pool # 793647 | 259,938 | 292,584 | |||
5.5%, 3/1/35 Pool # 810075 | 958,372 | 1,048,887 | |||
5.5%, 3/1/35 Pool # 815976 | 1,294,109 | 1,416,333 | |||
5.5%, 7/1/35 Pool # 825283 | 1,312,833 | 1,437,262 | |||
5%, 8/1/35 Pool # 829670 | 1,537,205 | 1,669,018 | |||
5.5%, 8/1/35 Pool # 826872 | 793,858 | 868,091 | |||
5%, 9/1/35 Pool # 820347 | 1,631,520 | 1,847,897 | |||
5%, 9/1/35 Pool # 835699 | 1,577,080 | 1,786,237 | |||
5%, 10/1/35 Pool # 797669 | 2,196,046 | 2,473,567 | |||
5.5%, 10/1/35 Pool # 836912 | 128,499 | 140,455 | |||
5%, 11/1/35 Pool # 844809 | 964,192 | 1,046,870 | |||
5%, 12/1/35 Pool # 850561 | 1,058,250 | 1,148,992 | |||
5.5%, 2/1/36 Pool # 851330 | 245,879 | 269,084 | |||
5.5%, 10/1/36 Pool # 896340 | 336,406 | 366,808 | |||
5.5%, 10/1/36 Pool # 901723 | 1,855,026 | 2,017,859 | |||
6.5%, 10/1/36 Pool # 894118 | 1,377,630 | 1,558,398 | |||
6%, 11/1/36 Pool # 902510 | 2,108,180 | 2,364,715 | |||
5.5%, 2/1/37 Pool # 905140 | 1,632,698 | 1,837,751 | |||
5.5%, 5/1/37 Pool # 899323 | 957,162 | 1,044,471 | |||
5.5%, 5/1/37 Pool # 928292 | 973,696 | 1,095,984 | |||
6%, 10/1/37 Pool # 947563 | 2,010,020 | 2,254,611 | |||
5.5%, 7/1/38 Pool # 986973 | 1,299,679 | 1,435,168 | |||
5%, 8/1/38 Pool # 988934 | 2,691,675 | 2,951,922 | |||
6.5%, 8/1/38 Pool # 987711 | 2,369,386 | 2,817,900 | |||
3.5%, 6/1/42 Pool # AO4136 | 3,795,828 | 4,058,431 | |||
53,502,125 | |||||
Freddie Mac - 2.4% | |||||
5%, 5/1/18 Pool # E96322 | 693,180 | 745,779 | |||
8%, 6/1/30 Pool # C01005 | 53,693 | 66,426 | |||
7%, 3/1/31 Pool # C48129 | 218,655 | 257,732 | |||
5%, 7/1/33 Pool # A11325 | 1,226,603 | 1,368,197 | |||
6%, 10/1/34 Pool # A28439 | 275,683 | 303,285 | |||
6%, 10/1/34 Pool # A28598 | 187,975 | 206,796 | |||
5.5%, 11/1/34 Pool # A28282 | 2,464,371 | 2,763,094 | |||
5%, 4/1/35 Pool # A32314 | 351,693 | 393,830 | |||
5%, 4/1/35 Pool # A32315 | 556,231 | 612,444 | |||
5%, 4/1/35 Pool # A32316 | 768,925 | 865,856 | |||
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
5%, 4/1/35 Pool # A32509 | $ | 198,149 | $ | 218,174 | |
5%, 1/1/37 Pool # A56371 | 1,547,515 | 1,666,671 | |||
9,468,284 | |||||
Ginnie Mae - 0.1% | |||||
8%, 10/20/15 Pool # 2995 | 24,876 | 26,555 | |||
6.5%, 2/20/29 Pool # 2714 | 127,063 | 146,164 | |||
6.5%, 4/20/31 Pool # 3068 | 99,235 | 114,091 | |||
286,810 | |||||
Total Mortgage Backed Securities (Cost $57,109,291) | 63,257,219 | ||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AND AGENCY OBLIGATIONS - 51.2% | |||||
Fannie Mae - 1.1% | |||||
4.625%, 10/15/14 | 3,905,000 | 4,207,161 | |||
Federal Farm Credit Bank - 1.2% | |||||
5.875%, 10/3/16 | 4,000,000 | 4,772,500 | |||
Freddie Mac - 2.4% | |||||
4.875%, 11/15/13 | 2,500,000 | 2,603,268 | |||
4.500%, 1/15/14 | 5,500,000 | 5,744,326 | |||
1.000%, 9/29/17 | 1,000,000 | 1,010,507 | |||
9,358,101 | |||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds - 4.3% | |||||
6.625%, 2/15/27 | 7,350,000 | 11,306,365 | |||
4.500%, 5/15/38 | 4,000,000 | 5,287,500 | |||
16,593,865 | |||||
U.S. Treasury Notes - 42.2% | |||||
3.625%, 5/15/13 | 4,000,000 | 4,051,564 | |||
3.125%, 8/31/13 | 2,710,000 | 2,762,718 | |||
4.000%, 2/15/14 | 9,500,000 | 9,902,639 | |||
4.250%, 8/15/14 | 11,200,000 | 11,925,379 | |||
2.375%, 9/30/14 | 3,600,000 | 3,733,592 | |||
2.625%, 12/31/14 | 26,000,000 | 27,226,888 | |||
2.500%, 3/31/15 | 1,750,000 | 1,836,954 | |||
4.250%, 8/15/15 | 8,900,000 | 9,805,993 | |||
3.250%, 12/31/16 | 8,000,000 | 8,860,000 | |||
3.125%, 1/31/17 | 4,000,000 | 4,415,936 | |||
2.375%, 7/31/17 | 5,250,000 | 5,661,385 | |||
0.750%, 10/31/17 | 13,000,000 | 13,042,653 | |||
4.250%, 11/15/17 | 9,100,000 | 10,655,536 | |||
2.750%, 2/15/19 | 16,750,000 | 18,546,705 | |||
3.375%, 11/15/19 | 15,000,000 | 17,246,490 | |||
2.625%, 11/15/20 | 6,500,000 | 7,133,750 | |||
2.000%, 11/15/21 | 7,500,000 | 7,784,183 | |||
164,592,365 | |||||
Total U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (Cost $184,704,850) | 199,523,992 |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Bond Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 3.4% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 13,441,891 | $ | 13,441,891 | ||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $13,441,891) | 13,441,891 | ||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.2% (Cost $353,513,467**) | 386,796,968 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.8% | 2,993,956 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 389,790,924 | |||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $353,550,521. |
(A) | Stepped rate security. Rate shown is as of December 31, 2012. |
(B) | Floating rate or variable rate note. Rate shown is as of December 31, 2012. |
(C) | Security sold within terms of a private placement memorandum exempt from registration under section 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may be sold only to dealers in that program or other “qualified institutional investors.” |
(D) | Illiquid security (See Note 2). |
(E) | In default. Issuer is bankrupt. |
(F) | Notes and bonds, issued by foreign entities, denominated in U.S. dollars. The aggregate of these securities is 1.02% of total net assets. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
High Income Fund Portfolio of Investments
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
CORPORATE NOTES AND BONDS - 94.0% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary - 34.9% | |||||
Auto Components - 3.9% | |||||
Allison Transmission Inc. (A), 7.125%, 5/15/19 | $ | 300,000 | $ | 320,250 | |
American Axle & Manufacturing Inc., 7.875%, 3/1/17 | 750,000 | 776,250 | |||
Dana Holding Corp., 6.5%, 2/15/19 | 350,000 | 373,625 | |||
Dana Holding Corp., 6.75%, 2/15/21 | 250,000 | 268,750 | |||
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 7%, 5/15/22 | 500,000 | 536,250 | |||
Tenneco Inc., 6.875%, 12/15/20 | 325,000 | 353,844 | |||
2,628,969 | |||||
Automobiles - 0.4% | |||||
Cooper Standard Automotive Inc., 8.5%, 5/1/18 | 250,000 | 268,750 | |||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure - 6.2% | |||||
Ameristar Casinos Inc., 7.5%, 4/15/21 | 800,000 | 867,000 | |||
Boyd Acquisition Sub LLC / Boyd Acquisition Finance Corp. (A), 8.375%, 2/15/18 | 200,000 | 208,000 | |||
Boyd Gaming Corp., 7.125%, 2/1/16 | 150,000 | 147,000 | |||
Boyd Gaming Corp., 9.125%, 12/1/18 | 500,000 | 510,000 | |||
Felcor Lodging L.P., 6.75%, 6/1/19 | 950,000 | 1,009,375 | |||
MGM Resorts International, 7.5%, 6/1/16 | 250,000 | 268,125 | |||
MGM Resorts International, 7.625%, 1/15/17 | 500,000 | 535,000 | |||
Pinnacle Entertainment Inc., 8.75%, 5/15/20 | 300,000 | 324,000 | |||
Scientific Games International Inc. (A), 6.25%, 9/1/20 | 300,000 | 309,750 | |||
4,178,250 | |||||
Household Durables - 1.6% | |||||
Griffon Corp., 7.125%, 4/1/18 | 500,000 | 530,000 | |||
Spectrum Brands Holdings Inc., 9.5%, 6/15/18 | 500,000 | 567,500 | |||
1,097,500 | |||||
Media - 16.6% | |||||
Allbritton Communications Co., 8%, 5/15/18 | 950,000 | 1,030,750 | |||
AMC Networks Inc., 4.75%, 12/15/22 | 700,000 | 703,500 | |||
Cablevision Systems Corp., 7.75%, 4/15/18 | 250,000 | 278,125 | |||
Cablevision Systems Corp., 5.875%, 9/15/22 | 200,000 | 200,250 | |||
CCO Holdings LLC / CCO Holdings Capital Corp., 6.5%, 4/30/21 | 750,000 | 809,062 | |||
Cequel Communications Holdings I LLC / Cequel Capital Corp. (A), 8.625%, 11/15/17 | 142,000 | 151,940 | |||
Cequel Communications Holdings I LLC / Cequel Capital Corp. (A), 6.375%, 9/15/20 | 400,000 | 416,500 | |||
CSC Holdings LLC (A), 6.75%, 11/15/21 | 400,000 | 443,500 | |||
Cumulus Media Holdings Inc., 7.75%, 5/1/19 | 900,000 | 884,250 | |||
DISH DBS Corp., 5.875%, 7/15/22 | 100,000 | 107,500 | |||
DISH DBS Corp. (A), 5%, 3/15/23 | 300,000 | 300,000 | |||
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Hughes Satellite Systems Corp., 6.5%, 6/15/19 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 551,250 | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A. (A) (B), 7.25%, 10/15/20 | 325,000 | 352,625 | |||
Intelsat Jackson Holdings S.A. (B), 7.5%, 4/1/21 | 250,000 | 275,625 | |||
Intelsat Luxembourg S.A., PIK (B), 11.5%, 2/4/17 | 375,000 | 398,438 | |||
Lamar Media Corp., 5.875%, 2/1/22 | 500,000 | 542,500 | |||
Mediacom Broadband LLC / Mediacom Broadband Corp. (A), 6.375%, 4/1/23 | 800,000 | 814,000 | |||
Telesat Canada / Telesat LLC (A) (B), 6%, 5/15/17 | 500,000 | 525,000 | |||
UPCB Finance V Ltd. (A) (B), 6.875%, 1/15/22 | 350,000 | 378,875 | |||
Videotron Ltee (B), 5%, 7/15/22 | 750,000 | 786,562 | |||
Virgin Media Finance PLC (B), 4.875%, 2/15/22 | 600,000 | 613,500 | |||
XM Satellite Radio Inc. (A), 7.625%, 11/1/18 | 500,000 | 557,500 | |||
11,121,252 | |||||
Specialty Retail - 4.2% | |||||
Jo-Ann Stores Inc. (A), 8.125%, 3/15/19 | 600,000 | 610,500 | |||
Michaels Stores Inc., 7.75%, 11/1/18 | 500,000 | 548,750 | |||
Penske Automotive Group Inc. (A), 5.75%, 10/1/22 | 500,000 | 515,000 | |||
Sally Holdings LLC / Sally Capital Inc., 5.75%, 6/1/22 | 1,000,000 | 1,085,000 | |||
Yankee Candle Co. Inc., Series B, 8.5%, 2/15/15 | 23,000 | 23,115 | |||
2,782,365 | |||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods - 2.0% | |||||
Hanesbrands Inc., 6.375%, 12/15/20 | 250,000 | 275,000 | |||
Levi Strauss & Co., 7.625%, 5/15/20 | 500,000 | 545,000 | |||
PVH Corp., 4.5%, 12/15/22 | 500,000 | 505,000 | |||
1,325,000 | |||||
Consumer Staples - 5.9% | |||||
Central Garden and Pet Co., 8.25%, 3/1/18 | 500,000 | 528,750 | |||
Dole Food Co. Inc. (A), 8%, 10/1/16 | 200,000 | 208,000 | |||
Ingles Markets Inc., 8.875%, 5/15/17 | 750,000 | 799,688 | |||
Mead Products LLC / ACCO Brands Corp. (A), 6.75%, 4/30/20 | 250,000 | 262,500 | |||
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC / Pinnacle Foods Finance Corp., 9.25%, 4/1/15 | 378,000 | 383,670 | |||
Pinnacle Foods Finance LLC / Pinnacle Foods Finance Corp., 8.25%, 9/1/17 | 500,000 | 532,500 | |||
Stater Brothers Holdings, 7.75%, 4/15/15 | 500,000 | 510,000 | |||
Tops Markets LLC, 10.125%, 10/15/15 | 500,000 | 527,500 | |||
US Foodservice (A), 8.5%, 6/30/19 | 200,000 | 204,000 | |||
3,956,608 |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
High Income Fund Portfolio of Investments
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
CORPORATE NOTES AND BONDS (continued) | |||||
Energy - 14.2% | |||||
Access Midstream Partners L.P. / ACMP Finance Corp., 4.875%, 5/15/23 | $ | 500,000 | $ | 507,500 | |
AmeriGas Finance LLC / AmeriGas Finance Corp., 7%, 5/20/22 | 250,000 | 278,125 | |||
AmeriGas Partners L.P. / AmeriGas Finance Corp., 6.25%, 8/20/19 | 500,000 | 535,000 | |||
Chaparral Energy Inc., 8.25%, 9/1/21 | 500,000 | 542,500 | |||
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 6.775%, 3/15/19 | 750,000 | 750,937 | |||
Cie Generale de Geophysique – Veritas (B), 6.5%, 6/1/21 | 300,000 | 321,000 | |||
Continental Resources Inc., 8.25%, 10/1/19 | 250,000 | 280,000 | |||
Copano Energy LLC / Copano Energy Finance Corp., 7.125%, 4/1/21 | 550,000 | 590,562 | |||
Exterran Holdings Inc., 7.25%, 12/1/18 | 500,000 | 530,000 | |||
Helix Energy Solutions Group Inc. (A), 9.5%, 1/15/16 | 87,000 | 89,175 | |||
Key Energy Services Inc., 6.75%, 3/1/21 | 500,000 | 500,000 | |||
MarkWest Energy Partners L.P. / MarkWest Energy Finance Corp., 6.75%, 11/1/20 | 500,000 | 545,000 | |||
Oasis Petroleum Inc., 6.875%, 1/15/23 | 500,000 | 536,250 | |||
PetroBakken Energy Ltd. (A) (B), 8.625%, 2/1/20 | 700,000 | 710,500 | |||
Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.5%, 11/15/20 | 500,000 | 553,750 | |||
Precision Drilling Corp. (B), 6.5%, 12/15/21 | 850,000 | 905,250 | |||
QEP Resources Inc., 5.25%, 5/1/23 | 500,000 | 535,000 | |||
Regency Energy Partners L.P. / Regency Energy Finance Corp., 6.875%, 12/1/18 | 500,000 | 545,000 | |||
Unit Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/21 | 250,000 | 256,563 | |||
9,512,112 | |||||
Financials - 3.4% | |||||
Ally Financial Inc., 5.5%, 2/15/17 | 700,000 | 748,834 | |||
CIT Group Inc., 5%, 5/15/17 | 50,000 | 53,000 | |||
MPT Operating Partnership L.P. / MPT Finance Corp., 6.875%, 5/1/21 | 500,000 | 542,500 | |||
Nuveen Investments Inc. (A), 9.125%, 10/15/17 | 400,000 | 393,000 | |||
Toys R Us Property Co. I LLC, 10.75%, 7/15/17 | 500,000 | 538,750 | |||
2,276,084 | |||||
Health Care - 8.8% | |||||
Air Medical Group Holdings Inc., 9.25%, 11/1/18 | 500,000 | 552,500 | |||
Biomet Inc. (A), 6.5%, 8/1/20 | 250,000 | 265,625 | |||
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc., 6.375%, 11/1/18 | 500,000 | 536,250 | |||
Endo Health Solutions Inc., 7%, 12/15/20 | 500,000 | 533,125 | |||
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Fresenius Medical Care US Finance II Inc. (A), 5.625%, 7/31/19 | $ | 200,000 | $ | 214,750 | |
Fresenius Medical Care US Finance II Inc. (A), 5.875%, 1/31/22 | 200,000 | 217,000 | |||
HCA Inc., 5.875%, 3/15/22 | 250,000 | 271,875 | |||
HCA Inc., 5.875%, 5/1/23 | 800,000 | 828,000 | |||
Multiplan Inc. (A), 9.875%, 9/1/18 | 250,000 | 278,750 | |||
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 6.25%, 11/1/18 | 250,000 | 274,375 | |||
Tenet Healthcare Corp., 8%, 8/1/20 | 850,000 | 915,344 | |||
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International (A), 6.875%, 12/1/18 | 500,000 | 538,750 | |||
Vanguard Health Holding Co. II LLC / Vanguard Holding Co. II Inc. (A), 7.75%, 2/1/19 | 500,000 | 517,500 | |||
5,943,844 | |||||
Industrials - 6.8% | |||||
Alliance Data Systems Corp. (A), 5.25%, 12/1/17 | 50,000 | 50,750 | |||
Alliance Data Systems Corp. (A), 6.375%, 4/1/20 | 400,000 | 426,000 | |||
Ashtead Capital Inc. (A), 6.5%, 7/15/22 | 500,000 | 542,500 | |||
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC / Avis Budget Finance Inc., 8.25%, 1/15/19 | 500,000 | 552,500 | |||
Belden Inc. (A), 5.5%, 9/1/22 | 500,000 | 513,750 | |||
Moog Inc., 7.25%, 6/15/18 | 500,000 | 525,625 | |||
RBS Global Inc. / Rexnord LLC, 8.5%, 5/1/18 | 300,000 | 325,125 | |||
Tomkins LLC / Tomkins Inc., 9%, 10/1/18 | 325,000 | 364,000 | |||
TransDigm Inc. (A), 5.5%, 10/15/20 | 200,000 | 208,000 | |||
United Rentals North America Inc., 8.25%, 2/1/21 | 175,000 | 197,312 | |||
United Rentals North America Inc. (A), 7.625%, 4/15/22 | 500,000 | 558,750 | |||
West Corp., 8.625%, 10/1/18 | 100,000 | 104,750 | |||
West Corp., 7.875%, 1/15/19 | 200,000 | 207,000 | |||
4,576,062 | |||||
Information Technology - 3.3% | |||||
Level 3 Financing Inc., 8.125%, 7/1/19 | 400,000 | 436,000 | |||
SunGard Data Systems Inc., 7.375%, 11/15/18 | 800,000 | 857,000 | |||
Syniverse Holdings Inc., 9.125%, 1/15/19 | 850,000 | 907,375 | |||
2,200,375 | |||||
Materials - 8.8% | |||||
ArcelorMittal (B), 5.75%, 8/5/20 | 500,000 | 501,005 | |||
Ardagh Packaging Finance PLC / Ardagh MP Holdings USA Inc. (A) (B), 9.125%, 10/15/20 | 300,000 | 325,500 | |||
Boise Cascade LLC / Boise Cascade Finance Corp. (A), 6.375%, 11/1/20 | 600,000 | 618,000 | |||
FMG Resources August 2006 Pty Ltd. (A) (B), 7%, 11/1/15 | 200,000 | 210,000 |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
High Income Fund Portfolio of Investments
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
CORPORATE NOTES AND BONDS (continued) | |||||
Materials (continued) | |||||
Graphic Packaging International Inc., 9.5%, 6/15/17 | $ | 350,000 | $ | 378,000 | |
Huntsman International LLC, 5.5%, 6/30/16 | 250,000 | 250,313 | |||
Huntsman International LLC (A), 4.875%, 11/15/20 | 250,000 | 252,812 | |||
JMC Steel Group (A), 8.25%, 3/15/18 | 1,000,000 | 1,045,000 | |||
Penn Virginia Resource Partners L.P. / Penn Virginia Resource Finance Corp., 8.25%, 4/15/18 | 700,000 | 742,000 | |||
Polymer Group Inc., 7.75%, 2/1/19 | 500,000 | 536,250 | |||
Reynolds Group Issuer Inc. / Reynolds Group Issuer LLC, 8.5%, 5/15/18 | 250,000 | 256,250 | |||
Reynolds Group Issuer Inc. / Reynolds Group Issuer LLC, 9%, 4/15/19 | 250,000 | 260,000 | |||
Reynolds Group Issuer Inc. / Reynolds Group Issuer LLC, 8.25%, 2/15/21 | 500,000 | 507,500 | |||
5,882,630 | |||||
Telecommunication Services - 5.6% | |||||
CenturyLink Inc., 5.8%, 3/15/22 | 500,000 | 528,563 | |||
CommScope Inc. (A), 8.25%, 1/15/19 | 500,000 | 547,500 | |||
Crown Castle International Corp., 7.125%, 11/1/19 | 150,000 | 165,750 | |||
Crown Castle International Corp. (A), 5.25%, 1/15/23 | 600,000 | 642,000 | |||
SBA Telecommunications Inc. (A), 5.75%, 7/15/20 | 300,000 | 318,750 | |||
Sprint Nextel Corp., 7%, 8/15/20 | 325,000 | 355,063 | |||
Sprint Nextel Corp., 6%, 11/15/22 | 200,000 | 205,500 | |||
tw telecom holdings, Inc., 8%, 3/1/18 | 500,000 | 547,500 | |||
Windstream Corp., 7%, 3/15/19 | 475,000 | 485,688 | |||
3,796,314 | |||||
Utilities - 2.3% | |||||
GenOn Energy Inc., 7.875%, 6/15/17 | 300,000 | 331,500 | |||
Mirant Americas Generation LLC, 8.5%, 10/1/21 | 300,000 | 342,000 | |||
NRG Energy Inc., 8.25%, 9/1/20 | 475,000 | 532,000 | |||
Suburban Propane Partners L.P. / Suburban Energy Finance Corp., 7.375%, 8/1/21 | 309,000 | 336,038 | |||
1,541,538 | |||||
Total Corporate Notes and Bonds (Cost $59,983,869) | 63,087,653 | ||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 4.7% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 3,135,148 | $ | 3,135,148 | ||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $3,135,148) | 3,135,148 | ||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 98.7% (Cost $63,119,017**) | 66,222,801 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 1.3% | 876,800 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 67,099,601 | |||
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $63,119,017. |
(A) | Security sold within terms of a private placement memorandum exempt from registration under section 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may be sold only to dealers in that program or other “qualified institutional investors.” |
(B) | Notes and bonds, issued by foreign entities, denominated in U.S. dollars. The aggregate of these securities is 9.39% of total net assets. |
PIK | Payment in Kind Security. Pays interest in additional bonds rather than in cash. |
PLC | Public Limited Company. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Diversified Income Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
COMMON STOCKS - 54.8% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary - 5.4% | |||||
McDonald’s Corp. | 52,500 | $ | 4,631,025 | ||
Omnicom Group Inc. | 71,500 | 3,572,140 | |||
Target Corp. | 69,000 | 4,082,730 | |||
Time Warner Inc. | 130,000 | 6,217,900 | |||
Viacom Inc., Class B | 55,500 | 2,927,070 | |||
21,430,865 | |||||
Consumer Staples - 7.7% | |||||
Coca-Cola Co./The | 93,000 | 3,371,250 | |||
Diageo PLC, ADR | 27,000 | 3,147,660 | |||
Nestle S.A., ADR | 59,000 | 3,845,030 | |||
PepsiCo Inc. | 107,300 | 7,342,539 | |||
Philip Morris International Inc. | 31,000 | 2,592,840 | |||
Procter & Gamble Co./The | 74,000 | 5,023,860 | |||
Sysco Corp. | 82,000 | 2,596,120 | |||
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. | 35,000 | 2,388,050 | |||
30,307,349 | |||||
Energy - 6.3% | |||||
Chevron Corp. | 91,500 | 9,894,810 | |||
ConocoPhillips | 145,000 | 8,408,550 | |||
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 38,000 | 3,288,900 | |||
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 43,000 | 3,294,230 | |||
24,886,490 | |||||
Financials - 10.5% | |||||
Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. | 100,500 | 3,481,320 | |||
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 109,100 | 2,803,870 | |||
BlackRock Inc. | 26,700 | 5,519,157 | |||
M&T Bank Corp. | 36,000 | 3,544,920 | |||
Northern Trust Corp. | 58,500 | 2,934,360 | |||
PartnerRe Ltd. | 50,500 | 4,064,745 | |||
Travelers Cos. Inc./The | 126,000 | 9,049,320 | |||
US Bancorp | 134,000 | 4,279,960 | |||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 167,000 | 5,708,060 | |||
41,385,712 | |||||
Health Care - 10.1% | |||||
Becton, Dickinson and Co. | 34,000 | 2,658,460 | |||
Johnson & Johnson | 145,000 | 10,164,500 | |||
Medtronic Inc. | 95,800 | 3,929,716 | |||
Merck & Co. Inc. | 206,000 | 8,433,640 | |||
Novartis AG, ADR | 63,000 | 3,987,900 | |||
Pfizer Inc. | 430,019 | 10,784,876 | |||
39,959,092 | |||||
Industrials - 7.3% | |||||
3M Co. | 78,500 | 7,288,725 | |||
Boeing Co./The | 60,000 | 4,521,600 | |||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Emerson Electric Co. | 69,000 | $ | 3,654,240 | ||
United Parcel Service Inc., Class B | 64,000 | 4,718,720 | |||
United Technologies Corp. | 74,000 | 6,068,740 | |||
Waste Management Inc. | 72,000 | 2,429,280 | |||
28,681,305 | |||||
Information Technology - 5.3% | |||||
Accenture PLC, Class A | 42,600 | 2,832,900 | |||
Automatic Data Processing Inc. | 60,500 | 3,449,105 | |||
Intel Corp. | 113,000 | 2,331,190 | |||
Linear Technology Corp. | 90,000 | 3,087,000 | |||
Microchip Technology Inc. | 75,000 | 2,444,250 | |||
Microsoft Corp. | 247,000 | 6,602,310 | |||
20,746,755 | |||||
Materials - 0.9% | |||||
Air Products & Chemicals Inc. | 41,000 | 3,444,820 | |||
Telecommunication Service - 1.3% | |||||
AT&T Inc. | 155,515 | 5,242,411 | |||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $174,701,827) | 216,084,799 | ||||
Par Value | |||||
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES - 0.2% | |||||
ABSC Long Beach Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2000-LB1, Class AF5 (A), 8.55%, 9/21/30 | $ | 599,648 | 607,382 | ||
Total Asset Backed Securities (Cost $618,567) | 607,382 | ||||
CORPORATE NOTES AND BONDS - 16.0% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary - 1.9% | |||||
American Association of Retired Persons (B) (C), 7.5%, 5/1/31 | 2,000,000 | 2,773,042 | |||
DR Horton Inc., 5.25%, 2/15/15 | 515,000 | 542,037 | |||
ERAC USA Finance LLC (B) (C), 6.7%, 6/1/34 | 1,850,000 | 2,239,960 | |||
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (D), 7.25%, 6/15/16 | 1,600,000 | 1,808,000 | |||
7,363,039 | |||||
Consumer Staples - 1.2% | |||||
Kraft Foods Inc., 6.5%, 11/1/31 | 2,025,000 | 2,609,992 | |||
PepsiCo Inc., 4.65%, 2/15/13 | 620,000 | 623,392 | |||
WM Wrigley Jr. Co. (B) (C), 3.05%, 6/28/13 | 1,310,000 | 1,325,548 | |||
4,558,932 | |||||
Energy - 1.4% | |||||
ConocoPhillips, 6.65%, 7/15/18 | 1,500,000 | 1,902,687 | |||
Hess Corp., 7.875%, 10/1/29 | 1,150,000 | 1,598,953 | |||
Transocean Inc. (D), 6%, 3/15/18 | 750,000 | 869,842 | |||
Transocean Inc. (D), 7.5%, 4/15/31 | 1,030,000 | 1,280,051 | |||
5,651,533 |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Diversified Income Fund Portfolio of Investments
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
CORPORATE NOTES AND BONDS (continued) | |||||
Financials - 1.6% | |||||
American Express Credit Corp., 2.375%, 3/24/17 | $ | 450,000 | $ | 470,843 | |
HCP Inc., 6.7%, 1/30/18 | 1,450,000 | 1,748,828 | |||
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (E) *, 5.75%, 1/3/17 | 1,735,000 | 173 | |||
Simon Property Group L.P., 5.875%, 3/1/17 | 530,000 | 627,517 | |||
Swiss Re Solutions Holding Corp., 7%, 2/15/26 | 1,000,000 | 1,271,253 | |||
US Bank NA, 6.3%, 2/4/14 | 2,000,000 | 2,120,934 | |||
6,239,548 | |||||
Health Care - 3.3% | |||||
AbbVie Inc. (B) (C), 2%, 11/6/18 | 1,200,000 | 1,215,510 | |||
Amgen Inc., 5.85%, 6/1/17 | 3,950,000 | 4,677,728 | |||
Eli Lilly & Co., 6.57%, 1/1/16 | 1,200,000 | 1,380,702 | |||
Genentech Inc., 5.25%, 7/15/35 | 740,000 | 892,114 | |||
Merck & Co. Inc., 5.75%, 11/15/36 | 1,320,000 | 1,745,403 | |||
Quest Diagnostics Inc., 5.45%, 11/1/15 | 1,500,000 | 1,665,570 | |||
Wyeth LLC, 6.5%, 2/1/34 | 1,100,000 | 1,503,738 | |||
13,080,765 | |||||
Industrials - 2.1% | |||||
Boeing Co./The, 8.625%, 11/15/31 | 350,000 | 543,393 | |||
Boeing Co./The, 6.875%, 10/15/43 | 620,000 | 874,123 | |||
Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC, 8.125%, 4/15/20 | 1,365,000 | 1,811,545 | |||
EI du Pont de Nemours & Co., 5%, 1/15/13 | 103,000 | 103,161 | |||
Lockheed Martin Corp., 7.65%, 5/1/16 | 780,000 | 944,590 | |||
Norfolk Southern Corp., 5.59%, 5/17/25 | 957,000 | 1,175,250 | |||
Norfolk Southern Corp., 7.05%, 5/1/37 | 1,050,000 | 1,492,189 | |||
Waste Management Inc., 7.125%, 12/15/17 | 1,150,000 | 1,398,207 | |||
8,342,458 | |||||
Information Technology - 0.7% | |||||
Cisco Systems Inc., 5.5%, 2/22/16 | 960,000 | 1,097,333 | |||
International Business Machines Corp., 1.875%, 8/1/22 | 1,600,000 | 1,539,689 | |||
2,637,022 | |||||
Materials - 0.3% | |||||
Westvaco Corp., 8.2%, 1/15/30 | 1,025,000 | 1,352,419 | |||
Telecommunication Services - 1.0% | |||||
Comcast Cable Communications Holdings Inc., 9.455%, 11/15/22 | 1,780,000 | 2,691,109 | |||
Rogers Communications Inc. (D), 6.25%, 6/15/13 | 1,315,000 | 1,348,880 | |||
4,039,989 | |||||
Utilities - 2.5% | |||||
Indianapolis Power & Light Co. (B) (C), 6.05%, 10/1/36 | 1,555,000 | 1,885,196 | |||
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Interstate Power & Light Co., 6.25%, 7/15/39 | $ | 1,365,000 | $ | 1,790,573 | |
Nevada Power Co., Series R, 6.75%, 7/1/37 | 1,600,000 | 2,219,242 | |||
Sierra Pacific Power Co., Series M, 6%, 5/15/16 | 474,000 | 548,571 | |||
Southwestern Electric Power Co., Series E, 5.55%, 1/15/17 | 835,000 | 941,839 | |||
Westar Energy Inc., 6%, 7/1/14 | 2,400,000 | 2,570,081 | |||
9,955,502 | |||||
Total Corporate Notes and Bonds (Cost $55,906,823) | 63,221,207 | ||||
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES - 6.9% | |||||
Fannie Mae - 6.0% | |||||
4%, 4/1/15 Pool # 255719 | 178,216 | 190,890 | |||
5.5%, 4/1/16 Pool # 745444 | 263,817 | 283,535 | |||
6%, 5/1/16 Pool # 582558 | 67,211 | 71,430 | |||
5%, 12/1/17 Pool # 672243 | 604,719 | 657,173 | |||
4.5%, 9/1/20 Pool # 835465 | 573,640 | 618,020 | |||
6%, 5/1/21 Pool # 253847 | 117,014 | 128,583 | |||
7%, 12/1/29 Pool # 762813 | 50,060 | 58,340 | |||
7%, 11/1/31 Pool # 607515 | 75,522 | 90,233 | |||
7%, 4/1/32 Pool # 641518 | 2,611 | 3,117 | |||
7%, 5/1/32 Pool # 644591 | 53,943 | 64,451 | |||
5.5%, 10/1/33 Pool # 254904 | 558,585 | 613,901 | |||
5.5%, 11/1/33 Pool # 555880 | 1,666,965 | 1,832,043 | |||
5%, 5/1/34 Pool # 780890 | 2,093,567 | 2,275,704 | |||
7%, 7/1/34 Pool # 792636 | 20,221 | 23,172 | |||
5.5%, 8/1/34 Pool # 793647 | 251,127 | 282,666 | |||
5.5%, 3/1/35 Pool # 815976 | 1,255,573 | 1,374,157 | |||
5.5%, 7/1/35 Pool # 825283 | 545,799 | 597,529 | |||
5.5%, 8/1/35 Pool # 826872 | 348,358 | 380,932 | |||
5%, 9/1/35 Pool # 820347 | 666,810 | 755,245 | |||
5%, 9/1/35 Pool # 835699 | 660,147 | 747,697 | |||
5%, 10/1/35 Pool # 797669 | 687,918 | 774,852 | |||
5.5%, 10/1/35 Pool # 836912 | 280,799 | 306,926 | |||
5%, 12/1/35 Pool # 850561 | 442,694 | 480,654 | |||
5.5%, 12/1/35 Pool # 844583 | 1,365,921 | 1,492,792 | |||
5.5%, 2/1/36 Pool # 851330 | 110,434 | 120,856 | |||
5.5%, 9/1/36 Pool # 831820 | 1,437,280 | 1,647,435 | |||
6%, 9/1/36 Pool # 831741 | 634,439 | 693,909 | |||
5.5%, 10/1/36 Pool # 896340 | 151,359 | 165,038 | |||
5.5%, 10/1/36 Pool # 901723 | 695,635 | 756,697 | |||
5.5%, 12/1/36 Pool # 902853 | 1,268,169 | 1,402,870 | |||
5.5%, 12/1/36 Pool # 903059 | 1,050,415 | 1,188,575 | |||
5.5%, 12/1/36 Pool # 907512 | 690,238 | 753,200 | |||
5.5%, 12/1/36 Pool # 907635 | 910,503 | 1,034,813 | |||
3.5%, 6/1/42 Pool # AO4136 | 1,423,436 | 1,521,912 | |||
23,389,347 |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Diversified Income Fund Portfolio of Investments
Par Value | Value (Note 2) | ||||
MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES (continued) | |||||
Freddie Mac - 0.9% | |||||
8%, 6/1/30 Pool # C01005 | $ | 42,955 | $ | 53,141 | |
6.5%, 1/1/32 Pool # C62333 | 140,476 | 162,956 | |||
5%, 7/1/33 Pool # A11325 | 1,226,603 | 1,368,197 | |||
6%, 10/1/34 Pool # A28439 | 127,853 | 140,654 | |||
6%, 10/1/34 Pool # A28598 | 87,177 | 95,905 | |||
5%, 4/1/35 Pool # A32314 | 190,183 | 212,969 | |||
5%, 4/1/35 Pool # A32315 | 248,382 | 273,484 | |||
5%, 4/1/35 Pool # A32316 | 264,317 | 297,637 | |||
5%, 4/1/35 Pool # A32509 | 131,600 | 144,900 | |||
5%, 1/1/37 Pool # A56371 | 773,757 | 833,335 | |||
3,583,178 | |||||
Ginnie Mae - 0.0% | |||||
6.5%, 4/20/31 Pool # 3068 | 81,723 | 93,957 | |||
Total Mortgage Backed Securities (Cost $24,529,551) | 27,066,482 | ||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AND AGENCY OBLIGATIONS - 18.2% | |||||
U.S. Treasury Bond - 1.3% | |||||
6.625%, 2/15/27 | 3,270,000 | 5,030,179 | |||
U.S. Treasury Notes - 16.9% | |||||
1.375%, 1/15/13 | 4,000,000 | 4,001,720 | |||
3.625%, 5/15/13 | 1,980,000 | 2,005,524 | |||
3.125%, 8/31/13 | 1,175,000 | 1,197,857 | |||
4.000%, 2/15/14 | 4,810,000 | 5,013,862 | |||
4.250%, 8/15/14 | 4,965,000 | 5,286,563 | |||
2.375%, 9/30/14 | 1,400,000 | 1,451,953 | |||
0.500%, 10/15/14 | 5,000,000 | 5,022,655 | |||
2.500%, 3/31/15 | 795,000 | 834,502 | |||
4.500%, 2/15/16 | 3,550,000 | 4,001,237 | |||
3.250%, 12/31/16 | 2,500,000 | 2,768,750 | |||
3.125%, 1/31/17 | 2,000,000 | 2,207,968 | |||
0.500%, 7/31/17 | 4,000,000 | 3,975,936 | |||
2.375%, 7/31/17 | 2,000,000 | 2,156,718 | |||
4.250%, 11/15/17 | 12,100,000 | 14,168,350 | |||
2.750%, 2/15/19 | 1,300,000 | 1,439,446 | |||
3.375%, 11/15/19 | 1,000,000 | 1,149,766 | |||
2.625%, 11/15/20 | 7,400,000 | 8,121,500 | |||
1.750%, 5/15/22 | 1,750,000 | 1,765,176 | |||
66,569,483 | |||||
Total U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (Cost $67,276,218) | 71,599,662 | ||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 3.6% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 14,006,365 | $ | 14,006,365 | ||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $14,006,365) | 14,006,365 | ||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.7% (Cost $337,039,351**) | 392,585,897 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.3% | 1,344,592 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 393,930,489 | |||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $337,889,040. |
(A) | Stepped rate security. Rate shown is as of December 31, 2012. |
(B) | Security sold within terms of a private placement memorandum exempt from registration under section 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and may be sold only to dealers in that program or other “qualified institutional investors.” |
(C) | Illiquid security (See Note 2). |
(D) | Notes and bonds, issued by foreign entities, denominated in U.S. dollars. The aggregate of these securities is 1.35% of total net assets. |
(E) | In default. Issuer is bankrupt. |
ADR | American Depositary Receipt. |
PLC | Public Limited Company. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Large Cap Value Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | |||||
COMMON STOCKS - 96.2% | ||||||
Consumer Discretionary - 8.5% | ||||||
McDonald’s Corp. | 58,000 | $ | 5,116,180 | |||
Omnicom Group Inc. | 174,000 | 8,693,040 | ||||
Target Corp. | 160,000 | 9,467,200 | ||||
Time Warner Inc. | 236,500 | 11,311,795 | ||||
Viacom Inc., Class B | 151,000 | 7,963,740 | ||||
42,551,955 | ||||||
Consumer Staples - 10.1% | ||||||
Diageo PLC, ADR | 42,500 | 4,954,650 | ||||
Nestle S.A., ADR | 94,000 | 6,125,980 | ||||
PepsiCo Inc. | 151,000 | 10,332,930 | ||||
Philip Morris International Inc. | 67,000 | 5,603,880 | ||||
Procter & Gamble Co./The | 177,000 | 12,016,530 | ||||
Sysco Corp. | 184,000 | 5,825,440 | ||||
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. | 82,000 | 5,594,860 | ||||
50,454,270 | ||||||
Energy - 13.5% | ||||||
Apache Corp. | 123,500 | 9,694,750 | ||||
Chevron Corp. | 143,046 | 15,468,994 | ||||
ConocoPhillips | 198,000 | 11,482,020 | ||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 59,000 | 5,106,450 | ||||
National Oilwell Varco Inc. | 37,000 | 2,528,950 | ||||
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 158,500 | 12,142,685 | ||||
Schlumberger Ltd. | 161,000 | 11,155,690 | ||||
67,579,539 | ||||||
Financials - 26.2% | ||||||
Capital Markets - 4.7% | ||||||
Bank of New York Mellon Corp./The | 480,000 | 12,336,000 | ||||
BlackRock Inc. | 31,000 | 6,408,010 | ||||
Franklin Resources Inc. | 40,000 | 5,028,000 | ||||
23,772,010 | ||||||
Commercial Banks - 6.7% | ||||||
M&T Bank Corp. | 55,000 | 5,415,850 | ||||
US Bancorp | 405,000 | 12,935,700 | ||||
Wells Fargo & Co. | 450,000 | 15,381,000 | ||||
33,732,550 | ||||||
Insurance - 13.0% | ||||||
American International Group Inc. * | 157,000 | 5,542,100 | ||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd. * | 202,500 | 8,914,050 | ||||
Berkshire Hathaway Inc., Class B * | 162,000 | 14,531,400 | ||||
Markel Corp. * | 32,576 | 14,119,090 | ||||
Travelers Cos. Inc./The | 217,500 | 15,620,850 | ||||
WR Berkley Corp. | 165,032 | 6,228,308 | ||||
64,955,798 | ||||||
Real Estate Management & Development - 1.8% | ||||||
Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Class A | 240,000 | 8,796,000 | ||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | |||||
Health Care - 16.7% | ||||||
Johnson & Johnson | 309,000 | $ | 21,660,900 | |||
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings * | 70,000 | 6,063,400 | ||||
Medtronic Inc. | 233,000 | 9,557,660 | ||||
Merck & Co. Inc. | 461,500 | 18,893,810 | ||||
Novartis AG, ADR | 119,000 | 7,532,700 | ||||
Pfizer Inc. | 796,000 | 19,963,680 | ||||
83,672,150 | ||||||
Industrials - 12.4% | ||||||
3M Co. | 179,000 | 16,620,150 | ||||
Boeing Co./The | 123,500 | 9,306,960 | ||||
Danaher Corp. | 94,000 | 5,254,600 | ||||
Emerson Electric Co. | 160,000 | 8,473,600 | ||||
General Dynamics Corp. | 78,000 | 5,403,060 | ||||
United Parcel Service Inc., Class B | 122,000 | 8,995,060 | ||||
United Technologies Corp. | 100,000 | 8,201,000 | ||||
62,254,430 | ||||||
Information Technology - 3.9% | ||||||
Intel Corp. | 245,000 | 5,054,350 | ||||
International Business Machines Corp. | 35,500 | 6,800,025 | ||||
Microsoft Corp. | 282,000 | 7,537,860 | ||||
19,392,235 | ||||||
Materials - 3.4% | ||||||
Air Products & Chemicals Inc. | 86,000 | 7,225,720 | ||||
Mosaic Co./The | 46,000 | 2,604,980 | ||||
Newmont Mining Corp. | 149,000 | 6,919,560 | ||||
16,750,260 | ||||||
Telecommunication Service - 1.4% | ||||||
AT&T Inc. | 212,987 | 7,179,792 | ||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $399,218,418) | 481,090,989 | |||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 4.0% | ||||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 20,226,182 | 20,226,182 | ||||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $20,226,182) | 20,226,182 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 100.2% (Cost $419,444,600**) | 501,317,171 | |||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - (0.2%) | (848,044 | ) | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 500,469,127 | ||||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $419,832,130. |
ADR | American Depositary Receipt. |
PLC | Public Limited Company. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Large Cap Growth Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
COMMON STOCKS - 95.4% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary - 16.7% | |||||
Amazon.com Inc. * | 22,097 | $ | 5,549,441 | ||
CarMax Inc. * | 57,568 | 2,161,103 | |||
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. * | 5,165 | 1,536,381 | |||
Comcast Corp., Class A | 134,817 | 5,039,459 | |||
Discovery Communications Inc., Class C * | 64,335 | 3,763,597 | |||
Home Depot Inc./The | 77,125 | 4,770,181 | |||
J.C. Penney Company Inc. | 90,852 | 1,790,693 | |||
Lululemon Athletica Inc. * | 24,685 | 1,881,738 | |||
Nielsen Holdings N.V. * | 76,523 | 2,340,839 | |||
NIKE Inc. | 56,918 | 2,936,969 | |||
Omnicom Group Inc. | 79,720 | 3,982,811 | |||
Panera Bread Co., Class A * | 28,003 | 4,447,716 | |||
priceline.com Inc. * | 6,943 | 4,312,992 | |||
Starbucks Corp. | 56,378 | 3,022,988 | |||
Tractor Supply Co. | 18,405 | 1,626,266 | |||
Walt Disney Co./The | 67,630 | 3,367,298 | |||
Yum! Brands Inc. | 78,870 | 5,236,968 | |||
57,767,440 | |||||
Consumer Staples - 7.7% | |||||
Coca-Cola Co./The | 236,890 | 8,587,262 | |||
Costco Wholesale Corp. | 57,304 | 5,659,916 | |||
Diageo PLC, ADR | 29,717 | 3,464,408 | |||
Hershey Co./The | 31,875 | 2,302,013 | |||
PepsiCo Inc. | 99,563 | 6,813,096 | |||
26,826,695 | |||||
Energy - 4.8% | |||||
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 80,810 | 6,994,105 | |||
Schlumberger Ltd. | 138,765 | 9,615,027 | |||
16,609,132 | |||||
Financials - 4.8% | |||||
Aon PLC | 15,505 | 862,078 | |||
Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Class A | 97,582 | 3,576,380 | |||
IntercontinentalExchange Inc. * | 55,442 | 6,864,274 | |||
T Rowe Price Group Inc. | 84,254 | 5,487,463 | |||
16,790,195 | |||||
Health Care - 10.5% | |||||
Allergan Inc. | 38,628 | 3,543,347 | |||
Becton, Dickinson and Co. | 31,965 | 2,499,343 | |||
Biogen Idec Inc. * | 26,105 | 3,828,820 | |||
Celgene Corp. * | 67,595 | 5,321,078 | |||
Cerner Corp. * | 74,564 | 5,789,149 | |||
Eli Lilly & Co. | 36,430 | 1,796,728 | |||
Johnson & Johnson | 82,125 | 5,756,963 | |||
UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 147,345 | 7,991,993 | |||
36,527,421 | |||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Industrials - 11.9% | |||||
3M Co. | 50,963 | $ | 4,731,915 | ||
Boeing Co./The | 77,597 | 5,847,710 | |||
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. | 43,470 | 2,748,173 | |||
Copart Inc. * | 72,802 | 2,147,659 | |||
Danaher Corp. | 82,145 | 4,591,905 | |||
Emerson Electric Co. | 87,988 | 4,659,844 | |||
Expeditors International of Washington Inc. | 49,867 | 1,972,240 | |||
IHS Inc., Class A * | 25,953 | 2,491,488 | |||
Roper Industries Inc. | 37,893 | 4,224,312 | |||
United Parcel Service Inc., Class B | 74,075 | 5,461,550 | |||
W.W. Grainger Inc. | 11,825 | 2,393,025 | |||
41,269,821 | |||||
Information Technology - 33.1% | |||||
Communications Equipment - 2.8% | |||||
QUALCOMM Inc. | 154,710 | 9,595,114 | |||
Computers & Peripherals - 8.6% | |||||
Apple Inc. | 50,848 | 27,103,509 | |||
EMC Corp. * | 109,275 | 2,764,658 | |||
29,868,167 | |||||
Electrical Equipment - 0.6% | |||||
Sensata Technologies Holding N.V. * | 63,077 | 2,048,741 | |||
Internet Software & Services - 5.9% | |||||
Baidu Inc., ADR * | 14,180 | 1,422,112 | |||
eBay Inc. * | 79,935 | 4,078,284 | |||
Google Inc., Class A * | 21,348 | 15,143,631 | |||
20,644,027 | |||||
IT Services - 3.9% | |||||
Accenture PLC, Class A | 114,662 | 7,625,023 | |||
Visa Inc., Class A | 38,321 | 5,808,697 | |||
13,433,720 | |||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment - 2.3% | |||||
ASML Holding N.V. | 48,040 | 3,094,256 | |||
Intel Corp. | 234,915 | 4,846,297 | |||
7,940,553 | |||||
Software - 9.0% | |||||
MICROS Systems Inc. * | 112,038 | 4,754,893 | |||
Microsoft Corp. | 434,685 | 11,619,130 | |||
Nuance Communications Inc. * | 228,411 | 5,098,133 | |||
Oracle Corp. | 227,391 | 7,576,668 | |||
SAP AG, ADR | 26,550 | 2,134,089 | |||
31,182,913 |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Large Cap Growth Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
COMMON STOCKS (continued) | |||||
Materials - 4.1% | |||||
Ecolab Inc. | 42,352 | $ | 3,045,109 | ||
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | 58,145 | 3,868,968 | |||
Monsanto Co. | 77,130 | 7,300,355 | |||
14,214,432 | |||||
Telecommunication Service - 1.8% | |||||
Verizon Communications Inc. | 142,720 | 6,175,494 | |||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $259,589,772) | 330,893,865 | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 4.3% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 15,071,048 | 15,071,048 | |||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $15,071,048) | 15,071,048 | ||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.7% (Cost $274,660,820**) | 345,964,913 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.3% | 1,160,940 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 347,125,853 | |||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $276,357,865. |
ADR | American Depositary Receipt. |
PLC | Public Limited Company. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Mid Cap Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | |||||
COMMON STOCKS - 93.3% | ||||||
Consumer Discretionary - 21.0% | ||||||
Advance Auto Parts Inc. | 91,899 | $ | 6,648,893 | |||
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. * | 186,786 | 10,443,205 | ||||
CarMax Inc. * | 298,482 | 11,205,014 | ||||
Discovery Communications Inc., Class C * | 126,266 | 7,386,561 | ||||
Liberty Global Inc., Series C * | 164,597 | 9,670,074 | ||||
Omnicom Group Inc. | 227,693 | 11,375,542 | ||||
Tiffany & Co. | 158,225 | 9,072,622 | ||||
TJX Cos. Inc. | 285,782 | 12,131,446 | ||||
77,933,357 | ||||||
Consumer Staples - 3.1% | ||||||
Brown-Forman Corp., Class B | 53,198 | 3,364,773 | ||||
McCormick & Co. Inc. | 128,511 | 8,164,304 | ||||
11,529,077 | ||||||
Energy - 7.3% | ||||||
Ensco PLC, Class A | 125,332 | 7,429,681 | ||||
EOG Resources Inc. | 45,949 | 5,550,180 | ||||
Noble Corp. | 172,962 | 6,022,537 | ||||
World Fuel Services Corp. | 192,203 | 7,912,997 | ||||
26,915,395 | ||||||
Financials - 23.1% | ||||||
Arch Capital Group Ltd. * | 223,394 | 9,833,804 | ||||
Brookfield Asset Management Inc., Class A | 408,688 | 14,978,415 | ||||
Brown & Brown Inc. | 283,468 | 7,217,095 | ||||
Glacier Bancorp Inc. | 369,276 | 5,432,050 | ||||
Leucadia National Corp. | 363,038 | 8,636,674 | ||||
M&T Bank Corp. | 99,109 | 9,759,263 | ||||
Markel Corp. * | 39,038 | 16,919,850 | ||||
WR Berkley Corp. | 337,337 | 12,731,099 | ||||
85,508,250 | ||||||
Health Care - 8.1% | ||||||
DENTSPLY International Inc. | 215,177 | 8,523,161 | ||||
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings * | 136,204 | 11,797,990 | ||||
Techne Corp. | 140,314 | 9,589,059 | ||||
29,910,210 | ||||||
Industrials - 19.6% | ||||||
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc. | 206,960 | 13,084,011 | ||||
Copart Inc. * | 504,136 | 14,872,012 | ||||
Expeditors International of Washington Inc. | 240,205 | 9,500,108 | ||||
IDEX Corp. | 175,615 | 8,171,366 | ||||
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. * | 182,189 | 7,755,786 | ||||
Ritchie Bros Auctioneers Inc. | 412,237 | 8,611,631 | ||||
Wabtec Corp. | 121,973 | 10,677,516 | ||||
72,672,430 | ||||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | |||||
Information Technology - 4.1% | ||||||
Amphenol Corp., Class A | 107,591 | $ | 66,961,138 | |||
MICROS Systems Inc. * | 195,752 | 8,307,715 | ||||
15,268,853 | ||||||
Materials - 7.0% | ||||||
Crown Holdings Inc. * | 241,779 | 8,899,885 | ||||
Ecolab Inc. | 125,183 | 9,000,658 | ||||
Valspar Corp. | 125,518 | 7,832,323 | ||||
25,732,866 | ||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $263,047,742) | 345,470,438 | |||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 7.0% | ||||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 26,049,776 | 26,049,776 | ||||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $26,049,776) | 26,049,776 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 100.3% (Cost $289,097,518**) | 371,520,214 | |||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - (0.3%) | (1,059,207 | ) | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 370,461,007 | ||||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $289,340,679. |
PLC | Public Limited Company. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Small Cap Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
COMMON STOCKS - 97.0% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary - 13.8% | |||||
Arbitron Inc. | 7,040 | $ | 328,627 | ||
Ascena Retail Group Inc. * | 10,720 | 198,213 | |||
Cato Corp./The, Class A | 9,840 | 269,911 | |||
CEC Entertainment Inc. | 6,020 | 199,804 | |||
Choice Hotels International Inc. | 2,020 | 67,912 | |||
Fred’s Inc., Class A | 11,800 | 157,058 | |||
Helen of Troy Ltd. * | 7,110 | 237,403 | |||
Matthews International Corp., Class A | 6,240 | 200,304 | |||
Stage Stores Inc. | 7,910 | 196,010 | |||
1,855,242 | |||||
Consumer Staples - 1.9% | |||||
Casey’s General Stores Inc. | 3,080 | 163,548 | |||
Post Holdings Inc. * | 2,800 | 95,900 | |||
259,448 | |||||
Energy - 3.9% | |||||
Bristow Group Inc. | 2,400 | 128,784 | |||
Halcon Resources Corp. * | 7,341 | 50,800 | |||
Penn Virginia Corp. | 5,070 | 22,358 | |||
Scorpio Tankers Inc. * | 18,200 | 129,402 | |||
SEACOR Holdings Inc. | 2,290 | 191,902 | |||
523,246 | |||||
Financials - 19.6% | |||||
AMERISAFE Inc. * | 5,370 | 146,332 | |||
Ares Capital Corp. | 3,763 | 65,853 | |||
Assured Guaranty Ltd. | 7,700 | 109,571 | |||
Campus Crest Communities Inc., REIT | 11,400 | 139,764 | |||
DiamondRock Hospitality Co., REIT | 12,529 | 112,761 | |||
First Busey Corp. | 21,607 | 100,473 | |||
First Midwest Bancorp Inc. | 16,230 | 203,200 | |||
First Niagara Financial Group Inc. | 15,507 | 122,971 | |||
Flushing Financial Corp. | 7,981 | 122,429 | |||
Hancock Holding Co. | 3,500 | 111,090 | |||
International Bancshares Corp. | 11,150 | 201,257 | |||
Mack-Cali Realty Corp., REIT | 3,600 | 93,996 | |||
MB Financial Inc. | 6,330 | 125,017 | |||
Northwest Bancshares Inc. | 17,180 | 208,565 | |||
Platinum Underwriters Holdings Ltd. | 3,660 | 168,360 | |||
Primerica Inc. | 7,000 | 210,070 | |||
Summit Hotel Properties Inc., REIT | 11,200 | 106,400 | |||
Webster Financial Corp. | 11,080 | 227,694 | |||
Westamerica Bancorporation | 1,170 | 49,830 | |||
2,625,633 | |||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Health Care - 10.8% | |||||
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc. * | 5,400 | $ | 50,868 | ||
Amsurg Corp. * | 7,190 | 215,772 | |||
Charles River Laboratories International Inc. * | 8,300 | 311,001 | |||
Corvel Corp. * | 2,730 | 122,386 | |||
Haemonetics Corp. * | 1,400 | 57,176 | |||
ICON PLC, ADR * | 11,830 | 328,401 | |||
ICU Medical Inc. * | 3,670 | 223,613 | |||
STERIS Corp. | 4,000 | 138,920 | |||
1,448,137 | |||||
Industrials - 27.3% | |||||
Aerospace & Defense - 0.9% | |||||
Cubic Corp. | 2,400 | 115,128 | |||
Air Freight & Logistics - 1.7% | |||||
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc. * | 2,900 | 128,499 | |||
UTi Worldwide Inc. | 7,800 | 104,520 | |||
233,019 | |||||
Commercial Services & Supplies - 6.2% | |||||
ACCO Brands Corp. * | 25,840 | 189,665 | |||
G&K Services Inc., Class A | 5,900 | 201,485 | |||
McGrath RentCorp | 1,000 | 29,020 | |||
Standard Parking Corp. * | 5,490 | 120,725 | |||
United Stationers Inc. | 9,220 | 285,728 | |||
826,623 | |||||
Construction & Engineering - 0.3% | |||||
Sterling Construction Co. Inc. * | 3,390 | 33,697 | |||
Electrical Equipment - 4.1% | |||||
Acuity Brands Inc. | 1,810 | 122,591 | |||
Belden Inc. | 9,430 | 424,256 | |||
546,847 | |||||
Industrial Conglomerates - 3.8% | |||||
Carlisle Cos. Inc. | 8,750 | 514,150 | |||
Machinery - 5.7% | |||||
Albany International Corp., Class A | 10,250 | 232,470 | |||
ESCO Technologies Inc. | 5,790 | 216,604 | |||
Mueller Industries Inc. | 6,300 | 315,189 | |||
764,263 | |||||
Marine - 1.8% | |||||
Kirby Corp. * | 3,930 | 243,228 | |||
Road & Rail - 1.1% | |||||
Genesee & Wyoming Inc., Class A * | 2,000 | 152,160 | |||
Trading Companies & Distributors - 1.7% | |||||
GATX Corp. | 5,370 | 232,521 | |||
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Small Cap Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | |||||
COMMON STOCKS (continued) | ||||||
Information Technology - 7.9% | ||||||
Coherent Inc. | 2,470 | $ | 125,031 | |||
Diebold Inc. | 5,370 | 164,376 | ||||
Forrester Research Inc. | 4,000 | 107,200 | ||||
MAXIMUS Inc. | 3,480 | 220,006 | ||||
MTS Systems Corp. | 3,730 | 189,969 | ||||
Websense Inc. * | 6,500 | 97,760 | ||||
Zebra Technologies Corp., Class A * | 4,000 | 157,120 | ||||
1,061,462 | ||||||
Materials - 7.6% | ||||||
Aptargroup Inc. | 3,720 | 177,518 | ||||
Deltic Timber Corp. | 2,480 | 175,138 | ||||
Greif Inc., Class A | 2,700 | 120,150 | ||||
Innospec Inc. | 4,600 | 158,654 | ||||
Koppers Holdings Inc. | 3,100 | 118,265 | ||||
Sensient Technologies Corp. | 2,800 | 99,568 | ||||
Zep Inc. | 11,740 | 169,526 | ||||
1,018,819 | ||||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | |||||
Utilities - 4.2% | ||||||
Atmos Energy Corp. | 4,250 | $ | 149,260 | |||
New Jersey Resources Corp. | 1,470 | 58,241 | ||||
UNS Energy Corp. | 3,140 | 133,199 | ||||
Westar Energy Inc. | 4,190 | 119,918 | ||||
WGL Holdings Inc. | 2,560 | 100,326 | ||||
560,944 | ||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $9,726,642) | 13,014,567 | |||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 3.7% | ||||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 496,276 | 496,276 | ||||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $496,276) | 496,276 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 100.7% (Cost $10,222,918**) | 13,510,843 | |||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - (0.7%) | (88,445 | ) | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 13,422,398 | ||||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $10,324,427. |
ADR | American Depository Receipt. |
PLC | Public Limited Company. |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
International Stock Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
COMMON STOCKS - 98.4% | |||||
Australia - 2.5% | |||||
James Hardie Industries PLC (A) | 156,266 | $ | 1,511,750 | ||
Orica Ltd. (A) | 32,178 | 846,170 | |||
2,357,920 | |||||
Belgium - 3.5% | |||||
Anheuser-Busch InBev N.V. (A) | 37,741 | 3,298,134 | |||
Brazil - 1.6% | |||||
Anhanguera Educacional Participacoes S.A. (A) | 41,900 | 715,818 | |||
Cielo S.A. (A) | 28,035 | 784,978 | |||
1,500,796 | |||||
Canada - 2.8% | |||||
MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates Ltd. | 2,600 | 146,271 | |||
Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc. | 27,200 | 1,106,923 | |||
Rogers Communications Inc. | 30,700 | 1,393,799 | |||
2,646,993 | |||||
Finland - 1.3% | |||||
Sampo (A) | 37,795 | 1,222,154 | |||
France - 9.8% | |||||
BNP Paribas S.A. (A) | 31,917 | 1,799,070 | |||
Cie Generale de Geophysique - Veritas (A) * | 32,979 | 993,941 | |||
Rexel S.A. (A) | 52,783 | 1,078,551 | |||
Sanofi S.A. (A) | 32,571 | 3,088,878 | |||
Technip S.A. (A) | 10,646 | 1,225,666 | |||
Valeo S.A. (A) | 21,801 | 1,105,450 | |||
9,291,556 | |||||
Germany - 9.8% | |||||
Bayer AG (A) | 22,801 | 2,165,241 | |||
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (A) | 14,718 | 1,419,433 | |||
Merck KGaA (A) | 15,289 | 2,017,199 | |||
RWE AG (A) | 29,001 | 1,197,240 | |||
SAP AG (A) | 21,745 | 1,741,916 | |||
ThyssenKrupp AG (A) | 35,281 | 828,972 | |||
9,370,001 | |||||
Indonesia - 0.8% | |||||
Bank Mandiri Persero Tbk PT, ADR | 93,300 | 782,227 | |||
Ireland - 0.8% | |||||
Ryanair Holdings PLC, ADR | 21,900 | 750,732 | |||
Italy - 2.9% | |||||
Atlantia SpA (A) | 67,122 | 1,217,393 | |||
Eni SpA (A) | 64,298 | 1,586,202 | |||
2,803,595 | |||||
Japan - 15.3% | |||||
Asics Corp. (A) | 87,090 | 1,326,803 | |||
Canon Inc. (A) | 27,900 | 1,094,298 | |||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Daikin Industries Ltd. (A) | 33,300 | $ | 1,144,203 | ||
Daito Trust Construction Co. Ltd. (A) | 16,310 | 1,534,807 | |||
Don Quijote Co. Ltd. (A) | 38,000 | 1,392,114 | |||
FANUC Corp. (A) | 4,400 | 818,241 | |||
Komatsu Ltd. (A) | 47,500 | 1,215,500 | |||
LIXIL Group Corp. (A) | 66,000 | 1,469,749 | |||
Seven & I Holdings Co. Ltd. (A) | 37,200 | 1,046,992 | |||
Softbank Corp. (A) | 21,200 | 775,745 | |||
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. (A) | 53,700 | 1,950,868 | |||
Yahoo! Japan Corp. (A) | 2,521 | 815,970 | |||
14,585,290 | |||||
Mexico - 0.9% | |||||
Genomma Lab Internacional S.A.B. de C.V. * | 416,700 | 856,204 | |||
Netherlands - 2.0% | |||||
ING Groep N.V. (A) * | 196,350 | 1,877,635 | |||
New Zealand - 0.7% | |||||
Telecom Corp. of New Zealand Ltd. (A) | 352,716 | 667,033 | |||
Philippines - 0.6% | |||||
BDO Unibank Inc. (A) * | 301,150 | 535,027 | |||
Russia - 1.5% | |||||
Sberbank of Russia (A) | 459,600 | 1,419,872 | |||
South Africa - 1.1% | |||||
Mediclinic International Ltd. (A) | 158,599 | 1,026,517 | |||
South Korea - 2.5% | |||||
Hyundai Mobis (A) | 4,232 | 1,147,831 | |||
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., GDR (A) | 1,779 | 1,264,343 | |||
2,412,174 | |||||
Spain - 2.4% | |||||
Mediaset Espana Comunicacion S.A. (A) | 177,783 | 1,224,209 | |||
Red Electrica Corp. S.A. (A) | 22,173 | 1,095,514 | |||
2,319,723 | |||||
Sweden - 5.4% | |||||
Assa Abloy AB (A) | 40,239 | 1,515,218 | |||
Getinge AB (A) | 30,603 | 1,036,711 | |||
Sandvik AB (A) | 87,345 | 1,403,855 | |||
Swedbank AB (A) | 59,766 | 1,176,099 | |||
5,131,883 | |||||
Switzerland - 4.6% | |||||
Novartis AG (A) | 52,425 | 3,319,106 | |||
Swatch Group AG/The (A) | 1,965 | 1,011,257 | |||
4,330,363 | |||||
Thailand - 1.0% | |||||
Krung Thai Bank PCL | 1,524,000 | 996,404 | |||
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
International Stock Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | |||||
COMMON STOCKS (continued) | ||||||
Turkey - 1.6% | ||||||
KOC Holding AS (A) | 114,302 | $ | 594,655 | |||
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (A) * | 149,050 | 964,351 | ||||
1,559,006 | ||||||
United Kingdom - 23.0% | ||||||
BG Group PLC (A) | 47,335 | 793,726 | ||||
BHP Billiton PLC (A) | 77,044 | 2,707,288 | ||||
British American Tobacco PLC (A) | 37,033 | 1,876,463 | ||||
Direct Line Insurance Group PLC (A) * | 268,768 | 939,895 | ||||
Informa PLC (A) | 265,979 | 1,967,701 | ||||
Petrofac Ltd. (A) | 31,391 | 850,471 | ||||
Prudential PLC (A) | 133,057 | 1,856,582 | ||||
Reed Elsevier PLC (A) | 105,680 | 1,109,629 | ||||
Rexam PLC (A) | 295,403 | 2,075,835 | ||||
Royal Dutch Shell PLC (A) | 72,881 | 2,575,216 | ||||
Signet Jewelers Ltd. (A) | 11,682 | 616,058 | ||||
Standard Chartered PLC (A) | 64,810 | 1,642,847 | ||||
Unilever PLC (A) | 75,610 | 2,869,991 | ||||
21,881,702 | ||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $75,337,507) | 93,622,941 | |||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 1.7% | ||||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 1,655,652 | 1,655,652 | ||||
Total Investment Companies (Cost $1,655,652) | 1,655,652 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 100.1% (Cost $76,993,159**) | 95,278,593 | |||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - (0.1%) | (96,488 | ) | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 95,182,105 | ||||
* | Non-income producing. |
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $77,447,915. |
(A) | Due to events that occurred between the close of the exchange on which this security is traded and that of the New York Stock Exchange, fair value was determined for this security using methods determined in good faith by or at the discretion of the Board of Trustees (see Note 2). |
ADR | American Depositary Receipt. |
GDR | Global Depositary Receipt. |
PLC | Public Limited Company. |
OTHER INFORMATION: | % of Net | ||
Sector Concentration | Assets | ||
Consumer Discretionary | 14 | % | |
Consumer Staples | 10 | % | |
Energy | 8 | % | |
Financials | 19 | % | |
Health Care | 14 | % | |
Industrials | 12 | % | |
Information Technology | 6 | % | |
Materials | 9 | % | |
Money Market Funds | 2 | % | |
Telecommunication Services | 4 | % | |
Utilities | 2 | % | |
Net Other Assets and Liabilities | – | ||
100 | % |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Madison Target Retirement 2020 Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 97.9% | |||||
Bond Funds - 52.0% | |||||
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 369,017 | $ | 4,018,593 | ||
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 216,058 | 2,447,935 | |||
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Advisor Class | 575,643 | 5,255,616 | |||
iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund ETF | 5,751 | 696,906 | |||
iShares Barclays TIPS Bond Fund ETF | 713 | 86,565 | |||
Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund Class I | 63,929 | 666,136 | |||
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 404,091 | 4,400,547 | |||
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Class | 180,033 | 2,001,963 | |||
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | 196,584 | 2,209,609 | |||
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 91,350 | 7,676,141 | |||
29,460,011 | |||||
Foreign Bond Funds - 2.8% | |||||
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund Class I | 167,032 | 1,556,737 | |||
Foreign Stock Funds - 8.6% | |||||
iShares MSCI EAFE Index Fund ETF | 5,024 | 285,464 | |||
IVA Worldwide Fund Class I | 83,219 | 1,323,184 | |||
Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF | 5,386 | 284,165 | |||
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 49,577 | 2,268,148 | |||
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund ETF | 19,392 | 715,177 | |||
4,876,138 | |||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Money Market Funds - 0.8% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 447,082 | $ | 447,082 | ||
Stock Funds - 33.7% | |||||
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 19,762 | 2,009,795 | |||
iShares S&P 100 Index Fund ETF | 41,765 | 2,701,360 | |||
iShares S&P Global Energy Sector Index Fund ETF | 10,408 | 398,106 | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index Fund | 360,026 | 3,866,676 | |||
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | 30,702 | 4,375,649 | |||
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 61,150 | 3,642,706 | |||
Vanguard Health Care ETF | 12,887 | 923,611 | |||
Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 16,570 | 1,145,153 | |||
19,063,056 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 97.9% (Cost $52,904,034**) | 55,403,024 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 2.1% | 1,204,266 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 56,607,290 | |||
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $53,405,823. |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Madison Target Retirement 2030 Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 100.0% | |||||
Bond Funds - 35.6% | |||||
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 339,027 | $ | 3,691,999 | ||
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 217,762 | 2,467,239 | |||
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Advisor Class | 609,190 | 5,561,909 | |||
iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund ETF | 6,862 | 831,537 | |||
iShares Barclays TIPS Bond Fund ETF | 840 | 101,984 | |||
Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund Class I | 46,448 | 483,993 | |||
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 396,481 | 4,317,676 | |||
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Class | 148,966 | 1,656,507 | |||
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | 160,021 | 1,798,641 | |||
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 39,541 | 3,322,630 | |||
24,234,115 | |||||
Foreign Bond Funds - 2.7% | |||||
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund Class I | 197,875 | 1,844,199 | |||
Foreign Stock Funds - 11.8% | |||||
iShares MSCI EAFE Index Fund ETF | 5,952 | 338,193 | |||
IVA Worldwide Fund Class I | 126,932 | 2,018,213 | |||
Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF | 6,492 | 342,518 | |||
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 93,601 | 4,282,246 | |||
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund ETF | 27,688 | 1,021,133 | |||
8,002,303 | |||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Money Market Funds - 1.4% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 938,288 | $ | 938,288 | ||
Stock Funds - 48.5% | |||||
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 34,606 | 3,519,430 | |||
iShares S&P 100 Index Fund ETF | 81,641 | 5,280,540 | |||
iShares S&P Global Energy Sector Index Fund ETF | 21,335 | 816,064 | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index Fund | 651,338 | 6,995,374 | |||
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | 56,307 | 8,024,874 | |||
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 82,516 | 4,915,478 | |||
Vanguard Health Care ETF | 20,439 | 1,464,863 | |||
Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 28,210 | 1,949,593 | |||
32,966,216 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 100.0% (Cost $64,617,960**) | 67,985,121 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.0% | 24,346 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 68,009,467 | |||
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $65,295,958. |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Madison Target Retirement 2040 Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 99.8% | |||||
Bond Funds - 25.4% | |||||
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 181,074 | $ | 1,971,892 | ||
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 134,557 | 1,524,527 | |||
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Advisor Class | 376,239 | 3,435,065 | |||
iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund ETF | 4,957 | 600,689 | |||
iShares Barclays TIPS Bond Fund ETF | 605 | 73,453 | |||
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 219,530 | 2,390,684 | |||
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Class | 70,097 | 779,481 | |||
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class | 61,532 | 691,618 | |||
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 12,404 | 1,042,308 | |||
12,509,717 | |||||
Foreign Bond Funds - 1.9% | |||||
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund Class I | 104,262 | 971,725 | |||
Foreign Stock Funds - 15.3% | |||||
iShares MSCI EAFE Index Fund ETF | 5,156 | 292,964 | |||
IVA Worldwide Fund Class I | 122,882 | 1,953,817 | |||
Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF | 5,597 | 295,298 | |||
Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 5,314 | 246,516 | |||
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF | 83,149 | 3,804,067 | |||
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund ETF | 25,300 | 933,064 | |||
7,525,726 | |||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Money Market Funds - 1.4% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 666,826 | $ | 666,826 | ||
Stock Funds - 55.8% | |||||
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 31,868 | 3,240,976 | |||
iShares S&P 100 Index Fund ETF | 70,011 | 4,528,312 | |||
iShares S&P Global Energy Sector Index Fund ETF | 19,525 | 746,831 | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index Fund | 540,235 | 5,802,124 | |||
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | 46,672 | 6,651,693 | |||
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 62,557 | 3,726,521 | |||
Vanguard Health Care ETF | 17,087 | 1,224,625 | |||
Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 22,776 | 1,574,049 | |||
27,495,131 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.8% (Cost $46,606,039**) | 49,169,125 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.2% | 99,505 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 49,268,630 | |||
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $47,149,568. |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund Portfolio of Investments
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES - 99.8% | |||||
Bond Funds - 15.3% | |||||
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 12,244 | $ | 133,336 | ||
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 12,736 | 144,293 | |||
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Advisor Class | 39,757 | 362,978 | |||
iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund ETF | 728 | 88,219 | |||
Metropolitan West Total Return Bond Fund Class I | 17,891 | 194,831 | |||
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4,065 | 45,205 | |||
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 1,491 | 125,289 | |||
1,094,151 | |||||
Foreign Bond Funds - 1.5% | |||||
TCW Emerging Markets Income Fund Class I | 11,336 | 105,652 | |||
Foreign Stock Funds - 18.4% | |||||
iShares MSCI EAFE Index Fund ETF | 744 | 42,274 | |||
IVA Worldwide Fund Class I | 22,288 | 354,383 | |||
Market Vectors Agribusiness ETF | 1,348 | 71,121 | |||
Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF | 770 | 35,720 | |||
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-U.S. ETF | 12,075 | 552,431 | |||
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund ETF | 7,176 | 264,651 | |||
1,320,580 | |||||
Shares | Value (Note 2) | ||||
Money Market Funds - 1.8% | |||||
State Street Institutional U.S. Government Money Market Fund | 131,941 | $ | 131,941 | ||
Stock Funds - 62.8% | |||||
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 5,096 | 518,263 | |||
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 768 | 60,065 | |||
iShares S&P 100 Index Fund ETF | 10,359 | 670,020 | |||
iShares S&P Global Energy Sector Index Fund ETF | 3,700 | 141,525 | |||
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index Fund | 102,037 | 1,095,881 | |||
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | 6,723 | 958,162 | |||
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 10,840 | 645,739 | |||
Vanguard Health Care ETF | 2,338 | 167,565 | |||
Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 3,453 | 238,637 | |||
4,495,857 | |||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 99.8% (Cost $6,831,788**) | 7,148,181 | ||||
NET OTHER ASSETS AND LIABILITIES - 0.2% | 11,901 | ||||
TOTAL NET ASSETS - 100.0% | $ | 7,160,082 | |||
** | Aggregate cost for Federal tax purposes was $6,904,344. |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund. |
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2012
Conservative | Moderate | Aggressive | Money | |||||||||
Allocation | Allocation | Allocation | Market | |||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | |||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||
Investments in securities, at cost | ||||||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | $118,362,775 | $177,195,734 | $68,291,152 | $50,111,524 | ||||||||
Affiliated issuers1 | 104,001,413 | 174,129,144 | 59,390,755 | – | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 2,763,309 | 5,871,645 | 2,351,251 | – | ||||||||
Affiliated issuers1 | 12,826,780 | 33,098,953 | 14,389,198 | – | ||||||||
Total investments at value | 237,954,277 | 390,295,476 | 144,422,356 | 50,111,524 | ||||||||
Foreign currency (cost of $185,201)(Note 2) | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||||||
Investments sold | 120,911 | 4,870,131 | 976,622 | – | ||||||||
Fund shares sold | 135,945 | 463,231 | 290,729 | 82,196 | ||||||||
Dividends and interest | 2,648,259 | 4,844,792 | 1,920,871 | 193,595 | ||||||||
Due from Adviser | – | – | – | 13,379 | ||||||||
Other assets | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Total assets | 240,859,392 | 400,473,630 | 147,610,578 | 50,400,694 | ||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||
Payables: | ||||||||||||
Investments purchased | 2,495,564 | 7,152,657 | 2,887,690 | – | ||||||||
Fund shares repurchased | 65,340 | 134,349 | 2,456 | 55,151 | ||||||||
Auditor fees | 12,471 | 21,081 | 7,991 | 2,841 | ||||||||
Management fees | 60,336 | 99,753 | 36,610 | 18,722 | ||||||||
Distribution fees – Class II | 9,058 | 7,315 | 412 | 303 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other payables | 16 | 2 | – | – | ||||||||
Total liabilities | 2,642,785 | 7,415,157 | 2,935,159 | 77,017 | ||||||||
Net assets applicable to outstanding capital stock | $238,216,607 | $393,058,473 | $144,675,419 | $50,323,677 | ||||||||
Net assets consist of: | ||||||||||||
Paid-in capital | $227,033,525 | $398,191,534 | $143,020,596 | $50,323,677 | ||||||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments sold and foreign currency related | ||||||||||||
transactions | (4,407,007 | ) | (44,103,659 | ) | (15,085,626 | ) | – | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments (including appreciation of foreign | ||||||||||||
currency related transactions) | 15,590,089 | 38,970,598 | 16,740,449 | – | ||||||||
Net Assets | $238,216,607 | $393,058,473 | $144,675,419 | $50,323,677 | ||||||||
Class I Shares: | ||||||||||||
Net Assets | $195,525,680 | $358,485,606 | $142,754,683 | $48,647,940 | ||||||||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 18,705,307 | 35,475,778 | 14,634,543 | 48,647,940 | ||||||||
Net Asset Value and redemption price per share | $10.45 | $10.11 | $9.75 | $1.00 | ||||||||
Class II Shares: | ||||||||||||
Net Assets | $42,690,927 | $34,572,867 | $1,920,736 | $1,675,737 | ||||||||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 4,092,439 | 3,429,909 | 197,521 | 1,675,737 | ||||||||
Net Asset Value and redemption price per share | $10.43 | $10.08 | $9.72 | $1.00 | ||||||||
1 See Note 10 for information on affiliated issuers.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
64
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2012
High | Diversified | Large Cap | Large Cap | |||||||||||
Bond | Income | Income | Value | Growth | Mid Cap | Small Cap | International | |||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | Stock Fund | |||||||
$353,513,467 | $63,119,017 | $337,039,351 | $419,444,600 | $274,660,820 | $289,097,518 | $10,222,918 | $76,993,159 | |||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||
33,283,501 | 3,103,784 | 55,546,546 | 81,872,571 | 71,304,093 | 82,422,696 | 3,287,925 | 18,285,434 | |||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||
386,796,968 | 66,222,801 | 392,585,897 | 501,317,171 | 345,964,913 | 371,520,214 | 13,510,843 | 95,278,593 | |||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | 185,567 | |||||||
– | – | – | 4,137,872 | 2,024,186 | 1,757,905 | – | – | |||||||
611,992 | 13,836 | 86,739 | 114,253 | 97,313 | 123,156 | 191 | 35,551 | |||||||
3,047,855 | 1,051,342 | 1,749,928 | 515,769 | 147,851 | 119,606 | 6,424 | 58,226 | |||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||
– | – | – | – | 4,285 | – | – | 133,211 | |||||||
390,456,815 | 67,287,979 | 394,422,564 | 506,085,065 | 348,238,548 | 373,520,881 | 13,517,458 | 95,691,148 | |||||||
– | – | – | 3,398,326 | – | 2,063,735 | 77,673 | 239,999 | |||||||
450,252 | 139,143 | 227,471 | 1,933,656 | 845,518 | 690,065 | 4,098 | 154,160 | |||||||
22,894 | 5,146 | 21,994 | 25,231 | 19,257 | 18,910 | 685 | 5,409 | |||||||
182,280 | 42,669 | 235,203 | 257,479 | 241,733 | 284,209 | 12,297 | 96,027 | |||||||
10,465 | 1,420 | 7,407 | 1,246 | 6,187 | 2,955 | 307 | 3,823 | |||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9,625 | |||||||
665,891 | 188,378 | 492,075 | 5,615,938 | 1,112,695 | 3,059,874 | 95,060 | 509,043 | |||||||
$389,790,924 | $67,099,601 | $393,930,489 | $500,469,127 | $347,125,853 | $370,461,007 | $13,422,398 | $95,182,105 | |||||||
$368,713,364 | $72,302,752 | $363,916,417 | $491,526,158 | $289,028,728 | $349,634,957 | $11,152,204 | $111,826,657 | |||||||
215,795 | 206,043 | 215,755 | 210,348 | 51,752 | 22,758 | – | 14,030 | |||||||
(12,421,736 | ) | (8,512,978 | ) | (25,748,229 | ) | (73,139,950 | ) | (13,258,720 | ) | (61,619,404 | ) | (1,017,731 | ) | (34,944,499) |
33,283,501 | 3,103,784 | 55,546,546 | 81,872,571 | 71,304,093 | 82,422,696 | 3,287,925 | 18,285,917 | |||||||
$389,790,924 | $67,099,601 | $393,930,489 | $500,469,127 | $347,125,853 | $370,461,007 | $13,422,398 | $95,182,105 | |||||||
$340,335,203 | $60,362,209 | $359,022,419 | $494,587,388 | $318,024,367 | $356,534,317 | $11,936,476 | $76,919,053 | |||||||
32,251,636 | 6,444,757 | 19,626,542 | 18,235,984 | 13,200,004 | 20,861,534 | 968,498 | 7,135,995 | |||||||
$10.55 | $9.37 | $18.29 | $27.12 | $24.09 | $17.09 | $12.32 | $10.78 | |||||||
$49,455,721 | $6,737,392 | $34,908,070 | $5,881,739 | $29,101,486 | $13,926,690 | $1,485,922 | $18,263,052 | |||||||
4,691,955 | 718,806 | 1,911,452 | 217,446 | 1,211,637 | 817,023 | 120,953 | 1,697,354 | |||||||
$10.54 | $9.37 | $18.26 | $27.05 | $24.02 | $17.05 | $12.29 | $10.76 | |||||||
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
65
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2012
Madison | Madison | Madison | Madison | |||||
Target | Target | Target | Target | |||||
Retirement | Retirement | Retirement | Retirement | |||||
2020 Fund | 2030 Fund | 2040 Fund | 2050 Fund | |||||
Assets: | ||||||||
Investments in securities, at cost | ||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | $52,904,034 | $64,617,960 | $46,606,039 | $6,831,788 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 2,498,990 | 3,367,161 | 2,563,086 | 316,393 | ||||
Total investments at value | 55,403,024 | 67,985,121 | 49,169,125 | 7,148,181 | ||||
Cash | 38,953 | 18,839 | 5,763 | 672 | ||||
Receivables: | ||||||||
Investments sold | 2,154,968 | 701,789 | 611,902 | 103,401 | ||||
Fund shares sold | 128,369 | 194,823 | 206,868 | 69,241 | ||||
Dividends and interest | 170,958 | 192,513 | 118,249 | 12,653 | ||||
Total assets | 57,896,272 | 69,093,085 | 50,111,907 | 7,334,148 | ||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||
Payables: | ||||||||
Investments purchased | 1,274,537 | 1,034,496 | 822,729 | 167,143 | ||||
Fund shares repurchased | 195 | 32,134 | 8,283 | 5,197 | ||||
Management fees | 11,873 | 14,155 | 10,220 | 1,438 | ||||
Service agreement fees | 2,377 | 2,833 | 2,045 | 288 | ||||
Total liabilities | 1,288,982 | 1,083,618 | 843,277 | 174,066 | ||||
Net assets applicable to outstanding capital stock | $56,607,290 | $68,009,467 | $49,268,630 | $7,160,082 | ||||
Net assets consist of: | ||||||||
Paid-in capital | $54,484,227 | $65,239,542 | $47,180,500 | $6,908,840 | ||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | – | – | – | – | ||||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments sold and foreign currency related | ||||||||
transactions | (375,927 | ) | (597,236 | ) | (474,956 | ) | (65,151) | |
Net unrealized appreciation of investments (including appreciation of foreign | ||||||||
currency related transactions) | 2,498,990 | 3,367,161 | 2,563,086 | 316,393 | ||||
Net Assets | $56,607,290 | $68,009,467 | $49,268,630 | $7,160,082 | ||||
Class I Shares: | ||||||||
Net Assets | $56,607,290 | $68,009,467 | $49,268,630 | $7,160,082 | ||||
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | 6,810,862 | 8,462,795 | 6,476,739 | 670,081 | ||||
Net Asset Value and redemption price per share | $8.31 | $8.04 | $7.61 | $10.69 | ||||
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
66
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Operations for the Period Ended December 31, 2012
Conservative | Moderate | Aggressive | Money | |||||
Allocation | Allocation | Allocation | Market | |||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | |||||
Investment Income: | ||||||||
Interest | $503 | $719 | $395 | $59,193 | ||||
Dividends |
Unaffiliated issuers
Affiliated issuers1
Less: Foreign taxes withheld
Total investment income
Management fees
Audit fees
Trustees’ fees
Distribution fees – Class II
Other expenses
Total expenses before reimbursement/waiver
Less reimbursement/waiver2
Total expenses net of reimbursement/waiver
Net realized gain (loss) on investments (including net realized gain (loss) on foreign
currency related transactions)3
Unaffiliated issuers
Affiliated issuers1
Capital gain distributions received from underlying funds
Unaffiliated issuers
Affiliated issuers1
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments (including net
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on foreign currency related transactions)4
Unaffiliated issuers
Affiliated issuers1
1 | See Note 10 for information on affiliated issuers. |
2 | Waiver includes management fees of $195,149, and distribution fees of $2,248, for the Money Market Fund. |
3 | Includes foreign capital gains taxes paid of $16,623 for the International Stock Fund. |
4 | Net of change in deferred foreign capital gains taxes of $9,625 for the International Stock Fund. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
67
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Operations for the Period Ended December 31, 2012
High | Diversified | Large Cap | ||||||||||
Bond | Income | Income | Value | |||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Fund | |||||||||
Investment Income: | ||||||||||||
Interest | $15,310,482 | $6,145,623 | $6,638,082 | $ 5,807 | ||||||||
Dividends | ||||||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | – | 17,438 | 7,115,032 | 13,745,217 | ||||||||
Affiliated issuers1 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Less: Foreign taxes withheld | – | – | (33,689 | ) | (94,811 | ) | ||||||
Total investment income | 15,310,482 | 6,163,061 | 13,719,425 | 13,656,213 | ||||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||||||
Management fees | 2,278,703 | 654,589 | 2,822,232 | 3,079,980 | ||||||||
Audit fees | 37,894 | 8,146 | 36,994 | 47,433 | ||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 20,960 | 4,544 | 19,947 | 25,119 | ||||||||
Distribution fees – Class II | 123,329 | 16,179 | 82,765 | 14,717 | ||||||||
Service agreement fees4 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Other expenses | 6 | 42 | 3 | – | ||||||||
Total expenses before reimbursement/waiver | 2,460,892 | 683,500 | 2,961,941 | 3,167,249 | ||||||||
Less reimbursement/waiver | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Total expenses net of reimbursement/waiver | 2,460,892 | 683,500 | 2,961,941 | 3,167,249 | ||||||||
Net Investment Income | 12,849,590 | 5,479,561 | 10,757,484 | 10,488,964 | ||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments (including net realized gain (loss) on foreign currency related transactions)2 | ||||||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | 255,801 | 3,222,281 | 6,819,611 | 22,534,576 | ||||||||
Affiliated issuers1 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Capital gain distributions received from underlying funds | ||||||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Affiliated issuers1 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments (including net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on foreign currency related transactions)3 | ||||||||||||
Unaffiliated issuers | (41,918 | ) | 860,384 | 14,057,412 | 24,248,240 | |||||||
Affiliated issuers1 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain on Investments | 213,883 | 4,082,665 | 20,877,023 | 46,782,816 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations | $13,063,473 | $9,562,226 | $31,634,507 | $57,271,780 | ||||||||
1 | See Note 10 for information on affiliated issuers. |
2 | Includes foreign capital gains taxes paid of $16,623 for the International Stock Fund. |
3 | Net of change in deferred foreign capital gains taxes of $9,625 for the International Stock Fund. |
4 | See Note 3 for information on service agreement fees. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
68
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Operations for the Period Ended December 31, 2012
Madison | Madison | Madison | Madison | ||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap | Target | Target | Target | Target | |||||||||||||||||
Growth | Mid Cap | Small Cap | International | Retirement | Retirement | Retirement | Retirement | ||||||||||||||
Fund | Fund | Fund | Stock Fund | 2020 Fund | 2030 Fund | 2040 Fund | 2050 Fund | ||||||||||||||
$3,592 | $6,358 | $101 | $6,274 | $151 | $188 | $143 | $25 | ||||||||||||||
5,860,990 | 4,603,125 | 305,845 | 2,950,833 | 1,580,007 | 1,790,411 | 1,237,285 | 141,743 | ||||||||||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
(28,963 | ) | (71,212 | ) | – | (246,069 | ) | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
5,835,619 | 4,538,271 | 305,946 | 2,711,038 | 1,580,158 | 1,790,599 | 1,237,428 | 141,768 | ||||||||||||||
2,973,834 | 3,354,279 | 143,011 | 1,103,516 | 120,883 | 142,264 | 104,554 | 11,023 | ||||||||||||||
34,257 | 33,910 | 1,185 | 8,409 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
18,537 | 18,589 | 646 | 4,520 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
73,275 | 34,711 | 3,615 | 42,259 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
– | – | – | – | 24,176 | 28,453 | 20,911 | 2,205 | ||||||||||||||
2,103 | – | 67 | 232 | 539 | 553 | 482 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
3,102,006 | 3,441,489 | 148,524 | 1,158,936 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
3,102,006 | 3,441,489 | 148,524 | 1,158,936 | 145,598 | 171,270 | 125,947 | 13,243 | ||||||||||||||
2,733,613 | 1,096,782 | 157,422 | 1,552,102 | 1,434,560 | 1,619,329 | 1,111,481 | 128,525 | ||||||||||||||
5,568,234 | 12,645,399 | 585,925 | 2,784,165 | (182,476 | ) | (112,211 | ) | (25,695 | ) | (12,307 | ) | ||||||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
– | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||
– | – | – | – | 347,650 | 315,166 | 166,574 | 13,840 | ||||||||||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
31,642,311 | 42,480,016 | 1,117,532 | 13,554,327 | 2,879,364 | 3,982,918 | 3,160,888 | 333,215 | ||||||||||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||
37,210,545 | 55,125,415 | 1,703,457 | 16,338,492 | 3,044,538 | 4,185,873 | 3,301,767 | 334,748 | ||||||||||||||
$39,944,158 | $56,222,197 | $1,860,879 | $17,890,594 | $4,479,098 | $5,805,202 | $4,413,248 | $? 463,273 | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
69
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Conservative Allocation Fund | Moderate Allocation Fund | |||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
Net Assets at beginning of period | $227,634,129 | $231,082,035 | $382,606,027 | $384,260,026 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations: | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | 6,404,623 | 6,421,140 | 9,024,664 | 7,973,809 | ||||||||
Net realized gain on investment transactions | 5,954,390 | 1,603,964 | 10,957,642 | 4,470,788 | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments transactions | 7,620,015 | (1,101,366 | ) | 19,170,279 | (4,681,805 | ) | ||||||
Net increase in net assets from operations | 19,979,028 | 6,923,738 | 39,152,585 | 7,762,792 | ||||||||
Distributions to shareholders from: | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | ||||||||||||
Class I | (7,226,155 | ) | (6,348,062 | ) | (10,646,775 | ) | (9,241,042 | ) | ||||
Class II | (1,526,152 | ) | (1,388,479 | ) | (985,020 | ) | (885,425 | ) | ||||
Return of Capital | ||||||||||||
Class I | – | (127,373 | ) | – | – | |||||||
Class II | – | (28,768 | ) | – | – | |||||||
Total distributions | (8,752,307 | ) | (7,892,682 | ) | (11,631,795 | ) | (10,126,467 | ) | ||||
Capital Stock transactions: | ||||||||||||
Class I Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 36,406,472 | 20,354,867 | 45,709,365 | 23,367,824 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 7,226,139 | 6,475,435 | 10,646,773 | 9,241,042 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (41,688,374 | ) | (37,440,903 | ) | (69,665,565 | ) | (36,466,538 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital stock transactions | 1,944,237 | (10,610,601 | ) | (13,309,427 | ) | (3,857,672 | ) | |||||
Class II Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 1,950,081 | 9,767,995 | 1,099,583 | 6,691,106 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 1,526,152 | 1,417,247 | 985,020 | 885,425 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (6,064,713 | ) | (3,053,604 | ) | (5,843,520 | ) | (3,009,183 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital stock transactions | (2,588,480 | ) | 8,131,638 | (3,758,917 | ) | 4,567,348 | ||||||
Total increase (decrease) from capital stock transactions | (644,243 | ) | (2,478,963 | ) | (17,068,344 | ) | 709,676 | |||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets | 10,582,478 | (3,447,906 | ) | 10,452,446 | (1,653,999 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets at end of period | $238,216,607 | $227,634,129 | $393,058,473 | $382,606,027 | ||||||||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) included in net assets | $– | $– | $– | $– | ||||||||
Capital Share transactions: | ||||||||||||
Class I Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 3,483,197 | 1,989,887 | 4,586,565 | 2,426,221 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 691,344 | 649,610 | 1,053,646 | 980,151 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (3,985,882 | ) | (3,674,546 | ) | (6,964,923 | ) | (3,768,817 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) from capital share transactions | 188,659 | (1,035,049 | ) | (1,324,712 | ) | (362,445 | ) | |||||
Class II Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 187,427 | 955,023 | 112,305 | 685,655 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 146,308 | 142,423 | 97,726 | 94,103 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (582,367 | ) | (298,720 | ) | (592,373 | ) | (313,358 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) from capital share transactions | (248,632 | ) | 798,726 | (382,342 | ) | 466,400 | ||||||
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
70
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Aggressive Allocation Fund | Money Market Fund | Bond Fund | High Income Fund | |||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
$134,360,528 | $127,694,004 | $62,660,366 | $70,211,054 | $425,099,202 | $465,248,826 | $92,675,282 | $99,838,101 | |||||||||||||||
2,537,833 | 1,663,434 | – | – | 12,849,590 | 15,963,320 | 5,479,561 | 6,540,601 | |||||||||||||||
5,179,817 | 3,126,456 | – | – | 255,801 | 1,004,732 | 3,222,281 | 1,733,903 | |||||||||||||||
7,348,417 | (4,143,997 | ) | – | – | (41,918 | ) | 11,605,808 | 860,384 | (3,502,188 | ) | ||||||||||||
15,066,067 | 645,893 | – | – | 13,063,473 | 28,573,860 | 9,562,226 | 4,772,316 | |||||||||||||||
(3,193,957 | ) | (2,322,867 | ) | – | – | (11,250,243 | ) | (14,079,587 | ) | (5,116,320 | ) | (6,211,217 | ) | |||||||||
(39,884 | ) | (28,384 | ) | – | – | (1,526,409 | ) | (1,752,712 | ) | (542,703 | ) | (428,405 | ) | |||||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||
– | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||||||
(3,233,841 | ) | (2,351,251 | ) | – | – | (12,776,652 | ) | (15,832,299 | ) | (5,659,023 | ) | (6,639,622 | ) | |||||||||
30,425,398 | 16,814,313 | 15,456,536 | 26,296,004 | 80,281,951 | 32,933,180 | 6,340,313 | 3,676,230 | |||||||||||||||
3,193,957 | 2,322,867 | – | – | 11,250,243 | 14,079,587 | 5,116,320 | 6,211,217 | |||||||||||||||
(35,113,393 | ) | (11,163,455 | ) | (28,490,349 | ) | (34,247,892 | ) | (126,901,735 | ) | (112,759,403 | ) | (41,331,439 | ) | (17,304,019 | ) | |||||||
(1,494,038 | ) | 7,973,725 | (13,033,813 | ) | (7,951,888 | ) | (35,369,541 | ) | (65,746,636 | ) | (29,874,806 | ) | (7,416,572 | ) | ||||||||
103,181 | 467,480 | 2,213,981 | 2,272,356 | 3,009,622 | 12,844,910 | 356,009 | 1,915,219 | |||||||||||||||
39,884 | 28,384 | – | – | 1,526,409 | 1,752,712 | 542,703 | 428,405 | |||||||||||||||
(166,362 | ) | (97,707 | ) | (1,516,857 | ) | (1,871,156 | ) | (4,761,589 | ) | (1,742,169 | ) | (502,790 | ) | (222,564 | ) | |||||||
(23,297 | ) | 398,157 | 697,124 | 401,200 | (225,558 | ) | 12,855,453 | 395,922 | 2,121,060 | |||||||||||||
(1,517,335 | ) | 8,371,882 | (12,336,689 | ) | (7,550,688 | ) | (35,595,099 | ) | (52,891,183 | ) | (29,478,884 | ) | (5,295,512 | ) | ||||||||
10,314,891 | 6,666,524 | (12,336,689 | ) | (7,550,688 | ) | (35,308,278 | ) | (40,149,624 | ) | (25,575,681 | ) | (7,162,819 | ) | |||||||||
$144,675,419 | $134,360,528 | $50,323,677 | $62,660,366 | $389,790,924 | $425,099,202 | $67,099,601 | $92,675,282 | |||||||||||||||
$ – | $ – | $– | $– | $215,795 | $270,176 | $206,043 | $118,232 | |||||||||||||||
3,188,342 | 1,829,853 | 15,456,536 | 26,296,004 | 7,495,349 | 3,144,908 | 651,888 | 380,515 | |||||||||||||||
327,438 | 259,040 | – | – | 1,064,171 | 1,333,622 | 545,827 | 675,860 | |||||||||||||||
(3,674,003 | ) | (1,205,025 | ) | (28,490,349 | ) | (34,247,892 | ) | (11,809,745 | ) | (10,714,251 | ) | (4,170,438 | ) | (1,786,259 | ) | |||||||
(158,223 | ) | 883,868 | (13,033,813 | ) | (7,951,888 | ) | (3,250,225 | ) | (6,235,721 | ) | (2,972,723 | ) | (729,884 | ) | ||||||||
10,752 | 49,960 | 2,213,981 | 2,272,356 | 279,678 | 1,232,926 | 36,572 | 197,713 | |||||||||||||||
4,102 | 3,173 | – | – | 144,622 | 166,154 | 57,879 | 46,641 | |||||||||||||||
(16,989 | ) | (10,546 | ) | (1,516,857 | ) | (1,871,156 | ) | (444,157 | ) | (163,213 | ) | (51,896 | ) | (23,060 | ) | |||||||
(2,135 | ) | 42,587 | 697,124 | 401,200 | (19,857 | ) | 1,235,867 | 42,555 | 221,294 | |||||||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
71
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Diversified Income Fund | Large Cap Value Fund | |||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
Net Assets at beginning of period | $403,211,434 | $407,017,583 | $491,674,493 | $530,247,917 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations: | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | 10,757,484 | 11,868,731 | 10,488,964 | 10,296,797 | ||||||||
Net realized gain on investments transactions | 6,819,611 | 16,259,876 | 22,534,576 | 31,920,133 | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments transactions | 14,057,412 | 2,343,286 | 24,248,240 | (5,336,866 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | 31,634,507 | 30,471,893 | 57,271,780 | 36,880,064 | ||||||||
Distributions to shareholders from: | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | ||||||||||||
Class I | (9,820,039 | ) | (11,046,222 | ) | (10,356,142 | ) | (10,095,971 | ) | ||||
Class II | (889,234 | ) | (837,747 | ) | (112,931 | ) | (109,873 | ) | ||||
Total distributions | (10,709,273 | ) | (11,883,969 | ) | (10,469,073 | ) | (10,205,844 | ) | ||||
Capital Stock transactions: | ||||||||||||
Class I Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 33,291,125 | 8,647,928 | 69,507,711 | 13,848,340 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 9,820,039 | 11,046,222 | 10,356,143 | 10,095,971 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (76,259,090 | ) | (48,976,196 | ) | (117,526,447 | ) | (89,269,316 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in net assets from capital stock transactions | (33,147,926 | ) | (29,282,046 | ) | (37,662,593 | ) | (65,325,005 | ) | ||||
Class II Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 5,148,640 | 8,977,582 | 224,114 | 544,221 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 889,234 | 837,747 | 112,931 | 109,873 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (3,096,127 | ) | (2,927,356 | ) | (682,525 | ) | (576,733 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital stock transactions | 2,941,747 | 6,887,973 | (345,480 | ) | 77,361 | |||||||
Total net decrease from capital stock transactions | (30,206,179 | ) | (22,394,073 | ) | (38,008,073 | ) | (65,247,644 | ) | ||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets | (9,280,945 | ) | (3,806,149 | ) | 8,794,634 | (38,573,424 | ) | |||||
Net Assets at end of period | $393,930,489 | $403,211,434 | $500,469,127 | $491,674,493 | ||||||||
Undistributed net investment income (loss) included in net assets | $215,755 | $207,484 | $210,348 | $190,026 | ||||||||
Capital Share transactions: | ||||||||||||
Class I Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 1,813,514 | 502,323 | 2,587,667 | 559,931 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 539,704 | 634,293 | 386,381 | 405,964 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (4,167,601 | ) | (2,847,528 | ) | (4,353,429 | ) | (3,629,634 | ) | ||||
Net decrease from capital share transactions | (1,814,383 | ) | (1,710,912 | ) | (1,379,381 | ) | (2,663,739 | ) | ||||
Class II Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 284,063 | 526,321 | 8,317 | 22,164 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 48,943 | 48,142 | 4,222 | 4,426 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (169,225 | ) | (170,150 | ) | (25,462 | ) | (23,662 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) from capital share transactions | 163,781 | 404,313 | (12,923 | ) | 2,928 | |||||||
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
72
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Large Cap Growth Fund | Mid Cap Fund | Small Cap Fund | International Stock Fund | |||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||
$358,620,849 | $395,446,443 | $365,102,889 | $397,169,596 | $12,661,690 | $13,097,057 | $88,163,466 | $105,304,241 | |||||||||||||||
2,733,613 | 872,256 | 1,096,782 | 602,185 | 157,422 | 50,950 | 1,552,102 | 1,855,913 | |||||||||||||||
5,568,234 | 39,422,276 | 12,645,399 | 36,438,566 | 585,925 | 357,045 | 2,784,165 | 3,479,732 | |||||||||||||||
31,642,311 | (44,255,836 | ) | 42,480,016 | (19,534,163 | ) | 1,117,532 | (368,723 | ) | 13,554,327 | (12,765,450 | ) | |||||||||||
39,944,158 | (3,961,304 | ) | 56,222,197 | 17,506,588 | 1,860,879 | 39,272 | 17,890,594 | (7,429,805 | ) | |||||||||||||
(2,515,455 | ) | (861,866 | ) | (1,067,719 | ) | (687,090 | ) | (139,045 | ) | (45,846 | ) | (1,223,367 | ) | (1,510,650 | ) | |||||||
(189,383 | ) | (31,319 | ) | (22,229 | ) | (4,200 | ) | (15,378 | ) | (3,723 | ) | (263,629 | ) | (291,401 | ) | |||||||
(2,704,838 | ) | (893,185 | ) | (1,089,948 | ) | (691,290 | ) | (154,423 | ) | (49,569 | ) | (1,486,996 | ) | (1,802,051 | ) | |||||||
51,759,146 | 11,740,628 | 46,160,581 | 14,847,888 | 567,964 | 1,567,954 | 6,139,330 | 3,327,511 | |||||||||||||||
2,515,455 | 861,866 | 1,067,719 | 687,090 | 139,045 | 45,846 | 1,223,367 | 1,510,650 | |||||||||||||||
(101,706,126 | ) | (51,986,645 | ) | (95,640,480 | ) | (65,250,198 | ) | (1,550,153 | ) | (2,049,990 | ) | (16,609,228 | ) | (16,569,485 | ) | |||||||
(47,431,525 | ) | (39,384,151 | ) | (48,412,180 | ) | (49,715,220 | ) | (843,144 | ) | (436,190 | ) | (9,246,531 | ) | (11,731,324 | ) | |||||||
1,039,287 | 8,340,118 | 205,290 | 1,744,989 | 28,404 | 290,607 | 867,658 | 4,073,516 | |||||||||||||||
189,383 | 31,319 | 22,229 | 4,200 | 15,378 | 3,723 | 263,629 | 291,401 | |||||||||||||||
(2,531,461 | ) | (958,391 | ) | (1,589,470 | ) | (915,974 | ) | (146,386 | ) | (283,210 | ) | (1,269,715 | ) | (542,512 | ) | |||||||
(1,302,791 | ) | 7,413,046 | (1,361,951 | ) | 833,215 | (102,604 | ) | 11,120 | (138,428 | ) | 3,822,405 | |||||||||||
(48,734,316 | ) | (31,971,105 | ) | (49,774,131 | ) | (48,882,005 | ) | (945,748 | ) | (425,070 | ) | (9,384,959 | ) | (7,908,919 | ) | |||||||
(11,494,996 | ) | (36,825,594 | ) | 5,358,118 | (32,066,707 | ) | 760,708 | (435,367 | ) | 7,018,639 | (17,140,775 | ) | ||||||||||
$347,125,853 | $358,620,849 | $370,461,007 | $365,102,889 | $13,422,398 | $12,661,690 | $95,182,105 | $88,163,466 | |||||||||||||||
$51,752 | $23,005 | $22,758 | $15,924 | $– | $– | $14,030 | $(78) | |||||||||||||||
2,172,455 | 521,785 | 2,819,510 | 993,405 | 49,083 | 142,303 | 624,736 | 332,788 | |||||||||||||||
106,135 | 39,349 | 63,373 | 46,410 | 11,463 | 4,205 | 114,510 | 167,339 | |||||||||||||||
(4,235,335 | ) | (2,310,549 | ) | (5,878,665 | ) | (4,419,911 | ) | (133,951 | ) | (193,625 | ) | (1,660,974 | ) | (1,658,271 | ) | |||||||
(1,956,745 | ) | (1,749,415 | ) | (2,995,782 | ) | (3,380,096 | ) | (73,405 | ) | (47,117 | ) | (921,728 | ) | (1,158,144 | ) | |||||||
44,301 | 368,460 | 12,749 | 117,974 | 2,393 | 26,862 | 91,269 | 403,814 | |||||||||||||||
8,013 | 1,433 | 1,321 | 284 | 1,272 | 342 | 24,683 | 32,404 | |||||||||||||||
(106,446 | ) | (43,744 | ) | (98,269 | ) | (62,644 | ) | (12,565 | ) | (26,457 | ) | (126,337 | ) | (54,302 | ) | |||||||
(54,132 | ) | 326,149 | (84,199 | ) | 55,614 | (8,900 | ) | 747 | (10,385 | ) | 381,916 | |||||||||||
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
73
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Madison Target | Madison Target | |||||||||||
Retirement 2020 Fund | Retirement 2030 Fund | |||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
Net Assets at beginning of period | $39,580,036 | $27,647,785 | $45,404,453 | $31,278,843 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations: | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | 1,434,560 | 927,037 | 1,619,329 | 923,593 | ||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 165,174 | 2,004,820 | 202,955 | 2,414,365 | ||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 2,879,364 | (2,269,004 | ) | 3,982,918 | (2,911,351 | ) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | 4,479,098 | 662,853 | 5,805,202 | 426,607 | ||||||||
Distributions to shareholders from: | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | ||||||||||||
Class I | (1,667,275 | ) | (1,096,421 | ) | (1,812,454 | ) | (1,091,758 | ) | ||||
Net realized gains | ||||||||||||
Class I | (178,482 | ) | (897,737 | ) | (440,797 | ) | (1,764,696 | ) | ||||
Return of Capital | ||||||||||||
Class I | – | – | – | – | ||||||||
Total distributions | (1,845,757 | ) | (1,994,158 | ) | (2,253,251 | ) | (2,856,454 | ) | ||||
Capital Stock transactions: | ||||||||||||
Class I Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 26,778,150 | 15,901,069 | 29,952,292 | 15,550,888 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 1,845,756 | 1,994,158 | 2,253,248 | 2,856,454 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (14,229,993 | ) | (4,631,671 | ) | (13,152,477 | ) | (1,851,885 | ) | ||||
Net increase from capital stock transactions | 14,393,913 | 13,263,556 | 19,053,063 | 16,555,457 | ||||||||
Total increase in net assets | 17,027,254 | 11,932,250 | 22,605,014 | 14,125,610 | ||||||||
Net Assets at end of period | $56,607,290 | $39,580,036 | $68,009,467 | $45,404,453 | ||||||||
Undistributed net investment income included in net assets | $– | $– | $– | $– | ||||||||
Capital Share transactions: | ||||||||||||
Class I Shares | ||||||||||||
Shares sold | 3,249,949 | 1,939,616 | 3,774,920 | 1,952,016 | ||||||||
Issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | 222,629 | 255,016 | 281,135 | 381,214 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (1,725,495 | ) | (560,216 | ) | (1,656,361 | ) | (228,251 | ) | ||||
Net increase from capital share transactions | 1,747,083 | 1,634,416 | 2,399,694 | 2,104,979 | ||||||||
1 | The Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund commenced operations on January 3, 2011. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
74
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Madison Target | Madison Target | |||||||||
Retirement 2040 Fund | Retirement 2050 Fund | |||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 20111 | |||||||
$35,182,268 | $26,146,753 | $2,236,241 | $– | |||||||
1,111,481 | 642,632 | 128,525 | 27,410 | |||||||
140,879 | 2,303,584 | 1,533 | (29,923 | ) | ||||||
3,160,888 | (2,809,726 | ) | 333,215 | (16,822 | ) | |||||
4,413,248 | 136,490 | 463,273 | (19,335 | ) | ||||||
(1,199,277 | ) | (767,165 | ) | (134,118 | ) | (31,450 | ) | |||
(401,247 | ) | (1,885,854 | ) | (27,128 | ) | – | ||||
– | – | – | (1,099 | ) | ||||||
(1,600,524 | ) | (2,653,019 | ) | (161,246 | ) | (32,549 | ) | |||
21,643,373 | 10,698,786 | 5,538,045 | 2,473,782 | |||||||
1,600,523 | 2,653,019 | 161,246 | 32,549 | |||||||
(11,970,258 | ) | (1,799,761 | ) | (1,077,477 | ) | (218,206 | ) | |||
11,273,638 | 11,552,044 | 4,621,814 | 2,288,125 | |||||||
14,086,362 | 9,035,515 | 4,923,841 | 2,236,241 | |||||||
$49,268,630 | $35,182,268 | $7,160,082 | $2,236,241 | |||||||
$– | $– | $– | $– | |||||||
2,875,883 | 1,399,765 | 528,566 | 248,588 | |||||||
210,569 | 375,570 | 15,091 | 3,338 | |||||||
(1,594,072 | ) | (230,919 | ) | (102,883 | ) | (22,619 | ) | |||
1,492,380 | 1,544,416 | 440,774 | 229,307 | |||||||
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
75
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
CONSERVATIVE ALLOCATION FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.96 | $10.01 | $9.61 | $8.48 | $10.77 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.35 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.60 | 0.03 | 0.52 | 1.12 | (2.27 | ) | |||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.89 | 0.31 | 0.81 | 1.41 | (1.92 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.40 | ) | (0.35 | ) | (0.41 | ) | (0.28 | ) | (0.27 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.10 | ) | |||||||||
Distributions from return of capital | – | (0.01 | ) | – | – | – | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.40 | ) | (0.36 | ) | (0.41 | ) | (0.28 | ) | (0.37 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.49 | (0.05 | ) | 0.40 | 1.13 | (2.29 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.45 | $9.96 | $10.01 | $9.61 | $8.48 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 8.98 | 3.14 | 8.37 | 16.76 | (17.89 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $195,526 | $184,431 | $195,657 | $176,322 | $116,678 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets: | |||||||||||||||
Before management fee reduction (%) | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | ||||||||||
After management fee reduction (%) | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.28 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.79 | 2.76 | 2.90 | 3.23 | 3.53 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 44 | 36 | 36 | 47 | 71 | ||||||||||
Inception to | |||||||||||||||
CLASS II | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.95 | $10.00 | $9.61 | $8.51 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.35 | 0.28 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.61 | 0.02 | 0.43 | 0.99 | |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.87 | 0.29 | 0.78 | 1.27 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.39 | ) | (0.33 | ) | (0.39 | ) | (0.17 | ) | |||||||
Distributions from return of capital | – | (0.01 | ) | – | – | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.48 | (0.05 | ) | 0.39 | 1.10 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.43 | $9.95 | $10.00 | $9.61 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 8.71 | 2.89 | 8.10 | 14.91 | 4 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $42,691 | $43,203 | $35,425 | $12,829 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.49 | 2.67 | 3.47 | 4.38 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 44 | 36 | 36 | 47 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009 | |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. | |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. | |
4 | Not annualized. | |
5 | Annualized. | |
6 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
76
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
MODERATE ALLOCATION FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.42 | $9.49 | $8.87 | $7.51 | $11.21 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.21 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.77 | (0.01 | ) | 0.71 | 1.37 | (3.55 | ) | ||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.91 | 1.55 | (3.34 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.31 | ) | (0.26 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.17 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.19 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.31 | ) | (0.26 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.36 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.69 | (0.07 | ) | 0.62 | 1.36 | (3.70 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.11 | $9.42 | $9.49 | $8.87 | $7.51 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 10.54 | 2.03 | 10.22 | 20.61 | (30.23 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $358,486 | $346,733 | $352,545 | $332,428 | $243,761 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets: | |||||||||||||||
Before management fee reduction (%) | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | ||||||||||
After management fee reduction (%) | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.28 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.32 | 2.07 | 2.24 | 2.29 | 2.20 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 49 | 25 | 34 | 52 | 69 | ||||||||||
Inception to | |||||||||||||||
CLASS II | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.41 | $9.48 | $8.87 | $7.56 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.19 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.77 | (0.01 | ) | 0.63 | 1.24 | ||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.88 | 1.43 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.30 | ) | (0.24 | ) | (0.27 | ) | (0.12 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.67 | (0.07 | ) | 0.61 | 1.31 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.08 | $9.41 | $9.48 | $8.87 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 10.26 | 1.78 | 9.94 | 18.82 | 4 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $34,573 | $35,873 | $31,715 | $12,162 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.01 | 1.86 | 2.76 | 3.33 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 49 | 25 | 34 | 52 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009. | |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. | |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. | |
4 | Not annualized. | |
5 | Annualized. | |
6 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
77
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
AGGRESSIVE ALLOCATION FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $8.96 | $9.08 | $8.30 | $6.57 | $11.61 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.09 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.84 | (0.08 | ) | 0.81 | 1.74 | (4.74 | ) | ||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.01 | 0.04 | 0.92 | 1.84 | (4.65 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.22 | ) | (0.16 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.06 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.33 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.22 | ) | (0.16 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.39 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.79 | (0.12 | ) | 0.78 | 1.73 | (5.04 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $9.75 | $8.96 | $9.08 | $8.30 | $6.57 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 11.34 | 0.48 | 11.15 | 27.91 | (41.09 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $142,755 | $132,575 | $126,270 | $114,492 | $69,616 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets: | |||||||||||||||
Before management fee reduction (%) | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | ||||||||||
After management fee reduction (%) | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.28 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 1.80 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 1.44 | 0.94 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 69 | 32 | 33 | 58 | 67 | ||||||||||
Inception to | |||||||||||||||
CLASS II | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $8.95 | $9.07 | $8.30 | $6.69 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.15 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.83 | (0.08 | ) | 0.73 | 1.54 | ||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.98 | 0.02 | 0.90 | 1.69 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.21 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.08 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.77 | (0.12 | ) | 0.77 | 1.61 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $9.72 | $8.95 | $9.07 | $8.30 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 11.06 | 0.23 | 10.87 | 25.09 | 4 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $1,921 | $1,786 | $1,424 | $514 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 1.55 | 1.05 | 1.99 | 2.86 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 69 | 32 | 33 | 58 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009. | |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. | |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. | |
4 | Not annualized. | |
5 | Annualized. | |
6 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
78
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
MONEY MARKET FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | – | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | 0.02 | |||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | – | – | – | – | 0.00 | 4 | |||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 | ||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | – | – | – | (0.00 | )4 | (0.02 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase in net asset value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $48,648 | $61,682 | $69,634 | $92,463 | $159,349 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets: | |||||||||||||||
Before waiver of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.47 | ||||||||||
After waiver of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.11 | 7 | 0.08 | 7 | 0.14 | 7 | 0.28 | 7 | 0.47 | ||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.67 | ||||||||||
Inception to | |||||||||||||||
CLASS II | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||
Net increase in net asset value | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | $1.00 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $1,676 | $979 | $577 | $185 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets: | |||||||||||||||
Before waiver of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 6 | ||||||||||
After waiver of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.12 | 7 | 0.07 | 7 | 0.16 | 7 | 0.20 | 6,7 | |||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009 | ||
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. | ||
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. | ||
4 | Amounts represent less than $0.005 per share. | ||
5 | Not annualized. | ||
6 | Annualized. | ||
7 | Amount includes fees waived by the adviser (see Note 3). |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
79
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
BOND FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $10.57 | $10.29 | $10.14 | $9.94 | $10.19 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.50 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 0.21 | (0.21 | ) | |||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.34 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.64 | 0.29 | ||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.36 | ) | (0.41 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.44 | ) | (0.54 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | (0.02 | ) | 0.28 | 0.15 | 0.20 | (0.25 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.55 | $10.57 | $10.29 | $10.14 | $9.94 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 3.21 | 6.73 | 5.92 | 6.50 | 2.86 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $340,335 | $375,325 | $429,499 | $541,789 | $572,562 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.56 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 3.13 | 3.62 | 3.76 | 4.28 | 4.84 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 11 | 6 | 2 | 25 | 12 | ||||||||||
Inception to | |||||||||||||||
CLASS II | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $10.56 | $10.28 | $10.14 | $9.85 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.27 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.01 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 0.28 | |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.32 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.55 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.34 | ) | (0.39 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | (0.02 | ) | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.29 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.54 | $10.56 | $10.28 | $10.14 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 2.96 | 6.47 | 5.66 | 5.55 | 4 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $49,456 | $49,774 | $35,750 | $9,719 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.88 | 3.36 | 3.49 | 3.86 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 11 | 6 | 2 | 25 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009. | |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. | |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. | |
4 | Not annualized. | |
5 | Annualized. | |
6 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
80
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
HIGH INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.18 | $9.42 | $9.11 | $7.34 | $9.54 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.67 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.42 | (0.18 | ) | 0.35 | 1.80 | (2.07 | ) | ||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.03 | 0.47 | 1.07 | 2.48 | (1.40 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.84 | ) | (0.71 | ) | (0.76 | ) | (0.71 | ) | (0.80 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.19 | (0.24 | ) | 0.31 | 1.77 | (2.20 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $9.37 | $9.18 | $9.42 | $9.11 | $7.34 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 11.23 | 5.01 | 11.73 | 34.29 | (14.74 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $60,362 | $86,462 | $95,552 | $107,722 | $90,728 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.76 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 6.31 | 6.76 | 7.54 | 7.94 | 7.42 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 55 | 54 | 53 | 73 | 45 | ||||||||||
Inception | |||||||||||||||
to | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | ||||||||||||
CLASS II | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.19 | $9.42 | $9.11 | $8.14 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.47 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.42 | (0.18 | ) | 0.34 | 0.96 | ||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.04 | 1.43 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.82 | ) | (0.68 | ) | (0.73 | ) | (0.46 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.18 | (0.23 | ) | 0.31 | 0.97 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $9.37 | $9.19 | $9.42 | $9.11 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 10.95 | 4.75 | 11.45 | 17.49 | 4 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $6,737 | $6,213 | $4,286 | $1,148 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 6.02 | 6.52 | 7.20 | 7.65 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 55 | 54 | 53 | 73 | 4 |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
81
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
DIVERSIFIED INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $17.39 | $16.62 | $15.37 | $14.46 | $17.62 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.72 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.92 | 0.79 | 1.29 | 0.92 | (3.05 | ) | |||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.41 | 1.30 | 1.85 | 1.52 | (2.33 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.51 | ) | (0.53 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.61 | ) | (0.81 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.51 | ) | (0.53 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.61 | ) | (0.83 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.90 | 0.77 | 1.25 | 0.91 | (3.16 | ) | |||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $18.29 | $17.39 | $16.62 | $15.37 | $14.46 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 8.16 | 7.84 | 12.04 | 10.74 | (13.25 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $359,022 | $372,852 | $384,709 | $418,381 | $438,047 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.69 | 2.94 | 3.50 | 4.12 | 4.37 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 17 | 19 | 23 | 26 | 14 | ||||||||||
Inception | |||||||||||||||
to | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | ||||||||||||
CLASS II | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $17.37 | $16.61 | $15.37 | $13.74 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.35 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.93 | 0.79 | 1.29 | 1.64 | |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.37 | 1.25 | 1.81 | 1.99 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.48 | ) | (0.49 | ) | (0.57 | ) | (0.36 | ) | |||||||
Net increase in net asset value | 0.89 | 0.76 | 1.24 | 1.63 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $18.26 | $17.37 | $16.61 | $15.37 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 7.89 | 7.57 | 11.77 | 14.43 | 4 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $34,908 | $30,360 | $22,309 | $6,261 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.43 | 2.69 | 3.20 | 3.44 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 17 | 19 | 23 | 26 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009 |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
4 | Not annualized. |
5 | Annualized. |
6 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
82
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
LARGE CAP VALUE FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $24.78 | $23.56 | $22.17 | $19.42 | $31.49 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.65 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2.37 | 1.24 | 1.46 | 2.76 | (11.99 | ) | |||||||||
Total from investment operations | 2.92 | 1.74 | 1.84 | 3.19 | (11.34 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.58 | ) | (0.52 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.44 | ) | (0.71 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.58 | ) | (0.52 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (0.44 | ) | (0.73 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 2.34 | 1.22 | 1.39 | 2.75 | (12.07 | ) | |||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $27.12 | $24.78 | $23.56 | $22.17 | $19.42 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 11.82 | 7.38 | 8.29 | 16.79 | (35.99 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $494,587 | $485,978 | $524,894 | $630,764 | $609,444 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.61 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.05 | 2.03 | 1.72 | 2.23 | 2.42 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 27 | 29 | 63 | 81 | 38 | ||||||||||
Inception | |||||||||||||||
to | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | ||||||||||||
CLASS II | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $24.73 | $23.54 | $22.17 | $17.74 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.18 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2.37 | 1.25 | 1.44 | 4.45 | |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 2.85 | 1.68 | 1.78 | 4.63 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.53 | ) | (0.49 | ) | (0.41 | ) | (0.20 | ) | |||||||
Net increase in net asset value | 2.32 | 1.19 | 1.37 | 4.43 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $27.05 | $24.73 | $23.54 | $22.17 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 11.55 | 7.11 | 8.02 | 26.09 | 4 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $5,882 | $5,697 | $5,354 | $2,552 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 1.80 | 1.78 | 1.51 | 1.28 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 27 | 29 | 63 | 81 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009. |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
4 | Not annualized. |
5 | Annualized. |
6 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
83
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
LARGE CAP GROWTH FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $21.84 | $22.16 | $19.87 | $14.50 | $23.36 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.12 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2.26 | (0.31 | ) | 2.31 | 5.37 | (8.80 | ) | ||||||||
Total from investment operations | 2.44 | (0.26 | ) | 2.41 | 5.49 | (8.68 | ) | ||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.19 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.14 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.04 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.19 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.18 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 2.25 | (0.32 | ) | 2.29 | 5.37 | (8.86 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $24.09 | $21.84 | $22.16 | $19.87 | $14.50 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 11.20 | (1.19 | ) | 12.13 | 37.98 | (37.20 | ) | ||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $318,024 | $331,032 | $374,644 | $433,483 | $352,473 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.82 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 0.76 | 0.24 | 0.51 | 0.72 | 0.62 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover8 (%) | 64 | 85 | 78 | 89 | 123 | ||||||||||
Inception | |||||||||||||||
to | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | ||||||||||||
CLASS II | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $21.80 | $22.14 | $19.87 | $15.78 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.12 | (0.00 | )7 | 0.06 | 0.05 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2.26 | (0.32 | ) | 2.30 | 4.09 | ||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 2.38 | (0.32 | ) | 2.36 | 4.14 | ||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.16 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.09 | ) | (0.05 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 2.22 | (0.34 | ) | 2.27 | 4.09 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $24.02 | $21.80 | $22.14 | $19.87 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 10.93 | (1.43 | ) | 11.85 | 26.21 | 4 | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $29,101 | $27,589 | $20,802 | $6,003 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 0.51 | – | 6 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 5 | |||||||||
Portfolio Turnover8 (%) | 64 | 85 | 78 | 89 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009. |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
4 | Not annualized. |
5 | Annualized. |
6 | Amount represents less than 0.01%. |
7 | Amount represents less than $0.005 per share. |
8 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
84
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
MID CAP FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 20103 | 20093 | 20083 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $14.75 | $14.14 | $11.82 | $8.01 | $15.31 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 5 | 0.00 | 5 | ||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2.34 | 0.62 | 2.33 | 3.81 | (7.13 | ) | |||||||||
Total from investment operations | 2.39 | 0.64 | 2.37 | 3.81 | (7.13 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.05 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.00 | )5 | (0.00 | )5 | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.16 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.05 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.00 | ) | (0.16 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 2.34 | 0.61 | 2.32 | 3.81 | (7.29 | ) | |||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $17.09 | $14.75 | $14.14 | $11.82 | $8.01 | ||||||||||
Total Return4 (%) | 16.24 | 4.47 | 20.12 | 47.28 | (46.89 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $356,534 | $351,833 | $385,219 | $229,395 | $166,465 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.87 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.42 | (0.05 | ) | 0.09 | |||||||||
Portfolio Turnover8 (%) | 25 | 52 | 46 | 186 | 108 | ||||||||||
Inception | |||||||||||||||
to | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 20103 | 12/31/091,3 | ||||||||||||
CLASS II | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $14.72 | $14.13 | $11.82 | $9.36 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.01 | (0.01 | ) | 0.04 | (0.00 | )5 | |||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 2.35 | 0.60 | 2.30 | 2.45 | |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 2.36 | 0.59 | 2.34 | 2.45 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.03 | ) | – | (0.03 | ) | – | |||||||||
Net increase in net asset value | 2.33 | 0.59 | 2.31 | 2.45 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $17.05 | $14.72 | $14.13 | $11.82 | |||||||||||
Total Return4 (%) | 15.95 | 4.22 | 19.82 | 26.13 | 6 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $13,927 | $13,270 | $11,951 | $1,745 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.16 | 1.17 | 1.16 | 1.12 | 7 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 0.05 | (0.07 | ) | 0.38 | (0.14 | )7 | |||||||||
Portfolio Turnover8 (%) | 25 | 52 | 46 | 1866 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009 |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
3 | The financial highlights prior to May 1, 2010 are those of the Mid Cap Growth Fund, the accounting survivor of the reorganization of the Mid Cap Value and Mid Cap Growth Funds. The net asset values and other per share information of the Mid Cap Growth Fund have been restated by the conversion ratio of 2.6623 for Class I shares and 2.6678 for Class II shares to reflect those of the legal survivor of the reorganization, the Mid Cap Value Fund, which was renamed the Mid Cap Fund after the reorganization. |
4 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
5 | Amounts represents less than $0.005 per share. |
6 | Not annualized. |
7 | Annualized. |
8 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
85
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
SMALL CAP FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $10.81 | $10.75 | $8.54 | $6.53 | $8.86 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.08 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1.52 | 0.06 | 2.20 | 2.00 | (2.34 | ) | |||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.66 | 0.10 | 2.28 | 2.05 | (2.26 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.15 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.07 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.00 | )7 | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.15 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.07 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 1.51 | 0.06 | 2.21 | 2.01 | (2.33 | ) | |||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $12.32 | $10.81 | $10.75 | $8.54 | $6.53 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 15.39 | 0.91 | 26.80 | 31.56 | (25.54 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $11,936 | $11,261 | $11,710 | $7,989 | $5,986 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 1.12 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 1.24 | 0.41 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 1.03 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 15 | 22 | 33 | 21 | 28 | ||||||||||
Inception to | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | ||||||||||||
CLASS II | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $10.79 | $10.74 | $8.54 | $6.50 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.02 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1.52 | 0.06 | 2.20 | 2.03 | |||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.63 | 0.08 | 2.26 | 2.05 | |||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.13 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.06 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||||||
Net increase in net asset value | 1.50 | 0.05 | 2.20 | 2.04 | |||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $12.29 | $10.79 | $10.74 | $8.54 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 15.10 | 0.66 | 26.48 | 31.57 | 4 | ||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $1,486 | $1,401 | $1,387 | $616 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.36 | 1.36 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 0.99 | 0.16 | 0.67 | 0.44 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 15 | 22 | 33 | 21 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009. |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
4 | Not annualized. |
5 | Annualized. |
6 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period |
7 | Amount represents less than $0.005 per share. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
86
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
INTERNATIONAL STOCK FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.03 | $9.99 | $9.53 | $7.59 | $13.40 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.26 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1.75 | (0.96 | ) | 0.53 | 1.95 | (5.27 | ) | ||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.92 | (0.77 | ) | 0.67 | 2.12 | (5.01 | ) | ||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.17 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (0.26 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | – | – | – | – | (0.54 | ) | |||||||||
Total distributions | (0.17 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (0.80 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 1.75 | (0.96 | ) | 0.46 | 1.94 | (5.81 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.78 | $9.03 | $9.99 | $9.53 | $7.59 | ||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 21.31 | (7.70 | ) | 7.09 | 27.90 | (38.62 | ) | ||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $76,919 | $72,756 | $92,063 | $77,997 | $72,768 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 1.74 | 1.90 | 1.48 | 2.08 | 2.45 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 42 | 38 | 79 | 87 | 43 | ||||||||||
Inception | |||||||||||||||
to | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 12/31/091 | ||||||||||||
CLASS II | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.02 | $9.99 | $9.53 | $7.32 | |||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.04 | |||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 1.76 | (0.96 | ) | 0.56 | 2.33 | ||||||||||
Total from investment operations | 1.90 | (0.80 | ) | 0.65 | 2.37 | ||||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.16 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.16 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 1.74 | (0.97 | ) | 0.46 | 2.21 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.76 | $9.02 | $9.99 | $9.53 | |||||||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 21.01 | (7.91 | ) | 6.83 | 32.30 | 4 | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $18,263 | $15,407 | $13,241 | $3,962 | |||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets (%) | 1.46 | 1.47 | 1.47 | 1.48 | 5 | ||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 1.45 | 1.58 | 1.00 | 0.57 | 5 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover6 (%) | 42 | 38 | 79 | 87 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations May 1, 2009. |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
4 | Not annualized. |
5 | Annualized. |
6 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
87
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
MADISON TARGET RETIREMENT 2020 FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $7.82 | $8.06 | $7.64 | $6.04 | $9.63 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income1 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.22 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.53 | (0.04 | ) | 0.49 | 1.59 | (3.60 | ) | ||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.69 | 1.74 | (3.38 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.25 | ) | (0.23 | ) | (0.27 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.16 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | (0.03 | ) | (0.19 | ) | – | – | (0.05 | ) | |||||||
Total distributions | (0.28 | ) | (0.42 | ) | (0.27 | ) | (0.14 | ) | (0.21 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.49 | (0.24 | ) | 0.42 | 1.60 | (3.59 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $8.31 | $7.82 | $8.06 | $7.64 | $6.04 | ||||||||||
Total Return2 (%) | 9.98 | 2.11 | 9.01 | 28.93 | (35.31 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $56,607 | $39,580 | $27,648 | $19,300 | $8,719 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets | |||||||||||||||
Before reimbursement of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.40 | ||||||||||
After reimbursement of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.30 | 0.24 | 3 | 0.20 | 3 | 0.34 | 3 | 0.40 | |||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.96 | 2.70 | 2.61 | 2.24 | 2.80 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover4 (%) | 90 | 114 | 51 | 78 | 74 |
1 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
2 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
3 | Amount includes fees waived by the Adviser through a contractual management fee reduction from 0.40% to 0.20% effective October 1, 2009 to February 16, 2011. Effective February 17, 2011 to August 31, 2011, the fee was permanently reduced to 0.20%. Effective September 1, 2011, shareholders approved a new fee arrangement which includes an advisory fee of 0.25% and services agreement fee of 0.05%. |
4 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
88
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
MADISON TARGET RETIREMENT 2030 FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $7.49 | $7.90 | $7.41 | $5.75 | $9.54 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income1 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.18 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.60 | (0.09 | ) | 0.52 | 1.65 | (3.82 | ) | ||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.83 | 0.10 | 0.70 | 1.77 | (3.64 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.22 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.11 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | (0.06 | ) | (0.31 | ) | – | – | (0.04 | ) | |||||||
Total distributions | (0.28 | ) | (0.51 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.11 | ) | (0.15 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.55 | (0.41 | ) | 0.49 | 1.66 | (3.79 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $8.04 | $7.49 | $7.90 | $7.41 | $5.75 | ||||||||||
Total Return2 (%) | 11.05 | 1.16 | 9.56 | 30.94 | (38.35 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $68,009 | $45,404 | $31,279 | $19,330 | $8,010 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets | |||||||||||||||
Before reimbursement of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.40 | ||||||||||
After reimbursement of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.30 | 0.24 | 3 | 0.20 | 3 | 0.34 | 3 | 0.40 | |||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.84 | 2.43 | 2.42 | 1.87 | 2.38 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover4 (%) | 86 | 108 | 43 | 78 | 52 |
1 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
2 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
3 | Amount includes fees waived by the Adviser through a contractual management fee reduction from 0.40% to 0.20% effective October 1, 2009 to February 16, 2011. Effective February 17, 2011 to August 31, 2011, the fee was permanently reduced to 0.20%. Effective September 1, 2011, shareholders approved a new fee arrangement which includes an advisory fee of 0.25% and services agreement fee of 0.05%. |
4 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
89
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
MADISON TARGET RETIREMENT 2040 FUND | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||
CLASS I | |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $7.06 | $7.60 | $7.07 | $5.43 | $9.48 | ||||||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income1 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.14 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.61 | (0.12 | ) | 0.55 | 1.63 | (4.06 | ) | ||||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.81 | 0.04 | 0.70 | 1.71 | (3.92 | ) | |||||||||
Less Distributions: | |||||||||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.19 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.08 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | (0.07 | ) | (0.41 | ) | – | – | (0.05 | ) | |||||||
Total distributions | (0.26 | ) | (0.58 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.13 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.55 | (0.54 | ) | 0.53 | 1.64 | (4.05 | ) | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $7.61 | $7.06 | $7.60 | $7.07 | $5.43 | ||||||||||
Total Return2 (%) | 11.42 | 0.47 | 9.97 | 31.64 | (41.65 | ) | |||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $49,269 | $35,182 | $26,147 | $16,656 | $6,385 | ||||||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets | |||||||||||||||
Before reimbursement of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.40 | ||||||||||
After reimbursement of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.30 | 0.24 | 3 | 0.20 | 3 | 0.34 | 3 | 0.40 | |||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.65 | 2.11 | 2.14 | 1.22 | 1.99 | ||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover4 (%) | 101 | 115 | 40 | 86 | 62 |
1 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
2 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
3 | Amount includes fees waived by the Adviser through a contractual management fee reduction from 0.40% to 0.20% effective October 1, 2009 to February 16, 2011. Effective February 17, 2011 to August 31, 2011, the fee was permanently reduced to 0.20%. Effective September 1, 2011, shareholders approved a new fee arrangement which includes an advisory fee of 0.25% and services agreement fee of 0.05%. |
4 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
90
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Financial Highlights for a Share of Beneficial Interest Outstanding
MADISON TARGET RETIREMENT 2050 FUND | ||||||||
Year Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | Inception to | |||||||
2012 | 12/31/111 | |||||||
CLASS I | ||||||||
Net Asset Value at beginning of period | $9.75 | $10.00 | ||||||
Income from Investment Operations: | ||||||||
Net investment income2 | 0.30 | 0.26 | ||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments | 0.89 | (0.36 | ) | |||||
Total from investment operations | 1.19 | (0.10 | ) | |||||
Less Distributions: | ||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (0.21 | ) | (0.14 | ) | ||||
Distributions from return of capital | – | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Distributions from capital gains | (0.04 | ) | – | |||||
Total distributions | (0.25 | ) | (0.15 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value | 0.94 | (0.25 | ) | |||||
Net Asset Value at end of period | $10.69 | $9.75 | ||||||
Total Return3 (%) | 12.12 | (1.03 | )4 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: | ||||||||
Net Assets at end of period (in 000’s) | $7,160 | $2,236 | ||||||
Ratios of expenses to average net assets | ||||||||
Before reimbursement of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.30 | 0.26 | 5 | |||||
After reimbursement of expenses by Adviser (%) | 0.30 | 0.26 | 5,6 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (%) | 2.90 | 2.61 | 5 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover7 (%) | 86 | 75 | 4 |
1 | Commenced investment operations January 3, 2011. |
2 | Based on average shares outstanding during the year. |
3 | These returns are after all charges at the mutual fund level have been subtracted. These returns are higher than the returns at the separate account level because charges made at the separate account level have not been subtracted. |
4 | Not annualized. |
5 | Annualized. |
6 | Amount includes fees waived by the Adviser through a contractual management fee reduction from 0.40% to 0.20% effective October 1, 2009 to February 16, 2011. Effective February 17, 2011 to August 31, 2011, the fee was permanently reduced to 0.20%. Effective September 1, 2011, shareholders approved a new fee arrangement which includes an advisory fee of 0.25% and services agreement fee of 0.05%. |
7 | Portfolio Turnover is calculated at the fund level and represents the entire fiscal year or period. |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
91
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
1. ORGANIZATION
The Ultra Series Fund (the “Trust”), a Massachusetts business trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), as amended, as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Trust is a series fund with, at the end of the period covered by this report, 16 investment portfolios (individually, a “fund,” and collectively, the “funds”), each with different investment objectives and policies. The funds currently available at the end of the period were the Money Market Fund, Bond Fund, High Income Fund, Diversified Income Fund, Large Cap Value Fund, Large Cap Growth Fund, Mid Cap Fund, Small Cap Fund and International Stock Fund (collectively, the “Core Funds”), the Conservative Allocation Fund, Moderate Allocation Fund and Aggressive Allocation Fund (collectively, the “Target Allocation Funds”), and the Madison Target Retirement 2020 Fund, Madison Target Retirement 2030 Fund, Madison Target Retirement 2040 Fund, and Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund, (collectively, the “Target Date Funds”).
The Declaration of Trust permits the Board of Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of the Trust without par value. All funds, except for the Target Date Funds, offer Class I and II shares. The Target Date Funds only offer a single class of shares, Class I shares. Each class of shares represents an interest in the assets of the respective fund and has identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights, except that each class of shares bears its own distribution fees, if any, and its proportional share of fund level expenses, and has exclusive voting rights on matters pertaining to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act as it relates to that class and other class specific matters. Shares are offered to separate accounts (the “Accounts”) of CMFG Life Insurance Company and to qualified pension and retirement plans of CMFG Life Insurance Company or it’s affiliates (“CUNA Mutual Group”). The Trust may, in the future, offer other share classes to separate accounts of insurance companies and to qualified pension and retirement plans that are not affiliated with CUNA Mutual Group. The Trust does not offer shares directly to the general public.
The Trust has entered into a Management Agreement with Madison Asset Management, LLC. (the “Investment Adviser” or “Madison”). The Investment Adviser, in turn, has entered into subadvisory agreements with certain subadvisers (“Subadvisers”) for the management of the investments of the High Income, Small Cap and International Stock Funds.
2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by each fund in the preparation of its financial statements.
Portfolio Valuation: Equity securities, including American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”) and exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”) listed on any U.S. or foreign stock exchange or quoted on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the last quoted sale price or official closing price on that exchange or NASDAQ on the valuation day (provided that, for securities traded on NASDAQ, the funds utilize the NASDAQ Official Closing Price). If no sale occurs, (a) equities traded on a U.S. exchange or on NASDAQ are valued at the mean between the closing bid and closing asked prices and (b) equity securities traded on a foreign exchange are valued at the official bid price. Debt securities purchased with a remaining maturity of 61 days or more are valued on the basis of last available bid prices or current market quotations provided by dealers or pricing services approved by the Trust. In determining the value of a particular investment, pricing services may use certain information with respect to transactions in such investments, quotations from dealers, pricing matrixes, market transactions in comparable investments, various relationships observed in the market between investments and calculated yield measures based on valuation technology commonly
92
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
employed in the market for such investments. Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities are valued by independent pricing services using models that consider estimated cash flows of each tranche of the security, establish a benchmark yield and develop an estimated tranche specific spread to the benchmark yield based on the unique attributes of the tranche.
Investments in shares of open-end mutual funds, including money market funds, are valued at their daily net asset value (“NAV”) which is calculated as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (usually 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time) on each day on which the New York Stock Exchange is open for business. NAV per share is determined by dividing each fund’s total net assets by the number of shares of such fund outstanding at the time of calculation. Because the assets of each Target Allocation and each Target Date Fund consist primarily of shares of underlying funds, the NAV of each fund is determined based on the NAV’s of the underlying funds. Total net assets are determined by adding the total current value of portfolio securities, cash, receivables, and other assets and subtracting liabilities. Short-term instruments having maturities of 60 days or less and all securities in the Money Market Fund are valued on an amortized cost basis, which approximates market value.
Over-the-counter securities not listed or traded on NASDAQ are valued at the last sale price on the valuation day. If no sale occurs on the valuation day, an over-the-counter security is valued at the mean between the last bid and asked prices. Spot and forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued based on quotations supplied by dealers in such contracts. Overnight repurchase agreements are valued at cost, and term repurchase agreements (i.e., those whose maturity exceeds seven days), swaps, caps, collars and floors, if any, are valued at the average of the closing bids obtained daily from at least one dealer.
Through the end of this reporting period, the value of all assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies was converted into U.S. dollar values using the then-current exchange rate at the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (usually 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time).
All other securities for which either quotations are not readily available, no other sales have occurred, or in the Investment Adviser’s opinion, do not reflect the current market value, are appraised at their fair values as determined in good faith by The Trust’s Pricing Committee (the “Committee”) and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees. When fair value pricing of securities is employed, the prices of securities used by the funds to calculate NAV may differ from market quotations or official closing prices. Because the Target Allocation and Target Date Funds primarily invest in underlying funds, government securities and short-term paper, it is not anticipated that the Investment Adviser will need to fair value any of the investments of these funds. However, an underlying fund may need to fair value one or more of its investments, which may, in turn, require a Target Allocation or Target Date Fund to do the same because of delays in obtaining the underlying Fund’s NAV.
A fund’s investments (or underlying fund) will be valued at fair value, if in the judgment of the Committee an event impacting the value of an investment occurred between the closing time of a security’s primary market or exchange (for example, a foreign exchange or market) and the time the fund’s share price is calculated as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (usually 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time). Significant events may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) significant fluctuations in domestic markets, foreign markets or foreign currencies; (2) occurrences not directly tied to the securities markets such as natural disasters, armed conflicts or significant government actions; and (3) major announcements affecting a single issuer or an entire market or market sector. In responding to a significant event, the Committee would determine the fair value of affected securities considering factors including, but not limited to: fundamental analytical data relating to the investment; the nature and duration of any restrictions on the disposition of the investment; and the forces influencing the market(s) in which the investment is purchased or sold. The Committee may
93
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
rely on an independent fair valuation service to adjust the valuations of foreign equity securities based on specific market-movement parameters established by the Committee and approved by the Trust.
Security Transactions and Investment Income: Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Net realized gains or losses on sales are determined by the identified cost method. Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Dividend income is recorded on ex-dividend date. Amortization and accretion are recorded on the effective yield method.
Expenses: Expenses that are directly related to one fund are charged directly to that fund. Other operating expenses are prorated to the funds on the basis of relative net assets. Class-specific expenses are borne by that class.
Classes: Income and realized and unrealized gains/losses are allocated to the respective classes on the basis of relative net assets.
Repurchase Agreements: Each fund may engage in repurchase agreements. In a repurchase agreement, a security is purchased for a relatively short period (usually not more than 7 days) subject to the obligation to sell it back to the issuer at a fixed time and price plus accrued interest. The funds will enter into repurchase agreements only with member banks of the Federal Reserve System and with “primary dealers” in U.S. Government securities. As of December 31, 2012, none of the funds held open repurchase agreements.
The Trust has established a procedure providing that the securities serving as collateral for each repurchase agreement must be delivered to the Trust’s custodian either physically or in book-entry form and that the collateral must be marked to market daily to ensure that the repurchase agreement is fully collateralized at all times. In the event of bankruptcy or other default by a seller of a repurchase agreement, a fund could experience one of the following: delays in liquidating the underlying securities during the period in which the fund seeks to enforce its rights thereto, possible subnormal levels of income, declines in value of the underlying securities, or lack of access to income during this period and the expense of enforcing its rights.
In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-03 “Reconsideration of Effective Control of Repurchase Agreements”. ASU 2011-03 is an amendment to Topic 860 “Transfers and Servicing”. These amendments simplify the accounting for repurchase agreements by eliminating the requirement that the transferor demonstrate it has adequate collateral to fund substantially all the cost of purchasing replacement assets. As a result, more arrangements could be accounted for as secured borrowings rather than sales. The guidance applies to public and nonpublic companies and is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The funds have adopted this guidance and have determined that the updated standards have no material impact on the funds’ financial statements.
Foreign Currency Transactions: The books and records are maintained in U.S. dollars. Foreign currency denominated transactions (i.e., market value of investment securities, assets and liabilities, purchases and sales of investment securities, and income and expenses) are translated into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange. The funds enter into contracts on the trade date to settle any securities transactions denominated in foreign currencies on behalf of the funds at the spot rate at settlement.
Each fund, except the Money Market Fund, which can only invest in U.S. dollar-denominated foreign money market securities, reports certain foreign currency-related transactions as components of realized gains or losses for financial reporting purposes, whereas such components are treated as ordinary income for federal income tax purposes. Only the
94
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
International Stock Fund had net realized gains, and that amount of $196,482 is included in the Statements of Operations under the heading “Net realized gain (loss) on investments” for that fund.
The Funds do not isolate the portion of gains and losses on investments in securities that is due to changes in the foreign exchange rates from that which is due to changes in market prices of securities. Such amounts are categorized as gain or loss on investments for financial reporting purposes.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts: Each fund, except the Money Market Fund, may purchase and sell forward foreign currency exchange contracts for defensive or hedging purposes. When entering into forward foreign currency exchange contracts, the funds agree to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed-upon price on an agreed future date. These contracts are valued daily. The funds’ net assets reflect unrealized gains or losses on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign currency exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date. The funds realize a gain or a loss at the time the forward foreign currency exchange contracts are settled or closed out with an offsetting contract. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in the Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2012, none of the funds had open forward foreign currency exchange contracts.
If a fund enters into a forward foreign currency exchange contract to buy foreign currency for any purpose, the fund will be required to place cash or other liquid assets in a segregated account with the fund’s custodian in an amount equal to the value of the fund’s total assets committed to the consummation of the forward contract. If the value of the securities in the segregated account declines, additional cash or securities will be placed in the segregated account so that the value of the account will equal the amount of the fund’s commitment with respect to the contract.
Illiquid Securities: Each fund currently limits investments in illiquid securities to 15% of net assets at the time of purchase, except for Money Market which limits the investment in illiquid securities to 5% of net assets. An illiquid security is generally defined as any investment that may be difficult to sell within seven days for the price at which the fund values it. At December 31, 2012, investments in securities of the Bond and Diversified Income Funds include issues that are illiquid. The aggregate values of illiquid securities held by Bond and Diversified Income Funds were $16,177,927 and $9,439,256, respectively, which represent 4.2% and 2.4% of net assets, respectively. Pursuant to guidelines adopted by the Board of Trustees, certain unregistered securities are determined to be liquid and are not included within the percent limitations specified above. Information concerning the illiquid securities held at December 31, 2012, which includes cost and acquisition date, is as follows:
Security | Acquisition Date | Acquisition Cost | ||||||||
Bond Fund | ||||||||||
American Association of Retired Persons | 5/16/02 | $ | 2,620,162 | |||||||
ERAC USA Finance LLC | 12/16/04 | 4,762,254 | ||||||||
Indianapolis Power & Light Co. | 10/2/06 | 3,424,873 | ||||||||
WM Wrigley Jr. Co. | 6/21/10 | 3,169,571 | ||||||||
$ | 13,976,860 | |||||||||
Diversified Income Fund | ||||||||||
AbbVie Inc. | 11/5/12 | $ | 1,193,825 | |||||||
American Association of Retired Persons | 5/16/02 | 2,096,129 | ||||||||
ERAC USA Finance LLC | 12/16/04 | 2,002,311 | ||||||||
Indianapolis Power & Light Co. | 10/2/06 | 1,545,915 | ||||||||
WM Wrigley Jr. Co. | 6/21/10 | 1,309,823 | ||||||||
$ | 8,148,003 |
95
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
Delayed Delivery Securities: Each fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis. “When-issued” refers to securities whose terms are available and for which a market exists, but that have not been issued. For when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, no payment is made until delivery date, which is typically longer than the normal course of settlement, and often a month or more after the purchase. When a fund enters into an agreement to purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis, the fund segregates cash or other liquid securities, of any type or maturity, equal in value to the fund’s commitment. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities, if the counterparty does not perform under the contract, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic or other factors. As of December 31, 2012, none of the funds had entered into such transactions.
Fair Value Measurements: Each fund has adopted the FASB guidance on fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that each fund would receive upon selling an investment in a timely transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market of the investment. A three-tier hierarchy is used to maximize the use of observable market data “inputs” and minimize the use of unobservable “inputs” and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk (for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value including such a pricing model and/or the risk inherent in the inputs used in the valuation technique). Inputs may be observable or unobservable.
Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
• Level 1 – unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
• Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rate volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risk, benchmark yields, transactions, bids, offers, new issues, spreads and other relationships observed in the markets among comparable securities, underlying equity of the issuer; and proprietary pricing models such as yield measures calculated using factors such as cash flows, financial or collateral performance and other reference data, etc.)
• Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The valuation techniques used by the Funds to measure fair value for the period ended December 31, 2012 maximized the use of observable inputs and minimized the use of unobservable inputs. The Funds utilized the following fair value techniques: multidimensional relational pricing model and option adjusted spread pricing; the Funds estimated the price that would have prevailed in a liquid market for an international equity security given information available at the time of evaluation. Through the period ended December 31, 2012, none of the Funds held securities deemed as a Level 3 and there were no transfers between classification levels.
96
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2012 in valuing the funds’ investments carried at fair value (please see the Portfolio of Investments for each Fund for a listing of all securities within each category):
Quoted Prices in | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||||||
Identical Investments | Inputs | Inputs | Value at | |||||||||||||||||
Fund | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | 12/31/12 | ||||||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | 237,954,277 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 237,954,277 | ||||||||||||
Moderate Allocation | 390,295,476 | – | – | 390,295,476 | ||||||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | 144,422,356 | – | – | 144,422,356 | ||||||||||||||||
Money Market1 | 2,476,374 | 47,635,150 | – | 50,111,524 | ||||||||||||||||
Bond | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Backed | – | 3,476,244 | – | 3,476,244 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate Notes and Bonds | – | 107,097,622 | – | 107,097,622 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Backed | – | 63,257,219 | – | 63,257,219 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations | – | 199,523,992 | – | 199,523,992 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Companies | 13,441,891 | – | – | 13,441,891 | ||||||||||||||||
13,441,891 | 373,355,077 | – | 386,796,968 | |||||||||||||||||
High Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Notes and Bonds | – | 63,087,653 | – | 63,087,653 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Companies | 3,135,148 | – | – | 3,135,148 | ||||||||||||||||
3,135,148 | 63,087,653 | – | 66,222,801 | |||||||||||||||||
Diversified Income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | 216,084,799 | – | – | 216,084,799 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset Backed | – | 607,382 | – | 607,382 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate Notes and Bonds | – | 63,221,207 | – | 63,221,207 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Backed | – | 27,066,482 | – | 27,066,482 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations | – | 71,599,662 | – | 71,599,662 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Companies | 14,006,365 | – | – | 14,006,365 | ||||||||||||||||
230,091,164 | 162,494,733 | – | 392,585,897 | |||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | 481,090,989 | – | – | 481,090,989 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Companies | 20,226,182 | – | – | 20,226,182 | ||||||||||||||||
501,317,171 | – | – | 501,317,171 | |||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Growth | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | 330,893,865 | – | – | 330,893,865 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Companies | 15,071,048 | – | – | 15,071,048 | ||||||||||||||||
345,964,913 | – | – | 345,964,913 | |||||||||||||||||
Mid Cap | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | 345,470,438 | – | – | 345,470,438 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Companies | 26,049,776 | – | – | 26,049,776 | ||||||||||||||||
371,520,214 | – | – | 371,520,214 | |||||||||||||||||
Small Cap | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | 13,014,567 | – | – | 13,014,567 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Companies | 496,276 | – | – | 496,276 | ||||||||||||||||
13,510,843 | – | – | 13,510,843 |
1 | At December 31, 2012, all Level 2 securities held are short-term investments. See respective portfolio of investments. |
97
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
Quoted Prices in | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||||||
Identical Investments | Inputs | Inputs | Value at | |||||||||||||||||
Fund | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | 12/31/12 | ||||||||||||||||
International Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||||||||||
Australia | $ | – | $ | 2,357,920 | $ | – | $ | 2,357,920 | ||||||||||||
Belgium | – | 3,298,134 | – | 3,298,134 | ||||||||||||||||
Brazil | – | 1,500,796 | – | 1,500,796 | ||||||||||||||||
Canada | – | 2,646,993 | – | 2,646,993 | ||||||||||||||||
Finland | – | 1,222,154 | – | 1,222,154 | ||||||||||||||||
France | – | 9,291,556 | – | 9,291,556 | ||||||||||||||||
Germany | – | 9,370,001 | – | 9,370,001 | ||||||||||||||||
Indonesia | 782,227 | – | – | 782,227 | ||||||||||||||||
Ireland | 750,732 | – | – | 750,732 | ||||||||||||||||
Italy | – | 2,803,595 | – | 2,803,595 | ||||||||||||||||
Japan | – | 14,585,290 | – | 14,585,290 | ||||||||||||||||
Mexico | – | 856,204 | – | 856,204 | ||||||||||||||||
Netherlands | – | 1,877,635 | – | 1,877,635 | ||||||||||||||||
New Zealand | – | 667,033 | – | 667,033 | ||||||||||||||||
Philippines | – | 535,027 | – | 535,027 | ||||||||||||||||
Russia | – | 1,419,872 | – | 1,419,872 | ||||||||||||||||
South Africa | – | 1,026,517 | – | 1,026,517 | ||||||||||||||||
South Korea | – | 2,412,174 | – | 2,412,174 | ||||||||||||||||
Spain | – | 2,319,723 | – | 2,319,723 | ||||||||||||||||
Sweden | – | 5,131,883 | – | 5,131,883 | ||||||||||||||||
Switzerland | – | 4,330,363 | – | 4,330,363 | ||||||||||||||||
Thailand | – | 996,404 | – | 996,404 | ||||||||||||||||
Turkey | – | 1,559,006 | – | 1,559,006 | ||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | – | 21,881,702 | – | 21,881,702 | ||||||||||||||||
Investment Companies | 1,655,652 | – | – | 1,655,652 | ||||||||||||||||
3,188,611 | 92,089,982 | – | 95,278,593 | |||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2020 | 55,403,024 | – | – | 55,403,024 | ||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2030 | 67,985,121 | – | – | 67,985,121 | ||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2040 | 49,169,125 | – | – | 49,169,125 | ||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2050 | 7,148,181 | – | – | 7,148,181 |
New Accounting Pronouncements: In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, modifying Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” At the same time, the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) issued International Financial Reporting Standard (“IFRS”) 13, “Fair Value Measurement.” The objective by the FASB and IASB is convergence of their guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures. The effective date of the ASU is for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The funds have adopted the disclosures required by this update.
In December 2011, the IASB and the FASB issued ASU 2011-11 “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” These common disclosure requirements are intended to help investors and other financial statement users to better assess the effect or potential effect of offsetting arrangements on a portfolio’s financial position. They also improve transparency in the reporting of how companies mitigate credit risk, including disclosure of related collateral pledged or received. In addition, ASU 2011-11 facilitates comparison between these entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. ASU 2011-11 requires entities to disclose both gross and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the financial position; and disclose
98
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting agreement. ASU 2011-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and interim periods within those annual periods. The funds are currently evaluating the implications of ASU 2011-11 and its impact on financial statements disclosures.
3. MANAGEMENT, SERVICES AND DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS
Management Agreement: For services under the Management Agreement, the Investment Adviser is entitled to receive a management fee, which is calculated daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate based upon the following percentages of average daily net assets: 0.45% for the Money Market Fund, 0.55% for the Bond Fund, 0.75% for the High Income Fund, 0.70% for the Diversified Income Fund, 0.60% for the Large Cap Value Fund, 0.80% for the Large Cap Growth Fund, 0.90% for the Mid Cap Fund, 1.10% for the Small Cap Fund, 1.20% for the International Stock Fund, 0.30% for each of the Target Allocation Funds and 0.25% for each of the Target Date Funds.
The Management Agreement requires the Investment Adviser to provide or arrange to provide overall management of the funds, including but not limited to, investment advisory services, custody, transfer agency, dividend disbursing, legal, accounting and administrative services. It does not include Trustee compensation or the fees paid to the Trust’s independent Registered Public Accountant.
The Investment Adviser is solely responsible for the payment of all fees to the Subadvisers. The Subadvisers for the funds are Shenkman Capital Management, Inc. for the High Income Fund, Wellington Management Company, LLP for the Small Cap Fund and Lazard Asset Management LLC for the International Stock Fund. The Investment Adviser manages the Money Market Fund, Bond Fund, Diversified Income Fund, Large Cap Growth Fund, Large Cap Value Fund, Mid Cap Fund, Target Allocation Funds and the Target Date Funds without the aid of a Subadviser.
The Investment Adviser may from time to time voluntarily agree to waive a portion of its fees or expenses related to the Funds. In that regard, the Investment Adviser waived a portion of management fees on the Money Market Class I Shares and Class II Shares for the purpose of maintaining a one-day yield of zero. The amount of the daily waiver is equal to the amount required to maintain a minimum daily distribution rate of zero. For the period ended December 31, 2012, the waivers totaled $192,101 for Class I Shares and $3,048 for Class II Shares and are reflected as fees waived by the Investment Advisor in the accompanying Statements of Operations. The Investment Adviser does not have the right to recoup these waived fees.
Services Agreement: Effective September 1, 2011, the Investment Adviser entered into a services agreement (“Services Agreement”) for the Target Date Funds. Under the Services Agreement, Madison provides either directly or through outsourced arrangements all operational and support services of the Target Date Funds not provided under the Management Agreement discussed above. Under this Services Agreement, Madison receives a fee of 0.05% (annualized) of the average daily net assets of each Target Date Fund. In exchange for the aforementioned fee, Madison is responsible for paying all of the funds’ fees and expenses, other than (i) the management fee (described above), (ii) fees related to the funds’ portfolio holdings (such as brokerage commissions, interest on loans, etc.), (iii) acquired fund fees, and (iv) extraordinary or non-recurring fees (such as fees and costs relating to any temporary line of credit the funds may maintain for emergency or extraordinary purposes). The direct expenses of the funds’ independent Trustees and independent auditors are paid out of this fee by the funds. Pursuant to the Services Agreement, Madison has also agreed, until April 30, 2013, to waive and/or reimburse investment advisory fees and/or its services fee to the extent necessary to limit each fund’s total operating expenses and underlying fees and expenses to 0.65% of average daily net assets of each Target Date Fund. In applying this waiver, Madison must utilize good faith estimates of the fees and expenses of the underlying funds. The Investment Adviser does not have the right to recoup these waived fees.
99
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
Distribution Agreement: Mosaic Funds Distributor, LLC (“MFD”) serves as distributor of the funds. The Trust adopted a distribution and service plan with respect to the Trust’s Class II shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the plan, the Trust will pay a service fee with regard to Class II shares at an annual rate of 0.25% of each fund’s daily net assets. MFD arranges to provide compensation to others that provide distribution and shareholder servicing services to the funds and their shareholders. Fees incurred by the Funds under the plan are detailed in the Statements of Operations.
The distributor may from time to time voluntarily agree to waive a portion of its fees or expenses related to the funds. In this regard, the distributor waived a portion of 12b-1 fees on the Money Market Class II shares for the purpose of maintaining a one-day yield of zero. For the period ended December 31, 2012, the waivers totaled $2,248 and are reflected as fees waived in the Statements of Operations. Neither MFD nor the Investment Adviser has the right to recoup these waived fees.
MFD changed its name to MFD Distributor, LLC on February 1, 2013, after the date of the period covered by this report.
Other Expenses: In addition to the management fee, the Trust, except for the Target Date Funds effective September 1, 2011, is responsible for fees of the disinterested trustees, brokerage commissions and other expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition or disposition of investments, costs of borrowing money, expenses for independent audits, any potential taxes owed and extraordinary expenses as approved by a majority of Independent Trustees. Effective September 1, 2011, the fees for the disinterested trustees and independent audits are paid out of the Services Agreement fee (noted above) for the Target Date Funds.
Certain officers and trustees of the Trust are also officers of the Investment Adviser. The funds do not compensate their officers or affiliated trustees. Unaffiliated trustees receive from the Trust an attendance fee for each Board or Committee meeting attended, with additional remuneration paid to Audit Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee Chairpersons.
4. DIVIDENDS FROM NET INCOME AND DISTRIBUTIONS OF CAPITAL GAINS
The Money Market Fund declares dividends from net investment income and net realized gains from investment transactions, if any, daily, and net realized gains from investment transactions, if any, annually, which are reinvested in additional full and fractional shares of the fund. The Bond Fund, High Income Fund, Diversified Income Fund, Large Cap Value Fund, Large Cap Growth Fund, Small Cap, Mid Cap Fund, International Stock Fund, Target Allocation Funds, and Target Date Funds declare dividends from net investment income and net realized gains from investment transactions, if any, annually, which are reinvested in additional full and fractional shares of the respective funds.
Income and capital gain distributions, if any, are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Taxable distributions from income and realized capital gains of the funds may differ from book amounts earned during the period due to differences in the timing of capital gains recognition, and due to the reclassification of certain gains or losses from capital to income.
5. SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS
For the period ended December 31, 2012, aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term investments, were as follows:
U.S. Government Securities | Other Investment Securities | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Purchases | Sales | Purchases | Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 102,995,930 | $ | 100,886,745 | ||||||||||||
Moderate Allocation | – | – | 188,655,060 | 197,009,347 | ||||||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | – | – | 96,645,731 | 96,111,705 |
100
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
U.S. Government Securities | Other Investment Securities | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Purchases | Sales | Purchases | Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Bond | $ | 41,368,402 | $ | 53,662,524 | $ | 1,077,073 | $ | 19,886,369 | ||||||||||||
High Income | – | – | 44,855,707 | 73,808,062 | ||||||||||||||||
Diversified Income | 15,888,514 | 17,931,147 | 49,659,557 | 71,058,643 | ||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Value | – | – | 131,804,244 | 170,877,404 | ||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Growth | – | – | 228,393,097 | 282,078,764 | ||||||||||||||||
Mid Cap | – | – | 86,158,002 | 141,818,151 | ||||||||||||||||
Small Cap | – | – | 1,940,987 | 2,640,379 | ||||||||||||||||
International Stock | – | – | 37,706,972 | 45,867,961 | ||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2020 | – | – | 56,517,798 | 42,594,477 | ||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2030 | – | – | 67,570,170 | 48,312,962 | ||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2040 | – | – | 52,972,399 | 41,834,212 | ||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2050 | – | – | 8,296,496 | 3,760,697 |
6. FOREIGN SECURITIES
Each fund may invest in foreign securities; however, the Money Market Fund is limited to U.S. dollar-denominated foreign money market securities. Foreign securities include American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”), Global Depositary Receipts (“GDRs”), Swedish Depositary Receipts (“SDRs”) and foreign money market securities. Dollar-denominated securities that are part of the Merrill Lynch U.S. Domestic Master Index are not considered a foreign security.
Certain funds have reclaim receivable balances, in which the funds are due a reclaim on the taxes that have been paid to some foreign jurisdictions. The values of all reclaims are not significant for any of the Funds and are reflected in Other Assets on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. These receivables are reviewed to ensure the current receivable balance is reflective of the amount deemed to be collectable.
7. SECURITIES LENDING
Each fund, except the Target Allocation, Money Market, Small Cap and Target Retirement Funds, entered into a Securities Lending Agreement (the “Agreement”) with State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”). Under the terms of the Agreement, the funds may lend portfolio securities to qualified borrowers in order to earn additional income. The Agreement requires that loans are collateralized at all times by cash or other liquid assets at least equal to 102% of the value of the securities, which is determined on a daily basis. Amounts earned as interest on investments of cash collateral, net of rebates and fees, if any, are included in the Statements of Operations. The primary risk associated with securities lending is if the borrower defaults on its obligation to return the securities loaned because of insolvency or other reasons, the funds could experience delays and costs in recovering securities loaned or in gaining access to the collateral.
At December 31, 2012, none of the funds had securities out on loan.
8. FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION
It is each fund’s policy to comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all its taxable income to its shareholders. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are recorded in the accompanying financial statements.
The funds have not recorded any liabilities for material unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012. It is the funds’ policy to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax benefits in income taxes, as appropriate. Tax years
101
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
that remain open to examination by major tax jurisdictions include tax years ended December 31, 2009 through December 31, 2012.
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:
Ordinary Income | Long-Term Capital Gain | Return of Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | 8,752,307 | $ | 7,736,541 | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 156,141 | ||||||||||||||||||
Moderate Allocation | 11,631,795 | 10,126,467 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | 3,233,841 | 2,351,251 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money Market | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bond | 12,776,652 | 15,832,299 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
High Income | 5,659,023 | 6,639,622 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diversified Income | 10,709,273 | 11,883,969 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Value | 10,469,073 | 10,205,844 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Growth | 2,704,838 | 893,185 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid Cap | 1,089,948 | 691,290 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small Cap | 154,423 | 49,569 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Stock | 1,486,996 | 1,802,051 | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2020 | 1,701,151 | 1,042,918 | 144,606 | 951,240 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2030 | 2,082,265 | 1,048,477 | 170,986 | 1,807,977 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2040 | 1,497,374 | 746,609 | 103,150 | 1,906,410 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2050 | 146,274 | 31,450 | 14,972 | – | – | 1,099 |
As of December 31, 2012, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Fund | Ordinary Income | Long-Term Capital Gain | Fund | Ordinary Income | Long-Term Capital Gain | |||||||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | – | $ | – | Large Cap Growth | $ | 51,752 | $ | – | |||||||||||||
Moderate Allocation | – | – | Mid Cap | 22,758 | – | |||||||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | – | – | Small Cap | – | – | |||||||||||||||||
Money Market | – | – | International Stock | 42,221 | – | |||||||||||||||||
Bond | 252,849 | – | Madison Target Retirement 2020 | 24,607 | 101,255 | |||||||||||||||||
High Income | 206,043 | – | Madison Target Retirement 2030 | – | 80,762 | |||||||||||||||||
Diversified Income | 215,755 | – | Madison Target Retirement 2040 | 9,458 | 59,115 | |||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Value | 210,348 | – | Madison Target Retirement 2050 | – | 7,405 |
The Regulated Investment Company (“RIC”) Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Modernization Act”) modernized several of the federal income and excise tax provisions related to RICs. The Modernization Act contains simplification provisions which are aimed at preventing disqualification of a RIC for “inadvertent” failures of the asset diversification and/or qualifying income tests. These changes are effective for tax years ending after December 22, 2010. Additionally, the Modernization Act allows capital losses to be carried forward indefinitely, and retain the character of the original loss, exempts RICs from the preferential dividend rule, and repealed the 60-day designation requirement for certain types of pay-through income and gains. These changes are effective for tax years beginning after December 22, 2010. Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for up to eight years and treated as short-term losses. As a transition rule, the Modernization Act requires that post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
For federal income tax purposes, the Funds listed below have capital loss carryovers as of December 31, 2012, which are available to offset future capital gains, if any, realized through the fiscal year listed:
102
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
No Expiration- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Short Term | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | – | $ | 2,386,143 | $ | – | $ | – | |||||||||||||||||||||
Moderate Allocation | – | – | – | 9,202,459 | 20,811,527 | 9,937,108 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | – | – | – | 329,267 | 6,205,447 | 6,513,626 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money Market | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bond | 1,445,891 | 816,322 | 228,563 | – | 9,584,651 | 346,309 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High Income | – | – | – | 3,871,343 | 4,641,635 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diversified Income | – | – | – | – | 24,898,540 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Value | – | – | – | 30,899,868 | 41,852,552 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Growth | – | – | – | – | 11,561,675 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mid Cap | – | – | – | 23,007,112 | 38,369,131 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small Cap | – | – | – | 810,060 | 106,162 | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Stock | – | – | 751,246 | 8,819,661 | 21,825,302 | 1,915,037 | 1,197,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2020 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2030 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2040 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2050 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Included in the net capital loss carryovers for Mid Cap Fund, Small Cap Fund and International Stock Fund is $23,007,112, $810,060 and $9,802,327, respectively, of capital loss carryovers subject to certain limitations upon availability, to offset future gains, if any, as the successor of a merger. These acquired losses are included in the total losses available noted above.
Certain specified losses incurred after October 31 and within the taxable year are deemed to arise on the first day of the funds’ next taxable year, if the funds so elect. For the year ended December 31, 2012, only the International Stock Fund elected to defer late-year ordinary losses of $9,369.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, capital losses utilized for each fund were as follows:
Fund | Amount Utilized | Fund | Amount Utilized | |||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | 3,557,105 | Large Cap Growth | $ | 5,477,866 | |||||||
Moderate Allocation | 7,141,391 | Mid Cap | 11,125,063 | |||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | 3,663,456 | Small Cap | 512,761 | |||||||||
Money Market | – | International Stock | 1,221,270 | |||||||||
Bond | 383,120 | Madison Target Retirement 2020 | – | |||||||||
High Income | 2,842,301 | Madison Target Retirement 2030 | – | |||||||||
Diversified Income | 6,859,551 | Madison Target Retirement 2040 | – | |||||||||
Large Cap Value | 22,472,298 | Madison Target Retirement 2050 | 5,446 |
The Bond Fund had a capital loss carryover expire unused in the current year in the amount of $73,579.
At December 31, 2012, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation/depreciation and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for all securities as computed on a federal income tax basis for each fund were as follows:
Fund | Appreciation | Depreciation | Net | ||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | 13,643,579 | $ | 74,354 | $ | 13,569,225 | |||||||||
Moderate Allocation | 35,591,405 | 773,372 | 34,818,033 | ||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | 15,037,562 | 334,399 | 14,703,163 | ||||||||||||
Bond | 36,427,229 | 3,180,782 | 33,246,447 | ||||||||||||
High Income | 3,151,494 | 47,710 | 3,103,784 |
103
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
Fund | Appreciation | Depreciation | Net | ||||||||||||
Diversified Income | $ | 57,528,149 | $ | 2,831,292 | $ | 54,696,857 | |||||||||
Large Cap Value | 87,081,732 | 5,596,691 | 81,485,041 | ||||||||||||
Large Cap Growth | 75,394,278 | 5,787,230 | 69,607,048 | ||||||||||||
Mid Cap | 83,394,951 | 1,215,416 | 82,179,535 | ||||||||||||
Small Cap | 3,388,162 | 201,746 | 3,186,416 | ||||||||||||
International Stock | 18,456,433 | 625,755 | 17,830,678 | ||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2020 | 2,087,072 | 89,871 | 1,997,201 | ||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2030 | 2,770,800 | 81,637 | 2,689,163 | ||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2040 | 2,100,822 | 81,265 | 2,019,557 | ||||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2050 | 251,778 | 7,941 | 243,837 |
The differences between cost amounts for book purposes and tax purposes are primarily due to the tax deferral of losses.
Reclassification Adjustments: Paid-in capital, undistributed net investment income, and accumulated net realized gain (loss) have been adjusted in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities for permanent book-tax differences for all funds.
Differences primarily relate to the tax treatment of net operating losses, paydown gains and losses, foreign currency gains and losses, and distributions from real estate investment trusts and passive foreign investment companies.
To the extent these book and tax differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified at the end of the fiscal year among paid-in capital in excess of par value, undistributed net investment income (loss) and undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translations. Accordingly, at December 31, 2012 reclassifications were recorded as follows:
Undistributed Net | Accumulated Net | ||||||||||||||
Fund | Paid-in Capital | Investment Income (Loss) | Realized Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | (237,932 | ) | $ | 2,347,684 | $ | (2,109,752 | ) | |||||||
Moderate Allocation | (219,174 | ) | 2,607,131 | (2,387,957 | ) | ||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | (94,454 | ) | 696,008 | (601,554 | ) | ||||||||||
Money Market | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
Bond | (73,579 | ) | (127,319 | ) | 200,898 | ||||||||||
High Income | – | 267,273 | (267,273 | ) | |||||||||||
Diversified Income | – | (39,940 | ) | 39,940 | |||||||||||
Large Cap Value | – | 431 | (431 | ) | |||||||||||
Large Cap Growth | – | (28 | ) | 28 | |||||||||||
Mid Cap | – | – | – | ||||||||||||
Small Cap | (9,333 | ) | (2,999 | ) | 12,332 | ||||||||||
International Stock | – | (50,998 | ) | 50,998 | |||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2020 | – | 232,716 | (232,716 | ) | |||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2030 | – | 193,125 | (193,125 | ) | |||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2040 | – | 87,796 | (87,796 | ) | |||||||||||
Madison Target Retirement 2050 | – | 5,593 | (5,593 | ) |
9. CONCENTRATION OF RISK
Investing in certain financial instruments, including forward foreign currency contracts and futures contracts, involves certain risks. Risks associated with these instruments include potential for an illiquid secondary market for the instruments or inability of counterparties to perform under the terms of the contracts, changes in the value of foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar and financial statement volatility resulting from an imperfect correlation between the movements in the prices of
104
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
the instruments and the prices of the underlying securities and interest rates being hedged. The International Stock Fund may enter into these contracts primarily to protect these funds from adverse currency movements.
Investing in foreign securities involves certain risks not necessarily found in U.S. markets. These include, but are not limited to, risks associated with adverse changes in economic, political, regulatory and other conditions, changes in currency exchange rates, exchange control regulations, expropriation of assets or nationalization, imposition of withholding taxes on dividend or interest payments or capital gains, and possible difficulty in obtaining and enforcing judgments against foreign entities. Further, issuers of foreign securities are subject to different, and often less comprehensive, accounting, reporting and disclosure requirements than domestic issuers.
The High Income Fund invests in securities offering high current income which generally will include bonds in the below investment grade categories of recognized ratings agencies (so-called “junk bonds”). These securities generally involve more credit risk than securities in the higher rating categories. In addition, the trading market for high yield securities may be relatively less liquid than the market for higher-rated securities. The High Income Fund generally invests at least 80% of its assets in high yield securities.
The Target Allocation Funds and Target Date Funds are fund of funds, meaning that they invest primarily in the shares of other registered investment companies (the “underlying funds”), including exchange traded funds (“ETFs”). Thus, each fund’s investment performance and its ability to achieve its investment goal are directly related to the performance of the underlying funds in which it invests; and the underlying fund’s performance, in turn, depends on the particular securities in which that underlying fund invests and the expenses of that fund. Accordingly, these funds are subject to the risks of the underlying funds in direct proportion to the allocation of their respective assets among the underlying funds.
Additionally, the Target Allocation Funds and Target Date Funds are subject to asset allocation risk and manager risk. Manager risk (i.e., fund selection risk) is the risk that the fund(s) selected to fulfill a particular asset class underperforms its peers. Asset allocation risk is the risk that the allocation of the fund’s assets among the various asset classes and market segments will cause the fund to underperform other funds with a similar investment objective.
While investments in stocks and bonds have been keystones in wealth building and management, at times these investments have produced surprises. Those who enjoyed growth and income of their investments generally were rewarded for the risks they took by investing in the markets. Although the Investment Adviser seeks to appropriately address and manage the risks identified and disclosed to you in connection with the management of the securities in the funds, you should understand that the very nature of the securities markets includes the possibility that there may be additional risks of which we are not aware. We certainly seek to identify all applicable risks and then appropriately address the, take appropriate action to reasonably manage them and, of course, to make you aware of them so you can determine if they exceed your risk tolerance. Nevertheless, the often volatile nature of the securities markets and the global economy in which we work suggests that the risk of the unknown is something to consider in connection with an investment in securities. Unforeseen events could under certain circumstances produce a material loss of the value of some or all of the securities we manage for you in the funds.
105
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
10. CAPITAL SHARES AND AFFILIATED OWNERSHIP
All capital shares outstanding at December 31, 2012, are owned by separate investment accounts and/or pension plans of CMFG Life Insurance Company.
The Target Allocation Funds invest in underlying funds, of which certain underlying funds (the “affiliated underlying funds”), may be deemed to be under common control because of the same Board of Trustees. The MEMBERS Mutual Funds audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012 are available at no cost on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov, by calling 1-202-551-8090 or by visiting the MEMBERS Mutual Funds’ website at www.membersfunds.com. The Madison Mosaic audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 are also available at www.sec.gov, by calling 1-800-368-3195 or visiting www.mosaicfunds.com. A summary of the transactions with each affiliated underlying fund as of December 31, 2012 follows:
Balance of | Balance of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Shares | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held at | Gross | Gross | Held at | Value at | Realized | Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund/Underlying Fund | 12/31/11 | Additions | Sales | 12/31/12 | 12/31/12 | Gain (Loss) | Received1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation Fund | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Investment Grade Corporate Bond Fund | 1,205,357 | 72,578 | – | 1,277,935 | $ | 14,913,498 | $ | – | $ | 301,664 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Mosaic Disciplined Equity Fund | 881,454 | 219,625 | 120,196 | 980,883 | 13,124,209 | 174,024 | 835,359 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Mosaic Institutional Bond Fund | 1,756,767 | – | 115,146 | 1,641,621 | 18,402,574 | 36,964 | 283,171 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Bond Fund Class Y | 3,695,022 | 4,516 | 1,795,295 | 1,904,243 | 20,127,845 | 1,424,739 | 762,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Equity Income Fund Class Y | 1,388,402 | 103,330 | 532,960 | 958,772 | 9,271,324 | (182,640 | ) | 1,085,560 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS High Income Fund Class Y | 2,807,172 | – | 1,070,120 | 1,737,052 | 12,350,442 | 331,284 | 1,114,963 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS International Stock Fund Class Y | 423,641 | 171,022 | 2,103 | 592,560 | 6,695,928 | 1,304 | 89,391 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Large Cap Growth Fund Class Y | 439,308 | 198,887 | 230,684 | 407,511 | 7,098,844 | 1,056,278 | 44,554 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Large Cap Value Fund Class Y | 1,003,905 | 280,051 | 207,558 | 1,076,398 | 14,843,529 | 423,284 | 254,234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 116,828,193 | $ | 3,265,237 | $ | 4,771,771 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moderate Allocation Fund | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Mosaic Disciplined Equity Fund | 2,379,388 | – | 159,199 | 2,220,189 | $ | 29,706,124 | $ | 341,252 | $ | 1,890,802 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Mosaic Institutional Bond Fund | 1,538,367 | 44,924 | 189,541 | 1,393,750 | 15,623,934 | 73,568 | 250,324 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Bond Fund Class Y | 3,954,926 | 29,811 | 1,579,121 | 2,405,616 | 25,427,362 | 1,011,824 | 951,296 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Equity Income Fund Class Y | 1,523,183 | 28,930 | 232,779 | 1,319,334 | 12,757,964 | (46,007 | ) | 1,296,471 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS High Income Fund Class Y | 4,596,563 | 72,464 | 2,213,150 | 2,455,877 | 17,461,282 | 403,253 | 1,803,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS International Stock Fund Class Y | 1,961,026 | 58,771 | 1,311,334 | 708,463 | 8,005,628 | 835,422 | 106,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Large Cap Growth Fund Class Y | 1,726,326 | 43,205 | 255,663 | 1,513,868 | 26,371,588 | 556,080 | 169,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Large Cap Value Fund Class Y | 2,645,715 | 102,076 | 390,985 | 2,356,806 | 32,500,352 | (286,017 | ) | 556,653 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Mid Cap Fund Class Y2 | 1,421,439 | 861,972 | 20,132 | 2,263,279 | 17,812,004 | 15,054 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Small Cap Fund Class Y | 794,942 | – | 175,232 | 619,710 | 7,244,407 | 593,237 | 414,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NorthRoad International Fund Class Y | – | 1,378,003 | – | 1,378,003 | 14,317,452 | – | 230,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 207,228,097 | $ | 3,497,666 | $ | 7,671,248 |
1 | Distributions received include distributions from net investment income and from capital gains from the underlying funds. |
2 | Non-income producing. |
106
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
Balance of | Balance of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Shares | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held at | Gross | Gross | Held at | Value at | Realized | Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund/Underlying Fund | 12/31/11 | Additions | Sales | 12/31/12 | 12/31/12 | Gain (Loss) | Received1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation Fund | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Mosaic Disciplined Equity Fund | 1,318,039 | 29,040 | 110,774 | 1,236,305 | $ | 16,541,758 | $ | 185,548 | $ | 1,052,886 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Equity Income Fund Class Y | 301,130 | 109,648 | 76,915 | 333,863 | 3,228,452 | (11,284 | ) | 331,850 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS High Income Fund Class Y | 1,549,510 | 49,557 | 1,169,504 | 429,563 | 3,054,190 | 887,846 | 520,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS International Stock Fund Class Y | 797,169 | 68,662 | 544,526 | 321,305 | 3,630,741 | 563,445 | 48,470 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Large Cap Growth Fund Class Y | 821,449 | 99,782 | 302,568 | 618,663 | 10,777,117 | 919,764 | 69,536 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Large Cap Value Fund Class Y | 1,238,799 | 45,113 | 103,068 | 1,180,844 | 16,283,838 | (33,165 | ) | 278,903 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Mid Cap Fund Class Y2 | 903,562 | 646,128 | 4,885 | 1,544,805 | 12,157,615 | 6,069 | – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBERS Small Cap Fund Class Y | 374,420 | – | 118,835 | 255,585 | 2,987,791 | 355,307 | 170,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NorthRoad International Fund Class Y | – | 595,750 | 103,118 | 492,632 | 5,118,451 | 17,821 | 82,409 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Totals | $ | 73,779,953 | $ | 2,891,351 | $ | 2,555,867 |
1 | Distributions received include distributions from net investment income and from capital gains from the underlying funds. | |
2 | Non-income producing. | |
11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated the impact of all subsequent events on the funds through the date the financial statements were available for issue.
The Trust is aware of litigation relating to attempts by certain fixed income security-holders of Lyondell Chemical company (LYO) to retrieve proceeds from the sale by equity security-holders of LYO shares occurring pursuant to its acquisition by merger in December 2007. The Midcap Fund received proceeds of approximately $1,574,400 from the sale of its LYO equity securities in December 2007. The Trust has not been named as a defendant in this litigation as of the date of this report.
No other events have taken place that meet the definition of a subsequent event that require adjustment to, or disclosure in the financial statements.
107
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of Ultra Series Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of Ultra Series Fund, comprising the Conservative Allocation Fund, Moderate Allocation Fund, Aggressive Allocation Fund, Money Market Fund, Bond Fund, High Income Fund, Diversified Income Fund, Large Cap Value Fund, Large Cap Growth Fund, Mid Cap Fund, Small Cap Fund, International Stock Fund, Madison Target Retirement 2020 Fund, Madison Target Retirement 2030 Fund, Madison Target Retirement 2040 Fund, and Madison Target Retirement 2050 Fund (collectively, the “Funds”) as of December 31, 2012, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, and the statements of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2012, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the Funds as of December 31, 2012, the results of their operations for the year then ended, and the changes in their net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Milwaukee, WI
February 21, 2013
108
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Other Information (unaudited)
BOARD APPROVAL OF ADVISORY AND SUBADVISORY CONTRACTS
The Board reviewed a variety of matters in connection with the Trust’s investment advisory contract with the Adviser and applicable subadvisers. The following description of the Board’s considerations summarizes the process:
With regard to the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided by the Adviser and each subadviser, the Board reviewed the biographies and tenure of the personnel involved in Trust management and the experience of the Adviser (and applicable subadviser) and its affiliates as investment manager to other investment companies with similar investment strategies or to individual clients or institutions with similar investment strategies. They recognized the wide array of investment professionals employed by the respective firm or firms. Representatives of the Adviser and each subadviser discussed their firms’ ongoing investment philosophies and strategies intended to provide performance consistent with each Trust portfolio’s investment objectives under various market scenarios. The Trustees also noted their familiarity with the Adviser and its affiliates due to the Adviser’s history of providing advisory services to its proprietary investment company clients.
The Board also discussed the quality of services provided to the Trust portfolio by its transfer agent, fund administrator and custodian as well as the various administrative services provided directly by the Adviser. Such services included arranging for third party service providers to provide all necessary administration as well as supervising any subadvisers to Trust portfolios.
With regard to the investment performance of the Trusts and the investment adviser, the Board reviewed current performance information provided in the written Board materials. They discussed the reasons for both outperformance and underperformance compared with peer groups and applicable indices and benchmarks. They reviewed both long-term and short-term performance and considered the effect on long-term performance that may have been attributable to any previous investment advisers to any Trust portfolio. They also considered whether any relative underperformance was appropriate to the Adviser’s conservative investment philosophy. The Board performed this review in connection with the Adviser and each subadviser that manages a subadvised Fund portfolio.
A comprehensive discussion of performance and market conditions occurred during the course of the Board’s review. Representatives of the Adviser and each subadviser discussed with the Board the methodology for arriving at peer groups and indices used for performance comparisons.
With regard to the costs of the services to be provided and the profits to be realized by the investment adviser and its affiliates from the relationship with the Trust, the Board reviewed the expense ratios for a variety of other funds in each Trust portfolio’s peer group with similar investment objectives. Again, the Board reviewed these matters in connection with the Adviser and each subadviser that manages a subadvised Trust portfolio.
The Board noted that the Adviser or its affiliates, and, as applicable, each subaviser, provided investment management services to other investment company and/or non-investment company clients and considered the fees charged by the Adviser (and respective subadviser) to such portfolios and clients for purposes of determining whether the given advisory fee was disproportionately large under the so-called Gartenberg standard traditionally used by investment company boards in connection with contract renewal considerations. The Board took those fees into account and considered the differences in services and time required by the various types of funds and clients to which the Adviser (or subadviser, if applicable) provided services. The Board recognized that significant differences may exist between the services provided to one type of fund or client and those provided to others, such as those resulting from a greater frequency of shareholder redemptions in a mutual fund and the higher turnover of mutual fund assets. The Board gave such comparisons the weight that they merit in light of the similarities and differences between the services that the various portfolios require and were wary of “inapt
109
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Other Information (unaudited)
comparisons.” They considered that, if the services rendered by the Adviser (or subadviser, if applicable) to one type of fund or client differed significantly from others, then the comparison should not be used. In the case of non-investment company clients for which the Adviser (or subadviser, if applicable) may act as either investment adviser or subadviser, the Board noted that the fee may be lower than the fee charged to the Trust. The Board noted too the various administrative, operational, compliance, legal and corporate communication services required to be handled by the Adviser (or subadviser, if applicable) which are performed for investment company clients but are not performed for other institutional clients.
The Trustees reviewed each portfolio’s fee structure based on total fund expense ratio as well as by comparing fund advisory fees to other fund advisory fees. The Board noted the simple expense structure maintained by the Trust: (1) an advisory fee and a capped administrative “services” expense for the Target Retirement Date Funds; and (2) for the remaining series of Trust, a unitary fee with limited independent expenses for Trustee compensation and audit fees not covered by the unitary fee. The Board noted the total expense ratios paid by other funds with similar investment objectives, recognizing that such a comparison, while not dispositive, was an important consideration.
The Trustees sought to ensure that fees paid by the Trust were appropriate. The Board reviewed materials demonstrating that although the Adviser is compensated for a variety of the administrative services it provides or arranges to provide to the Target Retirement Date Funds of the Trust pursuant to its administrative services agreements with each of these series, such compensation does not always cover all costs due to the cap on administrative expenses. Administrative, operational, legal and compliance fees and costs in excess of the Services Agreement fees, in the case of the Target Retirement Date series of the Trust, or in excess of the unitary fee, in the case of the remaining series of the Trust, are paid by the Adviser from the investment advisory fees earned. In this regard, the Trustees noted that examination of each Trust portfolio’s total expense ratio compared to those of other investment companies was more meaningful than a simple comparison of basic “investment management only” fee schedules.
The Board recognized that to the extent a Trust portfolio invests in other mutual funds also managed by the Adviser (or its affiliates), the Adviser (or an affiliate) receives investment advisory fees from both the Trust portfolio and the underlying mutual fund. The Board was satisfied in this regard that the Adviser (or an affiliate) provides separate services to each respective Trust’s “fund of funds” portfolios and the underlying mutual funds in which each such portfolio invests in exchange for the fees received from them.
In reviewing costs and profits, the Board noted that for some smaller portfolios or Trust, the salaries of all portfolio management personnel, trading desk personnel, corporate accounting personnel and employees of the Adviser who serve as Trust officers, as well as facility costs (rent), could not be supported by fees received from such portfolios alone. However, the Board recognized that the Trust is profitable to the Adviser because such salaries and fixed costs are already paid in whole or in part from revenue generated by management of other client assets managed by the Adviser. The Trustees noted that total assets managed by the Adviser and its affiliates approximated $16 billion at the time of the meeting. As a result, although the fees paid by each Trust portfolio at its present size might not be sufficient to profitably support a stand-alone fund, each Trust portfolio is reasonably profitable to the Adviser as part of its larger, diversified organization. In sum, the Trustees recognized that each Trust portfolio is important to the Adviser and is managed with the attention given to the Adviser’s other clients.
With regard to the extent to which economies of scale would be realized as each Trust portfolio grows, the Trustees recognized that at their current sizes, it was premature to discuss any economies of scale not already factored into existing advisory and services agreements. In addition, the Trustees recognized that the Adviser was currently waiving fees with regard to the Money Market Fund portfolio of the Trust.
110
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Other Information (unaudited)
During the course of the review, counsel to the Independent Trustees confirmed that the Trust’s Independent Trustees met previously in executive session and reviewed the written contract renewal materials provided by the Adviser. He noted that the Independent Trustees had considered such materials in light of the aforementioned Gartenberg standards as well as criteria either set forth or discussed in the recent Supreme Court decision in Jones v. Harris regarding the investment company contract renewal process under Section 15(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Independent Trustees made a variety of additional inquiries regarding such written materials to the Adviser and the subadvisers and representatives of the Adviser and subadvisers, respectively, discussed each matter raised.
After further discussion, analysis and review of the totality of the information presented, including the information set forth above and the other information considered by the Board of Trustees, the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees, concluded that the respective Trusts’ advisory fees (including applicable subadvisory fees) are fair and reasonable for each respective portfolio and that renewal of their respective Advisory, Subadvisory and Services Agreements are in the best interests of each respective Trust portfolio and its shareholders.
In the course of their review of the contract renewal materials, the Board also reviewed and discussed with counsel the “Rule 12b-1” plans adopted by certain of the Trust’s portfolios. The Board directed its attention to written materials regarding these matters during the course of the Board’s consideration of the Rule 12b-1 plans. Finally, the Board also reviewed the Trust’s distribution agreements and the information provided in the written materials regarding the distributor as well as applicable Codes of Ethics.
Based on the above, the Board renewed the Trust’s contracts for another year.
FUND EXPENSES PAID BY SHAREHOLDERS
As a shareholder of the funds, you pay no transaction costs, but do incur ongoing costs which include management fees; disinterested trustee fees; brokerage commissions and other expenses incurred in connection with the acquisition or disposition of investments; costs of borrowing money; expenses for independent audits, taxes, and extraordinary expenses as approved by a majority of the disinterested trustees. The examples in the table that follows are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples below are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire six month period ended December 31, 2012. Expenses paid during the period in the table below are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half fiscal year period).
Actual Expenses
The table below provides information about actual account values using actual expenses and actual returns for the Funds. You may use the information in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table for the fund you own under the heading entitled “Actual” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
111
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Other Information (unaudited)
CLASS I | CLASS II | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Ending | Annual | Paid | Ending | Annual | Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Account | Account | Expense | During | Account | Expense | During | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Value | Value | Ratio | Period | Value | Ratio | Period | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,048.00 | 0.31 | % | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1,046.70 | 0.56 | % | $ | 2.88 | ||||||||||||||
Moderate Allocation | 1,000 | 1,055.40 | 0.31 | % | 1.60 | 1,054.00 | 0.56 | % | 2.89 | |||||||||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | 1,000 | 1,063.80 | 0.31 | % | 1.61 | 1,062.40 | 0.56 | % | 2.90 | |||||||||||||||||||
Money Market | 1,000 | 1,000.00 | 0.14 | % | 0.70 | 1,000.00 | 0.14 | % | 0.70 | |||||||||||||||||||
Bond | 1,000 | 1,013.80 | 0.57 | % | 2.89 | 1,012.50 | 0.81 | % | 4.10 | |||||||||||||||||||
High Income | 1,000 | 1,055.40 | 0.77 | % | 3.98 | 1,054.10 | 1.02 | % | 5.27 | |||||||||||||||||||
Diversified Income | 1,000 | 1,032.70 | 0.71 | % | 3.63 | 1,031.40 | 0.96 | % | 4.90 | |||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Value | 1,000 | 1,043.70 | 0.61 | % | 3.13 | 1,042.40 | 0.86 | % | 4.42 | |||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Growth | 1,000 | 1,042.00 | 0.81 | % | 4.16 | 1,040.70 | 1.06 | % | 5.44 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mid Cap | 1,000 | 1,078.50 | 0.91 | % | 4.75 | 1,077.10 | 1.16 | % | 6.06 | |||||||||||||||||||
Small Cap | 1,000 | 1,082.90 | 1.11 | % | 5.81 | 1,081.50 | 1.36 | % | 7.12 | |||||||||||||||||||
International Stock | 1,000 | 1,145.80 | 1.21 | % | 6.53 | 1,144,40 | 1.46 | % | 7.87 | |||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement 2020 | 1,000 | 1,053.80 | 0.30 | % | 1.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement 2030 | 1,000 | 1,060.70 | 0.30 | % | 1.55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement 2040 | 1,000 | 1,062.10 | 0.30 | % | 1.56 | �� | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement 2050 | 1,000 | 1,066.50 | 0.30 | % | 1.56 |
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The table also provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the funds’ actual expense ratios and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which are not the funds’ actual returns. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the funds and other funds. To do so, compare the 5% hypothetical example of the funds you own with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other similar funds.
CLASS I | CLASS II | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Ending | Annual | Paid | Ending | Annual | Paid | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Account | Account | Expense | During | Account | Expense | During | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Value | Value | Ratio | Period | Value | Ratio | Period | |||||||||||||||||||||
Conservative Allocation | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,023.58 | 0.31 | % | $ | 1.58 | $ | 1,022.32 | 0.56 | % | $ | 2.85 | ||||||||||||||
Moderate Allocation | 1,000 | 1,023.58 | 0.31 | % | 1.58 | 1,022.32 | 0.56 | % | 2.85 | |||||||||||||||||||
Aggressive Allocation | 1,000 | 1,023.58 | 0.31 | % | 1.58 | 1,022.32 | 0.56 | % | 2.85 | |||||||||||||||||||
Money Market | 1,000 | 1,024.43 | 0.14 | % | 0.71 | 1,024.43 | 0.14 | % | 0.71 | |||||||||||||||||||
Bond | 1,000 | 1,022.27 | 0.57 | % | 2.90 | 1,021.06 | 0.81 | % | 4.12 | |||||||||||||||||||
High Income | 1,000 | 1,021.27 | 0.77 | % | 3.91 | 1,020.01 | 1.02 | % | 5.18 | |||||||||||||||||||
Diversified Income | 1,000 | 1,021.57 | 0.71 | % | 3.61 | 1,020.31 | 0.96 | % | 4.88 | |||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Value | 1,000 | 1,022.07 | 0.61 | % | 3.10 | 1,020.81 | 0.86 | % | 4.37 | |||||||||||||||||||
Large Cap Growth | 1,000 | 1,021.06 | 0.81 | % | 4.12 | 1,019.81 | 1.06 | % | 5.38 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mid Cap | 1,000 | 1,020.56 | 0.91 | % | 4.62 | 1,019.30 | 1.16 | % | 5.89 | |||||||||||||||||||
Small Cap | 1,000 | 1,019.56 | 1.11 | % | 5.63 | 1,018.30 | 1.36 | % | 6.90 | |||||||||||||||||||
International Stock | 1,000 | 1,019.05 | 1.21 | % | 6.14 | 1,017.80 | 1.46 | % | 7.41 | |||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement 2020 | 1,000 | 1,023.63 | 0.30 | % | 1.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement 2030 | 1,000 | 1,023.63 | 0.30 | % | 1.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement 2040 | 1,000 | 1,023.63 | 0.30 | % | 1.53 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Madison Target | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement 2050 | 1,000 | 1,047.00 | 0.30 | % | 3.07 |
112
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Other Information (unaudited)
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any separate account fees, charges, or expenses imposed by the variable annuity or variable life insurance contracts, or retirement and pension plans that use the funds. The information provided in the hypothetical example table is useful in comparing ongoing fund costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these fees, charges or expenses were included, your costs would have been higher.
AVAILABILITY OF QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO SCHEDULES
The Trust files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Form N-Q is available to shareholders at no cost on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. More information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-202-551-8090. Form N-Q and other information about the Trust are available on the EDGAR database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. Copies of this information may also be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following email address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, Washington, DC 20549-0102.
PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND RECORDS
A description of the policies and procedures used by the Trust to vote proxies related to portfolio securities is available to shareholders at no cost on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and is also located in the funds’ Statement of Additional Information. The proxy voting records for the Trust for the most recent twelve-month period ended December 31 are available to shareholders at no cost on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE
One of our most important responsibilities as investment company managers is to communicate with shareholders in an open and direct manner. Some of our comments in our letters to shareholders are based on current management expectations and are considered “forward-looking statements.” Actual future results, however, may prove to be different from our expectations. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as “estimate,””may,””will,””expect,””believe,””plan” and other similar terms. We cannot promise future returns. Our opinions are a reflection of our best judgment at the time this report is compiled, and we disclaim any obligation to update or after forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
TAX INFORMATION
Foreign Tax Credits: The International Stock Fund expects to make an election under Internal Revenue Code Section 853 to pass through foreign taxes paid by the Fund to its shareholders. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the total amount of foreign taxes that is expected to pass through to shareholders and foreign source income for information reporting purposes will be $187,951 (all of which represents taxes withheld) and $2,950,833, respectively.
Corporate Dividends Received Deduction: Of the dividends paid by the Conservative Allocation, Moderate Allocation, Aggressive Allocation, Diversified Income, Large Cap Value, Large Cap Growth, Mid Cap, Small Cap, Madison Target Retirement 2020, Madison Target Retirement 2030, Madison Target Retirement 2040, and Madison Target Retirement 2050 Funds, 7.16%, 11.48%, 19.76%, 59.76%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 11.94%, 16.14%, 19.34%, 27.07%, respectively, qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction.
113
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Ultra Series Fund’s Trustees and Officers
The address of each trustee and officer of the Trust is 550 Science Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, except for Mr. Mason for which it is 8777 N. Gainey Center Drive, #220, Scottsdale, Arizona 85258. The Statement of Additional Information, which includes additional information about the trustees and officers, is available at no cost on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or by calling CMFG Life Insurance Company at 1-800-798-5500.
Interested Trustees and Officers | |||||||
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships | ||||
Katherine L. Frank1 1960 | Trustee and President, 2009 - Present | Madison Investment Holdings, Inc. (“MIH”) (affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; Managing Director and Vice President, 1986 - 2010 Madison Asset Management, LLC (“Madison”), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; Vice President, 2004 - 2010 Madison Investment Advisors, LLC (“MIA”) (affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Executive Director and Chief Operating Officer, 2010 - Present; President, 1996 - 2010 Madison Mosaic Funds (12) (mutual funds), President, 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund (closed end fund), President, 2005 - Present; Madison Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund (closed end fund), President, 2013 - Present; Madison Funds (13) (mutual funds), President, 2009 - Present | Madison Mosaic Funds (all but Equity Trust), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; Madison Funds (13), 2009 - Present | ||||
Frank E. Burgess 1942 | Trustee, 2009 - Present | MIH, Founder; Chairman of the Board, 2012 - Present; Executive Director and President, 2010 - 2012; Managing Director and President, 1973 - 2010 Madison, Executive Director and President, 2010 - 2012; President, 2004 - 2010 MIA, Executive Director and President, 2010 - 2012 Madison Mosaic Funds (12), Vice President, 1996 - 2012; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Vice President, 2005 - 2012; Madison Funds (13), Vice President, 2009 - Present | N/A | ||||
1 “Interested person” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940. Considered an interested Trustee because of the position held with the investment adviser of the Trust. |
114
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Ultra Series Fund’s Trustees and Officers
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships | ||||
Jay R. Sekelsky 1959 | Vice President, 2009 - Present | MIH, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present; Managing Director and Vice President, 1990 - 2010 Madison, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present MIA, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, 2010 - Present; Vice President, 1996 - 2010 Madison Mosaic Funds (12), Vice President, 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Vice President, 2005 - Present; Madison Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Vice President, 2013 - Present; Madison Funds (13), Vice President, 2009 - Present | N/A | ||||
Paul Lefurgey 1964 | Vice President, 2009 - Present | MIH, Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income Investments, 2005 - Present; Madison and MIA, Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income Investments, 2010 - Present MEMBERS Capital Advisors, Inc. (“MCA”) (investment advisory firm), Madison, WI, Vice President, 2003 - 2005 Madison Mosaic Funds (12), Vice President, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Vice President, 2010 - Present; Madison Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Vice President, 2013 - Present; Madison Funds (13), Vice President, 2009 - Present | N/A | ||||
Greg D. Hoppe 1969 | Treasurer, 2009 - Present | MIH and MIA, Vice President, 1999 - Present; Madison, Vice President, 2009 - Present Madison Mosaic Funds (12), Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Chief Financial Officer, 1999 - 2009 Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Chief Financial Officer, 2005 - 2009 Madison Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Vice President, 2008 - Present Madison Funds (13), Treasurer, 2009 - Present | N/A |
115
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Ultra Series Fund’s Trustees and Officers
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships | ||||
Holly S. Baggot 1960 | Secretary, 1999 - Present; Assistant Treasurer, 1999 - 2007; 2009 - Present; Treasurer, 2008 - 2009 | MIH and MIA, Vice President, 2010 - Present; Madison, Vice President, 2009 - Present; MFD Distributor, LLC (“MFD”) (an affiliated brokerage firm of Madison), Vice President, 2012 - Present MCA, Director-Mutual Funds, 2008-2009; Director-Mutual Fund Operations, 2006 - 2008; Operations Officer-Mutual Funds, 2005-2006; Senior Manager-Product & Fund Operations, 2001-2005 Madison Mosaic Funds (12), Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2010 - Present; Madison Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, 2013 - Present; Madison Funds (13), Secretary, 1999 - Present and Treasurer, 2008-2009 and Assistant Treasurer, 1997-2007 and 2009 - Present | N/A | ||||
W. Richard Mason 1960 | Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present | MIH, MIA, Madison and Madison Scottsdale, LC (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Counsel, 2009 - Present; General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, 1996 - 2009 MFD, Principal, 1998 - Present; Concord Asset Management, LLC (“Concord”) (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), General Counsel, 1996 - 2009; NorthRoad Capital Management LLC (“NorthRoad”) (an affiliated investment advisory firm of Madison), Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Counsel, 2011 - Present Madison Mosaic Funds (12), Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, 1992 - 2009 Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, 2005 - 2009 Madison Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2013 - Present Madison Funds (13), Chief Compliance Officer, Corporate Counsel and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present | N/A | ||||
116
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Ultra Series Fund’s Trustees and Officers
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Other Directorships/Trusteeships | ||||
Pamela M. Krill 1966 | General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present | MIH, MIA, Madison, Madison Scottsdale, LC, MFD, and Concord, General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer, 2009 - Present NorthRoad, General Counsel & Chief Legal Officer, 2011 - Present Madison Mosaic Funds (12), General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2010 - Present; Madison Covered Call and Equity Strategy Fund, General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2013 - Present; Madison Funds (13), General Counsel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, 2009 - Present CUNA Mutual Insurance Society (insurance company with affiliated investment advisory, brokerage and mutual fund operations), Madison, WI, Managing Associate General Counsel-Securities & Investments, 2007 - 2009 Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. (law firm), Madison and Milwaukee, WI, Shareholder/Partner, Securities Practice Group, 1994-2007 | N/A |
Independent Trustees | |||||||||
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Portfolios Overseen in Fund Complex2 | Other Directorships/Trusteeships | |||||
Philip E. Blake 1943 | Trustee, 2009 - Present | Retired Investor Lee Enterprises, Inc (news and advertising publisher), Madison, WI, Vice President, 1998 - 2001 Madison Newspapers, Inc., Madison, WI, President and Chief Executive Officer, 1993 - 2000 | 43 | Edgewood College, 2003 - Present; Chairman of the Board, 2010 - Present; Nerites Corporation (technology company), 2004 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (12), 2001 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund, 2012 - Present; Madison Funds (13), 2009 - Present |
1 Independent Trustees serve in such capacity until the Trustee reaches the age of 76, unless retirement is waived by unanimous vote of the remaining Trustees on an annual basis. |
2 As of December 31, 2012, the fund complex consists of the Trust with 16 portfolios, the Madison Funds (formerly known as MEMBERS Mutual Funds) with 13 portfolios, the Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund (a closed-end fund), the Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund (a closed-end fund) and the Madison Mosaic Equity, Income, Tax-Free and Government Money Market Trusts, which together have 12 portfolios, for a grand total of 43 separate portfolios in the fund complex. Not every Trustee is a member of the Board of Trustees of every fund in the fund complex, as noted above. |
117
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Ultra Series Fund’s Trustees and Officers
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Portfolios Overseen in Fund Complex2 | Other Directorships/Trusteeships | |||||
James R Imhoff, Jr. 1944 | Trustee, 2009 - Present | First Weber Group (real estate brokers), Madison, WI, Chief Executive Officer, 1996 - Present | 43 | Park Bank, 1978 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (12), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund, 2005 - Present; Madison Funds (13), 2009 - Present | |||||
Steven P. Riege 1954 | Trustee, 2005 - Present | Ovation Leadership (management consulting), Milwaukee, WI, Owner/President, 2001 - Present; Robert W. Baird & Company (financial services), Milwaukee, WI, Senior Vice President- Marketing and Vice President-Human Resources, 1986 - 2001 | 29 | Madison Funds (13), 2005 - Present | |||||
Richard E. Struthers 1952 | Trustee, 2004 - Present | Clearwater Capital Management (investment advisory firm), Minneapolis, MN, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, 1998 - Present; Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, MN, Chairman, Finance and Investment Committee, 2006 - 2012; IAI Mutual Funds, Minneapolis, MN, President and Director, 1992 - 1997 | 29 | Health Partners, 2013 - Present; Park Nicolet Health Services, 2001 - 2012; Madison Funds (12), 2004 - Present |
118
Ultra Series Fund | December 31, 2012
Ultra Series Fund’s Trustees and Officers
Name and Year of Birth | Position(s) and Length of Time Served1 | Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years | Portfolios Overseen in Fund Complex2 | Other Directorships/Trusteeships | |||||
Richard E. Struthers 1952 | Trustee, 2004 - Present | Clearwater Capital Management (investment advisory firm), Minneapolis, MN, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, 1998 - Present; Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, MN, Chairman, Finance and Investment Committee, 2006 - 2012; IAI Mutual Funds, Minneapolis, MN, President and Director, 1992 -1997 | 29 | Health Partners, 2013 - Present; Park Nicolet Health Services, 2001 - 2012; Madison Funds (12), 2004 - Present | |||||
Lorence D. Wheeler 1938 | Trustee, 2009 - Present | Retired investor; Credit Union Benefits Services, Inc. (a provider of retirement plans and related services for credit union employees nationwide), Madison, WI, President, 1986 - 1997 | 43 | Grand Mountain Bank FSB and Grand Mountain Bancshares, Inc. 2003 - Present; Madison Mosaic Funds (12), 1996 - Present; Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund, 2005 - Present; Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund, 2005 - Present; Madison Funds (13), 2009 - Present |
1 Independent Trustees serve in such capacity until the Trustee reaches the age of 76, unless retirement is waived by unanimous vote of the remaining Trustees on an annual basis. |
2 As of December 31, 2012, the fund complex consists of the Trust with 16 portfolios, the Madison Funds (formerly known as MEMBERS Mutual Funds) with 13 portfolios, the Madison Strategic Sector Premium Fund (a closed-end fund), the Madison Covered Call & Equity Strategy Fund (a closed-end fund) and the Madison Mosaic Equity, Income, Tax-Free and Government Money Market Trusts, which together have 12 portfolios, for a grand total of 43 separate portfolios in the fund complex. Not every Trustee is a member of the Board of Trustees of every fund in the fund complex, as noted above. |
119
This page was intentionally left blank.
SEC File Number: 811-04815